[Bug 193480] Review Request: sunifdef
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sunifdef https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193480 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-01 02:03 EST --- SPEC looks OK but SOURCE compilations gives some warnings -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 193446] Review Request: GLiv: OpenGL image viewer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: GLiv: OpenGL image viewer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193446
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-01 02:25 EST ---
NEED Some Work in SPEC file:-
1) Use the dist tag in release like:
Release: 1%{?dist}
2) Remove Hard coded Packager tag and Vendor tag also.
3) Use %setup -q instead %setup
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 193380] Review Request: hardinfo
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hardinfo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193380 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-01 02:30 EST --- 1)Got some Source compilation warnings In file included from computer.c:68: ./arch/this/processor.h: In function 'processor_get_capabilities_from_flags': ./arch/this/processor.h:253: warning: value computed is not used In file included from computer.c:71: ./arch/this/samba.h: In function 'scan_shared_directories': ./arch/this/samba.h:71: warning: value computed is not used 2)Add INSTALL GPL REDME files and add to SPEC %doc INSTALL GPL README -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 193480] Review Request: sunifdef
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: sunifdef
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193480
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-01 03:03 EST ---
# rpmlint sunifdef-*
E: sunifdef description-line-too-long Sunifdef is most useful to developers of
constantly evolving products with large
E: sunifdef-debuginfo script-without-shellbang
/usr/src/debug/sunifdef/src/ptr_vector.c
E: sunifdef-debuginfo wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding
/usr/src/debug/sunifdef/src/ptr_vector.c
E: sunifdef-debuginfo script-without-shellbang
/usr/src/debug/sunifdef/src/ptr_vector.h
E: sunifdef-debuginfo wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding
/usr/src/debug/sunifdef/src/ptr_vector.h
E: sunifdef-debuginfo script-without-shellbang
/usr/src/debug/sunifdef/src/state_utils.c
E: sunifdef-debuginfo wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding
/usr/src/debug/sunifdef/src/state_utils.c
= Shorten your description
= Wrong permissions on source files.
Running
find \( -name '*.c' -o -name '*.h' \) -exec chmod -x {} \;
inside of %prep fixes this.
Further issues:
* The source-tarball ships an autom4te.cache, i.e. it is rather carelessly
packaged.
I recommend to remove this autom4te.cache in %prep, in advance to running
configure. I.e. you might consider to
rm -rf autom4te.cache
in %prep
* The source-tarball ships a precompiled sunifdef linux binary.
I recommend to remove it in %prep, i.e. consider to add
rm -rf build-bin
to %prep
* The sources contain a test suite. I recommend to add a %check section to the
spec to run it:
%check
make check
* Many of the warnings are punned pointer warnings. These should not be taken
lightly. They are an indication that a package contains bad code that can causem
random problems caused by side-effects of compiler optimization.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 193499] Review Request: XPad - A sticky notes application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: XPad - A sticky notes application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193499 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-01 03:34 EST --- (In reply to comment #1) Remove warnings xpad-pad.c: In function 'xpad_pad_notify_has_decorations': xpad-pad.c:411: warning: unused variable 'shown' Please note: Though some people might consider unused variables warnings to be ugly, they are fairly harmless and mostly safe to ignore. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 193319] Review Request: chestnut-dialer - A PPP dialing program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: chestnut-dialer - A PPP dialing program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193319 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-01 03:39 EST --- Spec URL: http://lostclus.linux.kiev.ua/files/chestnut-dialer.spec SRPM URL: http://lostclus.linux.kiev.ua/files/chestnut-dialer-0.3.2-5.src.rpm * Thu Jun 1 2006 Konstantin Korikov [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0.3.2-5 - Source tag is URL - Dist tag in release -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 182254] Review Request: SS5
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SS5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182254 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-01 04:52 EST --- Ok! Thank you very much for support. I think it is necessary for me to have a sponsor and I would be happy if you could be my sponsor. But now I need some detail about CVS, because I'm not used to it. Sponsor can also import my packgage into cvs? Bye -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 178900] Review Request: monodoc
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monodoc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178900 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-01 04:57 EST --- SRPM Name or Url: http://www.smmp.salford.ac.uk/packages/monodoc-1.1.13-9.src.rpm Spec Name or Url: http://www.smmp.salford.ac.uk/packages/monodoc.spec Changes Fixed the /usr/bin problem (#18) Disabled debug package (#18} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 178904] Review Request: Monodevelop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Monodevelop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178904 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-01 05:00 EST --- Spec Name or Url: http://www.smmp.salford.ac.uk/packages/monodevelop.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://www.smmp.salford.ac.uk/packages/monodevelop-0.11-2.src.rpm Bump to 0.11 Fixes for x86_64/ia64 PKG_CONFIG_PATH fix added in Includes devel package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189092] Review Request: boo
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: boo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189092 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-01 05:04 EST --- Spec URL: http://www.smmp.salford.ac.uk/packages/boo.spec SRPM URL: http://www.smmp.salford.ac.uk/packages/boo-0.7.5.2013-7.src.rpm Lots of fixes and is now happy on x86_64/ia64 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 192600] Review Request: sflowtool - Command line utility for analyzing sFlow data
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sflowtool - Command line utility for analyzing sFlow data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192600 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-01 05:21 EST --- When i try to build RPM from SPEC file on i386 FC5, i got many warnings like sflowtool.c: In function 'printAddress': sflowtool.c:441: warning: too many arguments for format sflowtool.c: In function 'writeCountersLine': sflowtool.c:523: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 3 has type 'u_int32_t' sflowtool.c:523: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'u_int32_t' sflowtool.c:523: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 6 has type 'u_int32_t' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 177512] Review Request: mysql-connector-net
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mysql-connector-net https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177512 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-01 05:26 EST --- Spec Name or Url: http://www.smmp.salford.ac.uk/packages/mysql-connector-net.spec Updated spec file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 192583] Review Request: php-pear-XML-Parser - XML parsing class based on PHP's bundled expat
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-XML-Parser - XML parsing class based on PHP's bundled expat https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192583 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-01 05:28 EST --- Not a Review but some hints on improving SPEC:- 1) Remove Provides tag RPM will generate an appropriate Provides: entry itself. 2) rpmlint gives error on using License: PHP License 3) Add some Documnetation Files like README, INSTALL -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 192583] Review Request: php-pear-XML-Parser - XML parsing class based on PHP's bundled expat
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-XML-Parser - XML parsing class based on PHP's bundled expat https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192583 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-01 05:29 EST --- Also when i built repm from SPEC i got warning: pear/XML_Parser requires package pear/PEAR -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 192432] Review Request: compiz
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192432 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-01 06:52 EST --- I have been working with Alphonse on getting these packages running on FC5. There are 3 dependencies required. One is just the control-center-devel part of the package. I have a spec with the needed changes from the lastest in rawhide (I can create a patch). The other two are libsvg, and libsvg-cairo with devels. For Xgl you will need to also add glitz. One possability is to include the devel files with compiz, I believe its only 3 or 4 files. I have created new SRPMs based on those by Alphonse and built all required packages on both i386 and x86_64 in mock, with only minor rpmlint warnings. The source packages can be found at the following URL: http://www.ece.ucdavis.edu/~ewwork/repo/5/SRPMS/ Maybe I can help speed up getting this package accepted. Seeing as how Ubuntu 6.09 and SuSE 10.1 now have thes packages included I think FE should fill this gap for Fedora users. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 192432] Review Request: compiz
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192432 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-01 07:08 EST --- Created an attachment (id=130330) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=130330action=view) control-center-2.14.1-1.fc5.2 add devel patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 193480] Review Request: sunifdef
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sunifdef https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193480 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-01 07:10 EST --- Thanks Ralf and Parag for your comments - I will implement all your suggestions at the weekend. Regarding the compilation warnings - I have already been in touch with the author about these, and he's taking a look. I'm in the process of looking through them myself too, to see if I can offer fixes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 192432] Review Request: compiz
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192432 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-01 07:16 EST --- Created an attachment (id=130332) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=130332action=view) control-center-2.14.2-2 add devel patch Sorry for the badly worded comment before its getting a little too late. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 193470] Review Request: renrot - A program to rename and rotate files according to EXIF tags
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: renrot - A program to rename and rotate files according to EXIF tags https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193470 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-01 07:35 EST --- Why? The spec's changelog is related to spec changes and so on. I think, if you should like to get changes list of project you should read the project's inside documentation such ChangeLog or NEWS files, isn't it? (Look to wine package for example) Updated version here: SRPM URL: ftp://andriy.asplinux.com.ua/pub/people/andy/extras/renrot-0.20-1.src. rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 190502] Review Request: sportstracker
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sportstracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190502 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-01 07:43 EST --- The README was already included in the tarball, there is not reason to increase version. Ignoring comment #5, which makes no sense. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 182415] Review Request: man-pages-uk - Ukrainian man pages from Linux Documentation Project
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: man-pages-uk - Ukrainian man pages from Linux Documentation Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182415 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-01 07:51 EST --- Rename version here: Spec Name or Url: ftp://andriy.asplinux.com.ua/pub/people/andy/extras/man-pages- uk.spec SRPM Name or Url: ftp://andriy.asplinux.com.ua/pub/people/andy/extras/man-pages- uk-0.1-0.1.20060328.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 193493] Review Request: iksemel - An XML parser library designed for Jabber applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: iksemel - An XML parser library designed for Jabber applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193493 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-01 08:29 EST --- Update Spec/SRPMS: Spec URL: http://www.ocjtech.us/iksemel-1.2-2.spec SRPM URL: http://www.ocjtech.us/iksemel-1.2-2.src.rpm * Tue May 30 2006 Jeffrey C. Ollie [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 1.2-2 - Add texinfo BR -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 192432] Review Request: compiz
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192432 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||193679 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-01 08:44 EST --- (In reply to comment #8) Created an attachment (id=130332) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=130332action=view) [edit] control-center-2.14.2-2 add devel patch Sorry for the badly worded comment before its getting a little too late. The whole control-center problem should be worked on and solved in Bug 193679; (In reply to comment #6) For Xgl you will need to also add glitz. One possability is to include the devel files with compiz, I believe its only 3 or 4 files. That sounds really dirty. Why not provide a proper glitz package? And one bug one package please, otherwise it will confuse everything. BTW and just out of interest: does compitz work with Xaiglx / Xorg 7.1 these days? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 193679] Review Request: control-center-devel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: control-center-devel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193679 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||192432 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 190664] Review Request: keyutils - Kernel key management userspace utilities
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: keyutils - Kernel key management userspace utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190664 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-01 08:49 EST --- Ralf? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189705] Review Request: aiccu
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aiccu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189705 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-01 09:14 EST --- Not a Review but found one thing in SPEC SOURCE is not URL -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189713] Review Request: gnubg
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnubg https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189713 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-01 09:23 EST --- rpmlint on gnubg-20060530-1.src.rpm gives E: gnubg configure-without-libdir-spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 193679] Review Request: control-center-devel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: control-center-devel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193679 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |ASSIGNED --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-01 09:29 EST --- .a and .la are not needed by the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189889] Review Request: vkeybd - Virtual MIDI Keyboard
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: vkeybd - Virtual MIDI Keyboard
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189889
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-01 09:31 EST ---
Not a Review but some Chnages you need in SPEC :-
1) Use of dist tag in Release tag
2) Consider using make %{?_smp_mflags} in %build
3) Include License file
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189949] Review Request: mystun - STUN (Simple Traversal of UDP through NATs) server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mystun - STUN (Simple Traversal of UDP through NATs) server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189949 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-01 09:34 EST --- SOURCE tag is not URL -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189713] Review Request: gnubg
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: gnubg
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189713
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778
nThis||
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-01 10:39 EST ---
No formal review, just the results of a quick scan, which has turned up enough
for you to work on for now:
Why call autogen.sh? thats concidered bad practice unless absolutly nescesarry,
and if you must you should do so from %setup not %install
Also BR: automake implies autoconf, so the BR: autoconf is extranous and should
be removed. (Notice if you remove the autogen.sh call that you then should also
remove the autoxxx and libtool BR's).
Also BR:L glib2 is plain wrong this is a gtk1 app right, so it should be
glib-devel, which is implied by BR: gtk+-devel, please remove the BR glib2.
Don't call ./configure yourself instead use %configure (that will fix the
rpmlint error) you can call it with your own args added like this:
%configure --with-python \
--without-gdbm \
--without-guile \
--without-timecontrol \
--without-board3d
make prefix=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_prefix} install-strip
is dead wrong, use:
make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT
Stripping is wrong, rpmbuild will do this for you, and if you DIY, the
-debuginfo package will be useless.
Unowned directories:
%{_datadir}/gnubg
%{_datadir}/gnubg/met
%{_datadir}/gnubg/doc
%{_datadir}/gnubg/scripts
%{_datadir}/gnubg/sounds
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 190029] Review Request: whysynth-dssi - DSSI software synthesizer plugin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: whysynth-dssi - DSSI software synthesizer plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190029 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-01 11:15 EST --- (In reply to comment #2) Remove Twice written %changelog in SPEC file Oops.. Fixed: Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/whysynth-dssi.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/whysynth-dssi-20060122-3.src.rpm Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 192432] Review Request: compiz
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192432 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-01 11:19 EST --- Yes compiz work with Xaiglx. http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg/2006-March/013577.html I will try to compile compiz with these patch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 193772] Review Request: Xbae - Matrix, Caption, Input widgets for Motif
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Xbae - Matrix,Caption,Input widgets for Motif https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193772 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-01 11:59 EST --- I have allready proposed Xbae here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192418 I think my proposal is a bit better since it is simple and also package the examples. But I should update to the latest version. If you really want to maintain Xbae, no problem I'll do a patch to your spec. Also I depend on Wcl to verify that the corresponding example builds. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 193787] New: Review Request: scite - Scintilla based text editor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193787 Summary: Review Request: scite - Scintilla based text editor Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: fedora-package-review@redhat.com Spec URL: http://calle255.org/scite/scite.spec SRPM URL: http://calle255.org/scite/scite-1.69-1.src.rpm Description: SciTE is a SCIntilla based Text Editor. Originally built to demonstrate Scintilla, it has grown to be a generally useful editor with facilities for building and running programs. This is my first package so I'd appreciate a sponsor :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 193772] Review Request: Xbae - Matrix, Caption, Input widgets for Motif
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Xbae - Matrix,Caption,Input widgets for Motif https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193772 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-01 12:19 EST --- I don't really want to maintain the spec file, I already work on the sources :) I'll gladly let you take care of this, and mark this report as a duplicate of yours. wrt. the examples, I think you may want to split them out in xbae-examples if that's even possible. (I don't know rpm all that well). Cheers, Tobias. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 192418 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 192418] Review Request: xbae - Xbae widget set
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xbae - Xbae widget set https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192418 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-01 12:19 EST --- *** Bug 193772 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 193772] Review Request: Xbae - Matrix, Caption, Input widgets for Motif
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Xbae - Matrix,Caption,Input widgets for Motif https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193772 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-01 12:28 EST --- Currently I package them in xbae-devel. I don't think they deserve a separate subpackage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 193772] Review Request: Xbae - Matrix, Caption, Input widgets for Motif
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Xbae - Matrix,Caption,Input widgets for Motif https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193772 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 192876] Review Request: V2Strip ID3v2(Mp3 Files) tags remover
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: V2Strip ID3v2(Mp3 Files) tags remover https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192876 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-01 13:27 EST --- Fixed error in comment #1 SPEC: http://www.netservers.org/packages/rpm/v2strip.spec SRPMS: http://www.netservers.org/packages/rpm/v2strip-0.2.10-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 193103] Review Request: Listen
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Listen https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193103 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-01 13:46 EST --- Listen has no INSTALL, README files. Anyway, I added licence files (gpl.txt and copy) and fixed some issues with rpmlint. http://darkenphoenix.free.fr/RPMS/RPMS/Extras/SPECS/listen.spec http://darkenphoenix.free.fr/RPMS/RPMS/Extras/SRPMS/listen-0.4.3-4.src.rpm rpmlint output $ rpmlint /home/karl/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/listen-0.4.3-4.i386.rpm W: listen unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/listen/mmkeys.so @Hugo Cisneiros: great news :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 193794] New: Review Request: prosper - A LaTeX class to produce high quality slides
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193794 Summary: Review Request: prosper - A LaTeX class to produce high quality slides Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: fedora-package-review@redhat.com Spec Name or Url: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/prosper.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/prosper-0.cvs20060601-1.src.rpm Description: Prosper is a LaTeX class aiming at offering an environment for writing high-quality slides for both printing and displaying with a video-projector. It offers many features for lively presentations, such as incremental display. LaTeX package naming appears to be somewhat in flux. Should this be texmf-prosper, latex-prosper, or ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 193794] Review Request: prosper - A LaTeX class to produce high quality slides
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prosper - A LaTeX class to produce high quality slides https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193794 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||NOTABUG --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-01 13:53 EST --- Already in Extras. Known as tetex-prosper. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189713] Review Request: gnubg
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnubg https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189713 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-01 13:55 EST --- (In reply to comment #6) (In reply to comment #5) Why call autogen.sh? thats concidered bad practice unless absolutly I am calling autogen.sh because the source is nightly tarball from CVS not containing a configure file. The latest available source I found is contained in a SRPM more than a year old (http://www.acepoint.de/GnuBG/redhat/gnubg-0.15-1.src.rpm). The nightly CVS tarballs seem to be the only recent published sources available. Yes, Thats a good reason, I should have spotted that. myself :) Anyways all the other points still remain to be fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 193794] Review Request: prosper - A LaTeX class to produce high quality slides
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prosper - A LaTeX class to produce high quality slides https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193794 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-01 14:03 EST --- Where is the review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 193794] Review Request: prosper - A LaTeX class to produce high quality slides
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prosper - A LaTeX class to produce high quality slides https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193794 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-01 14:09 EST --- Orion, You have to check the mailing list archives. The review was done before the bugzilla review tickets. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 193794] Review Request: prosper - A LaTeX class to produce high quality slides
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prosper - A LaTeX class to produce high quality slides https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193794 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 193804] New: Review Request: glitz
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193804 Summary: Review Request: glitz Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: fedora-package-review@redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.ece.ucdavis.edu/~ewwork/repo/5/SPECS/glitz.spec SRPM URL: http://www.ece.ucdavis.edu/~ewwork/repo/5/SRPMS/glitz-0.5.6-1.src.rpm Description: Glitz is an OpenGL image compositing library. Glitz provides Porter/Duff compositing of images and implicit mask generation for geometric primitives including trapezoids, triangles, and rectangles. This had been tested with mock and rpmlint. This package is required to build Xgl. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 193804] Review Request: glitz
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glitz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193804 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added External Bug||https://bugzilla.redhat.com/ Reference||bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192 ||436 External Bug|https://bugzilla.redhat.com/| Reference|bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192| |432 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 191017] Review Request: eclipse-subclipse
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-subclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191017 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: subclipse |Review Request: eclipse- ||subclipse --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-01 14:43 EST --- Done http://www.marcanoonline.com/downloads/fedora/package_submissions/subclipse/eclipse-subclipse.spec http://www.marcanoonline.com/downloads/fedora/package_submissions/subclipse/eclipse-subclipse-1.0.1-5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 193154] Review Request: asymptote - Descriptive vector graphics language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asymptote - Descriptive vector graphics language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193154 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-01 14:46 EST --- Thanks for the review. Imported and built for FC-4, FC-5, and devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 193806] New: Review Request: libsvg
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193806 Summary: Review Request: libsvg Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: fedora-package-review@redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.ece.ucdavis.edu/~ewwork/repo/5/SPECS/libsvg.spec SRPM URL: http://www.ece.ucdavis.edu/~ewwork/repo/5/SRPMS/libsvg-0.1.4-1.src.rpm Description: libsvg renders SVG documents but cannot render SVG alone. It requires an external rendering engine to be provided via a callback-based interface. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 193807] New: Review Request: libsvg-cairo
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193807 Summary: Review Request: libsvg-cairo Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: fedora-package-review@redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.ece.ucdavis.edu/~ewwork/repo/5/SPECS/libsvg-cairo.spec SRPM URL: http://www.ece.ucdavis.edu/~ewwork/repo/5/SRPMS/libsvg-cairo-0.1.6-1.src.rpm Description: libsvg-cairo provides the ability to render SVG content from files or buffers. All rendering is performed using the cairo rendering library. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 193806] Review Request: libsvg
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libsvg https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193806 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added External Bug||https://bugzilla.redhat.com/ Reference||bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192 ||432 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 193154] Review Request: asymptote - Descriptive vector graphics language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asymptote - Descriptive vector graphics language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193154 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-01 15:02 EST --- Random/pending notes: Upstream will release version 1.07 in the next days: * includes the emacs init file * make install-all will also install the info file (patches are now all in svn) new BR: ImageMagick The build requirement /usr/bin/texi2dvi can now be replaced by texinfo-tex As of today's updates, the FC-4 and FC-5 texinfo RPM started also providing texinfo-tex. Due to performance reasons upstream would also like to see the package compiled * with -O3, and * with a single threaded version of gc (single-threaded instead multi-threaded -- 15% improvement) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 191606] Review Request: lineak_kdeplugins - KDE-based actions for lineakd
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lineak_kdeplugins - KDE-based actions for lineakd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191606 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-01 15:05 EST --- Oddly, if you run rpmlint on the src.rpm, it complains about /lib being hardcoded; I guess it just does a search for /lib and finds your call to sed. Other than that, rpmlint is silent. Review: * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. * source files match upstream: 4ddfc475e4df27f8822e0b08c0f701b5 lineak_kdeplugins-0.8.4.tar.gz 4ddfc475e4df27f8822e0b08c0f701b5 lineak_kdeplugins-0.8.4.tar.gz-srpm * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * rpmlint is silent. final provides and requires are sane: amarokplugin.so()(64bit) jukplugin.so()(64bit) kdesktopplugin.so()(64bit) kmailplugin.so()(64bit) kmixplugin.so()(64bit) konqplugin.so()(64bit) kscdplugin.so()(64bit) lineak_kdeplugins = 0.8.4 lineak-kdeplugins = 0.8.4-4.fc6 - kdelibs libICE.so.6()(64bit) libSM.so.6()(64bit) libX11.so.6()(64bit) libXext.so.6()(64bit) libdl.so.2()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libkdecore.so.4()(64bit) libkdeui.so.4()(64bit) libkio.so.4()(64bit) liblineak.so.0()(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libpng12.so.0()(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit) libqt-mt.so.3()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4)(64bit) libz.so.1()(64bit) lineakd = 0.8.4 * shared libraries are present, but internal to lineakd so no need to call ldconfig. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates (the plugins directory is created by lineakd, which is a dependency). * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * %clean is present. * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 191607] Review Request: lineak_xosdplugin - Onscreen display support for lineakd
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lineak_xosdplugin - Onscreen display support for lineakd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191607 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 191582] Review Request: xgalaxy - Galaga clone for X11
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xgalaxy - Galaga clone for X11 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191582 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: xgalaga - |Review Request: xgalaxy - |Galaga clone for X11|Galaga clone for X11 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-01 15:33 EST --- Fixing bug report summary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 193584] Review Request: nucleo - Toolkit for exploring new uses of video
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nucleo - Toolkit for exploring new uses of video https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193584 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 177080] Review Request: metisse
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: metisse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177080 Bug 177080 depends on bug 193584, which changed state. Bug 193584 Summary: Review Request: nucleo - Toolkit for exploring new uses of video https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193584 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 192876] Review Request: V2Strip ID3v2(Mp3 Files) tags remover
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: V2Strip ID3v2(Mp3 Files) tags remover https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192876 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-01 16:39 EST --- BLOCKERS: * Package in non-standard group (Applications/Shells), see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/RPMGroups MINOR: * You can drop the NEWS from the docs, since it appears to have the same information as the Changelog file. * Shouldn't refer to the package name in Summary. A better one might be 'ID3v2 tag remover'. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 191507] Review Request: wifi-radar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wifi-radar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191507 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-01 16:40 EST --- Hmm. rpmlint appears to give useful output when run against an installed package, but not when run against an SRPM file. Interesting. Everything cannot be checked from the SRPM alone. And some checks make sense only when run against an installed package, so checking an uninstalled binary RPM won't necessarily reveal everything either. The best check coverage is achieved by checking the SRPM and all binary packages resulting from it after *installing* them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 193820] New: Review Request: libcm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193820 Summary: Review Request: libcm Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.daimi.au.dk/~sandmann/libcm.spec SRPM URL: http://www.daimi.au.dk/~sandmann/libcm-0.0.22-1.src.rpm Description: This package is a library containing various a GL scene graph, and some wrapper classes around X resources. It has until now been statically linked into metacity, but that is undesirable for various reasons. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 191607] Review Request: lineak_xosdplugin - Onscreen display support for lineakd
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lineak_xosdplugin - Onscreen display support for lineakd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191607 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-01 16:34 EST --- Just got a build failure: /bin/sh ../libtool --silent --mode=link --tag=CXX g++ -Wnon-virtual-dtor -Wno-long-long -Wundef -ansi -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=500 -D_BSD_SOURCE -Wcast-align -Wconversion -Wchar-subscripts -Wall -W -Wpointer-arith -Wwrite-strings -O2 -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -Wformat-security -Wmissing-format-attribute -fno-exceptions -fno-check-new -fno-common -LNONE -lX11 -lXext -ldl -o xosdplugin.la -rpath /usr/lib64/lineakd/plugins -module -avoid-version xosdplugin.lo xosdctrl.lo -lX11 -llineak -L/usr/lib64 -lxosd -lpthread -lXext -lX11 -lXinerama -lxosd -llineak ../libtool: line 1573: cd: NONE: No such file or directory libtool: link: cannot determine absolute directory name of `NONE' make[2]: *** [xosdplugin.la] Error 1 I'm not really sure what's up here; I'll try to take a closer look later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 192436] Review Request: xorg-x11-server-Xgl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-server-Xgl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192436 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-01 16:54 EST --- I have made new SPEC files somewhat based on the ones by Alphonse. These include a more updated Mesa version. These build fine on both i386 and x86_64 under mock with very minor rpmlint warning. SPEC URL: http://www.ece.ucdavis.edu/~ewwork/repo/5/SPECS/xgl.spec SRPM URL: http://www.ece.ucdavis.edu/~ewwork/repo/5/SRPMS/xorg-x11-server-Xgl-0.0.1cvs-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 192436] Review Request: xorg-x11-server-Xgl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-server-Xgl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192436 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added External Bug||https://bugzilla.redhat.com/ Reference||bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193 ||804 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-01 16:56 EST --- Oh I forgot to add that this package requires that glitz also be installed which is awaiting review at bug #193804. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189092] Review Request: boo
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: boo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189092 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-01 17:01 EST --- (Meanwhile, upstream version is 0.7.6.2237.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 193807] Review Request: libsvg-cairo
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libsvg-cairo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193807 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||193806 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 193806] Review Request: libsvg
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libsvg https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193806 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||193807 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 192432] Review Request: compiz
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192432 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||193807 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 193807] Review Request: libsvg-cairo
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libsvg-cairo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193807 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||192432 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 192436] Review Request: xorg-x11-server-Xgl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-server-Xgl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192436 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added External Bug||https://bugzilla.redhat.com/ Reference||bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192 ||432 External Bug|https://bugzilla.redhat.com/| Reference|bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193| |804 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 192432] Review Request: compiz
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192432 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-01 17:11 EST --- The following SRPM has a newer Mesa and is checked with mock and rpmlint. SPEC URL: http://www.ece.ucdavis.edu/~ewwork/repo/5/SPECS/compiz.spec SRPM URL: http://www.ece.ucdavis.edu/~ewwork/repo/5/SRPMS/compiz-0.0.11cvs-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 176374] Review Request: nagios-plugins
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nagios-plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176374 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-01 17:57 EST --- MD5SUMS: 766f257aa209759b94f68a8a37119cf5 nagios-plugins-1.4.3-4.src.rpm 2c40fc69d51cc979e85150870a1daa93 nagios-plugins-1.4.3.tar.gz f4e1bb47d20816d128f9704be7bd6b04 nagios-plugins.spec PUBLISH++ This is my vote for approval. Notes: * The following itens should be corrected (maybe after importing the package to the CVS repo) - The last changelog entry needs to be corrected (release bump) - The empty export statement before the configure macro should be removed * Could someone (re)build this package in a 64bit system and express his vote? * I have assigned this ticket to me. If someone wants it, please feel free to reassign it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189092] Review Request: boo
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: boo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189092 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-01 18:19 EST --- I know - however, I'm working off the released tarballs which currently sit at 0.7.6.2103. Currently, my dev system at work uses 2237 and it has issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 178900] Review Request: monodoc
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monodoc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178900 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-01 18:23 EST --- Thanks - if it's good to go, I'll commit it tonight -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 192603] Review Request: openalpp - Object Oriented version of OpenAL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openalpp - Object Oriented version of OpenAL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192603 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 193772] Review Request: Xbae - Matrix, Caption, Input widgets for Motif
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Xbae - Matrix,Caption,Input widgets for Motif https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193772 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-01 18:55 EST --- That's wierd, my devel rpm includes /usr/share/aclocal/ac_find_xbae.m4 5618 1149167337 34839c3fd5b8d6d7d6dc693d4c2ddce9 0100644 root root 0 0 0 X which turns out to be a copy of the ac_find_xbae.m4 that's at the top of the source tree. Part of the patch I include in the rpm is supposed to make that one get installed. Tobias. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 193342] Review Request: cegui - Free library providing windowing and widgets for graphics APIs / engines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cegui - Free library providing windowing and widgets for graphics APIs / engines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193342 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-01 19:36 EST --- Latest lua released, now with a shared lib. No reply as yet from the maintainers regarding the license of tolua++ although I suspect it's probably MIT, but that should be confirmed. I'll proceed with at least getting an RPM constructed in the meantime. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 193312] Review Request: DevIL - A cross-platform image library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: DevIL - A cross-platform image library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193312 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-01 19:39 EST --- Built OK, awaiting signing. Closing as NEXTRELEASE. Cheers Hans. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 193342] Review Request: cegui - Free library providing windowing and widgets for graphics APIs / engines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cegui - Free library providing windowing and widgets for graphics APIs / engines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193342 Bug 193342 depends on bug 193312, which changed state. Bug 193312 Summary: Review Request: DevIL - A cross-platform image library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193312 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 178900] Review Request: monodoc
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monodoc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178900 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-01 19:46 EST --- For some reason, if I define _libdir to be /usr/lib, things go wrong for 64 bit architecture whereas with this macro, things work correctly. It could just be my buildsystems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 178900] Review Request: monodoc
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: monodoc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178900
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-01 19:56 EST ---
Well, using %{_exec_prefix}/lib is no different than using %{_libdir}. Refer to
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/RPMMacros
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 191607] Review Request: lineak_xosdplugin - Onscreen display support for lineakd
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lineak_xosdplugin - Onscreen display support for lineakd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191607 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-01 19:58 EST --- The issue was simply a missing BuildRequires: libXt-devel; I'll add it and proceed with the review. Note that the ChangeLog file has zero length and should not be packaged: E: lineak-xosdplugin zero-length /usr/share/doc/lineak-xosdplugin-0.8.4/ChangeLog These are pretty quick fixes, so I'll go ahead and approve and you can fix them when you check in. Review: * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. * source files match upstream: 36f519b21e7c7257bd9af6543f7fd9fc lineak_xosdplugin-0.8.4.tar.gz 36f519b21e7c7257bd9af6543f7fd9fc lineak_xosdplugin-0.8.4.tar.gz-srpm * latest version is being packaged. O BuildRequires are proper (after adding libXt-devel as above). O package builds in mock (development, x86_64) (after fixing BRs.) X rpmlint complains about ChangeLog. * final provides and requires are sane: lineak_xosdplugin = 0.8.4 xosdplugin.so()(64bit) lineak-xosdplugin = 0.8.4-4.fc6 - libX11.so.6()(64bit) libXext.so.6()(64bit) libXinerama.so.1()(64bit) libdl.so.2()(64bit) liblineak.so.0()(64bit) libxosd.so.2()(64bit) lineakd = 0.8.4 xosd = 2.1 * one shared library is present, but it is internal to lineakd and so there's no need to call ldconfig. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * %clean is present. * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. APPROVED, but please don't package the zero length ChangeLog and don't forget to add the BR: libXt-devel so the package will build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 192060] Review Request: blobwars - Mission and Objective based 2D Platform Game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blobwars - Mission and Objective based 2D Platform Game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192060 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 178900] Review Request: monodoc
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: monodoc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178900
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-01 20:10 EST ---
Unless I'm mistaken, %{_libdir} is whatever lib the architecture specifies
(/usr/lib64 or /usr/lib). However %{_exec_prefix}/lib will always go to /usr/lib
without exception
I'll check the URL anyway. As the +1 Accept had been given, I've committed and
built the package, but until this is resolved, I'll leave the bug open.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 187325] Review Request: jaws
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: jaws
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187325
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package-
|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-01 21:06 EST ---
I noticed that this review request had been inactive so I thought I'd give a
quick look.
Some simple things to fix:
Release: 1.%{?dist}
You should omit the dot; %{dist} includes a dot so you'll end up with two.
rpmlint warnings:
W: jaws summary-ended-with-dot A framework and content management system for
building dynamic Web sites.
Summary: should not end in a period.
W: jaws incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.6.1-1 0.6.1-1..fc6
Not sure what's up here; perhaps it doesn't like the dot in Release:.
E: jaws script-without-shellbang
/var/www/jaws/plugins/AntiSpammers/languages/ro/AntiSpammers.php
Lots of these (61, to be exact); I don't believe these PHP scripts, css files,
xml files or javascript files should be executable.
E: jaws wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding
/var/www/jaws/plugins/AntiSpammers/languages/ro/AntiSpammers.php
Lots of these as well (41); a quick trip through tr should fix them up.
E: jaws version-control-internal-file
/var/www/jaws/include/pear/MDB2/Driver/Function/CVS/Entries
CVS directories and anything under them should just be deleted.
E: jaws zero-length
/var/www/jaws/include/Extras/piwi/piwidata/js/jscalendar/lang/calendar-af.utf8.js
There are four zero-length files shipped:
/var/www/jaws/include/Extras/piwi/piwidata/js/jscalendar/lang/calendar-af.utf8.js
/usr/share/doc/jaws-0.6.1/NEWS
/var/www/jaws/include/Extras/geshi/geshi/css-gen.cfg
/var/www/jaws/include/Extras/piwi/piwidata/js/jscalendar/lang/calendar-af.js
These shouldn't be included unless they're required for something.
Other than these the package looks good. However, I don't see your address in
owners.list, nor do I see anything that obviously matches your address in the
accounts system. Do you require sponsorship?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 193499] Review Request: XPad - A sticky notes application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: XPad - A sticky notes application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193499 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-01 21:33 EST --- Thanks. I've added a patch (also sent upstream) to remove those unused variable declarations in 2.11-2. Spec: http://www.thecodergeek.com/downloads/fedora/xpad.spec SRPM: http://www.thecodergeek.com/downloads/fedora/xpad-2.11-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 193804] Review Request: glitz
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glitz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193804 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-01 22:44 EST --- Some comments: * IMO, it should be considered to split this package into 2 subpackages: glitz and glitz-glx, because the package internally consists of libglitz and several backends, with libglitz-glx being one them. Splitting it would allow more fine-grained deps, and thereby would help avoid unnecessary deps of apps/libs based on glitz. * The deps of the devel package don't seem to be correct: - libglitz doesn't seem to depend on any X or GL library. - libglitz-glx seems to depend libX11-devel and libGL-devel, but not on further libX*-devel, in particular it doesn't not depend on libXt-devel. * The package ships manpages, but doesn't install them. May-be it's worth considering to install them. * The configure script carries several options defaulting to true: --disable-glx Disable glitz's GLX backend --disable-agl Disable glitz's AGL backend --enable-eglEnable glitz's EGL backend --disable-wgl Disable glitz's WGL backend This will render building this package outside of a chroot-environment non-deterministic, should one of these GL backends land in Fedora. I.e. I recommend to add --enable-glx --disable-agl --disable-egl --disable-wgl to %configure -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 190243] Review Request: scim-bridge (gtkimm module in C)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scim-bridge (gtkimm module in C) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190243 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-01 23:26 EST --- FE4 and FE5 packages have also been built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 193783] Review Request: mesa-mangled - Mangled Mesa graphics libraries for off-screen rendering
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mesa-mangled - Mangled Mesa graphics libraries for off-screen rendering https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193783 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-02 00:31 EST --- Not a Review but some comments on SRC package rpmlint gives W: mesa-mangled invalid-license MIT/X11 W: mesa-mangled strange-permission redhat-mesa-target 0755 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 193784] Review Request: linuxdcpp - A port of DC++ to Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linuxdcpp - A port of DC++ to Linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193784 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-02 00:31 EST --- Not a Review but some comments on SRC package rpmlint gives W: linuxdcpp summary-ended-with-dot A port of DC++ to Linux. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 191743] Review Request: sysprof - a sampling CPU profiler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sysprof - a sampling CPU profiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191743 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-02 00:43 EST --- Some Comments:- rpmling gives error as E: sysprof configure-without-libdir-spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 191745] Review Request: sysprof-kmod - kernel module for the sysprof profiler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sysprof-kmod - kernel module for the sysprof profiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191745 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-02 00:48 EST --- Some comments:- rpmlint sysprof-kmod-1.0.2-2.2.6.16_1.2111_FC5.src.rpm gives output as W: sysprof-kmod summary-not-capitalized sysprof kernel module W: sysprof-kmod strange-permission kmodtool 0666 E: sysprof-kmod configure-without-libdir-spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 193804] Review Request: glitz
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glitz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193804 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-02 00:53 EST --- I will be gone this weekend, but I will work on these issues in the near future and update the packages for re-evaluation. Thanks for the feedback. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 193846] New: Review Request: ganglia - Ganglia Distributed Monitoring System
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193846 Summary: Review Request: ganglia - Ganglia Distributed Monitoring System Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: fedora-package-review@redhat.com Spec URL: http://wilsonet.com/packages/ganglia/ganglia.spec SRPM URL: http://wilsonet.com/packages/ganglia/ganglia-3.0.3-1.src.rpm Description: Ganglia is a scalable, real-time monitoring and execution environment with all execution requests and statistics expressed in an open well-defined XML format. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 193842] Review Request: GAIM
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GAIM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193842 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-02 01:04 EST --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 193841 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 193841] Review Request: GAIM
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GAIM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193841 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-02 01:05 EST --- *** Bug 193842 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
