[expert] Powerpack Md5sums

2003-11-18 Thread Lyvim Xaphir
I need the md5sums for the powerpack edition downloaded from
bittorrent.  Who's got em?

And no I don't care about the theoretically infallible bittorrent
checksums, I just want to check the iso's myself.

LX
-- 
°°°
Linux Mandrake 9.1  Kernel 2.4.21-0.13mdk
Lets face it if winblowz wasn't full of holes
 then it would probably look like Linux
-- Aron Smith, Mandrake OT mailing list
*Catch Star Trek Enterprise, Wednesdays on UPN*



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] (OT)Uh..... Am I alone in noticing the insanity?

2003-11-09 Thread Lyvim Xaphir
On Sun, 2003-11-09 at 11:02, Ronald J. Hall wrote:
 On Sunday 09 November 2003 09:24 am, Praedor Atrebates wrote:
  Well, I gotta say that Redhat does have a point.  I do think that linux is
  not yet ready for the everyday desktop user except for Lindows - for a
  relatively small subpopulation.
 
 Hmm, I disagree. My 10 and 12 year old (not to mention my wife) use Mandrake 
 here with very few problems. 
 
 Sure, my wife uses it almost exclusively for e-mail and web-browsing, but 
 thats what the Windoze majority does anyways, right?
 
 and the boys use it mostly for games...again, following the norm.
 
 Most Windows users run to a local Windog guru when they have problems anyways, 
 and thats what my crowd here does - run to me. So whats the diff? :-)

I've noticed the exact same thing, DL.  In fact a young person I know
recently told me that he could install and run Mandrake without trouble,
yet couldn't seem to get winblowz to operate as easily, and deferred to
a local shop for assistance in getting his winblowz to work correctly.

LX


-- 
°°°
Linux Mandrake 9.1  Kernel 2.4.21-0.13mdk
Filter That, Beach! --Lanman, MDK Newbie List



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Impending drive problem?

2003-11-09 Thread Lyvim Xaphir
On Sun, 2003-11-09 at 10:41, Anne Wilson wrote:
 Recently I have noticed that my drive is noisy from time to time.  It 
 is a 6-month old drive, with an older one as slave.  I have unmounted 
 all the partitions on the old drive, but it is still happening, so I 
 have to assume that it is the new drive.
 
 We have had workmen in the house for over 2 weeks, and there has been 
 an incredible amount of dust.  I cleaned out the inside of the box as 
 well as I could after the main part of the work was complete, but it 
 was only at about time that the noise started.  I think it is when 
 writing to swap.
 
 I suspect that dust has got in where I cannot follow.  How likely is 
 that?
 
 I wonder if I should be buying another drive of the same size, then 
 doing an overnight cp -a to the new drive, then attempting to use 
 rsync to keep them mirrored, just in case.  What do you think?
 
 Anne

Dust won't affect the drive, but heat will.  If the drive is mounted
with another drive right on top or right on the bottom, it can
disentegrate from not being able to shed heat.  One inch of airspace on
top and bottom should be about right.

Another thing is if a drive is left on 24/7, it will not (normally) last
as long as a drive that is powered down.  Which is one reason that I
power down systems that are not being used; the bearings have a finite
number of rotations on them before they fail.  Not just the bearings in
the hard disks but also all the fan/motor bearings.  However that
shouldn't be an issue with a 6 month old drive.

The probability is that you have some sort of manufacturers defect with
this drive and should start thinking about sending it in for
replacement.  If you are dead sure that this drive is the source of the
noise, I would be calling in for an RMA number.

LX
-- 
°°°
Linux Mandrake 9.1  Kernel 2.4.21-0.13mdk
Lets face it if winblowz wasn't full of holes
 then it would probably look like Linux
-- Aron Smith, Mandrake OT mailing list
*Catch Star Trek Enterprise, Wednesdays on UPN*



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Help - my box has been compromised!

2003-11-06 Thread Lyvim Xaphir
On Thu, 2003-11-06 at 01:43, David Guntner wrote:
 Lyvim Xaphir grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
 
  On Thu, 2003-11-06 at 00:18, David E. Fox wrote:
   
   I was under the impression postfix was relay proof - any
   advice will be helpful...
 
 It pretty much is, as long as you didn't break something mucking around 
 with the configuration files.  Out of the box, it has relaying turned 
 off.  You have to do things to it in order to open it up.  Check your 
 config files.
 
  My advice, which again will look like a cop-out, but in actuality is
  very serious, is that you switch to qmail.  Vincent Danen, rpmhelp.net
 
 Oh yea, qmail is great.  If you happen to like pain.
 
 --Dave
 
 (And yes, I've administered sites running qmail.  I'll take postfix every 
 time.)

Personally I've had zero trouble installing qmail and zero trouble
administering qmail.  Most of the complaints I've seen about qmail in my
own work experience have come from people that don't really know what
they are doing, or are too lazy to tackle a learning curve.

The fact is that postfix is not as secure as qmail.  This isn't a matter
that's up for arguability, it's a matter that is an established fact
based on bugtraq archives.  I've been monitoring the bugtraq mailing
list for over 5 years now and I have consistently seen postfix security
problems come up over and over again.  Qmail, on the other hand, has to
have made some kind of Guiness World record for NO security breaches or
problems; ever.  There have been problems with some of the patches that
people have submitted, but there have never been any security problems
with the core programs that were authored by Dan Bernstein.  I
personally have never seen a program with this kind of security record.

I know about the rivalry between postfix and qmail on the newsgroups. 
Based on  the information I have gained over the last 5 years, postfix
has had security problems and qmail has not.  Qmail has a pristine
operating history and postfix does not.  It's just that simple.


LX
-- 
°°°
Linux Mandrake 9.1  Kernel 2.4.21-0.13mdk
Lets face it if winblowz wasn't full of holes
 then it would probably look like Linux
-- Aron Smith, Mandrake OT mailing list
*Catch Star Trek Enterprise, Wednesdays on UPN*



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] help - my box might be a relay

2003-11-05 Thread Lyvim Xaphir
On Wed, 2003-11-05 at 01:23, David E. Fox wrote:
 hey - help!
 
 it's seemingly apparent that in the last week or two there seems to
 be an increasing number of mails of a dubious nature being sent to
 a large number of bogus addresses by yours truly  :(.
 
 I'm not a spammer but it seems that my mailing system (postfix) is
 misconfigured -- but I was under the impression that postfix was
 relay-proof. I have seen evidence though of some chinese sites 
 masquerading as m206-157.dsl.tsoft.com, probably forging headers
 somewhere along the line. It further seems that mail is injected here
 and then attempts are made to send the sh*t off to other places.
 
 I have not gotten any complaints but as of now 22:30pm pst 11/4 there is
 approximately 2.3 megabytes' worth of mail trying to get out.
 
 1) I want to simply remove these messages. How do I do this? I have not yet
 come across a queue removal program - like lprm - for mail. Can (or should)
 I just delete all the files underneath /var/spool/postfix/{defer,etc,deferred,
 etc} - i.e, keep the directory structure intact but do somehting like
 
 find /var/spool/postfix -type f | xargs grep rm
 
 Is that dangerous?
 
 Secondly, using a fairly stock configuration for postfix, is there some-
 thing I've missed? I can attach my configuration if needed. I have 
 basically kept the same one intact since I initially reinstalled 9.0
 and upgraded to various levels of cooker over the past few months.
 
 HELP ;)
 
 
 David E. Fox  Thanks for letting me
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]change magnetic patterns
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]   on your hard disk.
 ---
 


This will be a blatantly and obscenely obvious cop-out, but have you
ever tried qmail.

Cause IMO it's just better than the rest.  Just wondering... ;)

LX

P.S.  The new transmitter is in place. :)

-- 
°°°
Linux Mandrake 9.1  Kernel 2.4.21-0.13mdk
*Catch Star Trek Enterprise, Wednesdays on UPN*



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Help - my box has been compromised!

2003-11-05 Thread Lyvim Xaphir
On Thu, 2003-11-06 at 00:18, David E. Fox wrote:
 Folks - especially postfix people - I need some help - 
 my box seems to have been turned into an open relay. I am
 running the same postfix configuration file I had installed 
 when I was running 9.0 and later versions (currently I 
 am running 9.2/cooker)..
 
 
 I have not been able to post to the list or send out any
 smtp email until I fix this and in the meantime have
 simply flushed (deleted) the outgoing queue in /var/spool
 /postfix via 
 
   # find . /var/spool/postfix -type -f | xargs exec rm
 
 which (quickly) removes it. I removed many megabytes' worth
 of stuck email this way earlier today only to find that at
 9 pm there was 4 megs more waiting and my isp admin had sent
 me a mail saying he disabled my smtp.
 
 
 I was under the impression postfix was relay proof - any
 advice will be helpful...
 
 Thanks!
 

My advice, which again will look like a cop-out, but in actuality is
very serious, is that you switch to qmail.  Vincent Danen, rpmhelp.net

LX
-- 
°°°
Linux Mandrake 9.1  Kernel 2.4.21-0.13mdk
Lets face it if winblowz wasn't full of holes
 then it would probably look like Linux
-- Aron Smith, Mandrake OT mailing list
*Catch Star Trek Enterprise, Wednesdays on UPN*



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Geomagnetic storm alert

2003-10-24 Thread Lyvim Xaphir
On Fri, 2003-10-24 at 02:36, John Wilson wrote:
 On October 23, 2003 07:17 pm, Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
  I just heard on Fox news that a pseudo-solar flare has erupted on the
  sun, and we now have a massive wave of electromagnetic energy and
  particles headed our way.  It's due to hit tommorrow.  No kidding.
 
  Supposedly the max rating for such a storm is G5, this storm is
  supposed to be G3 or so.  Satellite communications might be disrupted
  and they say cell phone communications are at risk as well.  Anything
  that's wireless may be affected.  I will probably definitely be affected
  since my internet connection is satellite uplink.
 
  Anyways, watch out for voltage spikes and stuff like that.
 
 
  LX
 
 
 Dunno what Fox was on about but you can no more get a voltage spike from solar 
 flares than you can from making tea. :-)

Sorry, but you are wrong on that.  Historically solar flares have played
havoc with *both* telecommunications and power grids.  FYI:

http://www.star.ucl.ac.uk/~idh/STROBEL/starsun/strsuna.htm


Solar flares are eruptions more powerful than surge prominences. They
will last only few minutes to a few hours. A lot of ionized material is
ejected in a flare. Unlike the material in prominences, the solar flare
material moves with enough energy to escape the Sun's gravity. When this
burst of ions reaches the Earth, it interferes with radio communication.
Sometimes a solar flare will cause voltage pulses or surges in power and
telephone lines. Brownouts or blackouts may result. Humans travelling
outside the protection of the Earth's magnetic field will need to have
shielding from the powerful ions in a flare.

 
 What you do get is messed up satellite communications and the probability of 
 all communications running through the air of messing up at some high point 
 and at some frequency levels.  As cell phones operate in a vulnerable 
 frequency range it's a good bet.
 
 There is every possibility, depending on the severity of the storm that some 
 broadcast fequencies will be messed up as well.  Things like Short Wave, for 
 example.
 
 AC voltage operates at the relatively sluggish rate of 60Hz, far below the 
 1 GHz and higher range that these things generally affect.
 
 What those like Femme may be able to see is a spectacular display of the 
 Northern Lights, assuming it's a clear night.  Sadly, I won't see much.  Too 
 much light from the city and far too many large mountains in the way. :)
 
 For those of us in the telecom biz it means we get to cover a monsterous 
 number of sins of ommission and commission by blaming it all on the sun. :-)
 
Heh.  A golden opportunity. :)


Well, I for one can tell you that I'm having problems right now.  My
uplink is going online and offline, pretty continuously.  I have to wait
for an online time slice before I send anything.


 ttfn
 
 John

LX


-- 
°°°
Linux Mandrake 9.1  Kernel 2.4.21-0.13mdk
*Catch Star Trek Enterprise, Wednesdays on UPN*



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Re: [OT] Geomagnetic storm alert

2003-10-24 Thread Lyvim Xaphir
On Fri, 2003-10-24 at 08:16, stefmit wrote:
 Is it true that the effects of this related to the gravitational forces may 
 make the aurora effect appear in the sky more proeminent further South than 
 usual?

Yes...the massive stream of particles being channeled to the poles is
supposed to give some really nice Aurora borealis lights.

LX

-- 
°°°
Linux Mandrake 9.1  Kernel 2.4.21-0.13mdk
*Catch Star Trek Enterprise, Wednesdays on UPN*



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] [OT] Geomagnetic storm alert

2003-10-24 Thread Lyvim Xaphir
On Fri, 2003-10-24 at 16:31, J.C. Woods wrote:

 
 Sheesh, what next? Can we get an explanation of this phenomenon based on 
 Heisenberg's principle of uncertainty. After all, when dealing with 
 charged particles, you wouldn't want to omit any kind of explanation 
 based on quantum mechanics, would you? And, while we our at it, how 
 about the simple application of Planck's constant? It is a thorough 
 understanding we seek, yes?

Lol..
 
 Hey LX, did you have any notion that your *simple* heads up on a 
 condition that could affect wireless communications would go so far? You 
 should have known, you have been here a long time, my friend. Well, I am 
 locked and loaded so let those particles come
 
 drjung

I had no idea, my brother.  It was originally a newsflash, not an exam
essay.

LX

-- 
°°°
Linux Mandrake 9.1  Kernel 2.4.21-0.13mdk
*Catch Star Trek Enterprise, Wednesdays on UPN*



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] [OT] Geomagnetic storm alert

2003-10-24 Thread Lyvim Xaphir
On Fri, 2003-10-24 at 19:20, Carroll Grigsby wrote:
 On Friday 24 October 2003 06:12 pm, Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
  On Fri, 2003-10-24 at 16:31, J.C. Woods wrote:
   Sheesh, what next? Can we get an explanation of this phenomenon based on
   Heisenberg's principle of uncertainty. After all, when dealing with
   charged particles, you wouldn't want to omit any kind of explanation
   based on quantum mechanics, would you? And, while we our at it, how
   about the simple application of Planck's constant? It is a thorough
   understanding we seek, yes?
 
  Lol..
 
   Hey LX, did you have any notion that your *simple* heads up on a
   condition that could affect wireless communications would go so far? You
   should have known, you have been here a long time, my friend. Well, I am
   locked and loaded so let those particles come
  
   drjung
 
  I had no idea, my brother.  It was originally a newsflash, not an exam
  essay.
 
  LX
 
 Let's cut to the chase. Should I wear my tinfoil hat or not?
 -- cmg

You need passive shielding to stop the cosmic rays from causing DNA and
cellular damage, so the hat should be lead, about three feet thick or
so.  Actually I need to run the numbers for lead against a 1 GeV
particle running 87% the speed of light to get the exact thickness. 
Three feet seems like a good start.

This same hat would help against a neutron bomb detonation, as long as
you were in a concrete bunker.


LX
-- 
°°°
Linux Mandrake 9.1  Kernel 2.4.21-0.13mdk
*Catch Star Trek Enterprise, Wednesdays on UPN*



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


[expert] Download and Powerpack editions

2003-10-23 Thread Lyvim Xaphir


This may be a stupid question and apologies if it is, but I just got the
Powerpack edition in after a solid week of bittorrent downloading, and
I'm wondering if there is any possible reason that I might need the
Download edition.

If there is something on the Download that's not in Powerpack, or some
other reason I might need Download, then I need to get started
downloading as Bittorrent is going to keep me occupied for another
week.  I want to go ahead and serve my time in bittorrent prison if I
need to.

I'm on expert so I figure I don't need humor tags.


LX
-- 
°°°
Linux Mandrake 9.1  Kernel 2.4.21-0.13mdk
*Catch Star Trek Enterprise, Wednesdays on UPN*



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


RE: [expert] Download and Powerpack editions

2003-10-23 Thread Lyvim Xaphir
On Thu, 2003-10-23 at 15:57, JOHAM,DAVID (HP-Boise,ex1) wrote:
 It's OK to use bittorrent to download the powerpack if you're a silver
 member or above of MandrakeClub. That's how I got my copy.
 
 David
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Gonzalo
 Avaria
 Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 10:54 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [expert] Download and Powerpack editions
 
 
 On Thursday 23 October 2003 19:36, Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
  If there is something on the Download that's not in Powerpack, or some
  other reason I might need Download, then I need to get started
  downloading as Bittorrent is going to keep me occupied for another
  week.  I want to go ahead and serve my time in bittorrent prison if I
  need to.
 
 And you are using a P2P to download a pay distro??? I don´t think that´s 
 correct to ask here... 
 Sorry but don´t like this kind of posting.

What the hell don't you like about it?  I'm a long time list contributor
and a silver member of Mandrakeclub, which is how I got access to the
download in the first place.  You got a problem with that?

LX
-- 
°°°
Linux Mandrake 9.1  Kernel 2.4.21-0.13mdk
*Catch Star Trek Enterprise, Wednesdays on UPN*



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Download and Powerpack editions

2003-10-23 Thread Lyvim Xaphir
On Thu, 2003-10-23 at 15:48, Markus Ueberall wrote:
 On Thu, 23 Oct 2003, Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
 
  I just got the
  Powerpack edition in after a solid week of bittorrent downloading, and
  I'm wondering if there is any possible reason that I might need the
  Download edition.
 
 I can't think of any -- in other words: you don't  :)
 
 Ad astra,


I *like* that level of confidence.  ;)

LX

-- 
°°°
Linux Mandrake 9.1  Kernel 2.4.21-0.13mdk
*Catch Star Trek Enterprise, Wednesdays on UPN*



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Download and Powerpack editions

2003-10-23 Thread Lyvim Xaphir
On Thu, 2003-10-23 at 13:41, Gonzalo Avaria wrote:
  Thanks, now i know that. Maybe in a few years i become silver, now i´m only
  a student with schoolarchip, so only can use the download edition.
  I apologize for the latest post.
  Greetings
  
 I'm posting this one again, maybe you were too much angry with me or anything 
 else, but i would like to apologize... i din´t know that it was the only way 
 of downloading, so please, again forgive me.

Well, damn...you're a nice guy and not a pinhead.  Sorry I popped off
like that, I'm hair triggered for pinheads because of the large pinhead
population.  Not your fault, but certainly mine.  Plus I haven't had my
full dose of green tea today...so sorry about that.

Why don't we turn lemons into lemonade and get you signed up as a
Mandrakeclub member so you can download the Powerpack edition too.  Just
an idea.

Take care,


LX

-- 
°°°
Linux Mandrake 9.1  Kernel 2.4.21-0.13mdk
*Catch Star Trek Enterprise, Wednesdays on UPN*



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


[expert] Geomagnetic storm alert

2003-10-23 Thread Lyvim Xaphir
I just heard on Fox news that a pseudo-solar flare has erupted on the
sun, and we now have a massive wave of electromagnetic energy and
particles headed our way.  It's due to hit tommorrow.  No kidding.

Supposedly the max rating for such a storm is G5, this storm is
supposed to be G3 or so.  Satellite communications might be disrupted
and they say cell phone communications are at risk as well.  Anything
that's wireless may be affected.  I will probably definitely be affected
since my internet connection is satellite uplink.

Anyways, watch out for voltage spikes and stuff like that.


LX
-- 
°°°
Linux Mandrake 9.1  Kernel 2.4.21-0.13mdk
*Catch Star Trek Enterprise, Wednesdays on UPN*



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


[expert] Bittorrent bandwidth maximization

2003-10-21 Thread Lyvim Xaphir

OK, I've looked at the faqs and I've read the expert list.  I'm still
getting a max of 7.6 K/sec download speed where I should be seeing
between 70 to 90 K/sec.

I fiddled with the download.py file, finally changing it to:

 ('max_upload_rate', 0,
'maximum kB/s to upload at, 0 means no limit'),

and

 ('max_uploads', 0,
the maximum number of uploads to allow at once.),


This increased my download speed from 2 something to what it is now,
which is 7 to 8 K/sec.  I tried None, 13, but that caused it to bomb
out altogether.  I'm running bittorrent-3.3-2mdk which was pointed at by
the Mandrakeclub site.  I'm not running the gui I'm just running the
ncurses version.  Can somebody point me to a faq I haven't seen or tell
me something I haven't tried to increase download speed.  I've been
downloading for two days now and I'm only at 5.9%.


TIA

LX

__
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search
http://shopping.yahoo.com

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] 9.2 pre-orders

2003-09-23 Thread Lyvim Xaphir
On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 09:33, Carroll Grigsby wrote:
 On Monday 22 September 2003 07:52 am, Bryan Phinney wrote:
 
  whack
 
  That having been said, I still don't see this as being applicable to the
  discussion.  Unless we are suggesting that Mandrake Linux is installable
  and configurable by an unsophisticated user who would be the person most
  likely to purchase an OS from a retail chain, the the existence of retail
  boxed sets is immaterial.  Assume for an instant that your mother or
  grandmother were to purchase Mandrake from a retail chain, do you think
  that the experience installing and configuring will be fair to the
  distribution and recommend further purchases by others?
 
 I started with a copy of Mandrake 7.0 PowerPack at the local Staples. Took it 
 home, installed it, and went surfing -- within an hour or so. I had done some 
 research about installation and hardware beforehand (and I had both a blank 
 HD and PartitionMagic available), but the ease of installation blew me away. 
 I continued to buy each new version at some local store until  8.1, when I 
 started to buy from the Store to give Mandrake a bigger share of my bucks.
 
 I'd suggest that the way to look at the mass market chains (office supply 
 places, bookstores, CompUSA, etc) is that those outlets get the Mandrake name 
 out where people see it. While the Mandrake name is well known and well liked 
 within the Linux community, I submit that it is largely unknown in the 
 outside world.
 
 BTW, from what I read elsewhere, I doubt that your mother/grandmother would be 
 able to install any breed of Windows without some serious problems, let alone 
 all of the other apps that are needed before Windows can do anything useful.
 
 -- cmg
 

This is correct; currently Window's installations are much harder to
complete than Mandrake installations.  This is not publicized well
enough.

LX
-- 
°°°
Linux Mandrake 9.1  Kernel 2.4.21-0.13mdk
*Catch Star Trek Enterprise, Wednesdays on UPN*



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] I'm in big trouble

2003-09-06 Thread Lyvim Xaphir
On Sat, 2003-09-06 at 16:53, Ronald J. Hall wrote:
 On Saturday 06 September 2003 04:28 pm, Anne Wilson wrote:
  On Saturday 06 Sep 2003 9:08 pm, Guilmot Mike wrote:
Apu???
  
   Apu nahaseesomething ... in The Simpsons ? :-)
  
   Kind regards,
  
   Guilmot Mike
 
  Ah - I must be the only person in the western world that has never
  seen The Simpsons g
 
  Anne
 
 Not to worry - I don't think I've ever watched a complete episode. ;-)

You do watch Enterprise, though...right?  :)

LX

-- 
°°°
Linux Mandrake 9.1  Kernel 2.4.21-0.13mdk
*Catch Star Trek Enterprise, Wednesdays on UPN*



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


[expert] Poll: Successful Boot Disk Creation

2003-09-02 Thread Lyvim Xaphir


How many people here can successfully create a boot disk under 9.1 or
9.2 using mkbootdisk and a 1.4 meg floppy?


LX

-- 
°°°
Linux Mandrake 9.1  Kernel 2.4.21-0.13mdk
*Catch Star Trek Enterprise, Wednesdays on UPN*



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Poll: Successful Boot Disk Creation

2003-09-02 Thread Lyvim Xaphir
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 10:51, Mark wrote:
 On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
 
  
  
  How many people here can successfully create a boot disk under 9.1 or
  9.2 using mkbootdisk and a 1.4 meg floppy?
  
  
  LX
 
 Well...when I first loaded 9.1 thats how I had to do it to get a boot 
 floppy. 

Have you tested the bootdisk?

LX
-- 
°°°
Linux Mandrake 9.1  Kernel 2.4.21-0.13mdk
*Catch Star Trek Enterprise, Wednesdays on UPN*



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] XFS mount problems

2003-08-28 Thread Lyvim Xaphir
On Wed, 2003-08-27 at 12:53, Brant Fitzsimmons wrote:
 Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
 
 On Wed, 2003-08-27 at 02:59, Brant Fitzsimmons wrote:
 
   
 
 I've found the problem.
 
 diskdrake didn't change the fomatting of the drive when I converted (or 
 thought I had) them from reiserfs to xfs.  It only changed the entry in 
 fstab.  It was trying to mount reiserfs drives as xfs.  When I thought I 
 had formatted them I apparently didn't know that the Format button 
 doesn't do anything.  I haven't checked bugzilla for this yet, but I 
 guess I will.
 
 That would explain why, as one poster suggested, manually creating the 
 file system did the trick where doing it through diskdrake did not.
 
 I found out what was wrong by starting an install of Mandrake 9.2 Beta 
 2.  It was reporting the file system as reiserfs-- contradicting what 
 diskdrake was saying (xfs).
 
 Anyway... now to manually create the xfs partitions...
 
 Thanks everyone-- for the suggestions.
 
 
 
 If you might remember it was one of my last suggestions to mount the
 partitions as reiser. ;)
 
 LX
 
 
 It sure was...but did you know why it was a good suggestion?  :-P

Yes!!


;)

LX

P.S.  The clue was that you had successfully used the partitions before
you rebooted.  So therefore I was betting it was something simple like
that and that your data was intact.
-- 
°°°
Linux Mandrake 9.1  Kernel 2.4.21-0.13mdk
*Catch Star Trek Enterprise, Wednesdays on UPN*



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] I cannot see what I write here

2003-08-28 Thread Lyvim Xaphir
On Thu, 2003-08-28 at 12:18, J.C. Woods wrote:
 Alan Wilter Sousa da Silva wrote:
 
 Thanks Carroll, I got my own message too.
 
 On Thu, 28 Aug 2003, Carroll Grigsby wrote:
 
   
 
 On Thursday 28 August 2003 08:50 am, Alan Wilter Sousa da Silva wrote:
 
 
 Hi List!
 
 It's more a test.  I know that my e-mail to this list is going because I
 got answers but I cannot see back what I sent!  Hope to be wrong... Let's
 see.
 
 Cheers,
 --
 Alan Wilter Sousa da Silva
 --
   
 
 It comes in here. (You should get two copies of this -- one direct and one via 
 the list.)
 -- cmg
 
 
 
 
 So are we all happy now?


LOL!!

LX
-- 
°°°
Linux Mandrake 9.1  Kernel 2.4.21-0.13mdk
*Catch Star Trek Enterprise, Wednesdays on UPN*



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] XFS mount problems

2003-08-27 Thread Lyvim Xaphir
On Tue, 2003-08-26 at 23:15, Brant Fitzsimmons wrote:
 Hello all,
 
 Can anyone help me diagnose why my previously working (reiserfs), now 
 formatted with XFS, hard drives will no longer mount?
 
 I did the transition from reiserfs to XFS in diskdrake.  It asked, and I 
 allowed it, to write to my fstab file.  As far as I can tell it wrote it

Your fstab file does not matter at all in this context, which is to
achieve a basic mount of the drives.  The only reason an fstab file
exists is so that parameters can be passed to mount by a script and
approved by root.

The main concern right now is, have your drives been corrupted.  If
mount cannot do a manual operation, then that means it's not seeing what
it is supposed to be seeing when you make the attempt.  Don't want to
worry you but this isn't good.  It's still probably something simple,
though.

To verify that this is or is not the case the next thing is you need to
do is comment out everything pertaining to the partitions in question in
fstab and start mount attempts manually, because at this point fstab is
redundant and is only going to get in your way; at least until you
achieve a successful manual mount. After you get rid or disable the
relevant entries in fstab, again attempt to mount them xfs.  If they
won't mount xfs, then boot your 9.1 cdrom and go into rescue mode.  NOW
attempt to mount xfs.  If it still won't go then try to mount them
reiser.  If that doesn't work...

Well, give that a shot and we'll go from there.

LX



  
 correctly, but after a shutdown and unplug (to avoid damage in a 
 lightning storm) the drives will no longer mount at boot, nor can I 
 mount them manually.  I used them for a few hours, copying 28GBs of data 
 back and forth without any problems before I had to shutdown.
 
 The Pertinent lines in my fstab are:
 
 /dev/hdg1 /drive2 xfs defaults 1 2
 /dev/hdh1 /drive3 xfs defaults 1 2
 
 Here are the lines from my previously working configuration (before they 
 were converted to XFS):
 
 /dev/hdg1 /drive2 reiserfs notail 1 2
 /dev/hdh1 /drive3 reiserfs notail 1 2
 
 Any suggestions?
-- 
°°°
Linux Mandrake 9.1  Kernel 2.4.21-0.13mdk
*Catch Star Trek Enterprise, Wednesdays on UPN*



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] XFS mount problems

2003-08-27 Thread Lyvim Xaphir
On Wed, 2003-08-27 at 02:59, Brant Fitzsimmons wrote:

 
 I've found the problem.
 
 diskdrake didn't change the fomatting of the drive when I converted (or 
 thought I had) them from reiserfs to xfs.  It only changed the entry in 
 fstab.  It was trying to mount reiserfs drives as xfs.  When I thought I 
 had formatted them I apparently didn't know that the Format button 
 doesn't do anything.  I haven't checked bugzilla for this yet, but I 
 guess I will.
 
 That would explain why, as one poster suggested, manually creating the 
 file system did the trick where doing it through diskdrake did not.
 
 I found out what was wrong by starting an install of Mandrake 9.2 Beta 
 2.  It was reporting the file system as reiserfs-- contradicting what 
 diskdrake was saying (xfs).
 
 Anyway... now to manually create the xfs partitions...
 
 Thanks everyone-- for the suggestions.

If you might remember it was one of my last suggestions to mount the
partitions as reiser. ;)

LX
-- 
°°°
Linux Mandrake 9.1  Kernel 2.4.21-0.13mdk
*Catch Star Trek Enterprise, Wednesdays on UPN*



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] ATA RAID

2003-08-20 Thread Lyvim Xaphir
On Tue, 2003-08-19 at 21:55, Carroll Grigsby wrote:
 On Tuesday 19 August 2003 08:51 am, Felix Miata wrote:
  I looked at mandrakeuser.org and tldp.org and found nothing on this
  subject. Before I go looking anywhere else for non-Mandrake-specific
  coverage of this subject, anyone here know of good coverage on using
  Highpoint motherboard RAID with Mandrake?
 
 Felix:
 Way back when (summer 2001?), there was some traffic on the newbie list about 
 these things. FWIW, Civileme didn't like them; he was a strong proponent of 
 software-based RAID. Perhaps those problems have been resolved since then, 
 but I've learned never to bet against Civileme.
 -- cmg

Whoa there, tex.  The Highpoint controllers can be used with Linux
software raid to greater advantage than the standard raid controllers;
they provide better performance.  In other words you don't run them
native, you run them with SW raid, and you end up with a better setup.

Meanwhile that leaves the two original vanilla IDE channels open for
other uses.

LX
-- 
°°°
Linux Mandrake 9.1  Kernel 2.4.21-0.13mdk
*Catch Star Trek Enterprise, Wednesdays on UPN*



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] ATA RAID

2003-08-20 Thread Lyvim Xaphir
On Tue, 2003-08-19 at 20:31, Greg Meyer wrote:
 On Tuesday 19 August 2003 01:33 pm, Bryan Phinney wrote:
  I have a Hpt372 on my motherboard and had to turn it off in the BIOS since
  with standard 9.1, it causes a kernel panic that kills Mandrake.  I did
  recompile the kernel with the Highpoint drivers and got it to the point
  where it wouldn't kernel panic when starting Linux but it still would not
  see the hard drives on that controller.
 
 I have a 372 on my Motherboard, Soyo KT-400 Dragon Ultra that works fine as a 
 standard ATA controller.  RAID can then be achieved with the Linux 
 RAID-tools.
 
 Are you sure it is the Highpoint COntroller causing the kernel panic and not 
 the APIC or something.

I also have a Highpoint controller and my Raid array is on itworking
flawlessly under 9.1.  The Highpoint controllers provide better
performance than a standard set of IDE channels.  They also leave your
standard IDE channels open for other uses.

LX

-- 
°°°
Linux Mandrake 9.1  Kernel 2.4.21-0.13mdk
*Catch Star Trek Enterprise, Wednesdays on UPN*



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] OT: router reboots

2003-08-19 Thread Lyvim Xaphir
On Mon, 2003-08-18 at 16:10, Anne Wilson wrote:
 On Monday 18 Aug 2003 9:03 pm, Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
  On Thu, 2003-08-14 at 07:52, Anne Wilson wrote:
   SMC Barricade 7401BRA adsl router
  
   On average, about once a week I have to reboot my router.  No
   apparent reason - just that no Internet connection works any
   more.  After a reboot, all is well, both on this box and all
   others on the net.  I am not able to find any common denominator
   leading up to the problem. Any ideas, anyone?
  
   Anne
 
  Does it have firmware that you can update.  I'd check on that
  first.
 
  --LX
 
 Hi, LX.  Franki raised that one, but my reply to him was one of the 
 ones that went missing, never appeared on the list.  Here is what I 
 said to him:
 
 Hi, Franki.  A little while ago I downloaded the latest flash for the 
 router and the installation instructions, which were to flash it from 
 within the web page. 'Mine not to reason why'. I thought, and tried 
 it.  It didn't work.  I contacted their tech support, who said they 
 would email alternative instructions.  They did, and it didn't work.  
 It did screw up everything that had been there before, though, so I 
 had to go in an reconfigure it.  There was a complication in that I 
 couldn't get a connection, which my isp traced to a line fault, which 
 BT denied, but a short time after it was working again.  Then I rang 
 SMC's tech support again.  This time a guy asked me why I was trying 
 to flash it.  He rather rudely said it was pointless - it was not 
 necessary with the revision I had got.

You should have told him that it was none of his damn business WHAT you
were doing with your own equipment, and that if you wanted to pee on it
in the shower then that's exactly what you were going to do, and that
the only input you would need from him at that point would be to
recommend the best way to do the most damage.

Their job, quite simply, is not to question what you are doing but
rather to tell you how to do it.  Many times a phone jock will tell you
something either because they have read entirely too much BOFH lit or
because they don't want to bother with the call cause they've got a
personal call they'd rather be on.

The first thing to do before you pick up the phone for tech support is
to realize *what their job is*.  Because 90% of the time, THEY DONT. 
They are not the equipment police of your house, their job is to tell
you how to flash their shite equipment.  Any other words out of their
mouth are extra and not needed.

Any chance for them to be arrogant and assume ignorance on your part is
usually a chance they will take.  In the past, in such situations, I
have thrown out some ignorance bait and then fed the rope out quite a
bit.  Then at the appropriate time, I yank on the rope, pull them back
in, and do maximum damage.  I do what I can to discourage this type of
behavior.


 
 Between that experience and the fact that it is impossible to release 
 a range of ports for a session (ideally I would like it to be 
 software triggered, but I'll do it manually if necessary) I feel that 
 when I replace it, it will not be with an SMC product.
 
 If I may, I will also copy in my replies to Ronald and Miark, which 
 also went missing.
 
---snip, I agree with Ronald that this is not a dhcp thing-

I'll be honest, the first thing that occurred to me when you described
your problem was that a security hole was being taken advantage of with
your router.  Most of the time when a firmware release is given on a
router, it's to address a security hole problem.  This reboot problem
sounded to me as if you were being scanned periodically and the scan was
locking your router up.  This is why I recommended a firmware flash, so
that you could begin analyzing the problem from a fresh and more secure
perspective.  Of course now we have phone jock assholes standing in our
way of that.

The objective is to get the router flashed with the latest firmware
revision, and then reexamine the problem to see if you have any further
lockups.  If lockups still are happening after you bring the router up
to the latest firmware release, then it's an equipment problem and the
router needs to be replaced under warranty.

Also...flashing is something you only have to do once.  After you flash
it one time, the firmware is in there and you don't need to do anything
else except start watching it's behavior for anomalies again. (unless
another firmware revision is released.)

LX

-- 
°°°
Linux Mandrake 9.1  Kernel 2.4.21-0.13mdk
*Catch Star Trek Enterprise, Wednesdays on UPN*



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] OT: router reboots

2003-08-18 Thread Lyvim Xaphir
On Thu, 2003-08-14 at 07:52, Anne Wilson wrote:
 SMC Barricade 7401BRA adsl router
 
 On average, about once a week I have to reboot my router.  No apparent 
 reason - just that no Internet connection works any more.  After a 
 reboot, all is well, both on this box and all others on the net.  I 
 am not able to find any common denominator leading up to the problem.  
 Any ideas, anyone?
 
 Anne

Does it have firmware that you can update.  I'd check on that first.

--LX
-- 
°°°
Linux Mandrake 9.1  Kernel 2.4.21-0.13mdk
*Catch Star Trek Enterprise, Wednesdays on UPN*



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Oh, and BTW...you guys owe SCO $1399.00

2003-08-14 Thread Lyvim Xaphir
On Wed, 2003-08-06 at 05:03, J.C. Woods wrote:
 Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
 
 For the copy of Mandrake you now have.  Wait...check that: it's $1399.00
 for every CPU that's running a copy of kernel 2.4 or above.
 
 Who's ready to pay?
 
 SCO ready to clean out Linux users for $1399 per CPU
 By Ashlee Vance in Chicago
 Posted: 05/08/2003 at 21:35 GM
 
 http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/53/32187.html
 
 ---Small slice of the article -
 
 Linux users face a serious question. Is $699 too much to pay for a good
 bath? 
 
 The $699 scrubbing fee is exactly how much SCO wants for one CPU's worth
 of a Linux license, and that's just for the time being. Come October 15,
 the single CPU fee jumps to a whopping $1,399. 
 
 This is the latest word from SCO handed down by Mr. Clean himself - SCO
 CEO Darl McBride, during a Tuesday conference call. SCO had been holding
 out on exactly how much it planned to charge Linux users for their use
 of what it claims is borrowed Unix code, but now all has been made clear
 - crystal clear. .
 
 
 LX
   
 
 Hey LX,
 
 At about the same time as when they pry my gun from my cold, dead hand, 
 they can have the money too
 
 drjung

Amen, brother. :)

LX

-- 
°°°
Linux Mandrake 9.1  Kernel 2.4.21-0.13mdk
Filter That, Beach! --Lanman, MDK Newbie List



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] cdbakeoven first try bad

2003-08-14 Thread Lyvim Xaphir
On Wed, 2003-08-06 at 00:56, David E. Fox wrote:
 I'm using what seems to be an old version of cdbakeoven after someone
 (who shall remain nameless) suggested I try cdbakeoven after letting 
 him know of my issues with k3b crashing in the midst of a burn. (On
 that, I can simulate the writing and just use k3b for the conversion
 and do the actual writing with cdrecord).
 
 But cdbakeoven was worth a try so I grabbed it off of a cooker contrib
 mirror - at least I think it was one; the rpm hasn't been updated since
 last August.
 
 cdbakeoven-1.8.9-5mdk is the rpm I installed yesterday. It seems easy
 enough to operate, yet there must be something wrong in the setup -
 especially the programs it uses to do the conversion(s) from mp3 to 
 wave format suitable for audio CDs. I got a burn all right, but 
 I got a burn of only 1/4th or so of what I expected, and when I popped
 the CD into my CD player, I got white noise. Another coaster, I guess.
 
 Has anyone else noticed this? Are there settings I should pay attention
 to?


Why are you not sticking with Gcombust?  Is there something it can't
accomplish that you need done?

LX

-- 
°°°
Linux Mandrake 9.1  Kernel 2.4.21-0.13mdk
*Catch Star Trek Enterprise, Wednesdays on UPN*



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] ReiserFS , JFS or XFS

2003-08-14 Thread Lyvim Xaphir
On Mon, 2003-08-11 at 16:24, Bryan Whitehead wrote:
 Lawson, Jim wrote:
  Has anyone used these? What are you comments about these. ( Good, Bad)
 
 XFS has a dump utility... non of the other FS's do (JFS or Reiserfs).
 
 There is a dump for ext2/3 but you'll have to use snapshoting with LVM 
 or ELVM to keep dump from hanging (unless you want to umount the 
 filesystem before dumping...)
 
 If you care about real backups go with XFS. It's also (in my tests) 
 faster than the others...

Well, that makes three of us now that run numbers and are saying that
XFS is faster.  Bryan Whitehead, Civileme, and yours truly.

LX

-- 
°°°
Linux Mandrake 9.1  Kernel 2.4.21-0.13mdk
Filter That, Beach! --Lanman, MDK Newbie List



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


[expert] Oh, and BTW...you guys owe SCO $1399.00

2003-08-14 Thread Lyvim Xaphir
For the copy of Mandrake you now have.  Wait...check that: it's $1399.00
for every CPU that's running a copy of kernel 2.4 or above.

Who's ready to pay?

SCO ready to clean out Linux users for $1399 per CPU
By Ashlee Vance in Chicago
Posted: 05/08/2003 at 21:35 GM

http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/53/32187.html

---Small slice of the article -

Linux users face a serious question. Is $699 too much to pay for a good
bath? 

The $699 scrubbing fee is exactly how much SCO wants for one CPU's worth
of a Linux license, and that's just for the time being. Come October 15,
the single CPU fee jumps to a whopping $1,399. 

This is the latest word from SCO handed down by Mr. Clean himself - SCO
CEO Darl McBride, during a Tuesday conference call. SCO had been holding
out on exactly how much it planned to charge Linux users for their use
of what it claims is borrowed Unix code, but now all has been made clear
- crystal clear. .


LX



-- 
°°°
Linux Mandrake 9.1  Kernel 2.4.21-0.13mdk
Filter That, Beach! --Lanman, MDK Newbie List



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] SCO

2003-08-14 Thread Lyvim Xaphir
On Wed, 2003-08-06 at 00:14, Miark wrote:
 Red Hat has a million bucks or more to dump into this--Mandrake doesn't.
 I'm content to have Mandrake focus on it's own problems and let the
 big'uns duke it out. 
 
 Miark
 
What peeves me is that IBM bailed SUSE linux out of the hole with
millions of dollars, and here Mandrake sat needing only a measly million
or so, and got passed over.  Crazy.  Such a waste.

I think Mandrake is superior to SUSE linux, and IBM could have saved
alot of money by investing in them, plus got a better product to boot.

LX

-- 
°°°
Linux Mandrake 9.1  Kernel 2.4.21-0.13mdk
Filter That, Beach! --Lanman, MDK Newbie List



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] ReiserFS , JFS or XFS

2003-08-12 Thread Lyvim Xaphir
On Mon, 2003-08-11 at 10:26, Lawson, Jim wrote:
 Has anyone used these? What are you comments about these. ( Good, Bad)
 
 James S. Lawson
   (@ @)
 oOO--(_)--OOo-
 
 


I've been running performance comparisons between ext3, XFS, and
ReiserFS.  My numbers are showing that XFS is coming out on top out of
all three.

Civileme originally touted XFS as his favorite.  I find that I agree
with him.  One thing that pushed me in the direction of XFS was the
possible need for terabyte sized database files.  XFS allows file sizes
of this magnitude, and this is also very handy for multimedia work, such
as working with DVD and sound stuff.

I originally was going with ext3 because of it's reliability; however
now, since I have run XFS for nearly 8 months now, across three Mandrake
distro versions, I've decided to switch exclusively to XFS.  The reasons
for this include it's stability and virtual absence of problems here,
even when run under the beta releases.  I'm not saying that there won't
be any problems for anybody, but what I do believe is that because of
Mandrake's perseverance in supplying and maintaining the XFS stuff in
regard to the kernel that just about all of the problems have pretty
much been worked out.

Anyway, the bottom line is that I find it faster and more responsive,
and the boot times, load times (application and service) that I have
checked show XFS to be ahead of both Reiser and ext3.

I wish Civileme was here, he could certainly offer more commentary on
XFS.



LX

-- 
°°°
Linux Mandrake 9.1  Kernel 2.4.21-0.13mdk
Filter That, Beach! --Lanman, MDK Newbie List



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Oh, and BTW...you guys owe SCO $1399.00

2003-08-10 Thread Lyvim Xaphir
On Wed, 2003-08-06 at 04:36, James Sparenberg wrote:
 On Wed, 2003-08-06 at 00:24, Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
  For the copy of Mandrake you now have.  Wait...check that: it's $1399.00
  for every CPU that's running a copy of kernel 2.4 or above.
  
  Who's ready to pay?
  
  SCO ready to clean out Linux users for $1399 per CPU
  By Ashlee Vance in Chicago
  Posted: 05/08/2003 at 21:35 GM
  
  http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/53/32187.html
  
  ---Small slice of the article -
  
  Linux users face a serious question. Is $699 too much to pay for a good
  bath? 
  
  The $699 scrubbing fee is exactly how much SCO wants for one CPU's worth
  of a Linux license, and that's just for the time being. Come October 15,
  the single CPU fee jumps to a whopping $1,399. 
  
  This is the latest word from SCO handed down by Mr. Clean himself - SCO
  CEO Darl McBride, during a Tuesday conference call. SCO had been holding
  out on exactly how much it planned to charge Linux users for their use
  of what it claims is borrowed Unix code, but now all has been made clear
  - crystal clear. .
  
  
  LX
 
 
 Guess I'll have to run 2.6 then *grin*
 
 James
 


They've still got you covered, James.  = 2.4

You sent your check yet?

LX
-- 
°°°
Linux Mandrake 9.1  Kernel 2.4.21-0.13mdk
*Catch Star Trek Enterprise, Wednesdays on UPN*



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


RE: [expert] Oh, and BTW...you guys owe SCO $1399.00

2003-08-06 Thread Lyvim Xaphir
On Wed, 2003-08-06 at 14:01, Jonathan Shilling wrote:
 Andy Davidson wrote:
  On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 03:24:30AM -0400, Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
  For the copy of Mandrake you now have.  Wait...check that: it's
  $1399.00 for every CPU that's running a copy of kernel 2.4 or above.
  
  Let's not generate our own FUD.  The $1399 is for a server, not a
  desktop.  The fee for a single-user desktop is only $199.
  
  No, I'm not paying that, either.
  
  andy
 Actually, if I recall correctly SCO stated that it is $699, and no I am
 _NOT_ going to pay them. :P
 
 
 
 Jonathan G. Shilling
 Senior LAN Administrator

Hmmm.  Well, technically since I have a server and two workstations
running here now, that brings me up to $2797.00.  For my own part I'm
saving Lanman's sample response email from the newbie list in case they
try to extort any money from me.

As Dr Jung said, they can pry it from my cold dead fingers.  Other than
that and until then they can kiss my ass.


LX
-- 
°°°
Linux Mandrake 9.1  Kernel 2.4.21-0.13mdk
Filter That, Beach! --Lanman, MDK Newbie List



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


(OFF LIST)Re: [expert] Kernel Update - NVIDIA Driver Problem

2003-08-02 Thread Lyvim Xaphir
On Sat, 2003-08-02 at 13:14, Vincent Danen wrote:

 You had the binary driver for nvidia installed.  I did build a new one and
 it should be on Club (I didn't put it there, but asked someone else to).  I
 just assumed it would be there.  If it isn't, I can email the webmaster
 again and get him to put it up.
 
 I'm on holidays right now, still reading mail, but anything that requires
 work will have to wait till I get back.  =)
 
 What you can also try is to use the nv driver for X (I believe that's it).
 That's the non-binary/commercial version of the driver, and should work
 although you likely won't get 3D or acceleration.  Since none of that
 matters to me, and since I dislike the binary drivers, I use the nv driver
 instead of the one nvidia closed.

Maybe this is a stupid question.  But how did you manage to get a binary
rpm of Nvidia's drivers produced from one of their run files?  Or do
they provide resources for putting their drivers in rpm format?

Another question.  If you packaged the binary Nvida driver into rpm
format, what version is it compared to what's available on Nvidia's
site, and how much of a hassle is it to keep the rpm up to date on
Nvidia's latest driver release.

Reason I'm asking is that I get a funny feeling every time I run that
nvidia executable on my system.  Stuff goes into the lib directories,
and I'm painfully aware that the rpmdatabase knows nothing about it. 
Therefore *I* don't know what's going on either.  I don't really feel
comfortable with that.

But I run Transgaming WineX for alot of stuff, and I DO need the
hardware acceleration and 3D features.  Well, especially since I've got
a Hercules Prophet III ti500, and I kinda sorta want to take advantage
of it's features (that I painfully paid for) before it goes obsolete in
a few months.  You know what I mean? :/

So if you are repackaging the nvidia stuff, I'm very interested in your
work.

BTW, just to let you know...I downloaded the entire rpmhelp.net contents
and created a CD with the base/hdlist.cz and set it up as another
source.  It worked wonderfully with a urpmi install of qmail. :)

Take care,

Hal


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] time drift

2003-08-02 Thread Lyvim Xaphir
On Sat, 2003-08-02 at 13:37, David E Fox wrote:
 Hi
 
 On a previous message I noted my issue with kde's clock having the
 wrong timezone. Still haven't sorted that out. But I noticed today that
 the system's time was wrong - still the right timezone but about 20
 minutes off PDT using the 'popcorn' service (speaking clock). 
 
 I apparently sync to time.nrc.ca, that's the one I picked, but if
 it's the source of the bad time, maybe the time is different in
 Canada?
 
 Back when I installed I seem to recall there was a list of available
 time servers, but I haven't seen where this list is stored post-install.


Anne has already posted the url for the servers, but I've got a
suggestion for a daemon that corrects your system clock online and off.
It's called chrony --

http://chrony.sunsite.dk/

Chrony is different in that while it checks the ntp time servers and
does correct your time, it also keeps a database of all the time checks
that it does as well as the amount by which your RTC/system clock is
off.  The real value of chrony is when you are offline; because when
chrony cannot contact ntp servers it reverts to it's database of ntp
time checks and RTC/system clock error margins, and then makes
corrections on it's own.  In other words with chrony your system becomes
accurate wether it's on or offline.

This relieves your dependence on timeservers to a great degree.  You no
longer have to be in contact with an ntp server 24/7 in order to be
reasonably accurate, as your system now has the capability to be self
correcting of it's own errors based on a database of past RTC time
errors.  After a certain time of being online, the time/error database
becomes sufficiently large that an adequate degree of time accuracy
becomes prevalent during offline times.

If you've ever studied exactly how bad computer clocks can be, you can
understand how valuable a self correcting mechanism like chrony is. 
That's not all it does, however; there's quite a few other things that
it's capable of, including detailed reports on daily average time
errors, for instance. You can also peruse it's database as it
accumulates timeserver versus system clock error data.

LX
-- 
°°°
Linux Mandrake 9.1  Kernel 2.4.21-0.13mdk
*Catch Star Trek Enterprise, Wednesdays on UPN*



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] How to turn off Bootsplash mdkKDM?

2003-07-31 Thread Lyvim Xaphir
On Thu, 2003-07-31 at 02:53, James Sparenberg wrote:
 On Wed, 2003-07-30 at 22:55, Felix Miata wrote:
  David Guntner wrote:
   
   James Sparenberg grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
  
or in your lilo.conf  vga=[some number]  changed to vga=normal
   
   Ah!  Good catch. :-)  I was about to ask him what cross out?  Because I
   couldn't find anything on that menu to uncheck WRT bootsplash.  Once you've
   set vga=normal in lilo.conf and run lilo, those options completely drop out
   of the drakboot program.
  
  What happens to those who never run lilo? I always depend on Grub for
  boot. No need to run it after changing its boot config file.
 
 Felix .. sorry, not to prefer one over the other.  I just never use
 grub.  The only other boot loaders I've ever used come with FreeBSD, or
 in the early days of my Unix / Linux trials Loadlin.
 
 James 


Ahhh!  Another one.  I've stayed put with Lilo as well. ;)


--LX

-- 
°°°
Linux Mandrake 9.1  Kernel 2.4.21-0.13mdk
Filter That, Beach! --Lanman, MDK Newbie List



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Mandrake Update through MCC and new kernel

2003-07-28 Thread Lyvim Xaphir
On Mon, 2003-07-28 at 21:48, James Sparenberg wrote:
 On Mon, 2003-07-28 at 18:26, Avi Schwartz wrote:
  Mandrake should change their kernel installation instructions in the 
  latest Security Advisory since they say there:
  
  To upgrade automatically, use MandrakeUpdate.  If you want to upgrade 
  manually, download the updated package(s) from one of our FTP server 
  mirrors and upgrade with rpm -Fvh *.rpm.
  
  Avi
 
 Avi 
 
Not quite... if you do Fvh... things could get real spooky.  You
 never upgrade or freshen a kernel.. It always has to be installed (ivh )
 otherwise all of the proper scripts to bind it to your computer will not
 get run and the end result will be.. a bit bucket.
 
 James
 

I think I would have used the adjective foobarred.

BTW, I have it on good authority that urpmi can update the kernel files
now.

--LX
-- 
°°°
Linux Mandrake 9.1  Kernel 2.4.21-0.13mdk
Filter That, Beach! --Lanman, MDK Newbie List



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


[expert] Test

2003-07-28 Thread Lyvim Xaphir

-- 
°°°
Linux Mandrake 9.1  Kernel 2.4.21-0.13mdk
Filter That, Beach! --Lanman, MDK Newbie List



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] CPU temperature question

2003-07-18 Thread Lyvim Xaphir
On Fri, 2003-07-18 at 01:22, Jack Coates wrote:
 On Tue, 2003-07-15 at 12:11, Lyvim Xaphir wrote:

 You'll like this Lyvim...
 
 I've known for a while that my everything server cum router cum wife's
 workstation was overheating, but it's only been a major problem (e.g.
 interrupting task at hand) when she wants to play quake2. Last week I
 added a 95mm fan with a resistor on it, but didn't really look at the
 CPU because I have to pull the power supply to see it.
 
 So tonight we were playing some quake2 with a friend over the Internet,
 when her machine locked up a littler earlier than it normally would. No
 big deal, it started to reboot as usual, but then kernel panicked. So I
 gave it the three-finger salute, went to the BIOS CPU health page, and
 saw it ticking over from 98C to 100C -- yes friends, 212 degrees
 Fahrenheit or the boiling point of water :-)
 
 Needless to say I cracked it open and found that the CPU heatsink was
 blocked with cat hair and the cheap white thermal compound had burned
 away. In fact, that yellow pad on the bottom of my heat sink had also
 burned away. I scraped it all off and found a tube of Artic Silver II,
 took out the fan resistor and hooked a third fan up. I now have the 95mm
 in the front sucking in with no resistor (loud mofo) and two tiny
 fellers hooked to one of those auto-speed pyramid thingies -- one on the
 back of the case and one on the video card. That seems to be doing the
 job so far, and I plan to get that big fan onto the auto-speed thingie
 or a resistor because it is way loud.


Wow.  You are right...that is unbelievable.  What was that TV show that
was on one time?  Now THAT's INCREDIBLE!

Enjoyable story.  I'm glad you didn't fry the silicon.  It may be a loud
mofo right nowbut you're one LUCKY mofo. ;)

Keep up the good karma aura, whatever you are doing right...

LX

P.S.  Send some this way while your'e at it...

:)
-- 
°°°
Linux Mandrake 9.1  Kernel 2.4.21-0.13mdk
Filter That, Bitch! --Lanman, MDK Newbie List



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] NIC's

2003-07-17 Thread Lyvim Xaphir
On Wed, 2003-07-16 at 14:12, James Sparenberg wrote:

 For speed.  The pro100 edged out the 3c905 (especially when using
 multiple NICS to a single network as in for example a web server.) by
 about 2 or 3 percent.  For reliability.  I've yet to have either one
 fail (over the last 4 years.) so I don't have a curve on that.  In my
 old firewall some testing I did with them showed on a 100mb network the
 3com had a true 42mb throughput, the pro100 about 43-44mb and a linksys
 about 32mb.  One note, It also is affected by driver quality.  One
 advantage afforded winders.  The authors of the driver has access to
 data OSS authors often don't, but in the case of these cards I'd say
 it's pretty even.  (anyone need a collection of bad netgear and linksys
 nics?) 
 
 James
 

I assume since netgear wasn't mentioned that it isn't as hot a product
as many have been led to believe. (how did they rate?)  Did you test the
cards all in full duplex operation with a switch or was the throughput
analyzed in half duplex mode.  Which cards performed the best in full
duplex?


LX
-- 
°°°
Linux Mandrake 9.1  Kernel 2.4.21-0.13mdk
*Catch Star Trek Enterprise, Wednesdays on UPN*



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] CPU temperature question

2003-07-17 Thread Lyvim Xaphir
On Thu, 2003-07-17 at 01:07, James Sparenberg wrote:

  Really. Interesting. Must be one heck of a magnet to handle the torque and 
  thrust of the fan eh?
 
 Just a thought here.  But if you think about it torque and thrust for
 the spinning fan (assuming a constant speed) will be almost 0.  If of
 course it is properly balanced.  In such a case it will operate just
 like a gyro. (All the weight of the blades on the ends etc.)  As long as
 it is constantly in a single plane of operation torque and thrust are
 negligible.  Also like a gyro it would heavily resist any attempt to
 move it off of it's plane of operation. 
 
 James

Got some new news.  Looks like you were right James; on all counts. 
It's basically a little gyro that uses the weight at the edges of the
fan (magnets) to resist movement off it's plane of operation.  Also,
they do actually have small ball bearings at the center hub.  Although
the TMD fans got an excellent review and technical description in the
following URL:

http://www.dansdata.com/tmdfan.htm

, I'm still peeved that they used the term bearingless. (???)

LX
-- 
°°°
Linux Mandrake 9.1  Kernel 2.4.21-0.13mdk
Filter That, Bitch! --Lanman, MDK Newbie List



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] CPU temperature question

2003-07-17 Thread Lyvim Xaphir
On Wed, 2003-07-16 at 13:53, James Sparenberg wrote:

I think by bearingless they actually do mean sealed bearing.  It's
 more a case of marketing taking a technical term and misusing it to the
 point of extreme obfuscation of term (ie Trusted Computing by M$)
 rather than what it actually does mean.  But you are right the sealed
 bearing fans last seemingly  forever.  Don't know how long because the
 rest of the box gets so far out of date I never use the comp that long.
 (I've got one on a 233mhz pI that is 9 years old).
 
 James

But the problem is that they specifically describe the bearing as
magnetic tip driven.  In addition to that they also say
bearingless.  This to me is inescapable verbage.

LX
-- 
°°°
Linux Mandrake 9.1  Kernel 2.4.21-0.13mdk
*Catch Star Trek Enterprise, Wednesdays on UPN*



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] CPU temperature question

2003-07-17 Thread Lyvim Xaphir
On Thu, 2003-07-17 at 01:07, James Sparenberg wrote:

   This is not the same thing.  This is new bearingless technology.  It
   utilizes something called a magnetic tip.  My understanding is that the
   fan blade is suspended by a magnetic field.
  
  Really. Interesting. Must be one heck of a magnet to handle the torque and 
  thrust of the fan eh?
 
 Just a thought here.  But if you think about it torque and thrust for
 the spinning fan (assuming a constant speed) will be almost 0.  If of
 course it is properly balanced.  In such a case it will operate just
 like a gyro. (All the weight of the blades on the ends etc.)  As long as
 it is constantly in a single plane of operation torque and thrust are
 negligible.  Also like a gyro it would heavily resist any attempt to
 move it off of it's plane of operation. 
 
 James
   
I've got one now in my hand.  The magnets that actually turn the fan are
on the outside edge that joins all the blade tips together in a circle.
They don't ever actually touch anything. The center point seems to be
the magnetic tip.  But I can't confirm that without unscrewing stuff. 
I'm sorry, I really don't want to do that. :)

Anyway, the bearing type is specifically listed as being Magnetic Tip
Driven.  If it were anything else it would be listed as sealed,
ball, (both), or sleeve.  There's absolutely none of that.  Plus the
fan is advertised as bearingless.



LX
-- 
°°°
Linux Mandrake 9.1  Kernel 2.4.21-0.13mdk
*Catch Star Trek Enterprise, Wednesdays on UPN*



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] CPU temperature question

2003-07-17 Thread Lyvim Xaphir
On Thu, 2003-07-17 at 03:45, Lyvim Xaphir wrote:

 Got some new news.  Looks like you were right James; on all counts. 
 It's basically a little gyro that uses the weight at the edges of the
 fan (magnets) to resist movement off it's plane of operation.  Also,
 they do actually have small ball bearings at the center hub.  Although
 the TMD fans got an excellent review and technical description in the
 following URL:
 
 http://www.dansdata.com/tmdfan.htm
 
 , I'm still peeved that they used the term bearingless. (???)

Yet another update.  I found the fan manufacturer's site and they have
no mention of bearingless anywhere.

http://www.ystech.com.tw/Tmd/tmd-0.htm

The mention of bearingless comes in when you start hitting the sites
that are actually selling the Areoflow or it's fan technology, similar
to this one:

http://www.mlhsystems.com/momex/NavCode/Hardware.info/ID/2159

Or this review site:

http://www.burnoutpc.com/index.php?page=reviewsreview_id=150

Which lists the bearing type as Magnetic Tip Driving.  This is simply
incorrect.  Other sites with conventional fans list bearing types as
either sleeve or ball bearing.  That is how the Areoflow should be
listed; as ball bearing.

More pointedly; the Magnetic Tip Driving technology is nowhere near the
center ball bearing; it's outside the fan perimeter entirely.

Bottom line, it's not the manufacturer's fault.  The bearingless myth
started after they began selling; by the sellers.


LX
-- 
°°°
Linux Mandrake 9.1  Kernel 2.4.21-0.13mdk
*Catch Star Trek Enterprise, Wednesdays on UPN*



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] NIC's

2003-07-16 Thread Lyvim Xaphir
On Mon, 2003-07-14 at 03:07, James Sparenberg wrote:
 On Tue, 2003-07-15 at 09:45, Richard Bown wrote:
  Hi all
  I did send this in when the server was down so it looks like it got
  lost.
  
  My cable connection is not as good as it could be, so called out the
  cable guys and to my horror, his win98 laptop downloaded faster than
  this machine, My current NIC is a realtek 8139, and I always thought 

  a linux machine would floor a poxy winyuk machine. What NICs are known
  to work well , ie fast..
 
 In testing I've learned to love 3c905's and the Intel p100's ... 


Can you tell me which ones had the best performance out of all of them,
without compromising anything. ?

10/100 class, that is.

LX
-- 
°°°
Linux Mandrake 9.1  Kernel 2.4.21-0.13mdk
Filter That, Beotch! --Lanman, MDK Newbie List



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] CPU temperature question

2003-07-16 Thread Lyvim Xaphir
On Wed, 2003-07-16 at 13:45, James Sparenberg wrote:
 On Wed, 2003-07-16 at 06:24, Thomas K. Gamble wrote:

   HSF's that outperform the Areoflow don't do it by a significant
   margin and plus they weigh a ton cause usually they are solid copper.
That can possibly put a physical strain on the mobo if it's in a
   tower case.
  
  I've actually ordered a couple of these to try them out although I don't 
  know how much of an improvement they'll be over the Thermaltake 
  Volcanos I have installed.  Given that the computers are in safes, 
  noise is not an issue, at least as far as the computers are concerned.  
  Now the safes are a different story.  I have three safes and each has 
  two 10 inch exhaust fans.  The background noise level in the room is 
  about 62db.  Annoying but I'm told it's not a hazard.

Thomas,

Don't forget your Arctic Silver 3 thermal compound.  You need that.  It
has the best heat transfer rating of any of the others.

For thermal resistance test results on some Volcano 9 and 7+ vs the
VA4-C7040's, please see the following:

http://www6.tomshardware.com/cpu/20030113/cooler5-39.html#hot_or_cold_thermal_resistance_is_decisive

Yes, the Va4-C7040 beat those Volcano's in this roundup.  The noise
levels *could* be made to be comparable, but he had to reduce the rpm's
of the volcano's down to 1800 in order to achieve that.  Meanwhile the
VA4-C7040's were running at full speed for the noise level tests you
see.


 
 Thomas,
 
Not a hazard due to db level, but it can affect your hearing in that
 the the air in the room pulses rhythmically.  If you are an old fart
 like myself this can be more damaging than when you were 21 because your
 eardrums are stiffer than before.  For short times of exposure you are
 ok, but if you are going to spend a large amount of time in rooms like
 this I'd highly recommend the foam earplugs, or equivalent.   Those
 aren't phones you're hearing. *grin*
 
 James

James,

 Fascinating.  I didn't realize that.  I need to watch the noise levels
around here a little more carefully.

On a side note: While doing some overclocking tests I noticed that under
full CPU load the mobo sensor was reporting 59C.  This naturally
bothered me quite a bit.  I checked inside the case.  Guess what?  A
SCSI cable was hanging over the HSF with only about a quarter inch
clearance or so.  About half the fan was covered.  So I rerouted the
cable, and the temp dropped under full load a full 5C; down to 54C.

I think I'm going to refit the whole machine with round IDE and SCSI
cables.

--LX

P.S.  BTW, I'm still curious about your NIC testing. :)
-- 
°°°
Linux Mandrake 9.1  Kernel 2.4.21-0.13mdk
*Catch Star Trek Enterprise, Wednesdays on UPN*



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] CPU temperature question

2003-07-15 Thread Lyvim Xaphir
On Tue, 2003-07-15 at 14:11, Thomas K. Gamble wrote:

 
 I had a system that was experiencing periodic lockups recently.  Turns 
 out the cpu temps were creeping up to around 78C. Improving the case 
 cooling brought the temp down to around 63C under load.  Still not 
 ideal, but the system is in a safe and has limited cooling.  I may have 
 to try a different heatsink fan combo.  This is a Tyan dual cpu mb with 
 2100+MPs.  Obviously reliability fails well below 110C, at least for 
 this system.
 
 Anyone know which mbs have the core temp sensors?

Well, the core temp sensors are in the core, which is the XP chip
itself.  In other words it's an AMD cpu thing; which is the reason for
the increase in accuracy over the mobo sensors.

If you were at 78C you were at extreme risk of frying your CPU's.  In
fact it's possible that there might have been some damage done.

But you can chill those puppies and you might be able to get stability
under high load with no problem.  What I would do is install two Vantec
Areoflow heat sink fans (they have copper cores, surrounded by a block
of machined aluminum) after cleaning the chip surfaces carefully with a
q-tip soaked in odorless mineral spirits to get rid of the old thermal
compound.  Same for the HSF.

Get some Arctic Silver 3 thermal compound (the best thermal resistance
rating you can get) and use that to install your Areoflows (model number
VA4-C7040).  Arctic Silver 3 is pretty much the best thermal compound
around and as a result of it's superior thermal resistance it can get
your core down by as much as 7C.

The Areoflows have bearingless fans which are some of the quietest in
the industry, and ultimately reliable because they are, well,
bearingless.  It is possible to get a better thermal resistance with
another HSF, but not without going to a bearing based fan, and the HSF's
that outperform the Areoflow don't do it by a significant margin and
plus they weigh a ton cause usually they are solid copper.  That can
possibly put a physical strain on the mobo if it's in a tower case.

 -- 
 Thomas K. Gamble
 Los Alamos National Laboratory
 Advanced Diagnostics  Instrumentation (C-ADI)
 p:505-665-4323 f:505-665-4267
 MS-E543



LX
-- 
°°°
Linux Mandrake 9.1  Kernel 2.4.21-0.13mdk
Filter That, Beotch! --Lanman, MDK Newbie List



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] 2.4.21 athlon-xp optimized mm kernel

2003-07-11 Thread Lyvim Xaphir
On Fri, 2003-07-11 at 00:29, Brant Fitzsimmons wrote:


 Does the Duron use the same flags as the t-bird?
 
 
 -- 
 Brant Fitzsimmons
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one
 persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore, all
 progress depends on the unreasonable man.
 
   -George Bernard Shaw


Brant,

I feel fairly certain that it does indeed use the same flags as the
T-bird.  Anyone else please confirm or deny.


--LX

-- 
°°°
Linux Mandrake 9.1  Kernel 2.4.21-0.13mdk
*Catch Star Trek Enterprise, Wednesdays on UPN*



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] OT - quake3

2003-07-11 Thread Lyvim Xaphir
On Thu, 2003-07-10 at 14:45, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hey all,
 I've been REALLY busy the last few months and haven't had the chance to
 play my favorite game, q3a.  I just started it up last night and after
 finding that I had to install the latest point release, 1.32b, to make it
 work again - I did a few warm up games then jumped onto multiplayer -
 aaa!!!  Where did all the servers go???  PLEASE tell me it's something
 simple!!  Did everyone quit playing quake???  I don't think I could make
 it through life knowing that q3a is no longer out there!!  I guess I took
 it for granted, just thinking it would always be there for me, I should
 have paid more attention, I feel awful!!
 Ok, enough drama, does anyone have a suggestion?
 Thanks :)
 Mike
 

Not sure exactly what the problem might be here.  I know that there were
alot of Quake peeps that stayed on the older pointreleases because of
sound problems with the newer ones; in Linux, at least.  (When you are
on one pointrelease, you can't see servers that are on the other
pointreleases.)  On the other hand, my son and I had problems with NAT
in that you need one public IP address PER MACHINE in order for Quake to
work properly on all of them.  Difficulties with the NAT configuration
kept us from properly getting out; I remember we resolved it, but I
can't remember exactly what the problem was, and even after it was
fixed, only one of us could play at a time.  Come to think of it, I
think it was that the Quake ports were not properly open on the gateway.

Again, if there is nobody running a server on your particular patch,
then of course you won't see anything.  I doubt that's the case tho...it
just may be that the Quake ports are not being allowed thru your NAT or
firewall.

Let me know how it goes..

--LX

-- 
°°°
Linux Mandrake 9.1  Kernel 2.4.21-0.13mdk
*Catch Star Trek Enterprise, Wednesdays on UPN*



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] CPU temperature question

2003-07-11 Thread Lyvim Xaphir
On Fri, 2003-07-11 at 00:15, James Sparenberg wrote:
 On Thu, 2003-07-10 at 15:55, Vox wrote:

   The stock fan that comes with the Athlon is not the best deal in the
   world.  The real deal is a Vantec Areoflow VA4-C7040.  That's a
   fantastic piece of engineering, and it doesn't cost an arm and a
   leg.
  
I use a Volcano 6, IIRC (I didn't build this thing, a friend did...I
don't open computers...HW sucks :) And I think it's doing a very
good job, considering the fact that the room I'm in is at 42C at the
moment :)
  
  
   To see what is happening, download Prime95 (mprime2212.tar.gz) from
  
   http://www.mersenne.org/freesoft.htm
  
I'll check that out, thanks for the suggestion...as I said, HW is
not my stuff...one of my other geek friends deals with my HW, I deal
with his SW :)
  
Thanks for the bunch of tips...I'll do the SW side checks and I'll
pass the HW stuff to my friend...thanks bunches :)
  
Vox

You're welcome.  Prime95 is an overclocker's tool.  It will help when
you are attempting to get the CPU to maximum load.  I have found here by
experimentation that it is very hard for me to max the CPU out to the
highest temp by just doing different tasks in X, no matter it seems what
I do.  There's no escape from the Prime95 torture test, tho. ;)

 
 Vox,
   Last ditch if you get worried.  open the side and put a small desk fan
 right on it.  From the hardware standpoint.  make sure cables (like
 ribbon cables) are clear of the fan.  Also you might consider case fans
 in addition to the volcano fan.  (I love volcano myself.)
 
 James
 

I considered the Volcano 7 and the Volcano 9 in the following URL while
doing research on HSF's, before I purchased one, and although their
results were impressive the reason I went with the Areoflow was because
it beat those two, plus the majority of the others, both in thermal
resistance and noise rating.

http://www6.tomshardware.com/cpu/20030113/cooler5-39.html#hot_or_cold_thermal_resistance_is_decisive

Note that the Volcano 7 and 9 are newer models than what Vox presently
has.  

If the lm_sensors is picking up his temp from the mobo sensors, then
there may be as much as a 10 - 20C difference between the actual core
temp and what's being detected.  That means that a 90C processor failure
temp could be reached long before the mobo sensors get anywhere near
90C.  His ambient temperature is already high, cause of no air
conditioning.  So, without an HSF upgrade, the open case and fan are a
good suggestion.

--LX


-- 
°°°
Linux Mandrake 9.1  Kernel 2.4.21-0.13mdk
*Catch Star Trek Enterprise, Wednesdays on UPN*



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] CPU temperature question

2003-07-11 Thread Lyvim Xaphir
On Fri, 2003-07-11 at 00:55, Robert Crawford wrote:
 On Friday 11 July 2003 12:35 am, Vox wrote:
  On September 1993 plus 3599 days James Sparenberg wrote:
   Vox,
 Last ditch if you get worried.  open the side and put a small desk fan
   right on it.  From the hardware standpoint.  make sure cables (like
   ribbon cables) are clear of the fan.  Also you might consider case fans
   in addition to the volcano fan.  (I love volcano myself.)
 
I'm not really worried about the temp...having read the docs from
AMD, I won't worry till it hits 65C, which it has never done :) And
yes, I like the volcano...has worked well for me...and I do have a
case fan at the front and a small fan on the mboard itself...I've
been thinking about getting a second case fan for the back, but am
too damn lazy to go find one :)
 
Vox
 
 It's been my experience with numerous AMD cpus that anything over 45c. is 
 likely to start causing random misc. problems. I always start feeling 
 apprehensive when my temps go above 40c. Why AMD states up to 90c. is beyond 
 me. The one time I got above 50c. the system became unusable- random lockups, 
 shut-down problems, various hanging with programs, etc. Better cooling fixed 
 everything instantly, so it was obviously caused by high temps.
 
 wrc1944
 

This is very true.  It's also a fact that higher operating temperatures
cause AMD's to operate increasingly hotter as they get older and also
shorten the life of the CPU.  Once the CPU accumulates damage it cannot
be un-damaged.  Therefore I made sure that this new XP2100 I got the
other day had the best cooling possible, cause I want the processor in
mint condition on up to the day it goes on to greener pastures.

I also glance with great suspicion at the AMD failure temp.  I think
that it should be made clearer to users that this is a core temp
measurement, which is very different from a mobo sensor temp
measurement.  There can be 10 to 20 deg C difference between the two,
which means you can be frying your CPU and not even realize it.  I've
got an XP2100 and (it being new) it probably has a core temp diode
sensor.  But I know for a fact that my system is not taking advantage of
that, and that lm_sensors is reporting from the mobo sensor.  Therefore
to me it's reflexive it to calculate the error of margin in.  The small
investment in HSF research and hardware is well worth the peace of mind.

--LX
-- 
°°°
Linux Mandrake 9.1  Kernel 2.4.21-0.13mdk
*Catch Star Trek Enterprise, Wednesdays on UPN*



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] CPU temperature question

2003-07-10 Thread Lyvim Xaphir
On Thu, 2003-07-10 at 08:43, Jack Coates wrote:
 On Wed, 2003-07-09 at 05:12, Phil wrote:
  Hello All,
  
  After playing with Ksensors tonight I'm now wondering what the threshold 
  temperatures for the CPU and Mother board should be.
  
  I have an AMD XP2000+ CPU which is currently running at 60 degrees C while the 
  Mother Board temperature is 24 degrees C. I remember that these temperatures 
  were quite a bit higher during Summer.
 
 As everyone else has said, AMDs run very hot. As long as you're playing
 with lm_sensors, have a look at lmcgi :-)
 http://www.monkeynoodle.org/statistics for an example. The case fan says
 zero because I'm not using the three-pin motherboard connector right
 now. 

As you all can see, Jack's idle temp seems to be the low 40's, it was
42C whenever I checked it.  So he is exactly where he is supposed to be
tempwise.  60C is way too high.

--LX
-- 
°°°
Linux Mandrake 9.1  Kernel 2.4.21-0.13mdk
*Catch Star Trek Enterprise, Wednesdays on UPN*



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] CPU temperature question

2003-07-10 Thread Lyvim Xaphir
On Thu, 2003-07-10 at 10:19, Jack Coates wrote:
 Is it just me, or does 205 to 230 degrees Fahrenheit seem a bit
 excessive for the maximum temperature of a desktop? Yikes! I'm nervous
 enough about the operating temperature of 122 to 158 degrees Fahrenheit.
 

Overclockers usually don't like a CPU load temp to go over 60C.  If it's
operating at that or over during load then it's likely that the life of
the CPU is being shortened.

I've got a Vantec Areoflow VA4-C7040 HSF with a substandard heat
compound (got Arctic Silver 3 on order) and even with a crappy heat
grease and high core/IO voltages, the under-load temperature of the CPU
never exceeds 60C.  Remember, that's with overclocking.

A stock system should NEVER exceed or even approach 60C load.  The
target load temp for stock systems is around 50C.  As peace of mind is
pretty cheap these days in the form of better cooling, it's best to
remember that 50C reported from mobo sensors can be worse than 60C from
CPU core diode sensor.

For me, peace of mind is a Vantec Areoflow and Arctic Silver 3 thermal
compound.


--LX
-- 
°°°
Linux Mandrake 9.1  Kernel 2.4.21-0.13mdk
*Catch Star Trek Enterprise, Wednesdays on UPN*



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] heretic2 and sound in mandrake 9.1

2003-07-09 Thread Lyvim Xaphir
On Wed, 2003-07-09 at 10:58, Praedor Tempus wrote:
 It has been a while since I last played this game but
 now I have some family visiting and at least one of
 these visitors would like to pass some time playing
 it.  I installed it last night, got it working with my
 NVidia Ti4200 just fine, but I have no sound and it
 looks to be a libSDL issue of some sort.
   Has anyone managed to get this game working with
 sound in Mandrake 9.1 (or 9.0 which is likely similar
 enough for me to copy)?  I have all the libSDL rpms
 installed that came with 9.1 but perhaps one is
 missing that is needed by this game?
 
 praedor
 

It's been awhile since I've done this, but I remember having to do a
symlink(s) to the *real* SDL .so files(lib dir somewhere) *from* the
heretic2 directory.  I think that's finally what got it going.

I'm going to be reinstalling Heretic2 this weekend (my son's coming to
spend a week) so then I can have some hard specific information for you
then.

Ahhhyou also need to have the dynamic linked patch in place
instead of the static lined one.  I've got that patch archived if you
need it btw.  The best one I could find was from somewhere in Germany,
and after I applied that and made the symlink changes, stuff started
working.

This was under 8.2, but I believe we can get the same results under
LM91.

--LX


-- 
°°°
Linux Mandrake 9.1  Kernel 2.4.21-0.13mdk
*Catch Star Trek Enterprise, Wednesdays on UPN*



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] CDRW

2003-07-09 Thread Lyvim Xaphir
On Wed, 2003-07-09 at 13:50, Ronald J. Hall wrote:
 On Tuesday 08 July 2003 03:22 pm, Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
 
  There have been some Toshiba firmware updates addressing media support;
  you probably would be served best if you made sure the drive was flashed
  with the latest firmware.  I've got a link I'll send you that also
  includes region free firmware updates. ;)
 
 
  --LX
 
 Thanks Lyvim!

No problem, my friend. :)

--LX

-- 

Kernel 2.4.21-0.13mdk   Linux Mandrake 9.1
Enlightenment-0.16.5-12mdk  Evolution 1.2.4-1.1mdk
Linux User #268899 http://counter.li.org/



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] heretic2 and sound in mandrake 9.1

2003-07-09 Thread Lyvim Xaphir
On Wed, 2003-07-09 at 14:03, Ronald J. Hall wrote:
 On Wednesday 09 July 2003 01:19 pm, Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
 
  Ahhhyou also need to have the dynamic linked patch in place
  instead of the static lined one.  I've got that patch archived if you
  need it btw.  The best one I could find was from somewhere in Germany,
  and after I applied that and made the symlink changes, stuff started
  working.
 
 Yep, I had to use the patch as well. Lyvim is right - its the static versus 
 dynamic issue again. It does work under 9.1 though, for sure.
 
 Lyvim, I think you and I have worked thru this under a couple of releases now, 
 eh? 
 
 grin

It's a tradition. ;)

The tradition continues this weekend as I get a gaming workstation ready
for my son; we're probably going to do some Baldur's Gate 2, Diablo 2:
Throne of Bhaal, and Battlefield 1942; all under Transgaming Winex3.

Then we'll probably do Heretic 2, Quake 3, and Neverwinter Nights
native.  Woo hoo! :)

--LX

-- 
°°°
Linux Mandrake 9.1  Kernel 2.4.21-0.13mdk
*Catch Star Trek Enterprise, Wednesdays on UPN*



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] cdrw

2003-07-09 Thread Lyvim Xaphir
On Wed, 2003-07-09 at 23:48, dfox wrote:
 Somebody scribbled about re: [expert] cdrw
 ok
 
 i bit the bullet. Thanks to lyvim and other people's comments, i am
  going with a 1312 combo dvd/cdrw, from toshiba. i ordered it from micro
  pro and hope it arrives soon. i'll update folks when i get it.
 
 Update: boo hoo.
 
 I am running into a big catch-22 with respect to my debit card -- the
 bank can't add the shipping address and i live in an apt so i can't have 
 the package sitting at my doorstep when I come home at 7pm, as it will 
 probably be stolen. Micro pro flatly refused to ship to my work address.

Hang on, I'm finding you something...


--LX
-- 

Kernel 2.4.21-0.13mdk   Linux Mandrake 9.1
Enlightenment-0.16.5-12mdk  Evolution 1.2.4-1.1mdk
Linux User #268899 http://counter.li.org/



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Partition resize...

2003-07-08 Thread Lyvim Xaphir
On Tue, 2003-07-08 at 01:34, John McQuillen wrote:
 On Sun, 2003-07-06 at 22:18, John McQuillen wrote:
  Hi everyone,
  
  I have just moved my Mandrake 9.1 installation to a larger hard drive. I
  created partitions on the new drive with larger sizes to fill the new
  drive, then cloned the partitions from the old drive one at a time with
  Norton Ghost. After recreating the boot loader from the rescue disk, my
  system has booted and everything works A-OK.
  The only problem is that although Diskdrake shows the new partitions at
  the new sizes, df still reports the old sizes and free space. It appears
  that the file systems have not grown to fit the new partitions. Is there
  anything that I can do to fix this, or do I have to start again?
  
 Ok, since no-one here seems to know the answer to this, I posted to
 another forum (SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group) and got the answer which
 was to use resize_reiserfs (in my case) to resize the file system to the
 partition size.
 
 I had to boot to the rescue disk after copying resize_reiserfs to a
 floppy, as I discovered it is not on the rescue disk :( and run
 resize_reiserfs /dev/hdax for each of the partitions [1,6,7,8] that
 required resizing.
 
 You learn something new every day! :)
 
 Cheers,
 
 John...
 

John, it seems that you were the only one qualified enough to answer
your own question. :D

--LX

-- 
°°°
Linux Mandrake 9.1  Kernel 2.4.21-0.13mdk
*Catch Star Trek Enterprise, Wednesdays on UPN*



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] CDRW

2003-07-08 Thread Lyvim Xaphir
On Tue, 2003-07-08 at 15:03, Ronald J. Hall wrote:
 On Tuesday 08 July 2003 10:09 am, Tom Brinkman wrote:
 
 A 700 mb CDr has two sizes. 80 minutes, and 700mb.  Only time
  minutes is important is audio images. I often burn way over 800
  mb's of wav's to a CDr, but the time needs to be just under 80
  minutes of playing time to make the CDr stable on cheap junk CD
  players. Movies OTOH don't go by minutes, they need to fit 'data
  wise' in MB's on a CDr. Guess I'll just keep re-encoding the 'too
  big' ones ;)
 
 Talked to him. :-)
 
 He said they were 700s jammed full. Guess thats why my fairly new Toshiba DVD 
 drive would not read them, but my Plextor CDRW would.

There have been some Toshiba firmware updates addressing media support;
you probably would be served best if you made sure the drive was flashed
with the latest firmware.  I've got a link I'll send you that also
includes region free firmware updates. ;)


--LX

-- 
°°°
Linux Mandrake 9.1  Kernel 2.4.21-0.13mdk
*Catch Star Trek Enterprise, Wednesdays on UPN*



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] 2.4.21 athlon-xp optimized mm kernel

2003-07-08 Thread Lyvim Xaphir

What kind of speed difference are you seeing between the xp-optimization
and the stock kernel?


On Wed, 2003-07-09 at 01:36, Robert Crawford wrote:
 For those interested, I recompiled the 2.4.21-0.16mm-mdk kernel with pretty 
 aggresive athlon-xp optflags, and it works fine. These flags also work on 
 other kernels I have tried. The trick in making them take when compiling 
 kernels is putting them in the linux-2.4.21-0.16mm-mdk/arch/i386/Makefile, in 
 the following manner.
 
 First, I installed the MDK multimedia kernel  kernel-source rpms in the usual 
 manner. Then I copied the resulting source directory placed in /usr/src to my 
 kernels directory in ~/home. 
 
 Then copy the .config file to another location, go to a console, cd to 
 linux-2.4.21-0.16mm-mdk and do make mrproper. Then go into the above mentioned 
 Makefile, and comment out the current MK7 flags, and add the new flags 
 stanza, like shown below.

--LX

-- 
°°°
Linux Mandrake 9.1  Kernel 2.4.21-0.13mdk
*Catch Star Trek Enterprise, Wednesdays on UPN*



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Another Windoze feature in 9.1: kernel freezesroutinely

2003-07-07 Thread Lyvim Xaphir
On Sun, 2003-07-06 at 18:01, James Sparenberg wrote:
 On Sun, 2003-07-06 at 07:46, Peter Møller Neergaard wrote:
  I have now been running Mandrake 9.1 with the 2.4.21-0.18mdk kernel
  for about 3 weeks.  At this point it is starting to be annoying that
  this kernel locks up more often than even Micro$oft Windoze.
  
  The lock up will happen anything from 5 minutes to 10 hours of boot.
  It must be the kernel locking up since there is no response to the
  SysRq+Alt+... keys.
  
  This happens routinely, but irregular, so I have no idea how to track
  it.  I tried maximizing the information to syslog by choosing
  
*.*   /var/log/syslog
  
  in /etc/syslog.conf.  A typical entry looks like this:
  
  Jul  6 14:42:18 pan spamd[5914]: identified spam (9.3/5.0) for turtle:501 in 
  0.4 seconds, 3321 bytes. 
  Jul  6 14:45:00 pan CROND[5928]: (turtle) CMD (/usr/sbin/anacron -t 
  $HOME/bin/shell/cron/anacrontab) 
  Jul  6 14:45:00 pan anacron[5929]: Anacron 2.3 started on 2003-07-06
  Jul  6 14:45:00 pan anacron[5929]: Normal exit (0 jobs run)
  Jul  6 14:47:12 pan syslogd 1.4.1: restart.
  Jul  6 14:47:12 pan /etc/hotplug/net.agent: invoke ifplugd eth1
  Jul  6 14:47:12 pan ifplugd[1526]: Using interface eth1/00:02:2D:40:D0:92
  Jul  6 14:47:12 pan ifplugd[1526]: ETHTOOL_GLINK failed: Operation not 
  supported
  
  which means that I have booted around 14:46:45.  Thus there does not
  appear to be any programs running just before the lock up.
  
  So at this point I would like suggestions:
  - how can I get more debug information from the kernel
  - should I change to a different kernel, e.g., vanilla 2.4.21.  Or
should I consider one of the patched ones.
  
  Thanks
  
  /Peter
 
 Couple of questions to get the ball rolling.  One Have you run memtest
 on your RAM?  I've had problems like this before and what the cause was,
 was a bad ramchip but high enough up that normal operation didn't see it
 but when it came to a higher ram usage (like say logrotate) it would
 lock the box tighter than a republicans hand around someone else's
 penny.  This would be my first suspect.  Second.  Did it do this under
 the 13mdk version of the kernel (the one that comes with 9.1) Third what
 version of the kernel do you use.  SMP Enterprise etc. 
 
 James
 

Let me help a little by rolling the ball further down the sidewalk.  He
should go to 

http://www.mersenne.org/prime.htm

And download the linux version of Prime95.  Then run the stress test.
This will test the cpu very extensively while using all available ram. 
If it passes Prime95 overnight then he's got a good machine.  If it
fails then he's got hardware problems somewhere.

HTH,

LX

P.S.  And it's a Democrat's hand around someone elses penny (aka
taxes).  :D  The Reps have the vise grip on their own pennies.


-- 
°°°
Linux Mandrake 9.1  Kernel 2.4.21-0.13mdk
*Catch Star Trek Enterprise, Wednesdays on UPN*



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] CDRW

2003-07-07 Thread Lyvim Xaphir
Remember.  The vendor can report the correct write modes all he wants;
but there is also the small matter of correct EFM encoding.  That means
actually testing the drive to see if the drive can reproduce exotic
conditions like weak sectors.  That in turn means that somebody needs to
have actually tried to produce backup copies of exotic cd's in an
attempt to create true 1 to 1 copies.and then reported their
results.  Like the results at the CloneCD hardware database, for
instance.

For an idea of what true quality drives are capable of and what they are
up against, please check out the following:

http://www6.tomshardware.com/storage/20021213/lg-13.html

Not having perfect EFM encoding is the same thing as not having the
correct raw hardware modes at all.  For this info we need somebody's
test results.


On Mon, 2003-07-07 at 03:25, KevinO wrote:
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1
 
 charlie wrote:
  On Sun, 6 Jul 2003 10:56 pm, Tom Brinkman had this to contribute :-
 
  Could a few of y'all with Lite-On's post the results of
 'cdrecord --checkdrive dev=0,0,0'   Just the ID/Rev, and the last
 several lines are relevant.
 
 Here is the output from a couple of the Yamaha's here. Interesting...
 
 Cdrecord 1.11a31 (i586-mandrake-linux-gnu) Copyright (C) 1995-2002 Jörg Schilling
 scsidev: '0,2,0'
 scsibus: 0 target: 2 lun: 0
 Linux sg driver version: 3.1.24
 Using libscg version 'schily-0.6'
 Device type: Removable CD-ROM
 Version: 2
 Response Format: 2
 Capabilities   : SYNC
 Vendor_info: 'YAMAHA  '
 Identifikation : 'CRW2100E'
 Revision   : '1.0J'
 Device seems to be: Generic mmc CD-RW.
 Using generic SCSI-3/mmc CD-R driver (mmc_cdr).
 Driver flags   : SWABAUDIO
 Supported modes: TAO PACKET SAO SAO/R96P SAO/R96R RAW/R96R
 
 Cdrecord 2.0 (i586-mandrake-linux-gnu) Copyright (C) 1995-2002 Jörg Schilling
 scsidev: '0,0,0'
 scsibus: 0 target: 0 lun: 0
 Linux sg driver version: 3.1.24
 Using libscg version 'schily-0.7'
 Device type: Removable CD-ROM
 Version: 2
 Response Format: 2
 Capabilities   : SYNC
 Vendor_info: 'YAMAHA  '
 Identifikation : 'CRW3200E'
 Revision   : '1.0d'
 Device seems to be: Generic mmc CD-RW.
 Using generic SCSI-3/mmc CD-R driver (mmc_cdr).
 Driver flags   : MMC-3 SWABAUDIO BURNFREE AUDIOMASTER FORCESPEED
 Supported modes: TAO PACKET SAO SAO/R96P SAO/R96R RAW/R96R
 
 - --
 KevinO

--LX

-- 
°°°
Linux Mandrake 9.1  Kernel 2.4.21-0.13mdk
*Catch Star Trek Enterprise, Wednesdays on UPN*



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] CDRW

2003-07-07 Thread Lyvim Xaphir
On Mon, 2003-07-07 at 00:27, Ronald J. Hall wrote:
 On Sunday 06 July 2003 04:52 pm, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
 
  It's not so much the difference between the atapi and scsi drives,
  it's the data bus. Copying a CD on the fly is a much safer and faster
  thing using scsi.
 
  wobo
 
 Agreed. Less system resource/cpu time, responsiveness, etc, etc.
 
 Its more like set it and forget it (to paraphrase a really annoying 
 infocommercial!) :-)

I can always tell a student/advocate of ESR when I see one. ;D

--LX

P.S.  Cause ESR is a religious SCSI devotee.g


-- 
°°°
Linux Mandrake 9.1  Kernel 2.4.21-0.13mdk
*Catch Star Trek Enterprise, Wednesdays on UPN*



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] CDRW

2003-07-07 Thread Lyvim Xaphir
On Mon, 2003-07-07 at 11:27, Tom Brinkman wrote:

  It's an IDE burner, not SCSI. I'm not interested in burnin at 
 over 8x. Most of the time I burn at 4x.  Other than the quality 
 drives (Plextor and Yamaha), I just thought it might be a good idea 
 to investigate the cheap ones like Lite-On.

Times have changed.  Plextor and Yamaha are no longer what they used to
be in the days before computer users became technically savvy about
cdrom technology.  Plextor for instance now has an abysmal record with
regard to EFM encoding. There are fully 20 drives tested in the
following URL, and only one of them has correct EFM encoding.  That
drive was released *this* year; go figure.  SEE:

http://www.elby.ch/en/products/clone_cd/writers/p.html#plextor

Yamaha is not really any better, in fact they are worse.  Out of 28
tested drive models, NONE of them has correct EFM encoding!!  SEE:

http://www.elby.ch/en/products/clone_cd/writers/y.html#yamaha

This is what happens when people are using word of mouth to buy drives
instead of performance oriented test results from real world
applications.  The vendors can rest on their laurels and push an
inferior product on an unsuspecting public for as long as they are
allowed.  Plextor has started reacting to the Liteon phenomenon as of
this year by finally putting out a drive that encodes completely right.

Now as long as you are doing elementary stuff, like burning ISO's from
the image, or copying non-copy-protected audio or software cd's, you'll
never know that the drive isn't all there.  In that case it's fine to
own an inferior burner.  It's only when you are doing college level
stuff like making backup copies of copy protected audio or software cd's
that you will really see the problems or attributes of a drive.  That's
why I keep posting these links; they represent information from test
results.  That's the starting point; the test results.

All clearly explains the Liteon phenomenon.  Why exactly are they so
popular?  Well, the answer is very simple.  Liteon drives, almost all of
them without exception, are fully capable of giving you true 1 to 1
copies of copy protected cd's.  Why?  Because they have BOTH the
hardware modes needed *and* correct EFM encoding.  Look at Liteon's
track record and you will see what I mean:

http://www.elby.ch/en/products/clone_cd/writers/l.html#liteon

Out of 12 drives tested, only three are questionable.  By test results,
not word of mouth.  This is exactly why Liteon drives are popular; quite
simply, they do the job that they are supposed to do under demanding
circumstances.  So the hacker guys that can get the jobs done under the
demanding circumstances already know everything I've posted here because
they are cdrw hackers; as such their opinions are respected and they are
the ones recommending the drives to others trying to do the same thing.
Other people like me, for instance. The push for all this recent
popularity is the fact that the Liteon drives get the job done after UPS
delivers them.


I personally chose Toshiba, because I feel that Tosh drives offer more
quality of hardware than the others, (for slightly more money) plus
having immaculate hardware specs.  This is all based on prior personal
experience.

Liteon succeeds mainly because young cdrw hackers can afford them (they
are cheap) and they almost always get the job done.

 Few things I need to ask, are the Lite-On's made by Lite-On, or are
  they rebadged from other manufacturers? 

Liteon is it's own manufacturer to the best of my knowledge.  There are
others relabeling the Liteon brand, like Buslink, and they sell them at
a lower price.  So if you see any Buslink brand burners in Best Buy or
elsewhere, jump on them and ask the guys there if it registers as a
Liteon model number in system information when it is installed.  A
relabeled Liteon drive will always display it's true Liteon model number
when installed in the system.

We bought a Buslink burner from Best Buy as a birthday present for a
hacker bud not too long ago, and I went to Liteon's firmware page,
downloaded their latest firmware, and flashed the drive (under DOS)
before I giftwrapped it and sent it on.

We paid 25 bucks for the drive after rebate.It was actually a relabeled
Liteon LTR-32123S.

 Can the firmware be flashed from DOS

Yep
 , and are updates available (or have been)?

Yep

   I went to their site to look for myself, but got an 'under construction'
  message.

Please check the following URL:

http://www.liteontc.com.tw/

HTH,

--LX


-- 
°°°
Linux Mandrake 9.1  Kernel 2.4.21-0.13mdk
*Catch Star Trek Enterprise, Wednesdays on UPN*



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] GPG and signing rpms.

2003-07-06 Thread Lyvim Xaphir
On Mon, 2003-07-07 at 00:38, James Sparenberg wrote:
 Ok,
 
   Went to this page.  
 
 http://www.mandrakelinux.com/en/cookerdevel.php3
 
 following the instructions I created the .rpmmacros file edited it as it
 outlined.  
 
 then I did 
 
 gpg --gen-key  filled in the blanks ... generated a key.
 
 now when I do (as the same user) rpm --sign --clean -ba somerpm.spec it
 asks for the passphrase... I enter the same one I did during the key-gen
 phase.. and I get Pass phrase check failed Anyone have a clue as to
 what I did wrong?
 
 James
 

No, but if we can attract Vincent Danen's attention I'm sure he can put
you on the right track asap. :)

--LX

-- 

Kernel 2.4.21-0.13mdk   Linux Mandrake 9.1
Enlightenment-0.16.5-12mdk  Evolution 1.2.4-1.1mdk
Linux User #268899 http://counter.li.org/



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] CD Burner

2003-07-06 Thread Lyvim Xaphir
On Sun, 2003-07-06 at 23:53, Joseph Loo wrote:
 I tried looking around for some information on burning CD's. I have a 
 Plextor 12/10/32 scsi on a ultrawide scsi card. When ever I try to burn 
 a cd on the burenr, I can only get reliable burns if the write speed is 
 set as 3x on gnome toaster. If I try to do anything faster than that 4, 
 6, etc. the system loks like it it burning the CD correctly. If I try to 
 read it, the system does not recognize it as a valid cd. I am using the 
 standard defaults with gnome-toaster except for the speed.
 
 Also how do you make a copy of a cd with gnome toaster?

Is this a Plextor Model Number PX-W1210S ?

--LX

-- 

Kernel 2.4.21-0.13mdk   Linux Mandrake 9.1
Enlightenment-0.16.5-12mdk  Evolution 1.2.4-1.1mdk
Linux User #268899 http://counter.li.org/



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] CDRW

2003-07-05 Thread Lyvim Xaphir
On Sat, 2003-07-05 at 13:31, dfox wrote:
 Somebody scribbled about [expert] CDRW
 Hi all,
 after compiling K3b 0.9pre 2 after reinstalling KDE, I can now burn
 audio CD's on my second somewhat older CDRW.and using Gnome as the WM !
 
 I'm not sure (since I don't have a cdrw) if there really is a difference 
 in the model which would prevent k3b from doing what you want. But
 while we're on the subject, I'm in the market for a burner. It's about 
 time ;).
 
 Is it pretty much a plug-n-play situation these days? I'm likely going 
 atapi, and have a spare connnector (/dev/hdd). I've seen combo dvd 
 readers/cd rws. are these supported? There a several out there that are 
 'bare bones' it seems - prices under $50. 

Dfox,

Be real careful what you get here.  There are nice combos out there, but
when I was looking the good ones were hard to find.  The real pick for
me was a drive that would be able to do backup copies of copy protected
games or software.  If you can get a drive that does that then you've 
got a high quality drive.  Liteon has a good track record for that, or
Toshiba.  I ended up getting a Toshiba SD-R1202 DVD-R CDRW and it's been
flawless for doing very demanding stuff.  Stuff like SecureRom

The definitive place to look for the best cdrw's is the CloneCD site. 
There they have a bunch of drives already tested by the cdrw hackers, so
you can look through it all and pick what you want based on hard
performance rather than heresay.

For example consider the data that I researched before I bought my
drive.

http://www.elby.ch/en/products/clone_cd/writers/t.html#toshiba

At the left of this page you will see indices's for just about all of
the DVD or cdrw makers.  Check out the Toshiba SD-R1202, you see several
things.  They are all vital.

1. Best Write Mode --  RAW-DAO 96

2. Best Read Mode  --  RAW+96

3. Best Audio Read Mode -- RAW+96

4. Buffer-Underrun Technology  --  Two Sheeps

5. Correct EFM- Encoding  --  Two Sheeps

Two sheeps is the highest rating for a characteristic.  The read and
write modes you see above are the best ones available; not all drives
offer these modes, in fact the majority of the drives out there will not
give you this level of flexibility.  The bottom of the URL page is an
interesting section, the legend, and here are a few tidbits:

Best Write Mode

RAW-DAO 96 = 2352 bytes RAW Data + 96 Bytes P-W Subchannel Data. This is
the best mode for CloneCD. It allows writing of all subchannel
information, including Digital Signatures, CD-Text, ISRC, Catalog
Numbers, CD+G, CD+MIDI, Gaps, Indices and Crazy TOCs.
RAW-DAO 94 = 2352 bytes RAW Data + 94 Bytes P-W Subchannel Data. Same as
RAW-DAO 96, but 2-Bytes CRC of the Q Subchannel are generated by the
writer.
RAW-DAO 16 = 2352 bytes RAW Data + 16 Bytes P-Q Subchannel Data. This is
the second best mode for CloneCD. It allows writing of most subchannel
information, including most Digital Signatures, ISRC, Catalog Numbers,
Gaps, Indices and Crazy TOCs. 2-Bytes CRC of the Q Subchannel are
generated by the writer.
RAW-SAO = 2352 bytes RAW Data. This is the third best mode for CloneCD.
Feature support is drive dependend. ISRC, Catalog Numbers and Indices
can be written. Usually CD-Text, CD+G and CD+MIDI can be written as
well. Crazy TOCs and Digital Signatures can't be written in this mode.
SAO = 2352 bytes error corrected Data. This is the worst mode for
CloneCD. Writing of ISRC, Catalog Numbers, Indices and usually CD- Text
is supported.
- = Writing to this drive is not supported. CloneCD will not recognize
the drive as a CD-Recorder.


Correct EFM-Encoding

Two Sheeps = Drive writes regular bit patterns correctly.
One Sheep  = Drive writes regular bit patterns almost correctly.
Gray Sheep = Drive does not write regular bit patterns correctly or has
not yet been tested. Use Emulate weak sectors.

Best Data-Read Mode

RAW+96 = 2352 bytes RAW Data + 96 Bytes P-W Subchannel Data. This is the
best mode for CloneCD. Reads all subchannel information like ISRC,
Catalog Numbers, CD+G, CD+MIDI, Gaps, Indices, Digital Signatures.
RAW+16 = 2352 bytes RAW Data + 16 Bytes P-Q Subchannel Data. This is the
second best mode for CloneCD. Reads most subchannel information like
Gaps, Indices and most Digital Signatures.
RAW = 2352 bytes RAW Data. No Subchannel Data can be read.
- = Reading from this drive is not supported.

Best Audio-Read Mode

RAW+96 = 2352 bytes RAW Data + 96 Bytes P-W Subchannel Data. This is the
best mode for CloneCD. Reads all subchannel information like ISRC,
Catalog Numbers, CD+G, CD+MIDI, Gaps, Indices, Digital Signatures.
RAW+16 = 2352 bytes RAW Data + 16 Bytes P-Q Subchannel Data. This is the
second best mode for CloneCD. Reads most subchannel information like
Gaps, Indices and most Digital Signatures.
RAW = 2352 bytes RAW Data. No Subchannel Data can be read.
- = Reading from this drive is not supported.





The verbage above reads best modes for CloneCD; in actuality these
hardware modes (that the Toshiba SD-R1202 

[expert] CPU Temperature monitor

2003-07-05 Thread Lyvim Xaphir


I need a utility that will tell me what is going on with the cpu
temperature.  Haven't been able to locate one.  Any of you guys out
there got any suggestions?


--LX
-- 

Kernel 2.4.21-0.13mdk   Linux Mandrake 9.1
Enlightenment-0.16.5-12mdk  Evolution 1.2.4-1.1mdk
Linux User #268899 http://counter.li.org/



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] CPU Temperature monitor

2003-07-05 Thread Lyvim Xaphir
On Sat, 2003-07-05 at 19:40, KevinO wrote:
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1
 
 Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
 
  I need a utility that will tell me what is going on with the cpu
  temperature.  Haven't been able to locate one.  Any of you guys out
  there got any suggestions?
 
 urpmi lm_sensors
 
 It requires a bit of configuration and a 'front end' (there are many to choose
 from) but it works quite nicely.
 
 Do a google search for lm_sensors
 - --
 KevinO
 


THANK YOU!!  I owe you big time Kev!

--LX

-- 

Kernel 2.4.21-0.13mdk   Linux Mandrake 9.1
Enlightenment-0.16.5-12mdk  Evolution 1.2.4-1.1mdk
Linux User #268899 http://counter.li.org/



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Interview: Gaël Duval on finances

2003-07-04 Thread Lyvim Xaphir
On Wed, 2003-07-02 at 15:32, James Sparenberg wrote:
 On Wed, 2003-07-02 at 09:48, Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
  Source URL:
  http://mozillaquest.com/Linux_News03/MandrakeClustering_Story01.html
  
  Excerpt:
  
  Mandrake's Good Financial News
  

  
  MozillaQuest Magazine: Anything else within that which you call the
  business side?
  
  Gal Duval: Improving the Club, improving MandrakeStore: these things
  also help us to make more business everyday.
 
 Now the question.  Any chance this will include a way to submit bugs for
 the release version!  (and no I won't hold my breath waiting.)
 
 James
 

Heh. :D  It is good that we have Vincent.  If not for his involvement I
don't know where we would be at.  He's like a one man development team. 
Like, hell...he IS a one man development team. :)

--LX
-- 

Kernel 2.4.21-0.13mdk   Linux Mandrake 9.1
Enlightenment-0.16.5-12mdk  Evolution 1.2.4-1.1mdk
Linux User #268899 http://counter.li.org/



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Interview: Gaël Duval on finances

2003-07-03 Thread Lyvim Xaphir


--- Vincent Danen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Wed Jul 02, 2003 at 12:32:07PM -0700, James Sparenberg wrote:

  Now the question.  Any chance this will include a way to
  submit bugs for the release version!  (and no I won't hold
  my breath waiting.)
 
 Without holding your breath, or my own, I've setup a Proof of
 Concept for release bug tracking using Anthill and, to my
 utter annoyance, there has been very little response from
 those I set it up for.  I'm thinking that at least one of
 them is on holidays, so it may be some time but trust me,
 I am just as eager as all of you to have this in place for
 9.2.
 

Well, heck, this is excellent news !!  Thanks for taking your time to set
this up, Vincent.  This addresses a mount everest pile of concerns from
longtime users in the form of a real and tangible solution to the
problem.

This framework will become very important as Mandrake makes inroads to
desktop markets like HP and others.  As the new users flood in, then they
can be introduced to the automated production bug Anthill system as a way
to report problems.  This should bolster the stability and strength of
the OS as it continues to get a wider base of reporting and feedback.

Of course this means that your system should be adopted yesterday, since
both James and I could probably have used it already. ;)  Not to mention
a slew of other peeps.  So we need to push this.

I'm wondering, does this version of Anthill have incorporated into it the
other changes from the production use of it?

--LX

__
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] kernel 2.4.21-0.18mdk xconfig - fixed

2003-07-03 Thread Lyvim Xaphir
On Thu, 2003-07-03 at 12:52, Vincent Danen wrote:
 On Thu Jul 03, 2003 at 09:39:09AM -0500, Praedor Atrebates wrote:
 
  I accidentally deleted the message so I had to do something.
 
 heheh... ok.  Incidentally, the mailing list archives are great sources of
 information as well... =)
 
 But I think your creativity is great... =)

LOL. :)

Ya gotta love them archives. g

--LX

-- 

Kernel 2.4.21-0.13mdk   Linux Mandrake 9.1
Enlightenment-0.16.5-12mdk  Evolution 1.2.4-1.1mdk
Linux User #268899 http://counter.li.org/



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


[expert] Interview: Gaël Duval on finances

2003-07-02 Thread Lyvim Xaphir

Source URL:
http://mozillaquest.com/Linux_News03/MandrakeClustering_Story01.html

Excerpt:

Mandrake's Good Financial News

After MandrakeSoft filed the equivalent of a U.S. Chapter 11 bankruptcy,
it set about a restructuring designed to make MandrakeSoft a financially
viable operation. We asked Gaël Duval about that in our e-mail
discussions about the MandrakeClustering announcement.

MozillaQuest Magazine: How are you coming along with finances and the
bankruptcy?

Gaël Duval: No big news, but we have nearly finished our internal
restructuring, with a strong commitment to doing business.

Gaël Duval: We should be out of the chapter-11 protection in about 8
months (it takes time!).

MozillaQuest Magazine: I think lots of people will be glad to hear that
you are coming along with the finances and bankruptcy.

Gaël Duval: The situation is really better than before for two reasons:
1) MandrakeSoft reorganization is nearly finished and 2) we have focused
much on the business side.

MozillaQuest Magazine: This is good to hear also.

MozillaQuest Magazine: By the business side, is that the Mandrake
Corporate server and now the MandrakeClustering?

Gaël Duval: They are part of our plans to extend the business!

MozillaQuest Magazine: Is the book (The Definitive Guide to Using
Mandrake Linux) part of that too?

Gaël Duval: It's part of the current plan as well. The good thing is that
at the same time, it answers a strong demand from Mandrake users.

MozillaQuest Magazine: Anything else within that which you call the
business side?

Gaël Duval: Improving the Club, improving MandrakeStore: these things
also help us to make more business everyday.

__
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Security or lack thereof

2003-06-30 Thread Lyvim Xaphir


--- Vincent Danen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  There's no call for that unless some idiot user decides
  to give other people access to his/her home dir.  This
  accessibility should be a no-no by default regardless of
  distro.  
 
 This was done, IIRC, to allow people to have a ~/public_html/
 directory and allow apache to enter the home directory so as
 to read ~/public_html/ (which would allow someone to do
 something like http://yoursite.com/~preador/).
 That's pretty much the reasoning for it IIRC.  That being
 said, there is nothing stopping you from doing a higher
 security level or modifying the defaults.
 
 I also believe that a user can enter another user's home dir
 but will get a permission denied if they do an ls.  Other
 permissions protect the files in the homedir.  The homedir
 should have execute-only perms.  But, taking a quick look, it
 seems that is not the case.  H.
 
 That does kind of suck.  msec used to do execute-only perms
 on homedirs... I wonder why it decided that read/execute
 perms was an ok thing to do.
 
 I'll see if I can't find out.
 

Yes, this does sound serious.  Haven't run into difficulties yet, but I
would like to fix this on my system here when you find out what's going
on.

You da man, Vincent! :)

--LX



__
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Security or lack thereof

2003-06-30 Thread Lyvim Xaphir


--- Vincent Danen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  homedirs... I wonder why it decided that read/execute perms
  was an ok thing to do.
 
 My mistake.  I had msec level 2 on my workstation which is
 why it was read/execute perms.  Changing to level 3 gives
 back the appropriate homedir perms.
 

This sounds alot like that root window situation of mine recently. ;) 
g

--LX



__
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


[expert] Newsflash: Gentoo has forked.

2003-06-26 Thread Lyvim Xaphir

Gentoo has been one of MDK's greatest competitors so far, maintaining
fourth place at Distrowatch.com right behind Red Hat.  Mandrake of course
has almost consistently maintained it's first place position there.

I find it interesting that so far we in the Mandrake world have avoided
forking, thus maintaining our strength in concentrated form.  Even though
there are disagreements and disputes.  It shows the strength of the
Mandrake community.

Mandrakians seem to be strong in that they are able to put up with
disagreements and flaws without getting totally annoyed and just leavi?g.
 I think this is because mainly that we have voices in the form of votes
and the mailing lists.  As well as the forums.  So there is the
impression that everyone is helping to some degree.

http://www.zynot.org/info/faq.html

--LX



__
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] kernels updates !!??

2003-06-20 Thread Lyvim Xaphir
On Thu, 2003-06-19 at 23:19, Vincent Danen wrote:

 Well, trust me, I was not very pleased with the results of my queries.  Of
 course, I don't have the time or skills to fix the installkernel script
 myself.  If someone out there is feeling bored...  =)
 
  You're right though Vincent - it's been doing it over a number of
  releases.  You'll find a few posts from me in the archives on it.
 
 Yup.  And it's always been a nuisance.
 
 In my mind, the revisioned entry should be in there from the first
 install... do the symlink bit, but throw in a 2421-13 entry as well (or
 whatever).
 
 But, when I mentioned that, I was told it looked too ugly.
 
 Can't win for losing.

Hey, don't worry.  After all, you've still got me to kick around. ;D

--LX

-- 

Kernel 2.4.21-0.13mdk   Linux Mandrake 9.1
Enlightenment-0.16.5-12mdk  Evolution 1.2.4-1.1mdk
Linux User #268899 http://counter.li.org/



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


[expert] Good news: System Crashes stopped

2003-06-20 Thread Lyvim Xaphir

While I was looking for a way to speed the system up here (it had slowed
to a crawl, if you had Evo, Opera, and several Eterms open...which I do
all the time)  I decided to reduce the number of Enlightenment desktops
I had open, to gain some desktop speed.  I took the system down to two
from four.

Since that time (it's been about a week and a half) the crashes have
virtually stopped.  Because I'm seeing these results, I tend to believe
that the problems were related to memory and X.  Of course the situation
is so complex I can only intuit the real problem, but that is what it
looks like.

l8r,

--LX

-- 

Kernel 2.4.21-0.13mdk   Linux Mandrake 9.1
Enlightenment-0.16.5-12mdk  Evolution 1.2.4-1.1mdk
Linux User #268899 http://counter.li.org/



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


[expert] WineX 3.1 is out..and Morrowind works!!

2003-06-19 Thread Lyvim Xaphir

The red letter date has arrived!  Transgaming released a new version of
WineX, and believe it or not, they are claiming that Morrowind is now
working!!

Man, I can't wait to try it on this system.  Hot diggity dog.

--LX

-- 

Kernel 2.4.21-0.13mdk   Linux Mandrake 9.1
Enlightenment-0.16.5-12mdk  Evolution 1.2.4-1.1mdk
Linux User #268899 http://counter.li.org/



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


[expert] WineX 3.1 is out..and Morrowind works!!

2003-06-19 Thread Lyvim Xaphir


The red letter date has arrived!  Transgaming released a new version of
WineX, and believe it or not, they are claiming that Morrowind is now
working!!

Man, I can't wait to try it on this system.  Hot diggity dog.

--LX

-- 

Kernel 2.4.21-0.13mdk   Linux Mandrake 9.1
Enlightenment-0.16.5-12mdk  Evolution 1.2.4-1.1mdk
Linux User #268899 http://counter.li.org/



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


[expert] Sympa server outage confirmation

2003-06-19 Thread Lyvim Xaphir
Here's an explanation from the latest Mandrake newsletter giving some
more information on the downed servers.


-

If you encountered troubles when ordering this product on MandrakeStore
yesteday (06/18), please process it again. Due to a powerfailure the
plateform was not reachable during several hours.

Please accept our apologies for the inconvenience.

Thank you for your understanding,

Mandrake Online Team





--LX
-- 

Kernel 2.4.21-0.13mdk   Linux Mandrake 9.1
Enlightenment-0.16.5-12mdk  Evolution 1.2.4-1.1mdk
Linux User #268899 http://counter.li.org/



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] disk check

2003-06-19 Thread Lyvim Xaphir
On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 14:55, James Sparenberg wrote:
 On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 07:22, Brian Parish wrote:
  On Wed, 2003-06-18 at 00:01, David Hlacik wrote:
   how can i check disk partition in fat32 for errors? and how can i repair
   it.
   
   David Hlacik
   
  David,
  
  I presume that you have a fat32 partition because you have W$ on the
  machine.  So, the short answer would be scandisk or chkdsk under W$,
  there being no fsck.vfat AFAIK.  If you don't have W$, then I can only
  guess that using fat32 is a result of severe personality problems and
  refuse to talk to you any more ;-)
  
  Brian
  
 I can think of a 3rd scenario,  He is using a Linux bootable CD to
 repair hosed winders installs. (usually easier than trying to do it
 under winders.) 
 
 James

I've done that and won the t-shirt and cap.

--LX

-- 

Kernel 2.4.21-0.13mdk   Linux Mandrake 9.1
Enlightenment-0.16.5-12mdk  Evolution 1.2.4-1.1mdk
Linux User #268899 http://counter.li.org/



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] irc client

2003-06-19 Thread Lyvim Xaphir
On Thu, 2003-06-19 at 04:13, elPunishar wrote:
 DCC and everything ?
 
 On Wednesday 18 Jun 2003 15:12, Steven Broos wrote:
  If you are familiar with mIRC, then you'll like xchat.
 

I went from mIRC to xchat too.  Try it.

--LX
-- 

Kernel 2.4.21-0.13mdk   Linux Mandrake 9.1
Enlightenment-0.16.5-12mdk  Evolution 1.2.4-1.1mdk
Linux User #268899 http://counter.li.org/



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] I Found my Martians

2003-06-18 Thread Lyvim Xaphir
On Wed, 2003-06-18 at 07:17, Pierre Fortin wrote:
 On Wed, 18 Jun 2003 07:55:41 +0100 Anne Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
 
  Oops - another example of seeing the reply to a message that never 
  came through - I never got Sridhar's.  Are we all having this 
  problem?
  
  Anne
 
 Hmmm...  too bad we don't have access to the list servers...  missing
 posts and duplicated posts -- gotta wonder if one of the servers has a
 glitch where it forwards the wrong msg at times...
 


The servers went down sometime around 3:18AM 06/18 and didn't get back
up until about 45 minutes ago.

--LX

-- 

Kernel 2.4.21-0.13mdk   Linux Mandrake 9.1
Enlightenment-0.16.5-12mdk  Evolution 1.2.4-1.1mdk
Linux User #268899 http://counter.li.org/



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


[expert] Linus Torvalds leaves Transmeta

2003-06-17 Thread Lyvim Xaphir

OSDL scores bigtime.


---
Original URL: http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/31245.html

Torvalds leaves Transmeta
By Tony Smith
Posted: 17/06/2003 at 10:47 GMT

Linux creator Linus Torvalds is to quit Transmeta after six years to
work full time on the open source operating system's kernel.

In an email posted on the Linux Kernel Mailing List, Torvalds announces
the long-awaited 2.5.72 kernel release.

But tucked down toward the bottom, he says: The other big news - well,
for me personally, anyway - is that I've decided to take a
leave-of-absence after six+ years at Transmeta to actually work
full-time on the kernel.

To be fair, it seems that's largely what he's been doing at Transmeta.
The chip company always said, when his appointment was announced back in
early 1998, that he would be granted time to continue his work on the
kernel. Indeed, the man himself admits that Transmeta has always been
very good at letting me spend even an inordinate amount of time on
Linux and I do not expect a huge amount of change as a result,
testament to just how freely Transmeta has let me do Linux work.

As a result, I've been feeling a little guilty about how little 'real
work' I've been doing lately, Linus admits.

Is he being political? Did he jump or was he pushed? Linus is a pretty
self-effacing fellow, and his BS quotient seems pretty low, so it's
worth taking the email at face value.

So from 1 July, Linus will be working for the non-profits Open Source
Development Lab, whose own sponsors are listed here. Larry Augustin, CEO
of VA Software, an OSDL sponsor, said:I'm very pleased that we were
able to create a place where Linus will be able to work full time on the
kernel. 

Oddly enough, we looked at the ODSL situations vacant column but there
was no sign of a 'Full-time Open Source Deity, must be non-smoker'
listed among the Wanted ads. Clearly the vacancy has been filled...

Whatever, Linus is finally being paid to do what he loves doing most,
and you can't fault him for that. ®



--LX

-- 

Kernel 2.4.21-0.13mdk   Linux Mandrake 9.1
Enlightenment-0.16.5-12mdk  Evolution 1.2.4-1.1mdk
Linux User #268899 http://counter.li.org/



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Suggestions to help Minimize List Email Traffic

2003-06-17 Thread Lyvim Xaphir
On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 10:17, Brian Parish wrote:
 On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 23:43, Tru64 User wrote:
  Hi All,
  
  The list I am refering to is for tru64 Unix 
  ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  
  IMHO, that list serves much better purpose than this
  one. Searching their archives, its almost 100% hit on
  subjects that have been discussed before. And, better
  yet, one always goes for the SUMMARY/Resolution. Isnt
  that what we all want? Or is this a Gossip corner??
  For a Gossip corner, we are OKbut for true
  learning and solving of problems, we need solutions!
  
 I think we get the idea, but you need to accept that the people here on
 this list like the way it is.  I haven't read all the messages in this
 thread, but those I've seen were pretty negative to the idea.
 
 It may be tough to find relevant hits in the archives sometimes, but
 it's damn easy to get help when you need it here (or at least sympathy
 ;-)
 
 Gossip corner forever!
 
 Brian
 

Heh.  ;)

--LX

-- 

Kernel 2.4.21-0.13mdk   Linux Mandrake 9.1
Enlightenment-0.16.5-12mdk  Evolution 1.2.4-1.1mdk
Linux User #268899 http://counter.li.org/



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


[expert] Extracting a URL from a Java applet

2003-06-16 Thread Lyvim Xaphir


The scenario is that I would like to pass a url to mplayer from a
Javascript applet, so I can play a WMA soundstream.  Manually; like with
copy and paste, straight to the command line.  However it's like pulling
eyeteeth to get a source URL out of a java applet.  Does anybody have a
way to do this?  Seems like Miark posted a similar solution a while back
using Lynx, but I can't remember if that was relevant or not.

Any help would be nice.

--LX

-- 

Kernel 2.4.21-0.13mdk   Linux Mandrake 9.1
Enlightenment-0.16.5-12mdk  Evolution 1.2.4-1.1mdk
Linux User #268899 http://counter.li.org/



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Copy/paste between eterm and kmail not working

2003-06-15 Thread Lyvim Xaphir
On Sun, 2003-06-15 at 08:49, Ronald J. Hall wrote:
 On Sunday 15 June 2003 08:35 am, stefmit wrote:
  Very weird situation - didn't pay much attention to it, until now, when -
  due to some immediate needs to resolve some issues via email - it seems to
  go beyond a simple nuisance level: I can highlight (thus copy) anything
  from any window, and then paste by mid-click-ing (does this sound
  winblowz-like, or what ? ;( ), except from a terminal window (eterm, to be
  more specific) to kmail, where I need to go through nedit, for example
  (i.e. I highlight what I need copied from eterm -- paste into nedit --
  highlight in nedit -- paste into kmail). Winmgr used: IceWM. Has anybody
  experienced this? My hope is to upgrade IceWM, to see if this changes
  behavior ... reason for another email of mine, in regards to how to do this
  clean for the urpmi database...
 
  TIA,
  Stef
 
 Stef, you'll find a thread I started on this subject on the newbie list. To 
 cut to the chase - there was no answer. Others users seem to be able to do it 
 just fine, but I can't either. I can use Klipper by highlighting what I need 
 in Eterm, then go to Klipper, click on that entry, go to where I want it, and 
 paste it there. Its an extra step, but I don't know why its like that for 
 some of us but not for others. Just out of curiosity, are you using the 
 download edition of 9.1? Thats what I'm using. I'm wondering maybe if its a 
 diff. between the download edition and the boxed set?
 
 Never had this problem with the 9.0 boxed set.

I'd like to add something to this, if I may.  During the 9.1 development
cycle, I took the time to download the cooker edition of 9.1 and was
testing it in a work environment.  I found the problem you gentlemen are
discussing above and then went to http://qa.mandrakesoft.com where I
posted a bugreport to Bugzilla concerning it.  It was not addressed, and
went unfixed.

So Darklord, there's alot I'm not saying here that could be said
offlist.


--LX
-- 

Kernel 2.4.21-0.13mdk   Linux Mandrake 9.1
Enlightenment-0.16.5-12mdk  Evolution 1.2.4-1.1mdk
Linux User #268899 http://counter.li.org/



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Wanted to try wine

2003-06-15 Thread Lyvim Xaphir
On Sat, 2003-06-14 at 12:37, Jack Coates wrote:
 On Fri, 2003-06-13 at 16:22, Jason Guidry wrote:
  Piero Piutti wrote:
   Do you know if the cvs works fine as well?
  
  I'm working on it, I'll report back on how it goes
  
 
 Just tried Transgaming with a couple of kid games, no success. They both
 install okay, but neither runs.
 
 Arthur's Wilderness Adventure
 Rescue Heroes Hurricane Havoc.
 
 Will take this to the Transgaming list of course, but thought I'd bring
 it up in light of recent threads :-)

What Transgaming list?  I thought there were only forums on the
Transgaming site.  Is there a list?

--LX

-- 

Kernel 2.4.21-0.13mdk   Linux Mandrake 9.1
Enlightenment-0.16.5-12mdk  Evolution 1.2.4-1.1mdk
Linux User #268899 http://counter.li.org/



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Copy/paste between eterm and kmail not working

2003-06-15 Thread Lyvim Xaphir
On Sun, 2003-06-15 at 18:31, James Sparenberg wrote:
 On Sun, 2003-06-15 at 06:48, Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
  On Sun, 2003-06-15 at 08:49, Ronald J. Hall wrote:
  
   just fine, but I can't either. I can use Klipper by highlighting what I need 
   in Eterm, then go to Klipper, click on that entry, go to where I want it, and 
   paste it there. Its an extra step, but I don't know why its like that for 
   some of us but not for others. Just out of curiosity, are you using the 
   download edition of 9.1? Thats what I'm using. I'm wondering maybe if its a 
   diff. between the download edition and the boxed set?
   
   Never had this problem with the 9.0 boxed set.
  
  I'd like to add something to this, if I may.  During the 9.1 development
  cycle, I took the time to download the cooker edition of 9.1 and was
  testing it in a work environment.  I found the problem you gentlemen are
  discussing above and then went to http://qa.mandrakesoft.com where I
  posted a bugreport to Bugzilla concerning it.  It was not addressed, and
  went unfixed.
  
  So Darklord, there's alot I'm not saying here that could be said
  offlist.
  
  
  --LX
 
 And a lot your not saying here that you did (righteously) say then
 Ice in 9.1 is IMHO hosed.  I moved back to the 9.0 rpms and it all began
 to work right.  Then put ICE into the skiplist for urpmi.  I had my own
 bugs but they also got ignored *sigh*  BUT the 9.0 rpms work just
 fine on 9.1 if anyone is interested.
 
 James
 

Thanks alot for the nod, James!  It's appreciated.  Sometimes I wonder
whether the content is being read or not, and it's times like this that
I feel it was worth the effort to put into email.

I think we both love the distro, but then we both have been around long
enough to realize that if there are not some corrections made (by virtue
of someone talking about the less than pleasant things) then we will
find ourselves inside the event horizon of the black hole.  Then it will
be too late.

Now is the time to be applying the thrusters to get some altitude.  Only
thing is you and I both have been slapping the throttle to no avail; I'm
starting to think that there's something wrong with the hydraulics.

And btw, who cut the wires to the warning lights, James?

--LX
-- 

Kernel 2.4.21-0.13mdk   Linux Mandrake 9.1
Enlightenment-0.16.5-12mdk  Evolution 1.2.4-1.1mdk
Linux User #268899 http://counter.li.org/



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Running updatedb crashes my comp!

2003-06-14 Thread Lyvim Xaphir
On Sat, 2003-06-14 at 00:26, Ronald J. Hall wrote:
 Okay, a bit of an update. I deleted the slocate.db.tmp file in 
 /var/lib/slocate, and reran updatedb. Crash - spont. reboot.
 
 I did a urpme slocate, then a urpmi slocate. Reran updatedb.
 Crash - spont. reboot.
 
 I turned DMA off to /dev/hda, then reran updatedb. Crash -spont. reboot.
 
 sigh Thank goodness for jounaling FSs!
 
 Let me thank everyone who's tried to help so far. I guess I ought to mention 
 that under v9.0 of Mandrake, this same hardware setup did not have this 
 problem at all.


DL,

That means that you've troubleshot the problem down to either a bad
package, a configuration problem, or a compatibility issue.  If the
hardware was pristine on a previous distro, that basically means you've
already run a battery of tests on it and it passed.  Assuming that the
use of the hardware was over a sufficiently long time; say at least over
a month or two. g

Seems like I remember some kind of difficulty with updatedb and the
/proc directory; but that was a looong time ago and the specifics elude
me.

The logic of this says to me that if your system is installed off the
cd's just like everybody else's is, then you should be getting the
results that everyone else is getting.  Since we know your hardware is
pristine, and since you are NOT getting the results you should be, that
leans me towards some kind of compatibility problem.  Which possibly can
be resolved by tweaking the configuration in some way.

Have you checked the system logs for clues?

--LX
-- 

Kernel 2.4.21-0.13mdk   Linux Mandrake 9.1
Enlightenment-0.16.5-12mdk  Evolution 1.2.4-1.1mdk
Linux User #268899 http://counter.li.org/



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Running updatedb crashes my comp!

2003-06-14 Thread Lyvim Xaphir
On Sat, 2003-06-14 at 14:15, Lorne wrote:

 
 Would it be out of the question to load 9.0 on it again fresh and see if the 
 problem goes away? Even if you put it on another hard drive. Although it 
 would be better to use the same HD if possible. I've been watching the thread 
 and even though it acts like hardware, some folks have certainly come up with 
 very good arguments why it may be some sort of package issue. 
 


This is an excellent idea.  It is a good way to verify without question
wether this is a hardware issue or a package/compatibility/config
issue.  I've done this myself in the past.

If you have a spare partition, I would definitely try Lorne's
suggestion.

--LX

-- 

Kernel 2.4.21-0.13mdk   Linux Mandrake 9.1
Enlightenment-0.16.5-12mdk  Evolution 1.2.4-1.1mdk
Linux User #268899 http://counter.li.org/



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] WMAs under Linux?

2003-06-07 Thread Lyvim Xaphir
On Sat, 2003-06-07 at 02:32, Rob Blomquist wrote:
 With the proliferation of streaming WMAs under Linux, I am wondering if there 
 are any programs to play these, or plugins that are in development for XMMS?
 
 Rob

You may not believe this but right now I'm listening to a Rush Limbaugh
WMA audio stream over broadband with mplayer.  The way I do it, you have
to have the URL to the WMA stream.  Sometimes the Windows media links
won't let you have that; but there may be a plugin for the browsers that
would get by that problem; I've never tried it tho.

The mplayer version I've got here is the one that ships with 9.1, with
no modifications or even the windows dll codecs installed.

Here's an example command line for mplayer.  The following is actually
all one line: 

 mplayer -cache 1024
mms://g.vm.akamaistream.net/rushlimb.download.akamai.com/shows/RUSHLIMBWIN20036060.WMA

These days there exist annoying java scripts that do alot to hide the
real url's of the streams.  I know there's a way to extract the url
information from the active java script, I just haven't ever had to do
that so far because most of the sites I go to don't have that asinine
stuff.  But still it would be nice to have a method to extract the url
info no matter what.

Seems like Miark had something like that a while back...got to ask him
about that.

HTH, and write back if you have further questions.


--LX
-- 

Kernel 2.4.21-0.13mdk   Linux Mandrake 9.1
Enlightenment-0.16.5-12mdk  Evolution 1.2.4-1.1mdk
Linux User #268899 http://counter.li.org/



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Mail formats revisited

2003-06-07 Thread Lyvim Xaphir
On Fri, 2003-06-06 at 15:23, Anne Wilson wrote:
 On Friday 06 Jun 2003 8:14 pm, Steffen Barszus wrote:
  Am Freitag, 6. Juni 2003 21:04 schrieb Anne Wilson:
   My dally with evo made me aware that I had a mixture of maildir
   and mbox for my mail - obviously not ideal - so I set out to
   convert to one.  I chose mbox, because it is transparent.  I know
   that if I could not use kmail I can open one of my archive
   folders in a text editor and do a search to find anything I need.
I like the comfort factor that gives me.
  
   I have heard it said, though, that mbox if bad, and maildir is
   good. Why?  Are there any overriding reasons for going that way?
  
   Anne
 
  Hmm at least your argument for mbox isn't really valid. Maildir is
  too plain text and directories. 
 
 But searching 10,000 archived messages individually for a particular 
 phrase is not a good idea.  One large file with the messages 
 concatenated is much easier, if slow.
 
  Don't know which one is better.
  Maybe this is interesting for you (not really;))
 
  http://www.courier-mta.org/mbox-vs-maildir/#theend
 
 Having read that, I think it's a matter of 'you pays your money and 
 you takes your choice' - which is fine by me.  There doesn't seem to 
 be any strong reason to override personal preference.
 
 Thanks, Steffen
 
 Anne
 

Mbox is considered an inferior format because in the past it has
resulted in the loss of much mail.  Potentially if the file borks you
lose the whole load.

Maildir, on the other hand (as others have already stated) stores the
text in files which all have naming conventions that are determined by
standardized procedures stored in an RFC somewhere.  The advantage to
this is that if there is damage to any of the files, you might lose a
few emails but you won't nuke the whole storehouse.

The reasons the different directories exist (cur, tmp, and new) is a
further refinement of the safety process built into the maildir
procedures, in that when mail is being received, it is granted a
temporary position in the tmp spot and then moved to the new
directory after it is safely written.  This lowers the possibility that
inodes in any other vital directories (such as where the main email
storage is) won't get borked during the file creation process if
something goes wrong. Only after the email has been totally written and
created (i.e. stabilized) is it moved to it's final position in new.

The new directory loses it's email as soon as a MUA program (such as
Evolution) reads the mail.  Evo knows to look in new for new email,
and as soon as it does the mail is planted in cur for categorization or
retrieval.

One thing that kind of bothers me is that Dan Bernstein, the author of
Qmail, happens to be the guy that came up with the entire Maildir
scheme, and although his concept has been widely used, few people know
who's genius it was that originated it.  In other words it was
originally a qmail function and has since been ripped for use in other
MTA programs (because of it's popularity), offtimes without the
recognition that Dan Bernstein (DJB) designed it.

What you have to realize is that with mbox, every time you get email,
every single message is basically an append to one single large file,
the file that contains your email.  That's a lot of chances for
something to go wrong.  Sooner or later the law of averages is going to
catch up with somebody. (and it already has) One example I can think of
is if you are receiving email while the power goes out.  An mbox being
written to is in an indeterminate state.

--LX

-- 

Kernel 2.4.21-0.13mdk   Linux Mandrake 9.1
Enlightenment-0.16.5-12mdk  Evolution 1.2.4-1.1mdk
Linux User #268899 http://counter.li.org/



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Mail formats revisited

2003-06-07 Thread Lyvim Xaphir
On Sat, 2003-06-07 at 05:03, Anne Wilson wrote:

 
 Thanks for that explanation, Lyvim.  It's given me a lot to think 
 about.  The thing that put me off maildir was that when I tried to 
 import from KMail into Evo it wouldn't read the mail.  I tried both 
 reading methods in the import, but it wouldn't read a single file.  
 This made me feel that it was almost as bad as the proprietary 
 formats found elsewhere.
 
 Have you any thoughts on that?
 
 Anne

I have done it, but there are several qualifications for doing this.
First, if you are transporting from Kmail to Evo like you are, Kmail
should be made to put ALL subfolders back into the inbox; this way you
can snag or convert everything at once since categorized or filtered
email will not be seen(because it is in other folders).  Evo filters can
be applied later to the whole imported load.  Second, you tell Kmail to
convert to Maildir format.  This will cause Kmail to create the new,
cur, and tmp dirs and then move each message seperately to an
appropriate filename within the ~/Mail/inbox/cur directory.  Third, you
copy the files in the newly converted Kmail inbox (Which for some wierd
reason seems to be ~/Mail instead of ~/Maildir for maildir mail) over to
the Evo Maildir/new dir.  


With Evo already in Maildir format, Evo should have a configuration for
receiving mail that says /home/you/Maildir for it's folder
configuration.  With Evo in that mode, when you look at the folder tree
(within Evo), you will see a tree that starts with your email name, and
a dot (.) tree underneath it.  That dot is actually the ~/Maildir/cur
directory.

Now all you do at this point is to go to the Kmail main inbox dir 
( ~/Mail/inbox/cur ) and then copy everything over to the Evo Maildir
directory for incoming mail.  Which is ~/Maildir/new.

So

cp -v ~/Mail/inbox/cur/* ~/Maildir/new

After that, go back to Evo and click on another folder in the tree
somewhere, and Evo will see the ~/Maildir/new directory and then create
an index of sorts for all the new mail, then it will be moved over to
the ~/Maildir/cur directory, where you can then apply the Evo filters
you have set up.

How's that?  ;)

HTH..


--LX

P.S.  One more thing.  Any mail that's filed under your Evo dot
directory will be in Maildir format.  Any mail that's filed in the Evo
main tree above that will be in mbox format, *no matter what method*
you've chosen under the Mail Accounts settings.

So in order to keep all your mail in Maildir format, your custom
categorization folders need to be created *under the dot directory* in
the Evo tree.

-- 

Kernel 2.4.21-0.13mdk   Linux Mandrake 9.1
Enlightenment-0.16.5-12mdk  Evolution 1.2.4-1.1mdk
Linux User #268899 http://counter.li.org/



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


[expert] Gone for a week

2003-06-07 Thread Lyvim Xaphir

Peeps,

I'll be off the lists for about 8 days.  Thought I'd try to make some
people happy. ;)

We're going out of state on vacation.  I know it will be very hard for
you guys to do without me, but please do your best. g

l8r,

--LX
-- 

Kernel 2.4.21-0.13mdk   Linux Mandrake 9.1
Enlightenment-0.16.5-12mdk  Evolution 1.2.4-1.1mdk
Linux User #268899 http://counter.li.org/



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] chmod question

2003-06-06 Thread Lyvim Xaphir
On Fri, 2003-06-06 at 23:00, James Sparenberg wrote:
 On Sat, 2003-06-07 at 03:08, charlie wrote:
  On Fri, 6 Jun 2003 04:30 am, Michael Noble sent this :-
P.S.  In the future, please consider asking this sort of question on the
newbie list (or, better yet, on a generic linux/unix list.)
 YCITMIGA...
  
   Come on this list is for people to learn and ask questions.
  
   Mike
  
  I too found the above a strange request, I thought it was a good, applies to 
  the topic, question, and it might be differently done in Mandrake than in 
  some other distro.
  
  Charlie
 
 Personally I don't see how this one could have been a newbie question. 
 Most newbies wouldn't even know permissions exist.  Let alone that they
 have an affect on anything. Remember in windows the concept of
 ownership isn't really there.  Let's leave elitism to the cooker list
 and get on with it.
 
 James
 


Well spoken, James!

--LX

-- 

Kernel 2.4.21-0.13mdk   Linux Mandrake 9.1
Enlightenment-0.16.5-12mdk  Evolution 1.2.4-1.1mdk
Linux User #268899 http://counter.li.org/



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


  1   2   3   4   5   >