RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees - the most pra ctical solution
tombolian? Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 4:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees - the most pra ctical solution I disagree entirely. Michael is a typical dumb-ass and ascribing smart-ass stature to his comments demeans smart-asses everywhere. As for his school bully status, again... school bullies everywhere are insulted. I really wonder about the maturity level of some of you people! I don't know what there is to wonder about; I thought the answer would be fairly self-evident. However, maturity and technical prowess have a tombolian intersection in my experience, and thus your quandary is irrelevant. -Original Message- From: Shawn Connelly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 2:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees - the most pra ctical solution Michael's answer is a typical smart-ass response that serves no other purpose than to intentionally humiliate the questioner. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees - the most pra ctical solution
From tombola, a lottery drum. Random chance, rare, bonus when it happens but not likely. -Original Message- From: Chinnery Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 6:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees - the most pra ctical solution tombolian? Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 4:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees - the most pra ctical solution I disagree entirely. Michael is a typical dumb-ass and ascribing smart-ass stature to his comments demeans smart-asses everywhere. As for his school bully status, again... school bullies everywhere are insulted. I really wonder about the maturity level of some of you people! I don't know what there is to wonder about; I thought the answer would be fairly self-evident. However, maturity and technical prowess have a tombolian intersection in my experience, and thus your quandary is irrelevant. -Original Message- From: Shawn Connelly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 2:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees - the most pra ctical solution Michael's answer is a typical smart-ass response that serves no other purpose than to intentionally humiliate the questioner. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees - the most pra ctical solution
Cool word. Jim H -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 2:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees - the most pra ctical solution From tombola, a lottery drum. Random chance, rare, bonus when it happens but not likely. -Original Message- From: Chinnery Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 6:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees - the most pra ctical solution tombolian? Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 4:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees - the most pra ctical solution I disagree entirely. Michael is a typical dumb-ass and ascribing smart-ass stature to his comments demeans smart-asses everywhere. As for his school bully status, again... school bullies everywhere are insulted. I really wonder about the maturity level of some of you people! I don't know what there is to wonder about; I thought the answer would be fairly self-evident. However, maturity and technical prowess have a tombolian intersection in my experience, and thus your quandary is irrelevant. -Original Message- From: Shawn Connelly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 2:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees - the most pra ctical solution Michael's answer is a typical smart-ass response that serves no other purpose than to intentionally humiliate the questioner. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees - the most pra ctical solution
Dumb-ass? ...here I thought you guys were starting to like me:) -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 4:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees - the most pra ctical solution I disagree entirely. Michael is a typical dumb-ass and ascribing smart-ass stature to his comments demeans smart-asses everywhere. As for his school bully status, again... school bullies everywhere are insulted. I really wonder about the maturity level of some of you people! I don't know what there is to wonder about; I thought the answer would be fairly self-evident. However, maturity and technical prowess have a tombolian intersection in my experience, and thus your quandary is irrelevant. -Original Message- From: Shawn Connelly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 2:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees - the most pra ctical solution personalmail Michael's answer is a typical smart-ass response that serves no other purpose than to intentionally humiliate the questioner. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees - the most pra ctical solution
Hey, it's a term of endearment! At 02:25 PM 6/27/2002 -0400, you wrote: Dumb-ass? ...here I thought you guys were starting to like me:) -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 4:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees - the most pra ctical solution I disagree entirely. Michael is a typical dumb-ass and ascribing smart-ass stature to his comments demeans smart-asses everywhere. As for his school bully status, again... school bullies everywhere are insulted. I really wonder about the maturity level of some of you people! I don't know what there is to wonder about; I thought the answer would be fairly self-evident. However, maturity and technical prowess have a tombolian intersection in my experience, and thus your quandary is irrelevant. -Original Message- From: Shawn Connelly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 2:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees - the most pra ctical solution personalmail Michael's answer is a typical smart-ass response that serves no other purpose than to intentionally humiliate the questioner. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees - the most pra ctical solution
With an emphasis on psycho... At 05:22 PM 6/26/2002 -0400, you wrote: Psychometrics, psychometrics, psychometrics!!! -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 5:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees - the most pra ctical solution So you guys don't put bedpans on the heads of cadavers and race them around the office? Geez, what do you do for fun then? -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 4:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees - the most pra ctical solution We're not the National Board of Medical Examiners, but the National Board of Medical Examiners. There's a difference ;) -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 5:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees - the most pra ctical solution Shouldn't you be sending us gross autopsy photos or something? Get to work man! -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 4:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees - the most pra ctical solution You talk purty. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 4:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees - the most pra ctical solution I disagree entirely. Michael is a typical dumb-ass and ascribing smart-ass stature to his comments demeans smart-asses everywhere. As for his school bully status, again... school bullies everywhere are insulted. I really wonder about the maturity level of some of you people! I don't know what there is to wonder about; I thought the answer would be fairly self-evident. However, maturity and technical prowess have a tombolian intersection in my experience, and thus your quandary is irrelevant. -Original Message- From: Shawn Connelly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 2:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees - the most pra ctical solution Michael's answer is a typical smart-ass response that serves no other purpose than to intentionally humiliate the questioner. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_f aq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees - the most pra ctical solution
Michael's answer is a typical smart-ass response that serves no other purpose than to intentionally humiliate the questioner. I don't believe a familiarity of initials necessarily constitutes knowledge of a subject. Would it have been so difficult for you to write, Distribution List?? No, I suppose not, you have to be the school bully! I really wonder about the maturity level of some of you people! Anyhow, I disagree with the suggestions thus far given. The problem with David's suggestion is by adding them back into the DL, your making those former employee email addresses legitimate again. By deleting them from the DL, the server will bounce the mail. However, the admin still receives a copy - I'm assuming that is your problem? Until someone comes up with a KILLFILE type add-on, I found the best solution is to make a inbox (server-based) rule to immediately delete those messages. Howto: From Outlook (2000), - select tools / rules wizard; - click the NEW button and select, check new messages when they arrive; - click NEXT and select with specific words in subject or body; - add in specific words, meaning add in [EMAIL PROTECTED] for each former employee (I'm not too sure how many will fit in here but I have 22 now); - click NEXT and select delete it as your action. That's about it. Very effective and your server still bounces the bad messages. --- Shawn Connelly, Network Engineer. Dipix Technologies Inc. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 2:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees How could you not know what a DL is? I just thought it was kind of weird for an Exch Admin not to know that. -Original Message- From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 2:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees Nice response...thanks...very helpful -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 1:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees Uhhh Whats Exchange Server? -Original Message- From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 1:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees Don't laugh but what's a DL? -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 1:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees create a DL with all the email addresses, no members and hide it. No rule required. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees - the most pra ctical solution
32k limit on rules... suppose one could go to a server side script after that however, if Jane Doe from the warehouse was subscribed to 57 joke of the week mailing lists which neither check for bounces, nor offer unsubscribe information, adding her to a black hole DL eliminates her mail without much in terms of deleterious effects. If I actually don't want to ever see the mail sent to that person and don't believe that bouncing it will have significant impact on the flow, an empty DL sees relatively effective (and more portable). If I were designing my optimal solution though, I'd probably use a 3rd party gateway or upgrade to E2K and write an event sink to 553 the message. -Original Message- From: Shawn Connelly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 2:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees - the most pra ctical solution Michael's answer is a typical smart-ass response that serves no other purpose than to intentionally humiliate the questioner. I don't believe a familiarity of initials necessarily constitutes knowledge of a subject. Would it have been so difficult for you to write, Distribution List?? No, I suppose not, you have to be the school bully! I really wonder about the maturity level of some of you people! Anyhow, I disagree with the suggestions thus far given. The problem with David's suggestion is by adding them back into the DL, your making those former employee email addresses legitimate again. By deleting them from the DL, the server will bounce the mail. However, the admin still receives a copy - I'm assuming that is your problem? Until someone comes up with a KILLFILE type add-on, I found the best solution is to make a inbox (server-based) rule to immediately delete those messages. Howto: From Outlook (2000), - select tools / rules wizard; - click the NEW button and select, check new messages when they arrive; - click NEXT and select with specific words in subject or body; - add in specific words, meaning add in [EMAIL PROTECTED] for each former employee (I'm not too sure how many will fit in here but I have 22 now); - click NEXT and select delete it as your action. That's about it. Very effective and your server still bounces the bad messages. -- -- --- Shawn Connelly, Network Engineer. Dipix Technologies Inc. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 2:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees How could you not know what a DL is? I just thought it was kind of weird for an Exch Admin not to know that. -Original Message- From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 2:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees Nice response...thanks...very helpful -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 1:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees Uhhh Whats Exchange Server? -Original Message- From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 1:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees Don't laugh but what's a DL? -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 1:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees create a DL with all the email addresses, no members and hide it. No rule required. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees - the most pra ctical solution
I disagree entirely. Michael is a typical dumb-ass and ascribing smart-ass stature to his comments demeans smart-asses everywhere. As for his school bully status, again... school bullies everywhere are insulted. I really wonder about the maturity level of some of you people! I don't know what there is to wonder about; I thought the answer would be fairly self-evident. However, maturity and technical prowess have a tombolian intersection in my experience, and thus your quandary is irrelevant. -Original Message- From: Shawn Connelly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 2:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees - the most pra ctical solution Michael's answer is a typical smart-ass response that serves no other purpose than to intentionally humiliate the questioner. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees - the most pra ctical solution
You talk purty. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 4:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees - the most pra ctical solution I disagree entirely. Michael is a typical dumb-ass and ascribing smart-ass stature to his comments demeans smart-asses everywhere. As for his school bully status, again... school bullies everywhere are insulted. I really wonder about the maturity level of some of you people! I don't know what there is to wonder about; I thought the answer would be fairly self-evident. However, maturity and technical prowess have a tombolian intersection in my experience, and thus your quandary is irrelevant. -Original Message- From: Shawn Connelly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 2:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees - the most pra ctical solution Michael's answer is a typical smart-ass response that serves no other purpose than to intentionally humiliate the questioner. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees - the most pra ctical solution
Shouldn't you be sending us gross autopsy photos or something? Get to work man! -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 4:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees - the most pra ctical solution You talk purty. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 4:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees - the most pra ctical solution I disagree entirely. Michael is a typical dumb-ass and ascribing smart-ass stature to his comments demeans smart-asses everywhere. As for his school bully status, again... school bullies everywhere are insulted. I really wonder about the maturity level of some of you people! I don't know what there is to wonder about; I thought the answer would be fairly self-evident. However, maturity and technical prowess have a tombolian intersection in my experience, and thus your quandary is irrelevant. -Original Message- From: Shawn Connelly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 2:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees - the most pra ctical solution Michael's answer is a typical smart-ass response that serves no other purpose than to intentionally humiliate the questioner. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees - the most pra ctical solution
We're not the National Board of Medical Examiners, but the National Board of Medical Examiners. There's a difference ;) -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 5:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees - the most pra ctical solution Shouldn't you be sending us gross autopsy photos or something? Get to work man! -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 4:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees - the most pra ctical solution You talk purty. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 4:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees - the most pra ctical solution I disagree entirely. Michael is a typical dumb-ass and ascribing smart-ass stature to his comments demeans smart-asses everywhere. As for his school bully status, again... school bullies everywhere are insulted. I really wonder about the maturity level of some of you people! I don't know what there is to wonder about; I thought the answer would be fairly self-evident. However, maturity and technical prowess have a tombolian intersection in my experience, and thus your quandary is irrelevant. -Original Message- From: Shawn Connelly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 2:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees - the most pra ctical solution Michael's answer is a typical smart-ass response that serves no other purpose than to intentionally humiliate the questioner. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees - the most pra ctical solution
Ok... so send us some sample exam questions then. *Sheesh* I'd think working for the former would be much more fun. -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 4:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees - the most pra ctical solution We're not the National Board of Medical Examiners, but the National Board of Medical Examiners. There's a difference ;) -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 5:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees - the most pra ctical solution Shouldn't you be sending us gross autopsy photos or something? Get to work man! -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 4:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees - the most pra ctical solution You talk purty. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 4:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees - the most pra ctical solution I disagree entirely. Michael is a typical dumb-ass and ascribing smart-ass stature to his comments demeans smart-asses everywhere. As for his school bully status, again... school bullies everywhere are insulted. I really wonder about the maturity level of some of you people! I don't know what there is to wonder about; I thought the answer would be fairly self-evident. However, maturity and technical prowess have a tombolian intersection in my experience, and thus your quandary is irrelevant. -Original Message- From: Shawn Connelly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 2:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees - the most pra ctical solution Michael's answer is a typical smart-ass response that serves no other purpose than to intentionally humiliate the questioner. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees - the most pra ctical solution
It was moider, I tell ya!!! -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 5:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees - the most pra ctical solution Damnit Quincy, just answer my question. -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 5:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees - the most pra ctical solution We're not the National Board of Medical Examiners, but the National Board of Medical Examiners. There's a difference ;) -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 5:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees - the most pra ctical solution Shouldn't you be sending us gross autopsy photos or something? Get to work man! -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 4:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees - the most pra ctical solution You talk purty. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 4:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees - the most pra ctical solution I disagree entirely. Michael is a typical dumb-ass and ascribing smart-ass stature to his comments demeans smart-asses everywhere. As for his school bully status, again... school bullies everywhere are insulted. I really wonder about the maturity level of some of you people! I don't know what there is to wonder about; I thought the answer would be fairly self-evident. However, maturity and technical prowess have a tombolian intersection in my experience, and thus your quandary is irrelevant. -Original Message- From: Shawn Connelly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 2:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees - the most pra ctical solution Michael's answer is a typical smart-ass response that serves no other purpose than to intentionally humiliate the questioner. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch
RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees - the most pra ctical solution
So you guys don't put bedpans on the heads of cadavers and race them around the office? Geez, what do you do for fun then? -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 4:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees - the most pra ctical solution We're not the National Board of Medical Examiners, but the National Board of Medical Examiners. There's a difference ;) -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 5:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees - the most pra ctical solution Shouldn't you be sending us gross autopsy photos or something? Get to work man! -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 4:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees - the most pra ctical solution You talk purty. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 4:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees - the most pra ctical solution I disagree entirely. Michael is a typical dumb-ass and ascribing smart-ass stature to his comments demeans smart-asses everywhere. As for his school bully status, again... school bullies everywhere are insulted. I really wonder about the maturity level of some of you people! I don't know what there is to wonder about; I thought the answer would be fairly self-evident. However, maturity and technical prowess have a tombolian intersection in my experience, and thus your quandary is irrelevant. -Original Message- From: Shawn Connelly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 2:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees - the most pra ctical solution Michael's answer is a typical smart-ass response that serves no other purpose than to intentionally humiliate the questioner. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees - the most pra ctical solution
Psychometrics, psychometrics, psychometrics!!! -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 5:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees - the most pra ctical solution So you guys don't put bedpans on the heads of cadavers and race them around the office? Geez, what do you do for fun then? -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 4:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees - the most pra ctical solution We're not the National Board of Medical Examiners, but the National Board of Medical Examiners. There's a difference ;) -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 5:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees - the most pra ctical solution Shouldn't you be sending us gross autopsy photos or something? Get to work man! -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 4:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees - the most pra ctical solution You talk purty. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 4:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees - the most pra ctical solution I disagree entirely. Michael is a typical dumb-ass and ascribing smart-ass stature to his comments demeans smart-asses everywhere. As for his school bully status, again... school bullies everywhere are insulted. I really wonder about the maturity level of some of you people! I don't know what there is to wonder about; I thought the answer would be fairly self-evident. However, maturity and technical prowess have a tombolian intersection in my experience, and thus your quandary is irrelevant. -Original Message- From: Shawn Connelly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 2:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees - the most pra ctical solution Michael's answer is a typical smart-ass response that serves no other purpose than to intentionally humiliate the questioner. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_f aq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
