Re: [Flightgear-devel] glass cockpit

2003-06-19 Thread John Wojnaroski

- Original Message -
From: paul mccann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 10:07 PM
Subject: [Flightgear-devel] glass cockpit


 Jim looks great, just like the real thing.

 1. they are ptich limit bars or symbol, you will get to stick shaker or
 stall if you pitch up to them.

 2. On the 737 the dg or compass has 7 modes
 1.  nav (full)/ looks like hsi but really showing track not heading
 and relation to stored route not vor or ils info
 2.  vor ils (full)/ looks like regular hsi and acts like one, plus
 shows magnetic heading
 3.  nav (expanded)/ same as above but you only see half the compass
 4.  vor ils (expanded)   
 5.  map /this mode shows cours line and little triagle which is the
 aircraft, also shows track not magnetic heading.
 6. center map same as above but full compass rose.
 7. plan /static map

Take a peek at www.first-day.org/jpgs for some examples. These are designed
for a full size flight deck sim so some of the detail may not be possible.
Also don't forget the five overlays for weather, airports, vortacs,
waypoints, and route ETAs on the ND

 3.  Compass does not behave like wiskey compass.  Its getting signals
 from ring laser gyro and irs. So it does not drift turn wrong way or
 display any of those things.

Same is true for A/S, altitude, vvi, etc. Everything goes thru an air data
computer that handles all those messy errors/lags you have to worry about in
lighter equipment.
Regards
JW


___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel


[Flightgear-devel] Extensions

2003-06-19 Thread Erik Hofman
Darrell Walisser wrote:
Here's a patch to simgear that implements gl function pointer lookup:
Frederic Bouvier wrote:
the patch below is required for MSVC
Could you add these definitions to extensions.hxx :
#define GL_POINT_SIZE_MIN_EXT   0x8126
#define GL_DISTANCE_ATTENUATION_EXT 0x8129


Thanks for bearing with me guys.
This is a really needed change, and I know from personal experience 
(porting FlightGear to IRIX) things can get frustrating sometimes.

These are all in CVS now.

Thanks again!

Erik



___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel


[Flightgear-devel] glass cockpit

2003-06-19 Thread Tim Jelliffe








Hi
Jim,



1). Does anyone know what the two feather
wing like icons are supposed to indicate and what they do if/when they
move (look to each side of the 15 degree pitch line in the second picture)?



They
also adjust depending on the situation. So when at altitude and high speed,
they may only be a few degrees above the horizon, so they arent always
at the 15 degrees or whatever. Someone correct me if thats wrong, but I
seem to remember this from a jumpseat ride a while
ago. In fact, if you look at

http://www.airliners.net/open.file/123982/L/

this is a 717, and the lines are blue, but you can just
see them just above the horizon.



Is
the stuff you are doing in any way related to OpenGC?
For example could their gauges be used straight on to the panel? Just wondering



Tim






___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] [PATCH] unsupported extensions on Mac OS X

2003-06-19 Thread Erik Hofman
Darrell Walisser wrote:
The point parameters extensions are unsupported in Apple's GL stack. The 
fix I've chosen is

#ifdef GL_SGIS_point_parameters

// do stuff here

#endif
Although I don't like to fix it this way (if all was correct this 
wouldn't be necessary because it adds another compile time option while 
extensions should be able to be runtime options only) I put it in CVS 
because this weekend I'll be quite busy as it stands now and I like to 
get CVS in a workable state again.

Thanks for the help Darrell.

Erik

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] is it me or hsi

2003-06-19 Thread Innis Cunningham
Hi Paul
The panel I have the instrument on is a 737 panel I am working on.If you say 
things are working fine on the 9.2 binaries version I will have a fly and 
see what happens.I fly (test) mostly in the old CVS version I have which is 
at least 3 weeks old.Because I can do development work in there and if I 
break somthing it does not matter.Why dont I up date I hear you say.Well I 
have seen that things have been a little unsetled in the CVS area lately.So 
I am woking on the theory If it an't F***ed don't fix itOnce I have time 
to spare I will update but for the time being I would just like to get a 
reasonable panel up for the 737.

Thanks for the heads up.

Cheers
Innis
paul mccann   wrote
Oh ok, but I am some what confused now because I updated from cvs last 
night after reading your message, and do not get the error your talking 
about.  You did the following
fgfs --aircraft=c310-ifr , and you still get this?  If so are using cvs 
version or 9.2?
In either case its in the xml instrument files not the c code.
You could also try the hi-res 172 panel which has the best hsi, and see if 
that works.

Paul

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
_
Get mobile Hotmail. Go to  http://ninemsn.com.au/mobilecentral/signup.asp
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] New buildings models

2003-06-19 Thread Curtis L. Olson
David Megginson writes:
 We don't distinguish between buildings and terrain, so this would also
 cause the plane to fall throught he surface of the earth when taxiing.

In plib you can mark flag objects for inclusion/exclusion from the
intersection test.  However, I don't know if the flightgear hit code
honors that flag?

Curt.
-- 
Curtis Olson   IVLab / HumanFIRST Program   FlightGear Project
Twin Citiescurt 'at' me.umn.edu curt 'at' flightgear.org
Minnesota  http://www.menet.umn.edu/~curt   http://www.flightgear.org

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] glass cockpit

2003-06-19 Thread Innis Cunningham
Thanks Jim looks great.
You wouldn't like to share the secrets of the xml code you use to get the 
compass rose to part show and the speed and altitude strips to work.Is it 
just that the strips are hidden under other layers or is there some little 
secret you have found.MATE! LOL

Cheers
Innis
 Jim Wilson wrote
Here's a rough start on the PFD for the Boeing 747-400:
http://www.spiderbark.com/fgfs/pfd01.png
http://www.spiderbark.com/fgfs/pfd02.png
_
Hotmail is now available on Australian mobile phones. Go to  
http://ninemsn.com.au/mobilecentral/signup.asp

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] glass cockpit

2003-06-19 Thread Jim Wilson
Innis Cunningham [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:

 Thanks Jim looks great.

Thanks!

 You wouldn't like to share the secrets of the xml code you use to get the 
 compass rose to part show and the speed and altitude strips to work.Is it 
 just that the strips are hidden under other layers or is there some little 
 secret you have found.MATE! LOL
 

The xml is 3D Model animation xml.  There are some modifications to the
animation code for sliding textures around that aren't quite complete yet.  If
I can clean up a few things I'll submit the latest changes to that.  Currently
this won't work with 2D panels, if that is what you meant.

Best,

Jim



___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] glass cockpit

2003-06-19 Thread Jim Wilson
paul mccann [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:

 Jim looks great, just like the real thing.

Coming from someone who would know, that's good to hear...thanks!

 1. they are ptich limit bars or symbol, you will get to stick shaker or 
 stall if you pitch up to them.

Ah ok.  We might have to hold off on animating those.  I take it the FMC
calculates their position.  Is that true?
 
 2. On the 737 the dg or compass has 7 modes
 1.  nav (full)/ looks like hsi but really showing track not heading 
 and relation to stored route not vor or ils info
 2.  vor ils (full)/ looks like regular hsi and acts like one, plus 
 shows magnetic heading
 3.  nav (expanded)/ same as above but you only see half the compass
 4.  vor ils (expanded)   
 5.  map /this mode shows cours line and little triagle which is the 
 aircraft, also shows track not magnetic heading. 
 6. center map same as above but full compass rose.
 7. plan /static map

Initially I'll probably just do the vor ils.  The rest will depend on an FMC
subsystem being coded.

 3.  Compass does not behave like wiskey compass.  Its getting signals 
 from ring laser gyro and irs. So it does not drift turn wrong way or 
 display any of those things. 

That's easy to model!  It's the errors that are the most challenging.

Best,

Jim

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] glass cockpit

2003-06-19 Thread David Culp
 1). Does anyone know what the two feather wing like icons are supposed to
 indicate and what they do if/when they move (look to each side of the 15
 degree pitch line in the second picture)?

The pitch limit symbols in the 737 are only visible when the flaps are not up.  
They indicate the pitch that would cause stick-shaker activation.

 3). And does the MAG mode in the Boeings behave like the whiskey compass in
 the Cessnas?  That is, should it be snagging up when in a 30 degree bank or
 should it pretty much work in a turn?

No. It displays heading accurately.  And, as John pointed out, everything else 
works too.  For instance, make sure you use:   
/velocities/vertical-speed-fps, converted to fpm, rather than   
/instrumentation/vertical-speed-indicator/indicated-speed-fpm for the 
vertical speed indication.

Dave Culp

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] glass cockpit

2003-06-19 Thread Jim Wilson
Tim Jelliffe [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:

 1). Does anyone know what the two feather wing like icons are supposed
 to indicate and what they do if/when they move (look to each side of the
 15 degree pitch line in the second picture)?
  
 They also adjust depending on the situation. So when at altitude and
 high speed, they may only be a few degrees above the horizon, so they
 aren't always at the 15 degrees or whatever. Someone correct me if
 that's wrong, but I seem to remember this from a jumpseat ride a while
 ago. In fact, if you look at
 http://www.airliners.net/open.file/123982/L/
 this is a 717, and the lines are blue, but you can just see them just
 above the horizon.

Yes.  It'd be great if someone wanted to start working on an FMC subsystem. 
What I'm doing here is just display level, working with the data we already have.
  
 Is the stuff you are doing in any way related to OpenGC? For example
 could their gauges be used straight on to the panel? Just wondering
  

Well, I did borrowed the rose from a screenshot of OpenGC.  Other than that,
OpenGC is actually a much more powerful application that I'm not attempting to
emulate.  I've only looked at the code a little, and haven't set it up, but
IIRC the digital display textures are generated dynamically.  What I'm doing
here is a lot simpler (gimp and ac3d).

That said, there will be an engine display, and fortunately the 747 one looks
easier to do this way than the one in OpenGC.

Best,

Jim

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] glass cockpit

2003-06-19 Thread Jim Wilson
David Culp [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:

  1). Does anyone know what the two feather wing like icons are supposed to
  indicate and what they do if/when they move (look to each side of the 15
  degree pitch line in the second picture)?
 
 The pitch limit symbols in the 737 are only visible when the flaps are not up.  
 They indicate the pitch that would cause stick-shaker activation.
 
  3). And does the MAG mode in the Boeings behave like the whiskey compass in
  the Cessnas?  That is, should it be snagging up when in a 30 degree bank or
  should it pretty much work in a turn?
 
 No. It displays heading accurately.  And, as John pointed out, everything else 
 works too.  For instance, make sure you use:   
 /velocities/vertical-speed-fps, converted to fpm, rather than   
 /instrumentation/vertical-speed-indicator/indicated-speed-fpm for the 
 vertical speed indication.

Yes, I got that one wrong too.  How about the backup instrumentation?

Best,

Jim

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] buildings and textures and blender2.25

2003-06-19 Thread Andy Ross
Jim Wilson wrote:
 Shading is done per object (normals generated on the fly).  If you
 need a square edge, split the adjacent sides into individual objects.
 For example on the P-51D and AFAIK Lee's models, the blunt edges of
 the control surfaces (e.g. flaps, ailerons) are separate objects.

That reminds me.  One of the things I need to think about porting over
into plib* is some code I wrote that automatically splits vertices at
sharp edges.  It was a royal pain to get right, but it actually works
quite well for arbitrary meshes.

Right now, it works on a very different mesh representation than plib
uses, and I'm not sure what the best way to integrate it would be.

Andy

* My game project is slowing down, and I'm actually looking
  for a job again.**

** The difficulty of which is proving to be a real shock.  The last
   time I was in the market was 1998 in San Francisco, when you had to
   actually screen your calls to avoid talking to recruiters.
   Portland in 2003 isn't nearly as forgiving...

-- 
Andrew J. RossBeyond the OrdinaryPlausibility Productions
Sole Proprietor   Beneath the Infinite   Hillsboro, OR
  Experience... the Plausible?



___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] [PATCH] unsupported extensions on Mac

2003-06-19 Thread Darrell Walisser
It turns out that there is a better way to fix it. Apple supports the 
ARB version of point parameters: GL_ARB_point_parameters. I think it 
takes the same arguments, but to different function names, and uses 
different constant names (though in actuality, they have the same 
value).

http://oss.sgi.com/projects/ogl-sample/registry/ARB/point_parameters.txt

Here's a new patch, that takes this into account:

http://homepage.mac.com/walisser/downloads/flightgearpointparams2.diff

I didn't notice any change with or without this extension enabled (can 
we get a screen shot up of what the runway lights are supposed to look 
like?). I don't know if it's being used incorrectly or if it is 
unsupported somehow in the hardware (GL_ARB_point_paramters is reported 
in the extensions string, btw).

On Thursday, June 19, 2003, at 09:12  AM, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Darrell Walisser wrote:
The point parameters extensions are unsupported in Apple's GL stack. 
The
fix I've chosen is

#ifdef GL_SGIS_point_parameters

// do stuff here

#endif
Although I don't like to fix it this way (if all was correct this
wouldn't be necessary because it adds another compile time option while
extensions should be able to be runtime options only) I put it in CVS
because this weekend I'll be quite busy as it stands now and I like to
get CVS in a workable state again.
Thanks for the help Darrell.

Erik


___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel


[Flightgear-devel] [PATCH] larcsim multiply-defined global var

2003-06-19 Thread Darrell Walisser
Yeah, it's the old multiply-defined global problem again. Here's the 
quick fix (just extern'd one of the definitions):

http://homepage.mac.com/walisser/downloads/flightgearlarcsim.diff

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] glass cockpit

2003-06-19 Thread Innis Cunningham


Hi Jim unfortunately that is what I meant.

cheers
Innis
 Jim Wilson  wrote
 Currently this won't work with 2D panels, if that is what you meant.
Best,

Jim



___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
_
Get mobile Hotmail. Go to  http://ninemsn.com.au/mobilecentral/signup.asp
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel


[Flightgear-devel] [PATCH] Instruments/hsi2.xml: fix path

2003-06-19 Thread Melchior FRANZ

diff -u -p -r1.5 hsi2.xml
--- hsi2.xml20 Apr 2003 10:05:20 -  1.5
+++ hsi2.xml19 Jun 2003 15:54:27 -
@@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ Started 24-7-01 by Timothy Gale
typeswitch/type
layer
 condition
- property alias=../../../../../../params/nav-from-flag/
+ property alias=../../../../../params/nav-from-flag/
 /condition
 nameFROM flag/name
 texture

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel


[Flightgear-devel] [PATCH] Instruments/markerbeacon.xml: fix outer marker control light

2003-06-19 Thread Melchior FRANZ
I guess that everyone has wondered about the outer marker control
light already. It has been on since 2003/03/09. Didn't blink since
then.  :-)

m.



diff -u -p -r1.2 markerbeacon.xml
--- markerbeacon.xml9 Mar 2003 03:41:48 -   1.2
+++ markerbeacon.xml19 Jun 2003 16:43:02 -
@@ -45,11 +45,11 @@ properties' values.
namelamp/name
typeswitch/type
layer
+   condition
+property/radios/marker-beacon/outer/property
+   /condition
nameon/name
texture
-condition
- property/radios/marker-beacon/outer/property
-/condition
 pathAircraft/Instruments/Textures/led.rgb/path
 x10.5/x1
 y10.75/y1

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel


[Flightgear-devel] [PATCH] c310-{electrical,ifr-set}.xml: fix adf/dme forc310{,-ifr,-3d}

2003-06-19 Thread Melchior FRANZ
I'm not sure if I connected adf and dme to the correct bus,
but it's time that c310s have them working. There was a temporary
workaround in c310-ifr-set.xml, but not for the c310-3d
(= c310u3a-3d), the plain c310 and eventually others.

m.



Index: c310-ifr-set.xml
===
RCS file: /var/cvs/FlightGear-0.9/data/Aircraft/c310-ifr-set.xml,v
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -p -r1.5 c310-ifr-set.xml
--- c310-ifr-set.xml20 Apr 2003 10:05:20 -  1.5
+++ c310-ifr-set.xml19 Jun 2003 17:20:29 -
@@ -14,13 +14,6 @@ March 2002 Jim Wilson, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  sim

-!-- This is temporary fix to electric system till adf and dme are added to c310 --
-  systems
-electrical
-  pathAircraft/c172/c172-electrical.xml/path
-/electrical
-  /systems
-
   descriptionCessna 310 with IFR panel/description

   panel
Index: c310/c310-electrical.xml
===
RCS file: /var/cvs/FlightGear-0.9/data/Aircraft/c310/c310-electrical.xml,v
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -p -r1.4 c310-electrical.xml
--- c310/c310-electrical.xml1 Apr 2003 15:46:52 -   1.4
+++ c310/c310-electrical.xml19 Jun 2003 17:20:29 -
@@ -72,6 +72,8 @@
   output
 nameInstrument Power/name
 prop/systems/electrical/outputs/instr-ignition-switch/prop
+prop/systems/electrical/outputs/adf/prop
+prop/systems/electrical/outputs/dme/prop
   /output

   output

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel


[Flightgear-devel] [PATCH] Instruments/hsi.xml: unbreak it :-)

2003-06-19 Thread Melchior FRANZ
The reported breakage of the hsi was caused by wrong lower limits.

m.


Index: hsi.xml
===
RCS file: /var/cvs/FlightGear-0.9/data/Aircraft/Instruments/hsi.xml,v
retrieving revision 1.8
diff -u -p -r1.8 hsi.xml
--- hsi.xml	9 Mar 2003 03:41:48 -	1.8
+++ hsi.xml	19 Jun 2003 18:04:33 -
@@ -93,14 +93,14 @@ Started 24-7-01 by Timothy Gale
 transformation
 typerotation/type
 property/orientation/heading-magnetic-deg/property
-min0.0/min
-max360/max
+min-360.0/min
+max360.0/max
 scale-1.0/scale
/transformation
transformation
 typerotation/type
 property/radios/nav[0]/radials/selected-deg/property
-min0.0/min
+min-360.0/min
 max360.0/max
 scale1.0/scale
/transformation
@@ -158,14 +158,14 @@ Started 24-7-01 by Timothy Gale
  transformation
  typerotation/type
  property/orientation/heading-magnetic-deg/property
- min0.0/min
- max360/max
+ min-360.0/min
+ max360.0/max
  scale-1.0/scale
 /transformation
 transformation
  typerotation/type
  property/radios/nav[0]/radials/selected-deg/property
- min0.0/min
+ min-360.0/min
  max360.0/max
  scale1.0/scale
 /transformation
@@ -187,15 +187,15 @@ Started 24-7-01 by Timothy Gale
 transformation
 typerotation/type
 property/orientation/heading-magnetic-deg/property
-min0.0/min
-max360/max
+min-360.0/min
+max360.0/max
 scale-1.0/scale
/transformation
 transformation
 typerotation/type
 property/radios/nav[0]/radials/selected-deg/property
-min0.0/min
-max360/max
+min-360.0/min
+max360.0/max
 scale1.0/scale
/transformation
transformation
@@ -223,10 +223,9 @@ Started 24-7-01 by Timothy Gale
transformations
 transformation
  typerotation/type
- !--set45/offset--
  property/radios/kr-87/outputs/needle-deg/property
- min-360/min
- max360/max
+ min-360.0/min
+ max360.0/max
 /transformation
 transformation
  typex-shift/type
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel


[Flightgear-devel] Re: [PATCH] Instruments/hsi.xml: unbreak it :-)

2003-06-19 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* Melchior FRANZ -- Thursday 19 June 2003 20:07:
 The reported breakage of the hsi was caused by wrong lower limits.

The patch does not fix the heading bug. If you lock the
AP on heading, it doesn't head to the bug. The hsi2.xml uses
/instrumentation/heading-indicator/indicated-heading-deg instead
of /orientation/heading-magnetic-deg, and works better. Both,
however, do not yield exact behavior, though. Even the hsi2
is slightly off. Ideas?

m. 

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel


[Flightgear-devel] Windsock Model

2003-06-19 Thread WillyB
I asked this on the Users list, probably the wrong one to be asking on ;)
Or maybe it's already been answered somewhere but I didn't see it

In the 0.9.2 release there is a windsock model with an xml file included...

/FG-0.9.2/data/Models/Airport/windsock.ac
/FG-0.9.2/data/Models/Airport/windsock.rgb
/FG-0.9.2/data/Models/Airport/windsock.xml

When I turn on the --wind or the --random-wind I can't really tell from inside 
the sim where the wind is coming from exactly, and know that a windsock will 
help with this.

Do I place a property=/Models/Airport/windsock.xml somewhere in the 
options.xml or preferences.xml ?

Like maybe in this section of preferences.xml ?

 !-- Environment --
 environment

I have not been able to get the windsock to work at all as far as making it 
turn with the wind, I can get it to show up by putting it in the stg file and 
dir that file is in, but no idea how to make the xml for it do what it's made 
to do.

Any help or insight will be appreciated :)
TIA

Re's

WillyB


___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel


[Flightgear-devel] Re: Windsock Model

2003-06-19 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* WillyB -- Thursday 19 June 2003 22:49:
 Do I place a property=/Models/Airport/windsock.xml somewhere in the 
 options.xml or preferences.xml ?

You put it in your personal preferences.xml file, like so:

PropertyList
models
model
nameWindsock KSFO/name
pathModels/Airport/windsock.xml/path
longitude-deg type=double-122.3606/longitude-deg
latitude-deg type=double37.6136/latitude-deg
elevation-ft type=double0/elevation-ft
/model
/models
/PropertyList

m.

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: Windsock Model

2003-06-19 Thread WillyB
Thanks Melchior...  I 'almost' tried something similar to that!
I think I was confusing it beyond it's confusion factor and then not dividing 
by 3.65 brain cells ;)

Re's

WillyB


On Thursday 19 June 2003 14:03, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
 * WillyB -- Thursday 19 June 2003 22:49:
  Do I place a property=/Models/Airport/windsock.xml somewhere in the
  options.xml or preferences.xml ?

 You put it in your personal preferences.xml file, like so:

 PropertyList
 models
 model
 nameWindsock KSFO/name
 pathModels/Airport/windsock.xml/path
 longitude-deg type=double-122.3606/longitude-deg
 latitude-deg type=double37.6136/latitude-deg
 elevation-ft type=double0/elevation-ft
 /model
 /models
 /PropertyList

 m.


 ___
 Flightgear-devel mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel


___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel


[Flightgear-devel] Mac OS X binary is up

2003-06-19 Thread Darrell Walisser
http://homepage.mac.com/walisser/.cv/walisser/Public/FlightGear/fgfs- 
0.9.2-06.19.03.gz-link.gz

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel


[Flightgear-devel] Re: Windsock Model

2003-06-19 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* WillyB -- Friday 20 June 2003 00:59:
 you said 'personal preferences.xml'

  $ fgfs --config=/your/personal/preferences.xml

or

  $ cat ~/.fgfsrc
  --config=/your/personal/preferences.xml

  $ fgfs


(mine is called ~/.fgfs/preferences.xml. I have some other
personal fgfs config stuff in the hidden ~/.fgfs/ dir as well.)

m.

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel


[Flightgear-devel] Re: Windsock Model

2003-06-19 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* WillyB -- Friday 20 June 2003 00:59:
elevation-ft type=double1042.34/elevation-ft
^^  ^^

elevation-ft is in =feet=. Try this:

  elevation-ft type=double3420/elevation-ft

m.

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: Windsock Model

2003-06-19 Thread WillyB
Ok... I made a my_preferences.xml in the data dir.

On the command line:
/home/willyb/Games/FG/runfg-9.2.sh 
--config=/home/willyb/Games/FG-0.9.2/data/my_preferences.xml

-- excerpt from console --
  log-level
Initializing scenery subsystem
Adding model Windsock KIGM
  Loading stars from /home/willyb/Games/FG-0.9.2/data/Astro/stars
  Loaded 850 stars
initializing cloud layers
-- end excerpt --

so from that I can see that it's reading my_preferences.xml
But it doesn't show up :/

Not sure what to do now except ask again.

this I doubt matters.. my scenery dir is not anywhere near the data dir.. I 
use an .sh script to load fgfs and it gives the peremeters for
--fg-root=/where/fg-data/directory/is
--fg-scenery=/where/scenery/is

I'll try some other stuff also while I wait to see a reply

Re's
WillyB




On Thursday 19 June 2003 16:10, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
 * WillyB -- Friday 20 June 2003 00:59:
  you said 'personal preferences.xml'

   $ fgfs --config=/your/personal/preferences.xml

 or

   $ cat ~/.fgfsrc
   --config=/your/personal/preferences.xml

   $ fgfs


 (mine is called ~/.fgfs/preferences.xml. I have some other
 personal fgfs config stuff in the hidden ~/.fgfs/ dir as well.)

 m.

 ___
 Flightgear-devel mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel


___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel


[Flightgear-devel] Question about Mac OS X, FG and latest SimGear

2003-06-19 Thread Ima Sudonim
I am having a problem with SimGear when building flightgear.

in simgear/screen/extensions.cxx

I need to wrap the #ifdef lines within

#ifndef __APPLE__
#ifndef WIN32
#include dlfcn.h
#else
#include windows.h
#endif
#endif //__APPLE__  
Otherwise I get the message that
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../simgear -I../..  
-I/Users/ima/Desktop/FlightGear/fgdev9.2/include  -g -O2 -D_REENTRANT 
-c -o extensions.o `test -f 'extensions.cxx' || echo './'`extensions.cxx
extensions.cxx:28:19: dlfcn.h: No such file or directory
make[3]: *** [extensions.o] Error 1
make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: *** [all] Error 2
make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1

So I downloaded dlcompat, but I don't see dlfcn.h anywhere on my 
system. Is this file required now for flightgear on macos x?

With the #ifdefs out of the picture, simgear builds fine, as does fg.

Fink shows the following dlcompat loaded:
Information about 1159 packages read in 1 seconds.
 i   dlcompat 20021117-1   Dynamic loading compatibility library
 i   dlcompat-shlibs  20021117-1   shared libraries for dlcompat
but I still don't see dlfcn.h.

Any ideas what I'm doing wrong?  Using mac os x (10.2) with developer 
tools and plib/simgear and fg/data of Thursday 17:00 GMT.  I'd rather 
not separate my local source from the cvs servers any more than 
absolutely necessary

thanks, Ima

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: Windsock Model

2003-06-19 Thread WillyB
Whoops!

I didn't see this post until after I posted the last one...

Feet NOT Meters ... duh :/

So it was there all along, just a few 1000 feet under the ground!

Thanks Melchior

Here's a screenshot if anyone cares to have a look.
http://24.121.17.106/fgfs/scenery/fgfs-windsock.png

Many thanks for the help here Melchior

Re's
WillyB


On Thursday 19 June 2003 16:35, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
 * WillyB -- Friday 20 June 2003 00:59:
 elevation-ft type=double1042.34/elevation-ft

 ^^  ^^

 elevation-ft is in =feet=. Try this:

   elevation-ft type=double3420/elevation-ft

 m.

 ___
 Flightgear-devel mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel


___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: Windsock Model

2003-06-19 Thread Frederic Bouvier
WillyB wrote:

 Here's a screenshot if anyone cares to have a look.
 http://24.121.17.106/fgfs/scenery/fgfs-windsock.png

I always found that there is something odd visually
with the winsock. It seems that the normals are inside
and not outside.

David, do you still have the blender model ? If you 
can't fix it, could you send it to me ?

-Fred




___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel