[FairfieldLife] Re: Gee, Louis, looks like Obama no longer likes Wright
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have Obama's jyotish chart. His pastor or guru is represented by a malefic Mercury. Mercury is the lord of the 64th navamsha. As such, it very likely that this pastor will seriously damage Obama's chances of getting the Democratic nomination. Wright's Jyotish chart notes that he's black, too. If you read enough into it, that is... --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Louis McKenzie ltm457@ wrote: I dont understand what is going on or why? Wright maybe working with the Clintons. Or it may be something to keep people from dropping off. I cant tell. shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@ wrote: What to do, Louis? You've expressed your admiration for BOTH Rev. Wright and Sen. Obama. Yet now Sen. Obama has REALLY distanced himself from the good reverend: http://tinyurl.com/3kcnbb Whose side are you on? To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!'Yahoo! Groups Links - Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Gee, Louis, looks like Obama no longer likes Wright
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, John jr_esq@ wrote: I have Obama's jyotish chart. His pastor or guru is represented by a malefic Mercury. Mercury is the lord of the 64th navamsha. As such, it very likely that this pastor will seriously damage Obama's chances of getting the Democratic nomination. Wright's Jyotish chart notes that he's black, too. If you read enough into it, that is... Meant to type 'Obama' there, not 'Wright,' but whatever... I tell you...the only thing that makes me roll my eyes in disbelief and horror more than people believing in Jyotish and astrology is their seemingly unshakable belief that a person's pastor of choice holds some kind of sway over them, or is a huge influence in their lives. Duh...guys! That's cultthink. That's you remembering all the times YOU did stupid things because Maharishi or some other guru told you to. Normal people don't DO that. They're smarter than that. In this respect, Barack Obama strikes me as pretty damned normal. The problem is not who a candidate chooses to hang with. It's the belief in others that these people, whoever they are, exert an undue influence on the candidate's thinking and decisions. I have a strong suspicion that if you did a study, the people who are most wary of Obama's association with Wright have a history *themselves* of doing what other people tell them to do, rather than thinking for themselves. So they assume that Obama is the same way. I don't see that in the man's life. I see him as a refreshingly normal human being in a country filled with sheep. The sheep can't *get through the day* without being told what to do, and so they're constantly looking for the person or persons who tell Obama what to do. Me, I just look at this whole tempest in a pisspot and say Ba. Grow the fuck up. No one needs a guru or a pastor or a self-appointed hall monitor to tell them what to do and what to think and whether it's right or wrong. Everybody always knows. Give me a candidate any day who knows *this*.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Gee, Louis, looks like Obama no longer likes Wright
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [snip] Meant to type 'Obama' there, not 'Wright,' but whatever... [snip] ...just as long as you didn't accidentally type Osama I think you'll be okay...
[FairfieldLife] Re: Gee, Louis, looks like Obama no longer likes Wright
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Angela Mailander [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Louis, I do not like the tone of the subject heading at all. Seems awfully petty to me, seems like some folks are trying to make you look bad for having admired the wrong man. A phrase like, Whose side are you on? is particularly stupid. This is not a matter of taking sides. So please just ignore those comments. Consider their source. a Thank you Angela I love to use the N-word Mailander. --- Louis McKenzie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I dont understand what is going on or why? Wright maybe working with the Clintons. Or it may be something to keep people from dropping off. I cant tell. shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What to do, Louis? You've expressed your admiration for BOTH Rev. Wright and Sen. Obama. Yet now Sen. Obama has REALLY distanced himself from the good reverend: http://tinyurl.com/3kcnbb Whose side are you on? To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!'Yahoo! Groups Links - Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
[FairfieldLife] Re: Gee, Louis, looks like Obama no longer likes Wright
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Frankly, I like that Obama has a Rev Wright. I wish the crudeness of current American politics did not force him to disown the good Rev. Straight talking, perhaps emphatic, even hypebole-driven connections can be balancing, invigorating and insightful. I hope Barack keeps Wright as part of a transparent brain-trust and kitchen cabinet. Oh, yes. By all means keep the fellow who actually believes that AIDS was created by the White Man specifically to commit genocide against African-Americans as part of the Brain-Trust to advise the President of the United States. And sitting next to Wright at the Cabinet Table we should also have Soupy Sales and Pee-Wee Herman. And why not Charles Manson for National Security Advisor? Politics today is so afraid of speaking something resembling the truth. Its largely pandering. Few want to be told that we have responsibilities, we have blames, we have burdens. America is not the great shining knight of righteousness that it could have been. It has goodness. And a lot of baggage, corruption, weak thinking and calloused hearts. I think Lincoln and Jefferson would weep at viewing today's America. Wright is a force, not alone, but one of many, together that can help steer us back to the highest form of the American Spirit. I hope Barack keeps the door open to Wright. If he doesn't, he is less different than Hill than I would like to believe. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Angela Mailander mailander111@ wrote: Louis, I do not like the tone of the subject heading at all. Seems awfully petty to me, seems like some folks are trying to make you look bad for having admired the wrong man. A phrase like, Whose side are you on? is particularly stupid. This is not a matter of taking sides. So please just ignore those comments. Consider their source. a --- Louis McKenzie ltm457@ wrote: I dont understand what is going on or why? Wright maybe working with the Clintons. Or it may be something to keep people from dropping off. I cant tell. shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@ wrote: What to do, Louis? You've expressed your admiration for BOTH Rev. Wright and Sen. Obama. Yet now Sen. Obama has REALLY distanced himself from the good reverend: http://tinyurl.com/3kcnbb Whose side are you on? To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!'Yahoo! Groups Links - Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
[FairfieldLife] Re: Gee, Louis, looks like Obama no longer likes Wright
Hey, new.morning, perhaps you and Louis can curl up and read the Protocols of the Elders of Zion together. Isn't that something that you'd like to learn from, new.morning? And then you can listen to audio tapes of Rev. Wright and Louis Farakhan and have a discussion group. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Frankly, I like that Obama has a Rev Wright. I wish the crudeness of current American politics did not force him to disown the good Rev. Straight talking, perhaps emphatic, even hypebole-driven connections can be balancing, invigorating and insightful. I hope Barack keeps Wright as part of a transparent brain-trust and kitchen cabinet. Politics today is so afraid of speaking something resembling the truth. Its largely pandering. Few want to be told that we have responsibilities, we have blames, we have burdens. America is not the great shining knight of righteousness that it could have been. It has goodness. And a lot of baggage, corruption, weak thinking and calloused hearts. I think Lincoln and Jefferson would weep at viewing today's America. Wright is a force, not alone, but one of many, together that can help steer us back to the highest form of the American Spirit. I hope Barack keeps the door open to Wright. If he doesn't, he is less different than Hill than I would like to believe. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Angela Mailander mailander111@ wrote: Louis, I do not like the tone of the subject heading at all. Seems awfully petty to me, seems like some folks are trying to make you look bad for having admired the wrong man. A phrase like, Whose side are you on? is particularly stupid. This is not a matter of taking sides. So please just ignore those comments. Consider their source. a --- Louis McKenzie ltm457@ wrote: I dont understand what is going on or why? Wright maybe working with the Clintons. Or it may be something to keep people from dropping off. I cant tell. shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@ wrote: What to do, Louis? You've expressed your admiration for BOTH Rev. Wright and Sen. Obama. Yet now Sen. Obama has REALLY distanced himself from the good reverend: http://tinyurl.com/3kcnbb Whose side are you on? To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!'Yahoo! Groups Links - Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Gee, Louis, looks like Obama no longer likes Wright
On Apr 30, 2008, at 8:39 AM, shempmcgurk wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Frankly, I like that Obama has a Rev Wright. I wish the crudeness of current American politics did not force him to disown the good Rev. Straight talking, perhaps emphatic, even hypebole-driven connections can be balancing, invigorating and insightful. I hope Barack keeps Wright as part of a transparent brain-trust and kitchen cabinet. Oh, yes. By all means keep the fellow who actually believes that AIDS was created by the White Man specifically to commit genocide against African-Americans as part of the Brain-Trust to advise the President of the United States. And sitting next to Wright at the Cabinet Table we should also have Soupy Sales and Pee-Wee Herman. And why not Charles Manson for National Security Advisor? One of the disturbing things I find in many Black preachers and Mullahs is their embracing of radical Afrocentrism, a bizarre and sad trend in even educated Blacks. Did you ever get to see the 60 Minutes segment (years ago) with Mary Lefkowitz and _Not Out of Africa_? It was an eye-opener that lead me into reading a good number of books on the subject and engaging with a lot of blacks of the trend. It's a trend that's epidemic in the Black community. Many aren't even aware that in some communities it's considered fact that some of the great Greek philosophers were Black, that the Egyptians were a Black race and numerous other historical and biological fallacies. I think there likely is a good probability that Obama has some roots--or at least is very familiar with--radical Afrocentrism. For a shocking example of what is taught in some schools, check out: http://www.csicop.org/si/9201/minority.html
[FairfieldLife] Re: Gee, Louis, looks like Obama no longer likes Wright
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning no_reply@ wrote: Frankly, I like that Obama has a Rev Wright. I wish the crudeness of current American politics did not force him to disown the good Rev. Straight talking, perhaps emphatic, even hypebole-driven connections can be balancing, invigorating and insightful. I hope Barack keeps Wright as part of a transparent brain-trust and kitchen cabinet. Oh, yes. By all means keep the fellow who actually believes that AIDS was created by the White Man specifically to commit genocide against African-Americans as part of the Brain-Trust to advise the President of the United States. And sitting next to Wright at the Cabinet Table we should also have Soupy Sales and Pee-Wee Herman. Great idea. Since they already sit on the Board of the Heartland Institute. And why not Charles Manson for National Security Advisor? Politics today is so afraid of speaking something resembling the truth. Its largely pandering. Few want to be told that we have responsibilities, we have blames, we have burdens. America is not the great shining knight of righteousness that it could have been. It has goodness. And a lot of baggage, corruption, weak thinking and calloused hearts. I think Lincoln and Jefferson would weep at viewing today's America. Wright is a force, not alone, but one of many, together that can help steer us back to the highest form of the American Spirit. I hope Barack keeps the door open to Wright. If he doesn't, he is less different than Hill than I would like to believe. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Angela Mailander mailander111@ wrote: Louis, I do not like the tone of the subject heading at all. Seems awfully petty to me, seems like some folks are trying to make you look bad for having admired the wrong man. A phrase like, Whose side are you on? is particularly stupid. This is not a matter of taking sides. So please just ignore those comments. Consider their source. a --- Louis McKenzie ltm457@ wrote: I dont understand what is going on or why? Wright maybe working with the Clintons. Or it may be something to keep people from dropping off. I cant tell. shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@ wrote: What to do, Louis? You've expressed your admiration for BOTH Rev. Wright and Sen. Obama. Yet now Sen. Obama has REALLY distanced himself from the good reverend: http://tinyurl.com/3kcnbb Whose side are you on? To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!'Yahoo! Groups Links - Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
[FairfieldLife] Re: Gee, Louis, looks like Obama no longer likes Wright
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Angela Mailander [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I also agree with much that he has said, including the outrageous possibility that AIDS was a deliberate depopulation attempt. NYTimes: In the appearances, Mr. Wright has suggested that the United States was attacked because it engaged in terrorism on other people and that the government was capable of having used the AIDS virus to commit genocide against minorities. I understood the comment on AIDS as the times reported: the government was capable of having used the AIDS virus Is/ Was the government capable of that? They were capable of immoral experimentation of Montrealers for 30 years. They were capable of Tuskegee. They were capable of firebombing SOLELY civilian populations killing 100,000's in single evenings to 'break the will of those nations' (Which appears to be the largerst and most horrendous acts of Terroroism yet -- making 911 look like kids stuff.) While the government was capable of having used the AIDS virus may border on hyperbole, I think hyperbole from varied sources, in certain doses, can be insightful. Most are smart and independent enough to take things with a grin of salt. But the underlying message that the government has and continues to do mass immoral things -- and that this makes us vulnerable is a correct and powerful take-away. I was in China during the SAARS epidemic and I'm convinced that the SAARS epidemic was a man-made virus. There was solid evidence for that, so the notion that someone could do that is not unthinkable. Besides, there was the Tuskegee thing. And here's another that people generally don't know about. My mother was forced into working for the Americans after the war as a secret agent getting Nazi scientist out of East Germany and to America where they continued doing what they had been doing, including medical experiments on human beings. Of course you can guess what color most of those human beings were, can't you? --- Louis McKenzie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Doesn't matter I still agree with a lot of what he has said. I just dont know who he is aligned with ... I do believe Obama should have just left it alone. But people do what they do. His time at the NPC was lite hearted playing he looked more like a clown than anything else he definitely did not appear to be Anti American his opinions are just that opinions. WHY IS THAT NOT ACCEPTABLE Pat Robertson has opinions no one is denouncing him Angela Mailander [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Louis, I do not like the tone of the subject heading at all. Seems awfully petty to me, seems like some folks are trying to make you look bad for having admired the wrong man. A phrase like, Whose side are you on? is particularly stupid. This is not a matter of taking sides. So please just ignore those comments. Consider their source. a --- Louis McKenzie wrote: I dont understand what is going on or why? Wright maybe working with the Clintons. Or it may be something to keep people from dropping off. I cant tell. shempmcgurk wrote: What to do, Louis? You've expressed your admiration for BOTH Rev. Wright and Sen. Obama. Yet now Sen. Obama has REALLY distanced himself from the good reverend: http://tinyurl.com/3kcnbb Whose side are you on? To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!'Yahoo! Groups Links - Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!'Yahoo! Groups Links - Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
[FairfieldLife] Re: Gee, Louis, looks like Obama no longer likes Wright
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, John jr_esq@ wrote: I have Obama's jyotish chart. His pastor or guru is represented by a malefic Mercury. Mercury is the lord of the 64th navamsha. As such, it very likely that this pastor will seriously damage Obama's chances of getting the Democratic nomination. Wright's Jyotish chart notes that he's black, too. If you read enough into it, that is... Meant to type 'Obama' there, not 'Wright,' but whatever... I tell you...the only thing that makes me roll my eyes in disbelief and horror more than people believing in Jyotish and astrology is their seemingly unshakable belief that a person's pastor of choice holds some kind of sway over them, or is a huge influence in their lives. Duh...guys! That's cultthink. That's you remembering all the times YOU did stupid things because Maharishi or some other guru told you to. Normal people don't DO that. They're smarter than that. In this respect, Barack Obama strikes me as pretty damned normal. The problem is not who a candidate chooses to hang with. It's the belief in others that these people, whoever they are, exert an undue influence on the candidate's thinking and decisions. I have a strong suspicion that if you did a study, the people who are most wary of Obama's association with Wright have a history *themselves* of doing what other people tell them to do, rather than thinking for themselves. So they assume that Obama is the same way. I don't see that in the man's life. I see him as a refreshingly normal human being in a country filled with sheep. The sheep can't *get through the day* without being told what to do, and so they're constantly looking for the person or persons who tell Obama what to do. Me, I just look at this whole tempest in a pisspot and say Ba. Grow the fuck up. No one needs a guru or a pastor or a self-appointed hall monitor to tell them what to do and what to think and whether it's right or wrong. Everybody always knows. Give me a candidate any day who knows *this*. Barry, get a hold of yourself. You're going into a rant and jumping into conclusions without understanding jyotish and its applications to human life. In jyoish, the house of the guru or the ninth house is very important in that it is the house of bhagya or luck. It is also a house of dharma, meaning the field of moral principles which are needed to guide a human being in this lifetime. In Obama's chart, Mercury is placed in the 10th house of career. Since Mercury is malefic as mentioned in previous post, Mercury will damage Obama's career, which is his work to become the president of the USA. Mercury's negative effects are also pervasive in his navamsha chart, an important chart to verifying the natal chart indicators. There are many other meanings that you are not considering in your criticism of the guru or the ninth house. You need to read up on the basic jyotish principles instead of making sweeping generalizations based on superficial observations. JR
[FairfieldLife] Re: Gee, Louis, looks like Obama no longer likes Wright
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, John jr_esq@ wrote: I have Obama's jyotish chart. His pastor or guru is represented by a malefic Mercury. Mercury is the lord of the 64th navamsha. As such, it very likely that this pastor will seriously damage Obama's chances of getting the Democratic nomination. Wright's Jyotish chart notes that he's black, too. If you read enough into it, that is... Meant to type 'Obama' there, not 'Wright,' but whatever... I tell you...the only thing that makes me roll my eyes in disbelief and horror more than people believing in Jyotish and astrology is their seemingly unshakable belief that a person's pastor of choice holds some kind of sway over them, or is a huge influence in their lives. Duh...guys! That's cultthink. That's you remembering all the times YOU did stupid things because Maharishi or some other guru told you to. Normal people don't DO that. They're smarter than that. In this respect, Barack Obama strikes me as pretty damned normal. The problem is not who a candidate chooses to hang with. It's the belief in others that these people, whoever they are, exert an undue influence on the candidate's thinking and decisions. I have a strong suspicion that if you did a study, the people who are most wary of Obama's association with Wright have a history *themselves* of doing what other people tell them to do, rather than thinking for themselves. So they assume that Obama is the same way. I don't see that in the man's life. I see him as a refreshingly normal human being in a country filled with sheep. The sheep can't *get through the day* without being told what to do, and so they're constantly looking for the person or persons who tell Obama what to do. Me, I just look at this whole tempest in a pisspot and say Ba. Grow the fuck up. No one needs a guru or a pastor or a self-appointed hall monitor to tell them what to do and what to think and whether it's right or wrong. Everybody always knows. Give me a candidate any day who knows *this*. Barry, get a hold of yourself. You're going into a rant and jumping into conclusions without understanding jyotish and its applications to human life. In jyoish, the house of the guru or the ninth house is very important in that it is the house of bhagya or luck. It is also a house of dharma, meaning the field of moral principles which are needed to guide a human being in this lifetime. In Obama's chart, Mercury is placed in the 10th house of career. Since Mercury is malefic as mentioned in previous post, Mercury will damage Obama's career, which is his work to become the president of the USA. Mercury's negative effects are also pervasive in his navamsha chart, an important chart to verifying the natal chart indicators. There are many other meanings that you are not considering in your criticism of the guru or the ninth house. You need to read up on the basic jyotish principles instead of making sweeping generalizations based on superficial observations. I respect your right to believe anything you want. I think you should respect mine. I don't need to do anything. I think that the issue is that you want me to do something, something that brings me around to your point of view. The word for that is evangelism. Selling some- one on your POV. I understand that at the time it feels like a noble task, sharing your knowledge with those who were just not fortunate enough to acquire it the way you were. And it's a real rush. Been there, done that, got far too many T-shirts. You nailed it. My post was a rant. But it was *just* a rant, dude. I wasn't trying to sell it to you as a way of life. You seem to be wanting very badly to sell me Jyotish. I'm not buying. No hard feelings. May the study of Jyotish bring you many joys.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Gee, Louis, looks like Obama no longer likes Wright
I have Obama's jyotish chart. His pastor or guru is represented by a malefic Mercury. Mercury is the lord of the 64th navamsha. As such, it very likely that this pastor will seriously damage Obama's chances of getting the Democratic nomination. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Louis McKenzie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I dont understand what is going on or why? Wright maybe working with the Clintons. Or it may be something to keep people from dropping off. I cant tell. shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What to do, Louis? You've expressed your admiration for BOTH Rev. Wright and Sen. Obama. Yet now Sen. Obama has REALLY distanced himself from the good reverend: http://tinyurl.com/3kcnbb Whose side are you on? To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!'Yahoo! Groups Links - Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Gee, Louis, looks like Obama no longer likes Wright
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What to do, Louis? We could nominate Rev Wright? You've expressed your admiration for BOTH Rev. Wright and Sen. Obama. Yet now Sen. Obama has REALLY distanced himself from the good reverend: http://tinyurl.com/3kcnbb Whose side are you on?
[FairfieldLife] Re: Gee, Louis, looks like Obama no longer likes Wright
Frankly, I like that Obama has a Rev Wright. I wish the crudeness of current American politics did not force him to disown the good Rev. Straight talking, perhaps emphatic, even hypebole-driven connections can be balancing, invigorating and insightful. I hope Barack keeps Wright as part of a transparent brain-trust and kitchen cabinet. Politics today is so afraid of speaking something resembling the truth. Its largely pandering. Few want to be told that we have responsibilities, we have blames, we have burdens. America is not the great shining knight of righteousness that it could have been. It has goodness. And a lot of baggage, corruption, weak thinking and calloused hearts. I think Lincoln and Jefferson would weep at viewing today's America. Wright is a force, not alone, but one of many, together that can help steer us back to the highest form of the American Spirit. I hope Barack keeps the door open to Wright. If he doesn't, he is less different than Hill than I would like to believe. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Angela Mailander [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Louis, I do not like the tone of the subject heading at all. Seems awfully petty to me, seems like some folks are trying to make you look bad for having admired the wrong man. A phrase like, Whose side are you on? is particularly stupid. This is not a matter of taking sides. So please just ignore those comments. Consider their source. a --- Louis McKenzie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I dont understand what is going on or why? Wright maybe working with the Clintons. Or it may be something to keep people from dropping off. I cant tell. shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What to do, Louis? You've expressed your admiration for BOTH Rev. Wright and Sen. Obama. Yet now Sen. Obama has REALLY distanced himself from the good reverend: http://tinyurl.com/3kcnbb Whose side are you on? To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!'Yahoo! Groups Links - Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Gee, Louis, looks like Obama no longer likes Wright
I AGREE new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Frankly, I like that Obama has a Rev Wright. I wish the crudeness of current American politics did not force him to disown the good Rev. Straight talking, perhaps emphatic, even hypebole-driven connections can be balancing, invigorating and insightful. I hope Barack keeps Wright as part of a transparent brain-trust and kitchen cabinet. Politics today is so afraid of speaking something resembling the truth. Its largely pandering. Few want to be told that we have responsibilities, we have blames, we have burdens. America is not the great shining knight of righteousness that it could have been. It has goodness. And a lot of baggage, corruption, weak thinking and calloused hearts. I think Lincoln and Jefferson would weep at viewing today's America. Wright is a force, not alone, but one of many, together that can help steer us back to the highest form of the American Spirit. I hope Barack keeps the door open to Wright. If he doesn't, he is less different than Hill than I would like to believe. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Angela Mailander wrote: Louis, I do not like the tone of the subject heading at all. Seems awfully petty to me, seems like some folks are trying to make you look bad for having admired the wrong man. A phrase like, Whose side are you on? is particularly stupid. This is not a matter of taking sides. So please just ignore those comments. Consider their source. a --- Louis McKenzie wrote: I dont understand what is going on or why? Wright maybe working with the Clintons. Or it may be something to keep people from dropping off. I cant tell. shempmcgurk wrote: What to do, Louis? You've expressed your admiration for BOTH Rev. Wright and Sen. Obama. Yet now Sen. Obama has REALLY distanced himself from the good reverend: http://tinyurl.com/3kcnbb Whose side are you on? To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!'Yahoo! Groups Links - Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!'Yahoo! Groups Links - Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
