RE: [Flashcoders] self published.
socket server? http://www.osflash.org/red5 ? ___ Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com To change your subscription options or search the archive: http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training http://www.figleaf.com http://training.figleaf.com
Re: [Flashcoders] self published.
Red5 requires a jvm (or jre) on the server, if I read correctly. I've been trying to get my host to install one for shared hosting accounts, and would use this red5 over localconnection if I were lucky enough to have java. Mike ___ Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com To change your subscription options or search the archive: http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training http://www.figleaf.com http://training.figleaf.com
RE: [Flashcoders] self published.
Maybe if you have engough clients you could use a dedicated server for all your clients with a maintenance contract so you don't have to do everything yourself ;) But Yes Red5 needs java. You can do something like this with php-sockets but then the hoster will have to set safemode off (because of the runtime limit) and you will have a permanent running script. I don't think the hoster will like to have that ;) -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Mike Britton Verzonden: donderdag 1 juni 2006 15:46 Aan: Flashcoders mailing list Onderwerp: Re: [Flashcoders] self published. Red5 requires a jvm (or jre) on the server, if I read correctly. I've been trying to get my host to install one for shared hosting accounts, and would use this red5 over localconnection if I were lucky enough to have java. Mike ___ Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com To change your subscription options or search the archive: http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training http://www.figleaf.com http://training.figleaf.com ___ Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com To change your subscription options or search the archive: http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training http://www.figleaf.com http://training.figleaf.com
Re: [Flashcoders] self published.
Ah! Very nice! Thank you! Tj On Jun 1, 2006, at 6:36 AM, Bernard Visscher wrote: socket server? http://www.osflash.org/red5 ? ___ Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com To change your subscription options or search the archive: http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training http://www.figleaf.com http://training.figleaf.com ___ Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com To change your subscription options or search the archive: http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training http://www.figleaf.com http://training.figleaf.com
Re: [Flashcoders] self published.
This red5 looks promising. The architecture using java on the backend is fine - in fact Id like it to be scaleable. My only concern is the legality of reverse engineering they have done - and what Macromedia might do or not. Are there some experienced red5 developers here? Regards Tj On Jun 1, 2006, at 6:55 AM, Bernard Visscher wrote: Maybe if you have engough clients you could use a dedicated server for all your clients with a maintenance contract so you don't have to do everything yourself ;) But Yes Red5 needs java. You can do something like this with php-sockets but then the hoster will have to set safemode off (because of the runtime limit) and you will have a permanent running script. I don't think the hoster will like to have that ;) -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Mike Britton Verzonden: donderdag 1 juni 2006 15:46 Aan: Flashcoders mailing list Onderwerp: Re: [Flashcoders] self published. Red5 requires a jvm (or jre) on the server, if I read correctly. I've been trying to get my host to install one for shared hosting accounts, and would use this red5 over localconnection if I were lucky enough to have java. Mike ___ Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com To change your subscription options or search the archive: http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training http://www.figleaf.com http://training.figleaf.com
RE: [Flashcoders] self published.
I might stand alone on this but these questions popped into my mind before I got to the second paragraph of your post: Why would I want an open channel of communication between my applications (swf's) and you? Why must your utility communicate with your servers? Why would you not create your utility and make it available via the exchange as a component instead? From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Thomas Marbois Sent: Tue 5/30/2006 7:40 PM To: flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com Subject: [Flashcoders] self published. Hi I have an idea for a self placed utility using Flash. Meaning I allow users to place this utility in their own domains - and I dont know where those domains are -- and my utility allows me real-time communications between their published file - and my servers. What kind of Flash security issues will i have to work around to get this to work on most or all domains? Is this possible? How? Best regards, TJ ___ Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com To change your subscription options or search the archive: http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training http://www.figleaf.com http://training.figleaf.com ___ Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com To change your subscription options or search the archive: http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training http://www.figleaf.com http://training.figleaf.com
Re: [Flashcoders] self published.
Someone please correct me if I'm wrong, but it would be possible to make a connection between servers using LocalConnection. You'd have to ensure your client swf was assigned an id to authenticate their application to access the data. There would have to be a security model, in other words. Once again I've never done this so take my advice with a grain of salt, but I'm sure interesting things are possible if they are sophisticated enough to drop a crossdomain.xml to give you the ability to distribute components that interact with your data. In this case I have to say Flash would make a compelling choice for your idea. Mike ___ Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com To change your subscription options or search the archive: http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training http://www.figleaf.com http://training.figleaf.com
Re: [Flashcoders] self published.
ah, i think i am going to have to correct you mike. a LocalConnection is for allowint two swf's running in two separate windows on the same machine to talk to each other. On 5/30/06, Mike Britton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Someone please correct me if I'm wrong, but it would be possible to make a connection between servers using LocalConnection. You'd have to ensure your client swf was assigned an id to authenticate their application to access the data. There would have to be a security model, in other words. Once again I've never done this so take my advice with a grain of salt, but I'm sure interesting things are possible if they are sophisticated enough to drop a crossdomain.xml to give you the ability to distribute components that interact with your data. In this case I have to say Flash would make a compelling choice for your idea. Mike ___ Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com To change your subscription options or search the archive: http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training http://www.figleaf.com http://training.figleaf.com ___ Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com To change your subscription options or search the archive: http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training http://www.figleaf.com http://training.figleaf.com
Re: [Flashcoders] self published.
socket server? On May 30, 2006, at 7:40 PM, Thomas Marbois wrote: Hi I have an idea for a self placed utility using Flash. Meaning I allow users to place this utility in their own domains - and I dont know where those domains are -- and my utility allows me real-time communications between their published file - and my servers. What kind of Flash security issues will i have to work around to get this to work on most or all domains? Is this possible? How? Best regards, TJ ___ Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com To change your subscription options or search the archive: http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training http://www.figleaf.com http://training.figleaf.com ___ Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com To change your subscription options or search the archive: http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training http://www.figleaf.com http://training.figleaf.com
RE: [Flashcoders] self published.
I think what Mike was getting at was that a SWF hosted on Server A could talk to a SWF hosted on Server B via LocalConnection, provided they were running simultaneously on the same client machine. SWF A could talk to Server A, SWF A could talk to SWF B, and then SWF B could talk to Server B - kind of a bucket brigade of data transfer. For this to work, there are some Flash Player security sandbox issues that you'll have to address. Check out LocalConnection.allowDomain and LocalConnection.allowInsecureDomain. -tom -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rich Rodecker Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 9:03 PM To: Flashcoders mailing list Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] self published. ah, i think i am going to have to correct you mike. a LocalConnection is for allowint two swf's running in two separate windows on the same machine to talk to each other. On 5/30/06, Mike Britton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Someone please correct me if I'm wrong, but it would be possible to make a connection between servers using LocalConnection. You'd have to ensure your client swf was assigned an id to authenticate their application to access the data. There would have to be a security model, in other words. Once again I've never done this so take my advice with a grain of salt, but I'm sure interesting things are possible if they are sophisticated enough to drop a crossdomain.xml to give you the ability to distribute components that interact with your data. In this case I have to say Flash would make a compelling choice for your idea. Mike ___ Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com To change your subscription options or search the archive: http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training http://www.figleaf.com http://training.figleaf.com ___ Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com To change your subscription options or search the archive: http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training http://www.figleaf.com http://training.figleaf.com ___ Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com To change your subscription options or search the archive: http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training http://www.figleaf.com http://training.figleaf.com
