[FairfieldLife] Re: The MUM Annual Fund
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Buck dhamiltony2k5@ wrote: Please consider an unrestricted gift of $25, $50, $100 or more to MUM's December fundraising appeal. You'll discover that your generous support will help inspire a new generation to progress, evolve, and grow! Can't they just teach all the pundits to do computer customer service in between programs. And they might be able to sew clothes for Walmart while they are on the phones. This will solve all the movement's money problems and keep those pundits away from the white women. As a further money-saving measure they could just stop preparing meals for the students and instead throw the six uneaten meals King Tony rejects each night there is no such practice in reality, this does not exist. off the balcony to the hungry crowds and let them fight over the offering of prasad. That'd also be more in line with MMY's ideas about the nature of a benevolent monarchy. :-)
[FairfieldLife] Re: The MUM Annual Fund
Donate Now and Make a Difference! ONLINE Donations are accepted online! Your online gift is private and secure. Donate Now! http://www.mum.edu/annualfund.html BY MAIL Make your check payable to MUM Annual Fund and mail your gift to: Development Office Maharishi University of Management 1000 North Fourth Street Fairfield, IA 52557 Please consider an unrestricted gift of $25, $50, $100 or more to MUM's December fundraising appeal. You'll discover that your generous support will help inspire a new generation to progress, evolve, and grow! Your support allows MUM to nurture and develop the next generation of the world's enlightened leaders. Your generosity to the Annual Fund helps us to provide a world-class educational system for our future world leaders. Each tax-deductible donation fuels MUM's efforts to grow Consciousness-BasedSM education and develop an environment where students' inner development brings maximum outer success.
[FairfieldLife] Re: The MUM Annual Fund
Please consider an unrestricted gift of $25, $50, $100 or more to MUM's December fundraising appeal. You'll discover that your generous support will help inspire a new generation to progress, evolve, and grow! Your support allows MUM to nurture and develop the next generation of the world's enlightened leaders. Your generosity to the Annual Fund helps us to provide a world-class educational system for our future world leaders. Each tax-deductible donation fuels MUM's efforts to grow Consciousness-BasedSM education and develop an environment where students' inner development brings maximum outer success.
[FairfieldLife] Re: The MUM Annual Fund
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Buck dhamiltony2k5@... wrote: Please consider an unrestricted gift of $25, $50, $100 or more to MUM's December fundraising appeal. You'll discover that your generous support will help inspire a new generation to progress, evolve, and grow! Can't they just teach all the pundits to do computer customer service in between programs. And they might be able to sew clothes for Walmart while they are on the phones. This will solve all the movement's money problems and keep those pundits away from the white women. Your support allows MUM to nurture and develop the next generation of the world's enlightened leaders. Your generosity to the Annual Fund helps us to provide a world-class educational system for our future world leaders. Each tax-deductible donation fuels MUM's efforts to grow Consciousness-BasedSM education and develop an environment where students' inner development brings maximum outer success.
[FairfieldLife] Re: The MUM Annual Fund
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Buck dhamiltony2k5@ wrote: Please consider an unrestricted gift of $25, $50, $100 or more to MUM's December fundraising appeal. You'll discover that your generous support will help inspire a new generation to progress, evolve, and grow! Can't they just teach all the pundits to do computer customer service in between programs. And they might be able to sew clothes for Walmart while they are on the phones. This will solve all the movement's money problems and keep those pundits away from the white women. As a further money-saving measure they could just stop preparing meals for the students and instead throw the six uneaten meals King Tony rejects each night off the balcony to the hungry crowds and let them fight over the offering of prasad. That'd also be more in line with MMY's ideas about the nature of a benevolent monarchy. :-)
[FairfieldLife] Re: The MUM Annual Fund
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@... wrote: If they find the value of human flesh eating in one of the obscure Kali worship scriptures they can start feeding the pundits to the students. Tastes just like chicken curry! So what do you think about Robin not coming through as you predicted on summing up all this points about my flaws from his 5 posts? After all his dogging me out for not responding to challenges, I was kind of dissapointed in him. My guess is that he gave it a shot and was embarrassed with how lame the list looked stripped of the distracting flourishes. Anyway you get an I told you so on this one.' Here is a video that I know you will enjoy. It has some very subtle points that you will relate to I'm sure. http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1feature=endscreenv=-j8ZMMuu7MU --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Buck dhamiltony2k5@ wrote: Please consider an unrestricted gift of $25, $50, $100 or more to MUM's December fundraising appeal. You'll discover that your generous support will help inspire a new generation to progress, evolve, and grow! Can't they just teach all the pundits to do computer customer service in between programs. And they might be able to sew clothes for Walmart while they are on the phones. This will solve all the movement's money problems and keep those pundits away from the white women. As a further money-saving measure they could just stop preparing meals for the students and instead throw the six uneaten meals King Tony rejects each night off the balcony to the hungry crowds and let them fight over the offering of prasad. That'd also be more in line with MMY's ideas about the nature of a benevolent monarchy. :-)
[FairfieldLife] Re: The MUM Annual Fund
are you pinch-hitting for someone else? --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Buck dhamiltony2k5@ wrote: Please consider an unrestricted gift of $25, $50, $100 or more to MUM's December fundraising appeal. You'll discover that your generous support will help inspire a new generation to progress, evolve, and grow! Can't they just teach all the pundits to do computer customer service in between programs. And they might be able to sew clothes for Walmart while they are on the phones. This will solve all the movement's money problems and keep those pundits away from the white women. Your support allows MUM to nurture and develop the next generation of the world's enlightened leaders. Your generosity to the Annual Fund helps us to provide a world-class educational system for our future world leaders. Each tax-deductible donation fuels MUM's efforts to grow Consciousness-BasedSM education and develop an environment where students' inner development brings maximum outer success.
[FairfieldLife] Re: The MUM Annual Fund
If you do a search you will find one or two of them that use humor to poke fun at the movement. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, futur.musik futur.musik@... wrote: are you pinch-hitting for someone else? --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Buck dhamiltony2k5@ wrote: Please consider an unrestricted gift of $25, $50, $100 or more to MUM's December fundraising appeal. You'll discover that your generous support will help inspire a new generation to progress, evolve, and grow! Can't they just teach all the pundits to do computer customer service in between programs. And they might be able to sew clothes for Walmart while they are on the phones. This will solve all the movement's money problems and keep those pundits away from the white women. Your support allows MUM to nurture and develop the next generation of the world's enlightened leaders. Your generosity to the Annual Fund helps us to provide a world-class educational system for our future world leaders. Each tax-deductible donation fuels MUM's efforts to grow Consciousness-BasedSM education and develop an environment where students' inner development brings maximum outer success.
[FairfieldLife] Re: The MUM Annual Fund
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote: If they find the value of human flesh eating in one of the obscure Kali worship scriptures they can start feeding the pundits to the students. Tastes just like chicken curry! So what do you think about Robin not coming through as you predicted on summing up all this points about my flaws from his 5 posts? After all his dogging me out for not responding to challenges, I was kind of dissapointed in him. Color me not surprised. I expected it. All hat, no cattle. My guess is that he gave it a shot and was embarrassed with how lame the list looked stripped of the distracting flourishes. As if it weren't lame with them included. :-) Anyway you get an I told you so on this one.' AND an encyclical addressed to me as well, trying to taunt me into a head-to-head with him. I wouldn't have noticed it if Vaj hadn't quoted it in one of his posts, but I did find that amusing. Here is a video that I know you will enjoy. It has some very subtle points that you will relate to I'm sure. http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1feature=endscreenv=-j8ZMMuu7MU Nice find. Brilliant analysis. I don't think I've seen better. Given the amount of despair, frustration, resentment, anger, aggressiveness and antisocial behavior we've seen just since this posting week started, there must be an atheist loose among us. :-) Either that or some are feeling a little uppity because they've been rejected for other reasons. They just don't understand. It's not that I and others who no longer bother to read their posts have rejected them. It's just that we're skeptical that they exist. :-) --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Buck dhamiltony2k5@ wrote: Please consider an unrestricted gift of $25, $50, $100 or more to MUM's December fundraising appeal. You'll discover that your generous support will help inspire a new generation to progress, evolve, and grow! Can't they just teach all the pundits to do computer customer service in between programs. And they might be able to sew clothes for Walmart while they are on the phones. This will solve all the movement's money problems and keep those pundits away from the white women. As a further money-saving measure they could just stop preparing meals for the students and instead throw the six uneaten meals King Tony rejects each night off the balcony to the hungry crowds and let them fight over the offering of prasad. That'd also be more in line with MMY's ideas about the nature of a benevolent monarchy. :-)
[FairfieldLife] Re: The MUM Annual Fund
You have utterly disgraced yourself with this post, Curtis. You have crossed the line. I call you a liar and I call you corrupt. The temptation became too much. You lost control here, Curtis, and I now know you. Robin --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote: If they find the value of human flesh eating in one of the obscure Kali worship scriptures they can start feeding the pundits to the students. Tastes just like chicken curry! So what do you think about Robin not coming through as you predicted on summing up all this points about my flaws from his 5 posts? After all his dogging me out for not responding to challenges, I was kind of dissapointed in him. My guess is that he gave it a shot and was embarrassed with how lame the list looked stripped of the distracting flourishes. Anyway you get an I told you so on this one.' Here is a video that I know you will enjoy. It has some very subtle points that you will relate to I'm sure. http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1feature=endscreenv=-j8ZMMuu7MU --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Buck dhamiltony2k5@ wrote: Please consider an unrestricted gift of $25, $50, $100 or more to MUM's December fundraising appeal. You'll discover that your generous support will help inspire a new generation to progress, evolve, and grow! Can't they just teach all the pundits to do computer customer service in between programs. And they might be able to sew clothes for Walmart while they are on the phones. This will solve all the movement's money problems and keep those pundits away from the white women. As a further money-saving measure they could just stop preparing meals for the students and instead throw the six uneaten meals King Tony rejects each night off the balcony to the hungry crowds and let them fight over the offering of prasad. That'd also be more in line with MMY's ideas about the nature of a benevolent monarchy. :-)
[FairfieldLife] Re: The MUM Annual Fund
You have been on quite a tear since Ravi referred to as the messiah of intellectual dishonesty. Hope you get it out of your system. I like you, but you just aren't as nice as you think you are. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@... wrote: If you do a search you will find one or two of them that use humor to poke fun at the movement. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, futur.musik futur.musik@ wrote: are you pinch-hitting for someone else? --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Buck dhamiltony2k5@ wrote: Please consider an unrestricted gift of $25, $50, $100 or more to MUM's December fundraising appeal. You'll discover that your generous support will help inspire a new generation to progress, evolve, and grow! Can't they just teach all the pundits to do computer customer service in between programs. And they might be able to sew clothes for Walmart while they are on the phones. This will solve all the movement's money problems and keep those pundits away from the white women. Your support allows MUM to nurture and develop the next generation of the world's enlightened leaders. Your generosity to the Annual Fund helps us to provide a world-class educational system for our future world leaders. Each tax-deductible donation fuels MUM's efforts to grow Consciousness-BasedSM education and develop an environment where students' inner development brings maximum outer success.
[FairfieldLife] Re: The MUM Annual Fund
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, maskedzebra no_reply@... wrote: You have utterly disgraced yourself with this post, Curtis. You have crossed the line. I call you a liar and I call you corrupt. The temptation became too much. You lost control here, Curtis, and I now know you. Robin So where is the summary? After all the dogging me out casting aspersions for my ignoring certain posters taunts, you are doing the same thing. Summarize the problems you want me to address or admit that you are doing exactly what I have done. Picked your battles here. just like me. I would also appreciate an apology for all the aspersions to my character for doing exactly what you are doing here and you can include one for calling me a liar and being corrupt whatever that means in the context of an internet discussion board. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote: If they find the value of human flesh eating in one of the obscure Kali worship scriptures they can start feeding the pundits to the students. Tastes just like chicken curry! So what do you think about Robin not coming through as you predicted on summing up all this points about my flaws from his 5 posts? After all his dogging me out for not responding to challenges, I was kind of dissapointed in him. My guess is that he gave it a shot and was embarrassed with how lame the list looked stripped of the distracting flourishes. Anyway you get an I told you so on this one.' Here is a video that I know you will enjoy. It has some very subtle points that you will relate to I'm sure. http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1feature=endscreenv=-j8ZMMuu7MU --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Buck dhamiltony2k5@ wrote: Please consider an unrestricted gift of $25, $50, $100 or more to MUM's December fundraising appeal. You'll discover that your generous support will help inspire a new generation to progress, evolve, and grow! Can't they just teach all the pundits to do computer customer service in between programs. And they might be able to sew clothes for Walmart while they are on the phones. This will solve all the movement's money problems and keep those pundits away from the white women. As a further money-saving measure they could just stop preparing meals for the students and instead throw the six uneaten meals King Tony rejects each night off the balcony to the hungry crowds and let them fight over the offering of prasad. That'd also be more in line with MMY's ideas about the nature of a benevolent monarchy. :-)
[FairfieldLife] Re: The MUM Annual Fund
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, futur.musik futur.musik@... wrote: You have been on quite a tear since Ravi referred to as the messiah of intellectual dishonesty. Hope you get it out of your system. I like you, but you just aren't as nice as you think you are. Both the nice thing and the intellectual dishonesty thing are from Judy whom, like Ravi, you parrot. But at least she provides the reasons in specific why she makes her accusations so I can respond. Here you use it content free as another form of poopy pants. Not very nice. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@ wrote: If you do a search you will find one or two of them that use humor to poke fun at the movement. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, futur.musik futur.musik@ wrote: are you pinch-hitting for someone else? --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Buck dhamiltony2k5@ wrote: Please consider an unrestricted gift of $25, $50, $100 or more to MUM's December fundraising appeal. You'll discover that your generous support will help inspire a new generation to progress, evolve, and grow! Can't they just teach all the pundits to do computer customer service in between programs. And they might be able to sew clothes for Walmart while they are on the phones. This will solve all the movement's money problems and keep those pundits away from the white women. Your support allows MUM to nurture and develop the next generation of the world's enlightened leaders. Your generosity to the Annual Fund helps us to provide a world-class educational system for our future world leaders. Each tax-deductible donation fuels MUM's efforts to grow Consciousness-BasedSM education and develop an environment where students' inner development brings maximum outer success.
[FairfieldLife] Re: The MUM Annual Fund
I am in no competition to be nice. Are you? I stand by what I said. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, futur.musik futur.musik@ wrote: You have been on quite a tear since Ravi referred to as the messiah of intellectual dishonesty. Hope you get it out of your system. I like you, but you just aren't as nice as you think you are. Both the nice thing and the intellectual dishonesty thing are from Judy whom, like Ravi, you parrot. But at least she provides the reasons in specific why she makes her accusations so I can respond. Here you use it content free as another form of poopy pants. Not very nice. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@ wrote: If you do a search you will find one or two of them that use humor to poke fun at the movement. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, futur.musik futur.musik@ wrote: are you pinch-hitting for someone else? --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Buck dhamiltony2k5@ wrote: Please consider an unrestricted gift of $25, $50, $100 or more to MUM's December fundraising appeal. You'll discover that your generous support will help inspire a new generation to progress, evolve, and grow! Can't they just teach all the pundits to do computer customer service in between programs. And they might be able to sew clothes for Walmart while they are on the phones. This will solve all the movement's money problems and keep those pundits away from the white women. Your support allows MUM to nurture and develop the next generation of the world's enlightened leaders. Your generosity to the Annual Fund helps us to provide a world-class educational system for our future world leaders. Each tax-deductible donation fuels MUM's efforts to grow Consciousness-BasedSM education and develop an environment where students' inner development brings maximum outer success.
[FairfieldLife] Re: The MUM Annual Fund
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@... wrote: Here is a video that I know you will enjoy. It has some very subtle points that you will relate to I'm sure. http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1feature=endscreenv=-j8ZMMuu7MU BTW, did you notice that there is now an *OFFICIAL* Enemies List? Offered with thanks to the person who alerted me to this in email: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/300106 See you at the Troika Party. At least now we've got two women members, so this year's gathering won't seem so much like a stag party. Bring your own party hat and horn; fireworks are optional. :-) --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Buck dhamiltony2k5@ wrote: Please consider an unrestricted gift of $25, $50, $100 or more to MUM's December fundraising appeal. You'll discover that your generous support will help inspire a new generation to progress, evolve, and grow! Can't they just teach all the pundits to do computer customer service in between programs. And they might be able to sew clothes for Walmart while they are on the phones. This will solve all the movement's money problems and keep those pundits away from the white women. As a further money-saving measure they could just stop preparing meals for the students and instead throw the six uneaten meals King Tony rejects each night off the balcony to the hungry crowds and let them fight over the offering of prasad. That'd also be more in line with MMY's ideas about the nature of a benevolent monarchy. :-)
[FairfieldLife] Re: The MUM Annual Fund
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@ wrote: Here is a video that I know you will enjoy. It has some very subtle points that you will relate to I'm sure. http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1feature=endscreenv=-j8ZMMuu7MU BTW, did you notice that there is now an *OFFICIAL* Enemies List? Offered with thanks to the person who alerted me to this in email: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/300106 See you at the Troika Party. At least now we've got two women members, so this year's gathering won't seem so much like a stag party. Bring your own party hat and horn; fireworks are optional. :-) Yeah, I remember seeing that. I was gunna say something but I figure that as long as he keeps posting videos there is nothing I can say that tops that. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Buck dhamiltony2k5@ wrote: Please consider an unrestricted gift of $25, $50, $100 or more to MUM's December fundraising appeal. You'll discover that your generous support will help inspire a new generation to progress, evolve, and grow! Can't they just teach all the pundits to do computer customer service in between programs. And they might be able to sew clothes for Walmart while they are on the phones. This will solve all the movement's money problems and keep those pundits away from the white women. As a further money-saving measure they could just stop preparing meals for the students and instead throw the six uneaten meals King Tony rejects each night off the balcony to the hungry crowds and let them fight over the offering of prasad. That'd also be more in line with MMY's ideas about the nature of a benevolent monarchy. :-)
[FairfieldLife] Re: The MUM Annual Fund
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@ wrote: Here is a video that I know you will enjoy. It has some very subtle points that you will relate to I'm sure. http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1feature=endscreenv=-j8ZMMuu7MU BTW, did you notice that there is now an *OFFICIAL* Enemies List? Offered with thanks to the person who alerted me to this in email: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/300106 See you at the Troika Party. At least now we've got two women members, so this year's gathering won't seem so much like a stag party. Bring your own party hat and horn; fireworks are optional. :-) Yeah, I remember seeing that. I was gunna say something but I figure that as long as he keeps posting videos there is nothing I can say that tops that. I haven't watched any of them, but I can imagine. As for the Enemies List, I find it interesting. This is pretty much the first time any of this clique have posted in print just exactly who their enemies (and what else could you call people described as bottom of the can, low-vibe, slimeball, idiotic retards on this list) are. But the actual CRIME one has to have committed to end up on this list? That's even more interesting. It's NOT being an outspoken critic of TM, the TMO, Maharishi. That position is filled by the troika of me, you, and Vaj. The CRIME is continuing to be enthralled, enticed and entertained by the troika of the King Baby Barry, the mediocre reviewer, Vaj, the liar and HH Curtis, the messiah of the intellectual dishonesty. The troika -- me, Curtis, and Vaj -- are SO bad that continuing to chat with us or agreeing with us may land you on the Enemies List. You could wind up alongside Steve, Rick, Barry 2, Susan, and Sal. Believe me, guys and gals, you don't want that. Avoid the misery before it comes. Just stop reading anything that the dreaded troika writes, and above all *don't* ever agree with them in public. We'll get by. But *you* really don't want to end up on this Enemies List. Trust me. You could end up having to deal with it for seventeen years.
[FairfieldLife] Re: The MUM Annual Fund
What I said to you [just now], Curtis, cost me something of myself. What you say here costs you nothing. You are, I say it again, an utterly corrupt and dishonest human beingalthough no one will know this. I don't say you are unredeemable; but I say that you know you have committed an act which condemns you in your own conscience. In that five-part post I gave everything I had; I answered minutely and comprehensively everything you had placed before me by way of objection and disagreement. I wrote out of the sincerity of my desire to make things real between us. There were no wasted words. It was an ordeal and a necessity for me to write what I wrote to you. For you to refuse to answer me inside the context within which I gave all of myself, asking me to summarize what I said, is as much to say You say you love me, Robin: you say you have proved your love by you acts. I would like you to now provide me a recipe for that love so I can cook it up with my hard boiled egg this morning. The very fact you could so swiftly write back after I said what I said to you in that first e-mail this morning; this goes to the problem, because you see, Curtis, you made sure *you would never have to pass through any kind of experience which would ask anything of you*. You just wrote back from a place within yourself where you could trivialize and devitalize the passion of what has passed between us since the spring of this year. Curtis, baby, are you there? Sing me a song; your art must come into this affair. You are making sure it does not. You have failed in your philosophy; you have failed in your music.i mean in this instance of what you are offering up to me. If I had known I would drive you into a moral and psychological cul de sac by that five-part post, I would not have written it. I wrote to you with everything I have in order to do justice to our friendship, or at least the memory of that friendship. No, Curtis: Don't write back. Think about it first. The authority of your charm, your wit, and your probity has been challenged. I want to find you, Curtis, and I am willing to be humiliated and conquered in this intention. But here I must just ask that you not debase yourselfhardly anyone at FFL will realize what is going on. But, as your response to my five-part post clearly demonstrates, you are not ultimately a serious person. Its a little late, but Merry Christmas to you, Curtisfor I remember how much you like Christmas. And thanks for the very beautiful and glorious conversation we had extending over months at FFL. For that I will always be cursed into asking that you not to profane that memory by how you choose to act now. If you like, I will put that five-part post into one post and post it at FFL. Everything fine between us now? I sure hope so. And Season's Greetings to your friend Barry. Who I know, out of devotion to you, will actually be reading this. I take it all back, Curtis: You're right. I am a chckenshit and when I looked over what I wrote there in that five-part post, it was not worth summarizing. Okay, okay: you got me. And I apologize. I will try to be more respectful to my immortal soul once 2012 gets here. If you can weep over the grave of Che-che, you can at least take a moment to contemplate whether I am serious enough here to take my chances with you, Curtis. And I have. Now consider the vertical axis: make this a performance you are proud of, Curtis. You should not have mentioned my name again. But you finally succumbed to the desire, and now you will have to live with the consequences. What consequences, Robin? I say you have not touched me, I say you have insulted me, I say you have wronged me; I say that Barry is prophetic and true in what he said about you. Well, perhaps, Curtis; perhaps. Is your life greater than a five-part post? It just might be. Or would you please like to summarize the main points of your life so I am spared ever having to experience what it was like for you to have lived your life. Robin --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, maskedzebra no_reply@ wrote: You have utterly disgraced yourself with this post, Curtis. You have crossed the line. I call you a liar and I call you corrupt. The temptation became too much. You lost control here, Curtis, and I now know you. Robin So where is the summary? After all the dogging me out casting aspersions for my ignoring certain posters taunts, you are doing the same thing. Summarize the problems you want me to address or admit that you are doing exactly what I have done. Picked your battles here. just like me. I would also appreciate an apology for all the aspersions to my character for doing exactly what you are doing here and you can include one for calling me a liar and being corrupt whatever that means in the context of an internet
[FairfieldLife] Re: The MUM Annual Fund
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, maskedzebra no_reply@... wrote: What I said to you [just now], Curtis, cost me something of myself. What you say here costs you nothing. You are, I say it again, an utterly corrupt and dishonest human beingalthough no one will know this. I don't say you are unredeemable; but I say that you know you have committed an act which condemns you in your own conscience. In that five-part post I gave everything I had; I answered minutely and comprehensively everything you had placed before me by way of objection and disagreement. I wrote out of the sincerity of my desire to make things real between us. There were no wasted words. It was an ordeal and a necessity for me to write what I wrote to you. For you to refuse to answer me inside the context within which I gave all of myself, asking me to summarize what I said, is as much to say You say you love me, Robin: you say you have proved your love by you acts. I would like you to now provide me a recipe for that love so I can cook it up with my hard boiled egg this morning. The very fact you could so swiftly write back after I said what I said to you in that first e-mail this morning; this goes to the problem, because you see, Curtis, you made sure *you would never have to pass through any kind of experience which would ask anything of you*. You just wrote back from a place within yourself where you could trivialize and devitalize the passion of what has passed between us since the spring of this year. Curtis, baby, are you there? Sing me a song; your art must come into this affair. You are making sure it does not. You have failed in your philosophy; you have failed in your music.i mean in this instance of what you are offering up to me. If I had known I would drive you into a moral and psychological cul de sac by that five-part post, I would not have written it. I wrote to you with everything I have in order to do justice to our friendship, or at least the memory of that friendship. No, Curtis: Don't write back. Think about it first. The authority of your charm, your wit, and your probity has been challenged. I want to find you, Curtis, and I am willing to be humiliated and conquered in this intention. But here I must just ask that you not debase yourselfhardly anyone at FFL will realize what is going on. But, as your response to my five-part post clearly demonstrates, you are not ultimately a serious person. Its a little late, but Merry Christmas to you, Curtisfor I remember how much you like Christmas. And thanks for the very beautiful and glorious conversation we had extending over months at FFL. For that I will always be cursed into asking that you not to profane that memory by how you choose to act now. If you like, I will put that five-part post into one post and post it at FFL. Everything fine between us now? I sure hope so. And Season's Greetings to your friend Barry. Who I know, out of devotion to you, will actually be reading this. I take it all back, Curtis: You're right. I am a chckenshit and when I looked over what I wrote there in that five-part post, it was not worth summarizing. Okay, okay: you got me. And I apologize. I will try to be more respectful to my immortal soul once 2012 gets here. If you can weep over the grave of Che-che, you can at least take a moment to contemplate whether I am serious enough here to take my chances with you, Curtis. And I have. Now consider the vertical axis: make this a performance you are proud of, Curtis. You should not have mentioned my name again. But you finally succumbed to the desire, and now you will have to live with the consequences. What consequences, Robin? I say you have not touched me, I say you have insulted me, I say you have wronged me; I say that Barry is prophetic and true in what he said about you. Well, perhaps, Curtis; perhaps. Is your life greater than a five-part post? It just might be. Or would you please like to summarize the main points of your life so I am spared ever having to experience what it was like for you to have lived your life. Robin --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, maskedzebra no_reply@ wrote: You have utterly disgraced yourself with this post, Curtis. You have crossed the line. I call you a liar and I call you corrupt. The temptation became too much. You lost control here, Curtis, and I now know you. Robin So where is the summary? After all the dogging me out casting aspersions for my ignoring certain posters taunts, you are doing the same thing. Summarize the problems you want me to address or admit that you are doing exactly what I have done. Picked your battles here. just like me. I would also appreciate an apology for all the aspersions to my
[FairfieldLife] Re: The MUM Annual Fund
I am just really curious: How do you reconcile the paranoia and fear thrill you get from being spoken of negatively, and the positively rapturous, orgasmic ecstasy you feel from being paid attention to? Here you appear to brush aside on the one hand, all of those here who find you a gnat, by the greater glory of seeing your name mentioned, again and again and again. Do you lock yourself in the bathroom, or wait 'til you get to Starbucks to read all of the posts on your *Do*Not*Read*List*, or are your roomies hip to your hypocrisy? --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@ wrote: Here is a video that I know you will enjoy. It has some very subtle points that you will relate to I'm sure. http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1feature=endscreenv=-j8ZMMuu7MU BTW, did you notice that there is now an *OFFICIAL* Enemies List? Offered with thanks to the person who alerted me to this in email: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/300106 See you at the Troika Party. At least now we've got two women members, so this year's gathering won't seem so much like a stag party. Bring your own party hat and horn; fireworks are optional. :-) --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Buck dhamiltony2k5@ wrote: Please consider an unrestricted gift of $25, $50, $100 or more to MUM's December fundraising appeal. You'll discover that your generous support will help inspire a new generation to progress, evolve, and grow! Can't they just teach all the pundits to do computer customer service in between programs. And they might be able to sew clothes for Walmart while they are on the phones. This will solve all the movement's money problems and keep those pundits away from the white women. As a further money-saving measure they could just stop preparing meals for the students and instead throw the six uneaten meals King Tony rejects each night off the balcony to the hungry crowds and let them fight over the offering of prasad. That'd also be more in line with MMY's ideas about the nature of a benevolent monarchy. :-)
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The MUM Annual Fund
Barry, are you sure it's the do not read list? I think it may be the do not respond list - safer that way, isn't it? From: turquoiseb no_re...@yahoogroups.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, December 31, 2011 8:42 AM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: The MUM Annual Fund --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote: If they find the value of human flesh eating in one of the obscure Kali worship scriptures they can start feeding the pundits to the students. Tastes just like chicken curry! So what do you think about Robin not coming through as you predicted on summing up all this points about my flaws from his 5 posts? After all his dogging me out for not responding to challenges, I was kind of dissapointed in him. Color me not surprised. I expected it. All hat, no cattle. My guess is that he gave it a shot and was embarrassed with how lame the list looked stripped of the distracting flourishes. As if it weren't lame with them included. :-) Anyway you get an I told you so on this one.' AND an encyclical addressed to me as well, trying to taunt me into a head-to-head with him. I wouldn't have noticed it if Vaj hadn't quoted it in one of his posts, but I did find that amusing. Here is a video that I know you will enjoy. It has some very subtle points that you will relate to I'm sure. http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1feature=endscreenv=-j8ZMMuu7MU Nice find. Brilliant analysis. I don't think I've seen better. Given the amount of despair, frustration, resentment, anger, aggressiveness and antisocial behavior we've seen just since this posting week started, there must be an atheist loose among us. :-) Either that or some are feeling a little uppity because they've been rejected for other reasons. They just don't understand. It's not that I and others who no longer bother to read their posts have rejected them. It's just that we're skeptical that they exist. :-) --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Buck dhamiltony2k5@ wrote: Please consider an unrestricted gift of $25, $50, $100 or more to MUM's December fundraising appeal. You'll discover that your generous support will help inspire a new generation to progress, evolve, and grow! Can't they just teach all the pundits to do computer customer service in between programs. And they might be able to sew clothes for Walmart while they are on the phones. This will solve all the movement's money problems and keep those pundits away from the white women. As a further money-saving measure they could just stop preparing meals for the students and instead throw the six uneaten meals King Tony rejects each night off the balcony to the hungry crowds and let them fight over the offering of prasad. That'd also be more in line with MMY's ideas about the nature of a benevolent monarchy. :-)
[FairfieldLife] Re: The MUM Annual Fund
Or to be completely precise, it is the do not respond openly list. Privately kicking those two adorable mutts of his doesn't count, as they cannot tell anyone... --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn emilymae.reyn@... wrote: Barry, are you sure it's the do not read list?  I think it may be the do not respond list - safer that way, isn't it? From: turquoiseb no_re...@yahoogroups.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, December 31, 2011 8:42 AM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: The MUM Annual Fund  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote: If they find the value of human flesh eating in one of the obscure Kali worship scriptures they can start feeding the pundits to the students. Tastes just like chicken curry! So what do you think about Robin not coming through as you predicted on summing up all this points about my flaws from his 5 posts? After all his dogging me out for not responding to challenges, I was kind of dissapointed in him. Color me not surprised. I expected it. All hat, no cattle. My guess is that he gave it a shot and was embarrassed with how lame the list looked stripped of the distracting flourishes. As if it weren't lame with them included. :-) Anyway you get an I told you so on this one.' AND an encyclical addressed to me as well, trying to taunt me into a head-to-head with him. I wouldn't have noticed it if Vaj hadn't quoted it in one of his posts, but I did find that amusing. Here is a video that I know you will enjoy. It has some very subtle points that you will relate to I'm sure. http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1feature=endscreenv=-j8ZMMuu7MU Nice find. Brilliant analysis. I don't think I've seen better. Given the amount of despair, frustration, resentment, anger, aggressiveness and antisocial behavior we've seen just since this posting week started, there must be an atheist loose among us. :-) Either that or some are feeling a little uppity because they've been rejected for other reasons. They just don't understand. It's not that I and others who no longer bother to read their posts have rejected them. It's just that we're skeptical that they exist. :-) --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Buck dhamiltony2k5@ wrote: Please consider an unrestricted gift of $25, $50, $100 or more to MUM's December fundraising appeal. You'll discover that your generous support will help inspire a new generation to progress, evolve, and grow! Can't they just teach all the pundits to do computer customer service in between programs. And they might be able to sew clothes for Walmart while they are on the phones. This will solve all the movement's money problems and keep those pundits away from the white women. As a further money-saving measure they could just stop preparing meals for the students and instead throw the six uneaten meals King Tony rejects each night off the balcony to the hungry crowds and let them fight over the offering of prasad. That'd also be more in line with MMY's ideas about the nature of a benevolent monarchy. :-)
[FairfieldLife] Re: The MUM Annual Fund
What's funny is that Curtis is the most forthcoming person and would graciously list his own flaws if but asked. And he would be as devastating as ever with his insight. Curtis, babe, they loves yalookit the attention! Edg --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, futur.musik futur.musik@... wrote: Or to be completely precise, it is the do not respond openly list. Privately kicking those two adorable mutts of his doesn't count, as they cannot tell anyone... --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn emilymae.reyn@ wrote: Barry, are you sure it's the do not read list?  I think it may be the do not respond list - safer that way, isn't it? From: turquoiseb no_re...@yahoogroups.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, December 31, 2011 8:42 AM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: The MUM Annual Fund  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote: If they find the value of human flesh eating in one of the obscure Kali worship scriptures they can start feeding the pundits to the students. Tastes just like chicken curry! So what do you think about Robin not coming through as you predicted on summing up all this points about my flaws from his 5 posts? After all his dogging me out for not responding to challenges, I was kind of dissapointed in him. Color me not surprised. I expected it. All hat, no cattle. My guess is that he gave it a shot and was embarrassed with how lame the list looked stripped of the distracting flourishes. As if it weren't lame with them included. :-) Anyway you get an I told you so on this one.' AND an encyclical addressed to me as well, trying to taunt me into a head-to-head with him. I wouldn't have noticed it if Vaj hadn't quoted it in one of his posts, but I did find that amusing. Here is a video that I know you will enjoy. It has some very subtle points that you will relate to I'm sure. http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1feature=endscreenv=-j8ZMMuu7MU Nice find. Brilliant analysis. I don't think I've seen better. Given the amount of despair, frustration, resentment, anger, aggressiveness and antisocial behavior we've seen just since this posting week started, there must be an atheist loose among us. :-) Either that or some are feeling a little uppity because they've been rejected for other reasons. They just don't understand. It's not that I and others who no longer bother to read their posts have rejected them. It's just that we're skeptical that they exist. :-) --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Buck dhamiltony2k5@ wrote: Please consider an unrestricted gift of $25, $50, $100 or more to MUM's December fundraising appeal. You'll discover that your generous support will help inspire a new generation to progress, evolve, and grow! Can't they just teach all the pundits to do computer customer service in between programs. And they might be able to sew clothes for Walmart while they are on the phones. This will solve all the movement's money problems and keep those pundits away from the white women. As a further money-saving measure they could just stop preparing meals for the students and instead throw the six uneaten meals King Tony rejects each night off the balcony to the hungry crowds and let them fight over the offering of prasad. That'd also be more in line with MMY's ideas about the nature of a benevolent monarchy. :-)
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The MUM Annual Fund
On Dec 31, 2011, at 11:08 AM, curtisdeltablues wrote: Here is a video that I know you will enjoy. It has some very subtle points that you will relate to I'm sure. http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1feature=endscreenv=-j8ZMMuu7MU I really think this is the best blanket answer to Robindra's Five Encyclicals to Curtis. Robindra, please view this.
[FairfieldLife] Re: The MUM Annual Fund
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, futur.musik futur.musik@... wrote: Or to be completely precise, it is the do not respond openly list. Privately kicking those two adorable mutts of his doesn't count, as they cannot tell anyone... Well, it's actually Respond openly but in a separate thread, and refer to the people you're pretending not to respond to without naming them, referring to them as 'Some on FFL...' or a similar euphemism. Of course, he may be kicking his mutts too, to pump himself up for the post he's about to write. You know, infusing himself with what's called Dutch courage, except using his dogs. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn emilymae.reyn@ wrote: Barry, are you sure it's the do not read list?  I think it may be the do not respond list - safer that way, isn't it? From: turquoiseb no_re...@yahoogroups.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, December 31, 2011 8:42 AM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: The MUM Annual Fund  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote: If they find the value of human flesh eating in one of the obscure Kali worship scriptures they can start feeding the pundits to the students. Tastes just like chicken curry! So what do you think about Robin not coming through as you predicted on summing up all this points about my flaws from his 5 posts? After all his dogging me out for not responding to challenges, I was kind of dissapointed in him. Color me not surprised. I expected it. All hat, no cattle. My guess is that he gave it a shot and was embarrassed with how lame the list looked stripped of the distracting flourishes. As if it weren't lame with them included. :-) Anyway you get an I told you so on this one.' AND an encyclical addressed to me as well, trying to taunt me into a head-to-head with him. I wouldn't have noticed it if Vaj hadn't quoted it in one of his posts, but I did find that amusing. Here is a video that I know you will enjoy. It has some very subtle points that you will relate to I'm sure. http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1feature=endscreenv=-j8ZMMuu7MU Nice find. Brilliant analysis. I don't think I've seen better. Given the amount of despair, frustration, resentment, anger, aggressiveness and antisocial behavior we've seen just since this posting week started, there must be an atheist loose among us. :-) Either that or some are feeling a little uppity because they've been rejected for other reasons. They just don't understand. It's not that I and others who no longer bother to read their posts have rejected them. It's just that we're skeptical that they exist. :-)
[FairfieldLife] Re: The MUM Annual Fund
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, futur.musik futur.musik@... wrote: Or to be completely precise, it is the do not respond openly list. Privately kicking those two adorable mutts of his doesn't count, as they cannot tell anyone... First Curtis (pretty nasty stuff) and now Barry. Are you having a bad morning? Feels like a pirana feeding frenzy going on. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn emilymae.reyn@ wrote: Barry, are you sure it's the do not read list?  I think it may be the do not respond list - safer that way, isn't it? From: turquoiseb no_re...@yahoogroups.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, December 31, 2011 8:42 AM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: The MUM Annual Fund  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote: If they find the value of human flesh eating in one of the obscure Kali worship scriptures they can start feeding the pundits to the students. Tastes just like chicken curry! So what do you think about Robin not coming through as you predicted on summing up all this points about my flaws from his 5 posts? After all his dogging me out for not responding to challenges, I was kind of dissapointed in him. Color me not surprised. I expected it. All hat, no cattle. My guess is that he gave it a shot and was embarrassed with how lame the list looked stripped of the distracting flourishes. As if it weren't lame with them included. :-) Anyway you get an I told you so on this one.' AND an encyclical addressed to me as well, trying to taunt me into a head-to-head with him. I wouldn't have noticed it if Vaj hadn't quoted it in one of his posts, but I did find that amusing. Here is a video that I know you will enjoy. It has some very subtle points that you will relate to I'm sure. http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1feature=endscreenv=-j8ZMMuu7MU Nice find. Brilliant analysis. I don't think I've seen better. Given the amount of despair, frustration, resentment, anger, aggressiveness and antisocial behavior we've seen just since this posting week started, there must be an atheist loose among us. :-) Either that or some are feeling a little uppity because they've been rejected for other reasons. They just don't understand. It's not that I and others who no longer bother to read their posts have rejected them. It's just that we're skeptical that they exist. :-) --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Buck dhamiltony2k5@ wrote: Please consider an unrestricted gift of $25, $50, $100 or more to MUM's December fundraising appeal. You'll discover that your generous support will help inspire a new generation to progress, evolve, and grow! Can't they just teach all the pundits to do computer customer service in between programs. And they might be able to sew clothes for Walmart while they are on the phones. This will solve all the movement's money problems and keep those pundits away from the white women. As a further money-saving measure they could just stop preparing meals for the students and instead throw the six uneaten meals King Tony rejects each night off the balcony to the hungry crowds and let them fight over the offering of prasad. That'd also be more in line with MMY's ideas about the nature of a benevolent monarchy. :-)
[FairfieldLife] Re: The MUM Annual Fund
-- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung no_reply@... wrote: What's funny is that Curtis is the most forthcoming person and would graciously list his own flaws if but asked. And he would be as devastating as ever with his insight. Curtis, babe, they loves yalookit the attention! Edg I categorically deny having any flaws despite what Edg says. But being the model of perfection, of course I would list them so that others here, wiser than myself, could cure me of my flaws. But check this out Edg being a citizen of cyber-world. I got the dreaded zeroaccess rootkit asura and have been fighting it for weeks. But I found a resource that restores your faith in humanity. http://spywareinfoforum.com/ A supergeek warrior at this site worked with me for free running all manor of diagnostic and cleansing programs to rid myself of this menace. A saint in France took his time over the holidays to help another cyber-traveler destroy the demons! I got the referral from Mcafee who failed me and wanted to charge me 90 large to have them help me. I learned so much working with this anonymous good Samaritan. There are good folks in the world and you are one of them. Happy New Year brother. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, futur.musik futur.musik@ wrote: Or to be completely precise, it is the do not respond openly list. Privately kicking those two adorable mutts of his doesn't count, as they cannot tell anyone... --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn emilymae.reyn@ wrote: Barry, are you sure it's the do not read list?  I think it may be the do not respond list - safer that way, isn't it? From: turquoiseb no_re...@yahoogroups.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, December 31, 2011 8:42 AM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: The MUM Annual Fund  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote: If they find the value of human flesh eating in one of the obscure Kali worship scriptures they can start feeding the pundits to the students. Tastes just like chicken curry! So what do you think about Robin not coming through as you predicted on summing up all this points about my flaws from his 5 posts? After all his dogging me out for not responding to challenges, I was kind of dissapointed in him. Color me not surprised. I expected it. All hat, no cattle. My guess is that he gave it a shot and was embarrassed with how lame the list looked stripped of the distracting flourishes. As if it weren't lame with them included. :-) Anyway you get an I told you so on this one.' AND an encyclical addressed to me as well, trying to taunt me into a head-to-head with him. I wouldn't have noticed it if Vaj hadn't quoted it in one of his posts, but I did find that amusing. Here is a video that I know you will enjoy. It has some very subtle points that you will relate to I'm sure. http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1feature=endscreenv=-j8ZMMuu7MU Nice find. Brilliant analysis. I don't think I've seen better. Given the amount of despair, frustration, resentment, anger, aggressiveness and antisocial behavior we've seen just since this posting week started, there must be an atheist loose among us. :-) Either that or some are feeling a little uppity because they've been rejected for other reasons. They just don't understand. It's not that I and others who no longer bother to read their posts have rejected them. It's just that we're skeptical that they exist. :-) --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Buck dhamiltony2k5@ wrote: Please consider an unrestricted gift of $25, $50, $100 or more to MUM's December fundraising appeal. You'll discover that your generous support will help inspire a new generation to progress, evolve, and grow! Can't they just teach all the pundits to do computer customer service in between programs. And they might be able to sew clothes for Walmart while they are on the phones. This will solve all the movement's money problems and keep those pundits away from the white women. As a further money-saving measure they could just stop preparing meals for the students and instead throw the six uneaten meals King Tony rejects each night off the balcony to the hungry crowds and let them fight over the offering of prasad. That'd also be more in line with MMY's ideas about the nature of a benevolent monarchy. :-)
[FairfieldLife] Re: The MUM Annual Fund
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, futur.musik futur.musik@ wrote: You have been on quite a tear since Ravi referred to as the messiah of intellectual dishonesty. Hope you get it out of your system. I like you, but you just aren't as nice as you think you are. Both the nice thing and the intellectual dishonesty thing are from Judy whom, like Ravi, you parrot. Right. Because (claims Curtis, parroting Barry) it's simply not possible that three different people could come independently to the same conclusions about you. Well, four, if you count Robin. But at least she provides the reasons in specific why she makes her accusations so I can respond. Robin has provided even more reasons in specific than I ever have, but you don't seem to want to even *try* to respond to those. Oh, wait, you said you *had* composed a response, but the virus ate it. And then you demanded that Robin boil his five- parter down to the Main Points if he wanted any response at all. See, the dog ate my homework. So if you want me to do the assignment over, Teach, you'll have to make it a lot shorter. And if you don't, I'll run around and tell everybody you've done the same thing I have by...by...ignoring other students' taunts. Yeah, that's it. That nails it. Whaddya mean, 'Huh?'
[FairfieldLife] Re: The MUM Annual Fund
Curtis, If it starts looking like 2012 is going to be 2012, I sure would like to meet you in person before I get crushed by one of the four horses. So, if, say, gold is at $3,000.00 an ounce, I'll figure that thems what knows knows to get when the gettin' is good, and I'll take that as a sign to go into my End of Days plan. The Plan -- isn't complete yet, but meet cyber friends is on the draft list. If you're going to be within 100 miles of me, it's a gotta do lunch thingie, right? Edg --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@... wrote: -- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung no_reply@ wrote: What's funny is that Curtis is the most forthcoming person and would graciously list his own flaws if but asked. And he would be as devastating as ever with his insight. Curtis, babe, they loves yalookit the attention! Edg I categorically deny having any flaws despite what Edg says. But being the model of perfection, of course I would list them so that others here, wiser than myself, could cure me of my flaws. But check this out Edg being a citizen of cyber-world. I got the dreaded zeroaccess rootkit asura and have been fighting it for weeks. But I found a resource that restores your faith in humanity. http://spywareinfoforum.com/ A supergeek warrior at this site worked with me for free running all manor of diagnostic and cleansing programs to rid myself of this menace. A saint in France took his time over the holidays to help another cyber-traveler destroy the demons! I got the referral from Mcafee who failed me and wanted to charge me 90 large to have them help me. I learned so much working with this anonymous good Samaritan. There are good folks in the world and you are one of them. Happy New Year brother. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, futur.musik futur.musik@ wrote: Or to be completely precise, it is the do not respond openly list. Privately kicking those two adorable mutts of his doesn't count, as they cannot tell anyone... --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn emilymae.reyn@ wrote: Barry, are you sure it's the do not read list?  I think it may be the do not respond list - safer that way, isn't it? From: turquoiseb no_re...@yahoogroups.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, December 31, 2011 8:42 AM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: The MUM Annual Fund  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote: If they find the value of human flesh eating in one of the obscure Kali worship scriptures they can start feeding the pundits to the students. Tastes just like chicken curry! So what do you think about Robin not coming through as you predicted on summing up all this points about my flaws from his 5 posts? After all his dogging me out for not responding to challenges, I was kind of dissapointed in him. Color me not surprised. I expected it. All hat, no cattle. My guess is that he gave it a shot and was embarrassed with how lame the list looked stripped of the distracting flourishes. As if it weren't lame with them included. :-) Anyway you get an I told you so on this one.' AND an encyclical addressed to me as well, trying to taunt me into a head-to-head with him. I wouldn't have noticed it if Vaj hadn't quoted it in one of his posts, but I did find that amusing. Here is a video that I know you will enjoy. It has some very subtle points that you will relate to I'm sure. http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1feature=endscreenv=-j8ZMMuu7MU Nice find. Brilliant analysis. I don't think I've seen better. Given the amount of despair, frustration, resentment, anger, aggressiveness and antisocial behavior we've seen just since this posting week started, there must be an atheist loose among us. :-) Either that or some are feeling a little uppity because they've been rejected for other reasons. They just don't understand. It's not that I and others who no longer bother to read their posts have rejected them. It's just that we're skeptical that they exist. :-) --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Buck dhamiltony2k5@ wrote: Please consider an unrestricted gift of $25, $50, $100 or more to MUM's December fundraising appeal. You'll discover that your generous support will help inspire a new generation to progress, evolve, and grow! Can't they just
[FairfieldLife] Re: The MUM Annual Fund
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, futur.musik futur.musik@ wrote: You have been on quite a tear since Ravi referred to as the messiah of intellectual dishonesty. Hope you get it out of your system. I like you, but you just aren't as nice as you think you are. Both the nice thing and the intellectual dishonesty thing are from Judy whom, like Ravi, you parrot. Right. Because (claims Curtis, parroting Barry) it's simply not possible that three different people could come independently to the same conclusions about you. Let me attribute this one to you: Winner of the inadvertent irony award! Well, four, if you count Robin. But at least she provides the reasons in specific why she makes her accusations so I can respond. Robin has provided even more reasons in specific than I ever have, but you don't seem to want to even *try* to respond to those. No Judy I didn't spend hours responding to Robin over the last year. You are so right to nail me for not responding to the last 5. Oh, wait, you said you *had* composed a response, but the virus ate it. And then you demanded that Robin boil his five- parter down to the Main Points if he wanted any response at all. The logs of my battle are on the link of sent to Edg under continuing malware problems in the solved section complete with dates. And no I didn't want to go back and reread how awful I am, a topic that fascinates you with no limit. See, the dog ate my homework. So if you want me to do the assignment over, Teach, you'll have to make it a lot shorter. And if you don't, I'll run around and tell everybody you've done the same thing I have by...by...ignoring other students' taunts. Yeah, that's it. That nails it. Whaddya mean, 'Huh?' Nice to see you reveal how you view relationships here Judy, as if personal challenges have the relationship of a teacher assigning homework from that position of power. You usually hide this assumptive arrogance better. I have a pretty good track record of wading through Robins long posts as you well know Judy. If I wanted him to summarize is points it was for good reasons.
[FairfieldLife] Re: The MUM Annual Fund
Contact me offline anytime. We would have a blast. You know where I am. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung no_reply@... wrote: Curtis, If it starts looking like 2012 is going to be 2012, I sure would like to meet you in person before I get crushed by one of the four horses. So, if, say, gold is at $3,000.00 an ounce, I'll figure that thems what knows knows to get when the gettin' is good, and I'll take that as a sign to go into my End of Days plan. The Plan -- isn't complete yet, but meet cyber friends is on the draft list. If you're going to be within 100 miles of me, it's a gotta do lunch thingie, right? Edg --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@ wrote: -- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung no_reply@ wrote: What's funny is that Curtis is the most forthcoming person and would graciously list his own flaws if but asked. And he would be as devastating as ever with his insight. Curtis, babe, they loves yalookit the attention! Edg I categorically deny having any flaws despite what Edg says. But being the model of perfection, of course I would list them so that others here, wiser than myself, could cure me of my flaws. But check this out Edg being a citizen of cyber-world. I got the dreaded zeroaccess rootkit asura and have been fighting it for weeks. But I found a resource that restores your faith in humanity. http://spywareinfoforum.com/ A supergeek warrior at this site worked with me for free running all manor of diagnostic and cleansing programs to rid myself of this menace. A saint in France took his time over the holidays to help another cyber-traveler destroy the demons! I got the referral from Mcafee who failed me and wanted to charge me 90 large to have them help me. I learned so much working with this anonymous good Samaritan. There are good folks in the world and you are one of them. Happy New Year brother. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, futur.musik futur.musik@ wrote: Or to be completely precise, it is the do not respond openly list. Privately kicking those two adorable mutts of his doesn't count, as they cannot tell anyone... --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn emilymae.reyn@ wrote: Barry, are you sure it's the do not read list?  I think it may be the do not respond list - safer that way, isn't it? From: turquoiseb no_re...@yahoogroups.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, December 31, 2011 8:42 AM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: The MUM Annual Fund  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote: If they find the value of human flesh eating in one of the obscure Kali worship scriptures they can start feeding the pundits to the students. Tastes just like chicken curry! So what do you think about Robin not coming through as you predicted on summing up all this points about my flaws from his 5 posts? After all his dogging me out for not responding to challenges, I was kind of dissapointed in him. Color me not surprised. I expected it. All hat, no cattle. My guess is that he gave it a shot and was embarrassed with how lame the list looked stripped of the distracting flourishes. As if it weren't lame with them included. :-) Anyway you get an I told you so on this one.' AND an encyclical addressed to me as well, trying to taunt me into a head-to-head with him. I wouldn't have noticed it if Vaj hadn't quoted it in one of his posts, but I did find that amusing. Here is a video that I know you will enjoy. It has some very subtle points that you will relate to I'm sure. http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1feature=endscreenv=-j8ZMMuu7MU Nice find. Brilliant analysis. I don't think I've seen better. Given the amount of despair, frustration, resentment, anger, aggressiveness and antisocial behavior we've seen just since this posting week started, there must be an atheist loose among us. :-) Either that or some are feeling a little uppity because they've been rejected for other reasons. They just don't understand. It's not that I and others who no longer bother to read their posts have rejected them. It's just that we're skeptical that they exist. :-) --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Buck dhamiltony2k5@ wrote
[FairfieldLife] Re: The MUM Annual Fund
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Susan wayback71@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, futur.musik futur.musik@ wrote: Or to be completely precise, it is the do not respond openly list. Privately kicking those two adorable mutts of his doesn't count, as they cannot tell anyone... First Curtis (pretty nasty stuff) and now Barry. Are you having a bad morning? Feels like a pirana feeding frenzy going on. Thank you for noticing. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn emilymae.reyn@ wrote: Barry, are you sure it's the do not read list?  I think it may be the do not respond list - safer that way, isn't it? From: turquoiseb no_re...@yahoogroups.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, December 31, 2011 8:42 AM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: The MUM Annual Fund  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote: If they find the value of human flesh eating in one of the obscure Kali worship scriptures they can start feeding the pundits to the students. Tastes just like chicken curry! So what do you think about Robin not coming through as you predicted on summing up all this points about my flaws from his 5 posts? After all his dogging me out for not responding to challenges, I was kind of dissapointed in him. Color me not surprised. I expected it. All hat, no cattle. My guess is that he gave it a shot and was embarrassed with how lame the list looked stripped of the distracting flourishes. As if it weren't lame with them included. :-) Anyway you get an I told you so on this one.' AND an encyclical addressed to me as well, trying to taunt me into a head-to-head with him. I wouldn't have noticed it if Vaj hadn't quoted it in one of his posts, but I did find that amusing. Here is a video that I know you will enjoy. It has some very subtle points that you will relate to I'm sure. http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1feature=endscreenv=-j8ZMMuu7MU Nice find. Brilliant analysis. I don't think I've seen better. Given the amount of despair, frustration, resentment, anger, aggressiveness and antisocial behavior we've seen just since this posting week started, there must be an atheist loose among us. :-) Either that or some are feeling a little uppity because they've been rejected for other reasons. They just don't understand. It's not that I and others who no longer bother to read their posts have rejected them. It's just that we're skeptical that they exist. :-) --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Buck dhamiltony2k5@ wrote: Please consider an unrestricted gift of $25, $50, $100 or more to MUM's December fundraising appeal. You'll discover that your generous support will help inspire a new generation to progress, evolve, and grow! Can't they just teach all the pundits to do computer customer service in between programs. And they might be able to sew clothes for Walmart while they are on the phones. This will solve all the movement's money problems and keep those pundits away from the white women. As a further money-saving measure they could just stop preparing meals for the students and instead throw the six uneaten meals King Tony rejects each night off the balcony to the hungry crowds and let them fight over the offering of prasad. That'd also be more in line with MMY's ideas about the nature of a benevolent monarchy. :-)
[FairfieldLife] Re: The MUM Annual Fund
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@... wrote: snip As for the Enemies List, I find it interesting. This is pretty much the first time any of this clique have posted in print just exactly who their enemies (and what else could you call people described as bottom of the can, low-vibe, slimeball, idiotic retards on this list) are. Sorta like Barry describes the people on *his* enemies list. Of course, he made the names on his enemies list public long ago and repeats them often to make sure nobody forgets who they are. snip The troika -- me, Curtis, and Vaj -- are SO bad that continuing to chat with us or agreeing with us may land you on the Enemies List. You could wind up alongside Steve, Rick, Barry 2, Susan, and Sal. Believe me, guys and gals, you don't want that. Avoid the misery before it comes. Just stop reading anything that the dreaded troika writes, and above all *don't* ever agree with them in public. Sorta like Barry regularly urges everyone to stop reading anything *his* enemies write. Or, alternatively, claims almost nobody is reading what they write already: Few others consider Robin or Judy or Ravi or Jim interesting enough to even *read*.
[FairfieldLife] Re: The MUM Annual Fund
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Susan wayback71@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, futur.musik futur.musik@ wrote: Or to be completely precise, it is the do not respond openly list. Privately kicking those two adorable mutts of his doesn't count, as they cannot tell anyone... First Curtis (pretty nasty stuff) and now Barry. Are you having a bad morning? Feels like a pirana feeding frenzy going on. Thank you for noticing. Ok. But please, no sneaking a peek at those posts of people on your DNR list. How dare you say you don't read them, and then you do sometimes. No one else here ever does that. It is dishonest and it upsets people. : ) --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn emilymae.reyn@ wrote: Barry, are you sure it's the do not read list?  I think it may be the do not respond list - safer that way, isn't it? From: turquoiseb no_re...@yahoogroups.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, December 31, 2011 8:42 AM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: The MUM Annual Fund  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote: If they find the value of human flesh eating in one of the obscure Kali worship scriptures they can start feeding the pundits to the students. Tastes just like chicken curry! So what do you think about Robin not coming through as you predicted on summing up all this points about my flaws from his 5 posts? After all his dogging me out for not responding to challenges, I was kind of dissapointed in him. Color me not surprised. I expected it. All hat, no cattle. My guess is that he gave it a shot and was embarrassed with how lame the list looked stripped of the distracting flourishes. As if it weren't lame with them included. :-) Anyway you get an I told you so on this one.' AND an encyclical addressed to me as well, trying to taunt me into a head-to-head with him. I wouldn't have noticed it if Vaj hadn't quoted it in one of his posts, but I did find that amusing. Here is a video that I know you will enjoy. It has some very subtle points that you will relate to I'm sure. http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1feature=endscreenv=-j8ZMMuu7MU Nice find. Brilliant analysis. I don't think I've seen better. Given the amount of despair, frustration, resentment, anger, aggressiveness and antisocial behavior we've seen just since this posting week started, there must be an atheist loose among us. :-) Either that or some are feeling a little uppity because they've been rejected for other reasons. They just don't understand. It's not that I and others who no longer bother to read their posts have rejected them. It's just that we're skeptical that they exist. :-) --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Buck dhamiltony2k5@ wrote: Please consider an unrestricted gift of $25, $50, $100 or more to MUM's December fundraising appeal. You'll discover that your generous support will help inspire a new generation to progress, evolve, and grow! Can't they just teach all the pundits to do computer customer service in between programs. And they might be able to sew clothes for Walmart while they are on the phones. This will solve all the movement's money problems and keep those pundits away from the white women. As a further money-saving measure they could just stop preparing meals for the students and instead throw the six uneaten meals King Tony rejects each night off the balcony to the hungry crowds and let them fight over the offering of prasad. That'd also be more in line with MMY's ideas about the nature of a benevolent monarchy. :-)
[FairfieldLife] Re: The MUM Annual Fund
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Susan wayback71@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Susan wayback71@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, futur.musik futur.musik@ wrote: Or to be completely precise, it is the do not respond openly list. Privately kicking those two adorable mutts of his doesn't count, as they cannot tell anyone... First Curtis (pretty nasty stuff) and now Barry. Are you having a bad morning? Feels like a pirana feeding frenzy going on. Thank you for noticing. Ok. But please, no sneaking a peek at those posts of people on your DNR list. How dare you say you don't read them, and then you do sometimes. No one else here ever does that. It is dishonest and it upsets people. : ) Everything you could ever possibly need to know about Fairfield Life you can learn from Yahoo's Message View. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn emilymae.reyn@ wrote: Barry, are you sure it's the do not read list?  I think it may be the do not respond list - safer that way, isn't it? From: turquoiseb no_re...@yahoogroups.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, December 31, 2011 8:42 AM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: The MUM Annual Fund  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote: If they find the value of human flesh eating in one of the obscure Kali worship scriptures they can start feeding the pundits to the students. Tastes just like chicken curry! So what do you think about Robin not coming through as you predicted on summing up all this points about my flaws from his 5 posts? After all his dogging me out for not responding to challenges, I was kind of dissapointed in him. Color me not surprised. I expected it. All hat, no cattle. My guess is that he gave it a shot and was embarrassed with how lame the list looked stripped of the distracting flourishes. As if it weren't lame with them included. :-) Anyway you get an I told you so on this one.' AND an encyclical addressed to me as well, trying to taunt me into a head-to-head with him. I wouldn't have noticed it if Vaj hadn't quoted it in one of his posts, but I did find that amusing. Here is a video that I know you will enjoy. It has some very subtle points that you will relate to I'm sure. http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1feature=endscreenv=-j8ZMMuu7MU Nice find. Brilliant analysis. I don't think I've seen better. Given the amount of despair, frustration, resentment, anger, aggressiveness and antisocial behavior we've seen just since this posting week started, there must be an atheist loose among us. :-) Either that or some are feeling a little uppity because they've been rejected for other reasons. They just don't understand. It's not that I and others who no longer bother to read their posts have rejected them. It's just that we're skeptical that they exist. :-) --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Buck dhamiltony2k5@ wrote: Please consider an unrestricted gift of $25, $50, $100 or more to MUM's December fundraising appeal. You'll discover that your generous support will help inspire a new generation to progress, evolve, and grow! Can't they just teach all the pundits to do computer customer service in between programs. And they might be able to sew clothes for Walmart while they are on the phones. This will solve all the movement's money problems and keep those pundits away from the white women. As a further money-saving measure they could just stop preparing meals for the students and instead throw the six uneaten meals King Tony rejects each night off the balcony to the hungry crowds and let them fight over the offering of prasad. That'd also be more in line with MMY's ideas about the nature of a benevolent monarchy. :-)
[FairfieldLife] Re: The MUM Annual Fund
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@ wrote: snip Here is a video that I know you will enjoy. It has some very subtle points that you will relate to I'm sure. http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1feature=endscreenv=-j8ZMMuu7MU Nice find. Brilliant analysis. I don't think I've seen better. Fascinating. Especially the part about how people who feel rejected demonstrate antisocial behavior by saying things such as: Don't call me anymore. I don't wanna talk about this. You have been blocked. - Also interesting, the narrator dude is the only person I've ever heard pronounce Theresa with the th sound. Weird. http://www.howjsay.com/index.php?word=theresa
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The MUM Annual Fund
Now, Barry did not respond to my last post to him, which is fine as there wasn't that much to respond to - it was all my opinion after all. But his very next post was on attention sluts. Given his indirect response style - it wasn't clear to me if that was his response to me. And, then Susan your posts on doesn't anyone have better things to do also alerted me to the fact that, yes, I was at 48 posts for the week, uninteresting to many or not. So, being the sensitive and fear-based soul that I am right now, I decided to take the two points under consideration and back off the on-line processing and in fact, *do* some things that I need to do. So, I actually really appreciated the feedback - whether it was personally directed at me or not and I chose to detach from the messenger. If I choose to listen (not always the case), I can hear better. All that I Am - Jon Schmidt - this piano piece was composed and played by Jon himself and there is a lot to listen to. HAPPY 2012 :) LOVE YA'LL AND HAVE A SPLENDID DAY http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9fAZIQ-vpdw From: turquoiseb no_re...@yahoogroups.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, December 31, 2011 11:19 AM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: The MUM Annual Fund --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Susan wayback71@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, futur.musik futur.musik@ wrote: Or to be completely precise, it is the do not respond openly list. Privately kicking those two adorable mutts of his doesn't count, as they cannot tell anyone... First Curtis (pretty nasty stuff) and now Barry. Are you having a bad morning? Feels like a pirana feeding frenzy going on. Thank you for noticing. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn emilymae.reyn@ wrote: Barry, are you sure it's the do not read list?  I think it may be the do not respond list - safer that way, isn't it? From: turquoiseb no_re...@yahoogroups.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, December 31, 2011 8:42 AM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: The MUM Annual Fund  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote: If they find the value of human flesh eating in one of the obscure Kali worship scriptures they can start feeding the pundits to the students. Tastes just like chicken curry! So what do you think about Robin not coming through as you predicted on summing up all this points about my flaws from his 5 posts? After all his dogging me out for not responding to challenges, I was kind of dissapointed in him. Color me not surprised. I expected it. All hat, no cattle. My guess is that he gave it a shot and was embarrassed with how lame the list looked stripped of the distracting flourishes. As if it weren't lame with them included. :-) Anyway you get an I told you so on this one.' AND an encyclical addressed to me as well, trying to taunt me into a head-to-head with him. I wouldn't have noticed it if Vaj hadn't quoted it in one of his posts, but I did find that amusing. Here is a video that I know you will enjoy. It has some very subtle points that you will relate to I'm sure. http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1feature=endscreenv=-j8ZMMuu7MU Nice find. Brilliant analysis. I don't think I've seen better. Given the amount of despair, frustration, resentment, anger, aggressiveness and antisocial behavior we've seen just since this posting week started, there must be an atheist loose among us. :-) Either that or some are feeling a little uppity because they've been rejected for other reasons. They just don't understand. It's not that I and others who no longer bother to read their posts have rejected them. It's just that we're skeptical that they exist. :-) --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Buck dhamiltony2k5@ wrote: Please consider an unrestricted gift of $25, $50, $100 or more to MUM's December fundraising appeal. You'll discover that your generous support will help inspire a new generation to progress, evolve, and grow! Can't they just teach all the pundits to do computer customer service in between programs. And they might be able to sew clothes for Walmart while they are on the phones. This will solve all the movement's money problems and keep those pundits away from the white women. As a further money-saving measure they could just stop preparing meals for the students and instead throw the six
[FairfieldLife] Re: The MUM Annual Fund
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn emilymae.reyn@... wrote: Now, Barry did not respond to my last post to him, which is fine as there wasn't that much to respond to - it was all my opinion after all. But his very next post was on attention sluts.  Given his indirect response style - it wasn't clear to me if that was his response to me. And, then Susan your posts on doesn't anyone have better things to do also alerted me to the fact that, yes, I was at 48 posts for the week, uninteresting to many or not.  So, being the sensitive and fear-based soul that I am right now, I decided to take the two points under consideration and back off the on-line processing and in fact, *do* some things that I need to do. Me, too. I have spent way too much time today here. I have to read the NYTimes, a luxury. And then, like you, get some things done.  So, I actually really appreciated the feedback - whether it was personally directed at me or not and I chose to detach from the messenger.  If I choose to listen (not always the case), I can hear better. All that I Am - Jon Schmidt - this piano piece was composed and played by Jon himself and there is a lot to listen to. HAPPY 2012 :)  LOVE YA'LL AND HAVE A SPLENDID DAY http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9fAZIQ-vpdw From: turquoiseb no_re...@yahoogroups.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, December 31, 2011 11:19 AM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: The MUM Annual Fund  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Susan wayback71@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, futur.musik futur.musik@ wrote: Or to be completely precise, it is the do not respond openly list. Privately kicking those two adorable mutts of his doesn't count, as they cannot tell anyone... First Curtis (pretty nasty stuff) and now Barry. Are you having a bad morning? Feels like a pirana feeding frenzy going on. Thank you for noticing. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn emilymae.reyn@ wrote: Barry, are you sure it's the do not read list? àI think it may be the do not respond list - safer that way, isn't it? From: turquoiseb no_re...@yahoogroups.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, December 31, 2011 8:42 AM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: The MUM Annual Fund à--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote: If they find the value of human flesh eating in one of the obscure Kali worship scriptures they can start feeding the pundits to the students. Tastes just like chicken curry! So what do you think about Robin not coming through as you predicted on summing up all this points about my flaws from his 5 posts? After all his dogging me out for not responding to challenges, I was kind of dissapointed in him. Color me not surprised. I expected it. All hat, no cattle. My guess is that he gave it a shot and was embarrassed with how lame the list looked stripped of the distracting flourishes. As if it weren't lame with them included. :-) Anyway you get an I told you so on this one.' AND an encyclical addressed to me as well, trying to taunt me into a head-to-head with him. I wouldn't have noticed it if Vaj hadn't quoted it in one of his posts, but I did find that amusing. Here is a video that I know you will enjoy. It has some very subtle points that you will relate to I'm sure. http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1feature=endscreenv=-j8ZMMuu7MU Nice find. Brilliant analysis. I don't think I've seen better. Given the amount of despair, frustration, resentment, anger, aggressiveness and antisocial behavior we've seen just since this posting week started, there must be an atheist loose among us. :-) Either that or some are feeling a little uppity because they've been rejected for other reasons. They just don't understand. It's not that I and others who no longer bother to read their posts have rejected them. It's just that we're skeptical that they exist. :-) --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Buck dhamiltony2k5@ wrote: Please consider an unrestricted gift of $25, $50, $100 or more to MUM's December fundraising appeal. You'll discover that your generous support will help inspire a new generation to progress, evolve, and grow! Can't they just teach all the pundits to do computer customer service in between
[FairfieldLife] Re: The MUM Annual Fund
I found the first 4:10 interesting. Then it jumped to some assumptions that didn't make sense, at least for me. The idea that theists view themselves as God, as therefore have intolerance for atheists? I'm not getting that. Also, the posting of the negative (often violent) comments towards the end of theists towards atheists. Is this supposed to represent the general views that theists have towards athiests? I am sure one can find a block of comments to reinforce any point one wishes to make. And then the monologue at the end. I couldn't really follow all of that either, but he certainly made some blanket statements that I don't feel apply to many, (at least) theists. I get the feeling that atheists love to poke and prod theists. I suppose the big trump card is proof of God's existence. At if one is strictly a rationalist, then I guess you've made your case. On the other hand, there are other faculties of gaining knowledge, or coming to conclusions which may not lend themselves to scientific verification. I think you might say at this point, that this is where our social conditioning comes in. I guess you can always say someting along those lines. But ultimately those who believe in God, or a higher power may not feel the need to justify that belief, or ask others to buy into it. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote: If they find the value of human flesh eating in one of the obscure Kali worship scriptures they can start feeding the pundits to the students. Tastes just like chicken curry! So what do you think about Robin not coming through as you predicted on summing up all this points about my flaws from his 5 posts? After all his dogging me out for not responding to challenges, I was kind of dissapointed in him. My guess is that he gave it a shot and was embarrassed with how lame the list looked stripped of the distracting flourishes. Anyway you get an I told you so on this one.' Here is a video that I know you will enjoy. It has some very subtle points that you will relate to I'm sure. http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1feature=endscreenv=-j8ZMMuu7MU --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Buck dhamiltony2k5@ wrote: Please consider an unrestricted gift of $25, $50, $100 or more to MUM's December fundraising appeal. You'll discover that your generous support will help inspire a new generation to progress, evolve, and grow! Can't they just teach all the pundits to do computer customer service in between programs. And they might be able to sew clothes for Walmart while they are on the phones. This will solve all the movement's money problems and keep those pundits away from the white women. As a further money-saving measure they could just stop preparing meals for the students and instead throw the six uneaten meals King Tony rejects each night off the balcony to the hungry crowds and let them fight over the offering of prasad. That'd also be more in line with MMY's ideas about the nature of a benevolent monarchy. :-)
[FairfieldLife] Re: The MUM Annual Fund
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote: snip See, the dog ate my homework. So if you want me to do the assignment over, Teach, you'll have to make it a lot shorter. And if you don't, I'll run around and tell everybody you've done the same thing I have by...by...ignoring other students' taunts. Yeah, that's it. That nails it. Whaddya mean, 'Huh?' Nice to see you reveal how you view relationships here Judy, as if personal challenges have the relationship of a teacher assigning homework from that position of power. You usually hide this assumptive arrogance better. And you usually hide your dishonesty better. That wasn't the point of the analogy, and you know it. I have a pretty good track record of wading through Robins long posts as you well know Judy. If I wanted him to summarize is points it was for good reasons. Not good enough reasons, however, to have kept you from (according to you) having waded through a response to the full five-parter before the virus ate it. But you did have nasty reasons to propose for why Robin didn't want to summarize it. And you even invited Barry, of all people, to pile on with his own suggestions. Gratuitously, out of the blue. Not in response to anything Robin had said to you or any other related context. Me, I think you've been feeling uncomfortable about not having replied to the five-parter and are trying to put the onus on Robin to make yourself feel better. There's no other conceivable reason you would have launched that attack on him out of nowhere, begging for Barry's reinforcement. Perhaps you were hoping for a reprise of Barry's earlier Robin-has-no-balls explanation for why Robin didn't want to summarize. Too bad Barry didn't oblige, huh? I mean, one beats none, right?
[FairfieldLife] Re: The MUM Annual Fund
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray1 steve.sundur@... wrote: I found the first 4:10 interesting. Then it jumped to some assumptions that didn't make sense, at least for me. The idea that theists view themselves as God, as therefore have intolerance for atheists? I'm not getting that. That puzzled me as well at first, but I think what he meant is that theists are making up their God without realizing it. In which case this God is no different from themselves, since they created it. And therefore when someone doesn't buy this God, the theist feels he or she is being rejected. My guess, anyway.
[FairfieldLife] Re: The MUM Annual Fund
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote: snip See, the dog ate my homework. So if you want me to do the assignment over, Teach, you'll have to make it a lot shorter. And if you don't, I'll run around and tell everybody you've done the same thing I have by...by...ignoring other students' taunts. Yeah, that's it. That nails it. Whaddya mean, 'Huh?' Nice to see you reveal how you view relationships here Judy, as if personal challenges have the relationship of a teacher assigning homework from that position of power. You usually hide this assumptive arrogance better. And you usually hide your dishonesty better. That wasn't the point of the analogy, and you know it. Of course that wasn't your point. But it was an interesting choice that you created. I have a pretty good track record of wading through Robins long posts as you well know Judy. If I wanted him to summarize is points it was for good reasons. Not good enough reasons, however, to have kept you from (according to you) having waded through a response to the full five-parter before the virus ate it. Some of the reasons involve having to go wade through them AGAIN. But you did have nasty reasons to propose for why Robin didn't want to summarize it. And you even invited Barry, of all people, to pile on with his own suggestions. What is so nasty about calling him on this? And Barry did predict it. I thought he was wrong and Robin would have come through, it was not an unreasonable request. Gratuitously, out of the blue. Not in response to anything Robin had said to you or any other related context. Are you really that thick? Me, I think you've been feeling uncomfortable about not having replied to the five-parter and are trying to put the onus on Robin to make yourself feel better. There's no other conceivable reason you would have launched that attack on him out of nowhere, begging for Barry's reinforcement. No other conceivable reason unless you were me. Perhaps you were hoping for a reprise of Barry's earlier Robin-has-no-balls explanation for why Robin didn't want to summarize. Too bad Barry didn't oblige, huh? I mean, one beats none, right? It achieved what I wanted. I wanted Robin to address it, which he did.
[FairfieldLife] Re: The MUM Annual Fund
Ok, that makes more sense. Or at least I better understand the point he was trying to make. Thanks. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray1 steve.sundur@ wrote: I found the first 4:10 interesting. Then it jumped to some assumptions that didn't make sense, at least for me. The idea that theists view themselves as God, as therefore have intolerance for atheists? I'm not getting that. That puzzled me as well at first, but I think what he meant is that theists are making up their God without realizing it. In which case this God is no different from themselves, since they created it. And therefore when someone doesn't buy this God, the theist feels he or she is being rejected. My guess, anyway.
[FairfieldLife] Re: The MUM Annual Fund
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray1 steve.sundur@ wrote: I found the first 4:10 interesting. Then it jumped to some assumptions that didn't make sense, at least for me. The idea that theists view themselves as God, as therefore have intolerance for atheists? I'm not getting that. That puzzled me as well at first, but I think what he meant is that theists are making up their God without realizing it. In which case this God is no different from themselves, since they created it. And therefore when someone doesn't buy this God, the theist feels he or she is being rejected. My guess, anyway. I noticed that too. Probably better for the both of them to go with the more scientific spiritual experience as in, the Unified Field. It is more matter of fact. Yeah, may be the 'god' word is too culturally conflicted a choice of a word for fruitful discussion anyway. Essentially both their situation is that they necessarily reject in that they just don't know the unified field by experience. It isn't that either are god-less necessarily, they just don't know the Unified Field. These people should both learn an effective meditation, get their meditations checked, repent their ways that take them away and spend a little more time in meditation practicing, and activate and align their chakra system. Then they'd see. It's proly a lot less conflicted and safer this way too than arguing religion, as that Youtube clip shows. -Buck in FF
[FairfieldLife] Re: The MUM Annual Fund
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote: snip But you did have nasty reasons to propose for why Robin didn't want to summarize it. And you even invited Barry, of all people, to pile on with his own suggestions. What is so nasty about calling him on this? Are you really that thick? So what do you think about Robin not coming through as you predicted on summing up all this points about my flaws from his 5 posts? After all his dogging me out for not responding to challenges, I was kind of dissapointed in him. My guess is that he gave it a shot and was embarrassed with how lame the list looked stripped of the distracting flourishes. Anyway you get an 'I told you so' on this one. And Barry did predict it. I thought he was wrong and Robin would have come through, it was not an unreasonable request. Gratuitously, out of the blue. Not in response to anything Robin had said to you or any other related context. Are you really that thick? Yes. Explain it to me. Me, I think you've been feeling uncomfortable about not having replied to the five-parter and are trying to put the onus on Robin to make yourself feel better. There's no other conceivable reason you would have launched that attack on him out of nowhere, begging for Barry's reinforcement. No other conceivable reason unless you were me. I'm sure with a little thought you could come up with all kinds of reasons. Perhaps you were hoping for a reprise of Barry's earlier Robin-has-no-balls explanation for why Robin didn't want to summarize. Too bad Barry didn't oblige, huh? I mean, one beats none, right? It achieved what I wanted. I wanted Robin to address it, which he did. How about, Hey, Robin, are you going to do that summary for me or not?
[FairfieldLife] Re: The MUM Annual Fund
BY MAIL Make your check payable to MUM Annual Fund and mail your gift to: Development Office Maharishi University of Management 1000 North Fourth Street Fairfield, IA 52557 Please consider an unrestricted gift of $25, $50, $100 or more to MUM's December fundraising appeal. You'll discover that your generous support will help inspire a new generation to progress, evolve, and grow! Your support allows MUM to nurture and develop the next generation of the world's enlightened leaders. Your generosity to the Annual Fund helps us to provide a world-class educational system for our future world leaders. Each tax-deductible donation fuels MUM's efforts to grow Consciousness-BasedSM education and develop an environment where students' inner development brings maximum outer success.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The MUM Annual Fund
Dear King Baby Barry, You have misunderstood me. I was just saying that you the emotionally damaged, mediocre reviewer; Vaj, the liar, constantly choking on parroted shit; HH Curtis, the messiah of intellectual dishonesty, the adept practitioner of his patented 7 layers of POV based deception progressively cruder, baser and grosser, have a niche audience, mind blowingly mediocre, incredibly idiotic, randomly retarded, the Heartland Retards, the Stupid Sals, the Susan Waybackwards, the Dumbaz Greys. I confess my posts unreasonably demand lot of emotional maturity, intelligence, intuition and heart. I know most posters are too busy to read all posts, family, friends, movies, kids and I cant blame them if they get attracted to you guys's low-vibe, slimeball, parroted, intellectually dishonest posts. No I'm not complaining Barry. I totally understand that 'm doomed to a smaller audience, bad Karma :-). So you guys have fun, OK. Please promise me, OK Barry baby. Much love, Ravi. Thank you, Ravi On Dec 31, 2011, at 9:34 AM, turquoiseb no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@ wrote: Here is a video that I know you will enjoy. It has some very subtle points that you will relate to I'm sure. http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1feature=endscreenv=-j8ZMMuu7MU BTW, did you notice that there is now an *OFFICIAL* Enemies List? Offered with thanks to the person who alerted me to this in email: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/300106 See you at the Troika Party. At least now we've got two women members, so this year's gathering won't seem so much like a stag party. Bring your own party hat and horn; fireworks are optional. :-) Yeah, I remember seeing that. I was gunna say something but I figure that as long as he keeps posting videos there is nothing I can say that tops that. I haven't watched any of them, but I can imagine. As for the Enemies List, I find it interesting. This is pretty much the first time any of this clique have posted in print just exactly who their enemies (and what else could you call people described as bottom of the can, low-vibe, slimeball, idiotic retards on this list) are. But the actual CRIME one has to have committed to end up on this list? That's even more interesting. It's NOT being an outspoken critic of TM, the TMO, Maharishi. That position is filled by the troika of me, you, and Vaj. The CRIME is continuing to be enthralled, enticed and entertained by the troika of the King Baby Barry, the mediocre reviewer, Vaj, the liar and HH Curtis, the messiah of the intellectual dishonesty. The troika -- me, Curtis, and Vaj -- are SO bad that continuing to chat with us or agreeing with us may land you on the Enemies List. You could wind up alongside Steve, Rick, Barry 2, Susan, and Sal. Believe me, guys and gals, you don't want that. Avoid the misery before it comes. Just stop reading anything that the dreaded troika writes, and above all *don't* ever agree with them in public. We'll get by. But *you* really don't want to end up on this Enemies List. Trust me. You could end up having to deal with it for seventeen years.
[FairfieldLife] Re: The MUM Annual Fund
Just my two cents(maybe I'm being generous with that estimate :)), Any discussion of whether god exists or not is invariably problematic due to the difficulty with defining what the word GOD means.Also it seems to me that almost any definition that you used would make it virtually impossible to prove that GOD exists.It would also be next to impossible to PROVE that GOD doesn't exist.IMHO we should as a rule tolerate peoples opinion about whether GOD exists or not.We should not tolerate people who use their opinion about whether GOD exists or not to attempt to control or abuse others.As far as I am concerned whether you believe in GOD or not doesn't usually have a lot to do with whether you are a good person or not.Some of the best people in the world are atheists and some of the worstpeople in the world are believers and vice versa. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray1 steve.sundur@... wrote: I found the first 4:10 interesting. Then it jumped to some assumptions that didn't make sense, at least for me. The idea that theists view themselves as God, as therefore have intolerance for atheists? I'm not getting that. Also, the posting of the negative (often violent) comments towards the end of theists towards atheists. Is this supposed to represent the general views that theists have towards athiests? I am sure one can find a block of comments to reinforce any point one wishes to make. And then the monologue at the end. I couldn't really follow all of that either, but he certainly made some blanket statements that I don't feel apply to many, (at least) theists. I get the feeling that atheists love to poke and prod theists. I suppose the big trump card is proof of God's existence. At if one is strictly a rationalist, then I guess you've made your case. On the other hand, there are other faculties of gaining knowledge, or coming to conclusions which may not lend themselves to scientific verification. I think you might say at this point, that this is where our social conditioning comes in. I guess you can always say someting along those lines. But ultimately those who believe in God, or a higher power may not feel the need to justify that belief, or ask others to buy into it. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote: If they find the value of human flesh eating in one of the obscure Kali worship scriptures they can start feeding the pundits to the students. Tastes just like chicken curry! So what do you think about Robin not coming through as you predicted on summing up all this points about my flaws from his 5 posts? After all his dogging me out for not responding to challenges, I was kind of dissapointed in him. My guess is that he gave it a shot and was embarrassed with how lame the list looked stripped of the distracting flourishes. Anyway you get an I told you so on this one.' Here is a video that I know you will enjoy. It has some very subtle points that you will relate to I'm sure. http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1feature=endscreenv=-j8ZMMuu7MU --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Buck dhamiltony2k5@ wrote: Please consider an unrestricted gift of $25, $50, $100 or more to MUM's December fundraising appeal. You'll discover that your generous support will help inspire a new generation to progress, evolve, and grow! Can't they just teach all the pundits to do computer customer service in between programs. And they might be able to sew clothes for Walmart while they are on the phones. This will solve all the movement's money problems and keep those pundits away from the white women. As a further money-saving measure they could just stop preparing meals for the students and instead throw the six uneaten meals King Tony rejects each night off the balcony to the hungry crowds and let them fight over the offering of prasad. That'd also be more in line with MMY's ideas about the nature of a benevolent monarchy. :-)
[FairfieldLife] Re: The MUM Annual Fund
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shanti2218411 shanti2218411@... wrote: Just my two cents(maybe I'm being generous with that estimate :)) Naah, this is worth at least a nickel. ;-) Well said. You've certainly summarized my attitude. Any discussion of whether god exists or not is invariably problematic due to the difficulty with defining what the word GOD means.Also it seems to me that almost any definition that you used would make it virtually impossible to prove that GOD exists.It would also be next to impossible to PROVE that GOD doesn't exist.IMHO we should as a rule tolerate peoples opinion about whether GOD exists or not.We should not tolerate people who use their opinion about whether GOD exists or not to attempt to control or abuse others.As far as I am concerned whether you believe in GOD or not doesn't usually have a lot to do with whether you are a good person or not.Some of the best people in the world are atheists and some of the worstpeople in the world are believers and vice versa.
[FairfieldLife] Re: The MUM Annual Fund
OMG.. I shouldn't be typing responses while traveling 80 mph along a freeway weaving clueless, dumb holiday drivers. Of course I'm usually a big attention slut, but I got busy today. Apologies to Ms. Susan Waybackward, I know I can't match her level of busybodiness, her friends, family, kids, movies, active social life. I just want to quickly apologize for not addressing His Holiness properly, it should have been His Holiness Gandhi King Curtis, the messiah of intellectual dishonesty, the adept practitioner of his patented 7 layers of POV based deception progressively cruder, baser and grosser. I certainly don't want a Vajihad declared on me by his niche, mind blowingly mediocre, incredibly idiotic and randomly retarded fans !!! Love, Ravi --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@... wrote: Dear King Baby Barry, You have misunderstood me. I was just saying that you the emotionally damaged, mediocre reviewer; Vaj, the liar, constantly choking on parroted shit; HH Curtis, the messiah of intellectual dishonesty, the adept practitioner of his patented 7 layers of POV based deception progressively cruder, baser and grosser, have a niche audience, mind blowingly mediocre, incredibly idiotic, randomly retarded, the Heartland Retards, the Stupid Sals, the Susan Waybackwards, the Dumbaz Greys. I confess my posts unreasonably demand lot of emotional maturity, intelligence, intuition and heart. I know most posters are too busy to read all posts, family, friends, movies, kids and I cant blame them if they get attracted to you guys's low-vibe, slimeball, parroted, intellectually dishonest posts. No I'm not complaining Barry. I totally understand that 'm doomed to a smaller audience, bad Karma :-). So you guys have fun, OK. Please promise me, OK Barry baby. Much love, Ravi. Thank you, Ravi On Dec 31, 2011, at 9:34 AM, turquoiseb no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@ wrote: Here is a video that I know you will enjoy. It has some very subtle points that you will relate to I'm sure. http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1feature=endscreenv=-j8ZMMuu7MU BTW, did you notice that there is now an *OFFICIAL* Enemies List? Offered with thanks to the person who alerted me to this in email: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/300106 See you at the Troika Party. At least now we've got two women members, so this year's gathering won't seem so much like a stag party. Bring your own party hat and horn; fireworks are optional. :-) Yeah, I remember seeing that. I was gunna say something but I figure that as long as he keeps posting videos there is nothing I can say that tops that. I haven't watched any of them, but I can imagine. As for the Enemies List, I find it interesting. This is pretty much the first time any of this clique have posted in print just exactly who their enemies (and what else could you call people described as bottom of the can, low-vibe, slimeball, idiotic retards on this list) are. But the actual CRIME one has to have committed to end up on this list? That's even more interesting. It's NOT being an outspoken critic of TM, the TMO, Maharishi. That position is filled by the troika of me, you, and Vaj. The CRIME is continuing to be enthralled, enticed and entertained by the troika of the King Baby Barry, the mediocre reviewer, Vaj, the liar and HH Curtis, the messiah of the intellectual dishonesty. The troika -- me, Curtis, and Vaj -- are SO bad that continuing to chat with us or agreeing with us may land you on the Enemies List. You could wind up alongside Steve, Rick, Barry 2, Susan, and Sal. Believe me, guys and gals, you don't want that. Avoid the misery before it comes. Just stop reading anything that the dreaded troika writes, and above all *don't* ever agree with them in public. We'll get by. But *you* really don't want to end up on this Enemies List. Trust me. You could end up having to deal with it for seventeen years.
[FairfieldLife] Re: The MUM Annual Fund
Yeah, I enjoy everyone's voice on here, and I get sick of The Dick Swingers as Barry calls his posse, taking the stage. Let's all get a voice! Screw these guys with the same ol' same ol'. So dull and stupid they are. Why don't we explore emotions and spirituality and the transcendent and all things wonderful? Assume all of us to be intelligent thoughtful beings with much to contribute, and stop being victims of our former teachers. Yeah, the dick swingers like Barry are dead. They've gone transparent, and there is nothing wrong with seeing through the veil, especially here on FFL and calling it as seen. Thanks for your feedback - I always enjoy your comments here. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Susan wayback71@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, futur.musik futur.musik@ wrote: Or to be completely precise, it is the do not respond openly list. Privately kicking those two adorable mutts of his doesn't count, as they cannot tell anyone... First Curtis (pretty nasty stuff) and now Barry. Are you having a bad morning? Feels like a pirana feeding frenzy going on. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn emilymae.reyn@ wrote: Barry, are you sure it's the do not read list?  I think it may be the do not respond list - safer that way, isn't it? From: turquoiseb no_re...@yahoogroups.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, December 31, 2011 8:42 AM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: The MUM Annual Fund  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote: If they find the value of human flesh eating in one of the obscure Kali worship scriptures they can start feeding the pundits to the students. Tastes just like chicken curry! So what do you think about Robin not coming through as you predicted on summing up all this points about my flaws from his 5 posts? After all his dogging me out for not responding to challenges, I was kind of dissapointed in him. Color me not surprised. I expected it. All hat, no cattle. My guess is that he gave it a shot and was embarrassed with how lame the list looked stripped of the distracting flourishes. As if it weren't lame with them included. :-) Anyway you get an I told you so on this one.' AND an encyclical addressed to me as well, trying to taunt me into a head-to-head with him. I wouldn't have noticed it if Vaj hadn't quoted it in one of his posts, but I did find that amusing. Here is a video that I know you will enjoy. It has some very subtle points that you will relate to I'm sure. http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1feature=endscreenv=-j8ZMMuu7MU Nice find. Brilliant analysis. I don't think I've seen better. Given the amount of despair, frustration, resentment, anger, aggressiveness and antisocial behavior we've seen just since this posting week started, there must be an atheist loose among us. :-) Either that or some are feeling a little uppity because they've been rejected for other reasons. They just don't understand. It's not that I and others who no longer bother to read their posts have rejected them. It's just that we're skeptical that they exist. :-) --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Buck dhamiltony2k5@ wrote: Please consider an unrestricted gift of $25, $50, $100 or more to MUM's December fundraising appeal. You'll discover that your generous support will help inspire a new generation to progress, evolve, and grow! Can't they just teach all the pundits to do computer customer service in between programs. And they might be able to sew clothes for Walmart while they are on the phones. This will solve all the movement's money problems and keep those pundits away from the white women. As a further money-saving measure they could just stop preparing meals for the students and instead throw the six uneaten meals King Tony rejects each night off the balcony to the hungry crowds and let them fight over the offering of prasad. That'd also be more in line with MMY's ideas about the nature of a benevolent monarchy. :-)
[FairfieldLife] Re: The MUM Annual Fund
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, futur.musik futur.musik@... wrote: Assume all of us to be intelligent thoughtful beings with much to contribute Simply reading one post by Sri Bubba Jim Flanigen refutes this assumption.
[FairfieldLife] Re: The MUM Annual Fund
oops, azgrey farted again... --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, azgrey no_reply@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, futur.musik futur.musik@ wrote: Assume all of us to be intelligent thoughtful beings with much to contribute Simply reading one post by Sri Bubba Jim Flanigen refutes this assumption.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The MUM Annual Fund
Oh Dumbazgrey, why do you humiliate us and yourself with your minute man capabilities and minute man ejaculations? What kind of perverse, sadistic pleasures you derive from this minute filled orgies of yours? Hope 2012 multiplies your minutes !!! Much love, Ravi On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 5:11 PM, azgrey no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote: ** --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, futur.musik futur.musik@... wrote: Assume all of us to be intelligent thoughtful beings with much to contribute Simply reading one post by Sri Bubba Jim Flanigen refutes this assumption.
[FairfieldLife] Re: The MUM Annual Fund
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@... wrote: Oh Dumbazgrey, why do you humiliate us and yourself with your minute man capabilities and minute man ejaculations? What kind of perverse, sadistic pleasures you derive from this minute filled orgies of yours? Hope 2012 multiplies your minutes !!! Much love, Ravi Very Funny !, the new year starts well ! :-) Happy New Year to everyone !
[FairfieldLife] Re: The MUM Annual Fund
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote: snip As for the Enemies List, I find it interesting. This is pretty much the first time any of this clique have posted in print just exactly who their enemies (and what else could you call people described as bottom of the can, low-vibe, slimeball, idiotic retards on this list) are. Sorta like Barry describes the people on *his* enemies list. Of course, he made the names on his enemies list public long ago and repeats them often to make sure nobody forgets who they are. snip The troika -- me, Curtis, and Vaj -- are SO bad that continuing to chat with us or agreeing with us may land you on the Enemies List. You could wind up alongside Steve, Rick, Barry 2, Susan, and Sal. Believe me, guys and gals, you don't want that. Avoid the misery before it comes. Just stop reading anything that the dreaded troika writes, and above all *don't* ever agree with them in public. Sorta like Barry regularly urges everyone to stop reading anything *his* enemies write. Or, alternatively, claims almost nobody is reading what they write already: Few others consider Robin or Judy or Ravi or Jim interesting enough to even *read*. Its a direct thing to say, but I honestly do not think Barry has the emotional maturity to grasp what is being said by these four people much of the time. His incredible distortions and misreads of nearly all of our collective material seems to have a lot more in common with a caveman throwing his spear at the big silver bird, than any attempt at meaningful discourse, or display of comprehension. He is like an idiot savant, who has learned the rules of writing, but has nothing to say, and comprehends little of what is written here. When anything goes beyond the most fundamental common denominator of ideas, he is lost, flailing about uncomfortably and ineptly in a world of grey, looking for the black and white; all spiritual movements are cults, I only read posts from these people and NOT those people, All spiritual teachers are horrible like my parents were, etc, etc, etc. Fundamentalism. The way we used to think as children - no nuance - everything spelled out, lines set, i's dotted and t's crossed. Knowing all the rules; fear based existence. So his solution is to, one, be nasty, much as a teenager can be when confronted with something they know nothing about, two, always polarize the discussion so that a stand can be taken in the absence of any understanding, and three, try to ignore the perceived threat; Barry creates his *Do*Not*Read*List*. So continue to try and get through to him if you will, but similar to Curtis's MNG Curtis, Barry just doesn't have the emotional ability to get what you are trying to get across. He is a child, trying to survive in a hostile and unfriendly grown up world. His actions are always reactions and shadow-boxing. It is why he so enjoys escaping into movies and TV. Everyone is controlled, in a box, recorded already! He can say anything he wants about them. Safe, Safe, Safe! Perhaps go easy on him. I am beginning to soften my own stance, instead of thinking of him as our intellectual and emotional equal, I see him now more compassionately as the village idiot of Fairfield Life. Love you Barry! Simpler is better buddy!
[FairfieldLife] Re: The MUM Annual Fund
Got a few hours to go yet, but Happy New Year to you!!! Jai Guru Dev! --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 no_reply@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@ wrote: Oh Dumbazgrey, why do you humiliate us and yourself with your minute man capabilities and minute man ejaculations? What kind of perverse, sadistic pleasures you derive from this minute filled orgies of yours? Hope 2012 multiplies your minutes !!! Much love, Ravi Very Funny !, the new year starts well ! :-) Happy New Year to everyone !
[FairfieldLife] Re: The MUM Annual Fund
It is impossible to overestimate your intelligence Enlightened Jim. We bow at its paucity. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, futur.musik futur.musik@... wrote: oops, azgrey farted again... --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, azgrey no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, futur.musik futur.musik@ wrote: Assume all of us to be intelligent thoughtful beings with much to contribute Simply reading one post by Sri Bubba Jim Flanigen refutes this assumption.
[FairfieldLife] Re: The MUM Annual Fund
Ha-Ha! That was good! ...at least it came out of your mouth this time... re: the Enlightened thing - ooga-booga!!! Are you another one of our Enlightenment SM freaks on here? You know, playing the push me, pull me with spirituality, tie me up, let me go? The way I look at it, a person is either dedicated to their freedom, or they aren't. It doesn't have to be called enlightenment or realization, and it doesn't matter how a person is being real. And you sit around on your lazy ass, casting aspersions at me because I am interested in my liberation, my enlightenment, because far from being some elitist about it, I believe it is a dynamic anyone can participate in for themselves. Does that freak you out? Do big special words like ENLIGHTENMENT and REALIZATION and BEING here now create such a rancor in you and others that any attempts to even bring up such topics always meet with your sloppy, lazy-assed derision? If so, WTF are you doing on here?? What do you have to contribute except a sour little message once in a while? also, Happy New Year!! --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, azgrey no_reply@... wrote: It is impossible to overestimate your intelligence Enlightened Jim. We bow at its paucity. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, futur.musik futur.musik@ wrote: oops, azgrey farted again... --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, azgrey no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, futur.musik futur.musik@ wrote: Assume all of us to be intelligent thoughtful beings with much to contribute Simply reading one post by Sri Bubba Jim Flanigen refutes this assumption.
[FairfieldLife] Re: The MUM Annual Fund
Your support allows MUM to nurture and develop the next generation of the world's enlightened leaders. Your generosity to the Annual Fund helps us to provide a world-class educational system for our future world leaders. Each tax-deductible donation fuels MUM's efforts to grow Consciousness-BasedSM education and develop an environment where students' inner development brings maximum outer success.
