Re: Gaps in table columns
Hi Andreas, Thanks for your inputs. Andreas L Delmelle wrote: On Oct 26, 2007, at 19:35, Andreas L Delmelle wrote: On Oct 26, 2007, at 19:25, Vincent Hennebert wrote: in layoutmgr.table.ColumnSetup an error message is thrown if there are gaps between columns. There is also some code in the TableFObj tree to deal with column gaps. But AFAIU there’s nothing in the spec stating that fo:table-columns should be consecutive. Indeed not. You could number your columns 100, 200, 300... IIRC, they don't even have to be defined in ascending order, and neither do the table-cells. So, if you'd like, you could define a three column table: fo:table ... fo:table-column column-number=10 .../ fo:table-column column-number=5 .../ fo:table-column column-number=1 .../ ... It just occurred to me that I wouldn't really know the 'expected' result in this case... :-) A table with 10 columns with potentially border or background specifications for columns #1, #5, #10. I’d say. I don't believe --could be wrong-- that FOP currently makes any attempt to re-order the columns, so column-number 10 will be rendered as the first column? Haven’t figured out yet by looking at the code. But I will fix that if necessary. Cheers, Vincent
Gaps in table columns
Hi, in layoutmgr.table.ColumnSetup an error message is thrown if there are gaps between columns. There is also some code in the TableFObj tree to deal with column gaps. But AFAIU there’s nothing in the spec stating that fo:table-columns should be consecutive. And as table-columns are only placeholders for properties that may be used by children table-cells, I don’t see what is wrong with gaps. Anyone against me changing this behaviour? Thanks, Vincent
Re: Gaps in table columns
On Oct 26, 2007, at 19:25, Vincent Hennebert wrote: in layoutmgr.table.ColumnSetup an error message is thrown if there are gaps between columns. There is also some code in the TableFObj tree to deal with column gaps. But AFAIU there’s nothing in the spec stating that fo:table-columns should be consecutive. Indeed not. You could number your columns 100, 200, 300... IIRC, they don't even have to be defined in ascending order, and neither do the table-cells. So, if you'd like, you could define a three column table: fo:table ... fo:table-column column-number=10 .../ fo:table-column column-number=5 .../ fo:table-column column-number=1 .../ ... And as table-columns are only placeholders for properties that may be used by children table-cells, I don’t see what is wrong with gaps. Nothing. Anyone against me changing this behaviour? Nope. Cheers Andreas
Re: Gaps in table columns
On Oct 26, 2007, at 19:35, Andreas L Delmelle wrote: On Oct 26, 2007, at 19:25, Vincent Hennebert wrote: in layoutmgr.table.ColumnSetup an error message is thrown if there are gaps between columns. There is also some code in the TableFObj tree to deal with column gaps. But AFAIU there’s nothing in the spec stating that fo:table-columns should be consecutive. Indeed not. You could number your columns 100, 200, 300... IIRC, they don't even have to be defined in ascending order, and neither do the table-cells. So, if you'd like, you could define a three column table: fo:table ... fo:table-column column-number=10 .../ fo:table-column column-number=5 .../ fo:table-column column-number=1 .../ ... It just occurred to me that I wouldn't really know the 'expected' result in this case... :-) I don't believe --could be wrong-- that FOP currently makes any attempt to re-order the columns, so column-number 10 will be rendered as the first column? Cheers Andreas
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38243] - [patch] gaps in table-columns crash fop
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38243. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38243 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-03 08:33 --- Applied. Thanks. Sorry for the delay. This seems to have slipped through the cracks. http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=399200view=rev -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38243] - [patch] gaps in table-columns crash fop
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38243. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38243 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-12 18:47 --- Created an attachment (id=17400) -- (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17400action=view) Solves problems with gaps in table-columns -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
