[Flightgear-devel] Re: PA24-250 model under development

2005-12-22 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* Vivian Meazza -- Thursday 22 December 2005 10:13:
 Blender is clever, but almost impossible to use.

Oh, sure. That must be why the Concorde, the Bo105 and several others were
done with Blender. This opinion is common under people who didn't have
the patience to learn a new interface. Yes, it's overwhelming at first,
but it's *very* efficient once you understood it. Reading one or two
tutorials (plenty available on the net) and asking a few questions here
or in our IRC channel should be enough to grok Blender.

Blender is literally a professional tool, not only in the buzzword sense.
It was written and used by a graphics studio that did commercial animations
for advertisement purposes and such. Then it was freed and is now GPL'ed.
It is fully scriptable in Python and there are scripts available for
specific FlightGear development purposes. This here[1] writes FlightGear
animation XML fragments and whole XML animation files. There are many
other scripts available, too. You can directly ray-trace your model if
you like, import/export numerous formats, and do lots of other fancy
things with it.



 To get going quickly, while getting acceptable results I would recommend
 AC3D. The $40 or so it costs is money well spent I reckon.

Could be. But didn't the ac3d author already screw some paying customers
over? I remember the discussion here on the devel list.

I don't really care who uses what, as long as I can use Blender. AC3D
may be a nice application and is certainly good enough for FlightGear
modeling, but Blender is far from almost impossible to use.

m.

Disclaimer: I'm biased.  :-)

[1] http://members.aon.at/mfranz/flightgear/blender-textured-lights.html


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637alloc_id=16865op=click
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] Creating a PA34-Seneca (which FDM to choose?)

2005-12-22 Thread Erik Hofman

Martin Spott wrote:

Martin Spott wrote:


Fein   Bietet Ihr vielleicht auch verguenstigt Type-Ratings fuer
FlightGear-Aktivisten an !?  ;-)


Oh, please excuse, this was meant to be private EMail,


But now I want to know the answer :-)

Erik


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637alloc_id=16865op=click
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] options scanninng sequence

2005-12-22 Thread Martin Spott
Erik Hofman wrote:

 1. $FG_ROOT should be a global value
 2. ~/.fgfsrc should be a personal preference
 3. fgfs --fg-root should be a one time option overriding the defaults
 
 Does anybody have any objection to reversing the order?

_I_ don't object, to my impression you proposal is the only one that
makes sense   but my voice is not deciding,

Martin.
-- 
 Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637alloc_id=16865op=click
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel


RE: [Flightgear-devel] options scanninng sequence

2005-12-22 Thread Vivian Meazza
Martin Spott

 Erik Hofman wrote:
 
  1. $FG_ROOT should be a global value
  2. ~/.fgfsrc should be a personal preference
  3. fgfs --fg-root should be a one time option overriding the defaults
 
  Does anybody have any objection to reversing the order?
 
 _I_ don't object, to my impression you proposal is the only one that
 makes sense   but my voice is not deciding,
 
 Martin.
 --
  Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
 --
 

Just to add that it doesn't work properly under my Cygwin, but then my home
directory is home/vivian meazza/. That's automatically generated by Cygwin
and I'm not changing it. I note, however that XP users will install FG in
C:\program files\FlightGear.

Further, I do NOT want the code automatically saving my changes, we should
be given the option on exit. Apart from downloading a new version of
preferences.xml, is there any way back to the default values: there should
be?

Is there an option to disable this facility? In its current state I don't
want it on my system. 

Vivian





---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idv37alloc_id865op=click
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] options scanninng sequence

2005-12-22 Thread Stefan Seifert

Vivian Meazza wrote:

Further, I do NOT want the code automatically saving my changes, we should
be given the option on exit. Apart from downloading a new version of
preferences.xml, is there any way back to the default values: there should
be?
  


Just delete the generated preferences.xml?

Nine


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637alloc_id=16865op=click
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] Next world scenery build

2005-12-22 Thread Martin Spott
Hello Jon, I hope you didn't get me wrong:

Martin Spott wrote:

 I see that SWBD might have slightly more detail in certain areas as it
 follows even small quay walls but the staircase mode in SWBD makes it
 insuitable for creating FlightGear shorelines right out of the box. It
 may well be recommended to use SWBD as a reference for those who intend
 to modify scenery around coastal sites.

I didn't mean to be harsh about your proposal. I just think we have to
realize that there's still much to be done before we can profit from
SWBD for our purpose:

1.) We need to to find out how to smoothen the shoreline in a manner
that is suitable for the whole planet. This probably has already
been tackled by someone else, but we have to find out.
2.) We need a means to fill the gaps in SWBD. As it is based on SRTM it
does not cover the areas 'behind' the polar circles (I don't have
the exact numbers at hand).
3.) We need to have this done within just a few days because Curt wants
to start generating the new scenery RSN.

Under these circumstances I prefer to rely on the work of those people
who have much more experience in fine-tuning shoreline data, especially
now as there's a shapefile release that clearly and cleanly separates
between the different types of shore-/coastline.

Cheers,
Martin.
-- 
 Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637alloc_id=16865op=click
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] options scanninng sequence

2005-12-22 Thread Erik Hofman

Vivian Meazza wrote:
Further, I do NOT want the code automatically saving my changes, we should

be given the option on exit. Apart from downloading a new version of
preferences.xml, is there any way back to the default values: there should
be?

Is there an option to disable this facility? In its current state I don't
want it on my system. 


This has been the intention from the start, hold on.

Erik


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637alloc_id=16865op=click
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] options scanninng sequence

2005-12-22 Thread Stefan Seifert

Curtis L. Olson wrote:
I should also point out that I received an error message when the new 
system couldn't load my preferences if they didn't exist.  We should 
see an error message in this case.


You received an error message and you should see an error message? Seems 
to me like that's the same?


Nine


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637alloc_id=16865op=click
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] options scanninng sequence

2005-12-22 Thread Curtis L. Olson

Stefan Seifert wrote:


Curtis L. Olson wrote:

I should also point out that I received an error message when the new 
system couldn't load my preferences if they didn't exist.  We should 
see an error message in this case.



You received an error message and you should see an error message? 
Seems to me like that's the same?


Sorry, pre-caffeine typo ... I meant that I *don't* think we should see 
an error message if this optional options file doesn't yet exist.


Curt.

--
Curtis Olsonhttp://www.flightgear.org/~curt
HumanFIRST Program  http://www.humanfirst.umn.edu/
FlightGear Project  http://www.flightgear.org
Unique text:2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637alloc_id=16865op=click
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel


RE: [Flightgear-devel] options scanninng sequence

2005-12-22 Thread Vivian Meazza
Erik Hofman

 Vivian Meazza wrote:
 
  Just to add that it doesn't work properly under my Cygwin, but then my
 home
  directory is home/vivian meazza/. That's automatically generated by
 Cygwin
  and I'm not changing it. I note, however that XP users will install FG
 in
  C:\program files\FlightGear.
 
 Could you test the CVS version again?
 
  Further, I do NOT want the code automatically saving my changes, we
 should
  be given the option on exit. Apart from downloading a new version of
  preferences.xml, is there any way back to the default values: there
 should
  be?
 
  Is there an option to disable this facility? In its current state I
 don't
  want it on my system.
 
 I've added --enable-save-on-exit and --disable-save-on-exit.
 This is a bit of an odd puppy since I've implemented the suggestion from
 Vassilii and this particular property is saved inside the user
 preferences.xml file, so you should only have the specify
 --disable-save-on-exit once.
 

Look like what we want, thanks - I'm busy right now, but I'll test it later.

V.



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idv37alloc_id865op=click
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel


[Flightgear-devel] (no subject)

2005-12-22 Thread marjacek



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637alloc_id=16865op=click
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel