Re: [Flightgear-devel] Latest CVS Aborts
I'll wrap up the new traffic files tonight. I the mean time, I've add small tar file containing the necessary traffic files. Should work, but haven't had much chance of testing it. Cheers, Durk On Friday 23 July 2004 07:21, Frederic Bouvier wrote: Jonathan Polley wrote: I just updated tonight and FlightGear no longer runs on the Mac. As of last night, everything ran just file, but after updating everything (SimGear, FlightGear, and base packages) I get an abort. The gdb backtrace is: ... traffic-temp.tar.gz Description: application/tgz ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] Latest CVS Aborts
Jonathan Polley wrote: I just updated tonight and FlightGear no longer runs on the Mac. As of last night, everything ran just file, but after updating everything (SimGear, FlightGear, and base packages) I get an abort. Oops, sorry all. This is caused by me not including a bunch of TrafficManager related files to the base package. Although it probably shouldn't trigger a segmentation fault, it is my bad and is fixed in CVS now. Erik ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
RE: [Flightgear-devel] Latest CVS Aborts
Erik Hofman Sent: 23 July 2004 08:52 To: FlightGear developers discussions Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Latest CVS Aborts Jonathan Polley wrote: I just updated tonight and FlightGear no longer runs on the Mac. As of last night, everything ran just file, but after updating everything (SimGear, FlightGear, and base packages) I get an abort. Oops, sorry all. This is caused by me not including a bunch of TrafficManager related files to the base package. Although it probably shouldn't trigger a segmentation fault, it is my bad and is fixed in CVS now. As of 1000hrs this morning, it's still broken for Cygwin: Adding subsystem Traffic Manager Unknown exception in the main loop. Aborting... Regards, Vivian ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] Latest CVS Aborts
Vivian Meazza wrote: Erik Hofman Sent: 23 July 2004 08:52 To: FlightGear developers discussions Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Latest CVS Aborts Jonathan Polley wrote: I just updated tonight and FlightGear no longer runs on the Mac. As of last night, everything ran just file, but after updating everything (SimGear, FlightGear, and base packages) I get an abort. Oops, sorry all. This is caused by me not including a bunch of TrafficManager related files to the base package. Although it probably shouldn't trigger a segmentation fault, it is my bad and is fixed in CVS now. As of 1000hrs this morning, it's still broken for Cygwin: Adding subsystem Traffic Manager Unknown exception in the main loop. Aborting... Could you post a gdb backtrace ? -Fred ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
RE: [Flightgear-devel] Latest CVS Aborts
Frederic Bouvier asked Sent: 23 July 2004 11:14 To: FlightGear developers discussions Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Latest CVS Aborts Vivian Meazza wrote: Erik Hofman Sent: 23 July 2004 08:52 To: FlightGear developers discussions Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Latest CVS Aborts Jonathan Polley wrote: I just updated tonight and FlightGear no longer runs on the Mac. As of last night, everything ran just file, but after updating everything (SimGear, FlightGear, and base packages) I get an abort. Oops, sorry all. This is caused by me not including a bunch of TrafficManager related files to the base package. Although it probably shouldn't trigger a segmentation fault, it is my bad and is fixed in CVS now. As of 1000hrs this morning, it's still broken for Cygwin: Adding subsystem Traffic Manager Unknown exception in the main loop. Aborting... Could you post a gdb backtrace ? Br, I've just reverted to 0.9.5-pre1. Standby. Regards, Vivian ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
RE: [Flightgear-devel] Latest CVS Aborts
I wrote Sent: 23 July 2004 11:49 To: 'FlightGear developers discussions' Subject: RE: [Flightgear-devel] Latest CVS Aborts Frederic Bouvier asked Sent: 23 July 2004 11:14 To: FlightGear developers discussions Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Latest CVS Aborts Vivian Meazza wrote: Erik Hofman Sent: 23 July 2004 08:52 To: FlightGear developers discussions Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Latest CVS Aborts Jonathan Polley wrote: I just updated tonight and FlightGear no longer runs on the Mac. As of last night, everything ran just file, but after updating everything (SimGear, FlightGear, and base packages) I get an abort. Oops, sorry all. This is caused by me not including a bunch of TrafficManager related files to the base package. Although it probably shouldn't trigger a segmentation fault, it is my bad and is fixed in CVS now. As of 1000hrs this morning, it's still broken for Cygwin: Adding subsystem Traffic Manager Unknown exception in the main loop. Aborting... Could you post a gdb backtrace ? Br, I've just reverted to 0.9.5-pre1. Standby. I've re-downloaded the current cvs. Here's the backtrace (gdb) backtrace #0 0x77e75a3f in KERNEL32!IsBadWritePtr () from /cygdrive/c/WINDOWS/system32/kernel32.dll #1 0x0013 in ?? () #2 0x0022d634 in ?? () #3 0x0012 in ?? () #4 0x0022d000 in ?? () #5 0x0022d000 in ?? () #6 0x0022bfec in ?? () #7 0x63656a62 in ?? () #8 0x0022f090 in ?? () #9 0x77e94809 in SetThreadExecutionState () from /cygdrive/c/WINDOWS/system32/kernel32.dll #10 0x610a92ed in cygwin1!__getreent () from /usr/bin/cygwin1.dll #11 0x0008 in ?? () #12 0x0022c048 in ?? () #13 0x610a9387 in cygwin1!__getreent () from /usr/bin/cygwin1.dll #14 0x0001 in ?? () #15 0x0022c120 in ?? () #16 0x0022d634 in ?? () (gdb) Can't say that it means anything to me! Is it any good to you, or can I do something else? Regards, Vivian ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] Latest CVS Aborts
Vivian Meazza wrote: I've re-downloaded the current cvs. Here's the backtrace ... Can't say that it means anything to me! Is it any good to you, or can I do something else? It looks like useless garbage, sorry. Do you run fg with --log-level=bulk or whatever is the most verbose ( I don't remember right now ) ? -Fred ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] Latest CVS Aborts
Frederic Bouvier wrote: Vivian Meazza wrote: I've re-downloaded the current cvs. Here's the backtrace ... Can't say that it means anything to me! Is it any good to you, or can I do something else? It looks like useless garbage, sorry. Do you run fg with --log-level=bulk or whatever is the most verbose ( I don't remember right now ) ? You have to compile with -g to include debugging symbols so that the back trace makes sense. That said, the very few times I've tried to run gdb with flightgear on windows, I was never very successful. Curt. -- Curtis Olsonhttp://www.flightgear.org/~curt HumanFIRST Program http://www.humanfirst.umn.edu/ FlightGear Project http://www.flightgear.org Unique text:2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
RE: [Flightgear-devel] Latest CVS Aborts
Curtis L. Olson writes: You have to compile with -g to include debugging symbols so that the back trace makes sense. That said, the very few times I've tried to run gdb with flightgear on windows, I was never very successful. GDB might have some problems on 95,98 and WinMe, but runs fine on any WindowsNT variant. Of course as Curt says you do need to compile with the -g switch for debugging I usually use 'CXXFLAGS = -g -O2' which IIRC is the default setting for our configure scripts Norman ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
RE: [Flightgear-devel] Latest CVS Aborts
Norman Vine wrote Sent: 23 July 2004 14:15 To: FlightGear developers discussions Subject: RE: [Flightgear-devel] Latest CVS Aborts Curtis L. Olson writes: You have to compile with -g to include debugging symbols so that the back trace makes sense. That said, the very few times I've tried to run gdb with flightgear on windows, I was never very successful. GDB might have some problems on 95,98 and WinMe, but runs fine on any WindowsNT variant. Of course as Curt says you do need to compile with the -g switch for debugging I usually use 'CXXFLAGS = -g -O2' which IIRC is the default setting for our configure scripts Norman I'd forgotten the -g. I'll re-download, recompile and try again. Regards, Vivian ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
RE: [Flightgear-devel] Latest CVS Aborts
Frederic Bouvier asked Sent: 23 July 2004 13:51 To: FlightGear developers discussions Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Latest CVS Aborts Vivian Meazza wrote: I've re-downloaded the current cvs. Here's the backtrace ... Can't say that it means anything to me! Is it any good to you, or can I do something else? It looks like useless garbage, sorry. Do you run fg with --log-level=bulk or whatever is the most verbose ( I don't remember right now ) ? --log-level=info - second most verbose Regards, Vivian ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
RE: [Flightgear-devel] Latest CVS Aborts
I wrote Sent: 23 July 2004 14:39 To: 'FlightGear developers discussions' Subject: RE: [Flightgear-devel] Latest CVS Aborts Frederic Bouvier asked Sent: 23 July 2004 13:51 To: FlightGear developers discussions Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Latest CVS Aborts Vivian Meazza wrote: I've re-downloaded the current cvs. Here's the backtrace ... Can't say that it means anything to me! Is it any good to you, or can I do something else? It looks like useless garbage, sorry. Do you run fg with --log- level=bulk or whatever is the most verbose ( I don't remember right now ) ? --log-level=info - second most verbose Latest cvs download compiled successfully under Cygwin, by the usual expedient of deleting all old files and starting over. Tedious, but it worked. I have no idea what was wrong, but it looks like a file wasn't being updated by cvs correctly. Once again thanks for your help Regards, Vivian ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] Latest CVS Aborts
Jonathan Polley wrote: I just updated tonight and FlightGear no longer runs on the Mac. As of last night, everything ran just file, but after updating everything (SimGear, FlightGear, and base packages) I get an abort. The gdb backtrace is: ... It is the same for everybody until some files required by the TrafficManager are put in CVS. -Fred ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
