Re: [Flightgear-devel] My 172P work for appraisal
On Monday 20 December 2004 17:04, Dave Martin wrote: On Monday 20 Dec 2004 09:58, Martin Spott wrote: Dave Martin wrote: Here we are: (screenshots) Well, after looking at the first shot: http://www.cyfinity.com/fgfs/c172p1.jpg I thought: Oh, how nice, someone added a C150 to the hangar, but after looking at the last one: http://www.cyfinity.com/fgfs/c172p7.jpg I am pretty much pleased ;-) Thanks, Martin. As it happens I'd quite like to make a 150/152 model from scratch as a fairly high-poly example which would be 'comfortably' realistic. However, I'm watching the development of the PA28-161 for now so I can get some tips on setting up 3d panels etc. I have a very good 3-view for a C-185, if anyone wants to do one of those. LeeE ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
Re: [Flightgear-devel] My 172P work for appraisal
Dave Martin wrote: Here we are: (screenshots) Well, after looking at the first shot: http://www.cyfinity.com/fgfs/c172p1.jpg I thought: Oh, how nice, someone added a C150 to the hangar, but after looking at the last one: http://www.cyfinity.com/fgfs/c172p7.jpg I am pretty much pleased ;-) Thanks, Martin. -- Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are ! -- ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
Re: [Flightgear-devel] My 172P work for appraisal
On Monday 20 Dec 2004 09:58, Martin Spott wrote: Dave Martin wrote: Here we are: (screenshots) Well, after looking at the first shot: http://www.cyfinity.com/fgfs/c172p1.jpg I thought: Oh, how nice, someone added a C150 to the hangar, but after looking at the last one: http://www.cyfinity.com/fgfs/c172p7.jpg I am pretty much pleased ;-) Thanks, Martin. As it happens I'd quite like to make a 150/152 model from scratch as a fairly high-poly example which would be 'comfortably' realistic. However, I'm watching the development of the PA28-161 for now so I can get some tips on setting up 3d panels etc. ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
Re: [Flightgear-devel] My 172P work for appraisal
On Sunday 19 Dec 2004 20:54, Roy Vegard Ovesen wrote: On Sunday 19 December 2004 19:46, Dave Martin wrote: Any feedback you can give me is greatly appreciated :-) The Compass is invisible from outside. You can fix this by adding a name tag to the part where the compass model gets included, and then adding it to the bottom of the InteriorGroup group, around line 330 in Models/c172p.xml. When you can see the compass from the outside you will see that it floats in mid air over the glareshield, so you might want to move it down a bit. Also the instruments are floating a few cm from the panel, this is evident when you look at it at an angle. You can remove the PanelInstruments and ControlsGroup warnings if you remove all references to PanelInstruments in Models/c172p.xml. It is still possible to see the instruments through the nav- and beacon-lights. But I guess this is something that has to be fixed in the code. Cheers, I'll have a look at those points. I noticed the instrument lights showing through but they don't have a texture so my trick with the panel wont work. :( Also of note; the panel being too far out means that I've totally mucked up my geometries :-S Oh well, my own fault ;) ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
Re: [Flightgear-devel] My 172P work for appraisal
On Sunday 19 December 2004 22:32, Dave Martin wrote: Also of note; the panel being too far out means that I've totally mucked up my geometries :-S Oh well, my own fault ;) Note that I'm talking about the 2d instrument panel that is included, _not_ the panel in the 3d model. It should be quite easy to get the x-coordinate right for the 2d instrument panel. Simply set it to the same as the x-coordinate for any vertex on the panel face. -- Roy Vegard Ovesen ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
RE: [Flightgear-devel] My 172P work for appraisal
Screen shot? :-) Jon If you'd like to try the c172p you can grab it here: http://www.cyfinity.com/fgfs/c172p.tar.gz (extract in your /data/Aircraft folder but back-up your existing 172p first! ;) ) Any feedback you can give me is greatly appreciated :-) ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
Re: [Flightgear-devel] My 172P work for appraisal
On Sunday 19 Dec 2004 21:36, Roy Vegard Ovesen wrote: On Sunday 19 December 2004 22:32, Dave Martin wrote: Also of note; the panel being too far out means that I've totally mucked up my geometries :-S Oh well, my own fault ;) Note that I'm talking about the 2d instrument panel that is included, _not_ the panel in the 3d model. It should be quite easy to get the x-coordinate right for the 2d instrument panel. Simply set it to the same as the x-coordinate for any vertex on the panel face. I follow you; but the reason that the geometry is wrong is due to the instrument sizes (ie: they appeared larger when closer to you). So I've repositioned them all anyway - looks better to my eye now and a comparison with my large-scale photo of my friends 'P' cockpit looks pretty accurate. :-) I've changed the wingtips slightly now (the nav-lights will need totally re-doing but that can wait till the landing+taxi lights get started). I've uploaded the fixes: http://www.cyfinity.com/fgfs/c172p.tar.gz On Sunday 19 Dec 2004 22:03, Jon Berndt wrote: Screen shot? :-) Jon Coming up shortly :) ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
Re: [Flightgear-devel] My 172P work for appraisal
On Sunday 19 Dec 2004 22:03, Jon Berndt wrote: Screen shot? :-) Jon Here we are: (screenshots) http://www.cyfinity.com/fgfs/c172p1.jpg http://www.cyfinity.com/fgfs/c172p2.jpg http://www.cyfinity.com/fgfs/c172p3.jpg http://www.cyfinity.com/fgfs/c172p4.jpg http://www.cyfinity.com/fgfs/c172p5.jpg http://www.cyfinity.com/fgfs/c172p6.jpg http://www.cyfinity.com/fgfs/c172p7.jpg But you really need to try the model to see how I've really changed it. ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
Re: [Flightgear-devel] My 172P work for appraisal
On Sunday 19 Dec 2004 21:36, Roy Vegard Ovesen wrote: On Sunday 19 December 2004 22:32, Dave Martin wrote: Also of note; the panel being too far out means that I've totally mucked up my geometries :-S Oh well, my own fault ;) Note that I'm talking about the 2d instrument panel that is included, _not_ the panel in the 3d model. It should be quite easy to get the x-coordinate right for the 2d instrument panel. Simply set it to the same as the x-coordinate for any vertex on the panel face. Mean to say that I also made the compass visible; you're instructions were great, I'd never have figured out how to do it ;) I've also slightly embedded to compass into the dash as it looks quite realistic like that as if it is sat on the fairing. ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
RE: [Flightgear-devel] My 172P work for appraisal
Pretty! Jon -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dave Martin Sent: Sunday, December 19, 2004 5:03 PM To: FlightGear developers discussions Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] My 172P work for appraisal On Sunday 19 Dec 2004 22:03, Jon Berndt wrote: Screen shot? :-) Jon Here we are: (screenshots) http://www.cyfinity.com/fgfs/c172p1.jpg http://www.cyfinity.com/fgfs/c172p2.jpg http://www.cyfinity.com/fgfs/c172p3.jpg http://www.cyfinity.com/fgfs/c172p4.jpg http://www.cyfinity.com/fgfs/c172p5.jpg http://www.cyfinity.com/fgfs/c172p6.jpg http://www.cyfinity.com/fgfs/c172p7.jpg But you really need to try the model to see how I've really changed it. ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
Re: [Flightgear-devel] My 172P work for appraisal
That will be nice. Ampere On December 19, 2004 05:03 pm, Jon Berndt wrote: Screen shot? :-) Jon If you'd like to try the c172p you can grab it here: http://www.cyfinity.com/fgfs/c172p.tar.gz (extract in your /data/Aircraft folder but back-up your existing 172p first! ;) ) Any feedback you can give me is greatly appreciated :-) ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
