RE: [flexcoders] Re: Is it possible to have 2 children of viewstack visible?

2008-02-20 Thread Jim Hayes
Tink did some work on a papervision 3d cube (and other) transition
effect on states, (or possibly viewstack, can't remember) which I think
has the same attribute - you can see both states at one time.
 The source is on his site somewhere. http://www.tink.ws/blog/ , it may
give you some clues.
 
 
 
-Original Message-
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Max Frigge
Sent: 20 February 2008 04:52
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Re: Is it possible to have 2 children of
viewstack visible?
 
Hi Jason,

I tried to avoid the states because it is so much more 
comfortable to use the viewstack with tabs and so forth.
But if I would try to go the States way.. how would I 
best organize it when I have two complex components?
Should I completely remove on child and ad the other.. where
each child would be a component and the transition would 
remove the child after its animation has finished?? 
Do I get this right?

And in regards to the other answer. The WipeEffect is not
what I want. I need both children to be visible at the same 
time so that you can see the second one sliding in while the
first one is sliding out.. 

Cheers, Max
- Original Message 
From: jmfillman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 4:52:19 AM
Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Is it possible to have 2 children of viewstack
visible?
Max,

I would think that States with transition effects would be the 
easiest way to do this.

Jason
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED] ups.com mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com
, m.frigge [EMAIL PROTECTED] . wrote:

 Knock.. knock.. nobody knows this?? 
 A simple no it doesn't work would be alright too :-) ???
 
 
 --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED] ups.com
mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com , Max Frigge m.frigge@ wrote:
 
  Hi,
  
  I am trying to create a slide effect for a ViewStack. Therefor 
  I would need to have 2 children visible at the same time, so that
  you can see the second child sliding in while the first one is
  sliding out. Is that possible or am I on the wrong path?
  
  I want something like this:
  
  ?xml version=1.0 ?
  !-- containers\navigato rs\VSLinkEffects .mxml --
  
  
  mx:Parallel id=toSecond 
  mx:Move duration=400 xFrom={search. x}
 xTo={search. width} target={search} /
  mx:Move duration=400 xFrom={-custInfo. width}
 xTo={custInfo. x} target={custInfo} /
  /mx:Parallel
  
  mx:ViewStack id=myViewStack 
  borderStyle= solid 
  width=200
  creationPolicy= all
  
  mx:Canvas id=search 
  label=Search 
  mx:Label text=Search Screen/
  /mx:Canvas
  
  mx:Canvas id=custInfo 
  label=Customer Info
  mx:Label text=Customer Info/
  /mx:Canvas
  /mx:ViewStack
  
  mx:Button click=toSecond. play() label=Play Effect /
  /mx:Application
  
  
  
  
  
 
 _ _ _ _ _ _
 __
  Looking for last minute shopping deals? 
  Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. 
 http://tools. search.yahoo. com/newsearch/ category. php?
http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php? 
category=shopping
 

 
 


Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo!
Search.
http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=51734/*http:/tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearc
h/category.php?category=shopping 
 

__
This communication is from Primal Pictures Ltd., a company registered in 
England and Wales with registration No. 02622298 and registered office: 4th 
Floor, Tennyson House, 159-165 Great Portland Street, London, W1W 5PA, UK. VAT 
registration No. 648874577.

This e-mail is confidential and may be privileged. It may be read, copied and 
used only by the intended recipient. If you have received it in error, please 
contact the sender immediately by return e-mail or by telephoning +44(0)20 7637 
1010. Please then delete the e-mail and do not disclose its contents to any 
person.
This email has been scanned for Primal Pictures by the MessageLabs Email 
Security System.
__

Re: [flexcoders] Re: Is it possible to have 2 children of viewstack visible?

2008-02-20 Thread Max Frigge
Thanks for the hint. I found something that Tink calls 
PairedStackEffect.. I have no time right no to try it out
but the example shows exactly what I was looking for. 

For everyone else who is looking for this.. it can be found on
http://www.tink.ws/blog/pairedstackeffect-fade-squash/

Cheers, Max

- Original Message 
From: Jim Hayes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 9:06:49 PM
Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Re: Is it possible to have 2 children of viewstack 
visible?










  













Tink
did some work on a papervision 3d cube (and other) transition effect on states,
(or possibly viewstack, can’t remember) which I think has the same
attribute – you can see both states at one time.
 

 The source is on his site somewhere. http://www.tink. ws/blog/ , it may give 
you
some clues.
 

  
 

  
 

  
 

-Original
Message-

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ups.com
[mailto:flexcoders@ yahoogroups. com] On Behalf
Of Max Frigge

Sent: 20 February 2008 04:52

To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ups.com

Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Re: Is
it possible to have 2 children of viewstack visible?


  
 











Hi Jason,



I tried to avoid the states because it is so much more 

comfortable to use the viewstack with tabs and so forth.

But if I would try to go the States way.. how would I 

best organize it when I have two complex components?

Should I completely remove on child and ad the other.. where

each child would be a component and the transition would 

remove the child after its animation has finished?? 

Do I get this right?



And in regards to the other answer. The WipeEffect is not

what I want. I need both children to be visible at the same 

time so that you can see the second one sliding in while the

first one is sliding out.. 



Cheers, Max
 



- Original Message 

From: jmfillman [EMAIL PROTECTED] net

To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ups.com

Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 4:52:19 AM

Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Is it possible to have 2 children of viewstack
visible?
 



Max,



I would think that States with transition effects would be the 

easiest way to do this.



Jason

--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ups.com, m.frigge [EMAIL PROTECTED] . wrote:



 Knock.. knock.. nobody knows this?? 

 A simple no it doesn't work would be alright too :-) ???

 

 

 --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ups.com, Max Frigge m.frigge@ wrote:

 

  Hi,

  

  I am trying to create a slide effect for a ViewStack. Therefor 

  I would need to have 2 children visible at the same time, so that

  you can see the second child sliding in while the first one is

  sliding out. Is that possible or am I on the wrong path?

  

  I want something like this:

  

  ?xml version=1.0 ?

  !-- containers\navigato rs\VSLinkEffects .mxml --

  

  

  mx:Parallel id=toSecond 

  mx:Move duration=400 xFrom={search. x}

 xTo={search. width} target={search} /

  mx:Move duration=400 xFrom={-custInfo.
width}

 xTo={custInfo. x} target={custInfo} /

  /mx:Parallel

  

  mx:ViewStack id=myViewStack 

  borderStyle= solid 

  width=200

  creationPolicy= all

  

  mx:Canvas id=search 

  label=Search 

  mx:Label text=Search Screen/

  /mx:Canvas

  

  mx:Canvas id=custInfo 

  label=Customer Info

  mx:Label text=Customer Info/

  /mx:Canvas

  /mx:ViewStack

  

  mx:Button click=toSecond. play() label=Play
Effect /

  /mx:Application

  

  

  

  

  

 

 _ _ _ _ _ _

 __

  Looking for last minute shopping deals? 

  Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. 

 http://tools. search.yahoo. com/newsearch/
category. php?

category=shopping

 


 







  
 







  
 








Looking for last minute
shopping deals? Find
them fast with Yahoo! Search.
 










 _ _ _ _ _ _ 

This communication is from Primal Pictures Ltd., a company registered in 
England and Wales with registration No. 02622298 and registered office: 4th 
Floor, Tennyson House, 159-165 Great Portland Street, London, W1W 5PA, UK. VAT 
registration No. 648874577.



This e-mail is confidential and may be privileged. It may be read, copied and 
used only by the intended recipient. If you have received it in error, please 
contact the sender immediately by return e-mail or by telephoning +44(0)20 7637 
1010. Please then delete the e-mail and do not disclose its contents to any 
person.

This email has been scanned for Primal Pictures by the MessageLabs Email 
Security System.

 _ _ _ _ _ _ 









  







!--

#ygrp-mkp{
border:1px solid #d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:14px 0px;padding:0px 14px;}
#ygrp-mkp hr{
border:1px solid #d8d8d8;}
#ygrp-mkp #hd{
color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:bold;line-height:122%;margin:10px 0px;}
#ygrp-mkp #ads{
margin-bottom:10px;}
#ygrp-mkp .ad{
padding:0 0;}
#ygrp-mkp .ad a{

[flexcoders] Re: Is it possible to have 2 children of viewstack visible?

2008-02-19 Thread m.frigge
Knock.. knock.. nobody knows this?? 
A simple no it doesn't work would be alright too :-) ???


--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, Max Frigge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi,
 
 I am trying to create a slide effect for a ViewStack. Therefor 
 I would need to have 2 children visible at the same time, so that
 you can see the second child sliding in while the first one is
 sliding out. Is that possible or am I on the wrong path?
 
 I want something like this:
 
 ?xml version=1.0?
 !-- containers\navigators\VSLinkEffects.mxml --
 
 
 mx:Parallel id=toSecond
 mx:Move duration=400 xFrom={search.x}
xTo={search.width} target={search}/
 mx:Move duration=400 xFrom={-custInfo.width}
xTo={custInfo.x} target={custInfo}/
 /mx:Parallel
  
 mx:ViewStack id=myViewStack 
 borderStyle=solid 
 width=200
 creationPolicy=all
 
 mx:Canvas id=search 
 label=Search 
 mx:Label text=Search Screen/
 /mx:Canvas
 
 mx:Canvas id=custInfo 
 label=Customer Info
 mx:Label text=Customer Info/
 /mx:Canvas
 /mx:ViewStack
 
 mx:Button click=toSecond.play() label=Play Effect /
 /mx:Application
 
 
 
 
  

 Looking for last minute shopping deals?  
 Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. 
http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping





Re: [flexcoders] Re: Is it possible to have 2 children of viewstack visible?

2008-02-19 Thread Paul Andrews
I doubt it's possible. Having two visible doesn't really fit with the idea 
of a stack.

Why not roll your own component?

Paul
- Original Message - 
From: m.frigge [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 5:40 PM
Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Is it possible to have 2 children of viewstack 
visible?


 Knock.. knock.. nobody knows this??
 A simple no it doesn't work would be alright too :-) ???


 --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, Max Frigge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi,

 I am trying to create a slide effect for a ViewStack. Therefor
 I would need to have 2 children visible at the same time, so that
 you can see the second child sliding in while the first one is
 sliding out. Is that possible or am I on the wrong path?

 I want something like this:

 ?xml version=1.0?
 !-- containers\navigators\VSLinkEffects.mxml --


 mx:Parallel id=toSecond
 mx:Move duration=400 xFrom={search.x}
 xTo={search.width} target={search}/
 mx:Move duration=400 xFrom={-custInfo.width}
 xTo={custInfo.x} target={custInfo}/
 /mx:Parallel

 mx:ViewStack id=myViewStack
 borderStyle=solid
 width=200
 creationPolicy=all

 mx:Canvas id=search
 label=Search 
 mx:Label text=Search Screen/
 /mx:Canvas

 mx:Canvas id=custInfo
 label=Customer Info
 mx:Label text=Customer Info/
 /mx:Canvas
 /mx:ViewStack

 mx:Button click=toSecond.play() label=Play Effect /
 /mx:Application





 
 Looking for last minute shopping deals?
 Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.
 http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping





 --
 Flexcoders Mailing List
 FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
 Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com
 Yahoo! Groups Links



 



[flexcoders] Re: Is it possible to have 2 children of viewstack visible?

2008-02-19 Thread jmfillman
Max,

I would think that States with transition effects would be the 
easiest way to do this.

Jason
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, m.frigge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Knock.. knock.. nobody knows this?? 
 A simple no it doesn't work would be alright too :-) ???
 
 
 --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, Max Frigge m.frigge@ wrote:
 
  Hi,
  
  I am trying to create a slide effect for a ViewStack. Therefor 
  I would need to have 2 children visible at the same time, so that
  you can see the second child sliding in while the first one is
  sliding out. Is that possible or am I on the wrong path?
  
  I want something like this:
  
  ?xml version=1.0?
  !-- containers\navigators\VSLinkEffects.mxml --
  
  
  mx:Parallel id=toSecond
  mx:Move duration=400 xFrom={search.x}
 xTo={search.width} target={search}/
  mx:Move duration=400 xFrom={-custInfo.width}
 xTo={custInfo.x} target={custInfo}/
  /mx:Parallel
   
  mx:ViewStack id=myViewStack 
  borderStyle=solid 
  width=200
  creationPolicy=all
  
  mx:Canvas id=search 
  label=Search 
  mx:Label text=Search Screen/
  /mx:Canvas
  
  mx:Canvas id=custInfo 
  label=Customer Info
  mx:Label text=Customer Info/
  /mx:Canvas
  /mx:ViewStack
  
  mx:Button click=toSecond.play() label=Play Effect /
  /mx:Application
  
  
  
  
   
 
__
__
  Looking for last minute shopping deals?  
  Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. 
 http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?
category=shopping
 





Re: [flexcoders] Re: Is it possible to have 2 children of viewstack visible?

2008-02-19 Thread Max Frigge
Hi Jason,

I tried to avoid the states because it is so much more 
comfortable to use the viewstack with tabs and so forth.
But if I would try to go the States way.. how would I 
best organize it when I have two complex components?
Should I completely remove on child and ad the other.. where
each child would be a component and the transition would 
remove the child after its animation has finished?? 
Do I get this right?

And in regards to the other answer. The WipeEffect is not
what I want. I need both children to be visible at the same 
time so that you can see the second one sliding in while the
first one is sliding out.. 

Cheers, Max

- Original Message 
From: jmfillman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 4:52:19 AM
Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Is it possible to have 2 children of viewstack 
visible?










  



Max,



I would think that States with transition effects would be the 

easiest way to do this.



Jason

--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED] ups.com, m.frigge [EMAIL PROTECTED] . wrote:



 Knock.. knock.. nobody knows this?? 

 A simple no it doesn't work would be alright too :-) ???

 

 

 --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED] ups.com, Max Frigge m.frigge@ wrote:

 

  Hi,

  

  I am trying to create a slide effect for a ViewStack. Therefor 

  I would need to have 2 children visible at the same time, so that

  you can see the second child sliding in while the first one is

  sliding out. Is that possible or am I on the wrong path?

  

  I want something like this:

  

  ?xml version=1.0 ?

  !-- containers\navigato rs\VSLinkEffects .mxml --

  

  

  mx:Parallel id=toSecond 

  mx:Move duration=400 xFrom={search. x}

 xTo={search. width} target={search} /

  mx:Move duration=400 xFrom={-custInfo. width}

 xTo={custInfo. x} target={custInfo} /

  /mx:Parallel

   

  mx:ViewStack id=myViewStack 

  borderStyle= solid 

  width=200

  creationPolicy= all

  

  mx:Canvas id=search 

  label=Search 

  mx:Label text=Search Screen/

  /mx:Canvas

  

  mx:Canvas id=custInfo 

  label=Customer Info

  mx:Label text=Customer Info/

  /mx:Canvas

  /mx:ViewStack

  

  mx:Button click=toSecond. play() label=Play Effect /

  /mx:Application

  

  

  

  

   

 

 _ _ _ _ _ _

 __

  Looking for last minute shopping deals?  

  Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. 

 http://tools. search.yahoo. com/newsearch/ category. php?

category=shopping

 








  







!--

#ygrp-mkp{
border:1px solid #d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:14px 0px;padding:0px 14px;}
#ygrp-mkp hr{
border:1px solid #d8d8d8;}
#ygrp-mkp #hd{
color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:bold;line-height:122%;margin:10px 0px;}
#ygrp-mkp #ads{
margin-bottom:10px;}
#ygrp-mkp .ad{
padding:0 0;}
#ygrp-mkp .ad a{
color:#ff;text-decoration:none;}
--



!--

#ygrp-sponsor #ygrp-lc{
font-family:Arial;}
#ygrp-sponsor #ygrp-lc #hd{
margin:10px 0px;font-weight:bold;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;}
#ygrp-sponsor #ygrp-lc .ad{
margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;}
--



!--

#ygrp-mlmsg {font-size:13px;font-family:arial, helvetica, clean, sans-serif;}
#ygrp-mlmsg table {font-size:inherit;font:100%;}
#ygrp-mlmsg select, input, textarea {font:99% arial, helvetica, clean, 
sans-serif;}
#ygrp-mlmsg pre, code {font:115% monospace;}
#ygrp-mlmsg * {line-height:1.22em;}
#ygrp-text{
font-family:Georgia;
}
#ygrp-text p{
margin:0 0 1em 0;}
#ygrp-tpmsgs{
font-family:Arial;
clear:both;}
#ygrp-vitnav{
padding-top:10px;font-family:Verdana;font-size:77%;margin:0;}
#ygrp-vitnav a{
padding:0 1px;}
#ygrp-actbar{
clear:both;margin:25px 0;white-space:nowrap;color:#666;text-align:right;}
#ygrp-actbar .left{
float:left;white-space:nowrap;}
..bld{font-weight:bold;}
#ygrp-grft{
font-family:Verdana;font-size:77%;padding:15px 0;}
#ygrp-ft{
font-family:verdana;font-size:77%;border-top:1px solid #666;
padding:5px 0;
}
#ygrp-mlmsg #logo{
padding-bottom:10px;}

#ygrp-vital{
background-color:#e0ecee;margin-bottom:20px;padding:2px 0 8px 8px;}
#ygrp-vital #vithd{
font-size:77%;font-family:Verdana;font-weight:bold;color:#333;text-transform:uppercase;}
#ygrp-vital ul{
padding:0;margin:2px 0;}
#ygrp-vital ul li{
list-style-type:none;clear:both;border:1px solid #e0ecee;
}
#ygrp-vital ul li .ct{
font-weight:bold;color:#ff7900;float:right;width:2em;text-align:right;padding-right:.5em;}
#ygrp-vital ul li .cat{
font-weight:bold;}
#ygrp-vital a{
text-decoration:none;}

#ygrp-vital a:hover{
text-decoration:underline;}

#ygrp-sponsor #hd{
color:#999;font-size:77%;}
#ygrp-sponsor #ov{
padding:6px 13px;background-color:#e0ecee;margin-bottom:20px;}
#ygrp-sponsor #ov ul{
padding:0 0 0 8px;margin:0;}
#ygrp-sponsor #ov li{
list-style-type:square;padding:6px 0;font-size:77%;}
#ygrp-sponsor #ov li a{