Re: [Flightgear-devel] [Flightgear-cvslogs] CVS: data keyboard.xml, 1.99, 1.100

2007-11-11 Thread Detlef Faber
Hello Vivian,

Am Samstag, den 10.11.2007, 19:37 + schrieb Vivian Meazza:
 gerard robin
 
  Sent: 10 November 2007 18:37
  To: FlightGear developers discussions
  Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] [Flightgear-cvslogs] CVS: 
  data keyboard.xml,1.99, 1.100
  
  
  On sam 10 novembre 2007, David Megginson wrote:
   On 10/11/2007, gerard robin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can notice the update has been done , before we could give any 
opinion on the topic. Does it mean , that there is not any other 
alternative, and the CHOICE is that way nothing else  :) :) :)
   
   From my original message:
  
   quote
   I just moved tailwheel-lock from lowercase 'l' to uppercase 
  'L', and 
   reassigned lowercase 'l' to toggle lighting (for easy night starts 
   without searching for switches).  I assigned lighting to 
  the lowercase 
   'l' because I think it would be much more commonly used 
  than tailwheel 
   lock, but if there are general objections (from DC-3 users?) I can 
   swap the two around so that tailwheel lock goes back to 'l'.
  
   Let me know what you think.
   /quote
  
   I or anyone else with access can change it again once there's a 
   consensus -- remember that CVS is the experimentation 
  branch, not the 
   release branch.
  
  
   All the best,
  
  
   David
  
  Oh, i am only like the dog which try to catch his tail.
  
  Since we had the 'L used with carrier , (this was talked 
  before), i only 
  wonder if it would not have been  better to find a global 
  agreement on 
  which key can do what, before to make that update.
  
  There is some  aircraft within CVS which are  carrier compatible.
  
  With that update the launchbar  will not work now.
  
 
 Should be OK, the carrier bindings will over-write the keyboard bindings. It
 will be a problem if there is an aircraft with both tail wheel lock _and_
 carrier launch bar (F4U?) I haven't checked that.
 
The F4U-1 doesn't use the launchbar. It toggles the Tailwheel lock by
Ctrl-L, so l for lighting, L for Launchbar and Ctrl-l for Tailwheel
lock would work. However I would follow every agreement on key usage.


 And perhaps we can come up with a long term solution. I'm sure Melchior's
 little grey cells are working overtime.
 
 Still, perhaps we shouldn't be making changes until we are clearer about the
 consequences.
 
 Vivian 
 
 
Greetings

Detlef

 -
 This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
 Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
 Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
 Download your FREE copy of Splunk now  http://get.splunk.com/
 ___
 Flightgear-devel mailing list
 Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel


-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now  http://get.splunk.com/
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] [Flightgear-cvslogs] CVS: data keyboard.xml, 1.99, 1.100

2007-11-11 Thread gerard robin
On sam 10 novembre 2007, Vivian Meazza wrote:
 gerard robin

  Sent: 10 November 2007 18:37
  To: FlightGear developers discussions
  Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] [Flightgear-cvslogs] CVS:
  data keyboard.xml,1.99, 1.100
 
 
  wonder if it would not have been  better to find a global
  agreement on
  which key can do what, before to make that update.
 
  There is some  aircraft within CVS which are  carrier compatible.
 
  With that update the launchbar  will not work now.

 Should be OK, the carrier bindings will over-write the keyboard bindings.
 It will be a problem if there is an aircraft with both tail wheel lock
 _and_ carrier launch bar (F4U?) I haven't checked that.

 And perhaps we can come up with a long term solution. I'm sure Melchior's
 little grey cells are working overtime.

 Still, perhaps we shouldn't be making changes until we are clearer about
 the consequences.

 Vivian



I did not check it , but your Seafire has both Launchbar and tailwheel lock,
What is the matter now with the keyboard updated ? 

Regard



-- 
Gérard
http://pagesperso-orange.fr/GRTux/


-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now  http://get.splunk.com/
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] [Flightgear-cvslogs] CVS: data keyboard.xml, 1.99, 1.100

2007-11-11 Thread Vivian Meazza
gerard robin

 Sent: 11 November 2007 13:18
 To: FlightGear developers discussions
 Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] [Flightgear-cvslogs] CVS: 
 data keyboard.xml,1.99, 1.100
 
 
 On sam 10 novembre 2007, Vivian Meazza wrote:
  gerard robin
 
   Sent: 10 November 2007 18:37
   To: FlightGear developers discussions
   Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] [Flightgear-cvslogs] CVS: data 
   keyboard.xml,1.99, 1.100
  
  
   wonder if it would not have been  better to find a global 
 agreement 
   on which key can do what, before to make that update.
  
   There is some  aircraft within CVS which are  carrier compatible.
  
   With that update the launchbar  will not work now.
 
  Should be OK, the carrier bindings will over-write the keyboard 
  bindings. It will be a problem if there is an aircraft with 
 both tail 
  wheel lock _and_ carrier launch bar (F4U?) I haven't checked that.
 
  And perhaps we can come up with a long term solution. I'm sure 
  Melchior's little grey cells are working overtime.
 
  Still, perhaps we shouldn't be making changes until we are clearer 
  about the consequences.
 
  Vivian
 
 
 
 I did not check it , but your Seafire has both Launchbar and 
 tailwheel lock, What is the matter now with the keyboard updated ? 
 
 Regard
 

Not really, later on in the YASim config, it's ignored.

Vivian


-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now  http://get.splunk.com/
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] [Flightgear-cvslogs] CVS: data keyboard.xml, 1.99, 1.100

2007-11-11 Thread gerard robin
On dim 11 novembre 2007, Vivian Meazza wrote:
 gerard robin

  Sent: 11 November 2007 13:18
  To: FlightGear developers discussions
  Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] [Flightgear-cvslogs] CVS:
  data keyboard.xml,1.99, 1.100
 
  On sam 10 novembre 2007, Vivian Meazza wrote:
   gerard robin
  
Sent: 10 November 2007 18:37
To: FlightGear developers discussions
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] [Flightgear-cvslogs] CVS: data
keyboard.xml,1.99, 1.100
   
   
wonder if it would not have been  better to find a global
 
  agreement
 
on which key can do what, before to make that update.
   
There is some  aircraft within CVS which are  carrier compatible.
   
With that update the launchbar  will not work now.
  
   Should be OK, the carrier bindings will over-write the keyboard
   bindings. It will be a problem if there is an aircraft with
 
  both tail
 
   wheel lock _and_ carrier launch bar (F4U?) I haven't checked that.
  
   And perhaps we can come up with a long term solution. I'm sure
   Melchior's little grey cells are working overtime.
  
   Still, perhaps we shouldn't be making changes until we are clearer
   about the consequences.
  
   Vivian
 
  I did not check it , but your Seafire has both Launchbar and
  tailwheel lock, What is the matter now with the keyboard updated ?
 
  Regard

 Not really, later on in the YASim config, it's ignored.

 Vivian

Oh, right, thanks.

So the nice way, mainly for carrier  is to ignore the keyboard.xml , and to 
create  some specific key dedicated to the Aircraft.

My apologizes (mainly to David) for that noise which came first from me.

In that case the L l could be used for any other features:
= light , livery and so on.

Regards


-- 
Gérard
http://pagesperso-orange.fr/GRTux/


-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now  http://get.splunk.com/
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] [Flightgear-cvslogs] CVS: data keyboard.xml, 1.99, 1.100

2007-11-10 Thread gerard robin
On sam 10 novembre 2007, David Megginson wrote:
 Update of /var/cvs/FlightGear-0.9/data
 In directory baron:/tmp/cvs-serv32383

 Modified Files:
   keyboard.xml
 Log Message:
 Reassign tail-wheel locking from 'l' to 'L' (previously unused), and
 use 'l' to toggle lighting.


 Index: keyboard.xml
 ===
 RCS file: /var/cvs/FlightGear-0.9/data/keyboard.xml,v
 retrieving revision 1.99
 retrieving revision 1.100
 diff -C 2 -r1.99 -r1.100
 *** keyboard.xml  1 Aug 2007 08:20:21 -   1.99
 --- keyboard.xml  10 Nov 2007 01:30:04 -  1.100
 ***
 *** 625,628 
 --- 625,637 
/key

 +  key n=76
 +   nameL/name
 +   descToggle tail-wheel lock./desc
 +   binding
 +commandproperty-toggle/command
 +property/controls/gear/tailwheel-lock/property
 +   /binding
 +  /key
 +
key n=77
 nameM/name
 ***
 *** 856,863 
key n=108
 namel/name
 !   descToggle tail-wheel lock./desc
 binding
 !commandproperty-toggle/command
 !property/controls/gear/tailwheel-lock/property
 /binding
/key
 --- 865,872 
key n=108
 namel/name
 !   descTurn on aircraft panel lighting./desc
 binding
 !commandnasal/command
 !scriptcontrols.toggleLights()/script
 /binding
/key


I can notice the update has been done , before we could give any opinion on 
the topic.
Does it mean , that there is not any other alternative, and the CHOICE is that 
way nothing else  :) :) :)

Regards


-- 
Gérard
http://pagesperso-orange.fr/GRTux/


-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now  http://get.splunk.com/
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] [Flightgear-cvslogs] CVS: data keyboard.xml, 1.99, 1.100

2007-11-10 Thread David Megginson
On 10/11/2007, gerard robin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I can notice the update has been done , before we could give any opinion on
 the topic.
 Does it mean , that there is not any other alternative, and the CHOICE is that
 way nothing else  :) :) :)

From my original message:

quote
I just moved tailwheel-lock from lowercase 'l' to uppercase 'L', and
reassigned lowercase 'l' to toggle lighting (for easy night starts
without searching for switches).  I assigned lighting to the lowercase
'l' because I think it would be much more commonly used than tailwheel
lock, but if there are general objections (from DC-3 users?) I can
swap the two around so that tailwheel lock goes back to 'l'.

Let me know what you think.
/quote

I or anyone else with access can change it again once there's a
consensus -- remember that CVS is the experimentation branch, not the
release branch.


All the best,


David

-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now  http://get.splunk.com/
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] [Flightgear-cvslogs] CVS: data keyboard.xml, 1.99, 1.100

2007-11-10 Thread gerard robin
On sam 10 novembre 2007, David Megginson wrote:
 On 10/11/2007, gerard robin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  I can notice the update has been done , before we could give any opinion
  on the topic.
  Does it mean , that there is not any other alternative, and the CHOICE is
  that way nothing else  :) :) :)
 
 From my original message:

 quote
 I just moved tailwheel-lock from lowercase 'l' to uppercase 'L', and
 reassigned lowercase 'l' to toggle lighting (for easy night starts
 without searching for switches).  I assigned lighting to the lowercase
 'l' because I think it would be much more commonly used than tailwheel
 lock, but if there are general objections (from DC-3 users?) I can
 swap the two around so that tailwheel lock goes back to 'l'.

 Let me know what you think.
 /quote

 I or anyone else with access can change it again once there's a
 consensus -- remember that CVS is the experimentation branch, not the
 release branch.


 All the best,


 David

Oh, i am only like the dog which try to catch his tail.

Since we had the 'L used with carrier , (this was talked before), i only 
wonder if it would not have been  better to find a global agreement on 
which key can do what, before to make that update.

There is some  aircraft within CVS which are  carrier compatible.

With that update the launchbar  will not work now.

Regards 

-- 
Gérard
http://pagesperso-orange.fr/GRTux/


-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now  http://get.splunk.com/
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] [Flightgear-cvslogs] CVS: data keyboard.xml, 1.99, 1.100

2007-11-10 Thread Vivian Meazza
gerard robin

 Sent: 10 November 2007 18:37
 To: FlightGear developers discussions
 Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] [Flightgear-cvslogs] CVS: 
 data keyboard.xml,1.99, 1.100
 
 
 On sam 10 novembre 2007, David Megginson wrote:
  On 10/11/2007, gerard robin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   I can notice the update has been done , before we could give any 
   opinion on the topic. Does it mean , that there is not any other 
   alternative, and the CHOICE is that way nothing else  :) :) :)
  
  From my original message:
 
  quote
  I just moved tailwheel-lock from lowercase 'l' to uppercase 
 'L', and 
  reassigned lowercase 'l' to toggle lighting (for easy night starts 
  without searching for switches).  I assigned lighting to 
 the lowercase 
  'l' because I think it would be much more commonly used 
 than tailwheel 
  lock, but if there are general objections (from DC-3 users?) I can 
  swap the two around so that tailwheel lock goes back to 'l'.
 
  Let me know what you think.
  /quote
 
  I or anyone else with access can change it again once there's a 
  consensus -- remember that CVS is the experimentation 
 branch, not the 
  release branch.
 
 
  All the best,
 
 
  David
 
 Oh, i am only like the dog which try to catch his tail.
 
 Since we had the 'L used with carrier , (this was talked 
 before), i only 
 wonder if it would not have been  better to find a global 
 agreement on 
 which key can do what, before to make that update.
 
 There is some  aircraft within CVS which are  carrier compatible.
 
 With that update the launchbar  will not work now.
 

Should be OK, the carrier bindings will over-write the keyboard bindings. It
will be a problem if there is an aircraft with both tail wheel lock _and_
carrier launch bar (F4U?) I haven't checked that.

And perhaps we can come up with a long term solution. I'm sure Melchior's
little grey cells are working overtime.

Still, perhaps we shouldn't be making changes until we are clearer about the
consequences.

Vivian 


-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now  http://get.splunk.com/
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel