Jon, Thanks very much for getting back to me. I'll continue trying to find a work around myself and will let you know if I make any progress.
Many thanks, Jonathan ________________________________ From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of Guyer, Jonathan E. Dr. (Fed) <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, September 25, 2017 3:34:52 PM To: FIPY Subject: Re: 2D Periodic Grid in Parallel Jonathan - I see what you're talking about. Fixing (or even working around) has proven elusive so far, but I'm working on it. - Jon > On Sep 20, 2017, at 10:02 AM, Jonathan Smyth <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello, > > I am working on a 2D simulation of the drift-diffusion model for > semiconductors, and I'm having some difficulty with 2D periodic boundary > conditions when running in parallel. It seems that when using PeriodicGrid2D > in parallel each "chunk" of the mesh becomes periodic rather than the whole > mesh being periodic, which causes some strange results. Since the mesh is > broken up into horizontal slices when in parallel, only the top-bottom > boundaries are affected by this. Is there any sort of work around for this > problem? > > Many thanks, > Jonathan > --- > > Jonathan Smyth > Atomistic Simulation Centre > School of Maths and Physics > Queen's University Belfast > _______________________________________________ > fipy mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy > [ NIST internal ONLY: https://email.nist.gov/mailman/listinfo/fipy ] _______________________________________________ fipy mailing list [email protected] http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy [ NIST internal ONLY: https://email.nist.gov/mailman/listinfo/fipy ]
_______________________________________________ fipy mailing list [email protected] http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy [ NIST internal ONLY: https://email.nist.gov/mailman/listinfo/fipy ]
