Re: FOP-0.19 Release

2001-06-15 Thread Daniel Bradby


The dist looks great!! Especially tables and borders!

Few small things that I noted were

- runtests.bat has some conflicts in it causing a small "bad command or 
filename" msg
- docs/examples has a few .runtests* files there
- the changes file doesn't list 0.18 -> 0.19

I was also wondering what needs to be done regarding the Avalon and FOP 
integration (I'm bored and looking for something to do ;) ).


Thanks

Daniel
Arved Sandstrom wrote:

> Both the binary and source releases for FOP-0.19 are now in XML Apache 
> Downloads (http://xml.apache.org/dist/fop/). I put only the tarballs up 
> (gzip'ped tar) since anyone on Windows, Linux, UNIX etc etc can open those 
> as easily as they can open ZIPs, the ZIPs are larger, and having duplicate 
> archives wastes space. If someone absolutely needs ZIPs please let me know - 
> I can get them up there.
> 
> Pleas evaluate this distribution. If as sometimes happens discrepancies are 
> discovered (and it's been a while since our last release, so it's very 
> possible) we'll endeavour to issue a FOP-0.19.1 release within a week or two.
> 
> "hyphen.fo" in the docs/examples/fo directory is commented out of the 
> build.xml for 'runtests'. I did this because FOP breaks on it. Something 
> someone did with hyphenation needs to be fixed.
> 
> Regards,
> Arved Sandstrom
> 
> Fairly Senior Software Type
> e-plicity (http://www.e-plicity.com)
> Wireless * B2B * J2EE * XML --- Halifax, Nova Scotia
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: One Committer's Views on FOP; Informal State of the Union Address

2001-06-11 Thread Daniel Bradby


I've been following FOP now for around 9 months and although I am not 
commercially using it anymore (thanks dot com crash), I am still 
interested in its development. I've been posting a few bug fixes on 
recently but not much more.

The recent re-factoring and talk of re-design has left me confused about 
how I can help. I work from home and have time on my hands, but I don't 
know where to apply myself as anything could change at anytime.

A re-design is needed as the code is like a rabbit warren. If we are 
able to continue development while working separately on the design, 
then great! But please lets not let this great project slow to a snails 
pace, because people will only keep coming back to using FOP if they 
know it's going to improve and expand.

My 2 Australian cents (worth about 0.2 US)

Daniel


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Printing landscape pages using AWTRenderer

2001-05-30 Thread Daniel Bradby

Martin,

In the latest CVS for AWTRenderer is some code in getPageFormat() that
handles portrait and landscape modes. Maybe get a cvs update and see how it
goes.

Daniel

>
> I'm using the AWTRenderer to print documents. Portrait pages are fine but
> I'm having problems with landscape pages.
>
> I have a very basic Printable subclass that calls the AWTRenderer's
> printing methods.
> If the pageHeight < pageWidth I'd like to rotate the page 90 degrees.
>
> The 'transform' method seems to be a utility to do just that.
>
>  public int print(Graphics g,java.awt.print.PageFormat pf, int pageIndex)
> throws java.awt.print.PrinterException {
>
> if (pageHeight < pageWidth) {
> transform ( (Graphics2D)g, 100, 90);
> }
>
> return super.print(g,pf,pageIndex);
>
> }
>
> But this does not change anything. The method manipulates the g2d's
> AffineTransform, would it be expected to work in this context?
>
> Any help is appreciated,
>
> Regards,
>
> Martin Batty
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: JDK 1.4 fonts

2001-05-29 Thread Daniel Bradby


JDK1.3 had heaps of problems with font metrics and FOP includes work-arounds for
those bugs. If they are fixed in JDK1.4 and we are still using the work arounds
. then who knows what sort of results we are getting :)

But if they look good ... well then great! :)

> Just wanted to say that the AWT Renderer looks great with JDK 1.4 beta1.
> The fonts are spaced correctly even with anti-alias rendered fonts.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]