DO NOT REPLY [Bug 49827] New: integration of barcode in fop 1.0
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49827 Summary: integration of barcode in fop 1.0 Product: Fop Version: 1.0 Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: regression Priority: P2 Component: svg AssignedTo: fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org ReportedBy: marc-andre.mar...@progimed.fr Hi, I tried to generate a pdf including a barcode with fop 1.0 and barcode4j 2.0. The following error was generated during the integration of bar code in the pdf : [ERROR] FOUserAgent - Image not available. URI: (instream-object). Reason: org.apache.xmlgraphics.image.loader.ImageException: The file format is not supported. No ImagePreloader found for null (No context info available) This works very well with fop 0.95 and with the same configuration. If I replace the fop.jar by that of fop 0.95 it works. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 49827] integration of barcode in fop 1.0
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49827 marc-andre.mar...@progimed.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P2 |P1 CC||marc-andre.mar...@progimed. ||fr -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug.
Re: maven bundles
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 09:52:56AM +0200, Simon Pepping wrote: On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 07:18:11PM -0400, Benson Margulies wrote: I'm pretty sure that infra is not going to make an exception to the requirement that only a member of the LDAP group for project X can publish maven artifacts for X. I am perfectly sure, after some recent discussions at the incubator and on members@, that your PMC can vote to grant me membership in the group and nothing else. In fact, the PMC chair could just tell infra to make it so :-) I can do that. I have asked the PMC for their opinion. I will let you know progress ASAP. No objections. Done. You are now a member of the unix group xmlgraphics. Simon -- Simon Pepping home page: http://www.leverkruid.eu
Apache Retreat in Hursley, UK - 17-19th September
Forwarded message from Nick Burch n...@apache.org Hi All Just a reminder that our next Apache Retreat will be in Hursley in the UK, from the 17th - 19th September. That's a little over a month away now! If you're an Apache Committer, we'd like to invite you to come for the whole weekend. We've booked Tipis to stay in(!), catering on-site, we've conference facilities sorted for running a BarCamp both days, we'll be doing lightning talks, socialising, hacking etc. If you're a user of Apache software, we'd love for you to come along in the day on the Saturday. We're running a BarCamp in the day, and it'll be great chance to learn more about new Apache projects, how the Apache Way leads us to develop software, as well as to talk about your current projects. More details on the event, and a link to the signup site are available from the ApacheCon wiki: http://wiki.apache.org/apachecon/ (Signup is available now for the whole retreat, and he barcamp signup will open on Monday) Also, if funding would be an issue to stop you attending, then the Travel Assistance Committee are accepting applications for assistance to attend until Wednesday 11th. More details, and a link to the applications site are available from: http://www.apache.org/travel/ Nick (On behalf of the retreat organising committee)
Re: maven bundles
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 07:18:11PM -0400, Benson Margulies wrote: Otherwise, some committer is going to have to be willing to follow the instructions at: http://www.apache.org/dev/publishing-maven-artifacts.html#signing up Unfortunately, those instructions assume a maven build. I'm fairly sure that I know what to do instead in your case, but some improvisation may follow. To be clear, I've submitted the INFRA ticket for you already. I spent some time on understanding this maven repository business. I see that xmlgraphics commons and fop are already configured in Nexus. They are present in the repository with the previous releases. Does this mean that no action of infrastructure is needed? The Nexus book suggests that I can upload the bundle from a GUI, without the need for a maven build. I could get to this interface screen, but did not try the actual upload. I think we have to solve some issues with our bundle: Missing in our POM: the parent section. Missing in our bundle: signatures, md5 and sha1 checksums for the 3 jar files and the pom file. Should these files also be included in the bundle? I will try to get advice on the release-discuss list. Maybe I can do this deployment, without having to install maven. Simon -- Simon Pepping home page: http://www.leverkruid.eu
Re: maven bundles
Simon, Brian Fox set up Nexus late last night my time after I pinged him, that's why Nexus is set up. I have a script that will create the checksums and signatures (using Maven itself) and push the pieces. You don't need that parent section. The document mixes up things that are convenient for maven builds with things that are required. I plan to push later today. --benson On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 7:09 AM, Simon Pepping spepp...@leverkruid.eu wrote: On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 07:18:11PM -0400, Benson Margulies wrote: Otherwise, some committer is going to have to be willing to follow the instructions at: http://www.apache.org/dev/publishing-maven-artifacts.html#signing up Unfortunately, those instructions assume a maven build. I'm fairly sure that I know what to do instead in your case, but some improvisation may follow. To be clear, I've submitted the INFRA ticket for you already. I spent some time on understanding this maven repository business. I see that xmlgraphics commons and fop are already configured in Nexus. They are present in the repository with the previous releases. Does this mean that no action of infrastructure is needed? The Nexus book suggests that I can upload the bundle from a GUI, without the need for a maven build. I could get to this interface screen, but did not try the actual upload. I think we have to solve some issues with our bundle: Missing in our POM: the parent section. Missing in our bundle: signatures, md5 and sha1 checksums for the 3 jar files and the pom file. Should these files also be included in the bundle? I will try to get advice on the release-discuss list. Maybe I can do this deployment, without having to install maven. Simon -- Simon Pepping home page: http://www.leverkruid.eu
Re: maven bundles
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 07:56:25AM -0400, Benson Margulies wrote: I've done the upload, but I'm not going to promote without giving people a chance to look around. https://repository.apache.org/service/local/staging/deploy/maven2 I'll post a patch with the explanation about how I did this. If I don't hear anything by tomorrow AM to the contrary, I'll promote the staging repository. Thanks. Unfortunately, I noticed one problem in our fop pom file: fop-1.0 depends on xmlgraphics-commons-1.4, not on 1.3. The following change: dependency groupIdorg.apache.xmlgraphics/groupId artifactIdxmlgraphics-commons/artifactId - version1.3/version + version1.4/version /dependency should be made. I made that change and added the parent element, and I updated the bundle on http://people.apache.org/~spepping/fop-1.0. The md5 and sha1 files do not include the file name, which is expected by my md5sum and sha1sum programs. I guess that that is not a real problem. Otherwise everything is as expected. Simon -- Simon Pepping home page: http://www.leverkruid.eu
Re: maven bundles
It is easier for me to update my copy and do this again. On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 9:59 AM, Simon Pepping spepp...@leverkruid.eu wrote: On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 07:56:25AM -0400, Benson Margulies wrote: I've done the upload, but I'm not going to promote without giving people a chance to look around. https://repository.apache.org/service/local/staging/deploy/maven2 I'll post a patch with the explanation about how I did this. If I don't hear anything by tomorrow AM to the contrary, I'll promote the staging repository. Thanks. Unfortunately, I noticed one problem in our fop pom file: fop-1.0 depends on xmlgraphics-commons-1.4, not on 1.3. The following change: dependency groupIdorg.apache.xmlgraphics/groupId artifactIdxmlgraphics-commons/artifactId - version1.3/version + version1.4/version /dependency should be made. I made that change and added the parent element, and I updated the bundle on http://people.apache.org/~spepping/fop-1.0. The md5 and sha1 files do not include the file name, which is expected by my md5sum and sha1sum programs. I guess that that is not a real problem. Otherwise everything is as expected. Simon -- Simon Pepping home page: http://www.leverkruid.eu
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 49830] New: Here is a maven POM that I used to publish 1.4/1.0 to Nexus
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49830 Summary: Here is a maven POM that I used to publish 1.4/1.0 to Nexus Product: Fop Version: 1.1dev Platform: PC Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: general AssignedTo: fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org ReportedBy: bimargul...@gmail.com I'm attaching a pom, with embedded instructions, for use in publishing to the Apache Nexus repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 49830] Here is a maven POM that I used to publish 1.4/1.0 to Nexus
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49830 --- Comment #1 from bmargulies bimargul...@gmail.com 2010-08-26 10:57:56 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=25950) -- (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25950) pom -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug.
