Re: From the top... how do I get sound working in F11 ?

2009-07-30 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Sat, 25 Jul 2009 19:39:25 -0700, stan wrote:

 I'm probably not the person to be defending pulse, because I leave it
 installed but disabled.

Is there a bullet-proof way to do that? Disabling PulseAudio is a FAQ for
Fedora, openSUSE, and Ubuntu, too. The suggested setting autospawn = no
in /etc/pulse/client.conf plus running pulseaudio -k plus configuring
audio players to use alsa drivers doesn't work for all users. Last time I
tried it myself, I got socket errors and no audio. I had to run yum -y
remove pulseaudio as a work-around to actually remove several deps, too.

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: From the top... how do I get sound working in F11 ?

2009-07-30 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Thursday 30 July 2009 10:20:57 Michael Schwendt wrote:
 On Sat, 25 Jul 2009 19:39:25 -0700, stan wrote:
  I'm probably not the person to be defending pulse, because I leave it
  installed but disabled.

 Is there a bullet-proof way to do that? Disabling PulseAudio is a FAQ for
 Fedora, openSUSE, and Ubuntu, too. The suggested setting autospawn = no
 in /etc/pulse/client.conf plus running pulseaudio -k plus configuring
 audio players to use alsa drivers doesn't work for all users. Last time I
 tried it myself, I got socket errors and no audio. I had to run yum -y
 remove pulseaudio as a work-around to actually remove several deps, too.

How about starting pasuspender in a clever way somewhere in, say, .login? It 
would need some dummy never-ending process as a mandatory argument, but I'm 
sure that can be figured out easily.

man pasuspender

I mean, if you are determined to hack your system to not use pa for sound, the 
cleanest way would be to use the off switch provided by the pa itself, right?

However, I believe you still need to manually configure audio players to use 
alsa drivers.

HTH, :-)
Marko


-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: From the top... how do I get sound working in F11 ?

2009-07-30 Thread Mikkel L. Ellertson
Michael Schwendt wrote:
 On Sat, 25 Jul 2009 19:39:25 -0700, stan wrote:
 
 I'm probably not the person to be defending pulse, because I leave it
 installed but disabled.
 
 Is there a bullet-proof way to do that? Disabling PulseAudio is a FAQ for
 Fedora, openSUSE, and Ubuntu, too. The suggested setting autospawn = no
 in /etc/pulse/client.conf plus running pulseaudio -k plus configuring
 audio players to use alsa drivers doesn't work for all users. Last time I
 tried it myself, I got socket errors and no audio. I had to run yum -y
 remove pulseaudio as a work-around to actually remove several deps, too.
 
How about going to the list of programs that are started when you
log in, and unchecking PA? I have not tried it, as PA works for me,
but it should work.

Mikkel
-- 

  Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons,
for thou art crunchy and taste good with Ketchup!



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Re: From the top... how do I get sound working in F11 ?

2009-07-30 Thread stan
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 11:20:57 +0200
Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Sat, 25 Jul 2009 19:39:25 -0700, stan wrote:
 
  I'm probably not the person to be defending pulse, because I leave it
  installed but disabled.
 
 Is there a bullet-proof way to do that? Disabling PulseAudio is a FAQ for

Well, I *thought* there was, but yesterday I was using gnash to listen to sound 
samples on http://www.freesound.org and I noticed that pulseaudio was running.  
Looks like I will have to log in and download the samples I want to listen to.  
Better anyway because then there is no distortion from mp3. ;-)

 Fedora, openSUSE, and Ubuntu, too. The suggested setting autospawn = no
 in /etc/pulse/client.conf plus running pulseaudio -k plus configuring
 audio players to use alsa drivers doesn't work for all users. Last time I
 tried it myself, I got socket errors and no audio. I had to run yum -y
 remove pulseaudio as a work-around to actually remove several deps, too.

In addition to the steps you took, it is necessary to go into the directory 
/etc/alsa and (re)move the file
pulse-default.conf.  That file sets pulse to be the default alsa audio device, 
thus spawning it anytime some
application tries to use the alsa default device, even when the application is 
set to alsa.  That would explain your
errors if pulse isn't available.  Note that it is reinstalled anytime pulse is 
updated.

With this additional step, I find that I can use alsa for audio with pulse 
still installed.  I don't use system sounds as I find them an annoyance rather 
than an aid, so pulse isn't being spawned all the time.

However, I notice a trend that windowing interfaces are expecting to use pulse 
exclusively for any sound applications they include.  System sounds, gnash, 
etc. are designed without alsa access as an option.  So my fallback plan is to 
have two sound devices.  Use the onboard, not so great sound device for pulse.  
Use my more sophisticated card strictly with alsa (leave pulse ignorant of it). 
 When I work with sound I want exclusive sound, sound configured explicitly, 
and having a dedicated device allows this.

My take is that pulse has its place for some people and situations, but it 
isn't for serious sound.  There it just introduces another layer to deal with, 
and doesn't provide any benefit.  It reminds me of an MS windows application, 
providing reasonable functionality without much effort, and some cool factor or 
whiz bang.  The equivalent of desktop effects, except for sound.  And there is 
a user base for that.  

I'm not sure if there aren't other ways of doing things, or if the developers 
just aren't creative, but linux seems to just copy MS windows in its 
development.  Pulse seems to be a part of this trend, so I'll have to learn to 
live with it.

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: From the top... how do I get sound working in F11 ?

2009-07-27 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Sunday 26 July 2009 22:29:32 Bill Davidsen wrote:
 The scary thing is that you don't see anything wrong with this picture,
 seven volume control, mixers, and device selectors, and also two config
 files.

Have you ever visited a radio station studio or a TV studio? Do you know how 
many mixer tables and boards are there, and how complicated they can be?

I, for one, would *want* to have a volume control and mixer app for every 
sound card I have on the system, and in addition another set of such apps for 
every sound source app I use. That way, I can fine-tune all the 
playback/recording I might wish for.

If you want simplistic setup (the one-volume-knob-for-all setup), go install 
Windows and click the small speaker image in its system tray --- a single 
slider will show up for you to turn the volume up or down. That is simplistic.

Fedora (and Linux in general) is about ability to *have choice*, and that 
comes with the price of complexity. One could also ask the same question for 
the X window system --- why do we need a full-blown network-capable multi-user 
multi-output multi-this multi-that video server? An average user has one 
graphics card, one monitor, and doesn't use X over network. So one could say 
it would be better to have some lightweight graphics server that only does the 
typical stuff, while advanced users could install X optionally.

But this did not and will not happen in Linux, at least not in Fedora, because 
Fedora users *like* to have a full-fledged complicated server as default at 
their disposal to tweak as they see fit. Think pulseaudio. Think X. Think 
sendmail. Think apache. Think selinux. Think udev, hal, pam, ssh... All these 
complicated servers have more simplistic alternatives, but these more 
simplistic ones also limit the user's ability to configure complicated setups. 
And having this ability is what Linux is all about.

Imagine someone who has trouble setting up resolution or other parameters in X 
for his particular hardware. And he comes to the list and bitches that X is 
bullshit, way too complicated, lacks documentation, and should be installed 
only optionally, for users that have a need for it. Would you support him and 
advocate the removal of X from the default distro? I know I wouldn't.

Ditto for pulseaudio. It does have a steep learning curve, but so does X if 
you want to mess with it. And please don't tell me that X has only one config 
file.

Best, :-)
Marko


-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: From the top... how do I get sound working in F11 ?

2009-07-26 Thread Bill Davidsen

Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:

Bill Davidsen wrote:

Four of six had simple output to the laptop speakers work after install,
the two  desktops had two channel from the sound card, no setting I've
found will enable the other speakers from any source, even on hardware
which had 5.1 with Windows and FC6.


You may want to look at:
http://pulseaudio.org/wiki/FAQ#Troubleshooting

I have a surround sound card, but PulseAudio uses just the front
speakers!

Many people have a surround card, but have speakers for just two
channels, so PulseAudio can't really default to a surround setup. To
enable all the channels, edit /etc/pulse/daemon.conf: uncomment the
default-sample-channels line (i.e. remove the semicolon from the
beginning of the line) and set the value to 6 if you have a 5.1
setup, or 8 if you have 7.1 setup etc. After doing the edit, restart
pulseaudio.

The scary thing is that you don't see anything wrong with this picture, seven 
volume control, mixers, and device selectors, and also two config files.


--
Bill Davidsen david...@tmr.com
  We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked.  - from Slashdot

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: From the top... how do I get sound working in F11 ?

2009-07-26 Thread Bill Davidsen

Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:

Bill Davidsen wrote:

Craig White wrote:

On Fri, 2009-07-24 at 19:31 -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote:

If it doesn't work out of the box there are no tools to ever make it
work, which is why PA should be in the toybox, not the default.


ignoring the reality that PA works for most people out of the box, I
would agree with you but I can't ignore the reality. It works for me. It
has worked for me on every computer I have installed Fedora on. It works
for me on every computer I have installed Ubuntu on.


So tools to correct the cases which don't work out of the box and can't
be made to work are not needed because it works most of the time? What
do we need this Linux for anyway, after all Windows works most of the
time...


There are tools, but they are not really dedicated Pulse Audio
tools. You have to go to the Pulse Audio web side that read the
documentation there. (I don't have the link handy, but I posted it
in this thread already.) The one time I had problems, it was an Alsa
configuration problem after an upgrade... (/etc/asound.conf problem.)

There are things like the Pulse Audio volume meters that can tell
you if the signal is getting to pa. The pa volume control can tell
you a lot more about what is going on. For a lot more information,
but harder to understand, there is the device chooser and audio manager.

When you drop down to the Alsa layer, there are tools like aplay and
amixer. There is also alsa-info. System-config-sound mostly works
with this layer. Then there are the assorted volume controls. I use
the standard Gnome volume control, and it offers different sets of
mixer controls, depending on what level/card you are trying to control.

Yes, it can get complicated, especially if you have several sound
cards, and you want to direct different sources to different cards.
But I think the flexibility is worth it.

If this was optional I might agree, but the assumption that the standard sound 
config should use seven sound tools and two config files when the typical user 
has been playing one source to two speakers since 1.2.13/oss days is divorced 
from reality.


--
Bill Davidsen david...@tmr.com
  We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked.  - from Slashdot

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: From the top... how do I get sound working in F11 ?

2009-07-26 Thread Bill Davidsen

Craig White wrote:

On Sat, 2009-07-25 at 19:34 -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote:

Craig White wrote:

On Fri, 2009-07-24 at 19:31 -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote:

If it doesn't work out of the box there are no tools to ever make it
work, which 
is why PA should be in the toybox, not the default.


ignoring the reality that PA works for most people out of the box, I
would agree with you but I can't ignore the reality. It works for me. It
has worked for me on every computer I have installed Fedora on. It works
for me on every computer I have installed Ubuntu on.

So tools to correct the cases which don't work out of the box and can't be made 
to work are not needed because it works most of the time? What do we need this 
Linux for anyway, after all Windows works most of the time...


you make less sense every time you get deeper into this discussion.

If you think Windows is less trouble, you should use Windows. I don't
have a problem with that.

If you think pulse audio is a problem, then don't use it. I have no
problem with that.

pulse audio is little more than a collection layer for audio from
various sources. I am fairly convinced that most of the griping I see on
this list about pulse audio has less to do with pulse audio than people
having trouble getting their Intel motherboard audio to work properly.
Pulseaudio just seems to be a convenient spot to focus one's blame.

When sound worked with FC4 and FC6 (and in some cases FC9) and no Intel boards 
are involved I think you're trying hard to sweep this udner the rug.



I recognize that it is frustrating to have problems, even regressions
with new releases of Fedora but you have to keep in mind that the
kernel, the kernel modules and of course the underlying software is
still in a rapid state of change and the way to make it work for
yourself and everyone else behind you is to perform diligent bug
reports.

I keep in mind that this has been getting worse, not better, since PA was 
introduced. I care not that it exists, only that it is standard rather than some 
collection of optional stuff people can install if they need it.



If you think that I don't understand these issues, I have had bug
reports about not being able to boot Optiplex 320's via grub since
Fedora 7.

The problem with open source, when people have no reward for giving the user 
what they want rather than what the developer wants and taking the attitude that 
it's free if you don't like it don't use it. Also the attitude that developers 
write code and lesser beings write documentation. PA is a solution most people 
don't need, in search of a problem most people don't have.


--
Bill Davidsen david...@tmr.com
  We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked.  - from Slashdot

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: From the top... how do I get sound working in F11 ?

2009-07-26 Thread Mikkel L. Ellertson
Bill Davidsen wrote:
 The scary thing is that you don't see anything wrong with this picture,
 seven volume control, mixers, and device selectors, and also two config
 files.
 
I have always had more then one volume control. The fact that they
control the same device is beside the point. One thing I think you
are overlooking is that if you are using only sound source, you only
need the Alsa mixer. You can leave the PA controls at max. When you
start mixing more then one source through the same output, then you
may have to adjust the input for each source. When you are
outputting to more then one card, you may need to adjust the volume
on each output.

As far as config files, you probably have more then two. I know I
have the Alsa config, the PA config, and config for various players.
Then again, if you want to see complicated, look at all the config
files you need for networking. Or look at all the config files for
Gnome, KDE, or the collection of window managers. Even Posfix has
more then one config file. What would bother me is if they tried to
combine all the config files into one file. Windows uses that
method, and you know what a mess the registry is.

Mikkel
-- 

  Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons,
for thou art crunchy and taste good with Ketchup!



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Re: From the top... how do I get sound working in F11 ?

2009-07-26 Thread Mikkel L. Ellertson
Bill Davidsen wrote:
 Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:

 Yes, it can get complicated, especially if you have several sound
 cards, and you want to direct different sources to different cards.
 But I think the flexibility is worth it.

 If this was optional I might agree, but the assumption that the standard
 sound config should use seven sound tools and two config files when the
 typical user has been playing one source to two speakers since
 1.2.13/oss days is divorced from reality.
 
Well, if you don't want it, you can turn it off on a per user basis
by un-checking one check box, unless you set it up as system wide
service, instead of hte default per user server.

The thing is, the typical user wants to do a lot more then that now
days. Things like a video from a web site in a web browser, an alert
when they get an IM, new mail, or an incoming call. Or they may be
playing an incoming audio stream. There are users who have surround
sound or digital output connected. Then you have the people that
that want to redirect the audio from one computer over the network
to another computer.

Sound usage is changing, and the software is changing to meet the
new demands. All the arguments and complaints reminds me of the
change to udev. I heard a lot of the same complaints.

Mikkel
-- 

  Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons,
for thou art crunchy and taste good with Ketchup!



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Re: From the top... how do I get sound working in F11 ?

2009-07-25 Thread Anne Wilson
On Saturday 25 July 2009 00:31:09 Bill Davidsen wrote:
 PA is too damn fragile to use unless you are one of the few
 who has it work out of the box.

It's a funny thing, but I have three very different systems where PA has worked 
perfectly out-of-the-box.  I'm not denying that some people have problems, but 
going by my experience there must be many that don't.  Of course you never 
hear from them ;-)

Anne


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Re: From the top... how do I get sound working in F11 ?

2009-07-25 Thread Tim
On Sat, 2009-07-25 at 09:46 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
 I have three very different systems where PA has worked 
 perfectly out-of-the-box.

Same here.

   I'm not denying that some people have problems, but 
 going by my experience there must be many that don't.

And again.

-- 
[...@localhost ~]$ uname -r
2.6.27.25-78.2.56.fc9.i686

Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored.  I
read messages from the public lists.



-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: From the top... how do I get sound working in F11 ?

2009-07-25 Thread Bill Davidsen

Marko Vojinovic wrote:

On Saturday 25 July 2009 01:48:05 Jeff Spaleta wrote:

I will say that in this case..that a fresh install would be extremely
advisable. Following lots of well-meaning troubleshooting from lots of
different people for days and weeks to solve the same problem ends up
leaving your system in a very strange state.


Precisely!

I haven't checked it first-hand, but I do have a hunch that people who 
experience problems with sound are mainly the people who did an upgrade from 
F10, while previously fiddled with F10 configuration in order to get the sound 
working.


All of my six (so far) systems using FC11 were clean installs, four from LiveCD, 
one from DVD, one from DVD image NFS mounted. Oh, and a test install from USB 
made from the snapshot DVD, on one of those machines later reinstalled.


Four of six had simple output to the laptop speakers work after install, the two 
 desktops had two channel from the sound card, no setting I've found will 
enable the other speakers from any source, even on hardware which had 5.1 with 
Windows and FC6.


While people on the list may or may not know what settings you have fiddled 
around while troubleshooting, anaconda *definitely* cannot handle such 
strangely configured systems while upgrading. AFAIK, it assumes a more-or-less 
default F10 installation, where under-the-hood things haven't been customized 
beyond some sane level.


So the first thing I would ask when troubleshooting F11 audio problems is did 
you do an upgrade from F10? and if yes, was PA working for you out-of-the-
box in F10?. This is just a hunch, but I bet 90% of people with problems 
would fail to answer yes to the latter question. In that case, the only sane 
thing to assume is that their system had broken configuration to begin with, 
when upgrading to F11. And anaconda tries to *keep* any custom-configured 
things in the system (which is the whole point of upgrading), and thus create 
even more problems.


Your point about upgrade is well taken, three of the six worked worse after 
upgrade from the install media to current using either yum (cli) or the update 
menu item. Go figure.


There is a simple test to these kind of situations --- boot off a F11 Live CD, 
check all mixer levels, and see if sound works out-of-the-box. If it does, 
you've been bitten by your own previous configuration settings, and I would 
advise a reformat and clean install of F11. If it doesn't, *then* try to 
troubleshoot and whine on the list, while remembering that it is not 
pulseaudio that is always the culprit. I have seen more bugs boiling down to 
problems with alsa or userspace apps than problems with pa. The presence of pa 
on the system mainly just reveals bugs of other components.


HTH.

Best, :-)
Marko





--
Bill Davidsen david...@tmr.com
  We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked.  - from Slashdot

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: From the top... how do I get sound working in F11 ?

2009-07-25 Thread Bill Davidsen

Craig White wrote:

On Fri, 2009-07-24 at 19:31 -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote:

If it doesn't work out of the box there are no tools to ever make it
work, which 
is why PA should be in the toybox, not the default.


ignoring the reality that PA works for most people out of the box, I
would agree with you but I can't ignore the reality. It works for me. It
has worked for me on every computer I have installed Fedora on. It works
for me on every computer I have installed Ubuntu on.

So tools to correct the cases which don't work out of the box and can't be made 
to work are not needed because it works most of the time? What do we need this 
Linux for anyway, after all Windows works most of the time...


--
Bill Davidsen david...@tmr.com
  We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked.  - from Slashdot

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: From the top... how do I get sound working in F11 ?

2009-07-25 Thread Bill Davidsen

Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:

Bill Davidsen wrote:

Craig White wrote:

Fedora was expecting to use PulseAudio but you removed that as your
predicate. That puts you with a vocal minority who would rather gripe
about pulse audio than make it work so it will be up to them to tell
you how to solve the sound issues that you 'fixed' by removing
pulseaudio package.


Good, then point us to the documentation which describes how to make the
alsamixer, advanced mixer, PA volume and tabs, and anything else which
might clarify how to use the four or five sound apps which all interact
with each other in such a way that sound works without days of fiddling
which stop working at the next upgrade. PA is too damn fragile to use
unless you are one of the few who has it work out of the box.


I would probably start at:
http://pulseaudio.org/wiki/Documentation

There is a nice menu on the right side that serves as a table of
contents, as well as pointing to where to find information on things
like userland programs.

A list of tools is nice, much like giving someone a car which doesn't work and 
packing list for a big set of auto tools, complete with notes on what the 
individual tool does, and letting that someone fix the car. What is lacking is 
some procedure for finding the problems, diagnostics, not the tools to fix them.


All I find is lists of tools, and people who say it works for them so it must 
be your hardware even thought it works with FC6. And people who see no problem 
holding the conflicting concepts that it works right off the bat and you have 
it set up wrong.



--
Bill Davidsen david...@tmr.com
  We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked.  - from Slashdot

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: From the top... how do I get sound working in F11 ?

2009-07-25 Thread Mikkel L. Ellertson
Bill Davidsen wrote:
 Craig White wrote:
 On Fri, 2009-07-24 at 19:31 -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote:
 If it doesn't work out of the box there are no tools to ever make it
 work, which is why PA should be in the toybox, not the default.
 
 ignoring the reality that PA works for most people out of the box, I
 would agree with you but I can't ignore the reality. It works for me. It
 has worked for me on every computer I have installed Fedora on. It works
 for me on every computer I have installed Ubuntu on.

 So tools to correct the cases which don't work out of the box and can't
 be made to work are not needed because it works most of the time? What
 do we need this Linux for anyway, after all Windows works most of the
 time...
 
There are tools, but they are not really dedicated Pulse Audio
tools. You have to go to the Pulse Audio web side that read the
documentation there. (I don't have the link handy, but I posted it
in this thread already.) The one time I had problems, it was an Alsa
configuration problem after an upgrade... (/etc/asound.conf problem.)

There are things like the Pulse Audio volume meters that can tell
you if the signal is getting to pa. The pa volume control can tell
you a lot more about what is going on. For a lot more information,
but harder to understand, there is the device chooser and audio manager.

When you drop down to the Alsa layer, there are tools like aplay and
amixer. There is also alsa-info. System-config-sound mostly works
with this layer. Then there are the assorted volume controls. I use
the standard Gnome volume control, and it offers different sets of
mixer controls, depending on what level/card you are trying to control.

Yes, it can get complicated, especially if you have several sound
cards, and you want to direct different sources to different cards.
But I think the flexibility is worth it.

Mikkel
-- 

  Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons,
for thou art crunchy and taste good with Ketchup!



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Re: From the top... how do I get sound working in F11 ?

2009-07-25 Thread Mikkel L. Ellertson
Bill Davidsen wrote:
 Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
 I would probably start at:
 http://pulseaudio.org/wiki/Documentation

 There is a nice menu on the right side that serves as a table of
 contents, as well as pointing to where to find information on things
 like userland programs.

 A list of tools is nice, much like giving someone a car which doesn't
 work and packing list for a big set of auto tools, complete with notes
 on what the individual tool does, and letting that someone fix the car.
 What is lacking is some procedure for finding the problems, diagnostics,
 not the tools to fix them.
 
 All I find is lists of tools, and people who say it works for them so
 it must be your hardware even thought it works with FC6. And people
 who see no problem holding the conflicting concepts that it works right
 off the bat and you have it set up wrong.
 
Did you actually visit the site? It is much more then a list of
tools. And the links to the tools is a like to directions on how to
use them. You may find this link helpful...

http://pulseaudio.org/wiki/FAQ#Troubleshooting

Mikkel
-- 

  Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons,
for thou art crunchy and taste good with Ketchup!



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Re: From the top... how do I get sound working in F11 ?

2009-07-25 Thread Mikkel L. Ellertson
Bill Davidsen wrote:
 
 Four of six had simple output to the laptop speakers work after install,
 the two  desktops had two channel from the sound card, no setting I've
 found will enable the other speakers from any source, even on hardware
 which had 5.1 with Windows and FC6.
 
You may want to look at:
http://pulseaudio.org/wiki/FAQ#Troubleshooting

I have a surround sound card, but PulseAudio uses just the front
speakers!

Many people have a surround card, but have speakers for just two
channels, so PulseAudio can't really default to a surround setup. To
enable all the channels, edit /etc/pulse/daemon.conf: uncomment the
default-sample-channels line (i.e. remove the semicolon from the
beginning of the line) and set the value to 6 if you have a 5.1
setup, or 8 if you have 7.1 setup etc. After doing the edit, restart
pulseaudio.

Mikkel
-- 

  Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons,
for thou art crunchy and taste good with Ketchup!



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Re: From the top... how do I get sound working in F11 ?

2009-07-25 Thread Gene Heskett
On Saturday 25 July 2009, Bill Davidsen wrote:
Craig White wrote:
 On Fri, 2009-07-24 at 19:31 -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote:
 If it doesn't work out of the box there are no tools to ever make it
 work, which
 is why PA should be in the toybox, not the default.

 
 ignoring the reality that PA works for most people out of the box, I
 would agree with you but I can't ignore the reality. It works for me. It
 has worked for me on every computer I have installed Fedora on. It works
 for me on every computer I have installed Ubuntu on.

So tools to correct the cases which don't work out of the box and can't be
 made to work are not needed because it works most of the time? What do we
 need this Linux for anyway, after all Windows works most of the time...

+1000, spot on as usual Bill.

--
Bill Davidsen david...@tmr.com
   We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked.  - from Slashdot


-- 
Cheers, Gene
There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order.
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
The NRA is offering FREE Associate memberships to anyone who wants them.
https://www.nrahq.org/nrabonus/accept-membership.asp

In the future, you're going to get computers as prizes in breakfast cereals.
You'll throw them out because your house will be littered with them.

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: From the top... how do I get sound working in F11 ?

2009-07-25 Thread Craig White
On Sat, 2009-07-25 at 19:34 -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote:
 Craig White wrote:
  On Fri, 2009-07-24 at 19:31 -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote:
  If it doesn't work out of the box there are no tools to ever make it
  work, which 
  is why PA should be in the toybox, not the default.
  
  ignoring the reality that PA works for most people out of the box, I
  would agree with you but I can't ignore the reality. It works for me. It
  has worked for me on every computer I have installed Fedora on. It works
  for me on every computer I have installed Ubuntu on.
  
 So tools to correct the cases which don't work out of the box and can't be 
 made 
 to work are not needed because it works most of the time? What do we need 
 this 
 Linux for anyway, after all Windows works most of the time...

you make less sense every time you get deeper into this discussion.

If you think Windows is less trouble, you should use Windows. I don't
have a problem with that.

If you think pulse audio is a problem, then don't use it. I have no
problem with that.

pulse audio is little more than a collection layer for audio from
various sources. I am fairly convinced that most of the griping I see on
this list about pulse audio has less to do with pulse audio than people
having trouble getting their Intel motherboard audio to work properly.
Pulseaudio just seems to be a convenient spot to focus one's blame.

I recognize that it is frustrating to have problems, even regressions
with new releases of Fedora but you have to keep in mind that the
kernel, the kernel modules and of course the underlying software is
still in a rapid state of change and the way to make it work for
yourself and everyone else behind you is to perform diligent bug
reports.

If you think that I don't understand these issues, I have had bug
reports about not being able to boot Optiplex 320's via grub since
Fedora 7.

Griping on this list is for losers.

Craig


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


RE: From the top... how do I get sound working in F11 ?

2009-07-25 Thread Markus Kesaromous




 From: craigwh...@azapple.com
 To: fedora-list@redhat.com
 Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2009 18:48:37 -0700
 Subject: Re: From the top... how do I get sound working in F11 ?

 On Sat, 2009-07-25 at 19:34 -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote:
 Craig White wrote:
 On Fri, 2009-07-24 at 19:31 -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote:
 If it doesn't work out of the box there are no tools to ever make it
 work, which
 is why PA should be in the toybox, not the default.
 
 ignoring the reality that PA works for most people out of the box, I
 would agree with you but I can't ignore the reality. It works for me. It
 has worked for me on every computer I have installed Fedora on. It works
 for me on every computer I have installed Ubuntu on.

 So tools to correct the cases which don't work out of the box and can't be 
 made
 to work are not needed because it works most of the time? What do we need 
 this
 Linux for anyway, after all Windows works most of the time...
 
 you make less sense every time you get deeper into this discussion.

 If you think Windows is less trouble, you should use Windows. I don't
 have a problem with that.

 If you think pulse audio is a problem, then don't use it. I have no
 problem with that.

 pulse audio is little more than a collection layer for audio from
 various sources. I am fairly convinced that most of the griping I see on
 this list about pulse audio has less to do with pulse audio than people
 having trouble getting their Intel motherboard audio to work properly.
 Pulseaudio just seems to be a convenient spot to focus one's blame.

Well, not entirely true. I had to stop pulseaudio because it was slowing
down my machine quiet a lot. Top showed it was using between 20 and 38%
of cpu bandwidth. Believe it or not, even after the audio track stopped
playing!! I DO  NOT need a CPU killer audio deamon, thank you.


 I recognize that it is frustrating to have problems, even regressions
 with new releases of Fedora but you have to keep in mind that the
 kernel, the kernel modules and of course the underlying software is
 still in a rapid state of change and the way to make it work for
 yourself and everyone else behind you is to perform diligent bug
 reports.

 If you think that I don't understand these issues, I have had bug
 reports about not being able to boot Optiplex 320's via grub since
 Fedora 7.

 Griping on this list is for losers.

 Craig


 --
 This message has been scanned for viruses and
 dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
 believed to be clean.

 --
 fedora-list mailing list
 fedora-list@redhat.com
 To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
 Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

_
Windows Live™ SkyDrive™: Store, access, and share your photos. See how.
http://windowslive.com/Online/SkyDrive?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_CS_SD_photos_072009

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: From the top... how do I get sound working in F11 ?

2009-07-25 Thread stan
On Sat, 25 Jul 2009 18:56:59 -0700
Markus Kesaromous remotes...@live.com wrote:

 On Sat, 2009-07-25 at 19:34 -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote:  
 Craig White wrote: 
  pulse audio is little more than a collection layer for audio from
  various sources. I am fairly convinced that most of the griping I
  see on this list about pulse audio has less to do with pulse audio
  than people having trouble getting their Intel motherboard audio to
  work properly. Pulseaudio just seems to be a convenient spot to
  focus one's blame.
 
 Well, not entirely true. I had to stop pulseaudio because it was
 slowing down my machine quiet a lot. Top showed it was using between
 20 and 38% of cpu bandwidth. Believe it or not, even after the audio
 track stopped playing!! I DO  NOT need a CPU killer audio deamon,
 thank you.
 

I'm probably not the person to be defending pulse, because I leave it
installed but disabled.  However, a sound server like pulse will
*always* have the potential to use a lot of cpu because it has to
ensure that all sounds it mixes match the frame rate of the device at
the rate for which it has opened it.  This can require on-the-fly rate
conversion, which, while getting faster, is still compute intensive if
done to any quality level.  If the sound server is at 44100 Hz (CD
quality) and you are playing 48000 Hz (movie) sound, this is going to
require conversion. So, if you don't want pulse to use a lot of cpu,
make sure you only play sounds at the frame rate of the sound
server. :-^

I can't explain the fact it did this after the track stopped though.
Did you check after a few seconds of stoppage.  It should have cleaned
up at that point and gone back to sleep.

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: From the top... how do I get sound working in F11 ?

2009-07-24 Thread Bill Davidsen

Linuxguy123 wrote:

On Tue, 2009-07-14 at 17:21 -0500, Jud Craft wrote:

You could try yum reinstalling PulseAudio.

If you had tried a fresh install of F11 on a small side partition, you
could figure out whether F11 sound is the problem or my upgrade
was the problem, since Fedora upgrades seem to have bugs of their own
quite often, and the Linux sound infrastructure did go through changes
between F10 and F11; wouldn't surprise me to hear that a plain upgrade
wouldn't work right.

I'd try reinstalling PulseAudio.  


I've already tried that.  It doesn't work.


Then I'd try a clean install of Fedora.


Don't ever suggest that re installing an operating system is the
solution to a problem.  It isn't.  It would take me several days to
re-install.   Re installing is a stab in the dark at best.

Clue - boot from a Live-CD and see if sound works there, should take less than 
several days.


--
Bill Davidsen david...@tmr.com
  We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked.  - from Slashdot

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: From the top... how do I get sound working in F11 ?

2009-07-24 Thread Bill Davidsen

Craig White wrote:

Linuxguy123 wrote:

On Tue, 2009-07-14 at 12:15 -0700, Kam Leo wrote:
 
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 11:22 AM, Linuxguy123linuxguy...@gmail.com 
wrote:
   

I've been using F11 since it came out and it works great. But I haven't
had any sound since I did the upgrade.  Sound worked great in F10. Its
getting old not having sound.  How do I get it working ?

  

What is Fedora expecting us to use and what do we need to do to get it
working ?

Thanks


Fedora was expecting to use PulseAudio but you removed that as your 
predicate. That puts you with a vocal minority who would rather gripe 
about pulse audio than make it work so it will be up to them to tell you 
how to solve the sound issues that you 'fixed' by removing pulseaudio 
package.


Good, then point us to the documentation which describes how to make the 
alsamixer, advanced mixer, PA volume and tabs, and anything else which might 
clarify how to use the four or five sound apps which all interact with each 
other in such a way that sound works without days of fiddling which stop working 
at the next upgrade. PA is too damn fragile to use unless you are one of the few 
who has it work out of the box.


PA should have been an option for whoever has the bizarre obscure problem PA 
solves. And I have not been able to get any reasonable input from mic or line 
with PA on any of five systems, three of which work with SuSE, or Ubuntu, or 
Slackware (that's what the users changed to).


If it doesn't work out of the box there are no tools to ever make it work, which 
is why PA should be in the toybox, not the default.



--
Bill Davidsen david...@tmr.com
  We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked.  - from Slashdot

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: From the top... how do I get sound working in F11 ?

2009-07-24 Thread Craig White
On Fri, 2009-07-24 at 19:31 -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote:
 If it doesn't work out of the box there are no tools to ever make it
 work, which 
 is why PA should be in the toybox, not the default.

ignoring the reality that PA works for most people out of the box, I
would agree with you but I can't ignore the reality. It works for me. It
has worked for me on every computer I have installed Fedora on. It works
for me on every computer I have installed Ubuntu on.

Craig


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: From the top... how do I get sound working in F11 ?

2009-07-24 Thread Mikkel L. Ellertson
Bill Davidsen wrote:
 Craig White wrote:
 Fedora was expecting to use PulseAudio but you removed that as your
 predicate. That puts you with a vocal minority who would rather gripe
 about pulse audio than make it work so it will be up to them to tell
 you how to solve the sound issues that you 'fixed' by removing
 pulseaudio package.

 Good, then point us to the documentation which describes how to make the
 alsamixer, advanced mixer, PA volume and tabs, and anything else which
 might clarify how to use the four or five sound apps which all interact
 with each other in such a way that sound works without days of fiddling
 which stop working at the next upgrade. PA is too damn fragile to use
 unless you are one of the few who has it work out of the box.
 
I would probably start at:
http://pulseaudio.org/wiki/Documentation

There is a nice menu on the right side that serves as a table of
contents, as well as pointing to where to find information on things
like userland programs.

Mikkel
-- 

  Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons,
for thou art crunchy and taste good with Ketchup!



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Re: From the top... how do I get sound working in F11 ?

2009-07-24 Thread Jeff Spaleta
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 3:52 PM, Craig Whitecraigwh...@azapple.com wrote:
 ignoring the reality that PA works for most people out of the box, I
 would agree with you but I can't ignore the reality. It works for me. It
 has worked for me on every computer I have installed Fedora on. It works
 for me on every computer I have installed Ubuntu on.


I'm in the same boat.  I'd love to help people troubleshoot..but since
I haven't experienced any noticeable problems on my hardware that were
attributable to pulseaudio I don't have enough experience breaking and
unbreaking my own system's pulseaudio configurations to intuit answers
concerning other people's systems.

I will say that in this case..that a fresh install would be extremely
advisable. Following lots of well-meaning troubleshooting from lots of
different people for days and weeks to solve the same problem ends up
leaving your system in a very strange state.

What people like Linuxguy123 seem to forget is that most advice from
peer users on a list like this is predicated on the assumption that
the system in question is close to a unperturbed configuration. Most
people who are willing to help are not themselves experts in the
details of the subsystem operation which is malfunctioning.  The more
configuration changes made, the more you undemine the validity of the
underlying assumptions that people are holding in their minds
concerning the system state and the more frustrating it becomes for
everyone involved in diagnosing the system.  I may not know how to fix
every possible problem with a modern linux system..but I sure know how
to cause difficult to diagnose problems by twiddling configurations
without making detailed notes about what changes I've made.

-jefpulseaudio support for bluetooth headset pairing is greatspaleta

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: From the top... how do I get sound working in F11 ?

2009-07-18 Thread gilpel
 2009/7/15  gil...@altern.org:

 try this killall pulseaudio
 rm -rf /tmp/puls*
 pulseaudio -D (to restart)

No, it didn't change anything.

Thanks for trying!

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: From the top... how do I get sound working in F11 ?

2009-07-17 Thread Mike Martin
2009/7/15  gil...@altern.org:
 Fedora was expecting to use PulseAudio but you removed that as your
 predicate. That puts you with a vocal minority who would rather gripe
 about pulse audio than make it work so it will be up to them to tell you
 how to solve the sound issues that you 'fixed' by removing pulseaudio
 package.

 I didn't remove pulseaudio:

 yum install pulseaudio

 Loaded plugins: refresh-packagekit
 Setting up Install Process
 Package pulseaudio-0.9.15-14.fc11.x86_64 already installed and latest version
 Nothing to do

 Since I find my volume is too low, I tried pavucontrol as suggested. (No
 pamixer available from yum.)

 I receive:

 Connection failed: Connection refused


try this killall pulseaudio
rm -rf /tmp/puls*
pulseaudio -D (to restart)

I remember getting stale pulseaudio file in /tmp back in F9 days and
this cured it


 I can see the settings for output devices are set to 100% in the interface
 but since the connection fails, I can't be sure the figure is correct and
 I can't change it.

 One thing is sure: it isn't possible to get as much juice from my preamp
 as SMplayer delivers. By default, the sound is rather weak, even with
 alsamixer set to max.

 Also, I removed Totem and installed Mplayer because I couldn't watch
 features at Radio-Canada with Totem. I'm not sure how this would work with
 Totem, but I can't set the system so that it plays the DVD just by
 clicking on the icon.

 System - Preferences - File Management - Media finds no application to
 play video DVDs and there is no way to enter preferred applications. For
 audio CDs, XMMS which, I believe is the default for the GNOME
 installation, is still installed and it's no application again, no way
 to enter any.

 For playing DVDs, SMPlayer does a good job so, we're not talking about a
 major glitch here, mainly if you put an icon for SMPlayer in the panel.
 But if people come from the Mac world, they'll really find it terrible if
 you can't start a DVD by clicking on it.

 I would be better if this was fixed. Even though the default volume I now
 have is not unbearably low, it would also be prefereable if there was a
 way to adjust it with pavucontrol. (Maybe this works on 32 bit systems. I
 have no idea.)

 --
 fedora-list mailing list
 fedora-list@redhat.com
 To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
 Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: From the top... how do I get sound working in F11 ?

2009-07-17 Thread Craig White
On Fri, 2009-07-17 at 15:16 +0930, Tim wrote:
 On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 22:36 -0400, gil...@altern.org wrote:
  Somebody has enough confidence in filling bugs to fill this one? I
  find bugzilla is a nightmare.
 
 You really need to fill in bugzilla yourself, because unless you provide
 them with the answer at the same time, or they're able to reproduce the
 problem that YOU have, the next step will probably be them asking you to
 do some more testing for them.
 
 I don't find filling bugzilla in to be too hard.  Finding out if you're
 about to duplicate an already listed bug is painful, or just looking for
 similar bugs (the search function is a bit crap), and selecting the
 right package to report is painful (actually selecting it from the huge
 list, but not, so much, working out which one to select).

bug reporting is one of the most important parts of the open source
process. It is the only way for developers to find out what is necessary
to change for different hardware that people use and by not reporting
bugs, your only chance at getting a fix is if someone else has the same
hardware and reports. So by reporting bugs and working with the
developers, you not only help yourself but you also help others and help
provide a better user experience for everyone.

Proprietary software vendors generally do not rely on user reports and
are typically unresponsive to them.

Craig


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: From the top... how do I get sound working in F11 ?

2009-07-16 Thread gilpel
 On Wed, 2009-07-15 at 10:04 -0400, gil...@altern.org wrote:
 peter wrote:

  What you could do is install pavucontrol.
  Start pavucontrol and select the Configuration tab.
  Try to find the correct output device.

 pavucontrol doesn't work in x86_64. Well, not here. Maybe somebody has a
 different experience?

 Works for me.

Well, I dunno, maybe we don't have the same hardware? I have a
GA-MA770T-UD3P mobo with a Realtek ALC888 audio chipset. Whether I start
pavucontrol from the command line or the application menu, I get:

http://cjoint.com/data/hqucXVQGHM.htm

I tried booting with the CD, then, since pavucontrol isn't installed by
default, I installed it. Same result.

Let's see. Google ALC888 pulseaudio connection failed

Results 1 - 10 of about 251, some dating from nov 2008.

Google with: Realtek ALC888 pulseaudio pavucontrol connection failed
+solved -not solved -haven't solved

2 Iirrelevant/I results.

I could fill a bug report, though I believe I saw one when my search was
less complete, kinda only 'pulseaudio connection failed' But I won't.

As I already explained, first time I noticed a bug, I wasn't a Fedora
user: the minimum hardware recommendation for installing Fedora was
incorrect. Rahul Sundaram was kind enough to fill the bug. Rahul works for
Red Hat, the bug is still there 2 months later. Many people will lose lots
of time with this and it would take a few second to change.

Since open source is about sharing code and SMPlayer does a very good job
with Realtek ALC888, it should be an easy job, I suppose. No?

Somebody has enough confidence in filling bugs to fill this one? I find
bugzilla is a nightmare.

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: From the top... how do I get sound working in F11 ?

2009-07-16 Thread Tim
On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 22:36 -0400, gil...@altern.org wrote:
 Somebody has enough confidence in filling bugs to fill this one? I
 find bugzilla is a nightmare.

You really need to fill in bugzilla yourself, because unless you provide
them with the answer at the same time, or they're able to reproduce the
problem that YOU have, the next step will probably be them asking you to
do some more testing for them.

I don't find filling bugzilla in to be too hard.  Finding out if you're
about to duplicate an already listed bug is painful, or just looking for
similar bugs (the search function is a bit crap), and selecting the
right package to report is painful (actually selecting it from the huge
list, but not, so much, working out which one to select).

-- 
[...@localhost ~]$ uname -r
2.6.27.25-78.2.56.fc9.i686

Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored.  I
read messages from the public lists.



-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: From the top... how do I get sound working in F11 ?

2009-07-15 Thread john wendel

On 07/14/2009 10:02 PM, Linuxguy123 wrote:

On Tue, 2009-07-14 at 20:31 -0700, john wendel wrote:

Looks like our junk is similar - Intel chip

I had lots of sound problems until I moved to a 2.6.30 kernel. You'll
note that all the sound modules have very different sizes from yours.
And your driver version is 1.0.18a while mine is 1.0.20.

I dumped pulse when I was having the sound problems, but it made no
difference.

I'd recommend a kernel upgrade.


Exactly which kernel did you use ?   Did you build it or did you get it
from an unstable repository ?  (a yum command here would be
appreciated...)

I haven't built a custom kernel since Redhat 9...

Thanks




I built 2.6.30.1 from kernel.org. I suspect that there are pre-built 
2.6.30 kernels in rawhide or whatever, but I'd rather roll my own. Once 
you get a working config file, it only takes a few minutes. I started 
with the fedora config file (in /boot) and removed all the things I 
don't use, saves a few megabytes.


-rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 3033520 2009-06-16 20:32 
vmlinuz-2.6.29.5-191.fc11.i586

-rw-r--r--. 1 root root 1348832 2009-07-03 18:58 vmlinuz-2.6.30.1

Regards,

John




--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: From the top... how do I get sound working in F11 ?

2009-07-15 Thread Peter van Hooft
What you could do is install pavucontrol.
Start pavucontrol and select the Configuration tab.
Try to find the correct output device.

peter
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Re: From the top... how do I get sound working in F11 ?

2009-07-15 Thread gilpel
peter wrote:

 What you could do is install pavucontrol.
 Start pavucontrol and select the Configuration tab.
 Try to find the correct output device.

pavucontrol doesn't work in x86_64. Well, not here. Maybe somebody has a
different experience?

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: From the top... how do I get sound working in F11 ?

2009-07-15 Thread Linuxguy123
On Wed, 2009-07-15 at 01:05 -0700, Craig White wrote:
 Linuxguy123 wrote:
  On Tue, 2009-07-14 at 12:15 -0700, Kam Leo wrote:

  On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 11:22 AM, Linuxguy123linuxguy...@gmail.com wrote:
  
  I've been using F11 since it came out and it works great. But I haven't
  had any sound since I did the upgrade.  Sound worked great in F10. Its
  getting old not having sound.  How do I get it working ?
 

  What is Fedora expecting us to use and what do we need to do to get it
  working ?
 
  Thanks
 
 Fedora was expecting to use PulseAudio but you removed that as your 
 predicate. That puts you with a vocal minority who would rather gripe 
 about pulse audio than make it work so it will be up to them to tell you 
 how to solve the sound issues that you 'fixed' by removing pulseaudio 
 package.

Is this an accidental repost ?

As I stated in a reply to this yesterday, this is not the case at all.



-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: From the top... how do I get sound working in F11 ?

2009-07-15 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Wed, 2009-07-15 at 10:04 -0400, gil...@altern.org wrote:
 peter wrote:
 
  What you could do is install pavucontrol.
  Start pavucontrol and select the Configuration tab.
  Try to find the correct output device.
 
 pavucontrol doesn't work in x86_64. Well, not here. Maybe somebody has a
 different experience?

Works for me.

poc

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: From the top... how do I get sound working in F11 ?

2009-07-15 Thread William Case
Hi Linuxguy123;

On Tue, 2009-07-14 at 12:22 -0600, Linuxguy123 wrote:
 I've been using F11 since it came out and it works great. But I haven't
 had any sound since I did the upgrade.  Sound worked great in F10. Its
 getting old not having sound.  How do I get it working ?
 
 $ uname -a
 Linux localhost.localdomain 2.6.29.5-191.fc11.i586 #1 SMP Tue Jun 16
 23:11:39 EDT 2009 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
 
 $lsmod | grep snd
 snd_hda_codec_idt  50560  1
 snd_hda_intel  23920  3
 snd_hda_codec  54264  2 snd_hda_codec_idt,snd_hda_intel
 snd_hwdep   6580  1 snd_hda_codec
 snd_pcm62556  2 snd_hda_intel,snd_hda_codec
 snd_timer  17896  1 snd_pcm
 snd49044  12
 snd_hda_codec_idt,snd_hda_intel,snd_hda_codec,snd_hwdep,snd_pcm,snd_timer
 soundcore   5404  1 snd
 snd_page_alloc  7572  2 snd_hda_intel,snd_pcm
 
 $ aplay -l
  List of PLAYBACK Hardware Devices 
 card 0: Intel [HDA Intel], device 0: STAC92xx Analog [STAC92xx Analog]
   Subdevices: 1/1 
   Subdevice #0: subdevice #0  
 card 0: Intel [HDA Intel], device 1: STAC92xx Digital [STAC92xx Digital]
   Subdevices: 1/1   
   Subdevice #0: subdevice #0   
 
 $ yum list pulseaudio\*
 Loaded plugins: dellsysidplugin2, downloadonly, kmdl, priorities,
 refresh-packagekit
 1 packages excluded due to repository priority protections
 Installed Packages
 pulseaudio-libs.i586 0.9.15-14.fc11 @updates
 pulseaudio-libs-glib2.i586 0.9.15-14.fc11 @updates
 
 $ cat /proc/asound/version
 Advanced Linux Sound Architecture Driver Version 1.0.18a.
 
 
 yum list alsa\*
 Loaded plugins: dellsysidplugin2, downloadonly, kmdl, priorities,
 refresh-packagekit
 1 packages excluded due to repository priority protections
 Installed Packages
 alsa-lib.i586 1.0.20-1.fc11 installed
 alsa-lib-devel.i586  1.0.20-1.fc11 installed
 alsa-oss.i586 1.0.17-3.fc11 installed
 alsa-oss-devel.i586 1.0.17-3.fc11 installed
 alsa-oss-libs.i586 1.0.17-3.fc11 installed
 alsa-utils.i586 1.0.20-3.fc11 installed
 
 I've run alsamixer -c0 and all the levels are set to their maximums.
 
 I've removed pulseaudio and mplayer and removed the .mplayer folder and
 then reinstalled mplayer. 
 
 How should I proceed from here ?

I have very much the same problem.

I have filed a bug regarding it.
The bug is https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511178

Check /var/log/messages and see if you can find a warning or error
similar to:


...
pulseaudio[2182]: alsa-sink.c: Increasing minimal latency to 1.00ms
pulseaudio[2182]: alsa-sink.c: Increasing minimal
latency to 2.00 ms
pulseaudio[2182]: alsa-sink.c: Increasing minimal
latency to 4.00 ms
pulseaudio[2182]: alsa-sink.c: ALSA woke us up to
write new data to the device, but there was actually nothing to write!
pulseaudio[2182]: alsa-sink.c: Most likely this is
a bug in the ALSA driver 'snd_hda_intel'. Please report this issue to
the ALSA developers.
pulseaudio[2182]: alsa-sink.c: We were woken up with POLLOUT set --
however a subsequent snd_pcm_avail() returned 0 or another value 
min_avail.
...

If so, it matches my bug.  A bug search on Alsa, pulseaudio and alsa-lib
shows many recent similar problems.

I filed bug 511178 two days ago but have received no response yet.  If
it is appropriate (i.e. the same issue) I would appreciate your adding a
comment to the bug.
-- 
Regards Bill
Fedora 11, Gnome 2.26.2
Evo.2.26.2, Emacs 22.3.1

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: From the top... how do I get sound working in F11 ?

2009-07-15 Thread Linuxguy123
On Wed, 2009-07-15 at 10:55 -0400, William Case wrote:
 Hi Linuxguy123;
 
 On Tue, 2009-07-14 at 12:22 -0600, Linuxguy123 wrote:
  I've been using F11 since it came out and it works great. But I haven't
  had any sound since I did the upgrade.  Sound worked great in F10. Its
  getting old not having sound.  How do I get it working ?
  

snip

  
  How should I proceed from here ?
 
 I have very much the same problem.
 
 I have filed a bug regarding it.
 The bug is https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511178
 
 Check /var/log/messages and see if you can find a warning or error
 similar to:
 
 
 ...
 pulseaudio[2182]: alsa-sink.c: Increasing minimal latency to 1.00ms
 pulseaudio[2182]: alsa-sink.c: Increasing minimal
 latency to 2.00 ms
 pulseaudio[2182]: alsa-sink.c: Increasing minimal
 latency to 4.00 ms
 pulseaudio[2182]: alsa-sink.c: ALSA woke us up to
 write new data to the device, but there was actually nothing to write!
 pulseaudio[2182]: alsa-sink.c: Most likely this is
 a bug in the ALSA driver 'snd_hda_intel'. Please report this issue to
 the ALSA developers.
 pulseaudio[2182]: alsa-sink.c: We were woken up with POLLOUT set --
 however a subsequent snd_pcm_avail() returned 0 or another value 
 min_avail.
 ...
 
 If so, it matches my bug.  A bug search on Alsa, pulseaudio and alsa-lib
 shows many recent similar problems.
 
 I filed bug 511178 two days ago but have received no response yet.  If
 it is appropriate (i.e. the same issue) I would appreciate your adding a
 comment to the bug.

I think my situation is a bit different.

From /var/log/messages:


Jul 15 06:38:11 localhost pulseaudio[2989]: alsa-sink.c: ALSA woke us up
to write new data to the device, but there was actually nothing to
write!

Jul 15 06:38:11 localhost pulseaudio[2989]: alsa-sink.c: Most likely
this is a bug in the ALSA driver 'snd_hda_intel'. Please report this
issue to the ALSA developers.

Jul 15 06:38:11 localhost pulseaudio[2989]: alsa-sink.c: We were woken
up with POLLOUT set -- however a subsequent snd_pcm_avail() returned 0
or another value  min_avail.

Jul 15 06:38:14 localhost pulseaudio[2989]: reserve-wrap.c: Failed to
acquire reservation lock on device 'Audio0': Input/output error

Jul 15 06:38:20 localhost pulseaudio[2989]: reserve-wrap.c: Failed to
acquire reservation lock on device 'Audio0': Input/output error

Jul 15 06:38:20 localhost pulseaudio[2989]: alsa-source.c: ALSA woke us
up to read new data from the device, but there was actually nothing to
read!

Jul 15 06:38:20 localhost pulseaudio[2989]: alsa-source.c: Most likely
this is a bug in the ALSA driver 'snd_hda_intel'. Please report this
issue to the ALSA developers.

Jul 15 06:38:20 localhost pulseaudio[2989]: alsa-source.c: We were woken
up with POLLIN set -- however a subsequent snd_pcm_avail() returned 0 or
another value  min_avail.

Jul 15 06:38:33 localhost pulseaudio[2989]: reserve-wrap.c: Failed to
acquire reservation lock on device 'Audio0': Input/output error

===

I am wondering if your problem wouldn't be solved by manually setting
the latency times as they do in the following post:

http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?t=225660

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


From the top... how do I get sound working in F11 ?

2009-07-14 Thread Linuxguy123
I've been using F11 since it came out and it works great. But I haven't
had any sound since I did the upgrade.  Sound worked great in F10. Its
getting old not having sound.  How do I get it working ?

$ uname -a
Linux localhost.localdomain 2.6.29.5-191.fc11.i586 #1 SMP Tue Jun 16
23:11:39 EDT 2009 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux

$lsmod | grep snd
snd_hda_codec_idt  50560  1
snd_hda_intel  23920  3
snd_hda_codec  54264  2 snd_hda_codec_idt,snd_hda_intel
snd_hwdep   6580  1 snd_hda_codec
snd_pcm62556  2 snd_hda_intel,snd_hda_codec
snd_timer  17896  1 snd_pcm
snd49044  12
snd_hda_codec_idt,snd_hda_intel,snd_hda_codec,snd_hwdep,snd_pcm,snd_timer
soundcore   5404  1 snd
snd_page_alloc  7572  2 snd_hda_intel,snd_pcm

$ aplay -l
 List of PLAYBACK Hardware Devices 
card 0: Intel [HDA Intel], device 0: STAC92xx Analog [STAC92xx Analog]
  Subdevices: 1/1 
  Subdevice #0: subdevice #0  
card 0: Intel [HDA Intel], device 1: STAC92xx Digital [STAC92xx Digital]
  Subdevices: 1/1   
  Subdevice #0: subdevice #0   

$ yum list pulseaudio\*
Loaded plugins: dellsysidplugin2, downloadonly, kmdl, priorities,
refresh-packagekit
1 packages excluded due to repository priority protections
Installed Packages
pulseaudio-libs.i586 0.9.15-14.fc11 @updates
pulseaudio-libs-glib2.i586 0.9.15-14.fc11 @updates

$ cat /proc/asound/version
Advanced Linux Sound Architecture Driver Version 1.0.18a.


yum list alsa\*
Loaded plugins: dellsysidplugin2, downloadonly, kmdl, priorities,
refresh-packagekit
1 packages excluded due to repository priority protections
Installed Packages
alsa-lib.i586 1.0.20-1.fc11 installed
alsa-lib-devel.i586  1.0.20-1.fc11 installed
alsa-oss.i586 1.0.17-3.fc11 installed
alsa-oss-devel.i586 1.0.17-3.fc11 installed
alsa-oss-libs.i586 1.0.17-3.fc11 installed
alsa-utils.i586 1.0.20-3.fc11 installed

I've run alsamixer -c0 and all the levels are set to their maximums.

I've removed pulseaudio and mplayer and removed the .mplayer folder and
then reinstalled mplayer. 

How should I proceed from here ?

Thanks



-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: From the top... how do I get sound working in F11 ?

2009-07-14 Thread Kam Leo
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 11:22 AM, Linuxguy123linuxguy...@gmail.com wrote:
 I've been using F11 since it came out and it works great. But I haven't
 had any sound since I did the upgrade.  Sound worked great in F10. Its
 getting old not having sound.  How do I get it working ?


[snip]

 I've removed pulseaudio and mplayer and removed the .mplayer folder and
 then reinstalled mplayer.

 How should I proceed from here ?

 Thanks

Sound also failed for me when I upgraded my virtual machine from F10.
It also failed on a new virtual machine install of F11.  Status for
sound is as follows:

VM upgrade of F10 to F11:

Removed PA.
Unable to remove Alsa because of dependency hell.  (Most
everything is tied to it.)
Download and installed Open Sound System driver rpm:
http://www.4front-tech.com/download.cgi

Got sound and a mixer but no master volume control for Gnome taskbar.

VM F11 install:

  No sound device. PA Manager/Device Chooser and find device or
defaults to null.
  Removed PA
  Enabled OSS sound support in /etc/modprobe.d/dist-oss.conf

  After restart: Sound card detected. Alsa mixer works.  No master
volume control for Gnome.


I also have virtual machine instances of openSUSE 11.1 and Ubuntu 9.04
installed on the same machine. Sound works in both.  As far as I am
aware both distros use Pulse Audio. So, where or how did Fedora
developers get off track and derail sound?

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: From the top... how do I get sound working in F11 ?

2009-07-14 Thread Kam Leo
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 12:15 PM, Kam Leokam@gmail.com wrote:
 On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 11:22 AM, Linuxguy123linuxguy...@gmail.com wrote:
 I've been using F11 since it came out and it works great. But I haven't
 had any sound since I did the upgrade.  Sound worked great in F10. Its
 getting old not having sound.  How do I get it working ?


 [snip]

 I've removed pulseaudio and mplayer and removed the .mplayer folder and
 then reinstalled mplayer.

 How should I proceed from here ?

 Thanks

 Sound also failed for me when I upgraded my virtual machine from F10.
 It also failed on a new virtual machine install of F11.  Status for
 sound is as follows:

 VM upgrade of F10 to F11:

    Removed PA.
    Unable to remove Alsa because of dependency hell.  (Most
 everything is tied to it.)
    Download and installed Open Sound System driver rpm:
 http://www.4front-tech.com/download.cgi

    Got sound and a mixer but no master volume control for Gnome taskbar.

 VM F11 install:

      No sound device. PA Manager/Device Chooser and find device or

   ^
*** Gmail editor bug.***Should be can not

 defaults to null.
      Removed PA
      Enabled OSS sound support in /etc/modprobe.d/dist-oss.conf

      After restart: Sound card detected. Alsa mixer works.  No master
 volume control for Gnome.


 I also have virtual machine instances of openSUSE 11.1 and Ubuntu 9.04
 installed on the same machine. Sound works in both.  As far as I am
 aware both distros use Pulse Audio. So, where or how did Fedora
 developers get off track and derail sound?


-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: From the top... how do I get sound working in F11 ?

2009-07-14 Thread Linuxguy123
On Tue, 2009-07-14 at 12:15 -0700, Kam Leo wrote:
 On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 11:22 AM, Linuxguy123linuxguy...@gmail.com wrote:
  I've been using F11 since it came out and it works great. But I haven't
  had any sound since I did the upgrade.  Sound worked great in F10. Its
  getting old not having sound.  How do I get it working ?
 
 
 [snip]
 
  I've removed pulseaudio and mplayer and removed the .mplayer folder and
  then reinstalled mplayer.
 
  How should I proceed from here ?
 
  Thanks
 
 Sound also failed for me when I upgraded my virtual machine from F10.
 It also failed on a new virtual machine install of F11.  Status for
 sound is as follows:
 
 VM upgrade of F10 to F11:
 
 Removed PA.
 Unable to remove Alsa because of dependency hell.  (Most
 everything is tied to it.)
 Download and installed Open Sound System driver rpm:
 http://www.4front-tech.com/download.cgi
 
 Got sound and a mixer but no master volume control for Gnome taskbar.
 
 VM F11 install:
 
   No sound device. PA Manager/Device Chooser and find device or
 defaults to null.
   Removed PA
   Enabled OSS sound support in /etc/modprobe.d/dist-oss.conf
 
   After restart: Sound card detected. Alsa mixer works.  No master
 volume control for Gnome.
 
 
 I also have virtual machine instances of openSUSE 11.1 and Ubuntu 9.04
 installed on the same machine. Sound works in both.  As far as I am
 aware both distros use Pulse Audio. So, where or how did Fedora
 developers get off track and derail sound?

Thanks for detailing your process, but I can't help but notice its for a
VM instead of an actual installation like I am running.  Does anyone
have tips for a non VM installation ?

Why did you have to download the oss driver from a non Fedora location ?
What is Fedora expecting us to use and what do we need to do to get it
working ?

Thanks


 

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: From the top... how do I get sound working in F11 ?

2009-07-14 Thread Shannon McMackin

On 07/14/2009 04:18 PM, Linuxguy123 wrote:

On Tue, 2009-07-14 at 12:15 -0700, Kam Leo wrote:

On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 11:22 AM, Linuxguy123linuxguy...@gmail.com  wrote:

I've been using F11 since it came out and it works great. But I haven't
had any sound since I did the upgrade.  Sound worked great in F10. Its
getting old not having sound.  How do I get it working ?


[snip]


I've removed pulseaudio and mplayer and removed the .mplayer folder and
then reinstalled mplayer.

How should I proceed from here ?

Thanks

Sound also failed for me when I upgraded my virtual machine from F10.
It also failed on a new virtual machine install of F11.  Status for
sound is as follows:

VM upgrade of F10 to F11:

 Removed PA.
 Unable to remove Alsa because of dependency hell.  (Most
everything is tied to it.)
 Download and installed Open Sound System driver rpm:
http://www.4front-tech.com/download.cgi

 Got sound and a mixer but no master volume control for Gnome taskbar.

VM F11 install:

   No sound device. PA Manager/Device Chooser and find device or
defaults to null.
   Removed PA
   Enabled OSS sound support in /etc/modprobe.d/dist-oss.conf

   After restart: Sound card detected. Alsa mixer works.  No master
volume control for Gnome.


I also have virtual machine instances of openSUSE 11.1 and Ubuntu 9.04
installed on the same machine. Sound works in both.  As far as I am
aware both distros use Pulse Audio. So, where or how did Fedora
developers get off track and derail sound?


Thanks for detailing your process, but I can't help but notice its for a
VM instead of an actual installation like I am running.  Does anyone
have tips for a non VM installation ?

Why did you have to download the oss driver from a non Fedora location ?
What is Fedora expecting us to use and what do we need to do to get it
working ?

Thanks



I had no sound until I found the tip to run alsamixer -c0 and make sure 
the appropriate levels were maxed, then PA was fine.


--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: From the top... how do I get sound working in F11 ?

2009-07-14 Thread Linuxguy123
On Tue, 2009-07-14 at 16:27 -0400, Shannon McMackin wrote:
 I had no sound until I found the tip to run alsamixer -c0 and make
 sure 
 the appropriate levels were maxed, then PA was fine.

As I stated in my first email, I have already done this.

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: From the top... how do I get sound working in F11 ?

2009-07-14 Thread Chris
2009/7/14 Linuxguy123 linuxguy...@gmail.com:
 I've been using F11 since it came out and it works great. But I haven't
 had any sound since I did the upgrade.  Sound worked great in F10. Its
 getting old not having sound.  How do I get it working ?

I've had a whole bunch of sound problems so I'll throw some
suggestions in... I've found that in a few situations I can only get
sound working with the flash plugin and VLC. There's obviously
something wrong with one or more of the backends to the various apps
(gstreamer, xine, phonon). It's worth figuring out whether you're
getting no sound at all (which would suggest there's something wrong
with the config of your output device), or whether you're getting
output from certain apps but not others (which would suggest some or
all of the backends are failing for some reason).

I seem to recall reading some of your threads about KDE 4.0 so I guess
you're running KDE now. In that case, you're probably running audio
apps which go through phonon, which is part of Qt4. I've had problems
with the xine backend of phonon at times. When I removed the xine
backend things sprung into life (maybe try rpm -qa | grep phonon for
clues as to the package to remove).

HTH, Chris.

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: From the top... how do I get sound working in F11 ?

2009-07-14 Thread Jud Craft
You could try yum reinstalling PulseAudio.

If you had tried a fresh install of F11 on a small side partition, you
could figure out whether F11 sound is the problem or my upgrade
was the problem, since Fedora upgrades seem to have bugs of their own
quite often, and the Linux sound infrastructure did go through changes
between F10 and F11; wouldn't surprise me to hear that a plain upgrade
wouldn't work right.

I'd try reinstalling PulseAudio.  Then I'd try a clean install of Fedora.

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: From the top... how do I get sound working in F11 ?

2009-07-14 Thread Linuxguy123
On Tue, 2009-07-14 at 17:21 -0500, Jud Craft wrote:
 You could try yum reinstalling PulseAudio.
 
 If you had tried a fresh install of F11 on a small side partition, you
 could figure out whether F11 sound is the problem or my upgrade
 was the problem, since Fedora upgrades seem to have bugs of their own
 quite often, and the Linux sound infrastructure did go through changes
 between F10 and F11; wouldn't surprise me to hear that a plain upgrade
 wouldn't work right.
 
 I'd try reinstalling PulseAudio.  

I've already tried that.  It doesn't work.

 Then I'd try a clean install of Fedora.

Don't ever suggest that re installing an operating system is the
solution to a problem.  It isn't.  It would take me several days to
re-install.   Re installing is a stab in the dark at best.

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: From the top... how do I get sound working in F11 ?

2009-07-14 Thread Jud Craft
Considering your install wasn't a fresh one to begin with, and Fedora
makes releases twice a year that don't always cleanly upgrade between
each other, I think reinstalling isn't an unreasonable suggestion.
But it was just my suggestion.

You could always set aside a small partition and do a fresh install.
That would at least confirm if F11 sound works at all on your machine.
 It's not a stab in the dark; it actually -rules- out possibilities
that you need to consider, would tell you if getting F11 sound working
at all is possible, and instead help you focus on how to repair your
upgraded environment, or tell you immediately if it was futile.


On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 6:05 PM, Linuxguy123linuxguy...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Tue, 2009-07-14 at 17:21 -0500, Jud Craft wrote:
 You could try yum reinstalling PulseAudio.

 If you had tried a fresh install of F11 on a small side partition, you
 could figure out whether F11 sound is the problem or my upgrade
 was the problem, since Fedora upgrades seem to have bugs of their own
 quite often, and the Linux sound infrastructure did go through changes
 between F10 and F11; wouldn't surprise me to hear that a plain upgrade
 wouldn't work right.

 I'd try reinstalling PulseAudio.

 I've already tried that.  It doesn't work.

 Then I'd try a clean install of Fedora.

 Don't ever suggest that re installing an operating system is the
 solution to a problem.  It isn't.  It would take me several days to
 re-install.   Re installing is a stab in the dark at best.

 --
 fedora-list mailing list
 fedora-list@redhat.com
 To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
 Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: From the top... how do I get sound working in F11 ?

2009-07-14 Thread Craig White

Linuxguy123 wrote:

On Tue, 2009-07-14 at 12:15 -0700, Kam Leo wrote:
  

On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 11:22 AM, Linuxguy123linuxguy...@gmail.com wrote:


I've been using F11 since it came out and it works great. But I haven't
had any sound since I did the upgrade.  Sound worked great in F10. Its
getting old not having sound.  How do I get it working ?

  

What is Fedora expecting us to use and what do we need to do to get it
working ?

Thanks


Fedora was expecting to use PulseAudio but you removed that as your 
predicate. That puts you with a vocal minority who would rather gripe 
about pulse audio than make it work so it will be up to them to tell you 
how to solve the sound issues that you 'fixed' by removing pulseaudio 
package.


good luck

Craig

--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: From the top... how do I get sound working in F11 ?

2009-07-14 Thread Linuxguy123
On Wed, 2009-07-15 at 01:05 -0700, Craig White wrote:
 Linuxguy123 wrote:
  On Tue, 2009-07-14 at 12:15 -0700, Kam Leo wrote:

  On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 11:22 AM, Linuxguy123linuxguy...@gmail.com wrote:
  
  I've been using F11 since it came out and it works great. But I haven't
  had any sound since I did the upgrade.  Sound worked great in F10. Its
  getting old not having sound.  How do I get it working ?
 

  What is Fedora expecting us to use and what do we need to do to get it
  working ?
 
  Thanks
 
 Fedora was expecting to use PulseAudio but you removed that as your 
 predicate. That puts you with a vocal minority who would rather gripe 
 about pulse audio than make it work so it will be up to them to tell you 
 how to solve the sound issues that you 'fixed' by removing pulseaudio 
 package.

I have absolutely NO beef with pulseaudio whatsoever.  I did not gripe
about its existence.  As long as it works, fine by me.  I only removed
it because people on this list suggested that its removal would cure my
problem.

I have just reinstalled pulseaudio.  My sound still doesn't work.   How
should I proceed ?

# yum list pulseaudio\*
Loaded plugins: dellsysidplugin2, downloadonly, kmdl, priorities,
refresh-packagekit
1 packages excluded due to repository priority protections
Installed Packages
pulseaudio.i586 0.9.15-14.fc11 @updates
pulseaudio-libs.i586 0.9.15-14.fc11 @updates
pulseaudio-libs-glib2.i586 0.9.15-14.fc11 @updates






-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: From the top... how do I get sound working in F11 ?

2009-07-14 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 18:45:06 -0500,
  Jud Craft craft...@gmail.com wrote:
 Considering your install wasn't a fresh one to begin with, and Fedora
 makes releases twice a year that don't always cleanly upgrade between
 each other, I think reinstalling isn't an unreasonable suggestion.
 But it was just my suggestion.

There are tools (e.g. package-cleanup and rpm -Va) that can be used to
check out that an install was made properly without do a reinstall.
The *.rpm??? confige files can be checked to see if anything needs to
be done related to them.

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: From the top... how do I get sound working in F11 ?

2009-07-14 Thread Linuxguy123
On Tue, 2009-07-14 at 20:35 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
 On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 18:45:06 -0500,
   Jud Craft craft...@gmail.com wrote:
  Considering your install wasn't a fresh one to begin with, and Fedora
  makes releases twice a year that don't always cleanly upgrade between
  each other, I think reinstalling isn't an unreasonable suggestion.
  But it was just my suggestion.
 
 There are tools (e.g. package-cleanup and rpm -Va) that can be used to
 check out that an install was made properly without do a reinstall.
 The *.rpm??? confige files can be checked to see if anything needs to
 be done related to them.

Thanks for reminding us of that.  I'll keep it in mind as we move
forward troubleshooting this issue.


-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: From the top... how do I get sound working in F11 ?

2009-07-14 Thread Kam Leo
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 6:35 PM, Bruno Wolff IIIbr...@wolff.to wrote:
 On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 18:45:06 -0500,
  Jud Craft craft...@gmail.com wrote:
 Considering your install wasn't a fresh one to begin with, and Fedora
 makes releases twice a year that don't always cleanly upgrade between
 each other, I think reinstalling isn't an unreasonable suggestion.
 But it was just my suggestion.

 There are tools (e.g. package-cleanup and rpm -Va) that can be used to
 check out that an install was made properly without do a reinstall.
 The *.rpm??? confige files can be checked to see if anything needs to
 be done related to them.


Been there. Done that. Does not work. All packages got installed properly.

Biggest problem with F11 sound is that Fedora developers dropped
system-config-soundcard and did not provide other means to fix
hardware issues. If PA does not see a soundcard you are hosed.

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: From the top... how do I get sound working in F11 ?

2009-07-14 Thread Linuxguy123
On Tue, 2009-07-14 at 18:40 -0700, Kam Leo wrote:
 On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 6:35 PM, Bruno Wolff IIIbr...@wolff.to wrote:
  On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 18:45:06 -0500,
   Jud Craft craft...@gmail.com wrote:
  Considering your install wasn't a fresh one to begin with, and Fedora
  makes releases twice a year that don't always cleanly upgrade between
  each other, I think reinstalling isn't an unreasonable suggestion.
  But it was just my suggestion.
 
  There are tools (e.g. package-cleanup and rpm -Va) that can be used to
  check out that an install was made properly without do a reinstall.
  The *.rpm??? confige files can be checked to see if anything needs to
  be done related to them.
 
 
 Been there. Done that. Does not work. All packages got installed properly.
 
 Biggest problem with F11 sound is that Fedora developers dropped
 system-config-soundcard and did not provide other means to fix
 hardware issues. If PA does not see a soundcard you are hosed.

So how does one check if PA is seeing the soundcard ?

Thanks



-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: From the top... how do I get sound working in F11 ?

2009-07-14 Thread fred smith
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 12:22:15PM -0600, Linuxguy123 wrote:
 I've been using F11 since it came out and it works great. But I haven't
 had any sound since I did the upgrade.  Sound worked great in F10. Its
 getting old not having sound.  How do I get it working ?
 
 $ uname -a
 Linux localhost.localdomain 2.6.29.5-191.fc11.i586 #1 SMP Tue Jun 16
 23:11:39 EDT 2009 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
 
 $lsmod | grep snd
 snd_hda_codec_idt  50560  1
 snd_hda_intel  23920  3
 snd_hda_codec  54264  2 snd_hda_codec_idt,snd_hda_intel
 snd_hwdep   6580  1 snd_hda_codec
 snd_pcm62556  2 snd_hda_intel,snd_hda_codec
 snd_timer  17896  1 snd_pcm
 snd49044  12
 snd_hda_codec_idt,snd_hda_intel,snd_hda_codec,snd_hwdep,snd_pcm,snd_timer
 soundcore   5404  1 snd
 snd_page_alloc  7572  2 snd_hda_intel,snd_pcm
 
 $ aplay -l
  List of PLAYBACK Hardware Devices 
 card 0: Intel [HDA Intel], device 0: STAC92xx Analog [STAC92xx Analog]
   Subdevices: 1/1 
   Subdevice #0: subdevice #0  
 card 0: Intel [HDA Intel], device 1: STAC92xx Digital [STAC92xx Digital]
   Subdevices: 1/1   
   Subdevice #0: subdevice #0   
 
 $ yum list pulseaudio\*
 Loaded plugins: dellsysidplugin2, downloadonly, kmdl, priorities,
 refresh-packagekit
 1 packages excluded due to repository priority protections
 Installed Packages
 pulseaudio-libs.i586 0.9.15-14.fc11 @updates
 pulseaudio-libs-glib2.i586 0.9.15-14.fc11 @updates
 
 $ cat /proc/asound/version
 Advanced Linux Sound Architecture Driver Version 1.0.18a.
 
 
 yum list alsa\*
 Loaded plugins: dellsysidplugin2, downloadonly, kmdl, priorities,
 refresh-packagekit
 1 packages excluded due to repository priority protections
 Installed Packages
 alsa-lib.i586 1.0.20-1.fc11 installed
 alsa-lib-devel.i586  1.0.20-1.fc11 installed
 alsa-oss.i586 1.0.17-3.fc11 installed
 alsa-oss-devel.i586 1.0.17-3.fc11 installed
 alsa-oss-libs.i586 1.0.17-3.fc11 installed
 alsa-utils.i586 1.0.20-3.fc11 installed
 
 I've run alsamixer -c0 and all the levels are set to their maximums.
 
 I've removed pulseaudio and mplayer and removed the .mplayer folder and
 then reinstalled mplayer. 
 
 How should I proceed from here ?
 
 Thanks

there's a thorough-looking guide on the fedora forums at:
http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?t=225660

Please note that I have not tried it, so I will assume no responsibility
if it makes your computer fly around the room. :)


-- 
 Fred Smith -- fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us -
The Lord detests the way of the wicked 
  but he loves those who pursue righteousness.
- Proverbs 15:9 (niv) -


pgpGtFrTNulln.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Re: From the top... how do I get sound working in F11 ?

2009-07-14 Thread Shannon McMackin

On 07/14/2009 10:13 PM, fred smith wrote:

On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 12:22:15PM -0600, Linuxguy123 wrote:

I've been using F11 since it came out and it works great. But I haven't
had any sound since I did the upgrade.  Sound worked great in F10. Its
getting old not having sound.  How do I get it working ?

$ uname -a
Linux localhost.localdomain 2.6.29.5-191.fc11.i586 #1 SMP Tue Jun 16
23:11:39 EDT 2009 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux

$lsmod | grep snd
snd_hda_codec_idt  50560  1
snd_hda_intel  23920  3
snd_hda_codec  54264  2 snd_hda_codec_idt,snd_hda_intel
snd_hwdep   6580  1 snd_hda_codec
snd_pcm62556  2 snd_hda_intel,snd_hda_codec
snd_timer  17896  1 snd_pcm
snd49044  12
snd_hda_codec_idt,snd_hda_intel,snd_hda_codec,snd_hwdep,snd_pcm,snd_timer
soundcore   5404  1 snd
snd_page_alloc  7572  2 snd_hda_intel,snd_pcm

$ aplay -l
 List of PLAYBACK Hardware Devices 
card 0: Intel [HDA Intel], device 0: STAC92xx Analog [STAC92xx Analog]
   Subdevices: 1/1
   Subdevice #0: subdevice #0
card 0: Intel [HDA Intel], device 1: STAC92xx Digital [STAC92xx Digital]
   Subdevices: 1/1
   Subdevice #0: subdevice #0

$ yum list pulseaudio\*
Loaded plugins: dellsysidplugin2, downloadonly, kmdl, priorities,
refresh-packagekit
1 packages excluded due to repository priority protections
Installed Packages
pulseaudio-libs.i586 0.9.15-14.fc11 @updates
pulseaudio-libs-glib2.i586 0.9.15-14.fc11 @updates

$ cat /proc/asound/version
Advanced Linux Sound Architecture Driver Version 1.0.18a.


yum list alsa\*
Loaded plugins: dellsysidplugin2, downloadonly, kmdl, priorities,
refresh-packagekit
1 packages excluded due to repository priority protections
Installed Packages
alsa-lib.i586 1.0.20-1.fc11 installed
alsa-lib-devel.i586  1.0.20-1.fc11 installed
alsa-oss.i586 1.0.17-3.fc11 installed
alsa-oss-devel.i586 1.0.17-3.fc11 installed
alsa-oss-libs.i586 1.0.17-3.fc11 installed
alsa-utils.i586 1.0.20-3.fc11 installed

I've run alsamixer -c0 and all the levels are set to their maximums.

I've removed pulseaudio and mplayer and removed the .mplayer folder and
then reinstalled mplayer.

How should I proceed from here ?

Thanks


there's a thorough-looking guide on the fedora forums at:
http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?t=225660

Please note that I have not tried it, so I will assume no responsibility
if it makes your computer fly around the room. :)



I've tried it and it works.  You also get pamixer which can show you 
whether or not PA sees your audio card.  Unfortunately, I have a 
different Intel chip than you, mine is the AD198x.


--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: From the top... how do I get sound working in F11 ?

2009-07-14 Thread john wendel

On 07/14/2009 11:22 AM, Linuxguy123 wrote:

I've been using F11 since it came out and it works great. But I haven't
had any sound since I did the upgrade.  Sound worked great in F10. Its
getting old not having sound.  How do I get it working ?

$ uname -a
Linux localhost.localdomain 2.6.29.5-191.fc11.i586 #1 SMP Tue Jun 16
23:11:39 EDT 2009 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux

$lsmod | grep snd
snd_hda_codec_idt  50560  1
snd_hda_intel  23920  3
snd_hda_codec  54264  2 snd_hda_codec_idt,snd_hda_intel
snd_hwdep   6580  1 snd_hda_codec
snd_pcm62556  2 snd_hda_intel,snd_hda_codec
snd_timer  17896  1 snd_pcm
snd49044  12
snd_hda_codec_idt,snd_hda_intel,snd_hda_codec,snd_hwdep,snd_pcm,snd_timer
soundcore   5404  1 snd
snd_page_alloc  7572  2 snd_hda_intel,snd_pcm

$ aplay -l
 List of PLAYBACK Hardware Devices 
card 0: Intel [HDA Intel], device 0: STAC92xx Analog [STAC92xx Analog]
   Subdevices: 1/1
   Subdevice #0: subdevice #0
card 0: Intel [HDA Intel], device 1: STAC92xx Digital [STAC92xx Digital]
   Subdevices: 1/1
   Subdevice #0: subdevice #0

$ yum list pulseaudio\*
Loaded plugins: dellsysidplugin2, downloadonly, kmdl, priorities,
refresh-packagekit
1 packages excluded due to repository priority protections
Installed Packages
pulseaudio-libs.i586 0.9.15-14.fc11 @updates
pulseaudio-libs-glib2.i586 0.9.15-14.fc11 @updates

$ cat /proc/asound/version
Advanced Linux Sound Architecture Driver Version 1.0.18a.


yum list alsa\*
Loaded plugins: dellsysidplugin2, downloadonly, kmdl, priorities,
refresh-packagekit
1 packages excluded due to repository priority protections
Installed Packages
alsa-lib.i586 1.0.20-1.fc11 installed
alsa-lib-devel.i586  1.0.20-1.fc11 installed
alsa-oss.i586 1.0.17-3.fc11 installed
alsa-oss-devel.i586 1.0.17-3.fc11 installed
alsa-oss-libs.i586 1.0.17-3.fc11 installed
alsa-utils.i586 1.0.20-3.fc11 installed

I've run alsamixer -c0 and all the levels are set to their maximums.

I've removed pulseaudio and mplayer and removed the .mplayer folder and
then reinstalled mplayer.

How should I proceed from here ?

Thanks





Looks like our junk is similar - Intel chip

I had lots of sound problems until I moved to a 2.6.30 kernel. You'll 
note that all the sound modules have very different sizes from yours. 
And your driver version is 1.0.18a while mine is 1.0.20.


I dumped pulse when I was having the sound problems, but it made no 
difference.


I'd recommend a kernel upgrade.

Regards,

John


uname -a

Linux godzilla2 2.6.30.1 #1 SMP Fri Jul 3 18:26:47 PDT 2009 i686 i686 
i386 GNU/Linux


lsmod | grep snd

snd_hda_codec_idt  34948  1
snd_hda_intel  12852  0
snd_hda_codec  35060  2 snd_hda_codec_idt,snd_hda_intel
snd_hwdep   2840  1 snd_hda_codec
snd_pcm32024  2 snd_hda_intel,snd_hda_codec
snd_timer  10144  1 snd_pcm
snd22976  6 
snd_hda_codec_idt,snd_hda_intel,snd_hda_codec,snd_hwdep,snd_pcm,snd_timer

soundcore344  1 snd
snd_page_alloc  4152  2 snd_hda_intel,snd_pcm

aplay -l

 List of PLAYBACK Hardware Devices 
card 0: Intel [HDA Intel], device 0: STAC92xx Analog [STAC92xx Analog]
  Subdevices: 1/1
  Subdevice #0: subdevice #0

cat /proc/asound/version

Advanced Linux Sound Architecture Driver Version 1.0.20.

Installed Packages
alsa-lib.i586  1.0.20-1.fc11 
installed
alsa-utils.i5861.0.20-3.fc11 
installed


--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: From the top... how do I get sound working in F11 ?

2009-07-14 Thread Linuxguy123
On Tue, 2009-07-14 at 22:13 -0400, fred smith wrote:
 On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 12:22:15PM -0600, Linuxguy123 wrote:
  I've been using F11 since it came out and it works great. But I haven't
  had any sound since I did the upgrade.  Sound worked great in F10. Its
  getting old not having sound.  How do I get it working ?
  

snip

 there's a thorough-looking guide on the fedora forums at:
 http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?t=225660
 
 Please note that I have not tried it, so I will assume no responsibility
 if it makes your computer fly around the room. :)

Its better than anything else I've seen.   Everything worked until I ran
the pulse audio device chooser, which didn't run at all.   Even when run
from the command line.  There is no error output whatsoever.  It just
hangs.  The GUI never appears.

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: From the top... how do I get sound working in F11 ?

2009-07-14 Thread gilpel
 Fedora was expecting to use PulseAudio but you removed that as your
predicate. That puts you with a vocal minority who would rather gripe
about pulse audio than make it work so it will be up to them to tell you
how to solve the sound issues that you 'fixed' by removing pulseaudio
package.

I didn't remove pulseaudio:

yum install pulseaudio

Loaded plugins: refresh-packagekit
Setting up Install Process
Package pulseaudio-0.9.15-14.fc11.x86_64 already installed and latest version
Nothing to do

Since I find my volume is too low, I tried pavucontrol as suggested. (No
pamixer available from yum.)

I receive:

Connection failed: Connection refused

I can see the settings for output devices are set to 100% in the interface
but since the connection fails, I can't be sure the figure is correct and
I can't change it.

One thing is sure: it isn't possible to get as much juice from my preamp
as SMplayer delivers. By default, the sound is rather weak, even with
alsamixer set to max.

Also, I removed Totem and installed Mplayer because I couldn't watch
features at Radio-Canada with Totem. I'm not sure how this would work with
Totem, but I can't set the system so that it plays the DVD just by
clicking on the icon.

System - Preferences - File Management - Media finds no application to
play video DVDs and there is no way to enter preferred applications. For
audio CDs, XMMS which, I believe is the default for the GNOME
installation, is still installed and it's no application again, no way
to enter any.

For playing DVDs, SMPlayer does a good job so, we're not talking about a
major glitch here, mainly if you put an icon for SMPlayer in the panel.
But if people come from the Mac world, they'll really find it terrible if
you can't start a DVD by clicking on it.

I would be better if this was fixed. Even though the default volume I now
have is not unbearably low, it would also be prefereable if there was a
way to adjust it with pavucontrol. (Maybe this works on 32 bit systems. I
have no idea.)

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: From the top... how do I get sound working in F11 ?

2009-07-14 Thread Linuxguy123
On Tue, 2009-07-14 at 21:47 -0600, Linuxguy123 wrote:
 On Tue, 2009-07-14 at 22:13 -0400, fred smith wrote:
  On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 12:22:15PM -0600, Linuxguy123 wrote:
   I've been using F11 since it came out and it works great. But I haven't
   had any sound since I did the upgrade.  Sound worked great in F10. Its
   getting old not having sound.  How do I get it working ?
   
 
 snip
 
  there's a thorough-looking guide on the fedora forums at:
  http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?t=225660
  
  Please note that I have not tried it, so I will assume no responsibility
  if it makes your computer fly around the room. :)
 
 Its better than anything else I've seen.   Everything worked until I ran
 the pulse audio device chooser, which didn't run at all.   Even when run
 from the command line.  There is no error output whatsoever.  It just
 hangs.  The GUI never appears.

I now see 3 pulse audio applets in my system tray.  Yes, 3 of them.  On
them I can set the default server, sink and source to... default, like
to Fedora Forum instructions say.   However, I still get no sound.   I
even logged into a gnome session and tried the system-config-soundcard
application... no joy, however I am still playing with settings.

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines