RE: CONFERENCE ROOMS
Try the Auto Accept wizard script from Robert Strong's website (http://www.exchangecode.com). I don't think he has an Exchange 2000 version yet but then you didn't mention which version of Exchange you are running. Nate Couch EDS Messaging -- From: Reed, Alexander Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: Thursday, January 2, 2003 12:49 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: FW: CONFERENCE ROOMS I am new to this list and I hope to gain more knowledge about Exchange Server. So to begin, I have a problem with our conference rooms. We current have a mailbox setup called Resource Proxy that is the owner of all of the conference rooms. When someone schedules a conference room, the resource proxy determines if the room is available (by seeing if it has a meeting scheduled for that time) and auto excepts if there is not conflict. There are some major drawbacks of resource scheduling in this manner including some conflicts we have seen in the past. I have looked into new methods to auto resource scheduling in the past, and I would like you to resolve this. I assume there is a more efficient way to script the automatic scheduling of conference rooms or do this in Exchange. I appreciate any help! Thanks, Alex _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CONFERENCE ROOMS
Exchange 5.5 sp3. I will look into this. Thanks to all that helped. -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 2:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: CONFERENCE ROOMS Try the Auto Accept wizard script from Robert Strong's website (http://www.exchangecode.com). I don't think he has an Exchange 2000 version yet but then you didn't mention which version of Exchange you are running. Nate Couch EDS Messaging -- From: Reed, Alexander Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: Thursday, January 2, 2003 12:49 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: FW: CONFERENCE ROOMS I am new to this list and I hope to gain more knowledge about Exchange Server. So to begin, I have a problem with our conference rooms. We current have a mailbox setup called Resource Proxy that is the owner of all of the conference rooms. When someone schedules a conference room, the resource proxy determines if the room is available (by seeing if it has a meeting scheduled for that time) and auto excepts if there is not conflict. There are some major drawbacks of resource scheduling in this manner including some conflicts we have seen in the past. I have looked into new methods to auto resource scheduling in the past, and I would like you to resolve this. I assume there is a more efficient way to script the automatic scheduling of conference rooms or do this in Exchange. I appreciate any help! Thanks, Alex _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CONFERENCE ROOMS
For Exchange 2000: http://autoaccept-sink.sourceforge.net/ -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, January 02, 2003 1:17 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: CONFERENCE ROOMS Subject: RE: CONFERENCE ROOMS Try the Auto Accept wizard script from Robert Strong's website (http://www.exchangecode.com). I don't think he has an Exchange 2000 version yet but then you didn't mention which version of Exchange you are running. Nate Couch EDS Messaging -- From: Reed, Alexander Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: Thursday, January 2, 2003 12:49 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: FW: CONFERENCE ROOMS I am new to this list and I hope to gain more knowledge about Exchange Server. So to begin, I have a problem with our conference rooms. We current have a mailbox setup called Resource Proxy that is the owner of all of the conference rooms. When someone schedules a conference room, the resource proxy determines if the room is available (by seeing if it has a meeting scheduled for that time) and auto excepts if there is not conflict. There are some major drawbacks of resource scheduling in this manner including some conflicts we have seen in the past. I have looked into new methods to auto resource scheduling in the past, and I would like you to resolve this. I assume there is a more efficient way to script the automatic scheduling of conference rooms or do this in Exchange. I appreciate any help! Thanks, Alex _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Conference Rooms and such...
I didn't know that. I thought that you had to invite it as a resource to get
it to work. I guess I never tried to do it any other way :)
Ken Powell
Systems Administrator
Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS)
Vancouver, Washington
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voice: (360) 397-6121 x7665
-Original Message-
From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 5:22 PM
To: Exchange 5.5 List
Subject: RE: Conference Rooms and such...
Ah - there's an advantage to the script. Using the Outlook UI method you
have to address the resource as a Resource. If you do it as an Attendee
(optional or required) it won't auto accept the request.
Aloha,
-Ben-
Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3
Director of Information Services
Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
http://www.hawaiilawyer.com
-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 9:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Conference Rooms and such...
Mr. Strong's script has no such limitation on how you address
the resources. Optional, required, resource, whatever - it
all works a treat.
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Devin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 1:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Conference Rooms and such...
Yep... that the Q article that I had seen this past weekend.
Thanks a bunch for everyone's help, I really appreciate it.
I still have a couple of questions, so I hope I'm not
drumming on a subject that's been talked to death here.
I've gone ahead and set the default permissions to None, as
suggested. Of course with that set as such, when selecting
Attendees and Resources while creating a meeting request,
they cannot drop a conference room in to the resource. When
they try a dialog box appears stating they do not have the
proper permissions to do so and that they must use the
Required or Optional boxes.
The problem here though is that using anything other then the
Resource box for the conference room will not fire the
auto-accept response. It will just sit there in the
conference room's inbox.
My question is... is it a safe assumption that to get this
to work with only Required or Optional that I would need
Robert Strong's AutoAccept script form ExchangeCode? i.e. --
I cannot use the resource booking script from Outlook2000.
Thanks again for your time.
-KHD
--
Kevin H. Devin
IT Systems Administrator
Alerton Technologies, Inc.
Redmond, WA
-Original Message-
From: Sargent, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 6:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Conference Rooms and such...
See also Q246866
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 7:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Conference Rooms and such...
Yes, Lori Hunter must have the day off or she would be right
in here :)
{Playing the part of Lori Hunter in tonight's performance
will be Ken Powell}
In short, DON'T ALLOW DIRECT BOOKING IF YOU ARE GOING TO USE
THE AUTOACCEPT SCRIPT Allow ONLY Reviewer access if they
need to get into the calendar. If they complain, tell them
that they can not have it both ways and to stop whining.
{How did I do Lori?}
I just got finished fighting this last week. This has been
discussed at quite some length in the last couple of weeks. A
search on auto accept should lead you to it.
The following TechNet articles will show you what I needed to
do to correct it. Q281935 and Q289606.
Ken Powell
Systems Administrator
Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS)
Vancouver, Washington [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658
Fax: (360) 759-6001
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Devin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 1:38 PM
To: Exchange 5.5 List
Subject: Conference Rooms and such...
This past weekend I stumbled across a piece of information
that stated that users should not be allowed to view a
resources calendar by doing a File / Open / Other User's
Folder as it could break the auto-acceptance and cause
corruption. This bit of info also included steps to prevent
this from happening while leaving the remaining functionality intact.
The problem is... I can't remember where I seen this info.
I have gone through the FAQ, the archives, and TechNet, but
am unable to re-locate this info. Would anyone have a clue
as to what I'm referring to and point me in the right
direction? I would greatly appreciate it.
-KHD
--
Kevin H. Devin
IT Systems Administrator
Alerton Technologies, Inc.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http
RE: Conference Rooms and such...
You are correct, but they can not modify anything which as I understand it
is what breaks the damned thing. Reviewer is for those who absolutely must
be able to view the resource for a free time prior to booking it.
I know that they can see all of that under the scheduling tab. Baby steps,
baby steps. It also allows them to be able to go in and print the schedule
for posting.
Ken Powell
Systems Administrator
Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS)
Vancouver, Washington
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658
Fax: (360) 759-6001
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 9:26 PM
To: Exchange 5.5 List
Subject: RE: Conference Rooms and such...
That's all fine, but you can be a reviewer and do a File--Open--Other User's
Folder.
Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer
There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 4:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Conference Rooms and such...
Yes, Lori Hunter must have the day off or she would be right in here :)
{Playing the part of Lori Hunter in tonight's performance will be Ken
Powell}
In short, DON'T ALLOW DIRECT BOOKING IF YOU ARE GOING TO USE THE AUTOACCEPT
SCRIPT Allow ONLY Reviewer access if they need to get into the calendar.
If they complain, tell them that they can not have it both ways and to stop
whining.
{How did I do Lori?}
I just got finished fighting this last week. This has been discussed at
quite some length in the last couple of weeks. A search on auto accept
should lead you to it.
The following TechNet articles will show you what I needed to do to correct
it. Q281935 and Q289606.
Ken Powell
Systems Administrator
Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS)
Vancouver, Washington
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658
Fax: (360) 759-6001
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Devin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 1:38 PM
To: Exchange 5.5 List
Subject: Conference Rooms and such...
This past weekend I stumbled across a piece of information that stated that
users should not be allowed to view a resources calendar by doing a File /
Open / Other User's Folder as it could break the auto-acceptance and cause
corruption. This bit of info also included steps to prevent this from
happening while leaving the remaining functionality intact.
The problem is... I can't remember where I seen this info. I have gone
through the FAQ, the archives, and TechNet, but am unable to re-locate this
info. Would anyone have a clue as to what I'm referring to and point me in
the right direction? I would greatly appreciate it.
-KHD
--
Kevin H. Devin
IT Systems Administrator
Alerton Technologies, Inc.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Conference Rooms and such...
Hi Ken! Been busy. Changed our reply addresses and my exchange
subscription broke. The NT and SMS ones didn't, but this one wouldn't post
my messages until I unsubbed and resubbed again.
No, I don't allow reviewer anymore either. That is what I understand to be
breaking it, as it confuses the client's free busy with the conference
room's free busy (to Ed's point). BUT there is a way to publish the
calendars on an intranet. I'm not sure if that's mentioned on
Slipstick.com, but I'd guess it is.
If not, I have a zip file that I haven't even looked at yet (have you Don?)
that someone sent me to show me how to get the calendars published. If you
need it, you can contact me off-list.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 8:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Conference Rooms and such...
You are correct, but they can not modify anything which as I understand it
is what breaks the damned thing. Reviewer is for those who absolutely must
be able to view the resource for a free time prior to booking it.
I know that they can see all of that under the scheduling tab. Baby steps,
baby steps. It also allows them to be able to go in and print the schedule
for posting.
Ken Powell
Systems Administrator
Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS)
Vancouver, Washington
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658
Fax: (360) 759-6001
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 9:26 PM
To: Exchange 5.5 List
Subject: RE: Conference Rooms and such...
That's all fine, but you can be a reviewer and do a File--Open--Other User's
Folder.
Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer
There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 4:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Conference Rooms and such...
Yes, Lori Hunter must have the day off or she would be right in here :)
{Playing the part of Lori Hunter in tonight's performance will be Ken
Powell}
In short, DON'T ALLOW DIRECT BOOKING IF YOU ARE GOING TO USE THE AUTOACCEPT
SCRIPT Allow ONLY Reviewer access if they need to get into the calendar.
If they complain, tell them that they can not have it both ways and to stop
whining.
{How did I do Lori?}
I just got finished fighting this last week. This has been discussed at
quite some length in the last couple of weeks. A search on auto accept
should lead you to it.
The following TechNet articles will show you what I needed to do to correct
it. Q281935 and Q289606.
Ken Powell
Systems Administrator
Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS)
Vancouver, Washington
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658
Fax: (360) 759-6001
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Devin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 1:38 PM
To: Exchange 5.5 List
Subject: Conference Rooms and such...
This past weekend I stumbled across a piece of information that stated that
users should not be allowed to view a resources calendar by doing a File /
Open / Other User's Folder as it could break the auto-acceptance and cause
corruption. This bit of info also included steps to prevent this from
happening while leaving the remaining functionality intact.
The problem is... I can't remember where I seen this info. I have gone
through the FAQ, the archives, and TechNet, but am unable to re-locate this
info. Would anyone have a clue as to what I'm referring to and point me in
the right direction? I would greatly appreciate it.
-KHD
--
Kevin H. Devin
IT Systems Administrator
Alerton Technologies, Inc.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Conference Rooms and such...
Oh No Reviewer too??? What is this world coming to?
Oh the humanity!!
Well, I guess that I will be busy removing that too. Are you up on OL2K? If
so, how is the resource scheduling working for you. I have a few departments
that are all changed to OL2K or better and I have changed their resources to
the ones native to Outlook. I haven't heard anything back yet. If there were
a problem this guy would call.
Ken Powell
Systems Administrator
Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS)
Vancouver, Washington
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658
Fax: (360) 759-6001
-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 6:44 AM
To: Exchange 5.5 List
Subject: RE: Conference Rooms and such...
Hi Ken! Been busy. Changed our reply addresses and my exchange
subscription broke. The NT and SMS ones didn't, but this one wouldn't post
my messages until I unsubbed and resubbed again.
No, I don't allow reviewer anymore either. That is what I understand to be
breaking it, as it confuses the client's free busy with the conference
room's free busy (to Ed's point). BUT there is a way to publish the
calendars on an intranet. I'm not sure if that's mentioned on
Slipstick.com, but I'd guess it is.
If not, I have a zip file that I haven't even looked at yet (have you Don?)
that someone sent me to show me how to get the calendars published. If you
need it, you can contact me off-list.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 8:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Conference Rooms and such...
You are correct, but they can not modify anything which as I understand it
is what breaks the damned thing. Reviewer is for those who absolutely must
be able to view the resource for a free time prior to booking it.
I know that they can see all of that under the scheduling tab. Baby steps,
baby steps. It also allows them to be able to go in and print the schedule
for posting.
Ken Powell
Systems Administrator
Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS)
Vancouver, Washington
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658
Fax: (360) 759-6001
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 9:26 PM
To: Exchange 5.5 List
Subject: RE: Conference Rooms and such...
That's all fine, but you can be a reviewer and do a File--Open--Other User's
Folder.
Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer
There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 4:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Conference Rooms and such...
Yes, Lori Hunter must have the day off or she would be right in here :)
{Playing the part of Lori Hunter in tonight's performance will be Ken
Powell}
In short, DON'T ALLOW DIRECT BOOKING IF YOU ARE GOING TO USE THE AUTOACCEPT
SCRIPT Allow ONLY Reviewer access if they need to get into the calendar.
If they complain, tell them that they can not have it both ways and to stop
whining.
{How did I do Lori?}
I just got finished fighting this last week. This has been discussed at
quite some length in the last couple of weeks. A search on auto accept
should lead you to it.
The following TechNet articles will show you what I needed to do to correct
it. Q281935 and Q289606.
Ken Powell
Systems Administrator
Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS)
Vancouver, Washington
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658
Fax: (360) 759-6001
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Devin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 1:38 PM
To: Exchange 5.5 List
Subject: Conference Rooms and such...
This past weekend I stumbled across a piece of information that stated that
users should not be allowed to view a resources calendar by doing a File /
Open / Other User's Folder as it could break the auto-acceptance and cause
corruption. This bit of info also included steps to prevent this from
happening while leaving the remaining functionality intact.
The problem is... I can't remember where I seen this info. I have gone
through the FAQ, the archives, and TechNet, but am unable to re-locate this
info. Would anyone have a clue as to what I'm referring to and point me in
the right direction? I would greatly appreciate it.
-KHD
--
Kevin H. Devin
IT Systems Administrator
Alerton Technologies, Inc.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Conference Rooms and such...
OK... I understand. But I'm curious though... If by applying the post-SP4
hotfix for Q289606 that is supposed to correct this problem, would it
still be necessary to limit direct bookings?
-KHD
--
Kevin H. Devin
IT Systems Administrator
Alerton Technologies, Inc.
Redmond, WA
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 4:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Conference Rooms and such...
Yes, Lori Hunter must have the day off or she would be right in here :)
{Playing the part of Lori Hunter in tonight's performance will be Ken
Powell}
In short, DON'T ALLOW DIRECT BOOKING IF YOU ARE GOING TO USE THE AUTOACCEPT
SCRIPT Allow ONLY Reviewer access if they need to get into the calendar.
If they complain, tell them that they can not have it both ways and to stop
whining.
{How did I do Lori?}
I just got finished fighting this last week. This has been discussed at
quite some length in the last couple of weeks. A search on auto accept
should lead you to it.
The following TechNet articles will show you what I needed to do to correct
it. Q281935 and Q289606.
Ken Powell
Systems Administrator
Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS)
Vancouver, Washington
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658
Fax: (360) 759-6001
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Devin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 1:38 PM
To: Exchange 5.5 List
Subject: Conference Rooms and such...
This past weekend I stumbled across a piece of information that stated that
users should not be allowed to view a resources calendar by doing a File /
Open / Other User's Folder as it could break the auto-acceptance and cause
corruption. This bit of info also included steps to prevent this from
happening while leaving the remaining functionality intact.
The problem is... I can't remember where I seen this info. I have gone
through the FAQ, the archives, and TechNet, but am unable to re-locate this
info. Would anyone have a clue as to what I'm referring to and point me in
the right direction? I would greatly appreciate it.
-KHD
--
Kevin H. Devin
IT Systems Administrator
Alerton Technologies, Inc.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Conference Rooms and such...
Yes, those fixes only corrected it so that I could get access back to the
calendar.
Straight from Lori's (not calling you a horse :) ) mouth, NO Direct Booking,
NO Reviewer, Nothin'!!!
Ken Powell
Systems Administrator
Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS)
Vancouver, Washington
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658
Fax: (360) 759-6001
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Devin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 7:40 AM
To: Exchange 5.5 List
Subject: RE: Conference Rooms and such...
OK... I understand. But I'm curious though... If by applying the post-SP4
hotfix for Q289606 that is supposed to correct this problem, would it
still be necessary to limit direct bookings?
-KHD
--
Kevin H. Devin
IT Systems Administrator
Alerton Technologies, Inc.
Redmond, WA
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 4:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Conference Rooms and such...
Yes, Lori Hunter must have the day off or she would be right in here :)
{Playing the part of Lori Hunter in tonight's performance will be Ken
Powell}
In short, DON'T ALLOW DIRECT BOOKING IF YOU ARE GOING TO USE THE AUTOACCEPT
SCRIPT Allow ONLY Reviewer access if they need to get into the calendar.
If they complain, tell them that they can not have it both ways and to stop
whining.
{How did I do Lori?}
I just got finished fighting this last week. This has been discussed at
quite some length in the last couple of weeks. A search on auto accept
should lead you to it.
The following TechNet articles will show you what I needed to do to correct
it. Q281935 and Q289606.
Ken Powell
Systems Administrator
Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS)
Vancouver, Washington
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658
Fax: (360) 759-6001
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Devin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 1:38 PM
To: Exchange 5.5 List
Subject: Conference Rooms and such...
This past weekend I stumbled across a piece of information that stated that
users should not be allowed to view a resources calendar by doing a File /
Open / Other User's Folder as it could break the auto-acceptance and cause
corruption. This bit of info also included steps to prevent this from
happening while leaving the remaining functionality intact.
The problem is... I can't remember where I seen this info. I have gone
through the FAQ, the archives, and TechNet, but am unable to re-locate this
info. Would anyone have a clue as to what I'm referring to and point me in
the right direction? I would greatly appreciate it.
-KHD
--
Kevin H. Devin
IT Systems Administrator
Alerton Technologies, Inc.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Conference Rooms and such...
That fix didn't fix anything for me. YMMV.
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Devin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 9:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Conference Rooms and such...
OK... I understand. But I'm curious though... If by applying the post-SP4
hotfix for Q289606 that is supposed to correct this problem, would it
still be necessary to limit direct bookings?
-KHD
--
Kevin H. Devin
IT Systems Administrator
Alerton Technologies, Inc.
Redmond, WA
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 4:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Conference Rooms and such...
Yes, Lori Hunter must have the day off or she would be right in here :)
{Playing the part of Lori Hunter in tonight's performance will be Ken
Powell}
In short, DON'T ALLOW DIRECT BOOKING IF YOU ARE GOING TO USE THE AUTOACCEPT
SCRIPT Allow ONLY Reviewer access if they need to get into the calendar.
If they complain, tell them that they can not have it both ways and to stop
whining.
{How did I do Lori?}
I just got finished fighting this last week. This has been discussed at
quite some length in the last couple of weeks. A search on auto accept
should lead you to it.
The following TechNet articles will show you what I needed to do to correct
it. Q281935 and Q289606.
Ken Powell
Systems Administrator
Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS)
Vancouver, Washington
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658
Fax: (360) 759-6001
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Devin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 1:38 PM
To: Exchange 5.5 List
Subject: Conference Rooms and such...
This past weekend I stumbled across a piece of information that stated that
users should not be allowed to view a resources calendar by doing a File /
Open / Other User's Folder as it could break the auto-acceptance and cause
corruption. This bit of info also included steps to prevent this from
happening while leaving the remaining functionality intact.
The problem is... I can't remember where I seen this info. I have gone
through the FAQ, the archives, and TechNet, but am unable to re-locate this
info. Would anyone have a clue as to what I'm referring to and point me in
the right direction? I would greatly appreciate it.
-KHD
--
Kevin H. Devin
IT Systems Administrator
Alerton Technologies, Inc.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Conference Rooms and such...
heh heh heh ... OL2K ... heh heh heh ... We're being force-fed an old
version of Netshield from the new 'rents. We are AHEAD of them on e-mail as
we use OL98 and Exchange 5.5 while they are still using OL97 on OpenMail.
They're mostly Novell as well.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 9:12 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Conference Rooms and such...
Oh No Reviewer too??? What is this world coming to?
Oh the humanity!!
Well, I guess that I will be busy removing that too. Are you up on OL2K? If
so, how is the resource scheduling working for you. I have a few departments
that are all changed to OL2K or better and I have changed their resources to
the ones native to Outlook. I haven't heard anything back yet. If there were
a problem this guy would call.
Ken Powell
Systems Administrator
Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS)
Vancouver, Washington
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658
Fax: (360) 759-6001
-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 6:44 AM
To: Exchange 5.5 List
Subject: RE: Conference Rooms and such...
Hi Ken! Been busy. Changed our reply addresses and my exchange
subscription broke. The NT and SMS ones didn't, but this one wouldn't post
my messages until I unsubbed and resubbed again.
No, I don't allow reviewer anymore either. That is what I understand to be
breaking it, as it confuses the client's free busy with the conference
room's free busy (to Ed's point). BUT there is a way to publish the
calendars on an intranet. I'm not sure if that's mentioned on
Slipstick.com, but I'd guess it is.
If not, I have a zip file that I haven't even looked at yet (have you Don?)
that someone sent me to show me how to get the calendars published. If you
need it, you can contact me off-list.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 8:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Conference Rooms and such...
You are correct, but they can not modify anything which as I understand it
is what breaks the damned thing. Reviewer is for those who absolutely must
be able to view the resource for a free time prior to booking it.
I know that they can see all of that under the scheduling tab. Baby steps,
baby steps. It also allows them to be able to go in and print the schedule
for posting.
Ken Powell
Systems Administrator
Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS)
Vancouver, Washington
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658
Fax: (360) 759-6001
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 9:26 PM
To: Exchange 5.5 List
Subject: RE: Conference Rooms and such...
That's all fine, but you can be a reviewer and do a File--Open--Other User's
Folder.
Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer
There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 4:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Conference Rooms and such...
Yes, Lori Hunter must have the day off or she would be right in here :)
{Playing the part of Lori Hunter in tonight's performance will be Ken
Powell}
In short, DON'T ALLOW DIRECT BOOKING IF YOU ARE GOING TO USE THE AUTOACCEPT
SCRIPT Allow ONLY Reviewer access if they need to get into the calendar.
If they complain, tell them that they can not have it both ways and to stop
whining.
{How did I do Lori?}
I just got finished fighting this last week. This has been discussed at
quite some length in the last couple of weeks. A search on auto accept
should lead you to it.
The following TechNet articles will show you what I needed to do to correct
it. Q281935 and Q289606.
Ken Powell
Systems Administrator
Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS)
Vancouver, Washington
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658
Fax: (360) 759-6001
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Devin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 1:38 PM
To: Exchange 5.5 List
Subject: Conference Rooms and such...
This past weekend I stumbled across a piece of information that stated that
users should not be allowed to view a resources calendar by doing a File /
Open / Other User's Folder as it could break the auto-acceptance and cause
corruption. This bit of info also included steps to prevent this from
happening while leaving the remaining functionality intact.
The problem is... I can't remember where I seen this info. I have gone
through the FAQ, the archives, and TechNet, but am unable to re-locate this
info. Would anyone have a clue as to what I'm referring to and point me in
the right direction? I would greatly appreciate it.
-KHD
--
Kevin H. Devin
IT Systems
RE: Conference Rooms and such...
See also Q246866
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 7:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Conference Rooms and such...
Yes, Lori Hunter must have the day off or she would be right in here :)
{Playing the part of Lori Hunter in tonight's performance will be Ken
Powell}
In short, DON'T ALLOW DIRECT BOOKING IF YOU ARE GOING TO USE THE AUTOACCEPT
SCRIPT Allow ONLY Reviewer access if they need to get into the calendar.
If they complain, tell them that they can not have it both ways and to stop
whining.
{How did I do Lori?}
I just got finished fighting this last week. This has been discussed at
quite some length in the last couple of weeks. A search on auto accept
should lead you to it.
The following TechNet articles will show you what I needed to do to correct
it. Q281935 and Q289606.
Ken Powell
Systems Administrator
Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS)
Vancouver, Washington
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658
Fax: (360) 759-6001
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Devin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 1:38 PM
To: Exchange 5.5 List
Subject: Conference Rooms and such...
This past weekend I stumbled across a piece of information that stated that
users should not be allowed to view a resources calendar by doing a File /
Open / Other User's Folder as it could break the auto-acceptance and cause
corruption. This bit of info also included steps to prevent this from
happening while leaving the remaining functionality intact.
The problem is... I can't remember where I seen this info. I have gone
through the FAQ, the archives, and TechNet, but am unable to re-locate this
info. Would anyone have a clue as to what I'm referring to and point me in
the right direction? I would greatly appreciate it.
-KHD
--
Kevin H. Devin
IT Systems Administrator
Alerton Technologies, Inc.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Conference Rooms and such...
Yep... that the Q article that I had seen this past weekend.
Thanks a bunch for everyone's help, I really appreciate it.
I still have a couple of questions, so I hope I'm not drumming on a subject
that's been talked to death here.
I've gone ahead and set the default permissions to None, as suggested. Of
course with that set as such, when selecting Attendees and Resources while
creating a meeting request, they cannot drop a conference room in to the
resource. When they try a dialog box appears stating they do not have the
proper permissions to do so and that they must use the Required or
Optional boxes.
The problem here though is that using anything other then the Resource box
for the conference room will not fire the auto-accept response. It will
just sit there in the conference room's inbox.
My question is... is it a safe assumption that to get this to work with
only Required or Optional that I would need Robert Strong's AutoAccept
script form ExchangeCode? i.e. -- I cannot use the resource booking script
from Outlook2000.
Thanks again for your time.
-KHD
--
Kevin H. Devin
IT Systems Administrator
Alerton Technologies, Inc.
Redmond, WA
-Original Message-
From: Sargent, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 6:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Conference Rooms and such...
See also Q246866
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 7:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Conference Rooms and such...
Yes, Lori Hunter must have the day off or she would be right in here :)
{Playing the part of Lori Hunter in tonight's performance will be Ken
Powell}
In short, DON'T ALLOW DIRECT BOOKING IF YOU ARE GOING TO USE THE AUTOACCEPT
SCRIPT Allow ONLY Reviewer access if they need to get into the calendar.
If they complain, tell them that they can not have it both ways and to stop
whining.
{How did I do Lori?}
I just got finished fighting this last week. This has been discussed at
quite some length in the last couple of weeks. A search on auto accept
should lead you to it.
The following TechNet articles will show you what I needed to do to correct
it. Q281935 and Q289606.
Ken Powell
Systems Administrator
Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS)
Vancouver, Washington
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658
Fax: (360) 759-6001
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Devin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 1:38 PM
To: Exchange 5.5 List
Subject: Conference Rooms and such...
This past weekend I stumbled across a piece of information that stated that
users should not be allowed to view a resources calendar by doing a File /
Open / Other User's Folder as it could break the auto-acceptance and cause
corruption. This bit of info also included steps to prevent this from
happening while leaving the remaining functionality intact.
The problem is... I can't remember where I seen this info. I have gone
through the FAQ, the archives, and TechNet, but am unable to re-locate this
info. Would anyone have a clue as to what I'm referring to and point me in
the right direction? I would greatly appreciate it.
-KHD
--
Kevin H. Devin
IT Systems Administrator
Alerton Technologies, Inc.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Conference Rooms and such...
Mr. Strong's script has no such limitation on how you address the resources.
Optional, required, resource, whatever - it all works a treat.
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Devin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 1:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Conference Rooms and such...
Yep... that the Q article that I had seen this past weekend.
Thanks a bunch for everyone's help, I really appreciate it.
I still have a couple of questions, so I hope I'm not drumming on a subject
that's been talked to death here.
I've gone ahead and set the default permissions to None, as suggested. Of
course with that set as such, when selecting Attendees and Resources while
creating a meeting request, they cannot drop a conference room in to the
resource. When they try a dialog box appears stating they do not have the
proper permissions to do so and that they must use the Required or
Optional boxes.
The problem here though is that using anything other then the Resource box
for the conference room will not fire the auto-accept response. It will
just sit there in the conference room's inbox.
My question is... is it a safe assumption that to get this to work with
only Required or Optional that I would need Robert Strong's AutoAccept
script form ExchangeCode? i.e. -- I cannot use the resource booking script
from Outlook2000.
Thanks again for your time.
-KHD
--
Kevin H. Devin
IT Systems Administrator
Alerton Technologies, Inc.
Redmond, WA
-Original Message-
From: Sargent, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 6:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Conference Rooms and such...
See also Q246866
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 7:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Conference Rooms and such...
Yes, Lori Hunter must have the day off or she would be right in here :)
{Playing the part of Lori Hunter in tonight's performance will be Ken
Powell}
In short, DON'T ALLOW DIRECT BOOKING IF YOU ARE GOING TO USE THE AUTOACCEPT
SCRIPT Allow ONLY Reviewer access if they need to get into the calendar.
If they complain, tell them that they can not have it both ways and to stop
whining.
{How did I do Lori?}
I just got finished fighting this last week. This has been discussed at
quite some length in the last couple of weeks. A search on auto accept
should lead you to it.
The following TechNet articles will show you what I needed to do to correct
it. Q281935 and Q289606.
Ken Powell
Systems Administrator
Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS)
Vancouver, Washington
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658
Fax: (360) 759-6001
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Devin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 1:38 PM
To: Exchange 5.5 List
Subject: Conference Rooms and such...
This past weekend I stumbled across a piece of information that stated that
users should not be allowed to view a resources calendar by doing a File /
Open / Other User's Folder as it could break the auto-acceptance and cause
corruption. This bit of info also included steps to prevent this from
happening while leaving the remaining functionality intact.
The problem is... I can't remember where I seen this info. I have gone
through the FAQ, the archives, and TechNet, but am unable to re-locate this
info. Would anyone have a clue as to what I'm referring to and point me in
the right direction? I would greatly appreciate it.
-KHD
--
Kevin H. Devin
IT Systems Administrator
Alerton Technologies, Inc.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Conference Rooms and such...
Yes, Lori Hunter must have the day off or she would be right in here :)
{Playing the part of Lori Hunter in tonight's performance will be Ken
Powell}
In short, DON'T ALLOW DIRECT BOOKING IF YOU ARE GOING TO USE THE AUTOACCEPT
SCRIPT Allow ONLY Reviewer access if they need to get into the calendar.
If they complain, tell them that they can not have it both ways and to stop
whining.
{How did I do Lori?}
I just got finished fighting this last week. This has been discussed at
quite some length in the last couple of weeks. A search on auto accept
should lead you to it.
The following TechNet articles will show you what I needed to do to correct
it. Q281935 and Q289606.
Ken Powell
Systems Administrator
Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS)
Vancouver, Washington
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658
Fax: (360) 759-6001
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Devin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 1:38 PM
To: Exchange 5.5 List
Subject: Conference Rooms and such...
This past weekend I stumbled across a piece of information that stated that
users should not be allowed to view a resources calendar by doing a File /
Open / Other User's Folder as it could break the auto-acceptance and cause
corruption. This bit of info also included steps to prevent this from
happening while leaving the remaining functionality intact.
The problem is... I can't remember where I seen this info. I have gone
through the FAQ, the archives, and TechNet, but am unable to re-locate this
info. Would anyone have a clue as to what I'm referring to and point me in
the right direction? I would greatly appreciate it.
-KHD
--
Kevin H. Devin
IT Systems Administrator
Alerton Technologies, Inc.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Conference Rooms and such...
That's all fine, but you can be a reviewer and do a File--Open--Other User's
Folder.
Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer
There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 4:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Conference Rooms and such...
Yes, Lori Hunter must have the day off or she would be right in here :)
{Playing the part of Lori Hunter in tonight's performance will be Ken
Powell}
In short, DON'T ALLOW DIRECT BOOKING IF YOU ARE GOING TO USE THE AUTOACCEPT
SCRIPT Allow ONLY Reviewer access if they need to get into the calendar.
If they complain, tell them that they can not have it both ways and to stop
whining.
{How did I do Lori?}
I just got finished fighting this last week. This has been discussed at
quite some length in the last couple of weeks. A search on auto accept
should lead you to it.
The following TechNet articles will show you what I needed to do to correct
it. Q281935 and Q289606.
Ken Powell
Systems Administrator
Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS)
Vancouver, Washington
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658
Fax: (360) 759-6001
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Devin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 1:38 PM
To: Exchange 5.5 List
Subject: Conference Rooms and such...
This past weekend I stumbled across a piece of information that stated that
users should not be allowed to view a resources calendar by doing a File /
Open / Other User's Folder as it could break the auto-acceptance and cause
corruption. This bit of info also included steps to prevent this from
happening while leaving the remaining functionality intact.
The problem is... I can't remember where I seen this info. I have gone
through the FAQ, the archives, and TechNet, but am unable to re-locate this
info. Would anyone have a clue as to what I'm referring to and point me in
the right direction? I would greatly appreciate it.
-KHD
--
Kevin H. Devin
IT Systems Administrator
Alerton Technologies, Inc.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
