Re: [FairfieldLife] Hypocrisy (was Re: Maharishi's name)

2006-07-03 Thread Rick Archer
Title: Re: [FairfieldLife] Hypocrisy (was Re: Maharishi's name)





on 7/2/06 9:00 AM, nablus108 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Regarding Maharishis invincebility: his plane was blown up 
(Maharishi just did'nt turn up but called the pilots and told them 
to get out quickly), armed men have been found in Sonnenberg. And 
thats just the tip of the iceberg after that 
peanutfarmer/fundamentalist Jimmy Carter sent the CIA after him. 
But who prevails ? Maharishi obviously is so strongly protected that 
unknown (at least to me) levels of intelligence tells him where and 
when to be present.

There was a phase in Switzerland when all kinds of things were happening to him and he went into hiding in his room for a month. He got a bad shock from a faulty tape recorder, his driver hit a motorcyclist, and worst of all, his helicopter crashed. He was banged up a bit in that one.

__._,_.___





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








   






  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Religion and spirituality
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  






__,_._,___





Re: [FairfieldLife] Hypocrisy (was Re: Maharishi's name)

2006-07-03 Thread Rick Archer
Title: Re: [FairfieldLife] Hypocrisy (was Re: Maharishi's name)





on 7/1/06 8:34 AM, Patrick Gillam at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Maybe Maharishi had the same delusion I did.
Just as I thought I was essentially a non-smoker 
even as I puffed away at my La Unicas, he was 
able to think he was celibate when he dallying
with his gopis.

Another possibility, which Im open to, is that at his stage of evolution celibacy made no difference, but he needed to recommend it to his students. Would he have been able to explain that point to them?

__._,_.___





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








   






  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Religion and spirituality
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  






__,_._,___





[FairfieldLife] Hypocrisy (was Re: Maharishi's name)

2006-07-03 Thread shempmcgurk

 on 7/2/06 9:00 AM, nablus108 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
  Regarding Maharishis invincebility: his plane was blown up
  (Maharishi just did'nt turn up but called the pilots and told them
  to get out quickly), armed men have been found in Sonnenberg. And
  thats just the tip of the iceberg after that
  peanutfarmer/fundamentalist Jimmy Carter sent the CIA after him.






What proof do you have that the CIA was after MMY?







  But who prevails ? Maharishi obviously is so strongly protected 
that
  unknown (at least to me) levels of intelligence tells him where and
  when to be present.
  






 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Great things are happening at Yahoo! Groups.  See the new email design.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/TISQkA/hOaOAA/yQLSAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Hypocrisy (was Re: Maharishi's name)

2006-07-03 Thread wayback71
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
  on 7/2/06 9:00 AM, nablus108 at nablus108@ wrote:
   
   Regarding Maharishis invincebility: his plane was blown up
   (Maharishi just did'nt turn up but called the pilots and told them
   to get out quickly), armed men have been found in Sonnenberg. And
   thats just the tip of the iceberg after that
   peanutfarmer/fundamentalist Jimmy Carter sent the CIA after him.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 What proof do you have that the CIA was after MMY?

I believe it MMY himself who said the CIA was after him.  I heard that the 
windows of 
passageways in Seelisberg were covered with paper so that no one could see 
people and 
MMY moving about inside the building.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   But who prevails ? Maharishi obviously is so strongly protected 
 that
   unknown (at least to me) levels of intelligence tells him where and
   when to be present.
  








 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Great things are happening at Yahoo! Groups.  See the new email design.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/TISQkA/hOaOAA/yQLSAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Hypocrisy (was Re: Maharishi's name)

2006-07-03 Thread new . morning
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wayback71 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  What proof do you have that the CIA was after MMY?
 
 I believe it MMY himself who said the CIA was after him.  I heard
that the windows of 
 passageways in Seelisberg were covered with paper so that no one
could see people and 
 MMY moving about inside the building.

The latter is true, i saw it. Kind of errie. But I don't remember him
specifically attributing that to the CIA.







 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
See what's inside the new Yahoo! Groups email.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/2pRQfA/bOaOAA/yQLSAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Hypocrisy (was Re: Maharishi's name)

2006-07-03 Thread Kenny H
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 on 7/1/06 8:34 AM, Patrick Gillam at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
  Maybe Maharishi had the same delusion I did.
  Just as I thought I was essentially a non-smoker
  even as I puffed away at my La Unicas, he was
  able to think he was celibate when he dallying
  with his gopis.
  
 Another possibility, which I¹m open to, is that at his stage of
evolution
 celibacy made no difference, but he needed to recommend it to his
students.
 Would he have been able to explain that point to them?


I'm not certain how this fits in here but what you said, above,
broguth this to mind. There are many stories in various aspects of the
vedic literature, probably the puranas, of these guys who go off to
the forest, practice celibacy, and other forms or austerities for many
years, build up great spiritual reserve, get boons granted to them,
then some celestial nymph comes along and tempts them and in one
moment they lose all the spiritual potency they took so long to achieve. 





 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Something is new at Yahoo! Groups.  Check out the enhanced email design.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/SISQkA/gOaOAA/yQLSAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [FairfieldLife] Hypocrisy (was Re: Maharishi's name)

2006-07-03 Thread Rick Archer
Title: Re: [FairfieldLife] Hypocrisy (was Re: Maharishi's name)





on 7/3/06 12:55 PM, Kenny H at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com , Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 on 7/1/06 8:34 AM, Patrick Gillam at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
  Maybe Maharishi had the same delusion I did.
  Just as I thought I was essentially a non-smoker
  even as I puffed away at my La Unicas, he was
  able to think he was celibate when he dallying
  with his gopis.
  
 Another possibility, which Im open to, is that at his stage of
evolution
 celibacy made no difference, but he needed to recommend it to his
students.
 Would he have been able to explain that point to them?


I'm not certain how this fits in here but what you said, above,
broguth this to mind. 

Broguth - Plu perfect subjunctive participle of to bring - Strunk  Archer

__._,_.___





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








   






  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Religion and spirituality
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  






__,_._,___





[FairfieldLife] Hypocrisy (was Re: Maharishi's name)

2006-07-03 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wayback71 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@ wrote:
 
  
   on 7/2/06 9:00 AM, nablus108 at nablus108@ wrote:

Regarding Maharishis invincebility: his plane was blown up
(Maharishi just did'nt turn up but called the pilots and told them
to get out quickly), armed men have been found in Sonnenberg. And
thats just the tip of the iceberg after that
peanutfarmer/fundamentalist Jimmy Carter sent the CIA after him.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  What proof do you have that the CIA was after MMY?
 
 I believe it MMY himself who said the CIA was after him.  I heard that the 
 windows of 
 passageways in Seelisberg were covered with paper so that no one could see 
 people and 
 MMY moving about inside the building.
  


Actually, during the Carter administration, the US government WAS out to get 
him and the 
TMO specifically. What get actually means, who can say, but Carter was very 
definitely 
anti-TM and is now known to have used the US government to go after hindu 
influences in 
this country.





 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Something is new at Yahoo! Groups.  Check out the enhanced email design.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/SISQkA/gOaOAA/yQLSAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Hypocrisy (was Re: Maharishi's name)

2006-07-03 Thread cardemaister
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 on 7/3/06 12:55 PM, Kenny H at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife%
40yahoogroups.com
  , Rick Archer groups@ wrote:
  
   on 7/1/06 8:34 AM, Patrick Gillam at jpgillam@ wrote:

Maybe Maharishi had the same delusion I did.
Just as I thought I was essentially a non-smoker
even as I puffed away at my La Unicas, he was
able to think he was celibate when he dallying
with his gopis.

   Another possibility, which I¹m open to, is that at his stage of
  evolution
   celibacy made no difference, but he needed to recommend it to 
his
  students.
   Would he have been able to explain that point to them?
  
  
  I'm not certain how this fits in here but what you said, above,
  broguth this to mind.
 
 ³Broguth² - Plu perfect subjunctive participle of ³to bring² - 
Strunk 
 Archer


Wouldn't that be 'had brogthu'?





 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Check out the new improvements in Yahoo! Groups email.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/6pRQfA/fOaOAA/yQLSAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [FairfieldLife] Hypocrisy (was Re: Maharishi's name)

2006-07-03 Thread MDixon6569






In a message dated 7/3/06 10:16:42 A.M. Central Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  
  
  on 
  7/2/06 9:00 AM, nablus108 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Regarding Maharishis invincebility: his plane 
was blown up (Maharishi just did'nt turn up but called the pilots and 
told them to get out quickly), armed men have been found in 
Sonnenberg.

I never heard this, any 
details?
__._,_.___





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








   



  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  






__,_._,___



[FairfieldLife] Hypocrisy (was Re: Maharishi's name)

2006-07-03 Thread shempmcgurk
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wayback71 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@ 
wrote:
 
  
   on 7/2/06 9:00 AM, nablus108 at nablus108@ wrote:

Regarding Maharishis invincebility: his plane was blown up
(Maharishi just did'nt turn up but called the pilots and 
told them
to get out quickly), armed men have been found in 
Sonnenberg. And
thats just the tip of the iceberg after that
peanutfarmer/fundamentalist Jimmy Carter sent the CIA after 
him.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  What proof do you have that the CIA was after MMY?
 
 I believe it MMY himself who said the CIA was after him.  I heard 
that the windows of 
 passageways in Seelisberg were covered with paper so that no one 
could see people and 
 MMY moving about inside the building.




Uh, that's not proof; it's paranoia





  
  
  
  
  
  
  
But who prevails ? Maharishi obviously is so strongly 
protected 
  that
unknown (at least to me) levels of intelligence tells him 
where and
when to be present.
   
 







 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Check out the new improvements in Yahoo! Groups email.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/6pRQfA/fOaOAA/yQLSAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Hypocrisy (was Re: Maharishi's name)

2006-07-02 Thread shempmcgurk
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Kenny H [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:


[snip]

 
 Personally, I always thought that Maharishi should have kept his
 message as simple as it first started out-twenty minutes twice per 
day
 then go about living your normal life, no change in lifestyle 
required
 (yes I know, this is where people will say, well you didn't have 
to
 choose to add everything else), 200% of life--100% inner + 100%
 outer, etc. We used to tell people at intro lectures that the great
 thing about TM was that you didn't even have to believe in it, 
which,
 of course you still don't, but we also used to say that it was not 
a
 lifestyle. It was a fairly innocent message with a smack of 
Hinduism
 which made it all the more delicious during that era. 
 
[snip]

He'd actually have a movement today had he done the above.

Now, it's no longer a movement despite having many people involved.  
It's not a movement because it isn't moving or going anywhere...no 
new people are joining.





 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Something is new at Yahoo! Groups.  Check out the enhanced email design.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/SISQkA/gOaOAA/yQLSAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Hypocrisy (was Re: Maharishi's name)

2006-07-02 Thread nablus108
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, matrixmonitor 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --Thanks, I don't believe MMY is invincible, either, on the basis 
of 
 my experiment in the late 70's.  At that time,  the SRM lease was 
up 
 at the old brick building on Santa Monica Blvd; and Charlie Lutes 
 moved into an office at the West L.A. TM center down the road 
toward 
 Santa Monica.
   Having learned that a powerful Santeria sorcerer from Cuba 
 named El Negro was traveling through Mexico, I was able to meet 
him 
 in Tijuana.  To test MMY's level of invincibility, I paid the 
 Sorcerer to place a hex on MMY; and after giving El Negro some 
pics 
 of MMY, left Tijuana and returned to L.A.
  A few days later I saw Charlie at the West L.A. TM center and in 
due 
 course of conversation, he told me that MMY was taking very 
 extraordinary precautions to pretect himself by being surrounded 
 physically by numerous people.  To the best of my knowledge, no 
harm 
 came to MMY; but on the basis of the results, I don't feel he's 
 invincible. 
 
 
 
 - In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Gillam jpgillam@ 
 wrote:
 
  --- authfriend wrote:
  
   The most devoted followers are always
   going to try to emulate the master every way they can,
   no matter what the master says or doesn't say.  And
   they're all going to have some idea of what
   constitutes good behavior.  I think to some extent
   the conundrum is unavoidable.
  
  Agreed. I've told the story before how Rudolf 
  Steiner, upon removing a pebble from his shoe,
  said, I need to do this right away, otherwise 
  all my students will be walking with limps tomorrow.
  
  (paraphrased, of course)

You paid someone to put a spell on Maharishi ? How stupid can anyone 
become ?

Regarding Maharishis invincebility: his plane was blown up 
(Maharishi just did'nt turn up but called the pilots and told them 
to get out quickly), armed men have been found in Sonnenberg. And 
thats just the tip of the iceberg after that 
peanutfarmer/fundamentalist Jimmy Carter sent the CIA after him. 
But who prevails ? Maharishi obviously is so strongly protected that 
unknown (at least to me) levels of intelligence tells him where and 
when to be present.







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Hypocrisy (was Re: Maharishi's name)

2006-07-01 Thread Patrick Gillam
--- authfriend wrote:

 --- Gillam wrote:
 
  --- authfriend wrote:
  
   --- Rick  wrote:
   
If ever the topic of women or sex came up, he would feign 
ignorance, and would encourage single guys to be celibate, 
like him.
   
   And you see this as hypocrisy?
  
  (Butting in) Looks that way to me. How would you 
  interpret it, Judy? Genuinely curious. I'm not good 
  at this sort of perception.
 
 Well, I wasn't there, obviously.  But what the
 hell else could he say under the circumstances
 if he really thought the guys he was speaking to
 ought to be celibate for the sake of their
 evolution?
 
 I'm not condoning his illicit sexual behavior,
 given his position, but I'm not sure hypocrisy
 is the right term for what he told the guys.

I see the nuance, and his conundrum. 

Given the lame nature of his relationships - 
maybe 30 minutes of nooky time at the end 
of the work day now and again - he probably 
didn't perceive himself as being in a relationship. 
I'm not trying to rationalize his behavior. I'm 
just assuming he was able to rationalize it himself.

I had a spell some years ago when I enjoyed a 
cigar or two on the weekend. After about six 
months of this, I was looking at an insurance 
form that asked, Have you used any tobacco 
products in the past six months? If so, I had 
to pay the smoker's rate for insurance. At that 
point I realized, Oh my God. I'm a smoker. 
Before that, I never thought of myself as a smoker. 
It wasn't part of my identity. I was just enjoying 
a cigar or two on the weekend. 

Maybe Maharishi had the same delusion I did.
Just as I thought I was essentially a non-smoker 
even as I puffed away at my La Unicas, he was 
able to think he was celibate when he dallying
with his gopis.






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Hypocrisy (was Re: Maharishi's name)

2006-07-01 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Gillam [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 --- authfriend wrote:
 
  --- Gillam wrote:
  
   --- authfriend wrote:
   
--- Rick  wrote:

 If ever the topic of women or sex came up, he would feign 
 ignorance, and would encourage single guys to be celibate, 
 like him.

And you see this as hypocrisy?
   
   (Butting in) Looks that way to me. How would you 
   interpret it, Judy? Genuinely curious. I'm not good 
   at this sort of perception.
  
  Well, I wasn't there, obviously.  But what the
  hell else could he say under the circumstances
  if he really thought the guys he was speaking to
  ought to be celibate for the sake of their
  evolution?
  
  I'm not condoning his illicit sexual behavior,
  given his position, but I'm not sure hypocrisy
  is the right term for what he told the guys.
 
 I see the nuance, and his conundrum. 
 
 Given the lame nature of his relationships - 
 maybe 30 minutes of nooky time at the end 
 of the work day now and again - he probably 
 didn't perceive himself as being in a relationship. 
 I'm not trying to rationalize his behavior. I'm 
 just assuming he was able to rationalize it himself.
 
 I had a spell some years ago when I enjoyed a 
 cigar or two on the weekend. After about six 
 months of this, I was looking at an insurance 
 form that asked, Have you used any tobacco 
 products in the past six months? If so, I had 
 to pay the smoker's rate for insurance. At that 
 point I realized, Oh my God. I'm a smoker. 
 Before that, I never thought of myself as a smoker. 
 It wasn't part of my identity. I was just enjoying 
 a cigar or two on the weekend. 
 
 Maybe Maharishi had the same delusion I did.
 Just as I thought I was essentially a non-smoker 
 even as I puffed away at my La Unicas, he was 
 able to think he was celibate when he dallying
 with his gopis.

Certainly possible.  What I had in mind was more
that, assuming he genuinely thought it would be
better for their spiritual development if they
stayed celibate, introducing any potential
cause for confusion over that instruction (How come
he can and we can't? Is he really enlightened if he
isn't celibate? etc. etc.) could inhibit their
development, so he was essentially telling a lie
for *their* benefit.

Ends justifying the means and all that, clearly a
rationalization and not the ideal we'd like to see
by any means, but not hypocrisy per se.

I wonder how often that kind of conundrum--not just
about sex but any bad habit or behavior--masters
have to deal with, pretending they don't indulge in
that habit or behavior because they perceive
(accurately or not) that to do otherwise would confuse
their followers and get in the way of their sadhana.






 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Yahoo! Groups gets a make over. See the new email design.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/XISQkA/lOaOAA/yQLSAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Hypocrisy (was Re: Maharishi's name)

2006-07-01 Thread Patrick Gillam
--- authfriend wrote:

 I wonder how often that kind of conundrum--not just
 about sex but any bad habit or behavior--masters
 have to deal with, pretending they don't indulge in
 that habit or behavior because they perceive
 (accurately or not) that to do otherwise would confuse
 their followers and get in the way of their sadhana.

Maybe the solution would be for the master to 
promote his or her sadhana as a single element one 
adds to one's daily routine, rather than insisting 
students give up this behavior or adopt that one. 

Teaching, say, a meditation technique alone, 
without all the concomitant lifestyle stuff - 
diets, sexual protocols and such - would free
the master from having to exemplify the ideal 
lifestyle.

But what master has ever taken such a tack?
It would be bold indeed.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Hypocrisy (was Re: Maharishi's name)

2006-07-01 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Gillam jpgillam@ 
 wrote:
 
  --- authfriend wrote:
  
   --- Gillam wrote:
   
--- authfriend wrote:

 --- Rick  wrote:
 
  If ever the topic of women or sex came up, he would feign 
  ignorance, and would encourage single guys to be celibate, 
  like him.
 
 And you see this as hypocrisy?

(Butting in) Looks that way to me. How would you 
interpret it, Judy? Genuinely curious. I'm not good 
at this sort of perception.
   
   Well, I wasn't there, obviously.  But what the
   hell else could he say under the circumstances
   if he really thought the guys he was speaking to
   ought to be celibate for the sake of their
   evolution?
   
   I'm not condoning his illicit sexual behavior,
   given his position, but I'm not sure hypocrisy
   is the right term for what he told the guys.
  
  I see the nuance, and his conundrum. 
  
  Given the lame nature of his relationships - 
  maybe 30 minutes of nooky time at the end 
  of the work day now and again - he probably 
  didn't perceive himself as being in a relationship. 
  I'm not trying to rationalize his behavior. I'm 
  just assuming he was able to rationalize it himself.
  
  I had a spell some years ago when I enjoyed a 
  cigar or two on the weekend. After about six 
  months of this, I was looking at an insurance 
  form that asked, Have you used any tobacco 
  products in the past six months? If so, I had 
  to pay the smoker's rate for insurance. At that 
  point I realized, Oh my God. I'm a smoker. 
  Before that, I never thought of myself as a smoker. 
  It wasn't part of my identity. I was just enjoying 
  a cigar or two on the weekend. 
  
  Maybe Maharishi had the same delusion I did.
  Just as I thought I was essentially a non-smoker 
  even as I puffed away at my La Unicas, he was 
  able to think he was celibate when he dallying
  with his gopis.
 
 Certainly possible.  What I had in mind was more
 that, assuming he genuinely thought it would be
 better for their spiritual development if they
 stayed celibate, introducing any potential
 cause for confusion over that instruction (How come
 he can and we can't? Is he really enlightened if he
 isn't celibate? etc. etc.) could inhibit their
 development, so he was essentially telling a lie
 for *their* benefit.
 
 Ends justifying the means and all that, clearly a
 rationalization and not the ideal we'd like to see
 by any means, but not hypocrisy per se.
 
 I wonder how often that kind of conundrum--not just
 about sex but any bad habit or behavior--masters
 have to deal with, pretending they don't indulge in
 that habit or behavior because they perceive
 (accurately or not) that to do otherwise would confuse
 their followers and get in the way of their sadhana.


I recall being in an airport once with a couple of fellow sidhas while a bunch 
of Japanese 
assured us that their teacher, who was calmly smoking a cigarette in the 
corner, was the 
greatest living Zen master...








 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Great things are happening at Yahoo! Groups.  See the new email design.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/TISQkA/hOaOAA/yQLSAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Hypocrisy (was Re: Maharishi's name)

2006-07-01 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Gillam [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 --- authfriend wrote:
 
  I wonder how often that kind of conundrum--not just
  about sex but any bad habit or behavior--masters
  have to deal with, pretending they don't indulge in
  that habit or behavior because they perceive
  (accurately or not) that to do otherwise would confuse
  their followers and get in the way of their sadhana.
 
 Maybe the solution would be for the master to 
 promote his or her sadhana as a single element one 
 adds to one's daily routine, rather than insisting 
 students give up this behavior or adopt that one. 
 
 Teaching, say, a meditation technique alone, 
 without all the concomitant lifestyle stuff - 
 diets, sexual protocols and such - would free
 the master from having to exemplify the ideal 
 lifestyle.
 
 But what master has ever taken such a tack?
 It would be bold indeed.

MMY did at first, then he changed his mind.

But he was talking to teachers here, no?  Not the
rank and file.  The most devoted followers are always
going to try to emulate the master every way they can,
no matter what the master says or doesn't say.  And
they're all going to have some idea of what
constitutes good behavior.  I think to some extent
the conundrum is unavoidable.







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Hypocrisy (was Re: Maharishi's name)

2006-07-01 Thread Kenny H
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Gillam jpgillam@ 
 wrote:
 
  --- authfriend wrote:
  
   I wonder how often that kind of conundrum--not just
   about sex but any bad habit or behavior--masters
   have to deal with, pretending they don't indulge in
   that habit or behavior because they perceive
   (accurately or not) that to do otherwise would confuse
   their followers and get in the way of their sadhana.
  
  Maybe the solution would be for the master to 
  promote his or her sadhana as a single element one 
  adds to one's daily routine, rather than insisting 
  students give up this behavior or adopt that one. 
  
  Teaching, say, a meditation technique alone, 
  without all the concomitant lifestyle stuff - 
  diets, sexual protocols and such - would free
  the master from having to exemplify the ideal 
  lifestyle.
  
  But what master has ever taken such a tack?
  It would be bold indeed.
 
 MMY did at first, then he changed his mind.

Personally, I always thought that Maharishi should have kept his
message as simple as it first started out-twenty minutes twice per day
then go about living your normal life, no change in lifestyle required
(yes I know, this is where people will say, well you didn't have to
choose to add everything else), 200% of life--100% inner + 100%
outer, etc. We used to tell people at intro lectures that the great
thing about TM was that you didn't even have to believe in it, which,
of course you still don't, but we also used to say that it was not a
lifestyle. It was a fairly innocent message with a smack of Hinduism
which made it all the more delicious during that era. 



 
 But he was talking to teachers here, no?  Not the
 rank and file.  The most devoted followers are always
 going to try to emulate the master every way they can,
 no matter what the master says or doesn't say.  And
 they're all going to have some idea of what
 constitutes good behavior.  I think to some extent
 the conundrum is unavoidable.






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Hypocrisy (was Re: Maharishi's name)

2006-07-01 Thread Patrick Gillam
--- authfriend wrote:

 The most devoted followers are always
 going to try to emulate the master every way they can,
 no matter what the master says or doesn't say.  And
 they're all going to have some idea of what
 constitutes good behavior.  I think to some extent
 the conundrum is unavoidable.

Agreed. I've told the story before how Rudolf 
Steiner, upon removing a pebble from his shoe,
said, I need to do this right away, otherwise 
all my students will be walking with limps tomorrow.

(paraphrased, of course)





 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
See what's inside the new Yahoo! Groups email.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/2pRQfA/bOaOAA/yQLSAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Hypocrisy (was Re: Maharishi's name)

2006-07-01 Thread matrixmonitor
--Thanks, I don't believe MMY is invincible, either, on the basis of 
my experiment in the late 70's.  At that time,  the SRM lease was up 
at the old brick building on Santa Monica Blvd; and Charlie Lutes 
moved into an office at the West L.A. TM center down the road toward 
Santa Monica.
  Having learned that a powerful Santeria sorcerer from Cuba 
named El Negro was traveling through Mexico, I was able to meet him 
in Tijuana.  To test MMY's level of invincibility, I paid the 
Sorcerer to place a hex on MMY; and after giving El Negro some pics 
of MMY, left Tijuana and returned to L.A.
 A few days later I saw Charlie at the West L.A. TM center and in due 
course of conversation, he told me that MMY was taking very 
extraordinary precautions to pretect himself by being surrounded 
physically by numerous people.  To the best of my knowledge, no harm 
came to MMY; but on the basis of the results, I don't feel he's 
invincible. 



- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Gillam [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 --- authfriend wrote:
 
  The most devoted followers are always
  going to try to emulate the master every way they can,
  no matter what the master says or doesn't say.  And
  they're all going to have some idea of what
  constitutes good behavior.  I think to some extent
  the conundrum is unavoidable.
 
 Agreed. I've told the story before how Rudolf 
 Steiner, upon removing a pebble from his shoe,
 said, I need to do this right away, otherwise 
 all my students will be walking with limps tomorrow.
 
 (paraphrased, of course)








To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Hypocrisy (was Re: Maharishi's name)

2006-06-30 Thread Patrick Gillam
--- authfriend wrote:

 --- Rick  wrote:
 
  If ever the topic of women or sex came up, he would feign 
  ignorance, and would encourage single guys to be celibate, like him.
 
 And you see this as hypocrisy?

(Butting in) Looks that way to me. How would you 
interpret it, Judy? Genuinely curious. I'm not good 
at this sort of perception.





 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Check out the new improvements in Yahoo! Groups email.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/6pRQfA/fOaOAA/yQLSAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [FairfieldLife] Hypocrisy (was Re: Maharishi's name)

2006-06-30 Thread Vaj


On Jul 1, 2006, at 12:27 AM, authfriend wrote:--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick Gillam" [EMAIL PROTECTED]  wrote:  --- authfriend wrote:  --- Rick  wrote:  If ever the topic of women or sex came up, he would feign  ignorance, and would encourage single guys to be celibate, like  him.  And you see this as hypocrisy?  (Butting in) Looks that way to me. How would you  interpret it, Judy? Genuinely curious. I'm not good  at this sort of perception.  Well, I wasn't there, obviously.  But what the hell else could he say under the circumstances if he really thought the guys he was speaking to ought to be celibate for the sake of their evolution?  I'm not condoning his illicit sexual behavior, given his position, but I'm not sure "hypocrisy" is the right term for what he told the guys. What "term" would you like to edit in authfriend?
__._,_.___





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








   






  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Religion and spirituality
  
  
Buddha shakyamuni
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  






__,_._,___


[FairfieldLife] Hypocrisy (was Re: Maharishi's name)

2006-06-30 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 On Jul 1, 2006, at 12:27 AM, authfriend wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Gillam jpgillam@
  wrote:
 
  --- authfriend wrote:
 
  --- Rick  wrote:
 
  If ever the topic of women or sex came up, he would feign
  ignorance, and would encourage single guys to be celibate, like
  him.
 
  And you see this as hypocrisy?
 
  (Butting in) Looks that way to me. How would you
  interpret it, Judy? Genuinely curious. I'm not good
  at this sort of perception.
 
  Well, I wasn't there, obviously.  But what the
  hell else could he say under the circumstances
  if he really thought the guys he was speaking to
  ought to be celibate for the sake of their
  evolution?
 
  I'm not condoning his illicit sexual behavior,
  given his position, but I'm not sure hypocrisy
  is the right term for what he told the guys.
 
 What term would you like to edit in authfriend?

Are you unfamiliar with the term term?  I'm wondering
why you put scare quotes around it.

And it's not editing in, sorry.  Check the original,
please.

(Did you decide whether Peter was having delusions
of grandeur?  snicker)







 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
See what's inside the new Yahoo! Groups email.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/2pRQfA/bOaOAA/yQLSAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/