RE: Weird message from System Administrator

2001-10-31 Thread Mike Hoskins

So would this constant bantering be a solution provided or a work-a-round??
At least one thing has been proven...flames will go on.

-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 12:05 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


Sorry, I'm just not a conformist...

I have to deal with the likes of ignorance at my client sites.  I'm
certainly NOT going to accept what they say and leave it at that.  I am a
solution provider and a rather blunt one.  If I don't like what I hear, I
voice my opinion and I back it up.  

So I'm blunt, big deal.  I work to achieve results, positive results.  I
don't work on half a$$ed implementations nor will I advocate them.  If
someone wants me working on their network, then they'd better be prepared
for some bad news if it is not properly configured.  We're in the business
of providing solutions not work-arounds.

The easiest network to administer is the one that is properly configured.
That goes for infrastructure, file servers, email servers, etc...  If it's
not configured properly, it's not worth it.  I get paid an awful lot of
money to do what I do.  If the network and servers are configured properly,
I save the client money because I don't have to waste my time on
work-arounds.

As far as my response to Alex that started this useless whining and banter,
if he'd chosen not to reply so condescendingly, maybe I'd not have called
him an a$$.

-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 2:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


 I have just joined a company with the worst implementation of
 Exchange I have ever seen.  Every admin here is afraid of 
 their boss and will do what he says just to keep him off 
 their backs.  I have, however, refrained from calling all of 
 them a series of politically incorrect names and abusively 
 criticizing the decisions - whether their own or their 
 managements.  It's not that hard to do.  Really.[2]  

But where's the fun in that? Nothing more fun than to go into a staff
meeting with the PHB in attendance and ask Which one of you chuckleheads is
responsible for this piece of $^*)@)?

Or if you'd actually like to change the status quo send out a series of
UNODIR memos about policy and configuration changes you make (along with the
reasons) just after you've implemented them. Then fight to keep them from
being changed back heh.

[2] Try it, Don, you might like it.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Note:  The information contained in this message may be privileged and 
confidential and protected from disclosure.  If the reader of this 
message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent 
responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you 
are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying 
of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you have received 
this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying 
to the message and deleting it from your computer.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Weird message from System Administrator

2001-10-31 Thread Soysal, Serdar


I think if an admin lets his [1] boss make all the technical decisions and
provide no input of his own, then he's not doing his job.  I don't
understand why people should be afraid of their bosses either.  You're
supposed to provide technical expertise to ideas that come from management
or solutions to problems they identify.  That's why they pay you.  If an
admin is nothing more than a mere input device for management, he doesn't
deserve the title admin.

S./

[1] I just assumed this admin to be male to avoid an endless string of
he/she's.  No offense.

-Original Message-
From: Quiram, Nadia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 4:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


Every admin here is afraid of their boss and will do what
he says just to keep him off their backs.  

-Original Message-
From: Edgington, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 1:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


Just for my own edification, what was it?



-Original Message-
From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 7:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


I figured it out myself, Mr. Manners! That shows how much you know, despite
your bigshot attitude!

-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 4:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


Thank you Andy!  His email is about as clear as the Potomac River!

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 1:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


Does this person have an alternate recipient defined for his/her mailbox?



P.S. Your initial explanation of your problem was not very clear at all. 
You stated :

It's being delivered to the .pst file because I don't have room on
the server for more than 600 MB of email! Yes I know all about .pst 
files
being
not the ideal place to store email, but I can't bring down the server
right
now, just to add hard drive!

That to me sounds like your mail server has only 600 MG of available space,
not:

 I didn't say I have 600MB left on our mail server. The user's .pst
file is 600MB.  We have whole bunch of salespeople and others, who 
have each
at least
that much email.(Which you stated later)

Andy



-Original Message-
From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 4:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


I don't have time for this kinda BS.
Except for some useless trash talk, you still couldn't figure it out either!
Here is a tip for you: Mr. BIGSHOT KNOW IT ALL, learn some manners!

-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 3:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


I understand that there is a care bear exchange list you can subscribe to.
Maybe you should try there...

Item #1: Email doesn't necessarily say what you mean
Item #2: Sure she can talk for herself.  However, we've been around here for
quite a few years so we tend to say what we want. Item #3: I saw that, she's
a very nice person and I would expect that of her. Item #4: I have been in
that position before with the exact opposite results you came up with.  I
wonder why... Item #5: Your point is what?!?  My mailbox is 700MB, I've seen
others over a GB.  Big Deal, I've got plenty of disk space and I would never
nor will I ever advocate the use of PST's with an Exchange server. 
Item #6: Apparently not.  Not likely.   Waaahh...
Item #7: Here's $.35, call someone who cares and ask for a refund.

-Original Message-
From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 12:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator



1- I was trying to clarify my situation better for her.
   Contrary to what you thought, I wasn't trying to be condescending to her.

2- Even if I did, can't talk for herself?! Who are you, her lawyer??!
   Still it doesn't give you the right to insult people like that. And you
call
   yourself a computer professional??!

3- She responded to my email without any of the trash talk you did!

4- I am fully aware of our email system is not properly configured, but it's
not
   because I don't know what is the best way to do it, it's because:
   A) No matter how many times I've told them, management doesn't want to
listen to me. 
   B) It doesn't want to spend money.
   C) It's not a high priority
   D) The only time they would approve is when a disaster
  happens. This is typical of this company. You gotta work in my company
  to know what I'm talking about.

5

RE: Weird message from System Administrator

2001-10-31 Thread Andy David

Being an input device for my boss does not sound like my kind of job!




-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 11:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator



I think if an admin lets his [1] boss make all the technical decisions and
provide no input of his own, then he's not doing his job.  I don't
understand why people should be afraid of their bosses either.  You're
supposed to provide technical expertise to ideas that come from management
or solutions to problems they identify.  That's why they pay you.  If an
admin is nothing more than a mere input device for management, he doesn't
deserve the title admin.

S./

[1] I just assumed this admin to be male to avoid an endless string of
he/she's.  No offense.

-Original Message-
From: Quiram, Nadia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 4:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


Every admin here is afraid of their boss and will do what
he says just to keep him off their backs.  

-Original Message-
From: Edgington, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 1:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


Just for my own edification, what was it?



-Original Message-
From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 7:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


I figured it out myself, Mr. Manners! That shows how much you know, despite
your bigshot attitude!

-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 4:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


Thank you Andy!  His email is about as clear as the Potomac River!

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 1:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


Does this person have an alternate recipient defined for his/her mailbox?



P.S. Your initial explanation of your problem was not very clear at all. 
You stated :

It's being delivered to the .pst file because I don't have room on
the server for more than 600 MB of email! Yes I know all about .pst 
files
being
not the ideal place to store email, but I can't bring down the server
right
now, just to add hard drive!

That to me sounds like your mail server has only 600 MG of available space,
not:

 I didn't say I have 600MB left on our mail server. The user's .pst
file is 600MB.  We have whole bunch of salespeople and others, who 
have each
at least
that much email.(Which you stated later)

Andy



-Original Message-
From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 4:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


I don't have time for this kinda BS.
Except for some useless trash talk, you still couldn't figure it out either!
Here is a tip for you: Mr. BIGSHOT KNOW IT ALL, learn some manners!

-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 3:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


I understand that there is a care bear exchange list you can subscribe to.
Maybe you should try there...

Item #1: Email doesn't necessarily say what you mean
Item #2: Sure she can talk for herself.  However, we've been around here for
quite a few years so we tend to say what we want. Item #3: I saw that, she's
a very nice person and I would expect that of her. Item #4: I have been in
that position before with the exact opposite results you came up with.  I
wonder why... Item #5: Your point is what?!?  My mailbox is 700MB, I've seen
others over a GB.  Big Deal, I've got plenty of disk space and I would never
nor will I ever advocate the use of PST's with an Exchange server. 
Item #6: Apparently not.  Not likely.   Waaahh...
Item #7: Here's $.35, call someone who cares and ask for a refund.

-Original Message-
From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 12:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator



1- I was trying to clarify my situation better for her.
   Contrary to what you thought, I wasn't trying to be condescending to her.

2- Even if I did, can't talk for herself?! Who are you, her lawyer??!
   Still it doesn't give you the right to insult people like that. And you
call
   yourself a computer professional??!

3- She responded to my email without any of the trash talk you did!

4- I am fully aware of our email system is not properly configured, but it's
not
   because I don't know what is the best way to do it, it's because:
   A) No matter how many times I've told them, management

RE: Weird message from System Administrator

2001-10-31 Thread blambert

Endless string of he/shes?  Sounds like an orgy

Bill Lambert
Endoxy Healthcare
847-941-9206
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 


-Original Message-
From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 10:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


[1] I just assumed this admin to be male to avoid an endless string of
he/she's.  No offense.

None taken.
=)
Candee


-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 11:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator



I think if an admin lets his [1] boss make all the technical decisions and
provide no input of his own, then he's not doing his job.  I don't
understand why people should be afraid of their bosses either.  You're
supposed to provide technical expertise to ideas that come from management
or solutions to problems they identify.  That's why they pay you.  If an
admin is nothing more than a mere input device for management, he doesn't
deserve the title admin.

S./

[1] I just assumed this admin to be male to avoid an endless string of
he/she's.  No offense.

-Original Message-
From: Quiram, Nadia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 4:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


Every admin here is afraid of their boss and will do what
he says just to keep him off their backs.  

-Original Message-
From: Edgington, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 1:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


Just for my own edification, what was it?



-Original Message-
From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 7:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


I figured it out myself, Mr. Manners! That shows how much you know, despite
your bigshot attitude!

-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 4:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


Thank you Andy!  His email is about as clear as the Potomac River!

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 1:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


Does this person have an alternate recipient defined for his/her mailbox?



P.S. Your initial explanation of your problem was not very clear at all. 
You stated :

It's being delivered to the .pst file because I don't have room on
the server for more than 600 MB of email! Yes I know all about .pst 
files
being
not the ideal place to store email, but I can't bring down the server
right
now, just to add hard drive!

That to me sounds like your mail server has only 600 MG of available space,
not:

 I didn't say I have 600MB left on our mail server. The user's .pst
file is 600MB.  We have whole bunch of salespeople and others, who 
have each
at least
that much email.(Which you stated later)

Andy



-Original Message-
From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 4:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


I don't have time for this kinda BS.
Except for some useless trash talk, you still couldn't figure it out either!
Here is a tip for you: Mr. BIGSHOT KNOW IT ALL, learn some manners!

-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 3:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


I understand that there is a care bear exchange list you can subscribe to.
Maybe you should try there...

Item #1: Email doesn't necessarily say what you mean
Item #2: Sure she can talk for herself.  However, we've been around here for
quite a few years so we tend to say what we want. Item #3: I saw that, she's
a very nice person and I would expect that of her. Item #4: I have been in
that position before with the exact opposite results you came up with.  I
wonder why... Item #5: Your point is what?!?  My mailbox is 700MB, I've seen
others over a GB.  Big Deal, I've got plenty of disk space and I would never
nor will I ever advocate the use of PST's with an Exchange server. 
Item #6: Apparently not.  Not likely.   Waaahh...
Item #7: Here's $.35, call someone who cares and ask for a refund.

-Original Message-
From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 12:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator



1- I was trying to clarify my situation better for her.
   Contrary to what you thought, I wasn't trying to be condescending to her.

2- Even if I did, can't talk for herself?! Who are you, her lawyer??!
   Still it doesn't give you

RE: Weird message from System Administrator

2001-10-31 Thread Joyce, Louis

homer

Mmm..orgies..

homer



Regards

Mr Louis Joyce
Computer Support Analyst
Network Administrator
BT Ignite eSolutions
+44 (0)1392 459155



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 31 October 2001 16:37
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


Endless string of he/shes?  Sounds like an orgy

Bill Lambert
Endoxy Healthcare
847-941-9206
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 


-Original Message-
From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 10:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


[1] I just assumed this admin to be male to avoid an endless string of
he/she's.  No offense.

None taken.
=)
Candee


-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 11:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator



I think if an admin lets his [1] boss make all the technical decisions and
provide no input of his own, then he's not doing his job.  I don't
understand why people should be afraid of their bosses either.  You're
supposed to provide technical expertise to ideas that come from management
or solutions to problems they identify.  That's why they pay you.  If an
admin is nothing more than a mere input device for management, he doesn't
deserve the title admin.

S./

[1] I just assumed this admin to be male to avoid an endless string of
he/she's.  No offense.

-Original Message-
From: Quiram, Nadia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 4:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


Every admin here is afraid of their boss and will do what
he says just to keep him off their backs.  

-Original Message-
From: Edgington, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 1:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


Just for my own edification, what was it?



-Original Message-
From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 7:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


I figured it out myself, Mr. Manners! That shows how much you know, despite
your bigshot attitude!

-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 4:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


Thank you Andy!  His email is about as clear as the Potomac River!

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 1:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


Does this person have an alternate recipient defined for his/her mailbox?



P.S. Your initial explanation of your problem was not very clear at all. 
You stated :

It's being delivered to the .pst file because I don't have room on
the server for more than 600 MB of email! Yes I know all about .pst 
files
being
not the ideal place to store email, but I can't bring down the server
right
now, just to add hard drive!

That to me sounds like your mail server has only 600 MG of available space,
not:

 I didn't say I have 600MB left on our mail server. The user's .pst
file is 600MB.  We have whole bunch of salespeople and others, who 
have each
at least
that much email.(Which you stated later)

Andy



-Original Message-
From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 4:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


I don't have time for this kinda BS.
Except for some useless trash talk, you still couldn't figure it out either!
Here is a tip for you: Mr. BIGSHOT KNOW IT ALL, learn some manners!

-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 3:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


I understand that there is a care bear exchange list you can subscribe to.
Maybe you should try there...

Item #1: Email doesn't necessarily say what you mean
Item #2: Sure she can talk for herself.  However, we've been around here for
quite a few years so we tend to say what we want. Item #3: I saw that, she's
a very nice person and I would expect that of her. Item #4: I have been in
that position before with the exact opposite results you came up with.  I
wonder why... Item #5: Your point is what?!?  My mailbox is 700MB, I've seen
others over a GB.  Big Deal, I've got plenty of disk space and I would never
nor will I ever advocate the use of PST's with an Exchange server. 
Item #6: Apparently not.  Not likely.   Waaahh...
Item #7: Here's $.35, call someone who cares and ask for a refund.

-Original Message-
From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, October

RE: Weird message from System Administrator

2001-10-30 Thread Quiram, Nadia

I don't want to start this rather unpleasant thread again, but I am aghast
at some of what I read.  An admin asks a question: providing app and OS
version and SP, the full error text and a rather plaintive call for help.
This is more than some questions have included that have been posted in the
past (my own included).  

The replies started out helpfully, collecting more information and quickly
denigrated to a most volatile (probably the worst I've seen on this list)
flaming of the admin, who, while still burning tries to further explain his
situation.  I don't know how many on this list didn't understand that he
didn't have room for 600 Meg mailboxes on his server (whether it is a
hardware limit or an IS setting) rather than room for only 600 Megs on his
server. I suspect I am not the only one who did understand him.  There are
doubtless other admins on this list who have to deal with unreasonable,
ignorant management who just happen to have the admins job in their budget.
Not everyone is in a position, or of a personality type, to fight
management.  

Everyone who subscribes to this list for more than 24 hours (and probably
before subscribing because they will have read the FAQ's) is well aware that
everyone, including our unborn children, know that PST's are bad and that
delivery to PST's should be the 11th Commandment.  If you want to have a
stable, secure Exchange org you will impose mailbox limits.  We all [1] know
that users are bigger email packrats than they were paper packrats.  This
necessitates a 'if you must have it, you are on your own - we won't back it
up and we won't restore it' implementation of pst files.  And this is not
just one or two companies, but several.  

We also know that salesmen and other 90% travel employees pitch a b!tch if
it takes more that 5 seconds to open their Inbox even though it is 90 Megs
in size and they have a 36K connection.  When you have to compare the number
of times the Help Desk is called, second level support investigates and
third level support convinces the by-now irate remote user that this is
typical and they need to wait a  v e r y  l o n g  t i m e for the mailbox
to open to the ease of having them pop their mail and be gone  Well,
there is no comparison.  Especially if the user is made aware of the
aforementioned company policy on PST files.  This is typically the type of
person that will never manage their mailbox, so why spend all that time
holding the users hand.  Which is easier:  having them pop mail and not
worry about restoring it?  or suffering through call after call with them
because they won't believe that their ease of remote access is directly
relevant to their management of their mailbox?

I truly believe that Don Ely did not join this world as an all-knowing,
all-seeing Exchange guru.  He must have worked in an environment where he
had to deal with users.  He did say he worked with difficult management in
the past.  It seems to be that we can determine he is of the personality
type to fight management - hopefully more diplomatically than he responded
to Alex's plea for help.  I also hope that the users he did deal with have
gotten counseling and can now face a computer again.

I have just joined a company with the worst implementation of Exchange I
have ever seen.  Every admin here is afraid of their boss and will do what
he says just to keep him off their backs.  I have, however, refrained from
calling all of them a series of politically incorrect names and abusively
criticizing the decisions - whether their own or their managements.  It's
not that hard to do.  Really.[2]  

Sorry for rambling on.
Nadia

[1] Consider yourself excused if you don't want to be included in the royal
'we all' used here and throughout the email
[2] Try it, Don, you might like it.

-Original Message-
From: Edgington, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 1:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


Just for my own edification, what was it?



-Original Message-
From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 7:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


I figured it out myself, Mr. Manners! That shows how much you know, despite
your bigshot attitude!

-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 4:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


Thank you Andy!  His email is about as clear as the Potomac River!

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 1:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


Does this person have an alternate recipient defined for his/her mailbox?



P.S. Your initial explanation of your problem was not very clear at all. 
You stated :

It's being delivered to the .pst file

RE: Weird message from System Administrator

2001-10-30 Thread msharik

  (and probably before subscribing because they will have read the FAQ's)

*sigh*  Oh, how I wish this were true

-Michèle
Immigration site:  http://LadySun1969.tripod.com
Our new 2001 Miata:  http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley
Tiggercam:  http://www.tiggercam.co.uk
-
There are two theories to arguing with women.  Neither one works. 
-


-Original Message-
From: Quiram, Nadia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 4:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


I don't want to start this rather unpleasant thread again, but I am aghast
at some of what I read.  An admin asks a question: providing app and OS
version and SP, the full error text and a rather plaintive call for help.
This is more than some questions have included that have been posted in the
past (my own included).  

The replies started out helpfully, collecting more information and quickly
denigrated to a most volatile (probably the worst I've seen on this list)
flaming of the admin, who, while still burning tries to further explain his
situation.  I don't know how many on this list didn't understand that he
didn't have room for 600 Meg mailboxes on his server (whether it is a
hardware limit or an IS setting) rather than room for only 600 Megs on his
server. I suspect I am not the only one who did understand him.  There are
doubtless other admins on this list who have to deal with unreasonable,
ignorant management who just happen to have the admins job in their budget.
Not everyone is in a position, or of a personality type, to fight
management.  

Everyone who subscribes to this list for more than 24 hours (and probably
before subscribing because they will have read the FAQ's) is well aware that
everyone, including our unborn children, know that PST's are bad and that
delivery to PST's should be the 11th Commandment.  If you want to have a
stable, secure Exchange org you will impose mailbox limits.  We all [1] know
that users are bigger email packrats than they were paper packrats.  This
necessitates a 'if you must have it, you are on your own - we won't back it
up and we won't restore it' implementation of pst files.  And this is not
just one or two companies, but several.  

We also know that salesmen and other 90% travel employees pitch a b!tch if
it takes more that 5 seconds to open their Inbox even though it is 90 Megs
in size and they have a 36K connection.  When you have to compare the number
of times the Help Desk is called, second level support investigates and
third level support convinces the by-now irate remote user that this is
typical and they need to wait a  v e r y  l o n g  t i m e for the mailbox
to open to the ease of having them pop their mail and be gone  Well,
there is no comparison.  Especially if the user is made aware of the
aforementioned company policy on PST files.  This is typically the type of
person that will never manage their mailbox, so why spend all that time
holding the users hand.  Which is easier:  having them pop mail and not
worry about restoring it?  or suffering through call after call with them
because they won't believe that their ease of remote access is directly
relevant to their management of their mailbox?

I truly believe that Don Ely did not join this world as an all-knowing,
all-seeing Exchange guru.  He must have worked in an environment where he
had to deal with users.  He did say he worked with difficult management in
the past.  It seems to be that we can determine he is of the personality
type to fight management - hopefully more diplomatically than he responded
to Alex's plea for help.  I also hope that the users he did deal with have
gotten counseling and can now face a computer again.

I have just joined a company with the worst implementation of Exchange I
have ever seen.  Every admin here is afraid of their boss and will do what
he says just to keep him off their backs.  I have, however, refrained from
calling all of them a series of politically incorrect names and abusively
criticizing the decisions - whether their own or their managements.  It's
not that hard to do.  Really.[2]  

Sorry for rambling on.
Nadia

[1] Consider yourself excused if you don't want to be included in the royal
'we all' used here and throughout the email
[2] Try it, Don, you might like it.

-Original Message-
From: Edgington, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 1:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


Just for my own edification, what was it?



-Original Message-
From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 7:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


I figured it out myself, Mr. Manners! That shows how much you know, despite
your bigshot attitude

RE: Weird message from System Administrator

2001-10-30 Thread Chris Scharff

 I have just joined a company with the worst implementation of 
 Exchange I have ever seen.  Every admin here is afraid of 
 their boss and will do what he says just to keep him off 
 their backs.  I have, however, refrained from calling all of 
 them a series of politically incorrect names and abusively 
 criticizing the decisions - whether their own or their 
 managements.  It's not that hard to do.  Really.[2]  

But where's the fun in that? Nothing more fun than to go into a staff
meeting with the PHB in attendance and ask Which one of you chuckleheads is
responsible for this piece of $^*)@)?

Or if you'd actually like to change the status quo send out a series of
UNODIR memos about policy and configuration changes you make (along with the
reasons) just after you've implemented them. Then fight to keep them from
being changed back heh.

[2] Try it, Don, you might like it. 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Weird message from System Administrator

2001-10-30 Thread Ed Crowley

Sure Mr. Ely flew off the handle.  I think he did so because early responses
from Mr. Aborzfard appeared to be argumentative and condescending.  I
interpreted them the same way.  E-mail is rather one-dimensional; it doesn't
convey smiles, tongues in cheeks, winks, nods or other nonverbal clues.
Further, the question was answered correctly fairly early in the thread by
Mr. Edgington.  Had Mr. Aborzfard just thanked him and moved on, there would
have been a whole lot less degeneration.  But no, he had to fan the flames.

A golden rule of e-mail:  Reread your angry response several times and
reconsider before sending it.

Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer
There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Quiram, Nadia
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 1:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


I don't want to start this rather unpleasant thread again, but I am aghast
at some of what I read.  An admin asks a question: providing app and OS
version and SP, the full error text and a rather plaintive call for help.
This is more than some questions have included that have been posted in the
past (my own included).

The replies started out helpfully, collecting more information and quickly
denigrated to a most volatile (probably the worst I've seen on this list)
flaming of the admin, who, while still burning tries to further explain his
situation.  I don't know how many on this list didn't understand that he
didn't have room for 600 Meg mailboxes on his server (whether it is a
hardware limit or an IS setting) rather than room for only 600 Megs on his
server. I suspect I am not the only one who did understand him.  There are
doubtless other admins on this list who have to deal with unreasonable,
ignorant management who just happen to have the admins job in their budget.
Not everyone is in a position, or of a personality type, to fight
management.

Everyone who subscribes to this list for more than 24 hours (and probably
before subscribing because they will have read the FAQ's) is well aware that
everyone, including our unborn children, know that PST's are bad and that
delivery to PST's should be the 11th Commandment.  If you want to have a
stable, secure Exchange org you will impose mailbox limits.  We all [1] know
that users are bigger email packrats than they were paper packrats.  This
necessitates a 'if you must have it, you are on your own - we won't back it
up and we won't restore it' implementation of pst files.  And this is not
just one or two companies, but several.

We also know that salesmen and other 90% travel employees pitch a b!tch if
it takes more that 5 seconds to open their Inbox even though it is 90 Megs
in size and they have a 36K connection.  When you have to compare the number
of times the Help Desk is called, second level support investigates and
third level support convinces the by-now irate remote user that this is
typical and they need to wait a  v e r y  l o n g  t i m e for the mailbox
to open to the ease of having them pop their mail and be gone  Well,
there is no comparison.  Especially if the user is made aware of the
aforementioned company policy on PST files.  This is typically the type of
person that will never manage their mailbox, so why spend all that time
holding the users hand.  Which is easier:  having them pop mail and not
worry about restoring it?  or suffering through call after call with them
because they won't believe that their ease of remote access is directly
relevant to their management of their mailbox?

I truly believe that Don Ely did not join this world as an all-knowing,
all-seeing Exchange guru.  He must have worked in an environment where he
had to deal with users.  He did say he worked with difficult management in
the past.  It seems to be that we can determine he is of the personality
type to fight management - hopefully more diplomatically than he responded
to Alex's plea for help.  I also hope that the users he did deal with have
gotten counseling and can now face a computer again.

I have just joined a company with the worst implementation of Exchange I
have ever seen.  Every admin here is afraid of their boss and will do what
he says just to keep him off their backs.  I have, however, refrained from
calling all of them a series of politically incorrect names and abusively
criticizing the decisions - whether their own or their managements.  It's
not that hard to do.  Really.[2]

Sorry for rambling on.
Nadia

[1] Consider yourself excused if you don't want to be included in the royal
'we all' used here and throughout the email
[2] Try it, Don, you might like it.

-Original Message-
From: Edgington, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 1:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


Just for my own edification

RE: Weird message from System Administrator

2001-10-30 Thread Don Ely

Sorry, I'm just not a conformist...

I have to deal with the likes of ignorance at my client sites.  I'm
certainly NOT going to accept what they say and leave it at that.  I am a
solution provider and a rather blunt one.  If I don't like what I hear, I
voice my opinion and I back it up.  

So I'm blunt, big deal.  I work to achieve results, positive results.  I
don't work on half a$$ed implementations nor will I advocate them.  If
someone wants me working on their network, then they'd better be prepared
for some bad news if it is not properly configured.  We're in the business
of providing solutions not work-arounds.

The easiest network to administer is the one that is properly configured.
That goes for infrastructure, file servers, email servers, etc...  If it's
not configured properly, it's not worth it.  I get paid an awful lot of
money to do what I do.  If the network and servers are configured properly,
I save the client money because I don't have to waste my time on
work-arounds.

As far as my response to Alex that started this useless whining and banter,
if he'd chosen not to reply so condescendingly, maybe I'd not have called
him an a$$.

-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 2:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


 I have just joined a company with the worst implementation of
 Exchange I have ever seen.  Every admin here is afraid of 
 their boss and will do what he says just to keep him off 
 their backs.  I have, however, refrained from calling all of 
 them a series of politically incorrect names and abusively 
 criticizing the decisions - whether their own or their 
 managements.  It's not that hard to do.  Really.[2]  

But where's the fun in that? Nothing more fun than to go into a staff
meeting with the PHB in attendance and ask Which one of you chuckleheads is
responsible for this piece of $^*)@)?

Or if you'd actually like to change the status quo send out a series of
UNODIR memos about policy and configuration changes you make (along with the
reasons) just after you've implemented them. Then fight to keep them from
being changed back heh.

[2] Try it, Don, you might like it.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Weird message from System Administrator

2001-10-29 Thread Alex Alborzfard

I figured it out myself, Mr. Manners! That shows how much you know,
despite your bigshot attitude!

-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 4:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


Thank you Andy!  His email is about as clear as the Potomac River!

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 1:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


Does this person have an alternate recipient defined for his/her mailbox?



P.S. Your initial explanation of your problem was not very clear at all. 
You stated :

It's being delivered to the .pst file because I don't have room on 
the server for more than 600 MB of email! Yes I know all about .pst 
files
being
not the ideal place to store email, but I can't bring down the server
right
now, just to add hard drive!

That to me sounds like your mail server has only 600 MG of available space,
not:

 I didn't say I have 600MB left on our mail server. The user's .pst 
file is 600MB.  We have whole bunch of salespeople and others, who 
have each
at least
that much email.(Which you stated later)

Andy



-Original Message-
From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 4:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


I don't have time for this kinda BS.
Except for some useless trash talk, you still couldn't figure it out either!
Here is a tip for you: Mr. BIGSHOT KNOW IT ALL, learn some manners!

-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 3:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


I understand that there is a care bear exchange list you can subscribe to.
Maybe you should try there...

Item #1: Email doesn't necessarily say what you mean
Item #2: Sure she can talk for herself.  However, we've been around here for
quite a few years so we tend to say what we want. Item #3: I saw that, she's
a very nice person and I would expect that of her. Item #4: I have been in
that position before with the exact opposite results you came up with.  I
wonder why... Item #5: Your point is what?!?  My mailbox is 700MB, I've seen
others over a GB.  Big Deal, I've got plenty of disk space and I would never
nor will I ever advocate the use of PST's with an Exchange server. 
Item #6: Apparently not.  Not likely.   Waaahh...
Item #7: Here's $.35, call someone who cares and ask for a refund.

-Original Message-
From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 12:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator



1- I was trying to clarify my situation better for her.
   Contrary to what you thought, I wasn't trying to be condescending to her.

2- Even if I did, can't talk for herself?! Who are you, her lawyer??!
   Still it doesn't give you the right to insult people like that. And you
call
   yourself a computer professional??!

3- She responded to my email without any of the trash talk you did!

4- I am fully aware of our email system is not properly configured, but it's
not
   because I don't know what is the best way to do it, it's because:
   A) No matter how many times I've told them, management doesn't want to
listen to me. 
   B) It doesn't want to spend money.
   C) It's not a high priority
   D) The only time they would approve is when a disaster
  happens. This is typical of this company. You gotta work in my company
  to know what I'm talking about.

5- I didn't say I have 600MB left on our mail server. The user's .pst file
is 600MB.
   We have whole bunch of salespeople and others, who have each at least
that much email.

6- I wasn't looking for advice how to set up our email system. I know my
stuff well enough.
   I was just looking for an explanation for this. Instead what I got in
return was insult from you
   and advice on how to set up my mail server and sarcastic remarks from
others, except
   one person, who was actually trying to help me out.
7- So much for my wishful thinking that I can get help here!



-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 2:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


He/she who properly configures his/her doesn't have problems.  Apparently,
you don't follow this model.  

You're the one who started the Again: User is currently out... like Lori
is stupid and can't read.  I merely upgraded to the level deemed necessary
for you.  Call me what you want, think of me what you may...  Fact still
remains, you're housing improperly configured servers and clients.  I more
than get it, you can't dignify anything because you have nothing useful to
dignify.

Configure your sh!t properly and then come

RE: Weird message from System Administrator

2001-10-29 Thread Edgington, Jeff

Just for my own edification, what was it?



-Original Message-
From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 7:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


I figured it out myself, Mr. Manners! That shows how much you know, despite
your bigshot attitude!

-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 4:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


Thank you Andy!  His email is about as clear as the Potomac River!

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 1:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


Does this person have an alternate recipient defined for his/her mailbox?



P.S. Your initial explanation of your problem was not very clear at all. 
You stated :

It's being delivered to the .pst file because I don't have room on
the server for more than 600 MB of email! Yes I know all about .pst 
files
being
not the ideal place to store email, but I can't bring down the server
right
now, just to add hard drive!

That to me sounds like your mail server has only 600 MG of available space,
not:

 I didn't say I have 600MB left on our mail server. The user's .pst
file is 600MB.  We have whole bunch of salespeople and others, who 
have each
at least
that much email.(Which you stated later)

Andy



-Original Message-
From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 4:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


I don't have time for this kinda BS.
Except for some useless trash talk, you still couldn't figure it out either!
Here is a tip for you: Mr. BIGSHOT KNOW IT ALL, learn some manners!

-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 3:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


I understand that there is a care bear exchange list you can subscribe to.
Maybe you should try there...

Item #1: Email doesn't necessarily say what you mean
Item #2: Sure she can talk for herself.  However, we've been around here for
quite a few years so we tend to say what we want. Item #3: I saw that, she's
a very nice person and I would expect that of her. Item #4: I have been in
that position before with the exact opposite results you came up with.  I
wonder why... Item #5: Your point is what?!?  My mailbox is 700MB, I've seen
others over a GB.  Big Deal, I've got plenty of disk space and I would never
nor will I ever advocate the use of PST's with an Exchange server. 
Item #6: Apparently not.  Not likely.   Waaahh...
Item #7: Here's $.35, call someone who cares and ask for a refund.

-Original Message-
From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 12:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator



1- I was trying to clarify my situation better for her.
   Contrary to what you thought, I wasn't trying to be condescending to her.

2- Even if I did, can't talk for herself?! Who are you, her lawyer??!
   Still it doesn't give you the right to insult people like that. And you
call
   yourself a computer professional??!

3- She responded to my email without any of the trash talk you did!

4- I am fully aware of our email system is not properly configured, but it's
not
   because I don't know what is the best way to do it, it's because:
   A) No matter how many times I've told them, management doesn't want to
listen to me. 
   B) It doesn't want to spend money.
   C) It's not a high priority
   D) The only time they would approve is when a disaster
  happens. This is typical of this company. You gotta work in my company
  to know what I'm talking about.

5- I didn't say I have 600MB left on our mail server. The user's .pst file
is 600MB.
   We have whole bunch of salespeople and others, who have each at least
that much email.

6- I wasn't looking for advice how to set up our email system. I know my
stuff well enough.
   I was just looking for an explanation for this. Instead what I got in
return was insult from you
   and advice on how to set up my mail server and sarcastic remarks from
others, except
   one person, who was actually trying to help me out.
7- So much for my wishful thinking that I can get help here!



-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 2:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


He/she who properly configures his/her doesn't have problems.  Apparently,
you don't follow this model.  

You're the one who started the Again: User is currently out... like Lori
is stupid and can't read.  I merely upgraded to the level deemed necessary
for you.  Call me what you want, think

RE: Weird message from System Administrator

2001-10-27 Thread Ed Crowley

Regarding #2, if you want to carry on a personal conversation with someone,
then you don't post it to a discussion list.  Not every participant herein
can watch the list in real time and respond to personal queries.  The nature
of a discussion list is that everyone responds to anything if he or she can
offer something.

Now, as to Mr. Ely's suggestions, you should reconsider your hostility to
his tough love because he's right on the mark.

Ed Crowley
Compaq Computer

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Alex Alborzfard
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 12:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator



1- I was trying to clarify my situation better for her.
   Contrary to what you thought, I wasn't trying to be condescending to her.

2- Even if I did, can't talk for herself?! Who are you, her lawyer??!
   Still it doesn't give you the right to insult people like that. And you
call
   yourself a computer professional??!

3- She responded to my email without any of the trash talk you did!

4- I am fully aware of our email system is not properly configured, but it's
not
   because I don't know what is the best way to do it, it's because:
   A) No matter how many times I've told them, management doesn't want to
listen to me.
   B) It doesn't want to spend money.
   C) It's not a high priority
   D) The only time they would approve is when a disaster
  happens. This is typical of this company. You gotta work in my company
  to know what I'm talking about.

5- I didn't say I have 600MB left on our mail server. The user's .pst file
is 600MB.
   We have whole bunch of salespeople and others, who have each at least
that much email.

6- I wasn't looking for advice how to set up our email system. I know my
stuff well enough.
   I was just looking for an explanation for this. Instead what I got in
return was insult from you
   and advice on how to set up my mail server and sarcastic remarks from
others, except
   one person, who was actually trying to help me out.
7- So much for my wishful thinking that I can get help here!



-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 2:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


He/she who properly configures his/her doesn't have problems.  Apparently,
you don't follow this model.

You're the one who started the Again: User is currently out... like Lori
is stupid and can't read.  I merely upgraded to the level deemed necessary
for you.  Call me what you want, think of me what you may...  Fact still
remains, you're housing improperly configured servers and clients.  I more
than get it, you can't dignify anything because you have nothing useful to
dignify.

Configure your sh!t properly and then come talk some trash.  Til then...
PEACE OUT!

-Original Message-
From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 11:34 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


What kind of language is this??? WTF you think you are??!!!
If you're so thick that you don't get it, don't go insulting people. I'm not
gonna dignify you with an explanation, cause you're too much of a DA to get
it!!!

-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 2:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


Again JackA$$!!  If you have an Exchange server, WTF are you popping mail to
a PST file for?

-Original Message-
From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 11:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


Again: User is currently out of office and not poping email. Therefore all
new emails are going to sit on the server. They'll stay there until she/he
opens up Outlook and pops them. Then they'll be on the .pst file. The point
is email is being delivered, while the sender is receiving a bounced message
to the contrary, back from System Administrator.

It's being delivered to the .pst file because I don't have room on the
server for more than 600 MB of email! Yes I know all about .pst files being
not the ideal place to store email, but I can't bring down the server right
now, just to add hard drive!

I'm looking to find out why is this happening?

-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 2:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


Then why do you say user is receiving the mails if it's supposed to be
delivered to PST and it's sitting on the server?  And why oh why is it
DELIVERED to a PST when you have a server?

Once again, PSTs have their uses but delivery point is not one of them.

-Original Message-
From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday

Weird message from System Administrator

2001-10-26 Thread Alex Alborzfard

EX5.5 SP4 - NT4

Whenever anyone is sending email to user X, they get the following message
back
from System Administrator:

Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients.

  Subject:  Test#2
  Sent: 10/26/2001 1:04 PM

The following recipient(s) could not be reached:

  Joe Blow on 10/26/2001 1:04 PM
The recipient was unavailable to take delivery of the message
The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a=
;p=VISIONICS;l=S-MAIL-011026170419Z-1270
MSEXCH:MSExchangeMTA:JERSEY CITY:S-MAIL

But the weird thing is the user X is actually receiving all the emails.
Any ideas why this is happening?



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Weird message from System Administrator

2001-10-26 Thread Hunter, Lori

Wow, that Joe Blow and User X sure do get around.  I must be the only
Exchange admin who has never worked with them.

What's happening on that client?  Delivery to store or PST?  Limits?  Is he
over?

-Original Message-
From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 12:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Weird message from System Administrator


EX5.5 SP4 - NT4

Whenever anyone is sending email to user X, they get the following message
back
from System Administrator:

Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients.

  Subject:  Test#2
  Sent: 10/26/2001 1:04 PM

The following recipient(s) could not be reached:

  Joe Blow on 10/26/2001 1:04 PM
The recipient was unavailable to take delivery of the message
The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a=
;p=VISIONICS;l=S-MAIL-011026170419Z-1270
MSEXCH:MSExchangeMTA:JERSEY CITY:S-MAIL

But the weird thing is the user X is actually receiving all the emails.
Any ideas why this is happening?



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Weird message from System Administrator

2001-10-26 Thread Alex Alborzfard

User is out of office. Mail is delivered to .pst,
but now is sitting in the mailbox on the server.
There are limits, but the user is not over.

-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 1:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


Wow, that Joe Blow and User X sure do get around.  I must be the only
Exchange admin who has never worked with them.

What's happening on that client?  Delivery to store or PST?  Limits?  Is he
over?

-Original Message-
From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 12:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Weird message from System Administrator


EX5.5 SP4 - NT4

Whenever anyone is sending email to user X, they get the following message
back
from System Administrator:

Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients.

  Subject:  Test#2
  Sent: 10/26/2001 1:04 PM

The following recipient(s) could not be reached:

  Joe Blow on 10/26/2001 1:04 PM
The recipient was unavailable to take delivery of the message
The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a=
;p=VISIONICS;l=S-MAIL-011026170419Z-1270
MSEXCH:MSExchangeMTA:JERSEY CITY:S-MAIL

But the weird thing is the user X is actually receiving all the emails.
Any ideas why this is happening?



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Weird message from System Administrator

2001-10-26 Thread Hunter, Lori

Then why do you say user is receiving the mails if it's supposed to be
delivered to PST and it's sitting on the server?  And why oh why is it
DELIVERED to a PST when you have a server?

Once again, PSTs have their uses but delivery point is not one of them.

-Original Message-
From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 12:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


User is out of office. Mail is delivered to .pst,
but now is sitting in the mailbox on the server.
There are limits, but the user is not over.

-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 1:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


Wow, that Joe Blow and User X sure do get around.  I must be the only
Exchange admin who has never worked with them.

What's happening on that client?  Delivery to store or PST?  Limits?  Is he
over?

-Original Message-
From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 12:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Weird message from System Administrator


EX5.5 SP4 - NT4

Whenever anyone is sending email to user X, they get the following message
back
from System Administrator:

Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients.

  Subject:  Test#2
  Sent: 10/26/2001 1:04 PM

The following recipient(s) could not be reached:

  Joe Blow on 10/26/2001 1:04 PM
The recipient was unavailable to take delivery of the message
The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a=
;p=VISIONICS;l=S-MAIL-011026170419Z-1270
MSEXCH:MSExchangeMTA:JERSEY CITY:S-MAIL

But the weird thing is the user X is actually receiving all the emails.
Any ideas why this is happening?



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Weird message from System Administrator

2001-10-26 Thread Alex Alborzfard

Again: User is currently out of office and not poping email.
Therefore all new emails are going to sit on the server.
They'll stay there until she/he opens up Outlook and pops them.
Then they'll be on the .pst file.
The point is email is being delivered, while the sender is
receiving a bounced message to the contrary, back from System Administrator.

It's being delivered to the .pst file because I don't have room
on the server for more than 600 MB of email! Yes I know all about
.pst files being not the ideal place to store email, but I can't bring down
the server right now, just to add hard drive!

I'm looking to find out why is this happening?

-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 2:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


Then why do you say user is receiving the mails if it's supposed to be
delivered to PST and it's sitting on the server?  And why oh why is it
DELIVERED to a PST when you have a server?

Once again, PSTs have their uses but delivery point is not one of them.

-Original Message-
From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 12:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


User is out of office. Mail is delivered to .pst,
but now is sitting in the mailbox on the server.
There are limits, but the user is not over.

-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 1:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


Wow, that Joe Blow and User X sure do get around.  I must be the only
Exchange admin who has never worked with them.

What's happening on that client?  Delivery to store or PST?  Limits?  Is he
over?

-Original Message-
From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 12:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Weird message from System Administrator


EX5.5 SP4 - NT4

Whenever anyone is sending email to user X, they get the following message
back
from System Administrator:

Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients.

  Subject:  Test#2
  Sent: 10/26/2001 1:04 PM

The following recipient(s) could not be reached:

  Joe Blow on 10/26/2001 1:04 PM
The recipient was unavailable to take delivery of the message
The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a=
;p=VISIONICS;l=S-MAIL-011026170419Z-1270
MSEXCH:MSExchangeMTA:JERSEY CITY:S-MAIL

But the weird thing is the user X is actually receiving all the emails.
Any ideas why this is happening?



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Weird message from System Administrator

2001-10-26 Thread Don Ely

Again JackA$$!!  If you have an Exchange server, WTF are you popping mail to
a PST file for?

-Original Message-
From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 11:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


Again: User is currently out of office and not poping email. Therefore all
new emails are going to sit on the server. They'll stay there until she/he
opens up Outlook and pops them. Then they'll be on the .pst file. The point
is email is being delivered, while the sender is receiving a bounced message
to the contrary, back from System Administrator.

It's being delivered to the .pst file because I don't have room on the
server for more than 600 MB of email! Yes I know all about .pst files being
not the ideal place to store email, but I can't bring down the server right
now, just to add hard drive!

I'm looking to find out why is this happening?

-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 2:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


Then why do you say user is receiving the mails if it's supposed to be
delivered to PST and it's sitting on the server?  And why oh why is it
DELIVERED to a PST when you have a server?

Once again, PSTs have their uses but delivery point is not one of them.

-Original Message-
From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 12:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


User is out of office. Mail is delivered to .pst,
but now is sitting in the mailbox on the server.
There are limits, but the user is not over.

-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 1:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


Wow, that Joe Blow and User X sure do get around.  I must be the only
Exchange admin who has never worked with them.

What's happening on that client?  Delivery to store or PST?  Limits?  Is he
over?

-Original Message-
From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 12:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Weird message from System Administrator


EX5.5 SP4 - NT4

Whenever anyone is sending email to user X, they get the following message
back from System Administrator:

Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients.

  Subject:  Test#2
  Sent: 10/26/2001 1:04 PM

The following recipient(s) could not be reached:

  Joe Blow on 10/26/2001 1:04 PM
The recipient was unavailable to take delivery of the message
The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a=
;p=VISIONICS;l=S-MAIL-011026170419Z-1270
MSEXCH:MSExchangeMTA:JERSEY CITY:S-MAIL

But the weird thing is the user X is actually receiving all the emails. Any
ideas why this is happening?



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Weird message from System Administrator

2001-10-26 Thread Alex Alborzfard

What kind of language is this??? WTF you think you are??!!!
If you're so thick that you don't get it, don't go insulting
people. I'm not gonna dignify you with an explanation, cause
you're too much of a DA to get it!!!

-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 2:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


Again JackA$$!!  If you have an Exchange server, WTF are you popping mail to
a PST file for?

-Original Message-
From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 11:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


Again: User is currently out of office and not poping email. Therefore all
new emails are going to sit on the server. They'll stay there until she/he
opens up Outlook and pops them. Then they'll be on the .pst file. The point
is email is being delivered, while the sender is receiving a bounced message
to the contrary, back from System Administrator.

It's being delivered to the .pst file because I don't have room on the
server for more than 600 MB of email! Yes I know all about .pst files being
not the ideal place to store email, but I can't bring down the server right
now, just to add hard drive!

I'm looking to find out why is this happening?

-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 2:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


Then why do you say user is receiving the mails if it's supposed to be
delivered to PST and it's sitting on the server?  And why oh why is it
DELIVERED to a PST when you have a server?

Once again, PSTs have their uses but delivery point is not one of them.

-Original Message-
From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 12:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


User is out of office. Mail is delivered to .pst,
but now is sitting in the mailbox on the server.
There are limits, but the user is not over.

-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 1:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


Wow, that Joe Blow and User X sure do get around.  I must be the only
Exchange admin who has never worked with them.

What's happening on that client?  Delivery to store or PST?  Limits?  Is he
over?

-Original Message-
From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 12:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Weird message from System Administrator


EX5.5 SP4 - NT4

Whenever anyone is sending email to user X, they get the following message
back from System Administrator:

Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients.

  Subject:  Test#2
  Sent: 10/26/2001 1:04 PM

The following recipient(s) could not be reached:

  Joe Blow on 10/26/2001 1:04 PM
The recipient was unavailable to take delivery of the message
The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a=
;p=VISIONICS;l=S-MAIL-011026170419Z-1270
MSEXCH:MSExchangeMTA:JERSEY CITY:S-MAIL

But the weird thing is the user X is actually receiving all the emails. Any
ideas why this is happening?



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm

RE: Weird message from System Administrator

2001-10-26 Thread Hunter, Lori

If you only have room on your server for 600 megs of mail, you have far
bigger problems than this one pop user.

And I never said anything about PST being a bad place to STORE mail.  I have
several myself, strategically located so as to minimize my grief if I lost
any one of them.

PST as delivery point is a whole mess of problems waiting to happen.  You
just may have stumbled across one today.

-Original Message-
From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 1:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


Again: User is currently out of office and not poping email.
Therefore all new emails are going to sit on the server.
They'll stay there until she/he opens up Outlook and pops them.
Then they'll be on the .pst file.
The point is email is being delivered, while the sender is
receiving a bounced message to the contrary, back from System Administrator.

It's being delivered to the .pst file because I don't have room
on the server for more than 600 MB of email! Yes I know all about
.pst files being not the ideal place to store email, but I can't bring down
the server right now, just to add hard drive!

I'm looking to find out why is this happening?

-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 2:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


Then why do you say user is receiving the mails if it's supposed to be
delivered to PST and it's sitting on the server?  And why oh why is it
DELIVERED to a PST when you have a server?

Once again, PSTs have their uses but delivery point is not one of them.

-Original Message-
From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 12:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


User is out of office. Mail is delivered to .pst,
but now is sitting in the mailbox on the server.
There are limits, but the user is not over.

-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 1:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


Wow, that Joe Blow and User X sure do get around.  I must be the only
Exchange admin who has never worked with them.

What's happening on that client?  Delivery to store or PST?  Limits?  Is he
over?

-Original Message-
From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 12:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Weird message from System Administrator


EX5.5 SP4 - NT4

Whenever anyone is sending email to user X, they get the following message
back
from System Administrator:

Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients.

  Subject:  Test#2
  Sent: 10/26/2001 1:04 PM

The following recipient(s) could not be reached:

  Joe Blow on 10/26/2001 1:04 PM
The recipient was unavailable to take delivery of the message
The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a=
;p=VISIONICS;l=S-MAIL-011026170419Z-1270
MSEXCH:MSExchangeMTA:JERSEY CITY:S-MAIL

But the weird thing is the user X is actually receiving all the emails.
Any ideas why this is happening?



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL

RE: Weird message from System Administrator

2001-10-26 Thread Don Ely

He/she who properly configures his/her doesn't have problems.  Apparently,
you don't follow this model.  

You're the one who started the Again: User is currently out... like Lori
is stupid and can't read.  I merely upgraded to the level deemed necessary
for you.  Call me what you want, think of me what you may...  Fact still
remains, you're housing improperly configured servers and clients.  I more
than get it, you can't dignify anything because you have nothing useful to
dignify.

Configure your sh!t properly and then come talk some trash.  Til then...
PEACE OUT!

-Original Message-
From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 11:34 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


What kind of language is this??? WTF you think you are??!!!
If you're so thick that you don't get it, don't go insulting people. I'm not
gonna dignify you with an explanation, cause you're too much of a DA to get
it!!!

-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 2:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


Again JackA$$!!  If you have an Exchange server, WTF are you popping mail to
a PST file for?

-Original Message-
From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 11:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


Again: User is currently out of office and not poping email. Therefore all
new emails are going to sit on the server. They'll stay there until she/he
opens up Outlook and pops them. Then they'll be on the .pst file. The point
is email is being delivered, while the sender is receiving a bounced message
to the contrary, back from System Administrator.

It's being delivered to the .pst file because I don't have room on the
server for more than 600 MB of email! Yes I know all about .pst files being
not the ideal place to store email, but I can't bring down the server right
now, just to add hard drive!

I'm looking to find out why is this happening?

-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 2:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


Then why do you say user is receiving the mails if it's supposed to be
delivered to PST and it's sitting on the server?  And why oh why is it
DELIVERED to a PST when you have a server?

Once again, PSTs have their uses but delivery point is not one of them.

-Original Message-
From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 12:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


User is out of office. Mail is delivered to .pst,
but now is sitting in the mailbox on the server.
There are limits, but the user is not over.

-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 1:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


Wow, that Joe Blow and User X sure do get around.  I must be the only
Exchange admin who has never worked with them.

What's happening on that client?  Delivery to store or PST?  Limits?  Is he
over?

-Original Message-
From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 12:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Weird message from System Administrator


EX5.5 SP4 - NT4

Whenever anyone is sending email to user X, they get the following message
back from System Administrator:

Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients.

  Subject:  Test#2
  Sent: 10/26/2001 1:04 PM

The following recipient(s) could not be reached:

  Joe Blow on 10/26/2001 1:04 PM
The recipient was unavailable to take delivery of the message
The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a=
;p=VISIONICS;l=S-MAIL-011026170419Z-1270
MSEXCH:MSExchangeMTA:JERSEY CITY:S-MAIL

But the weird thing is the user X is actually receiving all the emails. Any
ideas why this is happening?



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL

RE: Weird message from System Administrator

2001-10-26 Thread Edgington, Jeff

I am only a novice at this stuff right now, but 'The recipient was
unavailable to take delivery of the message' is -usually- indicative of a
mailbox being over the limit... I know you alluded that you checked the
limits, but I wonder if the following scenario is occurring...

1.  User X leaves on a trip
2.  User X's mailbox fills
3.  Joe Blow sends an e-mail and gets 'The recipient was unavailable to take
delivery of the message'
4.  User X returns and pops the mail off... now the mailbox is back under
it's limit.

??? maybe???

600 megs... man that's small.



-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 1:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


If you only have room on your server for 600 megs of mail, you have far
bigger problems than this one pop user.

And I never said anything about PST being a bad place to STORE mail.  I have
several myself, strategically located so as to minimize my grief if I lost
any one of them.

PST as delivery point is a whole mess of problems waiting to happen.  You
just may have stumbled across one today.

-Original Message-
From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 1:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


Again: User is currently out of office and not poping email. Therefore all
new emails are going to sit on the server. They'll stay there until she/he
opens up Outlook and pops them. Then they'll be on the .pst file. The point
is email is being delivered, while the sender is receiving a bounced message
to the contrary, back from System Administrator.

It's being delivered to the .pst file because I don't have room on the
server for more than 600 MB of email! Yes I know all about .pst files being
not the ideal place to store email, but I can't bring down the server right
now, just to add hard drive!

I'm looking to find out why is this happening?

-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 2:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


Then why do you say user is receiving the mails if it's supposed to be
delivered to PST and it's sitting on the server?  And why oh why is it
DELIVERED to a PST when you have a server?

Once again, PSTs have their uses but delivery point is not one of them.

-Original Message-
From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 12:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


User is out of office. Mail is delivered to .pst,
but now is sitting in the mailbox on the server.
There are limits, but the user is not over.

-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 1:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


Wow, that Joe Blow and User X sure do get around.  I must be the only
Exchange admin who has never worked with them.

What's happening on that client?  Delivery to store or PST?  Limits?  Is he
over?

-Original Message-
From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 12:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Weird message from System Administrator


EX5.5 SP4 - NT4

Whenever anyone is sending email to user X, they get the following message
back from System Administrator:

Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients.

  Subject:  Test#2
  Sent: 10/26/2001 1:04 PM

The following recipient(s) could not be reached:

  Joe Blow on 10/26/2001 1:04 PM
The recipient was unavailable to take delivery of the message
The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a=
;p=VISIONICS;l=S-MAIL-011026170419Z-1270
MSEXCH:MSExchangeMTA:JERSEY CITY:S-MAIL

But the weird thing is the user X is actually receiving all the emails. Any
ideas why this is happening?



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: Weird message from System Administrator

2001-10-26 Thread Paul Done

relax
Why did you call him a DA - is he a district attorney?
/relax

-Original Message-
From: Edgington, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 11:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


I am only a novice at this stuff right now, but 'The recipient was
unavailable to take delivery of the message' is -usually- indicative of a
mailbox being over the limit... I know you alluded that you checked the
limits, but I wonder if the following scenario is occurring...

1.  User X leaves on a trip
2.  User X's mailbox fills
3.  Joe Blow sends an e-mail and gets 'The recipient was unavailable to take
delivery of the message'
4.  User X returns and pops the mail off... now the mailbox is back under
it's limit.

??? maybe???

600 megs... man that's small.



-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 1:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


If you only have room on your server for 600 megs of mail, you have far
bigger problems than this one pop user.

And I never said anything about PST being a bad place to STORE mail.  I have
several myself, strategically located so as to minimize my grief if I lost
any one of them.

PST as delivery point is a whole mess of problems waiting to happen.  You
just may have stumbled across one today.

-Original Message-
From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 1:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


Again: User is currently out of office and not poping email. Therefore all
new emails are going to sit on the server. They'll stay there until she/he
opens up Outlook and pops them. Then they'll be on the .pst file. The point
is email is being delivered, while the sender is receiving a bounced message
to the contrary, back from System Administrator.

It's being delivered to the .pst file because I don't have room on the
server for more than 600 MB of email! Yes I know all about .pst files being
not the ideal place to store email, but I can't bring down the server right
now, just to add hard drive!

I'm looking to find out why is this happening?

-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 2:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


Then why do you say user is receiving the mails if it's supposed to be
delivered to PST and it's sitting on the server?  And why oh why is it
DELIVERED to a PST when you have a server?

Once again, PSTs have their uses but delivery point is not one of them.

-Original Message-
From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 12:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


User is out of office. Mail is delivered to .pst,
but now is sitting in the mailbox on the server.
There are limits, but the user is not over.

-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 1:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


Wow, that Joe Blow and User X sure do get around.  I must be the only
Exchange admin who has never worked with them.

What's happening on that client?  Delivery to store or PST?  Limits?  Is he
over?

-Original Message-
From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 12:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Weird message from System Administrator


EX5.5 SP4 - NT4

Whenever anyone is sending email to user X, they get the following message
back from System Administrator:

Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients.

  Subject:  Test#2
  Sent: 10/26/2001 1:04 PM

The following recipient(s) could not be reached:

  Joe Blow on 10/26/2001 1:04 PM
The recipient was unavailable to take delivery of the message
The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a=
;p=VISIONICS;l=S-MAIL-011026170419Z-1270
MSEXCH:MSExchangeMTA:JERSEY CITY:S-MAIL

But the weird thing is the user X is actually receiving all the emails. Any
ideas why this is happening?



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ

RE: Weird message from System Administrator

2001-10-26 Thread msharik

Maybe he meant Duck's A$$?  as in the hairstyle from the 50s?

-Michèle
Immigration site:  http://LadySun1969.tripod.com
Our new 2001 Miata:  http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley
Tiggercam:  http://www.tiggercam.co.uk
-
I've got a monkey on my foot! -Arthur Carlson 
-


-Original Message-
From: Paul Done [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 3:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


relax
Why did you call him a DA - is he a district attorney?
/relax

-Original Message-
From: Edgington, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 11:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


I am only a novice at this stuff right now, but 'The recipient was
unavailable to take delivery of the message' is -usually- indicative of a
mailbox being over the limit... I know you alluded that you checked the
limits, but I wonder if the following scenario is occurring...

1.  User X leaves on a trip
2.  User X's mailbox fills
3.  Joe Blow sends an e-mail and gets 'The recipient was unavailable to take
delivery of the message'
4.  User X returns and pops the mail off... now the mailbox is back under
it's limit.

??? maybe???

600 megs... man that's small.



-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 1:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


If you only have room on your server for 600 megs of mail, you have far
bigger problems than this one pop user.

And I never said anything about PST being a bad place to STORE mail.  I have
several myself, strategically located so as to minimize my grief if I lost
any one of them.

PST as delivery point is a whole mess of problems waiting to happen.  You
just may have stumbled across one today.

-Original Message-
From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 1:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


Again: User is currently out of office and not poping email. Therefore all
new emails are going to sit on the server. They'll stay there until she/he
opens up Outlook and pops them. Then they'll be on the .pst file. The point
is email is being delivered, while the sender is receiving a bounced message
to the contrary, back from System Administrator.

It's being delivered to the .pst file because I don't have room on the
server for more than 600 MB of email! Yes I know all about .pst files being
not the ideal place to store email, but I can't bring down the server right
now, just to add hard drive!

I'm looking to find out why is this happening?

-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 2:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


Then why do you say user is receiving the mails if it's supposed to be
delivered to PST and it's sitting on the server?  And why oh why is it
DELIVERED to a PST when you have a server?

Once again, PSTs have their uses but delivery point is not one of them.

-Original Message-
From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 12:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


User is out of office. Mail is delivered to .pst,
but now is sitting in the mailbox on the server.
There are limits, but the user is not over.

-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 1:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


Wow, that Joe Blow and User X sure do get around.  I must be the only
Exchange admin who has never worked with them.

What's happening on that client?  Delivery to store or PST?  Limits?  Is he
over?

-Original Message-
From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 12:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Weird message from System Administrator


EX5.5 SP4 - NT4

Whenever anyone is sending email to user X, they get the following message
back from System Administrator:

Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients.

  Subject:  Test#2
  Sent: 10/26/2001 1:04 PM

The following recipient(s) could not be reached:

  Joe Blow on 10/26/2001 1:04 PM
The recipient was unavailable to take delivery of the message
The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a=
;p=VISIONICS;l=S-MAIL-011026170419Z-1270
MSEXCH:MSExchangeMTA:JERSEY CITY:S-MAIL

But the weird thing is the user X is actually receiving all the emails. Any
ideas why this is happening?



_
List posting FAQ:   http

RE: Weird message from System Administrator

2001-10-26 Thread Andy David

User is currently out of office and not poping email
Which is *much* better than pooping mail...

I can only assume then that you have your Deleted Item Retention set to 0
and circular logging is enabled.
That and only room for 600 MB of email? You do live on the edge!



-Original Message-
From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 2:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


Again: User is currently out of office and not poping email.
Therefore all new emails are going to sit on the server.
They'll stay there until she/he opens up Outlook and pops them.
Then they'll be on the .pst file.
The point is email is being delivered, while the sender is
receiving a bounced message to the contrary, back from System Administrator.

It's being delivered to the .pst file because I don't have room
on the server for more than 600 MB of email! Yes I know all about
.pst files being not the ideal place to store email, but I can't bring down
the server right now, just to add hard drive!

I'm looking to find out why is this happening?

-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 2:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


Then why do you say user is receiving the mails if it's supposed to be
delivered to PST and it's sitting on the server?  And why oh why is it
DELIVERED to a PST when you have a server?

Once again, PSTs have their uses but delivery point is not one of them.

-Original Message-
From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 12:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


User is out of office. Mail is delivered to .pst,
but now is sitting in the mailbox on the server.
There are limits, but the user is not over.

-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 1:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


Wow, that Joe Blow and User X sure do get around.  I must be the only
Exchange admin who has never worked with them.

What's happening on that client?  Delivery to store or PST?  Limits?  Is he
over?

-Original Message-
From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 12:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Weird message from System Administrator


EX5.5 SP4 - NT4

Whenever anyone is sending email to user X, they get the following message
back
from System Administrator:

Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients.

  Subject:  Test#2
  Sent: 10/26/2001 1:04 PM

The following recipient(s) could not be reached:

  Joe Blow on 10/26/2001 1:04 PM
The recipient was unavailable to take delivery of the message
The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a=
;p=VISIONICS;l=S-MAIL-011026170419Z-1270
MSEXCH:MSExchangeMTA:JERSEY CITY:S-MAIL

But the weird thing is the user X is actually receiving all the emails.
Any ideas why this is happening?



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Weird message from System Administrator

2001-10-26 Thread Andy David

Naw, those are just my initials backwards...



-Original Message-
From: Paul Done [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 3:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


relax
Why did you call him a DA - is he a district attorney?
/relax

-Original Message-
From: Edgington, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 11:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


I am only a novice at this stuff right now, but 'The recipient was
unavailable to take delivery of the message' is -usually- indicative of a
mailbox being over the limit... I know you alluded that you checked the
limits, but I wonder if the following scenario is occurring...

1.  User X leaves on a trip
2.  User X's mailbox fills
3.  Joe Blow sends an e-mail and gets 'The recipient was unavailable to take
delivery of the message'
4.  User X returns and pops the mail off... now the mailbox is back under
it's limit.

??? maybe???

600 megs... man that's small.



-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 1:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


If you only have room on your server for 600 megs of mail, you have far
bigger problems than this one pop user.

And I never said anything about PST being a bad place to STORE mail.  I have
several myself, strategically located so as to minimize my grief if I lost
any one of them.

PST as delivery point is a whole mess of problems waiting to happen.  You
just may have stumbled across one today.

-Original Message-
From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 1:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


Again: User is currently out of office and not poping email. Therefore all
new emails are going to sit on the server. They'll stay there until she/he
opens up Outlook and pops them. Then they'll be on the .pst file. The point
is email is being delivered, while the sender is receiving a bounced message
to the contrary, back from System Administrator.

It's being delivered to the .pst file because I don't have room on the
server for more than 600 MB of email! Yes I know all about .pst files being
not the ideal place to store email, but I can't bring down the server right
now, just to add hard drive!

I'm looking to find out why is this happening?

-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 2:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


Then why do you say user is receiving the mails if it's supposed to be
delivered to PST and it's sitting on the server?  And why oh why is it
DELIVERED to a PST when you have a server?

Once again, PSTs have their uses but delivery point is not one of them.

-Original Message-
From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 12:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


User is out of office. Mail is delivered to .pst,
but now is sitting in the mailbox on the server.
There are limits, but the user is not over.

-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 1:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


Wow, that Joe Blow and User X sure do get around.  I must be the only
Exchange admin who has never worked with them.

What's happening on that client?  Delivery to store or PST?  Limits?  Is he
over?

-Original Message-
From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 12:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Weird message from System Administrator


EX5.5 SP4 - NT4

Whenever anyone is sending email to user X, they get the following message
back from System Administrator:

Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients.

  Subject:  Test#2
  Sent: 10/26/2001 1:04 PM

The following recipient(s) could not be reached:

  Joe Blow on 10/26/2001 1:04 PM
The recipient was unavailable to take delivery of the message
The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a=
;p=VISIONICS;l=S-MAIL-011026170419Z-1270
MSEXCH:MSExchangeMTA:JERSEY CITY:S-MAIL

But the weird thing is the user X is actually receiving all the emails. Any
ideas why this is happening?



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives

RE: Weird message from System Administrator

2001-10-26 Thread Alex Alborzfard


1- I was trying to clarify my situation better for her.
   Contrary to what you thought, I wasn't trying to be condescending to her.

2- Even if I did, can't talk for herself?! Who are you, her lawyer??!
   Still it doesn't give you the right to insult people like that. And you
call
   yourself a computer professional??!

3- She responded to my email without any of the trash talk you did!

4- I am fully aware of our email system is not properly configured, but it's
not
   because I don't know what is the best way to do it, it's because:
   A) No matter how many times I've told them, management doesn't want to
listen to me. 
   B) It doesn't want to spend money.
   C) It's not a high priority
   D) The only time they would approve is when a disaster
  happens. This is typical of this company. You gotta work in my company
  to know what I'm talking about.

5- I didn't say I have 600MB left on our mail server. The user's .pst file
is 600MB.
   We have whole bunch of salespeople and others, who have each at least
that much email.

6- I wasn't looking for advice how to set up our email system. I know my
stuff well enough.
   I was just looking for an explanation for this. Instead what I got in
return was insult from you
   and advice on how to set up my mail server and sarcastic remarks from
others, except
   one person, who was actually trying to help me out.
7- So much for my wishful thinking that I can get help here!



-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 2:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


He/she who properly configures his/her doesn't have problems.  Apparently,
you don't follow this model.  

You're the one who started the Again: User is currently out... like Lori
is stupid and can't read.  I merely upgraded to the level deemed necessary
for you.  Call me what you want, think of me what you may...  Fact still
remains, you're housing improperly configured servers and clients.  I more
than get it, you can't dignify anything because you have nothing useful to
dignify.

Configure your sh!t properly and then come talk some trash.  Til then...
PEACE OUT!

-Original Message-
From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 11:34 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


What kind of language is this??? WTF you think you are??!!!
If you're so thick that you don't get it, don't go insulting people. I'm not
gonna dignify you with an explanation, cause you're too much of a DA to get
it!!!

-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 2:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


Again JackA$$!!  If you have an Exchange server, WTF are you popping mail to
a PST file for?

-Original Message-
From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 11:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


Again: User is currently out of office and not poping email. Therefore all
new emails are going to sit on the server. They'll stay there until she/he
opens up Outlook and pops them. Then they'll be on the .pst file. The point
is email is being delivered, while the sender is receiving a bounced message
to the contrary, back from System Administrator.

It's being delivered to the .pst file because I don't have room on the
server for more than 600 MB of email! Yes I know all about .pst files being
not the ideal place to store email, but I can't bring down the server right
now, just to add hard drive!

I'm looking to find out why is this happening?

-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 2:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


Then why do you say user is receiving the mails if it's supposed to be
delivered to PST and it's sitting on the server?  And why oh why is it
DELIVERED to a PST when you have a server?

Once again, PSTs have their uses but delivery point is not one of them.

-Original Message-
From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 12:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


User is out of office. Mail is delivered to .pst,
but now is sitting in the mailbox on the server.
There are limits, but the user is not over.

-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 1:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


Wow, that Joe Blow and User X sure do get around.  I must be the only
Exchange admin who has never worked with them.

What's happening on that client?  Delivery to store or PST?  Limits?  Is he
over?

-Original Message-
From: Alex Alborzfard

RE: Weird message from System Administrator

2001-10-26 Thread Don Ely

I understand that there is a care bear exchange list you can subscribe to.
Maybe you should try there...

Item #1: Email doesn't necessarily say what you mean
Item #2: Sure she can talk for herself.  However, we've been around here for
quite a few years so we tend to say what we want.
Item #3: I saw that, she's a very nice person and I would expect that of
her.
Item #4: I have been in that position before with the exact opposite results
you came up with.  I wonder why...
Item #5: Your point is what?!?  My mailbox is 700MB, I've seen others over a
GB.  Big Deal, I've got plenty of disk space and I would never nor will I
ever advocate the use of PST's with an Exchange server. 
Item #6: Apparently not.  Not likely.   Waaahh...
Item #7: Here's $.35, call someone who cares and ask for a refund.

-Original Message-
From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 12:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator



1- I was trying to clarify my situation better for her.
   Contrary to what you thought, I wasn't trying to be condescending to her.

2- Even if I did, can't talk for herself?! Who are you, her lawyer??!
   Still it doesn't give you the right to insult people like that. And you
call
   yourself a computer professional??!

3- She responded to my email without any of the trash talk you did!

4- I am fully aware of our email system is not properly configured, but it's
not
   because I don't know what is the best way to do it, it's because:
   A) No matter how many times I've told them, management doesn't want to
listen to me. 
   B) It doesn't want to spend money.
   C) It's not a high priority
   D) The only time they would approve is when a disaster
  happens. This is typical of this company. You gotta work in my company
  to know what I'm talking about.

5- I didn't say I have 600MB left on our mail server. The user's .pst file
is 600MB.
   We have whole bunch of salespeople and others, who have each at least
that much email.

6- I wasn't looking for advice how to set up our email system. I know my
stuff well enough.
   I was just looking for an explanation for this. Instead what I got in
return was insult from you
   and advice on how to set up my mail server and sarcastic remarks from
others, except
   one person, who was actually trying to help me out.
7- So much for my wishful thinking that I can get help here!



-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 2:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


He/she who properly configures his/her doesn't have problems.  Apparently,
you don't follow this model.  

You're the one who started the Again: User is currently out... like Lori
is stupid and can't read.  I merely upgraded to the level deemed necessary
for you.  Call me what you want, think of me what you may...  Fact still
remains, you're housing improperly configured servers and clients.  I more
than get it, you can't dignify anything because you have nothing useful to
dignify.

Configure your sh!t properly and then come talk some trash.  Til then...
PEACE OUT!

-Original Message-
From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 11:34 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


What kind of language is this??? WTF you think you are??!!!
If you're so thick that you don't get it, don't go insulting people. I'm not
gonna dignify you with an explanation, cause you're too much of a DA to get
it!!!

-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 2:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


Again JackA$$!!  If you have an Exchange server, WTF are you popping mail to
a PST file for?

-Original Message-
From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 11:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


Again: User is currently out of office and not poping email. Therefore all
new emails are going to sit on the server. They'll stay there until she/he
opens up Outlook and pops them. Then they'll be on the .pst file. The point
is email is being delivered, while the sender is receiving a bounced message
to the contrary, back from System Administrator.

It's being delivered to the .pst file because I don't have room on the
server for more than 600 MB of email! Yes I know all about .pst files being
not the ideal place to store email, but I can't bring down the server right
now, just to add hard drive!

I'm looking to find out why is this happening?

-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 2:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


Then why do you say user is receiving

RE: Weird message from System Administrator

2001-10-26 Thread Alex Alborzfard

I don't have time for this kinda BS.
Except for some useless trash talk, you still couldn't figure it out either!
Here is a tip for you: Mr. BIGSHOT KNOW IT ALL, learn some manners!

-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 3:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


I understand that there is a care bear exchange list you can subscribe to.
Maybe you should try there...

Item #1: Email doesn't necessarily say what you mean
Item #2: Sure she can talk for herself.  However, we've been around here for
quite a few years so we tend to say what we want.
Item #3: I saw that, she's a very nice person and I would expect that of
her.
Item #4: I have been in that position before with the exact opposite results
you came up with.  I wonder why...
Item #5: Your point is what?!?  My mailbox is 700MB, I've seen others over a
GB.  Big Deal, I've got plenty of disk space and I would never nor will I
ever advocate the use of PST's with an Exchange server. 
Item #6: Apparently not.  Not likely.   Waaahh...
Item #7: Here's $.35, call someone who cares and ask for a refund.

-Original Message-
From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 12:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator



1- I was trying to clarify my situation better for her.
   Contrary to what you thought, I wasn't trying to be condescending to her.

2- Even if I did, can't talk for herself?! Who are you, her lawyer??!
   Still it doesn't give you the right to insult people like that. And you
call
   yourself a computer professional??!

3- She responded to my email without any of the trash talk you did!

4- I am fully aware of our email system is not properly configured, but it's
not
   because I don't know what is the best way to do it, it's because:
   A) No matter how many times I've told them, management doesn't want to
listen to me. 
   B) It doesn't want to spend money.
   C) It's not a high priority
   D) The only time they would approve is when a disaster
  happens. This is typical of this company. You gotta work in my company
  to know what I'm talking about.

5- I didn't say I have 600MB left on our mail server. The user's .pst file
is 600MB.
   We have whole bunch of salespeople and others, who have each at least
that much email.

6- I wasn't looking for advice how to set up our email system. I know my
stuff well enough.
   I was just looking for an explanation for this. Instead what I got in
return was insult from you
   and advice on how to set up my mail server and sarcastic remarks from
others, except
   one person, who was actually trying to help me out.
7- So much for my wishful thinking that I can get help here!



-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 2:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


He/she who properly configures his/her doesn't have problems.  Apparently,
you don't follow this model.  

You're the one who started the Again: User is currently out... like Lori
is stupid and can't read.  I merely upgraded to the level deemed necessary
for you.  Call me what you want, think of me what you may...  Fact still
remains, you're housing improperly configured servers and clients.  I more
than get it, you can't dignify anything because you have nothing useful to
dignify.

Configure your sh!t properly and then come talk some trash.  Til then...
PEACE OUT!

-Original Message-
From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 11:34 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


What kind of language is this??? WTF you think you are??!!!
If you're so thick that you don't get it, don't go insulting people. I'm not
gonna dignify you with an explanation, cause you're too much of a DA to get
it!!!

-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 2:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


Again JackA$$!!  If you have an Exchange server, WTF are you popping mail to
a PST file for?

-Original Message-
From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 11:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


Again: User is currently out of office and not poping email. Therefore all
new emails are going to sit on the server. They'll stay there until she/he
opens up Outlook and pops them. Then they'll be on the .pst file. The point
is email is being delivered, while the sender is receiving a bounced message
to the contrary, back from System Administrator.

It's being delivered to the .pst file because I don't have room on the
server for more than 600 MB of email! Yes I know all about .pst files being
not the ideal

RE: Weird message from System Administrator

2001-10-26 Thread Don Ely

Wh


If you noticed I didn't provide you a solution.  But I have seen the
error...  Error IDtenT.

Maybe I didn't give you a solution because your attitude sucks, because I
read your post and saw a suck a$$ attitude.

Again:  If you don't like it here, ask for your subscription fee back!
Maybe I know the answer and maybe I don't.  Worst part is...  You'll never
know.  I'd be willing to bet I have the answer though...  Just a hunch.  I
deal with clients like you all the time.

-Original Message-
From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 1:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


I don't have time for this kinda BS.
Except for some useless trash talk, you still couldn't figure it out either!
Here is a tip for you: Mr. BIGSHOT KNOW IT ALL, learn some manners!

-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 3:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


I understand that there is a care bear exchange list you can subscribe to.
Maybe you should try there...

Item #1: Email doesn't necessarily say what you mean
Item #2: Sure she can talk for herself.  However, we've been around here for
quite a few years so we tend to say what we want. Item #3: I saw that, she's
a very nice person and I would expect that of her. Item #4: I have been in
that position before with the exact opposite results you came up with.  I
wonder why... Item #5: Your point is what?!?  My mailbox is 700MB, I've seen
others over a GB.  Big Deal, I've got plenty of disk space and I would never
nor will I ever advocate the use of PST's with an Exchange server. 
Item #6: Apparently not.  Not likely.   Waaahh...
Item #7: Here's $.35, call someone who cares and ask for a refund.

-Original Message-
From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 12:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator



1- I was trying to clarify my situation better for her.
   Contrary to what you thought, I wasn't trying to be condescending to her.

2- Even if I did, can't talk for herself?! Who are you, her lawyer??!
   Still it doesn't give you the right to insult people like that. And you
call
   yourself a computer professional??!

3- She responded to my email without any of the trash talk you did!

4- I am fully aware of our email system is not properly configured, but it's
not
   because I don't know what is the best way to do it, it's because:
   A) No matter how many times I've told them, management doesn't want to
listen to me. 
   B) It doesn't want to spend money.
   C) It's not a high priority
   D) The only time they would approve is when a disaster
  happens. This is typical of this company. You gotta work in my company
  to know what I'm talking about.

5- I didn't say I have 600MB left on our mail server. The user's .pst file
is 600MB.
   We have whole bunch of salespeople and others, who have each at least
that much email.

6- I wasn't looking for advice how to set up our email system. I know my
stuff well enough.
   I was just looking for an explanation for this. Instead what I got in
return was insult from you
   and advice on how to set up my mail server and sarcastic remarks from
others, except
   one person, who was actually trying to help me out.
7- So much for my wishful thinking that I can get help here!



-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 2:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


He/she who properly configures his/her doesn't have problems.  Apparently,
you don't follow this model.  

You're the one who started the Again: User is currently out... like Lori
is stupid and can't read.  I merely upgraded to the level deemed necessary
for you.  Call me what you want, think of me what you may...  Fact still
remains, you're housing improperly configured servers and clients.  I more
than get it, you can't dignify anything because you have nothing useful to
dignify.

Configure your sh!t properly and then come talk some trash.  Til then...
PEACE OUT!

-Original Message-
From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 11:34 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


What kind of language is this??? WTF you think you are??!!!
If you're so thick that you don't get it, don't go insulting people. I'm not
gonna dignify you with an explanation, cause you're too much of a DA to get
it!!!

-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 2:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


Again JackA$$!!  If you have an Exchange server, WTF are you popping mail to
a PST file for?

-Original Message

RE: Weird message from System Administrator

2001-10-26 Thread Andy David

Does this person have an alternate recipient defined for his/her mailbox?



P.S. Your initial explanation of your problem was not very clear at all. 
You stated :

It's being delivered to the .pst file because I don't have room on the
server for more than 600 MB of email! Yes I know all about .pst files
being
not the ideal place to store email, but I can't bring down the server
right
now, just to add hard drive!

That to me sounds like your mail server has only 600 MG of available space,
not:

 I didn't say I have 600MB left on our mail server. The user's .pst file
is 600MB.  We have whole bunch of salespeople and others, who have each
at least
that much email.(Which you stated later)

Andy



-Original Message-
From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 4:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


I don't have time for this kinda BS.
Except for some useless trash talk, you still couldn't figure it out either!
Here is a tip for you: Mr. BIGSHOT KNOW IT ALL, learn some manners!

-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 3:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


I understand that there is a care bear exchange list you can subscribe to.
Maybe you should try there...

Item #1: Email doesn't necessarily say what you mean
Item #2: Sure she can talk for herself.  However, we've been around here for
quite a few years so we tend to say what we want.
Item #3: I saw that, she's a very nice person and I would expect that of
her.
Item #4: I have been in that position before with the exact opposite results
you came up with.  I wonder why...
Item #5: Your point is what?!?  My mailbox is 700MB, I've seen others over a
GB.  Big Deal, I've got plenty of disk space and I would never nor will I
ever advocate the use of PST's with an Exchange server. 
Item #6: Apparently not.  Not likely.   Waaahh...
Item #7: Here's $.35, call someone who cares and ask for a refund.

-Original Message-
From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 12:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator



1- I was trying to clarify my situation better for her.
   Contrary to what you thought, I wasn't trying to be condescending to her.

2- Even if I did, can't talk for herself?! Who are you, her lawyer??!
   Still it doesn't give you the right to insult people like that. And you
call
   yourself a computer professional??!

3- She responded to my email without any of the trash talk you did!

4- I am fully aware of our email system is not properly configured, but it's
not
   because I don't know what is the best way to do it, it's because:
   A) No matter how many times I've told them, management doesn't want to
listen to me. 
   B) It doesn't want to spend money.
   C) It's not a high priority
   D) The only time they would approve is when a disaster
  happens. This is typical of this company. You gotta work in my company
  to know what I'm talking about.

5- I didn't say I have 600MB left on our mail server. The user's .pst file
is 600MB.
   We have whole bunch of salespeople and others, who have each at least
that much email.

6- I wasn't looking for advice how to set up our email system. I know my
stuff well enough.
   I was just looking for an explanation for this. Instead what I got in
return was insult from you
   and advice on how to set up my mail server and sarcastic remarks from
others, except
   one person, who was actually trying to help me out.
7- So much for my wishful thinking that I can get help here!



-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 2:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


He/she who properly configures his/her doesn't have problems.  Apparently,
you don't follow this model.  

You're the one who started the Again: User is currently out... like Lori
is stupid and can't read.  I merely upgraded to the level deemed necessary
for you.  Call me what you want, think of me what you may...  Fact still
remains, you're housing improperly configured servers and clients.  I more
than get it, you can't dignify anything because you have nothing useful to
dignify.

Configure your sh!t properly and then come talk some trash.  Til then...
PEACE OUT!

-Original Message-
From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 11:34 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


What kind of language is this??? WTF you think you are??!!!
If you're so thick that you don't get it, don't go insulting people. I'm not
gonna dignify you with an explanation, cause you're too much of a DA to get
it!!!

-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26

RE: Weird message from System Administrator

2001-10-26 Thread Don Ely

Thank you Andy!  His email is about as clear as the Potomac River!

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 1:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


Does this person have an alternate recipient defined for his/her mailbox?



P.S. Your initial explanation of your problem was not very clear at all. 
You stated :

It's being delivered to the .pst file because I don't have room on 
the server for more than 600 MB of email! Yes I know all about .pst 
files
being
not the ideal place to store email, but I can't bring down the server
right
now, just to add hard drive!

That to me sounds like your mail server has only 600 MG of available space,
not:

 I didn't say I have 600MB left on our mail server. The user's .pst 
file is 600MB.  We have whole bunch of salespeople and others, who 
have each
at least
that much email.(Which you stated later)

Andy



-Original Message-
From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 4:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


I don't have time for this kinda BS.
Except for some useless trash talk, you still couldn't figure it out either!
Here is a tip for you: Mr. BIGSHOT KNOW IT ALL, learn some manners!

-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 3:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


I understand that there is a care bear exchange list you can subscribe to.
Maybe you should try there...

Item #1: Email doesn't necessarily say what you mean
Item #2: Sure she can talk for herself.  However, we've been around here for
quite a few years so we tend to say what we want. Item #3: I saw that, she's
a very nice person and I would expect that of her. Item #4: I have been in
that position before with the exact opposite results you came up with.  I
wonder why... Item #5: Your point is what?!?  My mailbox is 700MB, I've seen
others over a GB.  Big Deal, I've got plenty of disk space and I would never
nor will I ever advocate the use of PST's with an Exchange server. 
Item #6: Apparently not.  Not likely.   Waaahh...
Item #7: Here's $.35, call someone who cares and ask for a refund.

-Original Message-
From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 12:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator



1- I was trying to clarify my situation better for her.
   Contrary to what you thought, I wasn't trying to be condescending to her.

2- Even if I did, can't talk for herself?! Who are you, her lawyer??!
   Still it doesn't give you the right to insult people like that. And you
call
   yourself a computer professional??!

3- She responded to my email without any of the trash talk you did!

4- I am fully aware of our email system is not properly configured, but it's
not
   because I don't know what is the best way to do it, it's because:
   A) No matter how many times I've told them, management doesn't want to
listen to me. 
   B) It doesn't want to spend money.
   C) It's not a high priority
   D) The only time they would approve is when a disaster
  happens. This is typical of this company. You gotta work in my company
  to know what I'm talking about.

5- I didn't say I have 600MB left on our mail server. The user's .pst file
is 600MB.
   We have whole bunch of salespeople and others, who have each at least
that much email.

6- I wasn't looking for advice how to set up our email system. I know my
stuff well enough.
   I was just looking for an explanation for this. Instead what I got in
return was insult from you
   and advice on how to set up my mail server and sarcastic remarks from
others, except
   one person, who was actually trying to help me out.
7- So much for my wishful thinking that I can get help here!



-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 2:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


He/she who properly configures his/her doesn't have problems.  Apparently,
you don't follow this model.  

You're the one who started the Again: User is currently out... like Lori
is stupid and can't read.  I merely upgraded to the level deemed necessary
for you.  Call me what you want, think of me what you may...  Fact still
remains, you're housing improperly configured servers and clients.  I more
than get it, you can't dignify anything because you have nothing useful to
dignify.

Configure your sh!t properly and then come talk some trash.  Til then...
PEACE OUT!

-Original Message-
From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 11:34 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator


What kind of language is this??? WTF you think you