Re: FOrayFont patch almost ready

2005-12-13 Thread Vincent Hennebert

Well, that's just what I was wondering: Bugzilla doesn't seem to have
made a notification on the fop-dev list. O_o
You may find it directly on Bugzilla, bug number 35948. There's
something I don't get: its status is still NEW but it doesn't appear
when searching for the new bugs for Fop.

Something I forgot to mention: there is still a little issue with
transcoders: there is currently no means to configure the access to the
font-config file. I'll post a note on this later today, in a dedicated
thread.

Thanks,
Vincent


Jeremias Maerki a écrit :

Uhm, cool but where did you post your pre-patch? :-)

On 12.12.2005 22:44:04 Vincent Hennebert wrote:


Team,

I've just posted an updated pre-patch of my FOray adaptation work. I put
it as a pre-patch because the junit tests don't run well anymore (about
75 errors with junit-layout-standard). However, the pdf output looks
right on the few tests I have run. The weird thing is that the XML
renderer doesn't seem to get the same values for the area tree elements
as the PDF renderer.

For now I'm unable to find what's wrong. Perhaps that those who have a
better knowledge of the layout part or of the test system will be able
to give some hints? I'm going on searching but I think you can start
looking at my modifications right now. I hope to find the problem soon.

Normally the pdf, ps and AWT outputs should work well. The default
font-config file may require some adaptation, especially for the AWT
output. You can find informations in [1] and by me.

Please don't hesitate to tell me if I've done things wrong or to ask any
questions.

Thanks,
Vincent

[1] http://www.axsl.org/font/configure.html





Jeremias Maerki





Re: FOrayFont patch almost ready

2005-12-13 Thread Jeremias Maerki
I've reassigned the bug to fop-dev. I wonder what happened here. There's
another issue concerning BugZilla entries: A lot of old issues don't
appear in normal searches anymore even though they are still assigned to
the FOP project. I never went looking deeper why this is so.

I hope I can soon have a look at your patch. ATM, I'm trying hard to
concentrate on what's really on my todo list. I'm so easily distracted
by all the feedback coming in. On one side, it's very good to have it
because it shows me that we're actually more stable than I thought. On
the other side, I can't handle the load alone anymore. I need help.
Looks like I packed my bag too full.

On 13.12.2005 10:02:45 Vincent Hennebert wrote:
 Well, that's just what I was wondering: Bugzilla doesn't seem to have
 made a notification on the fop-dev list. O_o
 You may find it directly on Bugzilla, bug number 35948. There's
 something I don't get: its status is still NEW but it doesn't appear
 when searching for the new bugs for Fop.
 
 Something I forgot to mention: there is still a little issue with
 transcoders: there is currently no means to configure the access to the
 font-config file. I'll post a note on this later today, in a dedicated
 thread.
 
 Thanks,
 Vincent
 
 
 Jeremias Maerki a écrit :
  Uhm, cool but where did you post your pre-patch? :-)
  
  On 12.12.2005 22:44:04 Vincent Hennebert wrote:
  
 Team,
 
 I've just posted an updated pre-patch of my FOray adaptation work. I put
 it as a pre-patch because the junit tests don't run well anymore (about
 75 errors with junit-layout-standard). However, the pdf output looks
 right on the few tests I have run. The weird thing is that the XML
 renderer doesn't seem to get the same values for the area tree elements
 as the PDF renderer.
 
 For now I'm unable to find what's wrong. Perhaps that those who have a
 better knowledge of the layout part or of the test system will be able
 to give some hints? I'm going on searching but I think you can start
 looking at my modifications right now. I hope to find the problem soon.
 
 Normally the pdf, ps and AWT outputs should work well. The default
 font-config file may require some adaptation, especially for the AWT
 output. You can find informations in [1] and by me.
 
 Please don't hesitate to tell me if I've done things wrong or to ask any
 questions.
 
 Thanks,
 Vincent
 
 [1] http://www.axsl.org/font/configure.html
  
  
  
  
  Jeremias Maerki
  



Jeremias Maerki



Re: FOrayFont patch almost ready

2005-12-12 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Uhm, cool but where did you post your pre-patch? :-)

On 12.12.2005 22:44:04 Vincent Hennebert wrote:
 Team,
 
 I've just posted an updated pre-patch of my FOray adaptation work. I put
 it as a pre-patch because the junit tests don't run well anymore (about
 75 errors with junit-layout-standard). However, the pdf output looks
 right on the few tests I have run. The weird thing is that the XML
 renderer doesn't seem to get the same values for the area tree elements
 as the PDF renderer.
 
 For now I'm unable to find what's wrong. Perhaps that those who have a
 better knowledge of the layout part or of the test system will be able
 to give some hints? I'm going on searching but I think you can start
 looking at my modifications right now. I hope to find the problem soon.
 
 Normally the pdf, ps and AWT outputs should work well. The default
 font-config file may require some adaptation, especially for the AWT
 output. You can find informations in [1] and by me.
 
 Please don't hesitate to tell me if I've done things wrong or to ask any
 questions.
 
 Thanks,
 Vincent
 
 [1] http://www.axsl.org/font/configure.html



Jeremias Maerki