RE: Shutting Down 5.5
Chris, This was used in the old versions of 5.5 (I think before SP3) as Exchange did not shut down in the correct order when requested by NT and therefore took a loo time (E.G. tried to shutdown the services in the wrong order and hence some at the same time, etc; until it got to IS which would shutdown, then it went round in the top and did the same thing again and again until it finally shut everything down). Now we have SP3 it is not necessary. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 October 2002 19:50 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Shutting Down 5.5 I have seen arguments both ways and am interested in the list's perspective. My predecessor here has it drilled into everyone that you have to use his batch script to stop Exchange services in a certain order. I know the info store stopping cleanly is the biggest one you want. Has anyone seen or use something like this to shut down the services in a certain order vs. letting NT take them down in the dependency order upon shutdown? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (04) *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Shutting Down 5.5
Daniel, How come then you could shutdown a server quicker by specifying the shutdown order of the services in a batch file (as requested here) then shutting down SA? if that was the case then the batch file would make no difference. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 October 2002 14:16 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Shutting Down 5.5 That was not the cause of the shutdown; the dependencies make sure of the correct order. It had to do with the IS and how it was flushing buffers which was addressed, finally, in SP3. -Original Message- From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 2:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Shutting Down 5.5 Chris, This was used in the old versions of 5.5 (I think before SP3) as Exchange did not shut down in the correct order when requested by NT and therefore took a loo time (E.G. tried to shutdown the services in the wrong order and hence some at the same time, etc; until it got to IS which would shutdown, then it went round in the top and did the same thing again and again until it finally shut everything down). Now we have SP3 it is not necessary. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 October 2002 19:50 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Shutting Down 5.5 I have seen arguments both ways and am interested in the list's perspective. My predecessor here has it drilled into everyone that you have to use his batch script to stop Exchange services in a certain order. I know the info store stopping cleanly is the biggest one you want. Has anyone seen or use something like this to shut down the services in a certain order vs. letting NT take them down in the dependency order upon shutdown? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (04) *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Shutting Down 5.5
Shut them down in any order you would like. The order in which they are shutdown really only depends on if you are doing a manual shutdown from the command line. Otherwise, stop the DS first, which will take down a couple of others services and then do the rest of manually. It is best to shutdown the services FIRST when you are rebooting the Exchange machine. Takes less time then allowing NT to do it. Geoff... -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 9:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Shutting Down 5.5 That was not the cause of the shutdown; the dependencies make sure of the correct order. It had to do with the IS and how it was flushing buffers which was addressed, finally, in SP3. -Original Message- From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 2:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Shutting Down 5.5 Chris, This was used in the old versions of 5.5 (I think before SP3) as Exchange did not shut down in the correct order when requested by NT and therefore took a loo time (E.G. tried to shutdown the services in the wrong order and hence some at the same time, etc; until it got to IS which would shutdown, then it went round in the top and did the same thing again and again until it finally shut everything down). Now we have SP3 it is not necessary. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 October 2002 19:50 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Shutting Down 5.5 I have seen arguments both ways and am interested in the list's perspective. My predecessor here has it drilled into everyone that you have to use his batch script to stop Exchange services in a certain order. I know the info store stopping cleanly is the biggest one you want. Has anyone seen or use something like this to shut down the services in a certain order vs. letting NT take them down in the dependency order upon shutdown? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (04) *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Shutting Down 5.5
I have seen arguments both ways and am interested in the list's perspective. My predecessor here has it drilled into everyone that you have to use his batch script to stop Exchange services in a certain order. I know the info store stopping cleanly is the biggest one you want. Has anyone seen or use something like this to shut down the services in a certain order vs. letting NT take them down in the dependency order upon shutdown? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Shutting Down 5.5
Same thing to me. Actually, I have used: net stop MSExchangeSA /y net stop MSExchangeSA /y net stop MSExchangeSA /y There. Stopped in order. William Lefkovics, MCSE-NT4, MCSE-W2K, A+, WLKMMAS, ExchangeMVP -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris H Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 11:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Shutting Down 5.5 I have seen arguments both ways and am interested in the list's perspective. My predecessor here has it drilled into everyone that you have to use his batch script to stop Exchange services in a certain order. I know the info store stopping cleanly is the biggest one you want. Has anyone seen or use something like this to shut down the services in a certain order vs. letting NT take them down in the dependency order upon shutdown? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Shutting Down 5.5
Well, when E55 first came out, it used to take FOREVER to shut down when exiting Windows. That has gone away. I don't see anything wrong with manually shutting down the services, but all you have to do is stop the SA service. Everything else will follow automatically. Either way... -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 11:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Shutting Down 5.5 I have seen arguments both ways and am interested in the list's perspective. My predecessor here has it drilled into everyone that you have to use his batch script to stop Exchange services in a certain order. I know the info store stopping cleanly is the biggest one you want. Has anyone seen or use something like this to shut down the services in a certain order vs. letting NT take them down in the dependency order upon shutdown? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Shutting Down 5.5
I always use: Control Panel - Services - highlight System Attendant - right-click and select stop. It doesn't matter which ones you stop first. If you stop the wrong one, all dependent ones will stop first, so you don't make any egregious errors. Be sure to manually stop the spooler service, as well. Sometimes it likes to take advantage of the extended service shutdown times Exchange allows on the server. (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chris H Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 1:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Shutting Down 5.5 I have seen arguments both ways and am interested in the list's perspective. My predecessor here has it drilled into everyone that you have to use his batch script to stop Exchange services in a certain order. I know the info store stopping cleanly is the biggest one you want. Has anyone seen or use something like this to shut down the services in a certain order vs. letting NT take them down in the dependency order upon shutdown? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
