Re: [Fink-devel] FinkCommander now available by CVS at SourceForge

2002-03-23 Thread Steven Burr


On Thursday, March 21, 2002, at 10:16 PM, Jeremy Higgs wrote:

 One suggestion that I have, though...

Thanks for the suggestions.  I've put them in my TODO file.  My initial 
reactions:

 Perhaps when you click on the name of
 a package, the program should show the information immediately, instead 
 of
 having to go to 'Source - Describe'. This may take some tweaking on 
 Fink's
 behalf, though... As it sometimes takes a while for Fink to retrieve the
 information.

This would be easy enough to do by implementing the 
tableViewSelectionDidChange: delegate method.  As a user, I would find 
it annoying, but it could be an option.

 Perhaps parsing the info returned by 'fink describe package' would 
 also be
 useful.
[snip]

I don't think I'll be doing this one any time soon.  Too much work for 
too little return compared to the other changes I have in mind.  But as 
I've said before, other developers are welcome to join in.  : )

 One thing that might also be nice is to display the dependencies of a
 package. (Again, not by default... Perhaps on a different 'level'), but 
 as
 Fink currently doesn't output this information in 'fink describe', that
 would be a bit difficult...

I would like this a lot, and it will be easy if and when the Objective-C 
perl bridge becomes available.  At the moment, it would require a call 
to the resolve_depends method for PkgVersion objects from a custom perl 
script.  I use a custom script now to gather most of the information 
from the table, but it's kind of a pain for various reasons, and I will 
probably eliminate it now that fink list offers the -t option.  So I'll 
probably hold off until the bridge it ready.

Thanks, again.  I hope you're enjoying FinkCommander.


___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel



Re: [Fink-devel] FinkCommander now available by CVS at SourceForge

2002-03-21 Thread Steven Burr

On Thursday, March 21, 2002, at 05:34 AM, Max Horn wrote:

 you should remove the build directory from CVS! It really doesn't 
 belong there. Since it's a bit tricky (err, impossible) to remove 
 directories from CVS, you should file a support request with 
 SourceForge, telling them your project name and that you want them to 
 remove that dir again, and they'll do  it within 24-72 hours (if not, 
 tell me, and I talk to some of my friends there).

Done.  Thanks, Max.

I'd like to make sure I avoid this problem in the future, so I have a 
question for the group.  Once SourceForge support removes the directory 
from the repository, can I safely commit in the future without first 
moving build out of the Project Builder folder? My (obviously limited) 
understanding is that a file or directory not already in a cvs 
repository needs to be put there with the add command before it will 
be included in future commits.


___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel



Re: [Fink-devel] FinkCommander now available by CVS at SourceForge

2002-03-21 Thread Benjamin Reed

Steven Burr [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
 I'd like to make sure I avoid this problem in the future, so I have a 
 question for the group.  Once SourceForge support removes the directory 
 from the repository, can I safely commit in the future without first 
 moving build out of the Project Builder folder? My (obviously limited) 
 understanding is that a file or directory not already in a cvs 
 repository needs to be put there with the add command before it will 
 be included in future commits.

It should be safe to commit... when you update you should get a '?' before
the build directory.  If you want to be more permanent about it, make a
.cvsignore file with only the line:

build

...in it, in the top-level directory, and check that in.  CVS will ignore
that directory from then on, if it exists locally.

-- 
Benjamin Reed a.k.a. Ranger Rick ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://ranger.befunk.com/
So now you see handicaps can be cured.  Blind, deaf, dum can all be cured
with this. -- Alex Chiu, Immortality Inventor

___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel



Re: [Fink-devel] FinkCommander now available by CVS at SourceForge

2002-03-21 Thread Max Horn

Seems as if Preferences.nib is missing from CVS, I can't compile it 
without that.


Cheers,

Max
-- 
---
Max Horn
Software Developer

email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
phone: (+49) 6151-494890

___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel



Re: [Fink-devel] FinkCommander now available by CVS at SourceForge

2002-03-21 Thread Max Horn

At 9:33 Uhr -0500 21.03.2002, Benjamin Reed wrote:
Steven Burr [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
  I'd like to make sure I avoid this problem in the future, so I have a
  question for the group.  Once SourceForge support removes the directory
  from the repository, can I safely commit in the future without first
  moving build out of the Project Builder folder? My (obviously limited)
  understanding is that a file or directory not already in a cvs
  repository needs to be put there with the add command before it will
  be included in future commits.

It should be safe to commit... when you update you should get a '?' before
the build directory.  If you want to be more permanent about it, make a
.cvsignore file with only the line:

build

...in it, in the top-level directory, and check that in.  CVS will ignore
that directory from then on, if it exists locally.


There is one caveat, though: your local build directory now has CVS 
subfolders in it. My suggestion is to trash your local build 
directory (this is harmless, and similiar to the effect of Clean 
All. But this is mostly of concern if you also want to use CVS from 
the command line.


Max
-- 
---
Max Horn
Software Developer

email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
phone: (+49) 6151-494890

___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel



Re: [Fink-devel] FinkCommander now available by CVS at SourceForge

2002-03-21 Thread Steven Burr


On Thursday, March 21, 2002, at 07:38 AM, Max Horn wrote:

 Seems as if Preferences.nib is missing from CVS, I can't compile it 
 without that.

Sorry.  I ran into the same problem when I did a test run on my kids' 
Mac and thought I had fixed it.

I think the repository is in good shape now.  I committed the 
Preferences.nib contents, deleted the old version of FC from the other 
Mac and did another test run with anonymous cvs.  FC compiled and ran 
several commands, including selfupdate-cvs.As I write this on my 
iBook, FC is running update-all without any problem (so far).

SourceForge has already removed the build directory.  I took  Finlay's 
advice and selected an alternative local directory for the build and 
build intermediates in PB preferences.

Thanks for all the help.


___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel



Re: [Fink-devel] FinkCommander now available by CVS at SourceForge

2002-03-21 Thread Jeremy Higgs

On 22/3/02 3:47 PM, Steven Burr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 On Thursday, March 21, 2002, at 07:38 AM, Max Horn wrote:
 
 Seems as if Preferences.nib is missing from CVS, I can't compile it
 without that.
 
 Sorry.  I ran into the same problem when I did a test run on my kids'
 Mac and thought I had fixed it.
 
 I think the repository is in good shape now.  I committed the
 Preferences.nib contents, deleted the old version of FC from the other
 Mac and did another test run with anonymous cvs.  FC compiled and ran
 several commands, including selfupdate-cvs.As I write this on my
 iBook, FC is running update-all without any problem (so far).
 
 SourceForge has already removed the build directory.  I took  Finlay's
 advice and selected an alternative local directory for the build and
 build intermediates in PB preferences.
 
 Thanks for all the help.

I had a look at FinkCommander, and it looks very promising!

One suggestion that I have, though... Perhaps when you click on the name of
a package, the program should show the information immediately, instead of
having to go to 'Source - Describe'. This may take some tweaking on Fink's
behalf, though... As it sometimes takes a while for Fink to retrieve the
information.

Perhaps parsing the info returned by 'fink describe package' would also be
useful. Some users probably don't want to view the information in DescPort,
DescPackaging and DescUsage, so maybe there should be an option to somehow
only include the DescDetail field in the bottom pane. (I'm not sure how this
would be done, though... Fink doesn't label the fields in its output...) You
could then have an option somewhere to increase or descrease the amount of
information given for packages (like you can do with dselect... Press 'I'
with a package selected and it will switch between different levels of
information.)

One thing that might also be nice is to display the dependencies of a
package. (Again, not by default... Perhaps on a different 'level'), but as
Fink currently doesn't output this information in 'fink describe', that
would be a bit difficult...

[Turned out to be a bit more than one suggestion... Oh well! :) ]

Hope this helps!

Thanks!


___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel