Re: [Flightgear-devel] Aircraft rating now visible in fgrun
See : http://frbouvi.free.fr/flightsim/fgrun-rating-system.png And what about this one ? http://frbouvi.free.fr/flightsim/fgrun-rating-system-star-en.png -Fred -- RSA(R) Conference 2012 Save $700 by Nov 18 Register now http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] Aircraft rating now visible in fgrun
Le 12/11/2011 11:05, Frederic Bouvier a écrit : See : http://frbouvi.free.fr/flightsim/fgrun-rating-system.png And what about this one ? http://frbouvi.free.fr/flightsim/fgrun-rating-system-star-en.png -Fred Hi Fred, Stars are funnier, but from my point of view, the size of the rating block and text looks a bit too big. Alexis -- RSA(R) Conference 2012 Save $700 by Nov 18 Register now http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel -- RSA(R) Conference 2012 Save $700 by Nov 18 Register now http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
[Flightgear-devel] Building Simgear with OSG 3.0.0
Hi guys, trying to build the latest GIT version of FG, when cmake'ing simgear it complains that OSG 2.9.7 is installed, even though I've just downloaded and compiled OSG 3.0.1 can someone provide some pointers as to how to fix this? Or is there's quick fix in the cmake system I can do? Ta, Chris -- RSA(R) Conference 2012 Save $700 by Nov 18 Register now http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] Building Simgear with OSG 3.0.0
Am 12.11.2011 11:03, schrieb Chris Marr: trying to build the latest GIT version of FG, when cmake'ing simgear it complains that OSG 2.9.7 is installed, even though I've just downloaded and compiled OSG 3.0.1 can someone provide some pointers as to how to fix this? Or is there's quick fix in the cmake system I can do? Indeed, =OSG3.0.0 is required now. Make sure you also install OSG3.0.1 after compiling it. Obviously cmake still finds your 2.9.7 OSG installation, so either remove the old OSG installation, or provide the path to your OSG3.0.1 _installation_ folder to cmake directly, i.e. using environment variables as described here: http://wiki.flightgear.org/Building_using_CMake cheers, Thorsten -- RSA(R) Conference 2012 Save $700 by Nov 18 Register now http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
[Flightgear-devel] Fixing fgfs-construct crashes
James Turner zakal...@mac.com wrote: Onwards with fixing the fgfs-construct crashes! I have had pretty good luck building complex scenery with a modified version of fgfs-construct. Here is what I did: Following advice by Peter Sadrozinski here on the list, I started from the code in papillon's terragear repo where GPC is replaced by clipper. I then applied a few patches, reducing various epsilon constants in the code which I think were too loose and caused inconsistencies in the clipper. You can find my code here (in the branch custom_scenery_clean): https://gitorious.org/~maximeguillaud/papillon81/maxime-terragear-cs/commits/custom_scenery_clean More specifically, the patches relevant to fgfs-construct are in commits 81a78602e09b67edd58b2cedacf09079239b0177 and 8601f66cf7cf00ffda38f57cee77ae991c42dab8. The second one uses the constant SG_EPSILON defined in Simgear. I reduced the value of this constant in simgear/constants.h: #define SG_EPSILON (DBL_EPSILON*10) (Note that I am using a different installation of Simgear for terragear and for fgfs, so I do not know if this change would have consequences on fgfs). With the above settings, I was able to process large amounts of scenery without any crash. So far I have tried a band covering Europe between 12 and 14 degrees East, i.e. going through Sicily, Italy, the Austrian Alps, the Czech Republic and Germany, Sweden and Norway, up to 69 degrees North. My scenery includes detailed terrain (fitted with 15m accuracy), the CORINE land cover, and OSM rail and roads up to the secondary network. The latest update in the BTG format seem to have fixed the swirlies. You can see a few screenshots here: http://www.mguillaud.net/fg/scenery-gallery/ The only problem that prevents me from calling it final and generating custom scenery for all of Europe can be seen in the last screenshot: http://www.mguillaud.net/fg/scenery-gallery/fgfs-screen-008.png Sometimes, one polygon will have the correct shape but the material is wrong, and it appears all gray. This seems to occur only around roads. Any advice on this is appreciated. I had a chat with Martin Spott (hi Martin !) a few days ago and he mentioned that the bug is known, and proceeded to explain it to me, however I have not been able to relate his explanation to the code in fgfs-construct. I can provide a minimal set of files (3 roads) that trigger this problem, in case anyone can help with the debugging. Maxime -- RSA(R) Conference 2012 Save $700 by Nov 18 Register now http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] Fixing fgfs-construct crashes
Hi Maxime, Final material assignment is done when the data is triangulated. (All the points connected into triangles.) The algorithm needs a set of points, and it also needs a set of edges (boundaries) that show the division between material shapes. Finally for each material type, it needs a point inside each unique area. The algorithm starts at each given point and finds the triangle that encloses it assigns it the material type of that point. Then works it's way to all the neighbor triangles and assigns them the same type. It keeps going until it hits an edge (which we provide) or it runs out of triangles. Then it continues on to the next point and the next and the next. So this all sounds good (I think) except we now have to compute a point inside each material region. Easy, right? Well, except that all the published algorithms can tell you if a random point is inside a polygon or not, but they don't tell you how to manufacture a point that is guaranteed to be inside a polygon. With very complex convex shapes, possibility of holes, and all kinds of extremely tiny numbers (or points that are extremely close to each other) this becomes a bit more of a challenge. We have an approach with some heuristics to try to find a good point inside a polygon, but it sounds like this is failing. Also I haven't had my fingers in the code for quite some time and there have been some substantial changes. So what you want to do is identify the mistaken areas and determine the point we generate inside those areas. Then try to figure out what's wrong with the picture? Is the point in the area? Is it too close to an edge? Did we miss an edge such that the classification algorithm loses contain and spills out into a neighboring region. The answer here is to get down and dirty and look at the intermediate results ... it's painstaking, drudgery work, but someone needs to dig in to each specific case and figure out exactly why it's breaking, and then either fix the problem directly, or back up to an earlier stage in the pipeline and try to catch/avoid/fix the situation before it causes trouble. There are direct bugs, and then there are difficult situations with the data that arise. Best regards, Curt. On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 7:59 AM, Maxime Guillaud m...@mguillaud.net wrote: James Turner zakal...@mac.com wrote: Onwards with fixing the fgfs-construct crashes! I have had pretty good luck building complex scenery with a modified version of fgfs-construct. Here is what I did: Following advice by Peter Sadrozinski here on the list, I started from the code in papillon's terragear repo where GPC is replaced by clipper. I then applied a few patches, reducing various epsilon constants in the code which I think were too loose and caused inconsistencies in the clipper. You can find my code here (in the branch custom_scenery_clean): https://gitorious.org/~maximeguillaud/papillon81/maxime-terragear-cs/commits/custom_scenery_clean More specifically, the patches relevant to fgfs-construct are in commits 81a78602e09b67edd58b2cedacf09079239b0177 and 8601f66cf7cf00ffda38f57cee77ae991c42dab8. The second one uses the constant SG_EPSILON defined in Simgear. I reduced the value of this constant in simgear/constants.h: #define SG_EPSILON (DBL_EPSILON*10) (Note that I am using a different installation of Simgear for terragear and for fgfs, so I do not know if this change would have consequences on fgfs). With the above settings, I was able to process large amounts of scenery without any crash. So far I have tried a band covering Europe between 12 and 14 degrees East, i.e. going through Sicily, Italy, the Austrian Alps, the Czech Republic and Germany, Sweden and Norway, up to 69 degrees North. My scenery includes detailed terrain (fitted with 15m accuracy), the CORINE land cover, and OSM rail and roads up to the secondary network. The latest update in the BTG format seem to have fixed the swirlies. You can see a few screenshots here: http://www.mguillaud.net/fg/scenery-gallery/ The only problem that prevents me from calling it final and generating custom scenery for all of Europe can be seen in the last screenshot: http://www.mguillaud.net/fg/scenery-gallery/fgfs-screen-008.png Sometimes, one polygon will have the correct shape but the material is wrong, and it appears all gray. This seems to occur only around roads. Any advice on this is appreciated. I had a chat with Martin Spott (hi Martin !) a few days ago and he mentioned that the bug is known, and proceeded to explain it to me, however I have not been able to relate his explanation to the code in fgfs-construct. I can provide a minimal set of files (3 roads) that trigger this problem, in case anyone can help with the debugging. Maxime -- RSA(R) Conference 2012 Save $700 by Nov 18 Register now
Re: [Flightgear-devel] Fixing fgfs-construct crashes
On 12 Nov 2011, at 13:59, Maxime Guillaud wrote: I have had pretty good luck building complex scenery with a modified version of fgfs-construct. Here is what I did: snip Okay, this all sounds like good news indeed. Martin, Chris, Peter - I think the steps need to be as follows - get a branch of terragear with the clipper changes, and probably the epsilon changes Maxime describes (because I've always worried, they were only needed due to GPC problems). Then we can all test on our favourite datasets, and see if there's any regressions, and hopefully a big improvement in not crashing! (I'm also glad to hear the BTG changes have really fixed the swirlies) You can see a few screenshots here: http://www.mguillaud.net/fg/scenery-gallery/ Looks very good to me - especially when it's combined with some of the shader / materials work that is coming! The only problem that prevents me from calling it final and generating custom scenery for all of Europe can be seen in the last screenshot: http://www.mguillaud.net/fg/scenery-gallery/fgfs-screen-008.png Personally, I'd could live with the issue to get the world scenery rebuilt, but certainly to have the code on an official branch for testing, and investigation of this bug makes sense, I think. James -- RSA(R) Conference 2012 Save $700 by Nov 18 Register now http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] Aircraft rating now visible in fgrun
Am 12.11.11 11:05, schrieb Frederic Bouvier: See : http://frbouvi.free.fr/flightsim/fgrun-rating-system.png And what about this one ? http://frbouvi.free.fr/flightsim/fgrun-rating-system-star-en.png -Fred -- RSA(R) Conference 2012 Save $700 by Nov 18 Register now http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel Hi Fred Looking to the bars and the stars I think the stars are probably too easy. The rating system introduced looks much more sophisticated. Cheers, Yves -- RSA(R) Conference 2012 Save $700 by Nov 18 Register now http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] Aircraft rating now visible in fgrun
Hi Yves, Am 12.11.11 11:05, schrieb Frederic Bouvier: See : http://frbouvi.free.fr/flightsim/fgrun-rating-system.png And what about this one ? http://frbouvi.free.fr/flightsim/fgrun-rating-system-star-en.png Hi Fred Looking to the bars and the stars I think the stars are probably too easy. The rating system introduced looks much more sophisticated. too easy ? I am not sure to understand what you mean Regards, -Fred -- RSA(R) Conference 2012 Save $700 by Nov 18 Register now http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] Fixpoints navaids
Am 10.11.11 12:14, schrieb HB-GRAL: Assuming the fix table should contain VFR waypoints mainly, another question might be if the fix table can be filtered (only for the map) into waypoints containing only VPXYZ-Point-Naming and others containing numbers ? Is this a bad idea (for the map) ? Please tell me if this a bad idea. I just added a filter to the fix data on the map: only 5 letters without numbers is shown (as a waypoint) -- map.fgx.ch, activating fix layer Thanks, Yves -- RSA(R) Conference 2012 Save $700 by Nov 18 Register now http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] Aircraft rating now visible in fgrun
Am 12.11.11 19:35, schrieb Frederic Bouvier: Hi Yves, Am 12.11.11 11:05, schrieb Frederic Bouvier: See : http://frbouvi.free.fr/flightsim/fgrun-rating-system.png And what about this one ? http://frbouvi.free.fr/flightsim/fgrun-rating-system-star-en.png Hi Fred Looking to the bars and the stars I think the stars are probably too easy. The rating system introduced looks much more sophisticated. too easy ? I am not sure to understand what you mean Fred, I meant it is too easy because the stars simplify the system to much, but I realize that the rating system is written down very sophisitcated, but indeed have 5 levels only ... so it is no difference for you probably. I was looking to the stars and thought, wow, we have 100 % cockpits etc. Cheers, Yves -- RSA(R) Conference 2012 Save $700 by Nov 18 Register now http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] [Flightgear-commitlogs] FlightGear branch, next,
Flightgear-commitlogs wrote: commit 0905b4f36781c057b0c17b5af2c9ccfd72cf0fcd Author: Durk Talsma Date: Sat Nov 12 18:40:23 2011 +0100 Fixing an age old bug. AIAircraft arriving on an airport never received a proper gateId, causing them to taxi to the end of the world and beyond. Is this the one which was causing the 'rabbits' at EHLE ? Martin. -- Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are ! -- -- RSA(R) Conference 2012 Save $700 by Nov 18 Register now http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] Aircraft rating now visible in fgrun
Am 12.11.11 19:35, schrieb Frederic Bouvier: Hi Yves, Am 12.11.11 11:05, schrieb Frederic Bouvier: See : http://frbouvi.free.fr/flightsim/fgrun-rating-system.png And what about this one ? http://frbouvi.free.fr/flightsim/fgrun-rating-system-star-en.png Hi Fred Looking to the bars and the stars I think the stars are probably too easy. The rating system introduced looks much more sophisticated. too easy ? I am not sure to understand what you mean Fred, I meant it is too easy because the stars simplify the system to much, but I realize that the rating system is written down very sophisitcated, but indeed have 5 levels only ... so it is no difference for you probably. I was looking to the stars and thought, wow, we have 100 % cockpits etc. The rating system is not my invention. It is just an implementation of what was discussed on the forum : http://www.flightgear.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=4t=12193 and described here : http://wiki.flightgear.org/Formalizing_Aircraft_Status Regards, -Fred -- RSA(R) Conference 2012 Save $700 by Nov 18 Register now http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] Fixing fgfs-construct crashes
With this minimal data set, do you see bad node print messages during construct? found a bad node = xxx When a node touches a line segment on the same contour, the bad node is removed, as odd/even clipper algorithms blow up when this occurs. I would experiment with removing the code that removes the node. You'll be trading one error for another, but it may help track this down. Take a look at reduce_contour_degeneracy() in poly_support.cxx If this is the cause, then we'll have to figure out a different way to handle touching segments. As Curt said, pushing nodes around may not be any better than removing the offending node all together. Pete On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 8:59 AM, Maxime Guillaud m...@mguillaud.net wrote: James Turner zakal...@mac.com wrote: Onwards with fixing the fgfs-construct crashes! I have had pretty good luck building complex scenery with a modified version of fgfs-construct. Here is what I did: Following advice by Peter Sadrozinski here on the list, I started from the code in papillon's terragear repo where GPC is replaced by clipper. I then applied a few patches, reducing various epsilon constants in the code which I think were too loose and caused inconsistencies in the clipper. You can find my code here (in the branch custom_scenery_clean): https://gitorious.org/~maximeguillaud/papillon81/maxime-terragear-cs/commits/custom_scenery_clean More specifically, the patches relevant to fgfs-construct are in commits 81a78602e09b67edd58b2cedacf09079239b0177 and 8601f66cf7cf00ffda38f57cee77ae991c42dab8. The second one uses the constant SG_EPSILON defined in Simgear. I reduced the value of this constant in simgear/constants.h: #define SG_EPSILON (DBL_EPSILON*10) (Note that I am using a different installation of Simgear for terragear and for fgfs, so I do not know if this change would have consequences on fgfs). With the above settings, I was able to process large amounts of scenery without any crash. So far I have tried a band covering Europe between 12 and 14 degrees East, i.e. going through Sicily, Italy, the Austrian Alps, the Czech Republic and Germany, Sweden and Norway, up to 69 degrees North. My scenery includes detailed terrain (fitted with 15m accuracy), the CORINE land cover, and OSM rail and roads up to the secondary network. The latest update in the BTG format seem to have fixed the swirlies. You can see a few screenshots here: http://www.mguillaud.net/fg/scenery-gallery/ The only problem that prevents me from calling it final and generating custom scenery for all of Europe can be seen in the last screenshot: http://www.mguillaud.net/fg/scenery-gallery/fgfs-screen-008.png Sometimes, one polygon will have the correct shape but the material is wrong, and it appears all gray. This seems to occur only around roads. Any advice on this is appreciated. I had a chat with Martin Spott (hi Martin !) a few days ago and he mentioned that the bug is known, and proceeded to explain it to me, however I have not been able to relate his explanation to the code in fgfs-construct. I can provide a minimal set of files (3 roads) that trigger this problem, in case anyone can help with the debugging. Maxime -- RSA(R) Conference 2012 Save $700 by Nov 18 Register now http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel -- RSA(R) Conference 2012 Save $700 by Nov 18 Register now http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] [Flightgear-commitlogs] FlightGear branch, next,
Is this the one which was causing the 'rabbits' at EHLE ? Nope, this one was just causing aircraft that landed at an airport without a ground network to taxi to the end of the world (or better the beginning: lat/lon 0.00; 0.00). What you're referring to is -I assume- the incrorrect ground offset in the cessna. That isn't really a bug in the true sense of the word. Just inaccurate data. Cheers, Durk -- RSA(R) Conference 2012 Save $700 by Nov 18 Register now http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] Fixing fgfs-construct crashes
Hi Maxime and others, Maxime Guillaud wrote: You can find my code here [...] I'm just starting to recover from a couple of _really_ tight days (including a nice PostgreSQL conference PGConf.DE where I gave a talk about our geodata collection and in-database processing), therefore I'm not yet ready to provide comprehensive responses. Anyhow there's one point I'd like to emphasize: I know it's really cool to maintain private source repositories ;-) but for increasing the overall success of building FlightGear scenery I'd think it would be really beneficial to keep the various development efforts in close relation and sync. Thus I'd invite everyone who's serious about improving the TerraGear toolchain to create a branch in the main repository in order to develop their specific features/changes there - not only but also because this would simplify tracking of the various changes. The former terragear-cs main repository at MapServer was already open to (almost) everybody who asked and now that it's moved over to Gitorious there's really no more excuse not to create branches inside the main repo :-) Best regards, Martin. -- Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are ! -- -- RSA(R) Conference 2012 Save $700 by Nov 18 Register now http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] Aircraft rating now visible in fgrun
Am 12.11.11 20:00, schrieb Frederic Bouvier: Am 12.11.11 19:35, schrieb Frederic Bouvier: Hi Yves, Am 12.11.11 11:05, schrieb Frederic Bouvier: See : http://frbouvi.free.fr/flightsim/fgrun-rating-system.png And what about this one ? http://frbouvi.free.fr/flightsim/fgrun-rating-system-star-en.png Hi Fred Looking to the bars and the stars I think the stars are probably too easy. The rating system introduced looks much more sophisticated. too easy ? I am not sure to understand what you mean Fred, I meant it is too easy because the stars simplify the system to much, but I realize that the rating system is written down very sophisitcated, but indeed have 5 levels only ... so it is no difference for you probably. I was looking to the stars and thought, wow, we have 100 % cockpits etc. The rating system is not my invention. It is just an implementation of what was discussed on the forum : http://www.flightgear.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=4t=12193 and described here : http://wiki.flightgear.org/Formalizing_Aircraft_Status I know it is not your invention. What I mean is that bars and stars say nothing. Who gave the stars, what does it really mean? No info. The wiki page says a lot about the rating, and I don’t know if this is really is reflected now. It isn’t any fundamental critism, just some feedback. Cheers, Yves -- RSA(R) Conference 2012 Save $700 by Nov 18 Register now http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
[Flightgear-devel] KSFO default scenery
Hi Scenery I just noticed that this small scenery bugs at KSFO never have been fixed since many years now (or did I miss something?). When you show me how I can help to fix this, I will really send a merge request, and I guess this is not critical ! But should be solved once ;-) osgDB ac3d reader: could not parse texture coords while reading object Mesh1 Component_1_1 M setting to (0,0) osgDB ac3d reader: could not parse texture coords while reading object Mesh2 Component_1_2 M setting to (0,0) osgDB ac3d reader: could not parse texture coords while reading object Mesh3 Component_1_3 M setting to (0,0) osgDB ac3d reader: could not parse texture coords while reading object Mesh4 Component_1_4 M setting to (0,0) osgDB ac3d reader: could not parse texture coords while reading object Mesh5 Component_1_5 M setting to (0,0) osgDB ac3d reader: could not parse texture coords while reading object Mesh6 Component_1_6 M setting to (0,0) osgDB ac3d reader: could not parse texture coords while reading object Mesh7 Component_1_7 M setting to (0,0) Cheers, Yves -- RSA(R) Conference 2012 Save $700 by Nov 18 Register now http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] Aircraft rating now visible in fgrun
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 10:05 AM, Frederic Bouvier wrote: See : http://frbouvi.free.fr/flightsim/fgrun-rating-system.png And what about this one ? http://frbouvi.free.fr/flightsim/fgrun-rating-system-star-en.png Of the two, I prefer the stars. Great work. Out of interest, what are you planning to display if the aircraft is not rated? Not Rated? -Stuart -- RSA(R) Conference 2012 Save $700 by Nov 18 Register now http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] Aircraft rating now visible in fgrun
So now it would be interesting if fgrun could be used by end users to rate the aircraft in the different categories and then fgrun would pull the ratings from some server that tracks all this. :-) Curt. On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Stuart Buchanan wrote: On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 10:05 AM, Frederic Bouvier wrote: See : http://frbouvi.free.fr/flightsim/fgrun-rating-system.png And what about this one ? http://frbouvi.free.fr/flightsim/fgrun-rating-system-star-en.png Of the two, I prefer the stars. Great work. Out of interest, what are you planning to display if the aircraft is not rated? Not Rated? -Stuart -- RSA(R) Conference 2012 Save $700 by Nov 18 Register now http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel -- Curtis Olson: http://www.atiak.com - http://aem.umn.edu/~uav/ http://www.flightgear.org - http://gallinazo.flightgear.org -- RSA(R) Conference 2012 Save $700 by Nov 18 Register now http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] Aircraft rating now visible in fgrun
Am 13.11.11 00:12, schrieb Curtis Olson: So now it would be interesting if fgrun could be used by end users to rate the aircraft in the different categories and then fgrun would pull the ratings from some server that tracks all this. :-) Curt. Oh yes, I will immediately set up a new Webby-2.0 Free Independent Aircraft Rating Page then :-) Cheers, Yves -- RSA(R) Conference 2012 Save $700 by Nov 18 Register now http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] Aircraft rating now visible in fgrun
On 13 November 2011 10:12, Curtis Olson curtol...@gmail.com wrote: So now it would be interesting if fgrun could be used by end users to rate the aircraft in the different categories and then fgrun would pull the ratings from some server that tracks all this. :-) Curt. But be careful what you wish for. Accepting user ratings would too open to abuse from competing products and KidSFO pilots thumbing an aircraft up for the lolz. I would be surprised if the ratings for the different aircraft ended up being consistent, should rating be accepted from the greater user base. Sorry Curt, you have lost me on the merit of this idea, especially considering the effort required. One person, one vote etc. Regards George -- RSA(R) Conference 2012 Save $700 by Nov 18 Register now http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] Fixing fgfs-construct crashes
Hi Martin,
I've been reluctant to move to the official repository mostly because of
very little understanding of GIT.
I'm a bit more confident, now, so I don't see it as a big problem.
I think most of the work we are doing (alternate clipping library, 850
format) should be considered experimental, however. I'm pretty sure we
want to keep the main branch
concentrated on fixing problems with detailed landclass.
We seem to be breaking terragear pretty good as of late :)
Maxime: I have an experiment for you to try - could you take the UFO under
those grey sections of scenery, and look up at them? I think the normals
have swapped.
Chris mentioned this happening with the skirt around the airport, and I
hadn't seen it until a recent update. Looks like something broke recently.
Pete
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 2:38 PM, Martin Spott martin.sp...@mgras.netwrote:
Hi Maxime and others,
Maxime Guillaud wrote:
You can find my code here [...]
I'm just starting to recover from a couple of _really_ tight days
(including a nice PostgreSQL conference PGConf.DE where I gave a talk
about our geodata collection and in-database processing), therefore I'm
not yet ready to provide comprehensive responses. Anyhow there's one
point I'd like to emphasize:
I know it's really cool to maintain private source repositories ;-)
but for increasing the overall success of building FlightGear
scenery I'd think it would be really beneficial to keep the various
development efforts in close relation and sync. Thus I'd invite
everyone who's serious about improving the TerraGear toolchain to
create a branch in the main repository in order to develop their
specific features/changes there - not only but also because this would
simplify tracking of the various changes.
The former terragear-cs main repository at MapServer was already open
to (almost) everybody who asked and now that it's moved over to
Gitorious there's really no more excuse not to create branches inside
the main repo :-)
Best regards,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--
--
RSA(R) Conference 2012
Save $700 by Nov 18
Register now
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
--
RSA(R) Conference 2012
Save $700 by Nov 18
Register now
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] Fixing fgfs-construct crashes
I have verified that the problem lies in using clipper.
Using the same simple data with GPC works. It appears clipper can
sometimes produce clockwise winded polys.
I'm working on a fix now.
Pete
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 7:59 PM, Peter Sadrozinski
psadrozin...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi Martin,
I've been reluctant to move to the official repository mostly because of
very little understanding of GIT.
I'm a bit more confident, now, so I don't see it as a big problem.
I think most of the work we are doing (alternate clipping library, 850
format) should be considered experimental, however. I'm pretty sure we
want to keep the main branch
concentrated on fixing problems with detailed landclass.
We seem to be breaking terragear pretty good as of late :)
Maxime: I have an experiment for you to try - could you take the UFO under
those grey sections of scenery, and look up at them? I think the normals
have swapped.
Chris mentioned this happening with the skirt around the airport, and I
hadn't seen it until a recent update. Looks like something broke recently.
Pete
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 2:38 PM, Martin Spott martin.sp...@mgras.netwrote:
Hi Maxime and others,
Maxime Guillaud wrote:
You can find my code here [...]
I'm just starting to recover from a couple of _really_ tight days
(including a nice PostgreSQL conference PGConf.DE where I gave a talk
about our geodata collection and in-database processing), therefore I'm
not yet ready to provide comprehensive responses. Anyhow there's one
point I'd like to emphasize:
I know it's really cool to maintain private source repositories ;-)
but for increasing the overall success of building FlightGear
scenery I'd think it would be really beneficial to keep the various
development efforts in close relation and sync. Thus I'd invite
everyone who's serious about improving the TerraGear toolchain to
create a branch in the main repository in order to develop their
specific features/changes there - not only but also because this would
simplify tracking of the various changes.
The former terragear-cs main repository at MapServer was already open
to (almost) everybody who asked and now that it's moved over to
Gitorious there's really no more excuse not to create branches inside
the main repo :-)
Best regards,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--
--
RSA(R) Conference 2012
Save $700 by Nov 18
Register now
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
--
RSA(R) Conference 2012
Save $700 by Nov 18
Register now
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
