Jon,
Thanks very much for getting back to me. I'll continue trying to find a work
around myself and will let you know if I make any progress.
Many thanks,
Jonathan
From: fipy-boun...@nist.gov on behalf of Guyer,
Jonathan E. Dr. (Fed)
Sent: Monday, September 25, 2017 3:34:52 PM
To: FIPY
Subject: Re: 2D Periodic Grid in Parallel
Jonathan -
I see what you're talking about. Fixing (or even working around) has proven
elusive so far, but I'm working on it.
- Jon
> On Sep 20, 2017, at 10:02 AM, Jonathan Smyth wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I am working on a 2D simulation of the drift-diffusion model for
> semiconductors, and I'm having some difficulty with 2D periodic boundary
> conditions when running in parallel. It seems that when using PeriodicGrid2D
> in parallel each "chunk" of the mesh becomes periodic rather than the whole
> mesh being periodic, which causes some strange results. Since the mesh is
> broken up into horizontal slices when in parallel, only the top-bottom
> boundaries are affected by this. Is there any sort of work around for this
> problem?
>
> Many thanks,
> Jonathan
> ---
>
> Jonathan Smyth
> Atomistic Simulation Centre
> School of Maths and Physics
> Queen's University Belfast
> ___
> fipy mailing list
> fipy@nist.gov
> http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy
> [ NIST internal ONLY: https://email.nist.gov/mailman/listinfo/fipy ]
___
fipy mailing list
fipy@nist.gov
http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy
[ NIST internal ONLY: https://email.nist.gov/mailman/listinfo/fipy ]
___
fipy mailing list
fipy@nist.gov
http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy
[ NIST internal ONLY: https://email.nist.gov/mailman/listinfo/fipy ]