RE: I'm confused now!
Here's what I've found out after a 6 hour call to Micrsoft yesterday: 1. Connection agreements must be two way when adding an E2k server in a 5.5 site. 2. Trust relationships between all domains involved must be two-way (and functioning fully!) My problem was that the trust relationship between my AD domain and my MSX5.5 domain was poked. The AD domain controller could see the trust, but member servers could not. Deleting the trust and recreating fixed the problem (well, the SRS install problem, anyway). My new question: Where is the requirement for two-way trust documented? I don't remember ever coming across it in any of the migration papers. -Original Message- From: Marc MEshurle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, February 02, 2002 1:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I'm confused now! I am running into the same problem. Have a W2K Ad setup running MSX5.5sp4. Installed a new server W2K adv svr and installed E2K adv srv. According to tech docs, I need to have a two way AD connector in my MSX5.5 srv before I can move the mailbox from the MSX5.5 to the E2K adv directory. I have one-way running, but cannot move the mailboxes. Any suggestions? > No, you do not need to do that. > > Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I > Tech Consultant > Compaq Computer Corporation > Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ken Cornetet > Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 11:18 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: I'm confused now! > > > Of course. What I meant was: do I need to upgrade my EXCHANGEX NT4 > domain (where the MSX 5.5 server lives) to mixed-mode AD and install the > E2K server in the EXCHANGEX domain (now AD) before I can join the MSX5.5 > org and site? The MSX5.5 server is in the EXCHANGEX domain and uses an > EXCHANGEX domain user ID as the service account. > > I've got plenty of books, and white-papers stacked to the ceiling. I've > read most of the win2k and E2k resource kit books, and I've read > planning papers until my eyes are blurry. > > My original plan was to leave the EXCHANGEX NT4 domain and it's MSX 5.5 > server alone and install the E2K server in my AD domain KII > (kii.kimball.com) (this is where the user accounts all live). Then, I'd > move the mailboxes from the MSX 5.5 server to the E2K server and retire > the MSX 5.5 server and the EXCHANGEX domain. > > From all the planning guides and white papers I've seen, this should be > a viable strategy. However, my E2K install is failing with an error > "0xc0070534: No mapping between account names and security IDs was done" > when installing SRS. > > My general plan of attack: > > 1. Install empty root domain (ads.kimball.com) creating forest. 2. > Install ADC 3. Forestprep 4. Upgrade NT 4 domain KII (master user > domain) to AD (kii.kimball.com) 5. DomainPrep both domains. 6. Create > *one-way* CA from MSX5.5 server to kii.kimball.com > 7. Install E2K server in the *kii.kimball.com* domain joining the MSX5.5 > org and site. 8. Move mailboxes from 5.5 server to E2K server 9. Retire > 5.5 server (carefully paying attention to first server in site > issues) > 10. Retire NT 4 EXCHANGEX domain. > > Note that my MSX5.5 server would be in the NT4 domain EXCHANGEX and my > E2K server would be in kii.kimball.com. Would this prevent me from > adding an E2K server to my MSX5.5 org and site? > > I am confused on a couple of points: > 1. Q270143 says that in mixed mode exchange *all* servers must use the > same "service account". Since E2K doesn't use a "service account", what > are they talking about? Should the E2K Exchange services run as the > MSX5.5 service account user ID instead of the system account? > > 2. The paper titled "Microsoft Exchange 2000 Internals: Installation and > Setup" says I need a *two-way* connection agreement between MSX5.5 and > AD. I did not think a two-way agreement was required. > > -Original Message- > From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 12:33 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: I'm confused now! > > > > Your Exchange 2000 server CANNOT be in your NT 4.0 domain because it > must be in an Active Directory domain. > > I can tell that this question is just the beginning of a long series of > questions. I advise you to pick up a good Exchange 2000 book like Tony > Redmond's and start reading, because you have a lot of necessary > foundation work. > > Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I > Tech Consultant > Compaq Computer Corporation > Protecting th
RE: I'm confused now!
Make a two-way connection agreement? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Marc MEshurle Sent: Saturday, February 02, 2002 10:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I'm confused now! I am running into the same problem. Have a W2K Ad setup running MSX5.5sp4. Installed a new server W2K adv svr and installed E2K adv srv. According to tech docs, I need to have a two way AD connector in my MSX5.5 srv before I can move the mailbox from the MSX5.5 to the E2K adv directory. I have one-way running, but cannot move the mailboxes. Any suggestions? > No, you do not need to do that. > > Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I > Tech Consultant > Compaq Computer Corporation > Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ken Cornetet > Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 11:18 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: I'm confused now! > > > Of course. What I meant was: do I need to upgrade my EXCHANGEX NT4 > domain (where the MSX 5.5 server lives) to mixed-mode AD and install > the E2K server in the EXCHANGEX domain (now AD) before I can join the > MSX5.5 org and site? The MSX5.5 server is in the EXCHANGEX domain and > uses an EXCHANGEX domain user ID as the service account. > > I've got plenty of books, and white-papers stacked to the ceiling. > I've read most of the win2k and E2k resource kit books, and I've read > planning papers until my eyes are blurry. > > My original plan was to leave the EXCHANGEX NT4 domain and it's MSX > 5.5 server alone and install the E2K server in my AD domain KII > (kii.kimball.com) (this is where the user accounts all live). Then, > I'd move the mailboxes from the MSX 5.5 server to the E2K server and > retire the MSX 5.5 server and the EXCHANGEX domain. > > From all the planning guides and white papers I've seen, this should > be a viable strategy. However, my E2K install is failing with an error > "0xc0070534: No mapping between account names and security IDs was > done" when installing SRS. > > My general plan of attack: > > 1. Install empty root domain (ads.kimball.com) creating forest. 2. > Install ADC 3. Forestprep 4. Upgrade NT 4 domain KII (master user > domain) to AD (kii.kimball.com) 5. DomainPrep both domains. 6. Create > *one-way* CA from MSX5.5 server to kii.kimball.com > 7. Install E2K server in the *kii.kimball.com* domain joining the MSX5.5 > org and site. 8. Move mailboxes from 5.5 server to E2K server 9. Retire > 5.5 server (carefully paying attention to first server in site > issues) > 10. Retire NT 4 EXCHANGEX domain. > > Note that my MSX5.5 server would be in the NT4 domain EXCHANGEX and my > E2K server would be in kii.kimball.com. Would this prevent me from > adding an E2K server to my MSX5.5 org and site? > > I am confused on a couple of points: > 1. Q270143 says that in mixed mode exchange *all* servers must use the > same "service account". Since E2K doesn't use a "service account", > what are they talking about? Should the E2K Exchange services run as > the MSX5.5 service account user ID instead of the system account? > > 2. The paper titled "Microsoft Exchange 2000 Internals: Installation > and Setup" says I need a *two-way* connection agreement between MSX5.5 > and AD. I did not think a two-way agreement was required. > > -Original Message- > From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 12:33 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: I'm confused now! > > > > Your Exchange 2000 server CANNOT be in your NT 4.0 domain because it > must be in an Active Directory domain. > > I can tell that this question is just the beginning of a long series > of questions. I advise you to pick up a good Exchange 2000 book like > Tony Redmond's and start reading, because you have a lot of necessary > foundation work. > > Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I > Tech Consultant > Compaq Computer Corporation > Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ken Cornetet > Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 9:16 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: I'm confused now! > > > My existing MSX 5.5 server is in an NT4 domain called "EXCHANGEX". I'm > wanting to install an E2K server in kii.kimball.com (netbi
RE: I'm confused now!
I am running into the same problem. Have a W2K Ad setup running MSX5.5sp4. Installed a new server W2K adv svr and installed E2K adv srv. According to tech docs, I need to have a two way AD connector in my MSX5.5 srv before I can move the mailbox from the MSX5.5 to the E2K adv directory. I have one-way running, but cannot move the mailboxes. Any suggestions? > No, you do not need to do that. > > Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I > Tech Consultant > Compaq Computer Corporation > Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ken Cornetet > Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 11:18 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: I'm confused now! > > > Of course. What I meant was: do I need to upgrade my EXCHANGEX NT4 > domain (where the MSX 5.5 server lives) to mixed-mode AD and install the > E2K server in the EXCHANGEX domain (now AD) before I can join the MSX5.5 > org and site? The MSX5.5 server is in the EXCHANGEX domain and uses an > EXCHANGEX domain user ID as the service account. > > I've got plenty of books, and white-papers stacked to the ceiling. I've > read most of the win2k and E2k resource kit books, and I've read > planning papers until my eyes are blurry. > > My original plan was to leave the EXCHANGEX NT4 domain and it's MSX 5.5 > server alone and install the E2K server in my AD domain KII > (kii.kimball.com) (this is where the user accounts all live). Then, I'd > move the mailboxes from the MSX 5.5 server to the E2K server and retire > the MSX 5.5 server and the EXCHANGEX domain. > > From all the planning guides and white papers I've seen, this should be > a viable strategy. However, my E2K install is failing with an error > "0xc0070534: No mapping between account names and security IDs was done" > when installing SRS. > > My general plan of attack: > > 1. Install empty root domain (ads.kimball.com) creating forest. 2. > Install ADC 3. Forestprep 4. Upgrade NT 4 domain KII (master user > domain) to AD (kii.kimball.com) 5. DomainPrep both domains. 6. Create > *one-way* CA from MSX5.5 server to kii.kimball.com > 7. Install E2K server in the *kii.kimball.com* domain joining the MSX5.5 > org and site. 8. Move mailboxes from 5.5 server to E2K server 9. Retire > 5.5 server (carefully paying attention to first server in site > issues) > 10. Retire NT 4 EXCHANGEX domain. > > Note that my MSX5.5 server would be in the NT4 domain EXCHANGEX and my > E2K server would be in kii.kimball.com. Would this prevent me from > adding an E2K server to my MSX5.5 org and site? > > I am confused on a couple of points: > 1. Q270143 says that in mixed mode exchange *all* servers must use the > same "service account". Since E2K doesn't use a "service account", what > are they talking about? Should the E2K Exchange services run as the > MSX5.5 service account user ID instead of the system account? > > 2. The paper titled "Microsoft Exchange 2000 Internals: Installation and > Setup" says I need a *two-way* connection agreement between MSX5.5 and > AD. I did not think a two-way agreement was required. > > -Original Message- > From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 12:33 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: I'm confused now! > > > > Your Exchange 2000 server CANNOT be in your NT 4.0 domain because it > must be in an Active Directory domain. > > I can tell that this question is just the beginning of a long series of > questions. I advise you to pick up a good Exchange 2000 book like Tony > Redmond's and start reading, because you have a lot of necessary > foundation work. > > Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I > Tech Consultant > Compaq Computer Corporation > Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ken Cornetet > Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 9:16 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: I'm confused now! > > > My existing MSX 5.5 server is in an NT4 domain called "EXCHANGEX". I'm > wanting to install an E2K server in kii.kimball.com (netbios name kii). > I want to join the E2K to the MSX 5.5 org and site so that I can move > mailboxes. Will this not work? Does my E2K server have to be in the > EXCHANGEX domain? Please tell me it doesn't have to be... > > -Original Message- > From: Walt Brannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 11:56 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > S
RE: I'm confused now!
Reread the advice you cite. You might need at least one domain in native mode so you can create universal security groups for migrating public folder permissions. If that isn't of concern to you, then you don't need any domains in native mode. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Adam Romain Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 8:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I'm confused now! Great. So if in a Org you have two domains, each a separate site and I was to upgrade one domain to win2k and then upgrade ex5.5 to 2k I wouldn't need to make it win2k native for that domain ? i.e. Org Site 1 is NT4.0 / Ex5.5 a site connector with replication. Site 2 is mixed mode ( 1 NT4.0 BDC with ex5.5 and 1 win2k ADS with ex5.5 ) with the intention to decommission the BDC to have 1 server being win2k/ex2k. Ta, Adam -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 February 2002 16:07 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I'm confused now! Again, that is not a requirement. It does make migration of public folder permissions work better. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Adam Romain Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 2:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I'm confused now! Not at all. Still, I'm learning the hard way (due to go on course in a few weeks though) What I was trying to get at is that you need to ensure that at least one domain in the forest is in native mode. I got this information from the whitepaper titled 'in place upgrade from 5.5 to ex2k' from the pre-requisites section. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 01 February 2002 17:37 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I'm confused now! Sure about that? -Original Message- From: Adam Romain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 12:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I'm confused now! Exchange 2k can only run one there is at least one win2k server running in Native mode in your domain. -Original Message- From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 01 February 2002 17:16 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I'm confused now! My existing MSX 5.5 server is in an NT4 domain called "EXCHANGEX". I'm wanting to install an E2K server in kii.kimball.com (netbios name kii). I want to join the E2K to the MSX 5.5 org and site so that I can move mailboxes. Will this not work? Does my E2K server have to be in the EXCHANGEX domain? Please tell me it doesn't have to be... -Original Message- From: Walt Brannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I'm confused now! Mixed mode includes 5.5 servers too. I guess they mean all the 5.5 servers must be running the same SA. Walt >-Original Message- >From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 10:29 AM >To: Exchange Discussions >Subject: I'm confused now! > >I mean even more confused than normal... > >I've been searching Q articles trying to find a way to fix my >aforementioned problem and ran across Q270143 which describes the >limitations of running >exchange in mixed mode. The following is stated: > >"for example, all servers in the site must use a common service account. " > >Huh? E2K doesn't use a "service account", does it? Am I missing something? > >_ >List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm >Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp >To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidenti
RE: I'm confused now!
Great. So if in a Org you have two domains, each a separate site and I was to upgrade one domain to win2k and then upgrade ex5.5 to 2k I wouldn't need to make it win2k native for that domain ? i.e. Org Site 1 is NT4.0 / Ex5.5 a site connector with replication. Site 2 is mixed mode ( 1 NT4.0 BDC with ex5.5 and 1 win2k ADS with ex5.5 ) with the intention to decommission the BDC to have 1 server being win2k/ex2k. Ta, Adam -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 February 2002 16:07 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I'm confused now! Again, that is not a requirement. It does make migration of public folder permissions work better. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Adam Romain Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 2:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I'm confused now! Not at all. Still, I'm learning the hard way (due to go on course in a few weeks though) What I was trying to get at is that you need to ensure that at least one domain in the forest is in native mode. I got this information from the whitepaper titled 'in place upgrade from 5.5 to ex2k' from the pre-requisites section. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 01 February 2002 17:37 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I'm confused now! Sure about that? -Original Message- From: Adam Romain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 12:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I'm confused now! Exchange 2k can only run one there is at least one win2k server running in Native mode in your domain. -Original Message- From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 01 February 2002 17:16 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I'm confused now! My existing MSX 5.5 server is in an NT4 domain called "EXCHANGEX". I'm wanting to install an E2K server in kii.kimball.com (netbios name kii). I want to join the E2K to the MSX 5.5 org and site so that I can move mailboxes. Will this not work? Does my E2K server have to be in the EXCHANGEX domain? Please tell me it doesn't have to be... -Original Message- From: Walt Brannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I'm confused now! Mixed mode includes 5.5 servers too. I guess they mean all the 5.5 servers must be running the same SA. Walt >-Original Message- >From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 10:29 AM >To: Exchange Discussions >Subject: I'm confused now! > >I mean even more confused than normal... > >I've been searching Q articles trying to find a way to fix my >aforementioned problem and ran across Q270143 which describes the >limitations of running >exchange in mixed mode. The following is stated: > >"for example, all servers in the site must use a common service account. " > >Huh? E2K doesn't use a "service account", does it? Am I missing something? > >_ >List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm >Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp >To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. Network Defence Ltd ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Th
RE: I'm confused now!
Again, that is not a requirement. It does make migration of public folder permissions work better. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Adam Romain Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 2:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I'm confused now! Not at all. Still, I'm learning the hard way (due to go on course in a few weeks though) What I was trying to get at is that you need to ensure that at least one domain in the forest is in native mode. I got this information from the whitepaper titled 'in place upgrade from 5.5 to ex2k' from the pre-requisites section. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 01 February 2002 17:37 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I'm confused now! Sure about that? -Original Message- From: Adam Romain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 12:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I'm confused now! Exchange 2k can only run one there is at least one win2k server running in Native mode in your domain. -Original Message- From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 01 February 2002 17:16 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I'm confused now! My existing MSX 5.5 server is in an NT4 domain called "EXCHANGEX". I'm wanting to install an E2K server in kii.kimball.com (netbios name kii). I want to join the E2K to the MSX 5.5 org and site so that I can move mailboxes. Will this not work? Does my E2K server have to be in the EXCHANGEX domain? Please tell me it doesn't have to be... -Original Message- From: Walt Brannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I'm confused now! Mixed mode includes 5.5 servers too. I guess they mean all the 5.5 servers must be running the same SA. Walt >-Original Message- >From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 10:29 AM >To: Exchange Discussions >Subject: I'm confused now! > >I mean even more confused than normal... > >I've been searching Q articles trying to find a way to fix my >aforementioned problem and ran across Q270143 which describes the >limitations of running >exchange in mixed mode. The following is stated: > >"for example, all servers in the site must use a common service account. " > >Huh? E2K doesn't use a "service account", does it? Am I missing something? > >_ >List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm >Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp >To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. Network Defence Ltd ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. =
RE: I'm confused now!
Not at all. Still, I'm learning the hard way (due to go on course in a few weeks though) What I was trying to get at is that you need to ensure that at least one domain in the forest is in native mode. I got this information from the whitepaper titled 'in place upgrade from 5.5 to ex2k' from the pre-requisites section. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 01 February 2002 17:37 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I'm confused now! Sure about that? -Original Message- From: Adam Romain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 12:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I'm confused now! Exchange 2k can only run one there is at least one win2k server running in Native mode in your domain. -Original Message- From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 01 February 2002 17:16 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I'm confused now! My existing MSX 5.5 server is in an NT4 domain called "EXCHANGEX". I'm wanting to install an E2K server in kii.kimball.com (netbios name kii). I want to join the E2K to the MSX 5.5 org and site so that I can move mailboxes. Will this not work? Does my E2K server have to be in the EXCHANGEX domain? Please tell me it doesn't have to be... -Original Message- From: Walt Brannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I'm confused now! Mixed mode includes 5.5 servers too. I guess they mean all the 5.5 servers must be running the same SA. Walt >-Original Message- >From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 10:29 AM >To: Exchange Discussions >Subject: I'm confused now! > >I mean even more confused than normal... > >I've been searching Q articles trying to find a way to fix my >aforementioned problem and ran across Q270143 which describes the >limitations of running >exchange in mixed mode. The following is stated: > >"for example, all servers in the site must use a common service account. " > >Huh? E2K doesn't use a "service account", does it? Am I missing something? > >_ >List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm >Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp >To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. Network Defence Ltd ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exc
RE: I'm confused now!
No, you do not need to do that. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ken Cornetet Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 11:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I'm confused now! Of course. What I meant was: do I need to upgrade my EXCHANGEX NT4 domain (where the MSX 5.5 server lives) to mixed-mode AD and install the E2K server in the EXCHANGEX domain (now AD) before I can join the MSX5.5 org and site? The MSX5.5 server is in the EXCHANGEX domain and uses an EXCHANGEX domain user ID as the service account. I've got plenty of books, and white-papers stacked to the ceiling. I've read most of the win2k and E2k resource kit books, and I've read planning papers until my eyes are blurry. My original plan was to leave the EXCHANGEX NT4 domain and it's MSX 5.5 server alone and install the E2K server in my AD domain KII (kii.kimball.com) (this is where the user accounts all live). Then, I'd move the mailboxes from the MSX 5.5 server to the E2K server and retire the MSX 5.5 server and the EXCHANGEX domain. >From all the planning guides and white papers I've seen, this should be a viable strategy. However, my E2K install is failing with an error "0xc0070534: No mapping between account names and security IDs was done" when installing SRS. My general plan of attack: 1. Install empty root domain (ads.kimball.com) creating forest. 2. Install ADC 3. Forestprep 4. Upgrade NT 4 domain KII (master user domain) to AD (kii.kimball.com) 5. DomainPrep both domains. 6. Create *one-way* CA from MSX5.5 server to kii.kimball.com 7. Install E2K server in the *kii.kimball.com* domain joining the MSX5.5 org and site. 8. Move mailboxes from 5.5 server to E2K server 9. Retire 5.5 server (carefully paying attention to first server in site issues) 10. Retire NT 4 EXCHANGEX domain. Note that my MSX5.5 server would be in the NT4 domain EXCHANGEX and my E2K server would be in kii.kimball.com. Would this prevent me from adding an E2K server to my MSX5.5 org and site? I am confused on a couple of points: 1. Q270143 says that in mixed mode exchange *all* servers must use the same "service account". Since E2K doesn't use a "service account", what are they talking about? Should the E2K Exchange services run as the MSX5.5 service account user ID instead of the system account? 2. The paper titled "Microsoft Exchange 2000 Internals: Installation and Setup" says I need a *two-way* connection agreement between MSX5.5 and AD. I did not think a two-way agreement was required. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 12:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I'm confused now! Your Exchange 2000 server CANNOT be in your NT 4.0 domain because it must be in an Active Directory domain. I can tell that this question is just the beginning of a long series of questions. I advise you to pick up a good Exchange 2000 book like Tony Redmond's and start reading, because you have a lot of necessary foundation work. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ken Cornetet Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 9:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I'm confused now! My existing MSX 5.5 server is in an NT4 domain called "EXCHANGEX". I'm wanting to install an E2K server in kii.kimball.com (netbios name kii). I want to join the E2K to the MSX 5.5 org and site so that I can move mailboxes. Will this not work? Does my E2K server have to be in the EXCHANGEX domain? Please tell me it doesn't have to be... -Original Message- From: Walt Brannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I'm confused now! Mixed mode includes 5.5 servers too. I guess they mean all the 5.5 servers must be running the same SA. Walt >-Original Message- >From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 10:29 AM >To: Exchange Discussions >Subject: I'm confused now! > >I mean even more confused than normal... > >I've been searching Q articles trying to find a way to fix my >aforementioned problem and ran across Q270143 which describes the >limitations of running >exchange in mixed mode. The following is stated: > >"for example, all servers in the site must use a common service account. " > >Huh? E2K doesn't use a "service account", does it? Am I missing something? > >__
RE: I'm confused now!
Of course. What I meant was: do I need to upgrade my EXCHANGEX NT4 domain (where the MSX 5.5 server lives) to mixed-mode AD and install the E2K server in the EXCHANGEX domain (now AD) before I can join the MSX5.5 org and site? The MSX5.5 server is in the EXCHANGEX domain and uses an EXCHANGEX domain user ID as the service account. I've got plenty of books, and white-papers stacked to the ceiling. I've read most of the win2k and E2k resource kit books, and I've read planning papers until my eyes are blurry. My original plan was to leave the EXCHANGEX NT4 domain and it's MSX 5.5 server alone and install the E2K server in my AD domain KII (kii.kimball.com) (this is where the user accounts all live). Then, I'd move the mailboxes from the MSX 5.5 server to the E2K server and retire the MSX 5.5 server and the EXCHANGEX domain. >From all the planning guides and white papers I've seen, this should be a viable strategy. However, my E2K install is failing with an error "0xc0070534: No mapping between account names and security IDs was done" when installing SRS. My general plan of attack: 1. Install empty root domain (ads.kimball.com) creating forest. 2. Install ADC 3. Forestprep 4. Upgrade NT 4 domain KII (master user domain) to AD (kii.kimball.com) 5. DomainPrep both domains. 6. Create *one-way* CA from MSX5.5 server to kii.kimball.com 7. Install E2K server in the *kii.kimball.com* domain joining the MSX5.5 org and site. 8. Move mailboxes from 5.5 server to E2K server 9. Retire 5.5 server (carefully paying attention to first server in site issues) 10. Retire NT 4 EXCHANGEX domain. Note that my MSX5.5 server would be in the NT4 domain EXCHANGEX and my E2K server would be in kii.kimball.com. Would this prevent me from adding an E2K server to my MSX5.5 org and site? I am confused on a couple of points: 1. Q270143 says that in mixed mode exchange *all* servers must use the same "service account". Since E2K doesn't use a "service account", what are they talking about? Should the E2K Exchange services run as the MSX5.5 service account user ID instead of the system account? 2. The paper titled "Microsoft Exchange 2000 Internals: Installation and Setup" says I need a *two-way* connection agreement between MSX5.5 and AD. I did not think a two-way agreement was required. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 12:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I'm confused now! Your Exchange 2000 server CANNOT be in your NT 4.0 domain because it must be in an Active Directory domain. I can tell that this question is just the beginning of a long series of questions. I advise you to pick up a good Exchange 2000 book like Tony Redmond's and start reading, because you have a lot of necessary foundation work. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ken Cornetet Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 9:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I'm confused now! My existing MSX 5.5 server is in an NT4 domain called "EXCHANGEX". I'm wanting to install an E2K server in kii.kimball.com (netbios name kii). I want to join the E2K to the MSX 5.5 org and site so that I can move mailboxes. Will this not work? Does my E2K server have to be in the EXCHANGEX domain? Please tell me it doesn't have to be... -Original Message- From: Walt Brannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I'm confused now! Mixed mode includes 5.5 servers too. I guess they mean all the 5.5 servers must be running the same SA. Walt >-Original Message- >From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 10:29 AM >To: Exchange Discussions >Subject: I'm confused now! > >I mean even more confused than normal... > >I've been searching Q articles trying to find a way to fix my >aforementioned problem and ran across Q270143 which describes the >limitations of running >exchange in mixed mode. The following is stated: > >"for example, all servers in the site must use a common service account. " > >Huh? E2K doesn't use a "service account", does it? Am I missing something? > >_ >List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm >Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp >To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List
RE: I'm confused now!
Andy, and Ed from a severed thread, are right. E2K does NOT need to be in native mode to join a 5.5 domain. Our network did it: joined 5.5, moved mailboxes, replicated public folders [but that's a long story], served users from the new server for mail and public folders, got OWA going with mailbox and public folder access, all in the same 5.5 organization in mixed mode (but I didn't say "no sweat"). You go native, forget about your 5.5 server. Delpart it, unless you want to re-install E2K and do the whole thing over again. You CAN have an E2K server in one site/domain connecting to a 5.5 server, and use site links and site connectors (which is actually a smarter way to go; no Free/Busy errors when you [oops] disconnect the 5.5 server a little early.been there, done that). Brian J. Meline, MCSE, 2000MCP Network Support, Exchange Administrator Resolution, Inc. "I didn't know what I was looking for until I found it." Peter Davison _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: I'm confused now!
Sure about that? -Original Message- From: Adam Romain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 12:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I'm confused now! Exchange 2k can only run one there is at least one win2k server running in Native mode in your domain. -Original Message- From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 01 February 2002 17:16 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I'm confused now! My existing MSX 5.5 server is in an NT4 domain called "EXCHANGEX". I'm wanting to install an E2K server in kii.kimball.com (netbios name kii). I want to join the E2K to the MSX 5.5 org and site so that I can move mailboxes. Will this not work? Does my E2K server have to be in the EXCHANGEX domain? Please tell me it doesn't have to be... -Original Message- From: Walt Brannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I'm confused now! Mixed mode includes 5.5 servers too. I guess they mean all the 5.5 servers must be running the same SA. Walt >-Original Message- >From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 10:29 AM >To: Exchange Discussions >Subject: I'm confused now! > >I mean even more confused than normal... > >I've been searching Q articles trying to find a way to fix my >aforementioned problem and ran across Q270143 which describes the >limitations of running >exchange in mixed mode. The following is stated: > >"for example, all servers in the site must use a common service account. " > >Huh? E2K doesn't use a "service account", does it? Am I missing something? > >_ >List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm >Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp >To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. Network Defence Ltd ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: I'm confused now!
Is kii.kimball.com a W2K domain? If so, we just did a similar upgrade. We installed a 5.5 server in the new W2K domain and joined it to the 5.5 site (here's where you need the service account password). Then we installed an E2K server in the W2K domain and moved mailboxes. Of course there are lot more steps and preparations, but that's the basic scheme. Things worked fine. Tom -Original Message- From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 11:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I'm confused now! My existing MSX 5.5 server is in an NT4 domain called "EXCHANGEX". I'm wanting to install an E2K server in kii.kimball.com (netbios name kii). I want to join the E2K to the MSX 5.5 org and site so that I can move mailboxes. Will this not work? Does my E2K server have to be in the EXCHANGEX domain? Please tell me it doesn't have to be... -Original Message- From: Walt Brannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I'm confused now! Mixed mode includes 5.5 servers too. I guess they mean all the 5.5 servers must be running the same SA. Walt >-Original Message- >From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 10:29 AM >To: Exchange Discussions >Subject: I'm confused now! > >I mean even more confused than normal... > >I've been searching Q articles trying to find a way to fix my >aforementioned >problem and ran across Q270143 which describes the limitations of running >exchange in mixed mode. The following is stated: > >"for example, all servers in the site must use a common service account. " > >Huh? E2K doesn't use a "service account", does it? Am I missing something? > >_ >List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm >Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp >To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: I'm confused now!
That's nonsense. Some things work better for migration when you have a native mode Windows 2000 domain, but it's hardly a requirement. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Adam Romain Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 9:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I'm confused now! Exchange 2k can only run one there is at least one win2k server running in Native mode in your domain. -Original Message- From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 01 February 2002 17:16 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I'm confused now! My existing MSX 5.5 server is in an NT4 domain called "EXCHANGEX". I'm wanting to install an E2K server in kii.kimball.com (netbios name kii). I want to join the E2K to the MSX 5.5 org and site so that I can move mailboxes. Will this not work? Does my E2K server have to be in the EXCHANGEX domain? Please tell me it doesn't have to be... -Original Message- From: Walt Brannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I'm confused now! Mixed mode includes 5.5 servers too. I guess they mean all the 5.5 servers must be running the same SA. Walt >-Original Message- >From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 10:29 AM >To: Exchange Discussions >Subject: I'm confused now! > >I mean even more confused than normal... > >I've been searching Q articles trying to find a way to fix my >aforementioned problem and ran across Q270143 which describes the >limitations of running >exchange in mixed mode. The following is stated: > >"for example, all servers in the site must use a common service account. " > >Huh? E2K doesn't use a "service account", does it? Am I missing something? > >_ >List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm >Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp >To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. Network Defence Ltd ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: I'm confused now!
Your Exchange 2000 server CANNOT be in your NT 4.0 domain because it must be in an Active Directory domain. I can tell that this question is just the beginning of a long series of questions. I advise you to pick up a good Exchange 2000 book like Tony Redmond's and start reading, because you have a lot of necessary foundation work. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ken Cornetet Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 9:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I'm confused now! My existing MSX 5.5 server is in an NT4 domain called "EXCHANGEX". I'm wanting to install an E2K server in kii.kimball.com (netbios name kii). I want to join the E2K to the MSX 5.5 org and site so that I can move mailboxes. Will this not work? Does my E2K server have to be in the EXCHANGEX domain? Please tell me it doesn't have to be... -Original Message- From: Walt Brannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I'm confused now! Mixed mode includes 5.5 servers too. I guess they mean all the 5.5 servers must be running the same SA. Walt >-Original Message- >From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 10:29 AM >To: Exchange Discussions >Subject: I'm confused now! > >I mean even more confused than normal... > >I've been searching Q articles trying to find a way to fix my >aforementioned problem and ran across Q270143 which describes the >limitations of running >exchange in mixed mode. The following is stated: > >"for example, all servers in the site must use a common service account. " > >Huh? E2K doesn't use a "service account", does it? Am I missing something? > >_ >List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm >Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp >To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: I'm confused now!
Exchange 2k can only run one there is at least one win2k server running in Native mode in your domain. -Original Message- From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 01 February 2002 17:16 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I'm confused now! My existing MSX 5.5 server is in an NT4 domain called "EXCHANGEX". I'm wanting to install an E2K server in kii.kimball.com (netbios name kii). I want to join the E2K to the MSX 5.5 org and site so that I can move mailboxes. Will this not work? Does my E2K server have to be in the EXCHANGEX domain? Please tell me it doesn't have to be... -Original Message- From: Walt Brannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I'm confused now! Mixed mode includes 5.5 servers too. I guess they mean all the 5.5 servers must be running the same SA. Walt >-Original Message- >From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 10:29 AM >To: Exchange Discussions >Subject: I'm confused now! > >I mean even more confused than normal... > >I've been searching Q articles trying to find a way to fix my >aforementioned problem and ran across Q270143 which describes the >limitations of running >exchange in mixed mode. The following is stated: > >"for example, all servers in the site must use a common service account. " > >Huh? E2K doesn't use a "service account", does it? Am I missing something? > >_ >List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm >Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp >To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. Network Defence Ltd ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: I'm confused now!
My existing MSX 5.5 server is in an NT4 domain called "EXCHANGEX". I'm wanting to install an E2K server in kii.kimball.com (netbios name kii). I want to join the E2K to the MSX 5.5 org and site so that I can move mailboxes. Will this not work? Does my E2K server have to be in the EXCHANGEX domain? Please tell me it doesn't have to be... -Original Message- From: Walt Brannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I'm confused now! Mixed mode includes 5.5 servers too. I guess they mean all the 5.5 servers must be running the same SA. Walt >-Original Message- >From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 10:29 AM >To: Exchange Discussions >Subject: I'm confused now! > >I mean even more confused than normal... > >I've been searching Q articles trying to find a way to fix my >aforementioned >problem and ran across Q270143 which describes the limitations of running >exchange in mixed mode. The following is stated: > >"for example, all servers in the site must use a common service account. " > >Huh? E2K doesn't use a "service account", does it? Am I missing something? > >_ >List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm >Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp >To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: I'm confused now!
Mixed mode includes 5.5 servers too. I guess they mean all the 5.5 servers must be running the same SA. Walt >-Original Message- >From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 10:29 AM >To: Exchange Discussions >Subject: I'm confused now! > >I mean even more confused than normal... > >I've been searching Q articles trying to find a way to fix my >aforementioned >problem and ran across Q270143 which describes the limitations of running >exchange in mixed mode. The following is stated: > >"for example, all servers in the site must use a common service account. " > >Huh? E2K doesn't use a "service account", does it? Am I missing something? > >_ >List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm >Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp >To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
