Unofficial Fedora FAQ Updated for Fedora 10!
Hey there Fedora users! I've updated the Unofficial Fedora FAQ for Fedora 10: http://www.fedorafaq.org/ There are lots of new changes and additions! * With the combination of Fedora 10 and the new RPMFusion repository, there doesn't need to be a special fedorafaq.org yum configuration anymore! There are still instructions in the FAQ on how to configure yum to access rpmfusion, though. * The Java plugin included in Fedora 10 seems to work well enough that installing the Sun Java package isn't needed. * There's a networking (DNS) issue in Fedora 10 that some people are hitting, and I've added a FAQ question for that. And of course, all of the other questions have been updated for Fedora 10, too. If you see some other questions being frequently asked out there in the Fedora world, please let me know!! The contribution guidelines are here: http://www.fedorafaq.org/contribute/ And of course, one thing I'd really like to see is more translations of fedorafaq.org! If you'd like to be a translator, contact me directly and let me know! -Max -- http://www.everythingsolved.com/ Competent, Friendly Bugzilla and Perl Services. Everything Else, too. -- fedora-announce-list mailing list fedora-announce-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-announce-list
(no subject)
i wanted to join fedora art team.i have done work on gimp.and i am a beginner and i wanted to contribute in designing. ___ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
New designer
Hello! My name Alexander Smirnov. I am software engineer (graphics software) and graphics designer from Russia (St.-Petersburg). I am using Fedora and open source software Inkscape and GIMP. My example work from Artwork/DesignService (F10 release tshirt): Fedora 10 T-Shirt Light (raster)http://www.asmirnov.spb.ru/F10_TShirt_light.png Fedora 10 T-Shirt Light (vector)http://www.asmirnov.spb.ru/F10_TShirt_light.svg Fedora 10 T-Shirt Dark (raster)http://www.asmirnov.spb.ru/F10_TShirt_dark.png Fedora 10 T-Shirt Dark (vector)http://www.asmirnov.spb.ru/F10_TShirt_dark.svg Thanks! ___ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
Re: (no subject)
ayush goel wrote: i wanted to join fedora art team.i have done work on gimp.and i am a beginner and i wanted to contribute in designing. Watch the list and see what is going on, step up when you see something interesting. If you feel like it, pick a task from https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Artwork/DesignService PS: and try to put something in the subject line when writing an email -- nicu :: http://nicubunu.ro :: http://nicubunu.blogspot.com Cool Fedora wallpapers: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro/wallpapers/ Open Clip Art Library: http://www.openclipart.org my Fedora stuff: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro ___ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
Re: New designer
I am support and develop specific CAD software for for mining technologists. Thanks for Inkscape. 2008/12/10 Nicu Buculei [EMAIL PROTECTED] Alex Smirnov wrote: Hello! Hi, My name Alexander Smirnov. I am software engineer (graphics software) You develop graphic software? Like what? and graphics designer from Russia (St.-Petersburg). I am using Fedora and open source software Inkscape and GIMP. Cool, My example work from Artwork/DesignService (F10 release tshirt): I just sponsored you in the FAS based on that. -- nicu :: http://nicubunu.ro :: http://nicubunu.blogspot.com Cool Fedora wallpapers: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro/wallpapers/ Open Clip Art Library: http://www.openclipart.org my Fedora stuff: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro ___ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list ___ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
Fedora Design Creative Team (Art Team reorg?)
Hi folks, Just an idea: The Fedora Art Team's name and focus is more on artwork than UI design. Folks in Fedora who need help with UI design or potential contributors who want to help out with UI design might not necessarily link those kinds of tasks to an art team so they might be a bit lost. What if we renamed the art team to be the 'Fedora Design Creative Team,' and the art team as it is now would be a subgroup of this new design team? Under a 'design' banner, it might be easier for developers seeking out UI design advice to know where to go, and for community UI designers to find a home / a place to get involved. It would be a little strange I think to form a separate 'design' or 'UI design' team from the art team, because I think the two need to work close together to work well, and I don't think the usability SIG is really appropriate - usability is more the QA of UI design work, you know? Although maybe the usability SIG could be incorporated into a larger design team as well... In #fedora-art earlier today, we were thinking Design Creative would be good, because design represents the emphasis on following good design practices and ability to work on UI design work, while creative can encompass the typical branding and artwork tasks we take on as well as perhaps in the future expand to sound and video work. Maybe it could be 'Fedora Creative Design Team' to emphasize the nature of the design work we do (e.g. we're not designing software architecture or anything like that.) I was wondering what other art team members think of this idea and if they would be willing to support a renaming of the team and this explicit broadening of our scope? Thanks, ~m ___ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
Re: Fedora Design Creative Team (Art Team reorg?)
Máirín Duffy wrote: The Fedora Art Team's name and focus is more on artwork than UI design. Folks in Fedora who need help with UI design or potential contributors who want to help out with UI design might not necessarily link those kinds of tasks to an art team so they might be a bit lost. What if we renamed the art team to be the 'Fedora Design Creative Team,' and the art team as it is now would be a subgroup of this new design team? Under a 'design' banner, it might be easier for developers seeking out UI design advice to know where to go, and for community UI designers to find a home / a place to get involved. This looks like a sensible proposal and it gets a +1 from me. It would be a little strange I think to form a separate 'design' or 'UI design' team from the art team, because I think the two need to work close together to work well, We are a small team, it make sense to stay together then split in a two smaller teams and having a good parts of us in both teams. -- nicu :: http://nicubunu.ro :: http://nicubunu.blogspot.com Cool Fedora wallpapers: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro/wallpapers/ Open Clip Art Library: http://www.openclipart.org my Fedora stuff: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro ___ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
submissions to join mailing list
i wanted to join fedora art list and iwanted to contribute in art community as i am new beginner and i have done work on gimp. ___ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
(no subject)
can you please assign me a task . ___ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
Re: Fedora Design Creative Team (Art Team reorg?)
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 11:31:56AM -0500, Máirín Duffy wrote: Maybe it could be 'Fedora Creative Design Team' to emphasize the nature of the design work we do (e.g. we're not designing software architecture or anything like that.) I'm good with this one. Only thing I'm worried about is renaming all the references to the Art team that we control, but, eh, whatever. -- Ian Weller [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://ianweller.org GnuPG fingerprint: E51E 0517 7A92 70A2 4226 B050 87ED 7C97 EFA8 4A36 Technology is a word that describes something that doesn't work yet. ~ Douglas Adams pgpzbO3z01W7W.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
Re: Fedora Design Creative Team (Art Team reorg?)
Ian Weller wrote: Only thing I'm worried about is renaming all the references to the Art team that we control, but, eh, whatever. Are we going to rename the resources (the mailing list, the FAS group, etc.)? For the wiki pages I understand we will keep the Artwork/ infrastructure for what's related to graphics. -- nicu :: http://nicubunu.ro :: http://nicubunu.blogspot.com Cool Fedora wallpapers: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro/wallpapers/ Open Clip Art Library: http://www.openclipart.org my Fedora stuff: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro ___ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
Re: (no subject)
ayush goel wrote: can you please assign me a task . We don't work that way, from top to bottom, but in a more free way, from bottom to top: we don't assign tasks, we are not your boss. Take yourself something you are comfortable with. PS: and even if we would like to act bossy and give you tasks, as we are not yet familiar with your work and don't know your skills (do you have any work published online?), we have no way to know your area of expertise. -- nicu :: http://nicubunu.ro :: http://nicubunu.blogspot.com Cool Fedora wallpapers: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro/wallpapers/ Open Clip Art Library: http://www.openclipart.org my Fedora stuff: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro ___ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
[Bug 475743] New: Many chinese glyphs on Japanese environment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Many chinese glyphs on Japanese environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 Summary: Many chinese glyphs on Japanese environment Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: VLGothic-fonts AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Classification: Fedora Description of problem: Since VLGothic-fonts is upgraded to 20081203, I see many chinese glyphs on Japanese environment. Downloading to 20081029 works good. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): VLGothic-fonts-20081203-2.fc11 (perhaps?) cjkunifonts-ukai-0.2.20080216.1-10.fc11.noarch.rpm cjkunifonts-uming-0.2.20080216.1-10.fc11.noarch.rpm How reproducible: 100% Steps to Reproduce: 1. For example, the following URL: http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/policycoreutils/po/ja.po?root=elvisr1=1.24r2=1.25 Actual results: See attached -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 475743] Many chinese glyphs on Japanese environment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 03:36:20 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=326463) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=326463) screenshot with VLGothic 20081203 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 475743] Many chinese glyphs on Japanese environment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 03:37:06 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=326465) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=326465) screenshot with VLGothic 20081029 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 18928] RFE: add a gfx preview to font packages
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18928 --- Comment #6 from Richard Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 01:49:44 PST --- Can we dump the file in /usr/share/fonts/preview/? I would prefer a svg from a programming point of view. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 475743] Many chinese glyphs on Japanese environment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 Akira TAGOH [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo? --- Comment #4 from Akira TAGOH [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 05:59:25 EDT --- my rawhide box is broken now so I can't do any testing... so just guessing, is this issue gone if you do remove /etc/fonts/conf.d/64-ttf-arphic-uming.conf or add testing for Chinese like: match test name=lang compare=contains stringzh/string /test test name=family stringsans-serif/string /test edit name=family mode=prepend binding=same stringAR PL UMing HK/string stringAR PL UMing CN/string /edit /match instead of preference alias? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 473836] Fonts in firefox look blurry
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473836 Ben Laenen [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #21 from Ben Laenen [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 07:10:38 EDT --- Maybe you should get a copy of freetype that has the bytecode interpreter enabled so you don't have to use the freetype autohinter anymore. Using the truetype hinting instructions from the font itself will make it much more crisp. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 473836] Fonts in firefox look blurry
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473836 --- Comment #22 from Nicolas Mailhot [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 07:25:42 EDT --- The reporter writes that the same fonts work fine in the rest of the desktop gui, that also uses the system freetype with autohinting. Thus clearly the problem is not the system freetype or cairo libs, the problem lies in the way firefox uses them. Investigation will probably show that: 1. firefox fails to pass a crucial rendering parameter to one of the system libs, or 2. that since firefox insists on duplicating a private font configuration system in prefs.js (instead of using the desktop settings broadcasted via XSettings), it's missing one parameter which had been set desktop-side and not duplicated by the user manually in prefs.js. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 475743] Many chinese glyphs on Japanese environment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo? | --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 06:37:34 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) is this issue gone if you do remove /etc/fonts/conf.d/64-ttf-arphic-uming.conf It seems this works or add testing for Chinese like: snip instead of preference alias? Would you tell me to what file? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 473836] Fonts in GNOME look blurry (was: in Firefox)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473836 Nicolas Mailhot [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #24 from Nicolas Mailhot [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 09:09:48 EDT --- That's something else entirely, if the whole system behaves the same way, everything is probably working fine. Font settings are highly subjective, their effects depend on the hardware you have, and what's best for one font won't necessarily be best for another, so two different systems, with different hardware, and defaults from different years, behaving differently, is most definitely NOTABUG. If you prefer the old defaults you just have to copy them from the old system to the new one. Note however that unless the hardware is identical there is no warranty you'll find them as satisfying on one system compared to the other. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 473836] Fonts in GNOME look blurry (was: in Firefox)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473836 --- Comment #25 from Andrzej Nowak [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 10:10:41 EDT --- I see your point, however it most likely is not my case that you are writing about. With all due respect, ever since I have filed this bug I have been treated like a novice. Please look again at the screenshots I've attached. The hardware correctly displays incorrect rendering, the hard evidence is on the images, which are screenshots, not photographs of my screen, so they look the same on any reasonable screen or graphics card. I highly doubt that the rendering visible on my screenshots is intentional to make up for hardware deficiencies, and if it is, the software incorrectly recognizes the hardware as deficient. Changing any setting - be it DPI, antialiasing, pixel order, font smoothing - yields worse results. Trust me, I've experimented with that a lot before deciding to bother people here at bugzilla, who already have a lot of other stuff to worry about. Both systems I own have exactly the same font settings, although the hardware configurations are different, and that's because they give the best results. On both systems fonts look perfectly fine in MS Windows and Fedora 6 and Fedora 7, however on one of them Fedora 10 displays crap. Therefore, although I am aware that this might not be the case, I trust that there is no problem with my hardware (which is, on a side note, definitely not low end). In essence, a fresh install of Fedora is nearly unusable for me because of this issue and I am willing to help you make it better, so that less people experience the problem. But I need assistance with that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 473836] Fonts in GNOME look blurry (was: in Firefox)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473836 Nicolas Mailhot [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC|[EMAIL PROTECTED] | --- Comment #26 from Nicolas Mailhot [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 10:28:20 EDT --- I've seen the screenshots. They don't correspond to my own preferences as displayed on my hardware (the rendering on another screen may be different depending on pixel density, RVB repartition, gamma settings, etc). However as I wrote before those preferences are subjective and if there is one thing I've learnt since working on fonts is that if you show 3 different screenshots to three different people they'll all choose a different one as the crapiest and will be convinced the two others share their POW. So that's not conclusive. Post a screenshot of what you consider good and people like Behdad may tell you how to achieve this kind of rendering. I've stopped playing this game long ago. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 473836] Fonts in GNOME look blurry (was: in Firefox)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473836 Orion Poplawski [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC|[EMAIL PROTECTED] | --- Comment #27 from Orion Poplawski [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 10:37:11 EDT --- Can we please get this assigned to the proper component (and get me out of the loop)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 475593] Review Request: fontpackages - Common directory and macro definitions used by font packages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475593 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 11:36:48 EDT --- No need to wait more. I got confirmation from an FPC member. --- This package (fontpackages) is approved by oget --- Other than this, is there any draft yet for the new guidelines? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 472418] Review Request: xmbdfed - Bitmap Font Editor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472418 Lucian Langa [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 467982] anaconda doesn't render glyphs with the proper font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467982 Andy Lindeberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 472418] Review Request: xmbdfed - Bitmap Font Editor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472418 --- Comment #5 from Tom spot Callaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 16:19:08 EDT --- - Please also keep the classical order of files for fedora spec files What do you mean by that? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 472418] Review Request: xmbdfed - Bitmap Font Editor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472418 Tom spot Callaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Tom spot Callaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 16:32:11 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: xmbdfed Short Description: Bitmap Font Editor Owners: spot Branches: EL-5 F-9 F-10 devel InitialCC: ... and it's done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 456527] Review Request: gentium-basic-fonts - Gentium Basic Font Family
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456527 Nicolas Mailhot [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED] ||om) --- Comment #11 from Nicolas Mailhot [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 16:32:53 EDT --- Hi Rahul, At this point, since FPC approved the new packaging templates yesterday, and FESCO will review them next week, it's probably more productive if you target the new templates directly (that will probably also make my next request easier). Otherwise you'll just spend time on the old template and I'll ask you to change it all next week. So just install the fontpackages* rpm from http://nim.fedorapeople.org/fontpackages/ check /etc/rpmdevtools/spectemplate-fonts-multi.spec and use it as a template to make an rpm with two subpackages (one for gentium basic and one for gentium book basic) Then you can look at /usr/share/doc/fontpackages-devel-1.11/fontconfig-templates/substitution-font-template.conf for the substitution rules (but your current rules do not seem too bad) However, your xml is broken. Please always check your xml files with xmllint --format before submission. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 473836] Fonts in GNOME look blurry (was: in Firefox)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473836 --- Comment #28 from Andrzej Nowak [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 17:04:28 EDT --- Ben: Many thanks for your advice. I recompiled freetype and I've included the bytecode interpreter. While not perfect, the fonts look MUCH better. My original question, as to why they were ugly from the beginning (I guess many people would agree that what is on the screenshots is not very readable), remains unanswered. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 472418] Review Request: xmbdfed - Bitmap Font Editor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472418 --- Comment #7 from Tom spot Callaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 17:02:57 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) BTW this one may be a better option for packaging (didn't actually try any of them) http://www.math.nmsu.edu/~mleisher/Software/gbdfed/ Looks like the GTK version of this package. I'm willing to maintain them both: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475884 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 455647] [Indic] Firefox displays garbage Indic characters on parts of some English webpages
Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=455647 Mike Beltzner [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||fixed1.9.1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 467982] anaconda doesn't render glyphs with the proper font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467982 --- Comment #13 from MATSUURA Takanori [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 20:08:06 EDT --- Sometimes, font switching in pango is irresponsible、especially in alias fonts (serif, sans-serif, monospace). Firefox used to have the similar problem and has been fixed. http://bugzilla.mozilla.gr.jp/show_bug.cgi?id=5180 (Mozilla-gumi bugzilla; in Japanese) https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=339513 (bmo) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 475743] Many chinese glyphs on Japanese environment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 --- Comment #7 from Akira TAGOH [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 20:13:50 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) Would you tell me to what file? Try to replace: alias familysans-serif/family prefer familyAR PL UMing HK/family familyAR PL UMing CN/family /prefer /alias in 64-ttf-arphic-uming.conf with the above for sans-serif. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 475743] Many chinese glyphs on Japanese environment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 Akira TAGOH [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag||needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED] ||om) --- Comment #8 from Akira TAGOH [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 20:19:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) Behdad recently wanted to experiment with new syntax to deal with fonts that need locale-specific ordering. You should try to ping him to check if he hasn't a better fontconfig recipe. Aha. Cc'ing him. Behdad, do you have any idea to resolve a kind of locale-specific ordering issue in fontconfig? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 472418] Review Request: xmbdfed - Bitmap Font Editor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472418 --- Comment #10 from Lucian Langa [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-11 00:38:56 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) - Please also keep the classical order of files for fedora spec files What do you mean by that? what i meant was the usual order of fields in spec file e.g. Name: Version: Release: Summary: Group: License: URL: Source0: BuildRoot: BuildRequires: Requires: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 458169] [...@font-face] implement downloadable font support on Linux
Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=458169 Karl Tomlinson (:karlt) [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||fixed1.9.1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 455647] [Indic] Firefox displays garbage Indic characters on parts of some English webpages
Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=455647 Karl Tomlinson (:karlt) [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||fixed1.9.0.6 --- Comment #31 from Karl Tomlinson (:karlt) [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 22:11:42 PST --- http://bonsai.mozilla.org/cvsquery.cgi?module=PhoenixTinderboxbranch=HEADcvsroot=%2Fcvsrootdate=explicitmindate=1228973642maxdate=1228973890who=karlt%2B%25karlt.net -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 347237] Making Pango use a given cairo_font_face_t
If you have any questions why you received this email, please see the text at the end of this email. Replies to this email are NOT read, please see the text at the end of this email. You can add comments to this bug at: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=347237 pango | general | Ver: unspecified Nicolas Mailhot changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fedora-fonts-bugs- ||[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- See http://bugzilla.gnome.org/page.cgi?id=email.html for more info about why you received this email, why you can't respond via email, how to stop receiving emails (or reduce the number you receive), and how to contact someone if you are having problems with the system. You can add comments to this bug at http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=347237. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 423191] [ml_IN] combination is INCorrect with 0d30 [consonant+0d4d+0d30]
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=423191 A S Alam [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |VERIFIED --- Comment #5 from A S Alam [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-11 01:50:47 EDT --- it is fixed and working fine with following package: pango-1.20.4-1.fc9 lohit-fonts-malayalam-2.2.1-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
Re: arial narrow is broken since Fedora 8
Le Mer 10 décembre 2008 01:54, Kevin Kofler a écrit : Please do not ignore real-world usability in your quest for perfection. This is not a quest of perfection this is getting font and text bugs fixed. The freetype autohinter has progressed because we've enabled it in Fedora despite its problems and told people to report bugs upstream instead of helping them enable the bytecode interpreter and ignore the problem. OO.o has started working on OpenType CFF support because we told them plainly we would not stop merging fonts in this format or prioritize OpenType TTF just so people didn't notice that unlike other apps, OO.o didn't work. Ligature support was fixed in Firefox because we didn't try to hide them and so people complained upstream of upstream bugs. Likewise ligature support was lately fixed in freetype, again because we didn't hide the problem and people complained in the right place (upstream issue trackers, not general-purpose downstream lists). When we tried to hide a problem by removing triggering glyphs font-side there was 0% progress on fixing application-side and some upstreams still argue we should restore the hiding so they don't have to bother. Red Hat tried to avoid font problems by not merging anything that looked like it would trigger application bugs, and had to shell some millions later for Liberation; complaining at the same time the FLOSS font scene really was not active enough for them to rely on it. Well, if you want activity you have to support this activity not ignore it and hope things will magically perfect themselves without distro-side exposition. Your proposition is made of 100% pure un-adultered FAIL. And facts back me up on this. You'll find scores of people to rewrite spontaneously media players, MUAs, or the distro boot chrome, but people won't work on font problems unless users complain to them, and users won't complain if you hide or diffuse the problems. They'll just note Fedora font support is crap, without pointing to any specific fact. Just Google for 'linux fonts', and you'll find many such reports, culminating around 2006, which incidently is when Fedora decided to get its feet wet, and released Fedora 6 with DejaVu LGC as default, breaking the status quo and starting the virtuous circle of upstream fixes. True, even with users complaining, some bugs take ages to get fixed, but the way to accelerate this is to get more users to complain, not remove the complains. If some of your favorite DEs or apps are not fixed yet organise fellow users and put some pression upstream (or, better, find someone to submit upstream a patch). I personally think our current course is the best to « [lead] the advancement of free, open software and content. » Anyway, I'm sick of repeating the same arguments in different forums. Here's the deal: you disagree with our current font strategy, so go convince FESCO. If FESCO agrees with you, I'll happily give you the Fonts SIG keys, and let you manage as you wish from now on. I personnaly do not intend to waste my personal time trying to improve the Fedora font situation if one of the precious few levers I have at my disposition, users complaining upstream of problems, is removed. And that's the last thing I'll write on the subject. -- Nicolas Mailhot ___ Fedora-fonts-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-list
Re: arial narrow is broken since Fedora 8
On Wednesday 10 December 2008, Behdad Esfahbod wrote: That has nothing to do with why the bug is there. The bug is there because no one every got to fix it. Part of the problem has been that I have no Free fonts installed that show that behavior. When it comes to font styles, this should give you a test case: http://home.sus.mcgill.ca/~moyogo/fonts/test/Jaja-All-OTF.zip (more at http://home.sus.mcgill.ca/~moyogo/fonts/test/ ) I'd like to see a KDE or Gnome dialog capable of showing all 62 (including outlines) :-) Ben ___ Fedora-fonts-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-list
Re: ssh_host_keys
On Wed December 10 2008, Mike McGrath wrote: On Wed, 10 Dec 2008, Mike McGrath wrote: I've not actually used global ssh_known_hosts before, I wouldn't be surprised if it causes issues in some of our scripts that might have a conflicting ~/.ssh/known_hosts. Lets keep our eyes open. If there is a conflict, then the public key of the host the script connects to will probably not match. Therefore there is a problem anyways. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/SOP/ssh_known_hosts I suggest to use echo app1,10.8.34.59 $(cat /etc/ssh/ssh_host_rsa_key.pub) on the regarding machine instead of ssh-keyscan -t rsa app1,10.8.34.59 on a remote machine. Otherwise there may be still a small window of opportunity for a mitm attack. Regards, Till signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
OpenVPN
Hello all. I had introduced myself a few weeks ago and mentioned that I have some OpenVPN experience. Today I was reading over some of the SOPs and noticed this TODO on the OpenVPN SOP: Deploy an additional VPN server outside of PHX. OpenVPN does support failover automatically so if configured properly, when the primary VPN server goes down all hosts should connect to the next host in the list I would like to offer to work on this. I would need a mentor to help me get acclimated to the environment but I am confident that I could get it up and running effectively and I have some spare time that I would love to put towards this. Regards. -- TJ Davis The sun can still shine behind a closed mind. -All Together Separate ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: ssh_host_keys
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 11:04:25PM +0100, Till Maas wrote: On Wed December 10 2008, Mike McGrath wrote: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/SOP/ssh_known_hosts I suggest to use echo app1,10.8.34.59 $(cat /etc/ssh/ssh_host_rsa_key.pub) You may also want to include the FQDN and any other aliases for each machine. Otherwise if you try to ssh to a host using an FQDN or alias/CNAME, ssh will add a new entry to ~/.ssh/known_hosts with the new name, even if an entry for that IP address already exists in the global /etc/ssh/ssh_known_hosts. ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: OpenVPN
On Wed, 10 Dec 2008, TJ Davis wrote: Hello all. I had introduced myself a few weeks ago and mentioned that I have some OpenVPN experience. Today I was reading over some of the SOPs and noticed this TODO on the OpenVPN SOP: Deploy an additional VPN server outside of PHX. OpenVPN does support failover automatically so if configured properly, when the primary VPN server goes down all hosts should connect to the next host in the list I would like to offer to work on this. I would need a mentor to help me get acclimated to the environment but I am confident that I could get it up and running effectively and I have some spare time that I would love to put towards this. Regards. -- TJ Davis Sounds good TJ, Ricky was working on this a bit but he's also pretty busy. Stop by #fedora-admin sometime tomorrow and ping me, we'll put a plan together. -Mike___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
fedorahosted mtn
elfutils is switching to git, and AFAIK no other fedorahosted projects use mtn. I don't intend to work on the hosting support for mtn any more. (I've stopped maintaining any mtn-related Fedora/EPEL packages too.) Thomas Moschny maintains the mtn-related Fedora packages. He's also the author of the trac plugin. Thomas is the only person I can think of who might be interested in maintaining mtn hosting support for fedorahosted. Unless Thomas wants to take it over, I suggest we drop the mtn support (such as it is). Please note that I would like the existing mtn.fedorahosted.org alias and the run-mtn ssh support to stay around for a while, until all the elfutils developers have finalized the migration. So don't hurry to chop it all off. Thanks, Roland ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
مــــــــوقــــــــع الــــتـــــــو بــــــــة للبيع
موقع التـــوبة للبيعhttp://www.ksa001.com/vbيزدادنا شرف قدومك لنا _ Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE! http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
changed owner of git repos
Just FYI, I changed the owners of the git repos on hosted1 to be the first administrator found in their FAS group, since there was a ticket complaining that everything was owned by 'root'. Now you can see real owners at http://git.fedorahosted.org for the most part. If you disagree with the assignment of who the owner is, please either change the directory owner directly on hosted1 if you have access, or let me or someone else in sysadmin-hosted know and we'll take care of it. Thanks! -Jon ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: yum does not recognize correct Fedora version
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 10:25 PM, David Scriven [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2 Downloaded fedora-release-9-5.transition.noarch.rpm and installed it
check to make sure the yum.conf you have does not have the
distroverpkg package defined overriding the default.
By default yum sets distroverpkg at what provides the redhat-release
you can check that on your system with this
rpm -q --whatprovides redhat-release --qf %{NAME}-%{VERSION}-%{RELEASE}\n
all you should see listed is fedora-release-9-5.transition
-jef
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Firefox3 silently fails to save file (Fedora 8)
Hello all, I noticed that with Firefox 3 (3.0 as well as 3.0.4 from remi's repos) in my Fedora 8 sometimes silently fails to save a file (downloaded). This happens when I attempt to save the download to a directory where I don't have write access.. easy to fix (PEBCAK), but IMO *silently* failing is a bug from Firefox 3. Did anyone notice that behaviour? Regards, -- wwp signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: only logout available after last update
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 3:28 AM, Kevin Kofler [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: Kevin Kempter wrote: Since the last update if I choose logout, shutdown, restart, etc from the K menu the screen goes black and white and the subsequent dialog has ONLY logout available Is this intentional ? Of course not. ;-) This is: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475444 I saw this before. The last kde update before FC6 went EOL caused the same problem. Those who still have an FC6 around can check that (kde version 3.5.8-1). It was fixed in the next release for F7 and F8, but FC6 missed it. -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Firefox3 silently fails to save file (Fedora 8)
wwp wrote: Hello all, I noticed that with Firefox 3 (3.0 as well as 3.0.4 from remi's repos) in my Fedora 8 sometimes silently fails to save a file (downloaded). This happens when I attempt to save the download to a directory where I don't have write access.. easy to fix (PEBCAK), but IMO *silently* failing is a bug from Firefox 3. Did anyone notice that behaviour? No, I don't see that behavior. Can't say I normally try saving to a directory I don't own...but when I just tried it did say it could be complete the operation. -- Why my thoughts are my own, when they are in, but when they are out they are another's. -- Susanna Martin, executed for witchcraft, 1681 [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Gnome and kde terminals in F10
Hi, in gnome, all the open gnome-terminal are not saved when logging out, and are lost when returning to a new section. (yes, I have the Automatic remember running applications when logging out checked). In kde I, cannot use konsole transparency anymore. I tried konsole --force-transparency, but no difference (in gnome I have transparency). This is an Intel onboard video. Any workaround? -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: only logout available after last update
Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: I saw this before. No you didn't. The last kde update before FC6 went EOL caused the same problem. That was a completely different problem from the one we have now, even if the effects are the same. Kevin Kofler -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Experience with x86_64-only (no i386) in F10?
2008/12/9 Patrick O'Callaghan [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 10:54 AM, Niels Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2008/12/9 Patrick O'Callaghan [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 4:52 AM, Niels Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: All 32bit binary programs you want to run will not work. I think you mean not all 32-bit programs you want to run will work. All dynamically linked 32bit programs will not work. Is that better? That depends on what you mean. You're saying that no dynamically-linked 32-bit program will work. If you mean that some will and some won't, then that's not what you're saying. I'm talking of those you don't get the source for obviously. If I'm wrong in that, please explain how such a program would work. Niels -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: phone device connection
I want to access the files in the phone. Could you please mention how to? Thanks in advance. Regds, Sandesh Karanth On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 11:26 PM, Sandesh Karanth [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: Hi There, I'm using Fedora 10 and am not able to access my phone Nokia 5610 through it. Once I connect my phone to usb, the messages I get in dmesg is usb 4-1: USB disconnect, address 2 usb 4-1: new full speed USB device using uhci_hcd and address 3 usb 4-1: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice cdc_acm 4-1:1.1: ttyACM0: USB ACM device usb 4-1: bad CDC descriptors usb 4-1: bad CDC descriptors usb 4-1: New USB device found, idVendor=0421, idProduct=0025 usb 4-1: New USB device strings: Mfr=1, Product=2, SerialNumber=0 usb 4-1: Product: Nokia 5610d-1 usb 4-1: Manufacturer: Nokia But I am not getting any icon or a taskbar entity though which I can access my phone. Kindly let me know what can be done. You can find the complete dmesg file in the attachment. -- Kind Regards, Sandesh Karanth -- I Hate to Love! I Love to Hate!! Sandesh Karanth -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: PackageKit-0.3.12-1.fc10 and gnome-packagekit-0.3.12-1.fc10 updates
On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 22:41 -0600, Frank Cox wrote: Should we update to them using yum update? Or is there some other way that this issue needs to be approached? yum update should work. Richard. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Plymouth + intelfb (i965) ?
Caitlyn O'Hanna wrote: On Fri, 2008-12-05 at 12:52 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: Does vga=0x318 work? Yes it does, I've also found that using vga=0x361 works as well and uses the proper resolution (1280x800). However, I was under the impression that using the vesa hack to get around KMS made the transition from Plymouth to GDM and perhaps logging in problematic. So far this has not been the case, but I have noticed the mode transitions between Plymouth and GDM (the 'flicker'). Correct. If you fall back to using framebuffer mode, then you will still see flicker. Only when using KMS, will you not see that. That will come in a future update for more chipsets. Rahul -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Plymouth + intelfb (i965) ?
Marcelo Magno T. Sales wrote: Em Ter 09 Dez 2008, Caitlyn O'Hanna escreveu: On Fri, 2008-12-05 at 12:52 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: Does vga=0x318 work? Yes it does, I've also found that using vga=0x361 works as well and uses the proper resolution (1280x800). Good to know. This resolution has the same aspect ratio that I use here, though with a different resolution. Where did you get this information? Were there other values/resolutions for Intel chipsets? vga=ask will tell you. There is in kernel documentation for more details as well. Rahul -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: sata_nv OK in f10?
On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 19:35 -0500, Kevin J. Cummings wrote: I don't know if its the disk, the system's power supply, or the chipset. But I *have* lost 2 other HDs in the same machine (120GB and 40GB) Or crap disc drives? I won't touch western digital drives, any more. I've had several of them die with a very short life span, in several different computers. Overheating is also a problem, some of them get damn hot, and start behaving badly. Putting a fan in front of the drives in one of my systems solved random computer stuff-ups. But if you have a drive killing system, I'd try and find the cause, rather than just put up with it. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ uname -r 2.6.27.5-41.fc9.i686 Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I read messages from the public lists. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: I need to see open connections this moment - With Iptables i can only see logs
Maybe this helps... as root type : ss man ss On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 10:21 PM, Carlos Carrero Gutierrez [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: Hi, i use Iptables and i would like to find a tool or software in order to see my open connections. In doesn't care if it's a gui or not, and it can be not interactive (of course). Wireshark capture paquets but i can't be constantly searching if a paquet is correct or not. Somebody could help me? Thank you very much, and sorry (i am doing crossposting). -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: How to get rid of nautilus (try deux)
Hi Geoffrey, On Wed 10/12/08 6:19 AM , Geoffrey Leach [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent: I'd like to not run nautilus on the desktop in Fedora 10. In Fedora 9, removing it from .gnome2/session worked, but now it is no longer mentioned there. Any suggestions? Now i am not sure about this (since I don't use gnome[1]), but since this was 'try deux', I'll venture a possible guess. It may/may not work a. make sure you have gconf-editor installed b. fire up gconf-editor c. go to Edit-Find, type in nautils, select 'search also in key values' d. look for the most likely place where nautilus can be disabled and change accordingly. AFAICT, it would make sense to remove it from /desktop/gnome/session/required_components_list but I could be wrong. e. report back if this does it for you. HTH cheers, - steve [1] Complicated desktops never really fit my head. -- Linux Centric Marketplace: http://www.tuxcompatible.com -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: How to get rid of nautilus (try deux)
On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 16:49 -0800, Geoffrey Leach wrote: I'd like to not run nautilus on the desktop in Fedora 10. In Fedora 9, removing it from .gnome2/session worked, but now it is no longer mentioned there. Any suggestions? Do you just mean stopping Nautilus from drawing the desktop display? Or just stop it drawing some things onto the desktop. You can run gconf-editor Navigate into its /apps/nautilus/desktop Turn off some visible options. Navigate into its /apps/nautilus/desktop Turn off a show desktop option (for a more extreme option). That'll give you a blank desktop, though Nautilus is still available as a file browser application. If you mean changing window managers, that's another thing. Someone else might be able to advise on that. If you still want to run Gnome, but differently. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ uname -r 2.6.27.5-41.fc9.i686 Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I read messages from the public lists. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: I need Miredo for F10
Todd Denniston wrote: Kevin J. Cummings wrote, On 12/09/2008 05:55 PM: Robert Moskowitz wrote: And http://rpmfind.net/linux/rpm2html/search.php?query=miredosubmit=Search+...system=arch= only finds it for F9. So I download that anyway and try to do a yum localinstall and it needs: libcap.so.1 And libcap.so.2 is installed, what to do? Well, one of number of things things: 1) If the API for libcap.so.2 is backward compatible enough for what you need it for, just put a in symlink linking libcap.so.1 - libcap.so.2. 2) If the API for libcap.so.2 is incompatible with what your application needs, then you will need to find a .src.rpm for building libpcap.so.1, build it yourself, and install it locally. 3) Find an old RPM and install it and hope that it works. Sometimes there are compatibility versions of libraries available in one or more of the repos, but a yum search libcap.so.1 for me doesn't find anything. A further option considering Miredo is an open-source Teredo IPv6 tunneling software for...[1], would be to snag a copy of the source to Miredo[2] and build it on F10... of course that assumes that the software has something sort of nice like a configure script to let the OP know that they need more 'devel' packages and that the OP understands what the configure script is asking for. And there is the crux of the problem. If it is not a plug-n-pay build, it will take me a day to pull off, and I have other fish to fry on this project right now. I will try and reach the builder and get them to look into this. [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miredo [2] http://www.remlab.net/files/miredo/?C=N;O=D -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
How to determine cause of computer freezing.
Dear fellow fedora users, I thought I had found a solution to a computer Asus Motherboard, 1.25/1.5 GB RAM, AMD 64 Dual core processor, freezing with kernel 2.6.27.5-117.fc10.x86_64. I boot it with acpi=off parameter and it works mostly. Yesterday, I connected an external usb modem to connect to the internet. For about a minute or two the machine continued to work, but then it froze. I booted two more times only to find out the machine froze again :( when I ran dmesg, I saw the errors that are believed to be Xorg's fault: pci :01:05.0: HDMI Type A-1: EDID invalid. [drm:edid_is_valid] *ERROR* Raw EDID: 3a0 00 a0 00 ff ff ff 00 5a 63 05 f5 01 01 01 01 Zc.. 307 0c 01 03 1d 20 18 be 2b 2e 12 a5 51 46 98 25 . ..+...QF.% 30f 48 4f ff ff 80 61 4f 31 59 45 59 61 59 71 4f .HO...aO1YEYaYqO 381 40 81 80 81 8f c3 1e 00 20 41 00 20 30 10 60 [EMAIL PROTECTED] A. 0.` 313 00 36 e6 10 00 00 1e 00 00 00 ff 00 32 33 4b ..6..23K 330 32 30 37 30 30 32 39 38 0a 00 00 00 fd 00 32 020700298..2 3b4 1e 56 0f 00 0a 20 20 20 20 20 20 00 00 00 fc ..V... 300 47 37 35 66 2d 32 0a 20 20 20 20 20 20 00 23 .G75f-2. .# pci :01:05.0: VGA-1: EDID invalid. [drm:edid_is_valid] *ERROR* Raw EDID: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 300 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 300 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 300 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 300 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 300 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 300 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 300 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 Is there a way of booting like in debug mode, to see what causes all these problems. I boot slax linux live cd, and I can surf the net, I can do all the things that I can't with Fedora without any problems not even the Xorg errors. Advice/Suggestions/Comments are very much appreciated and welcomed. Regards, Antonio -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: I need Miredo for F10
Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wrote: A further option considering Miredo is an open-source Teredo IPv6 tunneling software for...[1], would be to snag a copy of the source to Miredo[2] and build it on F10... of course that assumes that the software has something sort of nice like a configure script to let the OP know that they need more 'devel' packages and that the OP understands what the configure script is asking for. But the more top-level question is WHY Isn't the Fedora built-in IPv6 networking up to the task? And if you are on a v4 network and need v6 connectivity? That is Miredo's roll. It is a transition mechinism. Lots of discussions about it at the IETF meeting last month in the IPv6OPS workgroup. Actually, I am working on a project that is using HIP (infrahip.hiit.fi) over IPv6 (with Miredo where needed), doing secure mobility and NAT traversal (Miredo over ICE). SIP and P2PSIP are my apps for this. What has driven me to even spend time with F10 is two-fold: The 2.6.27 kernel has the IPsec ESP BEET mode patch, I no longer have to work on patching the kernel or running HIP in userspace. Hopefully some of the problems I have had with my OQOs (www.oqo.com) will just work with F10 (I almost have suspend/resume working). Otherwise, I would just be using Centos, as part of my 'model' is to be production for this. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: I need Miredo for F10
Rick Stevens wrote: Robert Moskowitz wrote: And http://rpmfind.net/linux/rpm2html/search.php?query=miredosubmit=Search+...system=arch= only finds it for F9. So I download that anyway and try to do a yum localinstall and it needs: libcap.so.1 And libcap.so.2 is installed, what to do? You can try to set up a symlink: ln -s /lib/libcap.so.2 /lib/libcap.so.1 Usually newer versions of libraries are backwards compatible with older ones. If it works, great. Did not work. Thanks for the idea. If not: rm -f /lib/libcap.so.1 to put things back they way they were. REF: F9:/lib/libcap.so.1 -- /lib/libcap.so.1.10 /lib/libcap.so.2 -- /lib/libcap.so.2.06 F10: /lib/libcap.so.2 -- /lib/libcap.so.2.10 -- - Rick Stevens, Systems Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] - - AIM/Skype: therps2 ICQ: 22643734 Yahoo: origrps2 - - - - UNIX is actually quite user friendly. The problem is that it's - - just very picky of who its friends are! - -- -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
cups failed last week, now amanda
And the cups update to fix a denial of service that yumex did last night, now is a denial of service, my logs are drowning in: = Dec 10 08:30:19 coyote xinetd[4657]: START: amanda pid=17625 from=:::192.168.71.3 Dec 10 08:30:19 coyote xinetd[17625]: FAIL: amanda address from=:::192.168.71.3 Dec 10 08:30:19 coyote xinetd[4657]: EXIT: amanda status=0 pid=17625 duration=0(sec) Dec 10 08:30:29 coyote xinetd[4657]: START: amanda pid=17660 from=:::192.168.71.3 Dec 10 08:30:29 coyote xinetd[17660]: FAIL: amanda address from=:::192.168.71.3 Dec 10 08:30:29 coyote xinetd[4657]: EXIT: amanda status=0 pid=17660 duration=0(sec) Dec 10 08:30:39 coyote xinetd[4657]: START: amanda pid=17664 from=:::192.168.71.3 Dec 10 08:30:39 coyote xinetd[17664]: FAIL: amanda address from=:::192.168.71.3 Dec 10 08:30:39 coyote xinetd[4657]: EXIT: amanda status=0 pid=17664 duration=0(sec) Dec 10 08:31:09 coyote ntpd[2224]: synchronized to 64.247.17.250, stratum 2 Dec 10 08:40:32 coyote smbd[17980]: [2008/12/10 08:40:32, 0] printing/print_cups.c:cups_connect(69) Dec 10 08:40:32 coyote smbd[17980]: Unable to connect to CUPS server coyote.coyote.den:631 - Success Dec 10 08:40:32 coyote smbd[22954]: [2008/12/10 08:40:32, 0] printing/print_cups.c:cups_connect(69) Dec 10 08:40:32 coyote smbd[22954]: Unable to connect to CUPS server coyote.coyote.den:631 - Success Dec 10 08:45:40 coyote ntpd[2224]: synchronized to 128.113.3.34, stratum 2 I am behind a firewall here, and no reason to setup any ipv6 stuffs yet, but something has enabled it, now apparently causing amanda to fail also. What the heck? More and more, fedora is turning into one grand denial of service. Its getting old, fast! Thanks for any hints to fix this, it is probably one common cause. ipv6 where it isn't wanted. -- Cheers, Gene There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order. -Ed Howdershelt (Author) Neurotics build castles in the sky, Psychotics live in them, And psychiatrists collect the rent. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: phone device connection
On Wednesday 10 December 2008 04:31:35 Sandesh Karanth wrote: I want to access the files in the phone. Could you please mention how to? Try using bitpim. sudo yum install bitpim -- Garry T. Williams --- +1 678 656-4579 -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: How to determine cause of computer freezing.
On Wed, 10 Dec 2008 05:12:17 -0800 (PST) Antonio Olivares wrote: Suggestions/Comments are very much appreciated and welcomed. I can only guess here, but something like EDID info going funny might be the video card (or video chip if it is onboard video) overheating. You could try opening the case and pointing a fan at it to see if the problem disappears. You might also want to download memtest86+ from http://www.memtest.org/ and run it for an hour or two just to make sure your memory is OK. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: asus w5f Intel sound on Fedora 10
sfilippo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I cannot get the sound subsystem to work. ... 00:1b.0 Audio device: Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) High Definition Audio Controller (rev 02) If you turn up the volume on your speakers to the max and max out all the relevant software volume sliders you will hear faint sound coming from the speakers. It appears that pulseaudio has a scaling problem when talking to HD audio. This bug has been around for almost a year. Here is the first hit that google coughed up for me: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/192040 The fix is to remove all packages related to pulseaudio. -wolfgang -- Wolfgang S. Rupprecht http://www.full-steam.org/ (ipv6-only) You may need to config 6to4 to see the above pages. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: samba setup on F10?
On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 08:45:44 -0500, Gene wrote: Greetings; In attempting to setup a samba share on this box, I ssh'd into it and edited the /etc/samba/smb.conf file to add a share, then tried to restart smb and nmb. Not found errors. Looking into /etc/initd.d, indeed they weren't present. So I did a yum install samba* and it installed several new packages. So my question is, how the heck did it install an /etc/samba directory, but none of the rest of the samba kit? You can find our yourself. Run: rpm -qa --last | grep ^samba repoquery --whatprovides /etc/samba repoquery --whatprovides /etc/samba/smb.conf -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: I need Miredo for F10
A further option considering Miredo is an open-source Teredo IPv6 tunneling software for...[1], would be to snag a copy of the source to Miredo[2] and build it on F10... of course that assumes that the software has something sort of nice like a configure script to let the OP know that they need more 'devel' packages and that the OP understands what the configure script is asking for. But the more top-level question is WHY Isn't the Fedora built-in IPv6 networking up to the task? -wolfgang -- Wolfgang S. Rupprecht http://www.full-steam.org/ (ipv6-only) You may need to config 6to4 to see the above pages. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Getting actual source for a kernel
On Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 07:24:28PM -0500, Tom Horsley wrote: On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 19:10:44 -0500 Bill Davidsen wrote: Please read this entire question before giving me the obvious answer... This obvious answer? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Building_a_custom_kernel If you do just rpmbuild -bp, you'll get a kernel source tree with all the patches applied over in the BUILD subdir. By the way, if you find something unclear in that document, please bring it to our attention and we'll see about clarifying it. -- Paul W. Frieldshttp://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug pgpAQ2DvJTY04.pgp Description: PGP signature -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: cups failed last week, now amanda
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 08:54:41AM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: And the cups update to fix a denial of service that yumex did last night, now is a denial of service, my logs are drowning in: Can you add a rule to your firewall that drops all IP6 traffic? -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: F9 does not boot this morning
On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 13:34 -0500, Dave Feustel wrote: I ran the yum command as root and it reported no errors. But when I switched back to X-windows there was yet another error popup reporting update PackageKit failed to reset the client. I'm getting that popup window in bunches of 3 for two days or so now. You want this update: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/PackageKit-0.3.12-1.fc9,gnome-packagekit-0.3.12-3.fc9,kpackagekit-0.3.1-6.fc9 Karma appreciated. Richard. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
iocharset on fc10 mount -o option
I installed the Fedora 10, and I have a vfat win32 partition, when I mount this vfat partition with -o iocharset option, I found that no matter iocharset setting to any charset, it uses utf8! Is this buggy of fc10? Does anyone know how to fix this problem? Thanks Joseph Wang -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: F9 does not boot this morning
On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 10:56 +, Richard Hughes wrote: On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 13:34 -0500, Dave Feustel wrote: I ran the yum command as root and it reported no errors. But when I switched back to X-windows there was yet another error popup reporting update PackageKit failed to reset the client. I'm getting that popup window in bunches of 3 for two days or so now. You want this update: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/PackageKit-0.3.12-1.fc9,gnome-packagekit-0.3.12-3.fc9,kpackagekit-0.3.1-6.fc9 Karma appreciated. Richard. Currently these will not innstall because of missing dependencies: PackageKit-yum = 0.3.12-1.fc9 PackageKit-udev-helper = 0.3.12-1.fc9 libpackagekit-glib.so.11 PackageKit-libs = 0.3.11 PackageKit-glib = 0.3.12-1.fc9 Is it just too early or am I missing something? Pun intended. -- === Ocean: A body of water occupying about two-thirds of a world made for man -- who has no gills. -- Ambrose Bierce === Aaron Konstam telephone: (210) 656-0355 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Xorg CPU Hog
Your excellencies, I have a brand new install of F10 on a reasonably fast desktop. The only apps are FF 3.0.4 that came with the install and VNC, also came with the install. It's painful to watch the screen repaint. Through googling, I saw some discussion out there. I just want to report it here and see if anyone has any idea? Tnx... -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
What is Judy?
I am trying to build Miredo 1.1.5 (http://www.remlab.net/miredo/devel.shtml.en) I have followed the rpmbuild instructions from: http://www.owlriver.com/tips/non-root/ (after all, I am principally a Centos person, and know where to find out htings about Centos and figured this will not be different in F10), and have the miredo source in ~/build/miredo-1.1.5. I run ./configure (as the INSTALL text file tells me to do) and get the error: checking for Judy.h usablity... no checking for Judy.h presence... no checking for Judy.h... no configure: WARING: If you don't care about scalability, re-run configure with ' --without-Judy'. configure: error: Required Judy dynamic arrays library missing. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: What is Judy?
Robert Moskowitz wrote, at 12/11/2008 12:14 AM +9:00: I am trying to build Miredo 1.1.5 (http://www.remlab.net/miredo/devel.shtml.en) I have followed the rpmbuild instructions from: http://www.owlriver.com/tips/non-root/ (after all, I am principally a Centos person, and know where to find out htings about Centos and figured this will not be different in F10), and have the miredo source in ~/build/miredo-1.1.5. I run ./configure (as the INSTALL text file tells me to do) and get the error: checking for Judy.h usablity... no checking for Judy.h presence... no checking for Judy.h... no configure: WARING: If you don't care about scalability, re-run configure with ' --without-Judy'. configure: error: Required Judy dynamic arrays library missing. Judy is https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465897 By the way miredo is: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437626 Mamoru -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Fedora 10 ypbind error
Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve wrote, On 12/09/2008 02:38 PM: Hi Dave, I think you are correct, the invalid source port is indeed unrelated. You're not very specific. I am guessing that NIS is not working? Can you nudge it into making more error messages, maybe execute 'ypcat passwd'? Result of '/etc/init.d/ypbind status'? # /etc/init.d/ypbind start SIOCADDRT: File exists Starting NIS service: [ OK ] Binding NIS service: ... [ OK ] # ypcat passwd No such map passwd.byname. Reason: Can't bind to server which serves this domain Q1: network up before starting NIS? (watch out for NetworkMangler^H^H^H^Hager starting only after someone logs in.) Q2: can you ping the NIS server or its backups? Q3: portmapper running? chkconfig --list portmap http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg75448.html another command to add to your yp test suite: ypwhich Please keep us posted... some of us still have to deal with that system a bit longer. -- Todd Denniston Crane Division, Naval Surface Warfare Center (NSWC Crane) Harnessing the Power of Technology for the Warfighter -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Network Manager PPTP Incorrect Routes
When I connect to my VPN using Network Manager, I end up with the wrong route table. Here's what I start with: Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt Iface 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0 0.0.0.0 192.168.0.1 0.0.0.0 UG0 0 0 eth0 After connecting, I get this: Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt Iface 65.237.0.254192.168.0.1 255.255.255.255 UGH 0 0 0 eth0 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 ppp0 The 65.237.0.254 (obfuscated) is my VPN server. I don't think it should appear in my route table. There's no reason for that. Also, the default route has been changed to ppp0. I don't want that. The nm-applet pretends to let me ignore automatically obtained routes but that doesn't affect the default route change. From my /var/log/messages file, I can see the endpoint of the tunnel: Dec 10 08:13:06 localhost pppd[5046]: local IP address 10.6.250.118 Dec 10 08:13:06 localhost pppd[5046]: remote IP address 10.6.250.25 I would expect the 10.6.250.25 to appear in the route table, if anything. Here's what I do manually to get back to normal: sudo route add -net 10.6.0.0 netmask 255.255.0.0 dev ppp0 sudo route add -net default gw 192.168.0.1 sudo route del -net default dev ppp0 Now I have: Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt Iface 64.238.111.254 192.168.0.1 255.255.255.255 UGH 0 0 0 eth0 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0 10.6.0.00.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 0 0 0 ppp0 0.0.0.0 192.168.0.1 0.0.0.0 UG0 0 0 eth0 and all works fine. The nm-applet doesn't have a way to control my default route and won't let me route my private networks via an interface -- the routes I can add insist on an IP address for the gateway. Is this a bug? How can I manually configure my routes in a configuration file? -- Garry T. Williams --- +1 678 656-4579 -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Experience with x86_64-only (no i386) in F10?
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 4:43 AM, Niels Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2008/12/9 Patrick O'Callaghan [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 10:54 AM, Niels Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2008/12/9 Patrick O'Callaghan [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 4:52 AM, Niels Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: All 32bit binary programs you want to run will not work. I think you mean not all 32-bit programs you want to run will work. All dynamically linked 32bit programs will not work. Is that better? That depends on what you mean. You're saying that no dynamically-linked 32-bit program will work. If you mean that some will and some won't, then that's not what you're saying. I'm talking of those you don't get the source for obviously. If I'm wrong in that, please explain how such a program would work. By linking to 32-bit libraries? Multilib support is precisely for this situation, as far as I'm aware. I've never had a 32-bit app fail to run on my 64-bit system, e.g. 32-bit Firefox works fine (though I now use the 64-bit version). poc -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Fedora 10 ctf-alt-F2
Jeff Spaleta wrote: On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 2:43 PM, Patrick Dupre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, Since I moved from Fedora 7 to Fedora 10, I lost the functionality of the ctl-alt-Fx in a X session. In text mode every works fine, but from a X session, it breaks jsut the session. thank for your help. Hmm. switching to virtual consoles tty2 through tty6 works for me using the keyboard shortcuts. in F10 runlevel 5 the X session now starts on the first virtual terminal which is mapped to ALT-CTRL-F1 but the second virtual terminal at ALT-CTRL-F2 should still exist as a console login. run this command: ps aux |grep mingetty you should see mingetty running on tty2 through tty6 by default if you started in runlevel 5. Each running mingetty instance should provide a login prompt I have two machines - F8 and F10. On the F8 machine, my main X session is on Ctrl-Alt-F7, as expected. However, my wife has an X session running on Ctrl-Alt-F9, which she got via Switch User. We have been going back and forth like that for weeks. On my F10 machine, my main X session is on Ctrl-Alt-F1, as expected. However, Ctrl-Alt-F2 (or switch user) bring me to a console login. Trying to startx tells me that Server is already active for display 0 and recommends deleting the /tmp/.X-lock file. I don't want to do that and disable my main session; I want a second X session as another user. Any of the Ctrl-Alt-Fn combinations don't seem to help here. Is this no longer possible in F10? The upgrade of my home desktop depends upon this functionality. -Don -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Gnome and kde terminals in F10
Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: In kde I, cannot use konsole transparency anymore. I tried konsole --force-transparency, but no difference (in gnome I have transparency). This is an Intel onboard video. KDE 4 does not support fake transparency hacks anymore. You have to enable desktop effects (i.e. KWin compositing) in systemsettings (or use compiz-kde, but KWin is preferred) to get support for transparency. Kevin Kofler -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: sata_nv OK in f10?
Tim wrote: On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 19:35 -0500, Kevin J. Cummings wrote: I don't know if its the disk, the system's power supply, or the chipset. But I *have* lost 2 other HDs in the same machine (120GB and 40GB) Or crap disc drives? I won't touch western digital drives, any more. I've had several of them die with a very short life span, in several different computers. These are all Maxtors which have died or are dying. My WD SATAs are just fine. Overheating is also a problem, some of them get damn hot, and start behaving badly. Putting a fan in front of the drives in one of my systems solved random computer stuff-ups. I have a case fan blowing over all of my hard drives. It could still be heat, but the SMART stuff isn't user friendly enough to say *why* the SMART test is failing. But if you have a drive killing system, I'd try and find the cause, rather than just put up with it. I wish the system would just TELL me what's wrong, other than just something's wrong. sigh -- Kevin J. Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Registered Linux User #1232 (http://counter.li.org) -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Xorg CPU Hog
On 12/10/2008 10:42 AM, Chan wrote: Your excellencies, I have a brand new install of F10 on a reasonably fast desktop. The only apps are FF 3.0.4 that came with the install and VNC, also came with the install. It's painful to watch the screen repaint. Through googling, I saw some discussion out there. I just want to report it here and see if anyone has any idea? If you want useful information, you need to say at least what video card you have and what desktop you're using. poc -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
cups server
For years now, I have used a Linux server to provide print services to networks for various clients whether Linux, Macintosh or Windows and it has worked well. One of my clients got a Konica-Minolta BizHub C550 and the Macintosh computers had a problem with certain features - most notably, scaling to fit while landscape and so we downloaded the Macintosh specific client driver and PPD seems to fix that issue EXCEPT that it specific to Macintosh. At the top of the PPD, it lists... *APDialogExtension: /Library/Printers/KONICAMINOLTA/C650/PDEs/KONICA MINOLTA C650 Output.plugin *APDialogExtension: /Library/Printers/KONICAMINOLTA/C650/PDEs/KONICA MINOLTA C650 Finishing.plugin *APDialogExtension: /Library/Printers/KONICAMINOLTA/C650/PDEs/KONICA MINOLTA C650 Tray.plugin *APDialogExtension: /Library/Printers/KONICAMINOLTA/C650/PDEs/KONICA MINOLTA C650 Cover.plugin *APDialogExtension: /Library/Printers/KONICAMINOLTA/C650/PDEs/KONICA MINOLTA C650 PerPage.plugin *APDialogExtension: /Library/Printers/KONICAMINOLTA/C650/PDEs/KONICA MINOLTA C650 Stamp.plugin *APDialogExtension: /Library/Printers/KONICAMINOLTA/C650/PDEs/KONICA MINOLTA C650 ImageQuality.plugin *cupsFilter: application/vnd.cups-postscript 0 /Library/Printers/KONICAMINOLTA/C650/Filters/psToKMC650PS so when I load this particular PPD into cups on Linux, there is no such path and obviously no such plugins. While I could probably copy the 'plugins' from the Macintosh as I have copied the PPD, I need to reconcile this for all the Linux users as well as the Macintosh users. Does anyone have a suggestion on how to proceed so I can have happy users without running around to each Macintosh to install this Macintosh specific driver and thus render the cups server obsolete for Macintosh users? Craig -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: can't use yum
I added the line about proxy in my /etc/yum.conf but with no result. I also want to say that I inserted the info about the proxy in my .bash_profile as, #yum export http_proxy=http://:; [1] I also inform you that if I run: nm-tool I got as reply : ... NetworkManager Tool State: disconnected - Device: eth0 Type: Wired Driver:sky2 State: unmanaged HW Address:00:00:00:00:00:00 Capabilities: Supported: yes Carrier Detect: yes Speed: 100 Mb/s Wired Settings If I understand correctly that's the proof that yum does not see my connection. but remember... I surf internet, services like network, ypbind, NetworkManager are running... so what's to do? Thank you for the quick reply Links: -- [1] http://lt;proxy_addressgt;:lt;portgt;quot; -- This is an email sent via The Fedora Community Portal https://fcp.surfsite.org https://fcp.surfsite.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?post_id=310685topic_id=65209forum=10#forumpost310685 If you think, this is spam, please report this to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and/or blame [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: What is Judy?
Mamoru Tasaka wrote: Robert Moskowitz wrote, at 12/11/2008 12:14 AM +9:00: I am trying to build Miredo 1.1.5 (http://www.remlab.net/miredo/devel.shtml.en) I have followed the rpmbuild instructions from: http://www.owlriver.com/tips/non-root/ (after all, I am principally a Centos person, and know where to find out htings about Centos and figured this will not be different in F10), and have the miredo source in ~/build/miredo-1.1.5. I run ./configure (as the INSTALL text file tells me to do) and get the error: checking for Judy.h usablity... no checking for Judy.h presence... no checking for Judy.h... no configure: WARING: If you don't care about scalability, re-run configure with ' --without-Judy'. configure: error: Required Judy dynamic arrays library missing. Judy is https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465897 By the way miredo is: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437626 Thanks. Well I only need the miredo client for F10, so I might skip Judy and only do a make install. But if I can get some good hand-holding, I could build this rpm. Where do I put the Judy c library after downloading if from sourceforge (where I was pointed to for it)? I hope it will work 'out of the box'! I am also building this on Centos, and already tried to do a 'make rpm' and it failed. And I don't see a spec file (which might be part of the reason for the failure). So I expect 'make rpm' to fail in F10 as well. So a little guidance would help. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Error with updates addressing PackageKit issues
Since yesterday there have been PackageKit package updates available for Fedora 10 which I assume address the issues a number of people have been reporting. However, since yesterday, when trying to update I get the following error: Missing Dependency: libpackagekit-glib.so.10 is needed by package gnome-packagekit-0.3.9-8.fc10.i386 (installed) Does this mean that I need to un-install this package, or is there a problem with the mirror or something else entirely that causes this issue? Thanks. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: I need Miredo for F10
Robert Moskowitz wrote, On 12/10/2008 08:08 AM: Todd Denniston wrote: A further option considering Miredo is an open-source Teredo IPv6 tunneling software for...[1], would be to snag a copy of the source to Miredo[2] and build it on F10... of course that assumes that the software has something sort of nice like a configure script to let the OP know that they need more 'devel' packages and that the OP understands what the configure script is asking for. And there is the crux of the problem. If it is not a plug-n-pay build, it will take me a day to pull off, and I have other fish to fry on this project right now. I will try and reach the builder and get them to look into this. As I don't have need for Miredo nor do I have an F10 install setting around yet, there is no point in me pulling Miredo sources and trying... BUT Often if you pull the source of a project, untar it, and type ./configure; it will either fully configure and be ready for a `make;make install` or spew out a 'could not find package BLAA' [which means you need to do `yum install BLAA-devel`] and have it figured out in less than an hour. If Miredo uses pretty much standard libraries, it is unlikely that you will even need to install any extra devel packages. i.e., give it a go ... I think you could be lucky :) [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miredo [2] http://www.remlab.net/files/miredo/?C=N;O=D -- Todd Denniston Crane Division, Naval Surface Warfare Center (NSWC Crane) Harnessing the Power of Technology for the Warfighter -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Error with updates addressing PackageKit issues
Doctor Who wrote: Missing Dependency: libpackagekit-glib.so.10 is needed by package gnome-packagekit-0.3.9-8.fc10.i386 (installed) Does this mean that I need to un-install this package, or is there a problem with the mirror or something else entirely that causes this issue? I believe that a new package is in the pipeline which fixes this... just be patient and it will get through to the mirrors in a day or so -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Error-with-updates-addressing-PackageKit-issues-tp20937734p20937773.html Sent from the Fedora List mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: asus w5f Intel sound on Fedora 10
On Tuesday 09 December 2008 21:56, sfilippo wrote: Taken out alsa-plugins-pulseaudio from a fresh install, no luck. This is the output: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [1] ~]# cat /proc/asound/cards 0 [Intel ]: HDA-Intel - HDA Intel HDA Intel at 0xfeb38000 irq 16 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2] ~]# grep ^Codec /proc/asound/card?/codec* Codec: Motorola Si3054 Hi Salvatore. I think that the problem is with the codec, which is for a sound component on a modem. There are some problematic drivers that insist on grabbing card0, and as the actual soundcard uses card0, the soundcard is not able to be initiated. You could check this out on your FC 7 install. In a terminal type as below, and you should see a different codec listed, which is the actual one for the soundcard, and would be why sounds are working on FC7, and earlier. If that is so, we now need to stop the Motorola one grabbing card0. grep ^Codec /proc/asound/card?/codec* The easiest thing to try is to add a line to /etc/modprobe.conf, if it exists. If modprobe.conf doesn't exist on F10, create the file, and add a line like the example below. options snd-usb-audio index=-2 You'll need to change snd-usb-audio for the driver that is for this modem. The -2 means that instead of the driver grabbing card0, it will use any other slot available, apart from card0, thereby allowing the actual soundcard to use card0. Type /sbin/lsmod in a terminal, and see if you can see the module for this modem. It will probably have an m at the end of it's name. If you can identify it, exchange snd-usb-audio on the example line above with the one you think is correct. Next, pray, and then reboot, and see if the sounds work on F10. Would you post me the full output from running /sbin/lsmod. It may help me if this problem shows up in the future on someone else's machine. Also would you say if /etc/modprobe.conf exists on a fresh install of F10, or whether you have had to create the file. All the best. Nigel. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: asus w5f Intel sound on Fedora 10
Hmm. Isn't it the case that all normal multimedia packages require pulseaudio to produce sound, and therefore would be effectively disabled??? -- This is an email sent via The Fedora Community Portal https://fcp.surfsite.org https://fcp.surfsite.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?post_id=310702topic_id=65200forum=10#forumpost310702 If you think, this is spam, please report this to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and/or blame [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Error with updates addressing PackageKit issues
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 10:52 AM, Mike Cloaked [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Doctor Who wrote: Missing Dependency: libpackagekit-glib.so.10 is needed by package gnome-packagekit-0.3.9-8.fc10.i386 (installed) Does this mean that I need to un-install this package, or is there a problem with the mirror or something else entirely that causes this issue? I believe that a new package is in the pipeline which fixes this... just be patient and it will get through to the mirrors in a day or so I should have mentioned that the error message received was from yumex and had nothing to do with PackageKit itself. So perhaps the original question remains. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: packagekit problem on F10
I had the same issue. system-config-services was broken too. You have to update, from the updates-testing repo, these packages: PackageKit-yum-0.3.11-4.fc10.i386 PackageKit-yum-plugin-0.3.11-4.fc10.i386 I recommend these too: yum-3.2.20-5.fc10.noarch PolicyKit-0.9-4.fc10.i386 On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 03:47, fred smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just tonight when I try add/remove software and choose a category or enter a search string I'm getting an error dialog that contains: Failed to get a TID: A security policy in place prevents this sender from sending this message to this recipient, see message bus configuration file (rejected message had interface org.freedesktop.PackageKit.Transaction member SetLocale error name (unset) destination org.freedesktop.PackageKit) (0) I HAD added samba client to trusted services in the firewall configuration app, but that's all I changed. I've tried to restore the default workstation options, but that didn't help any. [later...] just disabled the firewall and that didn't fix it. so,... Does someone know what I've screwed up now, and more importantly how to solve it? Thanks! -- Fred Smith -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Do you not know? Have you not heard? The LORD is the everlasting God, the Creator of the ends of the earth. He will not grow tired or weary, and his understanding no one can fathom. - Isaiah 40:28 (niv) - -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
