Re: [Fink-users] Package (arb 20071207-1004) fails
Fixed. -ben On Jan 16, 2008 4:03 PM, Matthew Cottrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have the strangest problem compiling arb on Leopard 10.5.1 (iMac PowerPC G5) with a fresh installation of Fink. Package manager version: 0.27.10 Distribution version: 0.8.1.rsync powerpc arb seems to compile fine, but something breaks at the very end when Fink is wrapping things up. Below is the report that arb compiled okay followed by the error. made 'all' with success. to start arb enter 'arb' + ln -s /sw/bin /sw/share/arb/lib ln: /sw/share/arb/lib: No such file or directory ### execution of /var/tmp/tmp.2.8UaLxP failed, exit code 1 Removing runtime build-lock... Removing build-lock package... /sw/bin/dpkg-lockwait -r fink-buildlock-arb-20071207-1004 (Reading database ... 11559 files and directories currently installed.) Removing fink-buildlock-arb-20071207-1004 ... Failed: phase compiling: arb-20071207-1004 failed -- Matthew Cottrell Lewes, DE 19958 http://web.mac.com/matt.cottrell - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] gnewspost
On Dec 9, 2007 9:51 PM, Martin Costabel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: PM wrote: On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 11:18:36AM -0800, PM wrote: Is gnewspost being maintained? I contacted the package manager a few days ago, but I keep getting this error: I think he is still around, but not very often these days. He does not seem to have updated this package to work on Leopard. Sorry, I still have no 10.5 machine to build stuff with, though probably this month. Anyone is welcome to take over / port / update my packages. thanks, -Ben - SF.Net email is sponsored by: Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] flac-1.1.1-11 problem in stable
Fixed -ben On Feb 24, 2005, at 4:48 PM, Jason J. Park wrote: id3lib4-dev now is in stable, but now I get the following error when performing a fink selfupdate and fink update-all. ... flac-1.1.1/obj/release/bin/Makefile.am flac-1.1.1/obj/release/bin/Makefile.in flac-1.1.1/obj/release/lib/ flac-1.1.1/obj/release/lib/Makefile.am flac-1.1.1/obj/release/lib/Makefile.in sed -e 's,@PREFIX@,/sw,g' /sw/fink/dists/stable/main/finkinfo/sound/flac.patch | patch -p1 patching file ltmain.sh Hunk #1 succeeded at 54 with fuzz 2. Hunk #2 succeeded at 2280 with fuzz 2. patching file configure Hunk #1 succeeded at 5858 (offset 3328 lines). patching file src/plugin_common/canonical_tag.c patch: malformed patch at line 65: ### execution of sed failed, exit code 2 Failed: patching flac-1.1.1-11 failed Package manager version: 0.23.6 Distribution version: 0.7.1.rsync 10.3 Stable branch On Feb 21, 2005, at 6:15 PM, Jason J.Park wrote: After performing a fink selfupdate in the stable branch, I get the following error: Information about 2065 packages read in 1 seconds. The package 'libpng3' will be built and installed. The package 'dillo' will be built and installed. WARNING: The package dillo Depends on gtk+, but gtk+ only allows things to BuildDepend on it. The package 'libpng3-shlibs' will be built and installed. The package 'gmp' will be built and installed. The package 'gmp-shlibs' will be built and installed. The package 'flac' will be built and installed. WARNING: While resolving dependency id3lib4-dev for package flac-1.1.1-11, package id3lib4-dev was not found. Failed: Can't resolve dependency id3lib4-dev for package flac-1.1.1-11 (no matching packages/versions found) flac-1.1.1-11 requires id3lib4-dev which is not in stable yet. Jason Park --- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595alloc_id=14396op=click ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users --- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595alloc_id=14396op=click ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] selfupdate-cvs failure not in FAQ's
What exact fink version do you have? What is the output of: % fink --version Package manager version: 0.23.5.cvs Distribution version: 0.7.1.cvs x-tad-bigger /x-tad-bigger One of the 'binary install' update methods for OS X 10.2 (even though you are on 10.3) listed on: http://fink.sourceforge.net/download/upgrade.php may result in an install which will selfupdate after performing it. However your install is so old that source upgrading may be impossible. -Ben On Feb 11, 2005, at 12:25 PM, Ty Gould wrote: If I change it manually, it flips it back to 10.2, if I leave it 10.2, it stays 10.2.. For the printenv PATH, I get the following: /usr/local/XtalView/bin/unknown:/sw/share/xtal/cns_solve_1.1/mac-ppc-darwin_g77/bin:/sw/share/xtal/cns_solve_1.1/mac-ppc-darwin_g77/utils:/sw/bin:/sw/sbin:/bin:/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/X11R6/bin:/sw/share/xtal/ccp4-4.2.2/etc:/sw/share/xtal/ccp4-4.2.2/bin:/sw/share/xtal/ccp4-4.2.2/ccp4i/bin:.:/usr/local/Xtalview/bin/powerpcDarwin5 On Feb 11, 2005, at 1:10 PM, Alexander K. Hansen wrote: Wait: you mean that flips you back to 10.2, or it sets it to 10.3? The other issue looks like a PATH problem, or a missing /sw/bin/dpkg-deb. What do you get if you run printenv PATH in a terminal window? On Feb 11, 2005, at 1:56 PM, Ty Gould wrote: I tried that, it keeps changing it back to 10.3, it also has the same failure with selfupdate-cvs.. On Feb 11, 2005, at 12:49 PM, Alexander K. Hansen wrote: On Feb 11, 2005, at 12:46 PM, Ty Gould wrote: It says the distribution is 10.2... Ah, that would do it. Change that to 10.3. With luck you can do this via the command detailed in: http://fink.sourceforge.net/faq/usage-fink.php#wrong-tree On Feb 11, 2005, at 11:08 AM, Alexander K. Hansen wrote: On Feb 11, 2005, at 12:03 PM, Ty Gould wrote: I am running 10.3.8 On Feb 11, 2005, at 10:51 AM, Alexander K. Hansen wrote: Then I'm absolutely floored that a selfupdate would attempt to bring you 0.17.1-1. Check the Distribution line in /sw/etc/fink.conf and make sure it says Distribution : 10.3 --A On Feb 11, 2005, at 11:40 AM, Ty Gould wrote: I have read the FAQ's and cannot fix my problem. I get the following error when I try and run selfupdate-cvs: Use of uninitialized value in list assignment at /sw/lib/perl5/Fink/PkgVersion.pm line 1716. rm -f /sw/src/root-fink-0.17.1-1/sw/info/dir /sw/src/root-fink-0.17.1-1/sw/info/dir.old /sw/src/root-fink-0.17.1-1/sw/share/info/dir /sw/src/root-fink-0.17.1-1/sw/share/info/dir.old rm -rf fink-0.17.1-1 Writing control file... Writing package script postinst... dpkg-deb -b root-fink-0.17.1-1 /sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/binary-darwin-powerpc/base Can't exec dpkg-deb: No such file or directory at /sw/lib/perl5/Fink/Services.pm line 216. ### execution of dpkg-deb failed, exit code -1 Failed: can't create package fink_0.17.1-1_darwin-powerpc.deb I tried running the command suggested in the FAQs for dpkg-deb failures: sudo /sw/var/lib/fink/prebound/update-package-prebinding.pl -f but I get a command not found error, and checked and /sw/var/lib/ does not have a fink directory. Can anyone help? Thanks, Ty What OS version are you running? fink-0.17.1-1 isn't even allowed on 10.1, and is older than the latest binary versions for 10.2 and 10.3? ~~ Ty Gould, Ph.D. Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics Texas AM University Mail Stop 2128 College Station, TX 77843-2128 Phone: (979) 862-7639 Fax: (979) 862-7638 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~~ ~~ Ty Gould, Ph.D. Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics Texas AM University Mail Stop 2128 College Station, TX 77843-2128 Phone: (979) 862-7639 Fax: (979) 862-7638 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~~ -- Alexander Hansen Fink Documentarian [Day Job] Levitated Dipole Experiment http://www.psfc.mit.edu/LDX ~~ Ty Gould, Ph.D. Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics Texas AM University Mail Stop 2128 College Station, TX 77843-2128 Phone: (979) 862-7639 Fax: (979) 862-7638 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~~
[Fink-users] Re: Installing flac-nox-1.1.1-10: Patch Fails
You don't need to email the list at all, only the maintainer is necessary. -Ben On Nov 7, 2004, at 1:25 AM, Emily Jackson wrote: The patch accompanying the new flac-nox package fails: sed -e 's,@PREFIX@,/sw,g' /sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/finkinfo/sound/ flac-nox.patch | patch -p1 missing header for unified diff at line 4 of patch can't find file to patch at input line 4 Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option? The text leading up to this was: -- |#this first patch fixes: |#libtool-disable-static: line 3664: Mach-O dynamically linked shared library: command not found | -- [Package maintainer CC'ed] Thanks, Emily --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5588alloc_id=12065op=click ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] Re: no sound with new esound :-(
On Sep 10, 2004, at 12:47 PM, Ralf Höling wrote: Hi all! Am 08.09.2004 um 22:23 schrieb Mattia Vaccari: well, yes, I've run into _exactly_ (hence no error message pasting) the same problem with xmms after updating esound! I recompiled everything from sources but this didn't seem to help. Is there a way to downgrade? I tried fink install esound-0.2.34-6 but that didn't work. Fixed in rev -8. Run selfupdate. -Ben --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. Deadline: Sept. 13. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] Request to upgrade unstable Gramps version
I'm in england, so i'll have to try to update it over ssh/vnc. -Ben On Jul 9, 2004, at 11:25 AM, Timothy Gregg wrote: On Jul 8, 2004, at 2:46 PM, Alexander K. Hansen wrote: It's completely appropriate to ask to increment a package to a newer upstream version. Sometimes the patches work between version numbers, and sometimes not, I guess this one doesn't, but I don't claim to understand the patch process in general. The output I get goes like this: /Users/tmgreggfink rebuild gramps /usr/bin/sudo /sw/bin/fink rebuild gramps Information about 1726 packages read in 0 seconds. The following package will be rebuilt: gramps gzip -dc /sw/src/gramps-1.0.4.tar.gz | /sw/bin/tar -xf - --no-same-owner --no-same-permissions perl -pi -e 's|imp.find_module|#imp.find_module|g' configure sed 's|@PREFIX@|/sw|g' /sw/fink/dists/local/main/finkinfo/gramps.patch | patch -p1 patching file configure Hunk #1 succeeded at 3278 (offset 183 lines). Hunk #2 succeeded at 3416 (offset 183 lines). patching file src/Makefile.in Hunk #1 FAILED at 106. 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file src/Makefile.in.rej patching file src/po/Makefile.in Hunk #1 succeeded at 312 (offset 69 lines). ### execution of sed failed, exit code 1 Failed: patching gramps-1.0.4-12 failed so you'd probably need to provide specific problems (like the .rej file) I find the following in the /src directory after the failure: /sw/src/gramps-1.0.4-12/gramps-1.0.4/srcmore Makefile.in.rej *** *** 106,112 SUBDIRS = docgen filters plugins data po calendars # For intl. support, how do we compile? - CFLAGS = -fPIC -shared -O @GNOMEINC@ @CFLAGS@ @CPPFLAGS@ [EMAIL PROTECTED]@ LDFLAGS = @GNOMELIB@ @LDFLAGS@ [EMAIL PROTECTED]@ @LIBS@ CLEANFILES = grampslib.so MOSTLYCLEANFILES = --- 106,112 SUBDIRS = docgen filters plugins data po calendars # For intl. support, how do we compile? + CFLAGS = -bundle -undefined dynamic_lookup -O @GNOMEINC@ @CFLAGS@ @CPPFLAGS@ [EMAIL PROTECTED]@ LDFLAGS = @GNOMELIB@ @LDFLAGS@ [EMAIL PROTECTED]@ @LIBS@ CLEANFILES = grampslib.so MOSTLYCLEANFILES = FWIW, gramp-1.0.3 worked fine, so the dependencies should all be fine. OSX10.3.4, 640 MB Ti400 I also tried building outside of Fink, but I don't know how to tell it to find some specific gnome-python stuff in /sw (followed the FAQ8.3). Thanks for any help, Tim On Jul 8, 2004, at 1:36 PM, Timothy Gregg wrote: I wanted to use the latest Gramps bug fix version since I encountered one of the bugs in version 1.0.3 that was suppsedly fixed for 1.0.4. I have tried to spoof fink into using the 1.0.4 sources, but could not get the patch process to work after just changing the version number and MD5 in the .info file. Any specific suggestions on how to do this? Or is it inappropriate to ask if the unstable gramps could be incremented to 1.0.4? Thanks, Tim Gregg -- Alexander Hansen Fink Documentarian [Day Job] Levitated Dipole Experiment http://www.psfc.mit.edu/LDX --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=4721alloc_id=10040op=click ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] can't install gramps
On Jun 2, 2004, at 7:55 AM, Alexander K. Hansen wrote: That's because nautilus-shlibs is only available in the unstable tree (which is why a binary isn't available). By rights, gnome-python2-py23 and therefore gramps should not be available in stable either, because of this. Anyway, you'll need to look at http://fink.sourceforge.net/faq/usage-fink.php?phpLang=en#unstable Yep. Actually was given clearance to move the other gnome2 packages to stable but have not had time, if anyone feels like moving nautilus (and all its deps!) over to stable feel free -Ben --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the new InstallShield X. From Windows to Linux, servers to mobile, InstallShield X is the one installation-authoring solution that does it all. Learn more and evaluate today! http://www.installshield.com/Dev2Dev/0504 ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] db3 does not install
On Apr 23, 2004, at 11:07 AM, Alexander K. Hansen wrote: On Apr 23, 2004, at 1:58 PM, Guy Lauquin wrote: [chamaerops:/sw/fink] guy% sudo ln -s /sw/fink/dists/stable/main/binary-darwin-powerpc/libs/db3_3.3.11 -24_darwin-powerpc.deb /sw/fink/debs/db3_3.3.11-24_darwin-powerpc.deb Password: ln: /sw/fink/debs/db3_3.3.11-24_darwin-powerpc.deb: File exists Both seem to behave correctly--what that can't symlink package message means isn't obvious. The only other thing that I can think of is to check the permissions of /sw/fink/debs/db3_3.3.11-24_darwin-powerpc.deb. I figured this out, it is a bug in fink, not a permissions error. It happens if you build the same version of a package in one tree, build it in a another tree, then try to build again in the first tree. To work around it, remove the new destination deb file (not the source link) sudo rm /sw/fink/dists/stable/main/binary-darwin-powerpc/libs/db3_3.3.11 -24_darwin-powerpc.deb Another way to repro the bug: fink build cmine sudo rm /sw/fink/debs/cmine_0.0-12_darwin-powerpc.deb sudo ln -s /bah.deb /sw/fink/debs/cmine_0.0-12_darwin-powerpc.deb fink rebuild cmine Result: Failed: can't symlink package cmine_0.0-12_darwin-powerpc.deb into pool directory: File exists -Ben --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by Sleepycat Software Learn developer strategies Cisco, Motorola, Ericsson Lucent use to deliver higher performing products faster, at low TCO. http://www.sleepycat.com/telcomwpreg.php?From=osdnemail3 ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] Failed updating gramps to 1.0.3-11
On Apr 27, 2004, at 11:41 AM, Remi Mommsen wrote: I tried to upgrade gramps to the current version 1.0.3-11. However, it fails due to an include file it doesn't find. I paste a part of configure, too, as there are some 'command not found'. I don't know if they are relevant: checking for pkg-config... NO ../configure: line 1: pkg-config: command not found ../configure: line 1: pkg-config: command not foundSNIP gcc -bundle -undefined dynamic_lookup -O -g -O2 -I/sw/include -I/sw/include -I/sw/include/python2.3 -o grampslib.so ../grampslib_wrap.c -L/sw/lib -L/sw/lib I added a builddep on pkgconfig, and a whole bunch of gnome stuff it needs now, try it. -Ben --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149alloc_id=8166op=click ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] FinkCommander v. 0.5.3 Released
The cvs sources should build 0.5.3 unless i forgot to check something in which is possible. Yes i never tagged 0.5.2, oh well. IMO, providing CVS is enough. For open source principles, fine, but I don't see why one would want to use the finkcommander source tgz to install it. Anyway, I didn't realize people cared so much, since you do, we can post em. Would you like to be the FC releasemeister? I like coding and updating it and such but making releases is just a big hassle. FC in general needs more help, since you know its just me now. I'm not sure what you mean by the Fink community not spending the resources to help FinkCommander, or what resources it might be lacking. :) (I do think more people should be using FC though, at least as a nice convenient package list GUI... no need to use it for installing or building) You don't need to quote licenses at me. The GPL is satisfied if i am willing to MAIL you a CD of the sources, UPON YOUR REQUEST, including my costs. That also fully satisfies the 'principles' of open source. I don't even have to post the source for download at all. But anyway, all i did was ask why. I didn't think anyone actually cared. -Ben On Apr 19, 2004, at 11:48 PM, Martin Costabel wrote: In this case, even the cvs repository doesn't seem to be up to date. The cvs sources build version 0.5.2. And If you want to check out the sources for 0.5.2, you are lost, too: There is no 0.5.2 tag. So I honestly don't know from what sources this version of FinkCommander was built. I am pretty sure there used to be a 0.5.2 tarball on sourceforge for a while, but this seems to have disappeared, too. --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470alloc_id=3638op=click ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] FinkCommander v. 0.5.3 Released
Why? -Ben On Apr 18, 2004, at 11:34 PM, Martin Costabel wrote: Ben Hines wrote: Version 0.5.3 of FinkCommander has been released. This version is a bug-fix release, which fixes the bug added in 0.5.2 where all packages showed as stable. Hi Ben, would it be too much to ask to put a source tarball on the finkcommander sourceforge site, as it used to be until 0.5.1? -- Martin --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470alloc_id=3638op=click ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
[Fink-users] FinkCommander v. 0.5.3 Released
x-tad-biggerVersion 0.5.3 of FinkCommander has been released. This version is a bug-fix release, which fixes the bug added in 0.5.2 where all packages showed as stable. /x-tad-biggerx-tad-biggerhttp://finkcommander.sourceforge.net/history//x-tad-biggerx-tad-bigger FinkCommander is a graphical user interface for the Fink software packaging system for Mac OS X. It provides an intuitive front-end to the Fink command-line tools for downloading and installing Unix software./x-tad-bigger
Re: [Fink-users] new clamav release (was: Question about installing clamav)
On Mar 26, 2004, at 2:51 PM, Remi Mommsen wrote: Hi, On Mar 26, 2004, at 2:33 PM, Phil Ershler wrote: I e-mailed the maintainer for clamav, asking about the possibilities of updating clamav to the latest release. I did not receive a reply. Is there a possibility of updating to the new release? I've done the same about 2 weeks ago. I sent him an updated info file, but haven't heard anything back (cc'd the maintainer Carsten Klapp). My current version has still some rough edges due to change in the way the virus database is handled. I'll try to fix it over the weekend and submit an updated version. He previously asked that anyone who wants please take over his packages. So please, take it over.. -Ben --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470alloc_id=3638op=click ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] cloning fink installation to another machine?
I believe we have fixed that problem a while back. Should work with fink 0.18.0. -Ben On Jan 11, 2004, at 2:02 PM, John Hurst wrote: G'day Mike, One caveat: just make sure you use the 'proper' rsync, and not the hfs version. I screwed my /sw up by (inadvertently) using the hfs version (duh). --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software. Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms. Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] Warning prebinding not disabled
On Dec 31, 2003, at 4:45 AM, Martin Costabel wrote: Michèle Garoche wrote: [] Are those warnings normal? Yes, it appears so. At first, I found them not very logical - they shouldn't say because, but although - but apparently you have to read them as prebinding not (disabled because of foo). In any case, they are not useful to anyone except possibly the maintainer of the fink prebinding system. The cause of the warnings is fixed later by the fink prebinding system. It is also possible to set the address at link time and avoid the error, but that would require modifying every single package in fink. -Ben --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id78alloc_id371op=click ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] g77: why 3.4 ?
On Dec 31, 2003, at 1:43 AM, Michel Peyrard wrote: I have having some difficulties compiling the plplot package and I noticed that g77 provided by fink is 3.4 while gcc of the Apple Developer tools is 3.3. There seems to be some inconsistency that could explain my problem. You need to start with what the actual problem is, not what possible solutions might be... what is the problem? Post your installed versions, package version, os version, fink version, error output, etc etc... -Ben --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278alloc_id=3371op=click ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] Broken libnet-pm dependency
On Dec 30, 2003, at 1:43 PM, Martin Costabel wrote: William Hunter wrote: [] dpkg: error processing /sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/binary-darwin-powerpc/libs/perlmods/ libnet-pm58 1_1.17-10_darwin-powerpc.deb (--install): trying to overwrite `/sw/share/man/man3/Net::Cmd.3pm', which is also in package libnet-pm Remove the old libnet-pm first (fink remove or, if this fails because of dependency problems, sudo dpkg -r --force-depends) These can be easily fixed by the maintainer. Its been broken in fink since thesin modified all the perlmod packages. -Ben --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278alloc_id=3371op=click ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] date-manip-pm581 -can't install, so can't do update-all
On Dec 31, 2003, at 4:48 AM, Martin Costabel wrote: Roberto Manuel Latorre wrote: [] dpkg: error processing /sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/binary-darwin-powerpc/libs/perlmods/ date-manip-pm581_5.42a-10_darwin-powerpc.deb (--install): trying to overwrite `/sw/share/man/man3/Date::Manip.3pm', which is also in package date-manip-pm You have to remove the old version of date-manip-pm first (fink remove date-manip-pm, and in case this does not work because of dependency problems, sudo dpkg -r --force-depends date-manip-pm). Then continue installing whatever you were installing when this happened. These can be easily fixed by the maintainer, such silly measures should not be needed. They have been broken in fink (for weeks) since thesin modified his perlmod packages. -Ben --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278alloc_id=3371op=click ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] Bonobo-activation fails to compile
On Dec 30, 2003, at 9:35 AM, Michèle Garoche wrote: Le 30 déc. 2003, à 18:23, Martin Costabel a écrit : Michèle Garoche wrote: [] bonobo-activation-fork-server.c: In function `bonobo_activation_server_by_forking': bonobo-activation-fork-server.c:289: error: `LincWatch' undeclared [] Failed: compiling bonobo-activation2-1.0.3-22 failed This has come up already two weeks ago. No solution has been proposed AFAICT. Maybe ask the maintainer? Thanks, Martin, I'll ask him. I don't think the maintainer cares. You're generally lucky to get any response from him at all. It has been broken much longer than 2 weeks - actually it has been broken since november 7, i have no idea how thesin compiled it at all. (bbraun also compiled it, i ended up using the unofficial bindist to install it) Anyway I went ahead and fixed it, builds now. -Ben --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id78alloc_id371op=click ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] fink doesnt recognize installed binary packages
The binary distro is simply behind the source distro. This basically always the case. No more information is needed. One day we will add to fink the ability to hold packages at a certain revision, stick to binary packages via 'fink' command, etc, but not yet. -Ben On Dec 28, 2003, at 9:58 AM, Remi Mommsen wrote: Hi Frank, fink does recognise your installed packages, otherwise it wouldn't show you (i) in front of them. (i) means installed, thought a newer version is available mostly from sources. I guess that you miss some split-offs of these packages, but we need more information from you. What is the output of 'fink install nicotine'? What gives 'fink list atk gtk+2'? Cheers, Remi On Dec 28, 2003, at 3:24 AM, Frank Hoffsümmer wrote: Hello fink-users, I checked the docs, the FAQ and the mailing-list archive, but I couldn't find a solution to my problem. System is Mac OS X 10.3.2 with fink 0.17.1, XTools 1.1 and Apple X11 when I try to install a package from a custom-made .info file, fink doesn't recognize already installed binary packages that I installed with apt-get. I tried fink index etc. I am installing nicotine with custom made nicotine.info file (http://captnswing.net/howto/nicotine/nicotine-1.0.6.info) Now: fink list -i shows me atk and gtk+2 packages with (i) (I installed them before with apt-get) but when I run fink install nicotine then fink still wants to install atk and gtk+2 from sources I doesnt seem to recognize the already installed packages. What is missing? thanks a lot for any insight -frank --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278alloc_id=3371op=click ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users - What're quantum mechanics? I don't know. People who repair quantums I suppose. (Rincewind, Terry Pratchett Eric) * Remigius K. Mommsen e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] University of California, Irvine URL:http://cern.ch/mommsen c/o SLAC voice:++1 (650) 926-3595 2575 Sand Hill Road #35fax:++1 (650) 926-3882 Menlo Park, CA 94025, US home:++1 (650) 233-9041 * --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id78alloc_id371op=click ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id78alloc_id371op=click ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] Re: [Fink-devel] fink-mirrors breaks selfupdate
Try installing it with dpkg. sudo dpkg -i /sw/fink/debs/fink_0.17.1-1_darwin-powerpc.deb I must say i wish someone would have tested updating before making such a basic change to fink. -Ben On Dec 25, 2003, at 8:30 PM, Avram Dorfman wrote: The fix recipe below does not work for me either. Somebody wrote to the developer list and said something about using ./inject.pl to make it work; can somebody explain what he was talking about? For me, the first step of the recipe itself fails for the same reason that fink is failing in the first place: Spinnaker% sudo fink install fink-0.17.1-1 Password: Information about 2183 packages read in 7 seconds. The following package will be installed or updated: fink Failed: No mirror site list file found for mirror 'master'. Thanks, Avram On 12/25/03 12:34 PM, Joseph C. Slater [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So how does one update fink now? From an earlier email: On 12/24/03 12:03 PM, Martin Costabel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I just wrote to the fink-devel with a recipe how to get out of this. In most cases, the following should work: fink install fink-0.17.1-1 fink fetch fink-mirrors fink install fink-mirrors -- --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278alloc_id=3371op=click ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278alloc_id=3371op=click ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] minicom question
This should be fixed now, i updated it to 2.1 and removed an outdated getopt patch which was causing the problem i suspect. -Ben On Dec 18, 2003, at 6:30 AM, Bart Silverstrim wrote: I *know* it was working at one point...but that was back when I was running 10.2. I didn't think to try it right away after a clean install of 10.3, so I just found out that it wasn't working now :-( I can't seem to find any error logs about it either. -Bart On Dec 18, 2003, at 9:16 AM, Alexander K.Hansen wrote: I tried it and saw the same behavior with the switches. -- Alexander Hansen Levitated Dipole Experiment http://www.psfc.mit.edu/LDX On Dec 18, 2003, at 8:30 AM, Bart Silverstrim wrote: I think I saw this question go out before but I couldn't find anyone who answered it...? I have minicom installed, but I can't get it to run with any switches. If I try sudo minicom -o or sudo minicom -s it just sits at the command prompt; I can type things, and characters are echoed back, but I'm still in the shell, as if minicom is hanging. I control-c to get the prompt back. If I do a sudo minicom or a sudo bash then minicom, I get the minicom interface. I manually edited the /sw/etc/minirc.dfl file to reflect the right port (the keyspan USB adapter port) and it will now talk to the cisco equipment but it's still annoying since by default it's trying to reset the modem when it starts up :-/ Thusfar I haven't had the Cisco try to interpret the commands as something legit, but...well... I did a fink rebuild minicom and the behavior persists. The current system is a G3 powerbook 800 mhz, Panther 10.3.2 (although it did it with 10.3.1 too). Fink -V yields a Package manager version: 0.17.1 Distribution version: 0.6.2.cvs I update via rsync. any hints/solutions/etc.? Thanks! -Bart Silverstrim --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278alloc_id=3371op=click ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278alloc_id=3371op=click ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278alloc_id=3371op=click ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] Fwd: Bug #26567 [Opn-Bgs]: ld: Undefined symbols using --with-pspell=/sw
Somehow the -laspell is not getting into the link line. First just try what it says here: http://fink.sourceforge.net/faq/usage-general.php#compile-myself If that doesn't work, come back. -Ben On Dec 10, 2003, at 11:26 AM, GoochRules! wrote: Does here anyone have any ideas about this? It seems like a simple error, I hope its not just my system. Begin forwarded message: From: PHP Bug Database [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: December 09, 2003 16:14:25 MST To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Bug #26567 [Opn-Bgs]: ld: Undefined symbols using --with-pspell=/sw ATTENTION! Do NOT reply to this email! To reply, use the web interface found at http://bugs.php.net/?id=26567edit=2 ID: 26567 Updated by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reported By: goose23 at spu dot edu -Status: Open +Status: Bogus Bug Type: Compile Failure Operating System: Mac OS X PHP Version: 4CVS-2003-12-9 New Comment: Apparently your installation of aspell is broken. (thanks to the aspell author who has been unable to decide whether it should be called aspell, pspell or aspell..) See: http://aspell.sourceforge.net/dist.txt The compile works fine with RH9 aspell rpms. So I suggest you contact the person who packaged aspell for macosx to fix the package.. Previous Comments: -- -- [2003-12-09 16:39:59] goose23 at spu dot edu Description: I am attempting to build php on Mac OS X 10.3 with pspell enabled. I have aspell 0.50.2-10 installed via fink (package manager version 0.17.1, distribution version 0.6.2.cvs). This is my configure script: ./configure --with-apxs --with-pspell=/sw I get these undefined symbols during make: ld: Undefined symbols: _aspell_config_replace _aspell_error_message _aspell_error_number _aspell_speller_add_to_personal _aspell_speller_add_to_session _aspell_speller_check _aspell_speller_clear_session _aspell_speller_error_message _aspell_speller_error_number _aspell_speller_save_all_word_lists _aspell_speller_store_replacement _aspell_speller_suggest _aspell_string_enumeration_next _aspell_word_list_elements _delete_aspell_config _delete_aspell_speller _delete_aspell_string_enumeration _new_aspell_config _new_aspell_speller _to_aspell_speller make: *** [libs/libphp4.bundle] Error 1 If I add '-laspell -laspell-common -lstdc++' to 'EXTRA_LIBS' in the Makefile, make succeeds. I have tried this on php-4.3.4 and php4-STABLE-200312092030, with the same results. -- -- --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278alloc_id=3371op=click ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] Open GL libs cannot be found
For fox looks like you just need --with-opengl=opengl There is a fink package in the 10.2-gcc3.3 tree. I'll move it over to 10.3 tree. -Ben On Dec 17, 2003, at 6:20 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote: It's probably not a Fink problem. You may have to tell the package's configure script where the directory is, e.g. ./configure --with-GL=/usr/X11R6/include/GL. If you run ./configure --help there usually is a list of all of the options you can feed in to the configuration by hand. -- Alexander K. Hansen Levitated Dipole Experiment http://www.psfc.mit.edu/LDX On Dec 17, 2003, at 1:45 AM, Carl Youngblood wrote: This may or may not be a fink problem. I'm trying to compile the Fox GUI toolkit from source (this is not a fink package, just a tarball). It has a -lGL link directive in the makefile for linking in the opengl libs. But it gets an error trying to find the right directory, even though the opengl stuff is in /usr/X11R6/include/GL. I just reinstalled fink (following the directions in the FAQ) and this time I used Apple's X11. Does anyone know how I can make these autoconf scripts know where the GL stuff is? Thanks, Carl Youngblood --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278alloc_id=3371op=click ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278alloc_id=3371op=click ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] mutt failed on 10.3
On Dec 16, 2003, at 10:26 PM, Martin Costabel wrote: We were not talking about installed files, but about files avialable for installation. Also we do have to also trust dpkg's 'body count' if it says there is a later version of a package which is already installed (even partial)... it is fully possible that a user could have dpkg or apt-get installed a higher version of a package from a binary, which is no longer available to be installed. Fink really has nothing to install when you tell it to. Fink will install a .deb binary if it is already-built when a user does fink install, for example. However in this case, there is no deb for the package, and there is no info file. In that case, fink can currently do nothing at all - in the future it could look in the apt-get repository, but it would not have found it there either. When a package is only in the dpkg status file and not fink's package index it is marked as a 'dummy' entry. (see Package.pm ~355). dummy entries generate the 'no package description available' error if they don't have a deb/info and you try to build or install them. I don't know if there is a way for fink to tell that a dummy package only has config files left in the dpkg status db and isn't really installed. Perhaps fink could search for 'older' versions of the same package, as in this case, and ask if you would like to install that one instead, since the new one no longer exists. But it is also possible there are no older versions around either. Fink would also have to ask if you want to nuke your old config files. What if, for exaample, the latest mutt version in 10.2/unstable would not build on 10.3, and one would be forced to keep a lower version number in 10.3 at least for a while? From what i can tell dpkg is really not set up at all to handle going backwards in version numbers at all. 'switching distributions' like this does not really happen in debian. I suspect correct fix would be to add an epoch to the lower version number in the 10.3 tree so it can be 'upgraded' to. I don't think we have any cases like this though. -Ben --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278alloc_id=3371op=click ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] mutt failed on 10.3
On Dec 16, 2003, at 12:04 AM, Martin Costabel wrote: Except that in the case at hand mutt was not installed at all. Only its config files were left, beause it was not purged. I would consider this at least counter-intuitive behaviour (not to say bug) that fink in this case refuses to install (and doesn't tell why), because it takes its information about what version is the latest available one from some body count in dpkg's database and not from its own. dpkg's database is the only database of installed files. Fink does not keep one. (nor could it, currently) Fink's own database only tracks info files (for source building). Fink can't know what is installed without trusting dpkg because users can install via apt-get or dpkg directly. We do a 'fink purge' command for purging configuration files.. -Ben --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278alloc_id=3371op=click ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] mutt failed on 10.3
On Dec 16, 2003, at 10:26 PM, Martin Costabel wrote: you get the impression that something is not right, whatever the interior mechanism is. You always ask why does it try to install version x.y-z when it damn well knows that this doesn't exist? I agree with you dude. Did I argue against this? I was simply correcting your (seeming) misunderstandings and FUD about what fink is capable of. We have to rely on dpkg's database, we have no choice in the current fink design. -Ben --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278alloc_id=3371op=click ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] mutt failed on 10.3
On Dec 8, 2003, at 1:16 PM, Claus Atzenbeck wrote: On Mon, 8 Dec 2003, Martin Costabel wrote: No idea, sorry. But you can try to do fink install mutt-1.4i-21 to force the installation of the new version. I did fink purge mutt. This has solved the problem. Don't ask me why, but after that fink install mutt is now compiling the version from the 10.3 tree. Actually, the 10.3 tree version is older, not newer. By fink installing 1.4i-21 you went backwards, not forwards. This happened because drm synced 10.2/stable to 10.3/unstable as the first move which caused the info files for people's installed packages to no longer exist. I'll move mutt 1.4.1 to 10.3/unstable. -Ben --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] update-all fails for aspell
As far as i can tell, the dictionaries DON'T depend on the shlibs OR builddepend on the -dev. They appear to build and work fine just depending on aspell, which depends on its shlibs and dev. The shlibs and dev are for third-party apps that embed aspell. -Ben On Dec 8, 2003, at 11:04 AM, Michèle Garoche wrote: Depends: aspell (= 0.50.4.1), aspell-shlibs BuildDepends: aspell-dev (= 0.50.4.1) CompileScript: ./configure InstallScript: make install DESTDIR=%d .. Change version, Depends, BuildDepends --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] sdl-mixer on panther
Run fink selfupdate. Current is 1.2.5-12 in the 10.3 tree. I just put it in stable as well. -Ben On Dec 8, 2003, at 3:38 PM, GoochRules! wrote: Failed: compiling sdl-mixer-1.2.5-11 failed --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] Gramps
On Nov 25, 2003, at 8:51 PM, Daniel Macks wrote: Okay, so you've got python2.2 and pygtk2-py22 installed. From a terminal window, what's the output of 'fink list pygtk' (without the quotes)? There may be some weird interactions if more than one version of pygtk is installed concurrently. gramps 0.9.5 compiles and runs fine on 10.3. It is in the unstable tree. I can't move the python policy compliant 0.9.5 gramps into stable until its Deps are moved. Most of the python stuff in stable is the old, broken, non version dependent format, which would explain his problem well. We need to remove all the non python policy compliant packages out of stable and replace them with their updates. (ie, ger rid of gnome-python for -py23, get rid of pygtk2 for its -py23 and -py22, etc... They aren't stable, really. -Ben --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] Fink/OSX interactions
On Nov 19, 2003, at 1:18 PM, Nolan J. Darilek wrote: I've done a fink selfupdate recently, and the behavior began again. My powerbook now prompts for a login and password when booted. Before, the situation was very cut-n-dry, as I'd installed This has nothing to do with fink and could not have anything to do with fink. Something else is causing it. System Preferences - Accounts - Login Options check Automatically Log In checkbox. -Ben --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] fink and giFT
Those instructions are out of date. Just 'fink install gift'. -Ben On Oct 20, 2003, at 7:22 AM, Susheel Daswani wrote: Hi Fink Users! Has anyone successfully compiled giFT on OS X with some support from Fink? I found a website that details the process: http://www.gottsilla.net/gift/ . Unfortunately the 'make' fails - the libtool command isn't happy. Any idea what is going on? --- This SF.net email is sponsored by OSDN developer relations Here's your chance to show off your extensive product knowledge We want to know what you know. Tell us and you have a chance to win $100 http://www.zoomerang.com/survey.zgi?HRPT1X3RYQNC5V4MLNSV3E54 ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] rmail and postfix
Uh, why the hell would we do that? It works fine. We have plenty of unmaintained packages. No reason to remove a perfectly working and popular package which might be missing some obscure rmail script. The postfix maintainer posted in july that he would update the package. I haven't heard otherwise from him. http://sourceforge.net/tracker/ ?group_id=17203atid=414256func=detailaid=743083 -Ben On Tuesday, September 2, 2003, at 12:11 PM, Philip Ershler wrote: I feel badly, but I don't have the time or the expertise to become a fink maintainer. In my opinion, Postfix should just be pulled from Fink, unless someone else can take care of it. Phil --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] porting question: darwin ld, how to handle GNU ld options
I'd suggest [EMAIL PROTECTED] list for this, or at the very least, fink-devel. But to answer - no. You will probably need to actually port the code. What package, why does it need these things? -Ben On Friday, September 5, 2003, at 03:16 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote: I have a package that uses several GNU ld options (--defsym, --start-group, --end-group etc.) and the apple linkder doesn't take these options. What's the usual methond to fix this? Does GNU ld exist for darwin? Or, is there a wrapper that can interpret GNU-style options? Thanks, Kevin Hilman Seattle, WA --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] master ftp problem...
On Thursday, August 28, 2003, at 10:02 AM, Viv Kendon wrote: On Thu, 28 Aug 2003, Martin Costabel wrote: master:master:master:master..., huh? This seems to have been the same problem. The thread doesn't offer a clear explanation of this phenomenon, but fink (the package) was changed on 13 June because of this. What version of fink do you have? The change would have been between 0.13.2 and 0.13.3. This bug has always been there since I implemented the mirroring stuff. I fixed at least one occurrence of it, but I think it still exists, i heard one report of it a while back and haven't changed anything after that. Probably some error in my hackish newbie perl code. :) Unfortunately the master mirror concept doesn't work, because our (one) master mirror doesn't actually update on any kind of reasonable schedule. I'd hoped for hourly, it 'tries' to do it daily, and we really get 'a few times a month'. -Ben --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] move it or lose it?
On Monday, August 25, 2003, at 04:17 PM, Jens Nockel wrote: packages will survive this. For example, scientific programs like R, Numeric Python, octave etc. may be compiled with ATLAS or Altivec support. 1. Those are about the only packages which do that (generally, fink packages do not and are not supposed to) 2. I doubt he uses many scientific packages working in the Department of Art at CSUSB :) -Ben --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] problems building kde programs
_Sm* is all from libSM, part of xfree86. What versions of xfree86 do you have installed? Apple's? Fink's? -Ben On Tuesday, August 12, 2003, at 08:28 PM, Kurt Fleschner wrote: Now, I'm stumped on whats causing all this to not build. Anyone have any ideas on how to fix this? Thanks. --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa0013ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] libffi for darwin/os x?
On Sunday, August 10, 2003, at 01:56 AM, Asko Kauppi wrote: I was surprised to see that 'libffi' (foreign function interface) is not available as a fink module. Is there a reason for this, or just that no-one's needed / had the time to port it? Fink just includes what people care to contribute, we don't (usually) go down a list of software and port it. Currently, libffi is part of the gcc development tree, and pretty stable. Darwin/osx port exists, so it's just a matter of packaging. Most people (like me) won't need the full gcc suite... We do have a request tracker: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?atid=371315group_id=17203 or you can try it yourself: http://fink.sourceforge.net/doc/packaging/index.php -Ben --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa0013ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] can't make fink believe stuff needs to be updated
On Friday, July 11, 2003, at 10:34 AM, Geoff Smith wrote: I have fink installed, but only version 0.12.1-1, or 0.5.2 (not really sure about the numbering scheme). The results of a fink selfupdate follow: This was a known bug in fink 0.12.1. See http://fink.sourceforge.net/download/fix-upgrade.php which contains the fix. However i admit that it is not easy or obvious to find. the exact error should possibly be put in the FAQ or upgrade matrix with the fix. Currently it is only linked to on http://fink.sourceforge.net/download/upgrade.php -Ben --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Parasoft Error proof Web apps, automate testing more. Download eval WebKing and get a free book. www.parasoft.com/bulletproofapps1 ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] gnotime compile failing: used from dynamic library....not from earlier dynamic library
On Wednesday, July 9, 2003, at 08:05 AM, Mark Stosberg wrote: nt. So here's why I'm stuck compiling it. I'm gettin a whole slew of errors like this: # symbol _Load_Device used from dynamic library /sw/lib/libpangoxft-1.0.dylib(ftxopen.lo) not from earlier dynamic library /sw/lib/libpangoft2-1.0.0.dylib(ftxopen.lo) ### That is not the error, that is just a warning. The error is elsewhere. (also, this would be better on fink-devel) -Ben --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Parasoft Error proof Web apps, automate testing more. Download eval WebKing and get a free book. www.parasoft.com/bulletproofapps1 ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] will fink purge remove its changes made to Netinfo after an install of passwd?
On Saturday, July 12, 2003, at 05:20 AM, Alexander K. Hansen wrote: You wouldn't be able to remove passwd until you remove everything else, since it's a base package. I'm not sure if fink purge takes out the daemon users, but it should, by rights. base packages CAN be removed. Only 'Essential' packages can't be removed, and not all 'base' are 'essential'. However, as drm stated, the passwd users never are removed. Currently, passwd can't be made optional due to various issues. It is all-or-none, and some packages won't work without their users. Also, users can mix binary and source installs, creating further issues. An enhanced passwd which only installs the needed users (ie, you only get user postfix if you need postfix) is planned, perhaps i will make that my next project, though it is tricky and won't satisfy everyone. -Ben --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Parasoft Error proof Web apps, automate testing more. Download eval WebKing and get a free book. www.parasoft.com/bulletproofapps1 ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
[Fink-users] Re: [Fink-devel] g77 error
We should add these fixes to our autoconf packages and ALL broken fortran packages. It is legitimate to file bugs on all of them, since they do not work and it is fixable. -Ben On Friday, July 11, 2003, at 10:46 AM, jfm wrote: On Friday, Jul 11, 2003, at 18:58 Europe/Brussels, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is an error I have gotten with either g77 3.1 or 3.3 if you upgrade to the developer tools patch that installs gcc 3.3. The only way I was able to get rid of this problem was to reinstall the December 2002 edition of the developer tools. Merely switching back to gcc 3.1 did not get rid of this problem. I tried reporting it before but ... A slightly longer way ... : 1) in autoconf2.5, add the line PatchScript: sed -i -r 's|^(\ *)(end]\))|\1call\ exit\n\1\2|g' lib/autoconf/fortran.m4 (and do a similar patch for extutils-f77 for a couple of perl-modules : in F77.pm, add a line print OUT call exit\n; right after the line : print OUT print *, 'Hello World'\n; ) 2) After rebuilding those 2, the configure stage in other builds should proceed normally, provided you add, if necessary, in a PatchScript to run autoconf (or autoreconf (-f)) , and, if necessary, fix, before running autoconf, the .m4 files in the builddir. Thus, eg, PatchScript: sed -i -r 's|^(\ *)end$|\1call\ exit\n\1end|g' *.m4 m4/R.m4 autoconf 3) As to the make proper, the following line is safe to add in the PatchScript, and will as far as I know correct the problems in the sources : egrep -r '^\ *(STOP|stop)$' *|grep '\.f:'|cut -f1 -d':'|xargs sed -i -r 's,^\ *(STOP|stop)$,\ 999,g' Best, JF Mertens --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Parasoft Error proof Web apps, automate testing more. Download eval WebKing and get a free book. www.parasoft.com/bulletproofapps1 ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Parasoft Error proof Web apps, automate testing more. Download eval WebKing and get a free book. www.parasoft.com/bulletproofapps1 ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] Installing Debian packages on Fink?
On Saturday, June 28, 2003, at 01:16 AM, Jonas Steverud wrote: Something that struk me yesterday was that in Debian there are a lot of packages that doesn't contain any binaries, like the ispell dictionaries, and it would be nice if those where available in fink too. My question now is how much work is it to port these non-binary packages to Fink in general? Check out the fink packaging manual on the web site, and the .info files in fink, for example: /sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/finkinfo/text/ispell-french-1.0-1.info You could easily make a small package to install these. (and submit them to us to include in fink, if you want) -Ben --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa0016ave/direct;at.asp_061203_01/01 ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] Need help installing gnupg
On Tuesday, June 24, 2003, at 01:34 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote: At 3:30 PM -0400 6/24/03, sinclair44 wrote: On 6/24/03 3:05 PM, Paul Hoffman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: OK, I got a copy of the file I need from ftp.gnupg.ca. Where do I put it to make Fink think that it already has the file so it can move forwards? I'd look more at the email Alexander Hansen sent (i.e. you're out of date) but /sw/src should work fine. Thanks to all. I did that, and it installed fine. But you are still out of date and need to run selfupdate. -Ben --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] New gcc 3.3 compatible with fink compiling?
On Monday, June 23, 2003, at 08:06 PM, Michèle Garoche wrote: I'd like to know if it's advisable now to use the gcc 3.3 as default compiler right now or does it conflict with the way Fink operates? Michèle Many packages will not yet compile with 3.3, including apt. Additionally there are ABI changes which will seriously break things if you mix 3.1 and 3.3 compiled libraries. You can install 3.3 currently if you make sure to run 'sudo gcc_select 3.1' before using fink. -Ben --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] fink and root privileges
On Saturday, June 21, 2003, at 09:12 AM, Jerry Talkington wrote: If you need this feature, you could work on updating this patch--it's now a bit old. Also, you could help figure out how we should handle packages that need root privileges, like passwd (adding users), passwd and similar packages should have system-package equivalents (like system-xfree86), since the user may not need to install them (I have them already installed from my stable fink tree, but people could have already have them installed from a NetInfo root, NIS, LDAP, etc.). Won't work, all users need them. fink users can mix apt-get and source installs. user IDs must match, so the passwd package uses the same UIDs for everyone. The best way to do it will be with a shared passwd database and a passwd package that adds the users on demand to the specific UIDs specified in the shared passwd database. daemonic (running daemons), There could be a dummy package that shows that an equivalent is installed (with possibly a script that pretends to do daemonic's job, but doesn't actually install the stuff in /Library/StartupItems.) Actually, daemonic daemons are installed by the user with the 'sudo daemonic enable' command. There is no harm in having a daemonic package installed and not running that command. Most of them make little sense for a non-admin account in any case. -Ben --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] how to modify a package
On Tuesday, June 10, 2003, at 10:37 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello all: I have a package on my machine that has a default value compiled in. I would like to change the default value, which involves modifying one line of source code. How can I interrupt the installation process so diff -u originalfile.c modifiedfile.c /sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/finkinfo/libs/foo-1.1-1.patch then the patch will be applied when it is built, assuming the package has a Patch field. If not, you can add one. See http://fink.sourceforge.net/doc/packaging/reference.php , it really is quite easy. -Ben --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: eBay Great deals on office technology -- on eBay now! Click here: http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5 ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] sw_vers zombies after fink update-all
On Wednesday, June 11, 2003, at 02:43 PM, Michèle Garoche wrote: I've launched fink selfupdate-cvs at 5:33 am (UCT +2) today. Then fink update-all. I've never seen those sw_vers zombies before. fink update-all is not finished yet (kde compiling still in progress). Does somebody have any idea what's wrong here? Try 'pstree' which will give you a nice tree representation of your processes. (show you who called what) It is in fink. -Ben --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: eBay Great deals on office technology -- on eBay now! Click here: http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5 ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] where to define fink mirrors
For sources, you can do it now. Update to fink 0.13.0 and add your URL
to the file:
/sw/lib/fink/mirror/master
(see the other files there for the format)
then run 'fink configure' and select MasterFirst, and select your site
as the chosen mirror.
-Ben
On Sunday, June 8, 2003, at 07:59 PM, Vincent Danen wrote:
Quick question. I mirrored the fink distrib (all 11GB) and have it
sitting
on my LAN for my mac machines to use. Tried on my powerbook and
modifying
the apt sources works peachy... no errors anymore... =)
My question is how do I tell fink to use this mirror? It's an
internal,
non-public, unofficial mirror and I can't see anywhere in
/sw/etc/fink.conf
to tell fink to use it instead of whatever it's currently using for
package
info, etc.
Or is the fink mirror stuff (direct_download off of
us.dl.sourceforge.net)
just apt stuff, and for fink I just have to keep doing a
selfupdate-cvs?
Thanks for any info.
--
MandrakeSoft Security; http://www.mandrakesecure.net/
Online Security Resource Book; http://linsec.ca/
lynx -source http://linsec.ca/vdanen.asc | gpg --import
{FE6F2AFD : 88D8 0D23 8D4B 3407 5BD7 66F9 2043 D0E5 FE6F 2AFD}
mime-attachment
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The best
thread debugger on the planet. Designed with thread debugging features
you've never dreamed of, try TotalView 6 free at www.etnus.com.
___
Fink-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] CVS note
On Monday, June 9, 2003, at 04:18 PM, Chuck Robey wrote: You're right. I went reading into it to write up a patch, and found it too. I've thought up several other ways to screw it up, but they won't work in this situation. While you are patching fink cvs commands, how about making it work if ~/.cvspass gets hosed? that happens often (it is a faq) -Ben --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The best thread debugger on the planet. Designed with thread debugging features you've never dreamed of, try TotalView 6 free at www.etnus.com. ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] Groff 1.19 and Fink
I'll resurrect the old package as 1.19 and remove vasi as maintainer since he doesn't want to it seems. -Ben On Thursday, June 5, 2003, at 01:28 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote: It sounds like you just volunteered ;-) Actually, it looks like groff-1.19 works without doing any patching: I built it on my machine with no problems (using the environment settings from http://fink.sourceforge.net/faq/usage-general.php#compile-myself , and it seems to run OK. I'll put a formal request in on your behalf. On 6/5/03 1:28 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Finkers [can one say that?], in ancient Fink times, there was a Fink groff, because the Mac OS X groff was even more ancient. Then Mac OS X caught up, and the Fink groff was deleted. (Is this fiction? My brain tries to tell me this is true.) Now, Mac OS X comes with groff 1.17.1, which is nice, except that it does not have a Euro symbol. This, of course, is a killer here in Old Europe. Would it be possible to resurrect Fink groff at 1.19? Gruesse, Carsten --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The best thread debugger on the planet. Designed with thread debugging features you've never dreamed of, try TotalView 6 free at www.etnus.com. ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users -- Alexander K. Hansen Associate Research Scientist, Columbia University visiting MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center Levitated Dipole Experiment 175 Albany Street, NW17-219 Cambridge, MA 02139-4213 --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The best thread debugger on the planet. Designed with thread debugging features you've never dreamed of, try TotalView 6 free at www.etnus.com. ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The best thread debugger on the planet. Designed with thread debugging features you've never dreamed of, try TotalView 6 free at www.etnus.com. ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] Groff 1.19 and Fink
On Sunday, June 8, 2003, at 10:30 PM, Carsten Bormann wrote: Source-MD5: c12bf574120df33ec8c18d92703e099e DocFiles: BUG-REPORT COPYING NEWS PROBLEMS README -ConfigureParams: --mandir=%i/share/man/ --infodir=%i/share/info +ConfigureParams: --mandir=%i/share/man/ --infodir=%i/share/info CXX=g++2 GCC: 3.1 SetCXX: g++2 is another way to do it normally, but groff doesn't seem to like that. Anyway thanks, fixed. Do you want to be the maintainer? :) -Ben --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The best thread debugger on the planet. Designed with thread debugging features you've never dreamed of, try TotalView 6 free at www.etnus.com. ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] gcc: unrecognized option `-pthreads'
On Friday, April 11, 2003, at 03:52 PM, David Orlovich wrote: Something I noticed is that one of the -p options that (I think) autoconfig determined for gcc is `-pthreads' and I keep getting the error: gcc: unrecognized option `-pthreads' It is not an 'error'. It is a warning. Don't use the word 'error' unless the compile fails. Maybe this doesn't matter at all - but I'm wondering why gcc is getting an option that it doesn't understand. I'm running Apple's X-11. Doesn't matter at all. -Ben --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The debugger for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you feeling lost and disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available on major UNIX and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] looking for GNU-find .. ?
On Thursday, March 27, 2003, at 12:57 AM, Martin Costabel wrote: Fink has the findutils package that installs GNU find. I don't run it here, because it insists on installing anacron and daemonic which I don't want. Actually it just 'insists on' cron-service. (btw: the word is Depends: on, not Insists:) Just make a package that provides cron-service to satisfy it. It would be useful to have a system-cron with some sort of system or script that lets apple's cron source the scripts in /sw/etc/cron.*. -Ben --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: The Definitive IT and Networking Event. Be There! NetWorld+Interop Las Vegas 2003 -- Register today! http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?keyn0001en ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] Update-all failure with arts
On Tuesday, March 25, 2003, at 04:02 PM, Tom Dove wrote: .. audioiocoreaudio.cc: In function `OSStatus PropertyListenerProc(long unsigned int, void*)': audioiocoreaudio.cc:611: warning: unused variable `UInt32 propertySize' audioiocoreaudio.cc:612: warning: unused variable `AudioDeviceID deviceID' make[3]: *** [libartsflow_la.all_cc.lo] Error 1 make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs mv -f artsflow.o .libs/artsflow.o make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make: *** [all] Error 2 ### execution of /var/tmp/tmp.0.rE52Hx failed, exit code 2 Failed: compiling arts-1.1.0-17 failed === Suggestions? Yes. Paste the actual error, you snipped it and just pasted warnings. -Ben --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: The Definitive IT and Networking Event. Be There! NetWorld+Interop Las Vegas 2003 -- Register today! http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?keyn0001en ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] gnome-python/gramps
On Sunday, March 23, 2003, at 06:07 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote: On my system, glibtool is provided by libtool14. Install it if you don't have it, and rebuild it if you do. No, it isn't. /usr/bin/glibtool comes with the Developer Tools. Anyone who is missing it shoudl reinstall the december 2002 devtools. (make sure to install all opional packages) -Ben --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: The Definitive IT and Networking Event. Be There! NetWorld+Interop Las Vegas 2003 -- Register today! http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?keyn0001en ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] rpm-4.0.4-1 failed to build
Install the Java 1.4 SDK from connect.apple.com. This is the Java problem i mentioned a few days ago on the list. (it may need to go in the faq, until someone makes a java virtual package) -Ben On Tuesday, March 18, 2003, at 08:52 PM, Kow K wrote: A build of rpm-4.0.4-1 failed on Fink 0.5.1.cvs, 0.12.1 running on 10.2.4, with the following error. Any ideas? Kow [snipped] /bin/sh ./libtool --mode=compile gcc -flat_namespace -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -DOPTIMIZE_POWERPC -O3 -g -fsigned-char -I/System/Library/Frameworks/JavaVM.framework/Versions/1.4.1/Home/../ .../../Headers -c javaglue.c gcc -flat_namespace -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -DOPTIMIZE_POWERPC -O3 -g -fsigned-char -I/System/Library/Frameworks/JavaVM.framework/Versions/1.4.1/Home/../ .../../Headers -c javaglue.c -fno-common -DPIC -o javaglue.lo javaglue.h:6: header file 'jni.h' not found --- This SF.net email is sponsored by:Crypto Challenge is now open! Get cracking and register here for some mind boggling fun and the chance of winning an Apple iPod: http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0031en ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] Compile fails for both apt-0.5.4-8 and dpkg-1.10.9-2
On Saturday, February 22, 2003, at 06:37 PM, Paul McNabola wrote: I can't locate a CoreFoundation.h on my machine and wonder where it might be from. I have Dev Tools Dec 2002 installed on 10.2.4. Reinstall them, then, the install must not have completed. -Ben --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SlickEdit Inc. Develop an edge. The most comprehensive and flexible code editor you can use. Code faster. C/C++, C#, Java, HTML, XML, many more. FREE 30-Day Trial. www.slickedit.com/sourceforge ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] Fink 0.5.1 problem
On Friday, February 21, 2003, at 01:27 PM, Jeff Whitaker wrote: fink rebuild nedit should do it. Or just fink update-all, really. -Ben --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SlickEdit Inc. Develop an edge. The most comprehensive and flexible code editor you can use. Code faster. C/C++, C#, Java, HTML, XML, many more. FREE 30-Day Trial. www.slickedit.com/sourceforge ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] gtk-perl-pm failed to make (2)
No, you should ignore those warnings. dpkg overwrites them at deb install time perl is confused because it sees the old versions under /sw while it is installing a new version into the deb root. If you rm them yourself you will remove the new versions! -Ben On Wednesday, February 19, 2003, at 06:53 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote: I'd mv them instead, in case of a problem. On Wed, 2003-02-19 at 09:34, Michèle Garoche wrote: I've changed the order stable / unstable tree in fink.conf putting unstable first, then run fink index and rerun selfupdate cvs. This time gtk-perl installed still with the same warnings plus those ones: ## Differing version of auto/Gtk/Gtk.bundle found. You might like to rm /sw/lib/perl5/darwin/auto/Gtk/Gtk.bundle ## Differing version of auto/Gtk/Gdk/ImlibImage/ImlibImage.bundle found. You might like to rm /sw/lib/perl5/darwin/auto/Gtk/Gdk/ImlibImage/ImlibImage.bundle ## Differing version of auto/Gtk/Gdk/Pixbuf/Pixbuf.bundle found. You might like to rm /sw/lib/perl5/darwin/auto/Gtk/Gdk/Pixbuf/Pixbuf.bundle ## Differing version of auto/Gtk/XmHTML/XmHTML.bundle found. You might like to rm /sw/lib/perl5/darwin/auto/Gtk/XmHTML/XmHTML.bundle ## Differing version of auto/Gtk/GladeXML/GladeXML.bundle found. You might like to rm /sw/lib/perl5/darwin/auto/Gtk/GladeXML/GladeXML.bundle Should I rm the suggested files? Michèle http://micmacfr.homeunix.org/ --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SlickEdit Inc. Develop an edge. The most comprehensive and flexible code editor you can use. Code faster. C/C++, C#, Java, HTML, XML, many more. FREE 30-Day Trial. www.slickedit.com/sourceforge ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users -- Alexander K. Hansen Associate Research Scientist, Columbia University visiting MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center Levitated Dipole Experiment 175 Albany Street, NW17-219 Cambridge, MA 02139-4213 --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SlickEdit Inc. Develop an edge. The most comprehensive and flexible code editor you can use. Code faster. C/C++, C#, Java, HTML, XML, many more. FREE 30-Day Trial. www.slickedit.com/sourceforge ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SlickEdit Inc. Develop an edge. The most comprehensive and flexible code editor you can use. Code faster. C/C++, C#, Java, HTML, XML, many more. FREE 30-Day Trial. www.slickedit.com/sourceforge ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] tetex testing needed
On Sunday, February 16, 2003, at 08:23 AM, Enrico Franconi wrote: The following are the (many more) commands which are in GW tex but not in fink tetex: Lots of those things are in other fink packages. For example t1binary, t1ascii, etc are in the t1utils package. GW likes to spread anti-Fink FUD. The Fink tex distribution is fine. If its missing something specific that you need, let us know and it can be packaged. -Ben --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] problems launching apps
You probably need to wait a few minutes. It takes that long to launch. Really. -Ben On Sunday, February 16, 2003, at 01:40 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote: If everything is set up properly, then when you invoke /sw/bin/kword, (for example), you should get a bunch of messages in your terminal about various apps starting up. Do you mean that you get literally nothing? On Sun, 16 Feb 2003, Matt Singerman wrote: Run, from a terminal. I don't want to actually use KDE, I just have it installed so KOffice's dependencies will be in place. Quoting Benjamin Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Sunday, February 16, 2003, at 01:02 PM, Matt Singerman wrote: Hello all, I am running 10.2.4 and have fink 0.5.1 installed, along with apple's x11 0.2.1. I attempting to install KDE and KOffice (I really only wanted KOffice) from the binaries, and everything seems to be installed fine. However, if I try to launch /sw/bin/kword (or konqueror, or anything...) nothing happens. Am I doing something wrong? Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. What do you mean by try to launch? Are you running it from the run menu in KDE? Or a terminal? Did you set up your .xinitrc like http://fink.sf.net/news/kde.php says? If so you should have some useful logs in /tmp/kde.log that may say what's going on. - This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/ --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users -- Alexander K. Hansen Associate Research Scientist, Columbia University visiting MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center Levitated Dipole Experiment 175 Albany Street, NW17-219 Cambridge, MA 02139-4213 --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] pine / uw-imapd incompatibility
On Wednesday, February 12, 2003, at 01:11 PM, Chris Devers wrote: Sorry if this is in the archives, I poked around but didn't see anything really related to this. Why is it that Fink's pine uw-imapd (or uw-imapd-ssl) packages can't be installed at the same time? You can have a mail client or a mail server, but you can't have both at the same time? Is there a good reason for this? Pine includes imapd. -Ben --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: FREE SSL Guide from Thawte are you planning your Web Server Security? Click here to get a FREE Thawte SSL guide and find the answers to all your SSL security issues. http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0026en ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] Libtool 1.4.2 and 1.4.3 C++ bundle linking problems
On Saturday, February 8, 2003, at 12:54 PM, Nicholas Riley wrote: The problem with 1.4.2 seems obvious; the problem with 1.4.3 is that, no matter what I try to do (RangerRick suggested CC=c++) libtool uses gcc for linking. If I try to use -lstdc++, libtool 1.4.3 complains that it can't link it dynamically and refuses to create a bundle, only a static library, which is useless for what I need. You need to pass --mode=CXX to libtool, i believe. (or something similar) -Ben --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] Need help with .info file
selfupdate-cvs and try again, should be fixed... had a typo in there. -Ben On Friday, February 7, 2003, at 06:05 PM, Ken Botwinick wrote: Installing from the unstable/crypto tree, I get: *** [cadaver] Error 1 unescape ### execution of make failed, exit code 2 Failed: compiling cadaver-ssl-0.20.5-1 failed There seems to be some confusion about neon. It wants neon 18 and 23... Any ideas? Ken On Friday, February 7, 2003, at 05:37 AM, Ben Hines wrote: On Friday, February 7, 2003, at 02:14 AM, Ken Botwinick wrote: I'll update the package and try to add netrc support. Why not just email the maintainer? (me :) Should be in later... Well, for a couple a reasons. I'm new to this whole process, and I should understand how to do it manually in general in case I need to do it to something else. I just tried to rebuild, but the --enable-netrc still isn't there. Is there a command I need to run to get the new .info file? I'm not sure why everyone wouldn't have wanted .netrc support in there. I'm using cadaver in a cron job and don't want to have to enter my password manually. Is there some other way I could have accomplished the same thing without .netrc? Its in the unstable/crypto tree. You need to fink selfupdate-cvs to get it. -Ben --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
[Fink-users] Virex ships/overwrites fink libraries
This is very bad. Fink users, don't install this. Virex 7.2, free to all .mac members installs: /Volumes/Virex 7.2.dmg/Virex 7.2.pkg 328 % lsbom Contents/Resources/Virex\ 7.2.bom | grep sw ./sw40775 0/80 ./sw/lib40775 0/80 ./sw/lib/libcrypto.0.9.6.dylib 100644 0/80945416 3192711062 ./sw/lib/libcurl.2.0.2.dylib100644 0/80634480 510417796 ./sw/lib/libcurl.2.dylib100644 0/80634480 510417796 ./sw/lib/libdl.0.dylib 100644 0/8015124 4193639260 ./sw/lib/libssl.0.9.6.dylib 100644 0/80261776 3001832603 Found out on IRC, also someone noticed on the mcafee site. http://forums.mcafeehelp.com/viewtopic.php?t=6318sid=33d08f3c34f7e09dc546aa1ddf1c299c -Ben
Re: [Fink-users] one more point of confusion
On Friday, January 31, 2003, at 03:16 PM, Michael Bovee wrote: Okay one more, I wanted to try to 'wget' some stuff from that there internet. Just to be sure I tried it in Terminal first and got 'command not found'. I figured this was not part of the default install anyway, so after messing with troubles with scrollkeeper and such, I installed wget-ssl with Fink and then tried it in an xterm under XDarwin (I use Windowmaker). It worked. But then I got an idea and tried it again in Terminal.app and now it works there too. (?) So my question is, what do I need XDarwin and Windowmaker for? My guess would be that a lot of other apps won't work outside XDarwin, but I am confused nonetheless. Is there a way to 'activate' wget as part of the basic MacOS X BSD package? If I ask 'which wget' it is the one in /sw/bin/, so I haven't inadvertently just started using a built in BSD version. You seem confused. wget does not come with OS X, you must install it with fink, or no wget. only curl comes with OS X. - Ben --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] major problem with fink X11 perl script
On Thursday, January 30, 2003, at 06:01 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: In case folks haven't noticed, there is a major problem with the perl script to fix the shared lib names for the MacOS X X11 beta files. If you look at the log from update_prebinding on a machine that has had the perl script run on it, you will notice it breaks prebinding on all of the files in the MacOS X X11 beta. The prebinding mechanism doesn't recognize the new filenames for the shared The script does not change any filenames. -Ben --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] major problem with fink X11 perl script
Aha, i see. You can fix that by updating the install_name in binaries that were built against the bad X11 libs. I'll enhance the script to fix those too. Will post when i get it working. Anyway - this problem is not major - major was the massive build failures apple's broken libraries caused. :) -Ben On Thursday, January 30, 2003, at 07:32 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: Ben, I see the following type of errors for all the binaries in X11 when update_prebinding gets run after your perl script has been used. 2003-01-29 22:45:58.751 update_prebinding[9384] redo_prebinding on /usr/X11R6/bin/xcmsdb: executable: /usr/X11R6/bin/xcmsdb (architecture ppc) must be rebuilt, dynamic shared library: /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.6.2.dylib does not match its install_name: /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.6.dylib You can see this if your run update_prebinding -force -root / as root. Again this means when 10.2.4 comes out and is installed, update_prebinding will get run and X11 will become unprebound. This will also happen with any installer that calls update_prebinding. Jack ps A clean install of the X11 beta and SDK prebinds fine with the command above. --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] mysql CLI errors
On Tuesday, January 28, 2003, at 07:39 AM, Justin Wright wrote: I recently upgraded to Jaguar, and subsequently upgraded fink. finkcommander shows readline 4.2a-5 and mysql 3.23.49-2 installed. Your fink update did not complete properly, those are 10.1 versions. Do all the steps on: http://fink.sourceforge.net/download/10.2-upgrade.php Sorry for the hassle, there were issues in the 10.1-10.2 update :) (future updates after that you can do with selfupdate) -Ben --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] libpng warning
On Tuesday, January 28, 2003, at 07:22 PM, David R. Morrison wrote: The warning is confusing, because it refers to libpng, but the fix actually has to do with the imlib package. Until amaya can be updated, you should downgrade imlib as described on Fink's webpage. It was updated before your email was sent. -Ben --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] Proxy settings OK for Fink, not for FinkCommander
On Thursday, January 23, 2003, at 08:13 AM, H.Fagard wrote: At 10:57 -0500 23/01/03, Alexander Hansen wrote: Have you tried setting HTTP_PROXY et al. in the FC Preferences? See my first message: At 15:04 +0100 23/01/03, H.Fagard wrote: I have checked the proxy settings in Preferences/Download: they are exactly identical to those entered through fink configure. Try setting them in the Environment pane instead. -BEn --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] Mutt and URL's in e-mail: how to launch an aqua browser?
On Thursday, January 23, 2003, at 06:28 PM, Rogério Brito wrote: On Jan 21 2003, Martin Costabel wrote: Rogério Brito wrote: BTW, as another question, is there any reason (lack of manpower, perhaps) on why the urlview isn't present in fink? You know, of course, the package request tracker at http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?atid=371315group_id=17203 There is also a package-submit tracker for the case that you already prepared a fink package for urlview :-) I can make a fink package for urlview (I just compiled it from sources and it worked great coupled with mutt) and contribute it to the Fink project, but I have a question: how does one create a package for Fink? A package for urlview was made a couple days ago. selfupdate-cvs to get it. For docs on making fink packages, see the fink website, click documentation. There is a large packaging manual as well as a powerpoint presentation. :) And look at, for example, /sw/fink/10.2/unstable/main/finkinfo/net/urlview-0.9-1.info and /sw/fink/10.2/unstable/main/finkinfo/net/urlview-0.9-1.patch -Ben --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] Problems with restFP and saveFP
On Wednesday, January 22, 2003, at 12:13 PM, Alexandre Enkerli wrote: I have no idea if this has to do with fink, but maybe I can find help here. Some packages I'm trying to install from source generate errors at make. Here's this error in the context of compiling the latest version of Apache 2. ld: .libs/libapr-0.0.9.2.dylib-master.o has external relocation entries in non-writable section (__TEXT,__text) for symbols: restFP saveFP /usr/bin/libtool: internal link edit command failed make[3]: *** [libapr-0.la] Error 1 make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 You have some gnu-darwin things in /usr/local, i believe, like libgcc.dylib. Get rid of them. -Ben --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Scholarships for Techies! Can't afford IT training? All 2003 ictp students receive scholarships. Get hands-on training in Microsoft, Cisco, Sun, Linux/UNIX, and more. www.ictp.com/training/sourceforge.asp ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] LibUSB 0.1.7-1 update won't build
Please send me your full libusb build log. (off list) -Ben On Wednesday, January 22, 2003, at 05:20 AM, lenny bruce wrote: For a long time now I couldn't get Speex 1.0beta3-2 or LibUSB 0.1.7-1 to update. Speex finally built tonight for some unknown reason but LibUSB is still failing: ld: Undefined symbols: _usb_get_string_simple ### execution of /var/tmp/tmp.0.Wizvnp failed, exit code 2 Failed: compiling libusb-0.1.7-1 failed make[2]: *** [testlibusb] Error 1 make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make: *** [all-recursive-am] Error 2 anybody have a hint? lenny bruceI am not a comedian, [EMAIL PROTECTED]I am Lenny Bruce. --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Scholarships for Techies! Can't afford IT training? All 2003 ictp students receive scholarships. Get hands-on training in Microsoft, Cisco, Sun, Linux/UNIX, and more. www.ictp.com/training/sourceforge.asp ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Scholarships for Techies! Can't afford IT training? All 2003 ictp students receive scholarships. Get hands-on training in Microsoft, Cisco, Sun, Linux/UNIX, and more. www.ictp.com/training/sourceforge.asp ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] dpkg-1.10.9-2 failure
On Monday, January 20, 2003, at 11:15 PM, Gary Elshaw wrote: Anyone have any idea what's going on here? Usage: head [-options] url... http://fink.sourceforge.net/faq/comp-general.php#head -Ben --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] mpg123 problems
On Friday, January 17, 2003, at 04:57 AM, Marcus Bointon wrote: If anyone is installing mpg123, I think you should read this: http://security-archive.merton.ox.ac.uk/bugtraq-200301/0137.html True, but it is highly unlikely that one would make a trojaned .mp3 that targets OS X powerpc, with MachO calling conventions.. the trojan out there surely targets x86. Anyway, there is an alternative, in fink now which is being more actively developed: mpg321. fink install mpg321 -Ben --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: Thawte.com - A 128-bit supercerts will allow you to extend the highest allowed 128 bit encryption to all your clients even if they use browsers that are limited to 40 bit encryption. Get a guide here:http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0030en ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] Can't install new dpkg w/ cvs
On Friday, January 17, 2003, at 01:20 PM, Gary Olson wrote: I tried to remove xml-parser-pm (which requires removing some other perlmods first) thinking that I could then download and recompile this perlmod. Then I would try updating again. However, I can not remove it using apt-get, dselect, or fink. Is Fink broken because dpkg is only partially installed.? Just rebuild it. fink rebuild xml-parser-pm -Ben --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: Thawte.com - A 128-bit supercerts will allow you to extend the highest allowed 128 bit encryption to all your clients even if they use browsers that are limited to 40 bit encryption. Get a guide here:http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0030en ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] Fink Installation question
On Wednesday, January 15, 2003, at 05:42 PM, Don Thompson wrote: Dear List-Members, I have recently removed my old Fink installation. I then down loaded the Fink 0.5.0a Binary Installer and attempted to install the new version. This failed apparently because I have set-up a symbolic link to a second hard drive. Is this feature of the installer a bug or is it to protect people from installing over an older version? Either way could some tell me how to perform an install to a symbolically linked /sw directory? 1. Remove /sw 2. Install. 3. Move /sw to another drive (ditto is good to use) 4. Create /sw symlink to new location. We will make this easier in the future. -Ben --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: A Thawte Code Signing Certificate is essential in establishing user confidence by providing assurance of authenticity and code integrity. Download our Free Code Signing guide: http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0028en ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] Fink Installation question
On Wednesday, January 15, 2003, at 06:13 PM, Don Thompson wrote: Ben, I had thought about that; however, the FAQ and prior experience on my part would suggest that there will be questionable results with this approach. Earlier releases of fink have numerous hard coded paths to the install location. Ran into this problem recently when I had /sw on a second volume and that volume developed unrecoverable disk problems. ditto will move everything; however, executing anything becomes a matter of going through all kinds of scripts changing paths. They still do. As long as your create the symlink, the hard coded paths will be fine. You MUST create the symlink /sw to your new location. -Ben --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: A Thawte Code Signing Certificate is essential in establishing user confidence by providing assurance of authenticity and code integrity. Download our Free Code Signing guide: http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0028en ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] Checking for threaded X11
On Monday, January 13, 2003, at 09:49 AM, Justin Walker wrote: Perhaps 'otool' will help. If the threaded libraries are distinguished by name, you can tell by looking at the output from 'otool -Lv YourBinaryHere'. ... except that they aren't distinguished by name. :) I refer you to http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html#id2840408 -Ben --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: FREE SSL Guide from Thawte are you planning your Web Server Security? Click here to get a FREE Thawte SSL guide and find the answers to all your SSL security issues. http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0026en ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] Bluefish, Apple X11, and xfree86-threaded?
On Thursday, January 9, 2003, at 10:54 AM, Michèle Garoche wrote: Le jeudi, 9 jan 2003, à 19:46 Europe/Paris, Alexander Hansen a écrit : Have you tried removing xfree86-rootless-threaded first? Same. sudo /sw/bin/fink remove xfree86-rootless-threaded Password: Information about 2063 packages read in 1 seconds. Please see the FAQ. -Ben --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] Bluefish, Apple X11, and xfree86-threaded?
And you'll need to reinstall apple's X11 packages afterwards as well, because you corrupted your install by installing them first. -Ben On Thursday, January 9, 2003, at 11:04 AM, David R. Morrison wrote: Try the instructions: http://fink.sourceforge.net/doc/x11/inst-xfree86.php#switching-x11 -- Dave On Jan 9,2003 19:54:16 +0100, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Mich=E8le_Garoche?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote : Le jeudi, 9 jan 2003, à 19:46 Europe/Paris, Alexander Hansen a écrit : Have you tried removing xfree86-rootless-threaded first? Same. sudo /sw/bin/fink remove xfree86-rootless-threaded Password: Information about 2063 packages read in 1 seconds. pkg xfree86-rootless-threaded version ### pkg xfree86-rootless-threaded version 4.2.1.1-3 dpkg --remove xfree86-rootless-threaded dpkg : un problème de dépendance empêche la suppression de xfree86-rootless-threaded : gtkglarea2-shlibs dépend de libgl ; cependant : Paquet libgl n'est pas installé. Paquet xfree86-rootless-threaded qui fournit libgl doit être supprimé. xforms-shlibs dépend de libgl ; cependant : Paquet libgl n'est pas installé. Paquet xfree86-rootless-threaded qui fournit libgl doit être supprimé. gtkglarea dépend de libgl ; cependant : Paquet libgl n'est pas installé. Paquet xfree86-rootless-threaded qui fournit libgl doit être supprimé. dpkg : erreur de traitement de xfree86-rootless-threaded (--remove) : problème de dépendance - suppression ignorée Des erreurs ont été rencontrées pendant l'exécution : xfree86-rootless-threaded ### execution of dpkg failed, exit code 1 Failed: can't remove package xfree86-rootless-threaded To get things back how they were, do: sudo mv /usr/X11R6_bak /usr/X11R6 sudo mv /etc/X11_bak/etc/X11 Already done, because I could not launch either XDarwin nor X11. Now verify that your normal XDarwin works. Let me know here what happens. Yes, it works, though I have some warnings. The problem was that fink still thought that you had xfree86-base-threaded installed, when you didn't. Try the same procedure as before, except do this first thing off: fink remove xfree86-base-threaded fink remove xfree86-rootless-threaded I cannot. (Sorry the warnings are in French). Basically I'm told there is a problem of dependencies and xfree86-base-threaded cannot be removed because package X11 is not installed. sudo /sw/bin/fink remove xfree86-base-threaded Password: Information about 2063 packages read in 2 seconds. pkg xfree86-base-threaded version ### pkg xfree86-base-threaded version 4.2.1.1-3 dpkg --remove xfree86-base-threaded dpkg : un problème de dépendance empêche la suppression de xfree86-base-threaded : xfree86-rootless-threaded dépend de xfree86-base-threaded (= 4.2.1.1-3). xfonts-shinonome dépend de x11 ; cependant : Paquet x11 n'est pas installé. Paquet xfree86-base-threaded qui fournit x11 doit être supprimé. .. dpkg : erreur de traitement de xfree86-base-threaded (--remove) : problème de dépendance - suppression ignorée Des erreurs ont été rencontrées pendant l'exécution : xfree86-base-threaded ### execution of dpkg failed, exit code 1 Failed: can't remove package xfree86-base-threaded So, what's now Michèle http://micmacfr.homeunix.org/ --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld http://www.vasoftware.com ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] Re: Apple Announces X11 for Mac OS X
On Wednesday, January 8, 2003, at 11:15 AM, Hal Sadofsky wrote: 1) does Apple's new XonX run rooted as well as rootless? No. 2) does it take more advantage (rooted) of the hardware? (Certain things - scrolling, moving windows - are very slow on my ibook for example.) It is always in rootless mode, but it is all quartz accelerated and super fast. Really, really fast. -Ben --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] Mozilla compile failing
On Monday, January 6, 2003, at 03:09 PM, Isreal Packard wrote: I've installed the December developer tools. Same results. 2002? Not 2001? Still need more info, like versions of everything fink you have. And whether you have any GNU-Darwin corruption on your system. -Ben --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] X11 from Apple.com alongside XDarwin
On Tuesday, January 7, 2003, at 12:26 PM, Jeffrey Sanders wrote: I installed it. Seems okay. I ran Gimp with it. The odd thing is that it is still running window maker instead of it's own window manager. If anyone can figure out what it's window manager is called, I would love to try it. I think you need to remove the ~/.xinitrc file comepletely, so it doesn't launch twm or anything at all. The quartz-wm wouldn't work till i renamed the file totally. -Ben --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] system-xfree86 troubles.
On Tuesday, January 7, 2003, at 01:43 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Odd number of elements in hash assignment at /sw/lib/perl5/Fink/PkgVersion.pm line 1730. What do you get when you type: sh -c . /sw/bin/init.sh; /usr/bin/env --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] Re: Apple Announces X11 for Mac OS X
On Tuesday, January 7, 2003, at 03:46 PM, Vivien Mary Kendon wrote: I can confirm that it doesn't in any way interfere with my already fink-installed xfree86/XDarwin stuff. I removed nothing, and installed without adding the X11 config (the default, as Kow pointed out). Actually, it does interfere with them 100%. If you didn't remove the fink versions first, the Apple installer wrote over all your fink x11 packages with its own versions. You need to force remove the fink packages and install system-xfree86. But, the force removal will remove the apple versions now, because you didn't remove the fink versions first. -Ben --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] Copying between X and OS X environments?
On Tuesday, January 7, 2003, at 08:24 PM, Wolfgang Rumpf wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Is there any way to get common clipboard functionality between, say, Microsoft Word (or any other OS X application) and an X app? For example, I want to copy an image from GIMP and paste it directly into Word - or copy an image from OpenOffice and paste it into GraphicConverter. Is there a way to enable this? Works out of the box with the new Apple X11. (for text, at least, dunno about pictures) command-C to copy in X, and control-v to paste. (strange, yes, control to paste) With the standard, old, slow xfree, you can use autocutsel. fink install autocutsel. -Ben --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
[Fink-users] Re: Apple Announces X11 for Mac OS X
On Tuesday, January 7, 2003, at 11:34 AM, Finlay Dobbie wrote: http://www.apple.com/macosx/x11/ Just thought y'all should know :-) -- Finlay The user install download link at http://www.apple.com/macosx/x11/download/ is broken currently. The SDK posted there won't help anyone, its just libraries and headers. For those who want to try it out later, when the download works. dpkg -r --force-depends xfree86-base dpkg -r --force-depends xfree86-base-shlibs install the SDK from apple - http://www.apple.com/macosx/x11/ install the user install from apple - http://www.apple.com/macosx/x11/download/ fink install system-xfree86 Hopefully it'll work, dont have the full installer from apple yet. -Ben --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] What do you guys make of this?
On Tuesday, January 7, 2003, at 12:00 PM, Liam mac Lynne wrote: The binary installer appears to be up now - http://www.apple.com/macosx/x11/download, but I don't have access to a Mac at work to check that the ~4 MB file is the real McCoy. Slan, Liam You need both the 41MB (user) and 4MB (SDK) if you want to replace fink's X11. Also apparently the current system-xfree86 might not work right with apple's x11, so until that is updated, you might want to wait. Hopefully we can fix that today. -Ben --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] Successful build of qt3-3.1.1-3
On Sunday, January 5, 2003, at 10:17 PM, Martin Costabel wrote: No. I would be against installing it by default. It seems you have to take time to learn how to configure it or clean it up from time to time or whatever. I had a bad experience where every compilation slowed down to a crawl because of ccache, so I had to remove it. Any configuration is absolutely worth it. The time spent figuring out (whats to figure out?) ccache is made up 200% fold in time saved rebuilding packages. . (Just make sure to limit the cache size, or clear out ~/.ccache every now and then if you want) Mostly useful for package maintainers, IMO, who need to rebuild identical packages more often than normal users. -Ben --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] KDE 3.1 RC5 available in Fink unstable
On Thursday, January 2, 2003, at 03:23 PM, Benjamin Reed wrote: work. Then it was pointed out that you're not supposed to depend on -dev packages so I removed it (which in this case, I don't agree with, but what the hey). =) You don't agree with the ability to have multiple versions of libraries installed, and to build against them? Why the hell not? Cause thats what you are saying.. I think its one of the best features of fink. It would REALLY SUCK if we could not easily use both libpng and libpng3, and we wouldn't be able to if everyone depended on libpng. There are reasons for these things, its not arbitrary.. your deps on qt3-dev broke your own package qt2 even. -Ben --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] libgdal problems
On Thursday, January 2, 2003, at 06:59 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Whenever I try to run a gdal program, I always get this error: dyld: gdal_translate can't open library: ./libgdal.1.1.dylib (No such file or directory, errno = 2) This means the install_name of the library is wrong: % otool -L /sw/bin/gdal_translate /sw/bin/gdal_translate: ./libgdal.1.1.dylib (compatibility version 0.0.0, current version 0.0.0) /usr/lib/libSystem.B.dylib (compatibility version 1.0.0, current version 60.2.0) % otool -L /sw/lib/libgdal.1.1.dylib /sw/lib/libgdal.1.1.dylib: ./libgdal.1.1.dylib (compatibility version 0.0.0, current version 0.0.0) /sw/lib/libgif.4.dylib (compatibility version 6.0.0, current version 6.0.0) /sw/lib/libpng.2.dylib (compatibility version 1.0.12, current version 1.0.12) /usr/lib/libz.1.1.3.dylib (compatibility version 1.0.0, current version 1.1.3) /sw/lib/libdl.0.dylib (compatibility version 0.0.0, current version 0.0.0) /usr/lib/libSystem.B.dylib (compatibility version 1.0.0, current version 60.2.0) That first entry needs to be /sw/lib/libgdal.1.1.dylib I think this will fix it after the fact (install_name_tool i think only comes with the new dev tools) sudo install_name_tool -change ./libgdal.1.1.dylib /sw/lib/libgdal.1.1.dylib /sw/bin/gdal_translate sudo install_name_tool -change ./libgdal.1.1.dylib /sw/lib/libgdal.1.1.dylib /sw/bin/gdaladdo sudo install_name_tool -id /sw/lib/libgdal.1.1.dylib /sw/lib/libgdal.1.1.dylib However, the package still needs to be fixed to set the proper -install_name when linking for a permanent fix. -Ben --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
[Fink-users] Re: [Fink-devel] Dec 2002 Dev Tools not installed ...
On Thursday, January 2, 2003, at 07:35 PM, Kow K wrote: While this error isn't fatal, I think it would be helpful to indicate this at the beginning of the update process, with a user prompt like: Note: packages qt3-3.1.1-1 ... need Dec 2002 Developer Tools installed. Do you have it already? [y/N] We have no BuildConflicts feature yet in fink, nor do we have a pseudo package for the developer tools that the package could BuildDepend: on. Thus, build time conflicts have to be hacked out in the compile script. I think there are open feature requests for both of these. :) -Ben --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] fink update has gone bananas
On Saturday, December 28, 2002, at 05:16 PM, Stephen Anderson wrote: releases). Here's the tail end of the output from fink selfupdate-cvs : I hope someone can spot the (no doubt trivial) error I've made. There's no obvious problem with the directory /sw/fink/10.2/stable/crypto asfar as I can see. See http://fink.sourceforge.net/faq/usage-fink.php#cvs-busy you need to reset your cvs per that faq.. -Ben --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] Ant don't compile with MacOsX 10.2.3
On Thursday, December 26, 2002, at 01:35 PM, Paolo Cacciatori wrote: Ideas? You need to include the package version, fink version (fink -V), etc in any problem emails, otherwise we have no chance of helping. -Ben --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] how does XFree86-threaded impact OroborOSX ?
On Wednesday, December 25, 2002, at 12:26 PM, lenny bruce wrote: I believe we're being cheated by a transparent payware conspiracy. We're the only platform where HW OpenGL for XFree86 is payware. It must be political. Erm, nice try at a conspiracy theory, but hardware OpenGL support for darwin is in the current Xfree86 CVS. -Ben --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
