RE: MsExchangeES Event 11
What are you using as the event log manager? I'm running the same auto-accept script on 25 conference rooms and for no reason they stop working. I've had to reboot the exchange server to get it to start working again. Peter Seitz Cubic Corporation Systems Analyst San Diego, Ca. 92123 (858) 505-2724 -Original Message- From: Peter Orlowski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 8:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MsExchangeES Event 11 Does your Event service stop responding?Check and see that the script is still running on those mailboxes. I dont know what causes the messages but I get them every once in a while and occasionally they would stop my Event service. Never solved it. I have an event log manager that watches for these events and restarts the Event service when it sees them. -Original Message- From: Greg S [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 8:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MsExchangeES Event 11 We are running the auto-reply script from cdolive.com on a bunch of mailboxes. The idea is to generate auto-replies for a mail ping application for the purpose of monitoring a few of our monitored servers periodically choke on the script and cough up the event service. Servers are all Exchange 5.5 sp4, Windows 2000 sp3. the error is: Source: MSExchangeES Event ID:11 Desc: A fatal error (0x80004005) occured in an IExchangeEventSink while processing message [Subject =msg subject..]. Any ideas on this? I've found a few articles on MSKB re: the Event 11 - but the fatal error code doesn't match. Its a random problem, pops up every so often, but not consistently. Any Ideas? Thanks. Gregory Sachs InteQ Corporation [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Calendar Problems
Command-Line Switch Purpose --- --- /CleanFreeBusy Cleans and regenerates free/busy information. /CleanfindersRemoves saved searches from the Exchange Server store. /CleanReminders Cleans and regenerates reminders. /CleanViews Restores default views. All custom views you created are lost. /CheckClient Prompt for default manager of e-mail, news, and contacts /ResetFoldersRestores missing folders for the default delivery location. /ResetOutlookBar Rebuilds the Outlook Bar. /SafeLaunches Outlook without extensions, preview pane or toolbar customization. /Nopreview Turns off the Preview Pane and removes the option from the View Menu. /CleanSchedPlus Deletes all Schedule+ data (free/busy, permissions, and .CAL file) from the server and enables the free/busy information from the Outlook Calendar to be used and viewed by all Schedule+ 1.0 users -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 7:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Cc: Lim Margie Subject: Calendar Problems Good morning, OUTLOOK 98 Exchange 5.5 NT SP4 I have a user whose calendar is completely butchered. I have Exported, Deleted, RESETFOLDER, Imported the calendar several times. Each time I do this I get the same butchered calendars. After the resetfolder, the days are still highlighted as though appointments are still there, even before I import the data back in. The calendar has all of the appointments at the top of each day. It also has the blue line of busy along every hour of every day. How can I recreate this calendar to be correct? Thanks, Mike Mitchell _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MEC 2003
Ee. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 8:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC 2003 That's not honey -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 7:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC 2003 Mmm.. With honey? -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 10:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: MEC 2003 I think its rolled in oats. - Original Message - From: Woodruff, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 10:34 AM Subject: MEC 2003 Is it rolled in with TechEd this year? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA
Can you access 5.5 mailbox's using 5.5 OWA from another domain using their W2K authentication? -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 11:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: OWA I agree with Jim's first response. You can keep the OWA 5.5 server(s) till your ready to upgrade them. You can access 2000 mailboxes with OWA 5.5 but not vice versa as Jim stated. - Original Message - From: Jim Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 2:04 PM Subject: RE: OWA Not sure what you are asking. Can you be more specific? Jim Collins Sr. Systems Engineer Competitive Computing, Inc. www.competitive.com -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 2:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA umm but of course if your OWA is on separate IIS server...umm this cant be done right? bill -Original Message- From: Jim Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 1:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA OWA 2000 does not allow access to 5.5 Mailboxes. Keep your existing OWA 5.5 for all mailboxes (5.5 and 2K) until your migration is complete. Once all mailboxes are on 2K, upgrade OWA to OWA 2000. I have an issue where E2K Mailbox users can do everything but delete items using OWA 5.5. If you have any ideas on that please let me know. Jim Collins Sr. Systems Engineer Competitive Computing, Inc. www.competitive.com -Original Message- From: Miller, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 1:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA All, Quick question: We are in the process of upgrading from NT4.0 to AD, and from Exchange5.5 to Exchange2K. We currently have 3 OWA servers (5.5), and would like to keep the same setup in Exchange2K. For a period of time during the migration we will have some users on 5.5 and some on 2K. Do I need to get 2K OWA servers up on line prior to any mailbox migrations, or can a 5.5 server re-direct to a 2K mailbox? Or can I bring up the 2K OWA servers initially and redirect to a 5.5 mailbox? The 2K servers will joining the 5.5 Organization. TIA _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OWA from remote domain
Running OWA 5.5 sp4 on a stand alone server along with Exchange 5.5 in the corp domain. Those in another domain cannot check their email which we host. I've created the local group here and added their global group of OWA users. For some reason they can't authenticate to their domain, even though we have bidirectional trust relationship. They are running W2K ADS. I've looked at the technet OWA troubleshooting guide along with a few Q articles. Is anyone else doing this and had similar problems? Peter Seitz Cubic Corporation Systems Analyst San Diego, Ca. 92123 (858) 505-2724 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: attachments
The Martin Blackstone list of attachments to block... Basics vbs;shs;js;com;bat;cmd;pif;scr;chm;VB Full List EML;VB;ASX;ADE;ADP;BAS;BAT;BIN;CHM;CMD;COM;CPL;CRT;DLL;EXE;HIV;HLP;HTA;INF;I NS;ISP;JS;JSE;JTD;MSC;MSI;MSP;MST;OCX;OFT;OVL;PCD;PIF;PL;PLX;SCR;SCT;SH;SHB; SHS;SYS;VBE;VBS;VSS;VST;VXD;WSC;WSF;WSH; -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 8:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: attachments Hi, Where can I find a list of the most attachments to block? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: attachments
Don't forget to add .ceo also. -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 8:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: attachments Hi, Where can I find a list of the most attachments to block? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: attachments+virus
I got this announcement from Symantec this morning concerning .ceo and .pif's. http://www.sarc.com/avcenter/venc/data/w32.hllw.winevar.html Peter Seitz Cubic Corporation Systems Analyst San Diego, Ca. 92123 (858) 505-2724 -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 8:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: attachments+virus What the heck is a .CEO file anyhow? -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 8:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: attachments+virus EXE is on Martins list of Danger Mpeg is often your/company call (I block it) with regard to the new virus, after looking at the description.. since one of the files is a PIF (which is on martins list or other good things to block) IF the PIF gets blocked..what effect would the .CEO or the .HTM have since the .CEO has no way to register itself with out the PIF being there to run? just curisious bill -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 11:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: attachments So you do not block mpeg and exe? K/ Original Message- From: Seitz, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 17:10 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: attachments Don't forget to add .ceo also. -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 8:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: attachments Hi, Where can I find a list of the most attachments to block? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Using a PST for 'overflow'
My bad, clicked on the wrong email and replied without thinking. It happens. -Original Message- From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:mhutchins;amr-corp.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Using a PST for 'overflow' Wtf? -Original Message- From: Seitz, Peter [mailto:PETER.SEITZ;cubic.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 10:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Using a PST for 'overflow' .cshrc short% more .cshrc # @(#)cshrc 1.11 89/11/29 SMI umask 022 if ( $?prompt ) then set history=32 endif # # oracle environment variables setenv ORACLE_HOME /apps/oracle/816 setenv HARVESTDIR /home/user3/harvest5 setenv ORACLE_BASE /apps/oracle/816 setenv ORACLE_SID HARVEST5 setenv ORACLE_TERM dtterm setenv PATH $ORACLE_HOME/bin:$PATH setenv ODBC_HOME /apps/caiptodbc setenv ODBCINI $ODBC_HOME/odbc.ini # Harvest environment variables #setenv HARVESTHOME /apps/harvest5 setenv HARVESTHOME /home/user3/harvest5 #setenv LM_LICENSE_FILE $HARVESTHOME/license/license.dat setenv LM_LICENSE_FILE /ca_lic setenv PATH $HARVESTHOME/bin:$PATH setenv PATH /apps/caiptodbc/bin:$PATH #setenv LD_LIBRARY_PATH /home/user3/harvest5/lib:/usr/local/CAcrypto:/usr/pec/li b/sun4_solaris:/usr/local/CAlib:/apps/caiptodbc/lib setenv LD_LIBRARY_PATH /home/user3/harvest5/lib:/usr/local/CAcrypto:/usr/pec/lib /sun4_solaris:/usr/local/CAlib # setenv DEFAULT_BROWSER hotjava setenv HARREPHOME /apps/Harvest5/harrep # # FCP environment variables # setenv GALAXYHOME /apps/FCP/Galaxy setenv PATH $GALAXYHOME/bin:$PATH #set path=(/bin /usr/bin /usr/ucb /etc $HARVESTHOME/lib $ODBC_HOME/lib $ODBC_HOM E/bin $ORACLE_HOME/bin $ORACLE_HOME/lib .) set path=(/bin /usr/bin /usr/ucb /etc $HARVESTHOME/lib $HARVESTHOME/bin $ORACLE_ HOME/bin $ORACLE_HOME/lib .) setenv OPENWINHOME /usr/openwin short% -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange [mailto:exchangelist;partition.co.uk] Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 6:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Using a PST for 'overflow' We've been forced into restricting mailboxes as everyones being moved to a central server. Most users are having no problems getting their mailboxes down to 25-50mb, some much lower, a handful much higher. I'm finding it easiest to set some limits on the IS, then override that on individual mailboxes, as required, the MD for instance has a 500mb mailbox, after 2 CD's worth of archiving :-O What I've been saying to users is delete everything you can, anything older than 2 months that you need to keep put into a subfolder, then I go round and export these folders to PSTs, and dump them in their user folders on their local file servers, meaning they're included in the backups on their local servers, but the backup and disk space burden is removed from the Exchange server. I test the PSTs before deleting the originals, but I've seen nothing bigger than about 4-500mb. With enforced limits user will have to keep things in order, and we'll have to look at ongoing archiving in the method described above. 99% aren't aware of PST's, which is probably a good thing, though its added to my workload -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:discussions;entrysecurity.com] Sent: 06 November 2002 13:01 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Using a PST for 'overflow' I do. They don't know they can save them up on their home folder. They know I don't back up the workstations, but most think that you only can save PSTs on local drives ;) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-224131;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Sander Van Butzelaar Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 07:05 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Using a PST for 'overflow' Why the hard line approach? I never said I made the backup of the PST, that's why one has a facilities department...I also didn't say that I found that mail particularly important, the user wants to keep it, so why not let him/her? They know not to come to me regarding items in PST files. Give the user a bit of slack here David. Sander -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:discussions;entrysecurity.com] Sent: 06 November 2002 01:56 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Using a PST for 'overflow' No, just inform them of the 'No PST Backup' policy. I don't back up PSTs. Period. Either its in their mailbox or it is not that important. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-224131;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Sander Van Butzelaar Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 05:49 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Using a PST for 'overflow' I have a couple of users who do the same thing
RE: Using a PST for 'overflow'
.cshrc short% more .cshrc # @(#)cshrc 1.11 89/11/29 SMI umask 022 if ( $?prompt ) then set history=32 endif # # oracle environment variables setenv ORACLE_HOME /apps/oracle/816 setenv HARVESTDIR /home/user3/harvest5 setenv ORACLE_BASE /apps/oracle/816 setenv ORACLE_SID HARVEST5 setenv ORACLE_TERM dtterm setenv PATH $ORACLE_HOME/bin:$PATH setenv ODBC_HOME /apps/caiptodbc setenv ODBCINI $ODBC_HOME/odbc.ini # Harvest environment variables #setenv HARVESTHOME /apps/harvest5 setenv HARVESTHOME /home/user3/harvest5 #setenv LM_LICENSE_FILE $HARVESTHOME/license/license.dat setenv LM_LICENSE_FILE /ca_lic setenv PATH $HARVESTHOME/bin:$PATH setenv PATH /apps/caiptodbc/bin:$PATH #setenv LD_LIBRARY_PATH /home/user3/harvest5/lib:/usr/local/CAcrypto:/usr/pec/li b/sun4_solaris:/usr/local/CAlib:/apps/caiptodbc/lib setenv LD_LIBRARY_PATH /home/user3/harvest5/lib:/usr/local/CAcrypto:/usr/pec/lib /sun4_solaris:/usr/local/CAlib # setenv DEFAULT_BROWSER hotjava setenv HARREPHOME /apps/Harvest5/harrep # # FCP environment variables # setenv GALAXYHOME /apps/FCP/Galaxy setenv PATH $GALAXYHOME/bin:$PATH #set path=(/bin /usr/bin /usr/ucb /etc $HARVESTHOME/lib $ODBC_HOME/lib $ODBC_HOM E/bin $ORACLE_HOME/bin $ORACLE_HOME/lib .) set path=(/bin /usr/bin /usr/ucb /etc $HARVESTHOME/lib $HARVESTHOME/bin $ORACLE_ HOME/bin $ORACLE_HOME/lib .) setenv OPENWINHOME /usr/openwin short% -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange [mailto:exchangelist;partition.co.uk] Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 6:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Using a PST for 'overflow' We've been forced into restricting mailboxes as everyones being moved to a central server. Most users are having no problems getting their mailboxes down to 25-50mb, some much lower, a handful much higher. I'm finding it easiest to set some limits on the IS, then override that on individual mailboxes, as required, the MD for instance has a 500mb mailbox, after 2 CD's worth of archiving :-O What I've been saying to users is delete everything you can, anything older than 2 months that you need to keep put into a subfolder, then I go round and export these folders to PSTs, and dump them in their user folders on their local file servers, meaning they're included in the backups on their local servers, but the backup and disk space burden is removed from the Exchange server. I test the PSTs before deleting the originals, but I've seen nothing bigger than about 4-500mb. With enforced limits user will have to keep things in order, and we'll have to look at ongoing archiving in the method described above. 99% aren't aware of PST's, which is probably a good thing, though its added to my workload -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:discussions;entrysecurity.com] Sent: 06 November 2002 13:01 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Using a PST for 'overflow' I do. They don't know they can save them up on their home folder. They know I don't back up the workstations, but most think that you only can save PSTs on local drives ;) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-224131;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Sander Van Butzelaar Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 07:05 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Using a PST for 'overflow' Why the hard line approach? I never said I made the backup of the PST, that's why one has a facilities department...I also didn't say that I found that mail particularly important, the user wants to keep it, so why not let him/her? They know not to come to me regarding items in PST files. Give the user a bit of slack here David. Sander -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:discussions;entrysecurity.com] Sent: 06 November 2002 01:56 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Using a PST for 'overflow' No, just inform them of the 'No PST Backup' policy. I don't back up PSTs. Period. Either its in their mailbox or it is not that important. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-224131;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Sander Van Butzelaar Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 05:49 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Using a PST for 'overflow' I have a couple of users who do the same thing. They don't want to delete old mail (for whatever reason) and I can't keep extending their mailbox sizes. So they move to PST. Be aware of the risks here! Make a periodic backup of that PST as hard drives are prone to failure. Sander -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange [mailto:exchangelist;partition.co.uk] Sent: 06 November 2002 12:45 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Using a PST for 'overflow' I was having a discussion with someone the other day and he mentioned this phrase in passing, that they used PST files when user mailboxes became full I didn't dwell on this as we were
RE: Hello?
Happy Halloween! -Original Message- From: Steve Molkentin [mailto:themolk;flc.qld.edu.au] Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 2:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Hello? Has the list died? Where is everyone? mailto:themolk;flc.qld.edu.au +---+ | Steve Molkentin | | IT Trainer/HelpDesk | | D/Dial - 07 3372 0819 | | Mobile - 0410 680 018 | +---+-+ | Forest Lake College | | http://www.forestlakecollege.com.au | | The Springfield College | | http://www.thespringfieldcollege.com.au | +-+ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Permission Problems For Migrated Mailboxes
This is normal as we found out in our test lab. -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 11:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Permission Problems For Migrated Mailboxes All, I'm having a weird problem when migrating mailboxes from one Exchange server to another. I'm in mixed mode right now and it doesn't matter if I move a mailbox between 5.5-E2K. Or E2K-E2K. But what seems to happen is once the mailbox is moved admins who have been manually added to their bosses calendar for viewing lose their permissions to view the calendar. Once you re-add them it works fine. Now is there something I'm missing when moving mailboxes that would prevent this from occuring? I've heard that the permissions should stay intact during a move. But it doesn't seem to be the case here. I've had 2 occurences happen so far one mailbox moving from 5.5-E2K and E2K-E2K. Can anyone shed any light on this? TIA, ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: public folder
But Don, he has killed a Ninja Master. What else is there to know? -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 1:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: public folder Exchange is merely ONE of your unfamiliarity's... -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 4:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: public folder So when I do a backup they space will come back or it will only come back if i do a offline defragment. Sorry Im not to familiar with what happens to deleted items in exchange. Rich -Original Message- From: EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 4:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: public folder When you delete a bunch of emails, what happens to the space on the private store. Same rules apply to Public Store. -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 3:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: public folder Hello all, If I delete a 396mb public folder will this free up 396mb on my hard drive. Thanks Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: public folder
Yes. But personally, I stay away from offline defrags. Last time I did this it took me two days to recover. It wasn't pretty and you're just asking for trouble. Let the online defrag and the deletion time reclaim your space. -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 2:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: public folder I know it is really stupid question but i never did a offline defrag and someone the other day told me that when you do an offline defrag you need the same amount of free disk space on your hd as you have in your database. Is this true, thanks. -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 5:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: public folder Oh nohere comes the flames -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jason Coleman Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 1:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: public folder In order to really recover the space that comes from deleting email, mailboxes, etc. an offline defrag is a must. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OWA Password expiration
Forgive me for not paying attention, but I know this was just on the list recently, but I have moved my OWA server to another server, and now the users are getting the password will expire in 0 days message. I've searched technet and I couldn't find an answer. How can I get rid of this message? Peter Seitz Cubic Corporation Systems Analyst San Diego, Ca. 92123 (858) 505-2724 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA Password expiration
You are correct and thank you for the response. I had already modified the constant.inc file, but users were still getting the expiration message. Modifying the root.asp took care of it. Thanks everyone for responding. -Original Message- From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 10:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Password expiration It's definetely in Technet. I have to look it up every time I fiddle with the 2ndary NT server here. try searching all contents for password will expire in 0 days or Q262902 I think is the one you want. Jim -Original Message- From: Seitz, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 12:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA Password expiration Forgive me for not paying attention, but I know this was just on the list recently, but I have moved my OWA server to another server, and now the users are getting the password will expire in 0 days message. I've searched technet and I couldn't find an answer. How can I get rid of this message? Peter Seitz Cubic Corporation Systems Analyst San Diego, Ca. 92123 (858) 505-2724 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Pop error?
Got milk? -Original Message- From: Harmon, Michelle M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 12:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Pop error? I think we all need cookies, blankets, and a nap...? -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Pop error? no sorry didnt relize that... -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 3:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Pop error? Well, thank you for pointing that out so graciously. Did you notice that your email got there before mine? Geoff... -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 3:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Pop error? I gave him that one already it didnt work. -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Pop error? Mmmm. Perhaps then Q296387 won't help him? Geoff... -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Pop error? There is no answer on the internet for your error, I tried to find it and there was no success. Rich -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Pop error? damn i thought i got it right, I will find this error it is my goal in life to provide you with the right qb article. Sarcasm -Original Message- From: Jeremy Pinquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Pop error? um, not the right error - this refers to 0x80040920 and 0x52e my user managed to trigger something called 0x426 - which i can't find anywhere. thanks for trying tho :) jp -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Pop error? Q296387 found it on google.com key words: 1011 POP3SVC Authentication Rich -Original Message- From: Jeremy Pinquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Pop error? anyone know what this means? couldn't find anything on support.ms.com or by googling... jeremy Event Type: Error Event Source: POP3SVC Event Category: Authentication Event ID: 1011 Date: 9/6/2002 Time: 6:32:23 PM User: N/A Computer: MAILBOX Description: Authentication attempt from xx to [EMAIL PROTECTED] has failed with error 0x426. For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. Data: : 49 02 4b 00 I.K. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ:
RE: weird question
What's the number? -Original Message- From: Todd Boynton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 02, 2002 8:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: weird question People email my alphanumeric pager all day long using number@arch.epage.com. Works great. Todd Boynton[EMAIL PROTECTED] == Communications Specialist == UNET Technology Services, Network Operations == Maine School and Library Network == University of Maine System -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 11:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: weird question Hi, I have a question of one of my users. She received a telephone number to send an email to (looks like a mobile number) and needs to get an email to this person, he claims he can receive emails send to that number... What the hell is going on? What should I tell her? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Friday afternoon fun
Ok I'll bite, what game is this? Peter Seitz Cubic Corporation Systems Analyst San Diego, Ca. 92123 (858) 505-2724 -Original Message- From: Brett Wesoloski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 12:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Friday afternoon fun I thought about it but what fun is that. Actually I just got lucky one time. Now I am lucky to get past 800. I don't think the more you play this game the easier it gets. Although it does help for finger eye coordination. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 1:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Friday afternoon fun Dont you think its time to move out of your parents basement? -Original Message- From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 2:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Friday afternoon fun 2682 do you have hand cramps? i get tired after 718 -Original Message- From: Brett Wesoloski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 2:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Friday afternoon fun now my high is 2682. I am going to see if I can get my pilot's license after work. I will bring in a screen shot of my high score that should be good enough shouldn't it? -Original Message- From: Brett Wesoloski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 1:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Friday afternoon fun Mine was 20 but that was when I first started and didn't have a clue how to play and didn't feel like reading any further than Click to start. After three times of 20 I figured I better read further. -Original Message- From: Ryan Malayter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 1:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Friday afternoon fun 27 -Original Message- From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, May 10, 2002 12:20 PM Posted To: Exchange List Conversation: Friday afternoon fun Subject: RE: Friday afternoon fun 890 What uppp what is the worst score anyone has gotten? anyone less then 50? -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 11:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Friday afternoon fun My hand is sweating and is starting to hurt -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Friday afternoon fun 646 here - Just call me ROOKIE! -- From: Tener, Richard Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 09:57 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Friday afternoon fun 1493 I gotta stop playing this thing -Original Message- From: Bill Kuhn - MCSE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 10:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Friday afternoon fun 1176 so far.. -Original Message- From: Darren Ash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 9:46 AM To: ExchangeList@swynk Subject: RE: Friday afternoon fun 576 ... more practise needed ! -Original Message- From: Jeremy Pinquist [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 May 2002 15:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Friday afternoon fun 950 HA ha!!! the simple games are always the most addictive. jeremy -Original Message- From: Brett Wesoloski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 10:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Friday afternoon fun Dang my best is 656 I better keep trying. -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 9:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Friday afternoon fun I got a distance of 798 -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 10:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Friday afternoon fun http://www.andylau.com/fulltimekiller/game/shoot.html -Original Message- From: Julian Stone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 6:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Friday afternoon fun Sorry but this is very addictive http://www.seethru.co.uk/zine/south_coast/helicopter_game.htm Yours, Julian Stone _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
public folder replication
We have two domains here that we would like to share info between domains. We have two way trust and the site replication set to replicate info between the domains, one being the legal domain, and the other is the Corp domain. But Legal still can't see the public folders, and when meeting requests are made, the free/busy info doesn't show up. Has anyone dealt with this before? Both domains are here in the same building. CorpExchange 5.5sp4 on NT4 SP6 Legal 2000sp2 with Exchange 5.5 sp4 TIA Peter Seitz Operating Systems Analyst Cubic Corporation San Diego, Ca. 92021 (858) 505-2724 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
email validity
Is there a way to check to see if an email is valid, without sending an actual test email? Something like ping or telneting to the mail server and checking? Peter Seitz Operating Systems Analyst Cubic Corporation San Diego, Ca. 92021 (858) 505-2724 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange getting bounced
This is an Exchange 5.5, sp4, one of two in our domain. When I take a backup from this system using ntbackup, and try to restore it to our test server, it goes down with the Information store offline. When I do the restore, it'll ask me what server to restore to, and I give it the test servers name. Now, I have done this in the past with no problems, just the last couple of times on this server has been giving me problems. This test server was created with the same site and org name, but I didn't joing the group. I hope this helps. Peter Seitz Operating Systems Analyst Cubic Corporation San Diego, Ca. 92021 (858) 505-2724 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange getting bounced
Let me clarify, when I do a restore on the test server, the original backed up server goes offline. -Original Message- From: Seitz, Peter Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 8:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange getting bounced This is an Exchange 5.5, sp4, one of two in our domain. When I take a backup from this system using ntbackup, and try to restore it to our test server, it goes down with the Information store offline. When I do the restore, it'll ask me what server to restore to, and I give it the test servers name. Now, I have done this in the past with no problems, just the last couple of times on this server has been giving me problems. This test server was created with the same site and org name, but I didn't joing the group. I hope this helps. Peter Seitz Operating Systems Analyst Cubic Corporation San Diego, Ca. 92021 (858) 505-2724 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange getting bounced
Same site, same org, different name. This can't be done this way? -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 9:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange getting bounced That's because you can't have two servers with the same name on the same network. A restore server should be on it's own network with a copy of the production domain's DC. - Original Message - From: Seitz, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 10:43 AM Subject: RE: Exchange getting bounced Let me clarify, when I do a restore on the test server, the original backed up server goes offline. -Original Message- From: Seitz, Peter Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 8:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange getting bounced This is an Exchange 5.5, sp4, one of two in our domain. When I take a backup from this system using ntbackup, and try to restore it to our test server, it goes down with the Information store offline. When I do the restore, it'll ask me what server to restore to, and I give it the test servers name. Now, I have done this in the past with no problems, just the last couple of times on this server has been giving me problems. This test server was created with the same site and org name, but I didn't joing the group. I hope this helps. Peter Seitz Operating Systems Analyst Cubic Corporation San Diego, Ca. 92021 (858) 505-2724 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange getting bounced
that is correct. -Original Message- From: Louis Joyce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 9:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange getting bounced Let me clarify, you're test server is on the same network as your production server? Regards Mr Louis Joyce Data Support Analyst BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Seitz, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 March 2002 16:43 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange getting bounced Let me clarify, when I do a restore on the test server, the original backed up server goes offline. -Original Message- From: Seitz, Peter Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 8:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange getting bounced This is an Exchange 5.5, sp4, one of two in our domain. When I take a backup from this system using ntbackup, and try to restore it to our test server, it goes down with the Information store offline. When I do the restore, it'll ask me what server to restore to, and I give it the test servers name. Now, I have done this in the past with no problems, just the last couple of times on this server has been giving me problems. This test server was created with the same site and org name, but I didn't joing the group. I hope this helps. Peter Seitz Operating Systems Analyst Cubic Corporation San Diego, Ca. 92021 (858) 505-2724 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange getting bounced
I'll try that here in a moment. But the Site and Org name are correct, even the case. -Original Message- From: Andrew Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 9:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange getting bounced I don't think you understood his original post. I think by test server he meant his recovery server, which is an different name but setup with the same Site and Org as it is supposed to. What he is experiencing is that when he restore his tape backup of, say prodsrv1, to the recovery server recover1, then his prodsrv1 IS goes offline. It's a symptom that as if he is not redirecting the restore right. Now, Peter, Did you make sure that the Site and Org are exactly same including upper and lower cases? Haven't done this for a while, but did you put \\ before the recovery server name? Andrew, MCSE (NT W2K) + CCNA P.s. this can be done with his current setup on the same network, whether it SHOULD be done this way is a different issue. -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, March 14, 2002 9:32 AM Posted To: DiscussionGroup Conversation: Exchange getting bounced Subject: Re: Exchange getting bounced One step at a time; I got ahead of myself and mistyped (brain cloud): If the server name is NOT the same, one has to go through extra steps to get Exchange to start. If the server name IS the same, Exchange can start but the server itself probably won't. Test servers don't belong on a production network. Neither do restore servers. Hubs are cheap. - Original Message - From: Andrew Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 11:28 AM Subject: RE: Exchange getting bounced He said same site, same org, DIFFERENT name... Andrew, MCSE (NT W2K) + CCNA -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, March 14, 2002 9:25 AM Posted To: DiscussionGroup Conversation: Exchange getting bounced Subject: Re: Exchange getting bounced One cannot have two servers with the same name on the same network. - Original Message - From: Seitz, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 11:10 AM Subject: RE: Exchange getting bounced Same site, same org, different name. This can't be done this way? -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 9:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange getting bounced That's because you can't have two servers with the same name on the same network. A restore server should be on it's own network with a copy of the production domain's DC. - Original Message - From: Seitz, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 10:43 AM Subject: RE: Exchange getting bounced Let me clarify, when I do a restore on the test server, the original backed up server goes offline. -Original Message- From: Seitz, Peter Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 8:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange getting bounced This is an Exchange 5.5, sp4, one of two in our domain. When I take a backup from this system using ntbackup, and try to restore it to our test server, it goes down with the Information store offline. When I do the restore, it'll ask me what server to restore to, and I give it the test servers name. Now, I have done this in the past with no problems, just the last couple of times on this server has been giving me problems. This test server was created with the same site and org name, but I didn't joing the group. I hope this helps. Peter Seitz Operating Systems Analyst Cubic Corporation San Diego, Ca. 92021 (858) 505-2724 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com
RE: Moving an Exchange Server (5.5) to new Domain
The Halon discharge was too much to handle. -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 12:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Moving an Exchange Server (5.5) to new Domain You set off the fire alarms too many times? John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 If I could wish for my life to be perfect, it would be tempting but I would have to decline, for life would no longer teach me anything. --Allyson Jones -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 3:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Moving an Exchange Server (5.5) to new Domain I stopped free basing in the server room as well. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 12:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Moving an Exchange Server (5.5) to new Domain Came right off. I only wear waxpaper when working on the servers. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 3:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Moving an Exchange Server (5.5) to new Domain What about that time you got your thong stuck in the tape drive?? -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 12:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Moving an Exchange Server (5.5) to new Domain Ed's Move Server Method coupled with changing the Service Account. I have done it a few times w/o incident. -Original Message- From: Tony McCarthy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 3:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Moving an Exchange Server (5.5) to new Domain Hi Everyone, I want to move an Exchange Server (5.5 0n NT4) to a new domain. Currently I have a trust relationship with the new domain but my current domain will cease to exist after the move. I am worried about wrecking Exchange during the move due to SID's and permissions from the old domain being unavailable. Can this be done and if so how? I've attempted this in a test lab but Exchange seems to have the old domain permissions hard coded somewhere and won't accept the new service account permissions from the new domain. I'm wondering if I should preserve the old domain until I have the hardware to join the new domain with a fresh install of Exchange on a new server. The site/server I'm moving is in the same organization that I'm moving to. Any ideas??? Regards Tony _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List
RE: attachment size limits
I don't see on the MTA's site configuration general tab where you can set limits for internal attachments. -Original Message- From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 2:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: attachment size limits Size limits can be set at the IMC's General tab, and also at the MTA's General tab. In both cases the limit is for the whole message, and in the case of the IMC that means after encoding, which adds maybe 30% to the size of the attachment. -Peter -Original Message- From: Seitz, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 14:19 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: attachment size limits basically to limit users from sending 17 mb files. One of our directors tried it and it didn't work, which is good, but I don't actually know where this value is set. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 2:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: attachment size limits There are a number of possible places to set them depending on what one desires. Chris Scharff - MCSE, Exchange MVP 512.652.4500 x244 Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne -Original Message- From: Seitz, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 4:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: attachment size limits Is there a place to set the attachment size limits in Exchange 5.5? I've looked and read through past exchange emails and found alot of discussions on what everyone is using, but nowhere to set them. Peter Seitz Operating Systems Analyst Cubic Corporation San Diego, Ca. 92021 (858) 505-2724 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This message is private or privileged. If you are not the person for whom this message is intended, please delete it and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send this message to anyone else. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: attachment size limits
Found it, thanks. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 6:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: attachment size limits Try server level. -Original Message- From: Seitz, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 8:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: attachment size limits I don't see on the MTA's site configuration general tab where you can set limits for internal attachments. -Original Message- From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 2:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: attachment size limits Size limits can be set at the IMC's General tab, and also at the MTA's General tab. In both cases the limit is for the whole message, and in the case of the IMC that means after encoding, which adds maybe 30% to the size of the attachment. -Peter -Original Message- From: Seitz, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 14:19 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: attachment size limits basically to limit users from sending 17 mb files. One of our directors tried it and it didn't work, which is good, but I don't actually know where this value is set. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 2:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: attachment size limits There are a number of possible places to set them depending on what one desires. Chris Scharff - MCSE, Exchange MVP 512.652.4500 x244 Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne -Original Message- From: Seitz, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 4:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: attachment size limits Is there a place to set the attachment size limits in Exchange 5.5? I've looked and read through past exchange emails and found alot of discussions on what everyone is using, but nowhere to set them. Peter Seitz Operating Systems Analyst Cubic Corporation San Diego, Ca. 92021 (858) 505-2724 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This message is private or privileged. If you are not the person for whom this message is intended, please delete it and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send this message to anyone else. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: attachment size limits
Is this bi-directional, or just outgoing? -Original Message- From: Seitz, Peter Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 6:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: attachment size limits Found it, thanks. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 6:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: attachment size limits Try server level. -Original Message- From: Seitz, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 8:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: attachment size limits I don't see on the MTA's site configuration general tab where you can set limits for internal attachments. -Original Message- From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 2:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: attachment size limits Size limits can be set at the IMC's General tab, and also at the MTA's General tab. In both cases the limit is for the whole message, and in the case of the IMC that means after encoding, which adds maybe 30% to the size of the attachment. -Peter -Original Message- From: Seitz, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 14:19 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: attachment size limits basically to limit users from sending 17 mb files. One of our directors tried it and it didn't work, which is good, but I don't actually know where this value is set. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 2:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: attachment size limits There are a number of possible places to set them depending on what one desires. Chris Scharff - MCSE, Exchange MVP 512.652.4500 x244 Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne -Original Message- From: Seitz, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 4:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: attachment size limits Is there a place to set the attachment size limits in Exchange 5.5? I've looked and read through past exchange emails and found alot of discussions on what everyone is using, but nowhere to set them. Peter Seitz Operating Systems Analyst Cubic Corporation San Diego, Ca. 92021 (858) 505-2724 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This message is private or privileged. If you are not the person for whom this message is intended, please delete it and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send this message to anyone else. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
RE: attachment size limits
perv -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 7:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: attachment size limits bi-directional... -Original Message- From: Seitz, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 10:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: attachment size limits Is this bi-directional, or just outgoing? -Original Message- From: Seitz, Peter Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 6:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: attachment size limits Found it, thanks. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 6:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: attachment size limits Try server level. -Original Message- From: Seitz, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 8:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: attachment size limits I don't see on the MTA's site configuration general tab where you can set limits for internal attachments. -Original Message- From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 2:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: attachment size limits Size limits can be set at the IMC's General tab, and also at the MTA's General tab. In both cases the limit is for the whole message, and in the case of the IMC that means after encoding, which adds maybe 30% to the size of the attachment. -Peter -Original Message- From: Seitz, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 14:19 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: attachment size limits basically to limit users from sending 17 mb files. One of our directors tried it and it didn't work, which is good, but I don't actually know where this value is set. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 2:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: attachment size limits There are a number of possible places to set them depending on what one desires. Chris Scharff - MCSE, Exchange MVP 512.652.4500 x244 Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne -Original Message- From: Seitz, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 4:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: attachment size limits Is there a place to set the attachment size limits in Exchange 5.5? I've looked and read through past exchange emails and found alot of discussions on what everyone is using, but nowhere to set them. Peter Seitz Operating Systems Analyst Cubic Corporation San Diego, Ca. 92021 (858) 505-2724 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This message is private or privileged. If you are not the person for whom this message is intended, please delete it and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send this message to anyone else. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives
attachment size limits
Is there a place to set the attachment size limits in Exchange 5.5? I've looked and read through past exchange emails and found alot of discussions on what everyone is using, but nowhere to set them. Peter Seitz Operating Systems Analyst Cubic Corporation San Diego, Ca. 92021 (858) 505-2724 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: attachment size limits
basically to limit users from sending 17 mb files. One of our directors tried it and it didn't work, which is good, but I don't actually know where this value is set. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 2:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: attachment size limits There are a number of possible places to set them depending on what one desires. Chris Scharff - MCSE, Exchange MVP 512.652.4500 x244 Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne -Original Message- From: Seitz, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 4:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: attachment size limits Is there a place to set the attachment size limits in Exchange 5.5? I've looked and read through past exchange emails and found alot of discussions on what everyone is using, but nowhere to set them. Peter Seitz Operating Systems Analyst Cubic Corporation San Diego, Ca. 92021 (858) 505-2724 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Missing data in Restore
I did a backup of my exchange 5.5 server, and did a recovery on the recovery server. After running the patch and the consistancy checker, some info did not come across, such as the DL, primary NT Account, and user info such as office, number, etc. Is this normal? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Missing data in Restore
As in the IS/DS? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 10:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Missing data in Restore It would be if you didn't restore the Exchange directory. -Original Message- From: Seitz, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 12:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Missing data in Restore I did a backup of my exchange 5.5 server, and did a recovery on the recovery server. After running the patch and the consistancy checker, some info did not come across, such as the DL, primary NT Account, and user info such as office, number, etc. Is this normal? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Missing data in Restore
This is our NTBackup script that runs every nite: ntbackup backup f:\exchsrvr\tracking.log DS \\shemp IS \\shemp /b /hc:on /t Normal /l c:\winnt\shempbackup.log wait 360 ntbackup eject Do we need to add dsadata\dir.edb as well? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 10:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Missing data in Restore Couldn't it? Sure. Wouldn't it? I didn't set it up, so I don't know. -Original Message- From: Seitz, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 12:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Missing data in Restore Wouldn't NTBackup backup this as well? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 10:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Missing data in Restore As in the dir.edb. -Original Message- From: Seitz, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 12:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Missing data in Restore As in the IS/DS? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 10:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Missing data in Restore It would be if you didn't restore the Exchange directory. -Original Message- From: Seitz, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 12:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Missing data in Restore I did a backup of my exchange 5.5 server, and did a recovery on the recovery server. After running the patch and the consistancy checker, some info did not come across, such as the DL, primary NT Account, and user info such as office, number, etc. Is this normal? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Scheduling of rooms for events
You don't need the Auto-Accept script installed to do this? Is this built into Exchange2K? -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 8:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Scheduling of rooms for events We do this, although we are quite a bit smaller then your organization. What I did was make the room a user, then log in as that room and then go into Tools/Options/Calendar Options/Resource Scheduling/ then check the first two boxes (unless you don't accept recurring meetings, then check all three). Logout that user. Now to test, start a new meeting and invite yourself, place the room under resources and not under required to attend. Then press SEND. You should then get a message window that says the resource has eitehr accepted your meeting or declined it. hth, Bob Sadler City of Leawood, KS, USA Internet/WAN Specialist 913-339-6700 X194 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Sabo, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 10:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Scheduling of rooms for events We are going to try to use Exchange 2000 for the scheduling of rooms and events here on campus by using public folders with calendars, is anyone using Exchange for this. Will Exchange work for this? Is there any particular setup necessary for this? Any feedback would be appreciated. Thanks, Eric Sabo NT Administrator Computing Services Center California University of Pennsylvania _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Scheduling of rooms for events
That's great! Another reason I can tack on for migrating.. -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 8:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Scheduling of rooms for events Ugh, sorry about the blank email list...NO, you don't need the Auto-Accept script installed any more. Bob Sadler City of Leawood, KS, USA Internet/WAN Specialist 913-339-6700 X194 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Seitz, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 10:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Scheduling of rooms for events You don't need the Auto-Accept script installed to do this? Is this built into Exchange2K? -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 8:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Scheduling of rooms for events We do this, although we are quite a bit smaller then your organization. What I did was make the room a user, then log in as that room and then go into Tools/Options/Calendar Options/Resource Scheduling/ then check the first two boxes (unless you don't accept recurring meetings, then check all three). Logout that user. Now to test, start a new meeting and invite yourself, place the room under resources and not under required to attend. Then press SEND. You should then get a message window that says the resource has eitehr accepted your meeting or declined it. hth, Bob Sadler City of Leawood, KS, USA Internet/WAN Specialist 913-339-6700 X194 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Sabo, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 10:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Scheduling of rooms for events We are going to try to use Exchange 2000 for the scheduling of rooms and events here on campus by using public folders with calendars, is anyone using Exchange for this. Will Exchange work for this? Is there any particular setup necessary for this? Any feedback would be appreciated. Thanks, Eric Sabo NT Administrator Computing Services Center California University of Pennsylvania _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange server removal
I have ScanMail 3.8 installed on it and it complains that it couldn't start the Event Services. The error in the event viewer was so vague that it led me no where in trying to find out what is causing the problem. -Original Message- From: Brian Ko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 9:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange server removal Do you need Event Service on that Exchange Server? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Seitz, Peter Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 10:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange server removal I need to rebuild one of my exchange servers in my site. Is there a need to remove from the site before rebuilding? I have Exchange 5.5 SP4, NT4 SP6a. I did a ScanMail upgrade on four different servers, and this one failed to start and the event services failed to start. Other than that, it seems to be working for the users, just no scanmail capability, only on the main exchange server. Peter Seitz Operating Systems Analyst Cubic Corporation San Diego, Ca. 92021 (858) 505-2724 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Reasonable message size limits
FTP? -Original Message- From: Jasa, Ken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 12:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Reasonable message size limits Thanks. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 2:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Reasonable message size limits 1. We have a dedicated full T-1 to our ISP. 2. We do environmental cleanup at this location, so we do a lot of work with CAD / Geologic data files that can become quite large in size. 3. Several of the companies we interact with (labs, subcontractors, etc.) require these files. 4. Because of the above criteria, we felt that was a reasonable limit. -Original Message- From: Jasa, Ken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 12:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Reasonable message size limits What did you base that number on? -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 2:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Reasonable message size limits Ours is set to 15mb inbound and outbound. Jim Blunt -Original Message- From: Exchange Discussions [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 12:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Reasonable message size limits This is a good question. I have personally limited it to 2MB (except the directors) with a hard ass approach at first. I will be raising it in a bit once people remember that they need to be reasonable in what they send (IE the guy in accounting who tried to email a 98MB file to himself at home). I am also curious to hear what people are limiting it to. -- Dustin -Original Message- From: Jasa, Ken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: February 27, 2002 12:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Reasonable message size limits Hello, I have been required to raise the message size limit on all connections to 20Mbs. We have already seen it cause problems across one of our links. I know it is dependent on the bandwidth and hardware. I just wanted to get some ideas of what size limits other companies are using. Thanks. Ken Jasa Messaging Manager Weber Shandwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange server removal
I need to rebuild one of my exchange servers in my site. Is there a need to remove from the site before rebuilding? I have Exchange 5.5 SP4, NT4 SP6a. I did a ScanMail upgrade on four different servers, and this one failed to start and the event services failed to start. Other than that, it seems to be working for the users, just no scanmail capability, only on the main exchange server. Peter Seitz Operating Systems Analyst Cubic Corporation San Diego, Ca. 92021 (858) 505-2724 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Scanmail Install
Has anyone had any issues installing ScanMail (any version) on Echange 5.5, sp4? I finish my install and the realtime monitor doesn't start, and when I try to start it from the services, I get the generic winnt internal error 2140. Trend has been advising me, but nothing has worked so far, so I put it to the list. Thanks. Peter Seitz Operating Systems Analyst Cubic Corporation San Diego, Ca. 92021 (858) 505-2724 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Scanmail Install
Yep, exchange service accounts on both. -Original Message- From: Lynne July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 7:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Scanmail Install What account were you logged into the Exchange server with when you installed Scan Mail? What account is the Real Time Monitor using? If both answers are not the Exchange service account, try using that. -Original Message- From: Seitz, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 7:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Scanmail Install Has anyone had any issues installing ScanMail (any version) on Echange 5.5, sp4? I finish my install and the realtime monitor doesn't start, and when I try to start it from the services, I get the generic winnt internal error 2140. Trend has been advising me, but nothing has worked so far, so I put it to the list. Thanks. Peter Seitz Operating Systems Analyst Cubic Corporation San Diego, Ca. 92021 (858) 505-2724 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Scanmail Install
Noop, all local. I should also add that the first time I did this was remotely from an exchange cluster, but since then it has been a local install. The exchange cluster installed just fine, and after that I upgraded another exchange server in another domain. Go figure. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 7:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Scanmail Install You are logged onto the local machine? Not doing this from Terminal Server or anything? -Original Message- From: Seitz, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 7:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Scanmail Install Yep, exchange service accounts on both. -Original Message- From: Lynne July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 7:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Scanmail Install What account were you logged into the Exchange server with when you installed Scan Mail? What account is the Real Time Monitor using? If both answers are not the Exchange service account, try using that. -Original Message- From: Seitz, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 7:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Scanmail Install Has anyone had any issues installing ScanMail (any version) on Echange 5.5, sp4? I finish my install and the realtime monitor doesn't start, and when I try to start it from the services, I get the generic winnt internal error 2140. Trend has been advising me, but nothing has worked so far, so I put it to the list. Thanks. Peter Seitz Operating Systems Analyst Cubic Corporation San Diego, Ca. 92021 (858) 505-2724 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Scanmail Install
I have reinstalled over the top of previous installs and that has went well. But this particular instance it hasn't worked. Trend sent me documentation on removing previous copies, including reg hacks and folder deletions. Still didn't work after a fresh new install. -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 8:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Scanmail Install Did you uninstall the first copy of Scanmail before installing the upgrade, or did you just install over it? If you just installed over, then I would suggest that you uninstall the first version, then install the upgrade. For some reason the upgrade method just doesn't work well (At least on my servers it hasn't, YMMV). John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 My toys! My toys! I can't do this job without my toys! -Original Message- From: Seitz, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 9:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Scanmail Install Has anyone had any issues installing ScanMail (any version) on Echange 5.5, sp4? I finish my install and the realtime monitor doesn't start, and when I try to start it from the services, I get the generic winnt internal error 2140. Trend has been advising me, but nothing has worked so far, so I put it to the list. Thanks. Peter Seitz Operating Systems Analyst Cubic Corporation San Diego, Ca. 92021 (858) 505-2724 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: clustering wireless
Trust us on this one, clustering won't buy you a thing. I inherited a clustered exchange server here at work and Kevin is right, when the Db is corrupt, you're toast. Simple as that. Stick with Raid level redundancy, backups, and a recovery server. Peter Seitz Operating Systems Analyst Cubic Corporation San Diego, Ca. 92021 (858) 505-2724 -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 6:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: clustering wireless Hello, Has anyone ever set MCSC between two building over a wireless bridge. I was wondering if it is possible to cluster two exchange servers over a Cisco Aironet 340. Thanks Richard _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ScanMail Message: To Sender, sensitive content found and acti on taken.
Are you running ver 3.8? -Original Message- From: Denis Baldwin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 11:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: FW: ScanMail Message: To Sender, sensitive content found and acti on taken. This is a new one for me. Anyone else get this one? Denis -Original Message- From: System Attendant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 2:27 PM To: Denis Baldwin Subject: ScanMail Message: To Sender, sensitive content found and action taken. Trend SMEX Content Filter has detected sensitive content. Place = Exchange Discussions; ; ; Exchange Discussions Sender = Denis Baldwin Subject = RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) Delivery Time = January 08, 2002 (Tuesday) 14:27:23 Policy = Dirty Words Action on this mail = Quarantine message Warning message from administrator: Sender, Content filter has detected a sensitive e-mail. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ScanMail Message: To Sender, sensitive content found and acti on taken.
I will be tonite. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 11:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ScanMail Message: To Sender, sensitive content found and acti on taken. 3.8? That must be new? Are you running it? Any good? -Original Message- From: Seitz, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 11:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ScanMail Message: To Sender, sensitive content found and acti on taken. Are you running ver 3.8? -Original Message- From: Denis Baldwin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 11:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: FW: ScanMail Message: To Sender, sensitive content found and acti on taken. This is a new one for me. Anyone else get this one? Denis -Original Message- From: System Attendant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 2:27 PM To: Denis Baldwin Subject: ScanMail Message: To Sender, sensitive content found and action taken. Trend SMEX Content Filter has detected sensitive content. Place = Exchange Discussions; ; ; Exchange Discussions Sender = Denis Baldwin Subject = RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) Delivery Time = January 08, 2002 (Tuesday) 14:27:23 Policy = Dirty Words Action on this mail = Quarantine message Warning message from administrator: Sender, Content filter has detected a sensitive e-mail. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions
Your posts are duplicating rapidly as well. -Original Message- From: Osama S. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2002 3:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions Hi, (Exchange 5.5/ SP4) my IS is suddenly growing very rapidly. I checked the integrity of the priv.edb using ISINTEG and also used ESEUTIL to do an offline defrag. The offline Defrag recovered about 1GB. Now the IS has grown again about +2GB since that defrag (2GB in 8h). When I checked the Mailbox sizes now and compared them to the mailbox sizes before the defrag I found the difference to be 27MB only and not 2GB. Also weiredm, the total of my mailboxes is only 8.5GB while my priv.edb is now 20.5GB. I have mailbox limitations on most mailboxes and none are unusually high. The biggest two mailboxes are 200MB each. I also noticed in Exchange Admin on the Mailboxes resources table it quite frequently shows the Exchange Administrative Account as the NT Acccount. On double clicking the mailbox I can see the correct NT account in that view. What is going on? Would appreciate any help. Osama Salah _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SNMP on an Exchange server.
404 -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 2:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SNMP on an Exchange server. You only need one file. This one: http://www.robichaux.net/files/NTexchperf.mib.zip -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 12:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SNMP on an Exchange server. Good afternoon to you all: I am in the process of building a MIB file for Exchange based on the PerfMon MIB from Microsoft. My question is this; do I need to customize the MIB file for the individual configuration of the Exchange server (some have IMC's, others don't, different drive configurations, etc). OR, can I use one generic MIB file and trust that the SNMP service won't choke when I rebuild MIB.BIN. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Believe nothing because it is written in books. Believe nothing because wise men say it is so. Believe nothing because it is religious doctrine. Believe it only because you yourself know it to be true. -- Buddha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NTBackup
Our bat file reads: ntbackup backup z:\exchsrvr\tracking.log DS \\curly IS \\curly /b /hc:on /t Normal /l C:\winnt\backup.log ntbackup eject z:\exchsrvr is because we are a clustered enviroment, hence Larry, Moe, Curly, Curly being the virtual node, Larry and Moe are the actual nodes. Our only problem has been lately is that our store has exceeded tape capacity, and we have to click on OK the next morning to finish up the backup on the next tape. sorry, no haiku. Peter Seitz Operating Systems Analyst Cubic Corporation San Diego, Ca. 92021 (858) 505-2724 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 10:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NTBackup Iron Chef Haiku [1] Subtle textures not seen here And no steeenking rhymes ntbackup rules I should say in most cases Small vexing problem on just one server all drives don't go on one tape space not the issue when each drive is done wants new tape for the next drive command line follows ntbackup backup c: d: e: ds \\server is \\server /v /r /b /e /l d:\backup\backup.log /hc:on /t normal /v verify /r restricts access /b backs up local registry /e log includes exceptions only /l backup log filename /hc:on Hardware compression on /t normal (full) backup not using the slash-a backup acts like it is there three drives specified /a Causes backup sets to be added or appended after the last backup set on the tape. When /a is not specified, the program overwrites previous data. When more than one drive is specified but /a is not, the program overwrites the contents of the tape with the information from the first drive selected and then appends the backup sets for the remaining drives. Exchange alone works Combination doesn't work Drives alone bite too NTSP6 Ex55Sp4 hotfixes as well makes no difference running comand line or bat any help out there? Thanks, Paul [1] in Japanese, the word haiku has 3 syllables = ha-i-ku deal with it -Michèle Sharik, October 26, 2001 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Opinion on Backups
That's what I say. I do mock restores and it works just fine. Never had a problem using NTBackup. It just works. Peter Seitz Operating Systems Analyst Cubic Corporation San Diego, Ca. 92021 (858) 505-2724 -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 11:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Opinion on Backups Why pay for dinner if you can get it for free? What does NTBACKUP not do that you need to do? Ed Crowley Compaq Computer -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Craig Manske Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 3:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Opinion on Backups The software wasn't to bad functionality wise. Let me ask you a question. Would you return to a restaurant who's owner forced you to pay double for your dinner because you accidentally spilled your plate on the floor, even if they had the greatest food in the world? I highly doubt it... I feel the same way about software companies. Quality of product is only 33% of the purchase. The other 66% deals with customer support, sales, price, availability, how often upgrades are released, how long they support old versions, etc... One of our servers is NT 3.51 on a p133 with Backup Exec 7.01. It doesn't need upgrading because it does what it does, and the hardware works. Why spend thousands of dollars in hardware, software, and time just to have a corvette thats only purpose is to drive a person across the street and back? The new version of BE doesn't support NT 3.51, so now I need to upgrade to at least NT 4.0. NT 4.0 isn't supported by my hardware, so now I need to upgrade my hardware and waste half a day doing it. Why should I have to pay $5000+ to upgrade just because Veritas fails to keep customer records? If I needed to reinstall CadKEY their customer support rep would gladly say, I'm sorry to hear that you lost your software key and serial numbers, let me get those for you right away. Unlike Veritas, Sorry, you have to upgrade. or the way I interpret it, Heh heh heh, another idiot who lost his codes, let's make some money offa this fool. When they could have said, Fax us over your proof of purchase and we'll get you some new codes. If I have to upgrade anyway I'm defiantly not going back to Veritas. And if I have to upgrade one server I might as well upgrade the backup software on the rest of my servers. Sorry to get angry like this, but I get mad when companies don't care about customers who fail to spend at least $5 million on their software a year. -Craig -Original Message- From: Tom.Gray [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 3:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Opinion on Backups Have you had any actual problems with the software? Tom Gray, Network Engineer All Kinds of Minds The Center for Development and Learning University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ATT Net: (919)960- -Original Message- From: Craig Manske [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 4:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Opinion on Backups I've been looking at Backup software for out NT/2000/Exchange servers. Right now we run Veritas Backup Exec but because of the poor support (Pay support sucks) and horriable Customer Service (They didn't have any information on file about my company or purchases). I've decided to choose another brand of tape software. What I'd like to know is what you're opinion is on the best software (Other then BE) to use with NT/2000 including Exchange support. Thanks -- Craig Manske [EMAIL PROTECTED] IS Manager Stanek Tool www.stanektool.com New Berlin, WI _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List
RE: MEC
It's a state of mind. A philosophy. It's being in Cabo with a cold Corona and fish tacos. Peter Seitz Operating Systems Analyst Cubic Corporation San Diego, Ca. 92021 (858) 505-2724 -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 1:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC I'm wishing I went to the MEC just to see what the hype is about these darn fish taco's. I would never eat anything like that but just to see what in h*** is so special about them. John Bowles Exchange Administrator NT Server Workstation Team Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 4:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Fish: The Forbidden Taco. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 3:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Beer Good. Taco Good. Lambada Bad. Andy David J Muller International -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 03:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Does anyone know where MEC is this year? Anyone, anyone? Of course if lots of people are canceling, that just means more beer and fish tacos for Andy. Doug Hampshire Iron Chef Hanji -Original Message- From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 9:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: MEC I got that as well. My boss called to cancel his registration yesterday as he was not willing to fly down there after recent events. They told him they would be releasing an email yesterday as a large number of people have been canceling . . . just curious if someone had an inside scoop or heard anything yet . . . - Original Message - From: Crumbaker, Ron [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 12:19 PM Subject: RE: MEC Yes. Still on. Here is what I got from them: September 11 was a day of shock and sadness for people around the world. Our hearts go out to all those who have been affected by this terrible tragedy. As you know, President Bush and other global and national leaders urged that the business and economic activities of this nation and the global economy must continue, even as we all work together to address the terrible human costs of the September 11th tragedy. The reopening of the financial markets is just one step in resuming the economic activities of our nation. After long consideration, we have decided to move forward with the MEC 2001 in Orlando, Florida, on September 30th through October 4th as scheduled. Based on input from travel industry and government officials, we strongly believe that national and international air transportation, hotels and other support services will be fully operational before the MEC 2001 conference opens. All MEC 2001 keynotes, sessions, functions and special events will take place as scheduled. We are working closely with state and local authorities to ensure every possible security measure is in place. All of us at Microsoft are keeping the victims of this tragedy in our thoughts and prayers. We hope to see you in Orlando as we carry on our lives full of pride in our values and our country. Please direct inquiries to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sincerely, The MEC 2001 Team Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP Network Specialist [EMAIL PROTECTED] MPD, Inc. -An Employee Owned Company Office 270-685-6381 Fax 270-685-6212 -Original Message- From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 11:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MEC Is MEC still on? I have heard rumors . . . _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ:
RE: MEC
Absolutely! -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 1:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Cabo Wabo, Yeah baby! [1] [1] Don't forget the lime for the Corona. -Original Message- From: Seitz, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 1:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC It's a state of mind. A philosophy. It's being in Cabo with a cold Corona and fish tacos. Peter Seitz Operating Systems Analyst Cubic Corporation San Diego, Ca. 92021 (858) 505-2724 -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 1:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC I'm wishing I went to the MEC just to see what the hype is about these darn fish taco's. I would never eat anything like that but just to see what in h*** is so special about them. John Bowles Exchange Administrator NT Server Workstation Team Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 4:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Fish: The Forbidden Taco. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 3:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Beer Good. Taco Good. Lambada Bad. Andy David J Muller International -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 03:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Does anyone know where MEC is this year? Anyone, anyone? Of course if lots of people are canceling, that just means more beer and fish tacos for Andy. Doug Hampshire Iron Chef Hanji -Original Message- From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 9:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: MEC I got that as well. My boss called to cancel his registration yesterday as he was not willing to fly down there after recent events. They told him they would be releasing an email yesterday as a large number of people have been canceling . . . just curious if someone had an inside scoop or heard anything yet . . . - Original Message - From: Crumbaker, Ron [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 12:19 PM Subject: RE: MEC Yes. Still on. Here is what I got from them: September 11 was a day of shock and sadness for people around the world. Our hearts go out to all those who have been affected by this terrible tragedy. As you know, President Bush and other global and national leaders urged that the business and economic activities of this nation and the global economy must continue, even as we all work together to address the terrible human costs of the September 11th tragedy. The reopening of the financial markets is just one step in resuming the economic activities of our nation. After long consideration, we have decided to move forward with the MEC 2001 in Orlando, Florida, on September 30th through October 4th as scheduled. Based on input from travel industry and government officials, we strongly believe that national and international air transportation, hotels and other support services will be fully operational before the MEC 2001 conference opens. All MEC 2001 keynotes, sessions, functions and special events will take place as scheduled. We are working closely with state and local authorities to ensure every possible security measure is in place. All of us at Microsoft are keeping the victims of this tragedy in our thoughts and prayers. We hope to see you in Orlando as we carry on our lives full of pride in our values and our country. Please direct inquiries to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sincerely, The MEC 2001 Team Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP Network Specialist [EMAIL PROTECTED] MPD, Inc. -An Employee Owned Company Office 270-685-6381 Fax 270-685-6212 -Original Message- From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 11:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MEC Is MEC still on? I have heard rumors . . . _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED
RE: Exchange virus protection and filters
Trend ScanMail Rocks. -Original Message- From: Louanne Fournier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 12:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange virus protection and filters We are currently using Mail Essentials and are preparing to upgrade. Before handing out upgrade money I have been asked to look into what other programs might be better both in functionality and price. I am happy with Mail Essentials but their support isn't great. Nothing really online and not great response by phone. I checked the archives but didn't see much there. Can anyone let me know what they are using or what seems to be the most functional currently? I am looking at Scanmail but want to compare several. Thanks. Regards, Louanne Fournier, MCSE, MCT Options Software Consulting Voice: 905-681-2100 x 213 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This mail was processed by Mail essentials for Exchange/SMTP, the email security management gateway. Mail essentials adds content checking, email encryption, anti spam, anti virus, attachment compression, personalised auto responders, archiving and more to your Microsoft Exchange Server or SMTP mail server. For more information visit http://www.mailessentials.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Trend Scanmail on 2-node cluster
I installed over an older version and had no problems on a 5.5 Clustered Exchange. And it emails virus notices. -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 7:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Trend Scanmail on 2-node cluster Dan, are you installing over an existing scanmail installation or is this new? I had this same problem with my 5.5 cluster and we finally got it to install by removing the older version first. Now the thing STILL won't send any e-mail notifications when it finds a virus, but that's another kettle of fish. Lori Hunter LAN Administrator Citi Commerce Solutions (847) 597-3118 Sic gorgiamus allos subjectatos nuc -Original Message- From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 4:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Trend Scanmail on 2-node cluster Have you tried failing over and then installing on the (then) passive node? no, but i would not expect that to work since the installer requires both nodes to be installed at one time, or it reports failure... maybe this is worth a try as a last resort, although I am aiming for a clean installation since this is a production server. thanks for your reply. regards, dan. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Alternate recipient
I have a user that just wants meeting requests for her boss to go to her inbox. Is there a way to do this without having everything that is sent to him, also sent to her? Should I just make her alternate recipient and apply a rule to keep meeting requests? Peter Seitz Operating Systems Analyst Cubic Corporation San Diego, Ca. 92021 (858) 505-2724 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
