RE: FOP 0.93: Java Heap Space OutOfMemory

2007-07-09 Thread leeloo5e79-docbook
Seems there was not enough space on harddisk for
generating the PDF-Output with FOP 0.93.
Is there a option for FOP to display how many space on
harddisk is needed while generating a PDF?
This time over 200 MB were needed by FOP to generate a
less than 2 MB big PDF-File.

Regards,
Kerstin

--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:

 While generating a PDF from XML+XSL using FOP 0.93,
 FOP stops with Exception in thread main
 java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space. Are
 their any limitations set in FOP or this is just a
 problem of to few system memory?
 The generated PDF have more than 71 pages.
 
 
   
 -
 Besseren Schutz gegen Spam - jetzt bei dem neuen
 Yahoo! Mail .



  __  Die besten Tipps und Tricks fürs 
Grillen. BE A BETTER GRILLMEISTER! www.yahoo.de/clever

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: FOP from TRUNK: Hyphenation LineBreak-Problem???

2007-01-11 Thread leeloo5e79-docbook
Hi Manuel,

thanks for the fast fix. I update my fop-trunk-folder and tried to build fop 
with ant again. While building fop ant displays following message:
apache-ant-1.6.5/bin/ant: line 80: uname: command not found
Now trying to generate a pdf with FOP FOP just display this lines:
./FOP_TRUNK/fop: line 79: uname: command not found
./FOP_TRUNK/fop: line 91: basename: command not found
./FOP_TRUNK/fop: line 104: dirname: command not found
Exception in thread main java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: 
org/apache/fop/cli/Main

Did I something wrong because I tried to build FOP again with ANT??? Or is it 
just another mistake??

Best Regards,
Leeloo

PS: Yes, it's right Betrie-bsablauf is not separated correctly.

Manuel Mall [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: On Thursday 11 January 2007 17:55, 
Manuel Mall wrote:
 On Thursday 11 January 2007 14:00, malm wrote:
  leeloo5e79-docbook wrote:
   
   It could be that the new UAX#14 line breaking introduced after
   0.93 in late December is causing this. Can you please provide a
   full working testcase fo exhibiting the problem (if possible
   attached please not inlined with the message).
  
   Thanks

 Don't worry to send something else. The problem is caused by some
 interaction between the new UAX#14 linebreaking and hyphenation when
 explicit hyphens like in 'IT-System' are involved. I am looking at a
 fix.


Fix committed: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=495175

 BTW, looks like the German hyphenation pattern have some issues. To
 hyphenate 'Betriebsablauf' as 'Betrie-bsablauf' appears to be a bit
 unconventional.

   Manuel

 Manuel

Manuel

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
Was Sie schon immer wissen wollten aber nie zu Fragen trauten? Yahoo! Clever 
hilft Ihnen.

Re: FOP from TRUNK: Hyphenation LineBreak-Problem???

2007-01-11 Thread leeloo5e79-docbook
Hi Manuel,

maybe this was the problem. I tried again and now all was build fine. Maybe 
something wrong in my SSH-Client.
The head of the table looks fine now :-)))
Thanks a lot.

Best Regards,
Leeloo


Manuel Mall [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: On Thursday 11 January 2007 21:15, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi Manuel,

 thanks for the fast fix. I update my fop-trunk-folder and tried to
 build fop with ant again. While building fop ant displays following
 message: apache-ant-1.6.5/bin/ant: line 80: uname: command not found
 Now trying to generate a pdf with FOP FOP just display this lines:
 ./FOP_TRUNK/fop: line 79: uname: command not found
 ./FOP_TRUNK/fop: line 91: basename: command not found
 ./FOP_TRUNK/fop: line 104: dirname: command not found
 Exception in thread main java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
 org/apache/fop/cli/Main


This looks like a problem with your Unix path (or are you using cygwin?) 
because uname, dirname, basename are all Unix commands used in the 
shell script to start fop.

Also check the line endings in the shell script files. I think the Unix 
shells don't like script files with Windows cr/lf end of lines.

Manuel

 Did I something wrong because I tried to build FOP again with ANT???
 Or is it just another mistake??

 Best Regards,
 Leeloo

 PS: Yes, it's right Betrie-bsablauf is not separated correctly.

 Manuel Mall  schrieb:

 On Thursday 11 January 2007 17:55, Manuel Mall wrote:
  On Thursday 11 January 2007 14:00, malm wrote:
   leeloo5e79-docbook wrote:
It could be that the new UAX#14 line breaking introduced after
0.93 in late December is causing this. Can you please provide a
full working testcase fo exhibiting the problem (if possible
attached please not inlined with the message).
   
Thanks
 
  Don't worry to send something else. The problem is caused by some
  interaction between the new UAX#14 linebreaking and hyphenation
  when explicit hyphens like in 'IT-System' are involved. I am
  looking at a fix.

 Fix committed: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=495175

  BTW, looks like the German hyphenation pattern have some issues. To
  hyphenate 'Betriebsablauf' as 'Betrie-bsablauf' appears to be a bit
  unconventional.
 
Manuel
 
  Manuel

 Manuel

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]





   _

 Was Sie schon immer wissen wollten aber nie zu Fragen trauten? Yahoo!
 Clever
 
ans wers.yahoo.com  hilft Ihnen.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
NEU: Fragen stellen - Wissen, Meinungen und Erfahrungen teilen. Jetzt auf 
Yahoo! Clever.

Re: Update from Trunk Errors with FOP

2007-01-10 Thread leeloo5e79-docbook
Hi Jeremias,

thanks a lot for your answers :-) 

Update form Trunk works very fine now after setting the needed proxy in the 
TortoiseSVN. The First Download and Update from Trunk works without the 
Proxy-Settings. Maybe strange but never mind now.

My PDF-Output looks good at this moment. But maybe in further versions of FOP 
this warnings are no longer warnings but errors and no output are generated. 
Maybe I have a deeper look at the attributes to make a more decent FO-File for 
FOP.

Best Regards,
Leeloo

Jeremias Maerki [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: 
On 04.01.2007 15:33:45 leeloo5e79-docbook wrote:
 I still have a lot of errors using FOP in 0.92beta or better from Trunk I 
 think. Since a while I can't update from Trunk: TortoiseSVN said: 
 Error: PROPFIND request failed on '/repos/asf/xmlgraphics/fop/trunk'  
 Error: PROPFIND of '/repos/asf/xmlgraphics/fop/trunk': could not connect to 
 server (http://svn.apache.org)  
 Anything wrong with the server? Last year it worked fine.

The server could have been down for some reason. Just retry later. Or if
you're behind a proxy you may have to use https instead of http.

 First message I got while converting a XML to PDF is
 org.apache.fop.fo.flow.TableColumn bind
 WARNING: table-layout=fixed and column-width unspecified = falling back to 
 proportional-column-width(1)
 Deleting table-layout=fixed because it is not supported 
 (http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/compliance.html#fo-property-table-layout), 
 produces another error/warning:

Nono. You'll have to leave table-layout=fixed but you should specify
column-widths. But this warning can safely be ignored if you get the
expected output.

 WARNING: Warning(Unknown location): fo:table, table-layout=auto is 
 currently not supported by FOP
 04.01.2007 11:11:34 org.apache.fop.fo.PropertyList convertAttributeToProperty
 FATAL: Ignoring property: column-width=proportional-column-width(1) 
 (proportional-column-width() function may only be used when fo:table has 
 table-layout=fixed.; property:'column-width')
 What does this mean? Using column-with in fo:table which is supported by FOP 
 (http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/compliance.html#fo-property-column-width) 
 without table-layout=fixed produces an error. And using it with 
 table-layout=fixed because this is not support produces also an error. 
 Somebody is understanding this? And table-layout=auto are also not 
 supported.

Not an error, a warning. table-layout=auto is indeed not implemented,
yet, but fixed is. We're just nitpickers concerning your not
specifying column-widths in this case. :-)

 Next error seems to mean that the first row of a table is taller than the row 
 should be:
  org.apache.fop.layoutmgr.table.TableContentLayoutManager 
 createElementsForRowGroup
 WARNING: The contents of row 1 are taller than they should be (there is a 
 block-progression-dimension or height constraint on the indicated row). Due 
 to its contents the row grows to 76820 millipoints, but the row shouldn't get 
 any taller than MinOptMax[min=opt=max=14000] millipoints. (fo:table-row, no 
 context info available)
 For some tables I specified a column-width, maybe this could be the error. 
 But I do not specified the widths in millipoints but used proportional 
 measure. So, there should be no taller row than they should be, or !?
 After the next rows the error causes with FOP in the FO-File
 
 
 
 

I guess I should write an FAQ entry about that. You specify height on
the row. By using height you implicitely set
block-progression-dimension.minimum, block-progression-dimension.optimum
and block-progression-dimension.maximum to the same value (see
MinOptMax[min=opt=max=14000] above). Now, if your content gets larger
than 14pt (76.820pt in your case) in vertical direction the content
actually violates a constraint (maximum=14pt). The warning message
actually says pretty much that. You probably just didn't know that
height maps to block-progression-dimension. height is only a
corresponding property. Again, it's a warning, not an error, although
strictly speaking, it is a layout error. Depends on your nitpicking
level. :-)

To get rid of the warning the usual work-around is to use
block-progression-dimension.minimum=14pt instead of height=14pt.
This allows the table-row to grow as necessary while maintaining a
minimum height.

 Another error seems to have a problem with the PageBreakingAlgorithm:
 org.apache.fop.layoutmgr.PageBreakingAlgorithm updateData2
 WARNING: Part/page 1 overflows the available area in block-progression 
 dimension. (fo:static-content, no context info available)
 To engender a PageBreak, I'm using . 
 
 For the time being last error:
 org.apache.fop.layoutmgr.StaticContentLayoutManager doLayout
 WARNING: static-content overflows the available area. (fo:static-content, no 
 context info available)

Similar problem as with your table-row. Your content is larger than the
available area you defined for your header or footer. Set a
background-color

FOP from TRUNK: Hyphenation LineBreak-Problem???

2007-01-10 Thread leeloo5e79-docbook
Hello List,

after the update of FOP from TRUNK today, I've got a WARNING while generating 
a PDF-Output.
org.apache.fop.layoutmgr.inline.LineLayoutManager$LineBreakingAlgorithm 
updateData2
WARNUNG: Line 1 of a paragraph overflows the available area. (fo:block, 
Aggregierte Ausfallzeit IT-System)
 org.apache.fop.layoutmgr.inline.LineLayoutManager$LineBreakingAlgorithm 
updateData2
WARNUNG: Line 2 of a paragraph overflows the available area. (fo:block, 
IT-Anwendung, die IT-System benutzt)

This time this warning has effects on the real PDF-Output. It looks not very 
nice.
The table-cell in fo looks like this:
fo:table-cell padding-left=2pt padding-right=2pt padding-top=2pt 
padding-bottom=2pt border-bottom-width=0.5pt border-bottom-style=solid 
border-bottom-color=black border-right-width=0.5pt 
border-right-style=solid border-right-color=black 
text-align=centerfo:block font-weight=boldAggregierte Ausfallzeit 
IT-System/fo:block/fo:table-cell

The table cell in PDF-Output is broken like this:
Aggre-
gier-
te Aus-
fallzeit IT-System

and this

IT-Anwen-
dung, die IT-System 
benutzt

After correct hyphenation then on last or second line there is no normal break 
or another hyphenation. And so the available area is overflowing from this.
In the same table I have also long text which are separated and nothing is 
overflowing.

Using FOP 0.93 or the TRUNK-Version from beginning of december 2006 everything 
is fine.

Any suggestions?

Best Regards,
Leeloo



-
Der neue Internet Explorer 7 in deutscher Ausführung ist da!

Update from Trunk Errors with FOP

2007-01-04 Thread leeloo5e79-docbook
I still have a lot of errors using FOP in 0.92beta or better from Trunk I 
think. Since a while I can't update from Trunk: TortoiseSVN said: 
Error: PROPFIND request failed on '/repos/asf/xmlgraphics/fop/trunk'  
Error: PROPFIND of '/repos/asf/xmlgraphics/fop/trunk': could not connect to 
server (http://svn.apache.org)  
Anything wrong with the server? Last year it worked fine.

First message I got while converting a XML to PDF is
org.apache.fop.fo.flow.TableColumn bind
WARNING: table-layout=fixed and column-width unspecified = falling back to 
proportional-column-width(1)
Deleting table-layout=fixed because it is not supported 
(http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/compliance.html#fo-property-table-layout), 
produces another error/warning:
WARNING: Warning(Unknown location): fo:table, table-layout=auto is currently 
not supported by FOP
04.01.2007 11:11:34 org.apache.fop.fo.PropertyList convertAttributeToProperty
FATAL: Ignoring property: column-width=proportional-column-width(1) 
(proportional-column-width() function may only be used when fo:table has 
table-layout=fixed.; property:'column-width')
What does this mean? Using column-with in fo:table which is supported by FOP 
(http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/compliance.html#fo-property-column-width) 
without table-layout=fixed produces an error. And using it with 
table-layout=fixed because this is not support produces also an error. 
Somebody is understanding this? And table-layout=auto are also not supported.

Next error seems to mean that the first row of a table is taller than the row 
should be:
 org.apache.fop.layoutmgr.table.TableContentLayoutManager 
createElementsForRowGroup
WARNING: The contents of row 1 are taller than they should be (there is a 
block-progression-dimension or height constraint on the indicated row). Due to 
its contents the row grows to 76820 millipoints, but the row shouldn't get any 
taller than MinOptMax[min=opt=max=14000] millipoints. (fo:table-row, no context 
info available)
For some tables I specified a column-width, maybe this could be the error. But 
I do not specified the widths in millipoints but used proportional measure. So, 
there should be no taller row than they should be, or !?
After the next rows the error causes with FOP in the FO-File
fo:table-column column-number=1 column-width=proportional-column-width(1)/
fo:table-column column-number=2 column-width=proportional-column-width(0)/
fo:table-column column-number=3 column-width=proportional-column-width(1)/
fo:table-bodyfo:table-row height=14pt

Another error seems to have a problem with the PageBreakingAlgorithm:
org.apache.fop.layoutmgr.PageBreakingAlgorithm updateData2
WARNING: Part/page 1 overflows the available area in block-progression 
dimension. (fo:static-content, no context info available)
To engender a PageBreak, I'm using fo:block break-after=page/. 

For the time being last error:
org.apache.fop.layoutmgr.StaticContentLayoutManager doLayout
WARNING: static-content overflows the available area. (fo:static-content, no 
context info available)

While writing this rows I found out, that this error occurs in the following 
row of the generated FO-File: 
fo:page-sequence xmlns:axf=http://www.antennahouse.com/names/XSL/Extensions; 
master-reference=body hyphenate=true language=de format=1 
initial-page-number=1 force-page-count=no-force hyphenation-character=- 
hyphenation-push-character-count=2 hyphenation-remain-character-count=3
fo:static-content flow-name=xsl-region-before-first
fo:block font-family=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif,Symbol,ZapfDingbats 
margin-left=0pt
fo:table width=100% table-layout=fixed
fo:table-column column-number=1 column-width=proportional-column-width(1)/
fo:table-column column-number=2 column-width=proportional-column-width(0)/
fo:table-column column-number=3 column-width=proportional-column-width(1)/
fo:table-body ...

I don't know why this error occurs. This XSL:FO is generated from the 
Docbook-XSL I think.

Maybe these are all trivial errors/warings - However PDF is generated. But it 
let being to suspicious. Has anybody some explanations? Or these are just 
faults whereof is still working?

Thanks a lot!

Best Regards,
Leeloo

 __
Do You Yahoo!?
Sie sind Spam leid? Yahoo! Mail verfügt über einen herausragenden Schutz gegen 
Massenmails. 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

Re: fo:table-row is missing child elements

2007-01-02 Thread leeloo5e79-docbook
Hi Glen,

running FOP 0.92beta with the option

-r  relaxed/less strict validation (where available)
now generates a PDF without the error described below :-)))

Thanks and happy new year.

Best Regards,
Leeloo

Glen Mazza [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:

 Trying to convert an FO-File which was generated by FOP 0.92beta to an 
 PDF just stopped with following Error Message:
 javax.xml.transform.TransformerException: 
 org.apache.fop.fo.ValidationException: file:///test/test.fo:1:43655: 
 Error(1/43655): fo:table-row is missing child elements.
 Required Content Model: (table-cell+)
 

Process of elimination is probably best here:  keep minimizing your FO 
file until you identify the element causing the error to occur.

There is also an option I believe in FOP 0.93 to run in non-strict 
validation mode, which would I believe would accept the situation that 
is occurring for you.

 I can't find any fo:table-row in FO-File which missed a fo:table-cell. I 
 think everything is alright. Using FOP 0.20.5 converting the XML to PDF 
 - it works fine.
 

The new FOP raises an error by default, as protection in case you goofed 
up your XSLT template calls and ended up creating no cells where you 
actually wanted some.  This way erroneously created invoices with no 
rows, for example, won't end up going out to the customer, or if you 
create a 250 page document you don't have to manually read each page 
just to make sure every table has the rows you intended.

Glen

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



 __
Do You Yahoo!?
Sie sind Spam leid? Yahoo! Mail verfügt über einen herausragenden Schutz gegen 
Massenmails. 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

Re: fo:table-row is missing child elements

2007-01-02 Thread leeloo5e79-docbook
Yes, it is the Docbook-XSL-Stylesheet 1.71.1 which causes this error.

But strange to say using -r-mode a xml-file is created by FOP with the 
Docbook-XSL very well another one using the same Docbook-XSL and -r-mode causes 
the fo:table-row is missing child elements-error. It's all very confusing me.

Regards,
Leeloo

Glen Mazza [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: Hmmm...judging from your email address, 
I hope it is not a docbook 
stylesheet that is requiring you to run in -r mode.  I would send a 
bug report to the OASIS docbook team if it is.

Glen


[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi Glen,
 
 running FOP 0.92beta with the option
 
 -r  relaxed/less strict validation (where available)
 
 now generates a PDF without the error described below :-)))
 
 Thanks and happy new year.
 
 Best Regards,
 Leeloo
 
 */Glen Mazza /* schrieb:
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
 
   Trying to convert an FO-File which was generated by FOP 0.92beta
 to an
   PDF just stopped with following Error Message:
   javax.xml.transform.TransformerException:
   org.apache.fop.fo.ValidationException: file:///test/test.fo:1:43655:
   Error(1/43655): fo:table-row is missing child elements.
   Required Content Model: (table-cell+)
  
 
 Process of elimination is probably best here: keep minimizing your FO
 file until you identify the element causing the error to occur.
 
 There is also an option I believe in FOP 0.93 to run in non-strict
 validation mode, which would I believe would accept the situation that
 is occurring for you.
 
   I can't find any fo:table-row in FO-File which missed a
 fo:table-cell. I
   think everything is alright. Using FOP 0.20.5 converting the XML
 to PDF
   - it works fine.
  
 
 The new FOP raises an error by default, as protection in case you
 goofed
 up your XSLT template calls and ended up creating no cells where you
 actually wanted some. This way erroneously created invoices with no
 rows, for example, won't end up going out to the customer, or if you
 create a 250 page document you don't have to manually read each page
 just to make sure every table has the rows you intended.
 
 Glen
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 __
 Do You Yahoo!?
 Sie sind Spam leid? Yahoo! Mail verfügt über einen herausragenden Schutz 
 gegen Massenmails.
 http://mail.yahoo.com
 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



 __
Do You Yahoo!?
Sie sind Spam leid? Yahoo! Mail verfügt über einen herausragenden Schutz gegen 
Massenmails. 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

fo:table-row is missing child elements

2006-12-21 Thread leeloo5e79-docbook
Trying to convert an FO-File which was generated by FOP 0.92beta to an PDF just 
stopped with following Error Message:
javax.xml.transform.TransformerException: 
org.apache.fop.fo.ValidationException: file:///test/test.fo:1:43655: 
Error(1/43655): fo:table-row is missing child elements. 
Required Content Model: (table-cell+)

I can't find any fo:table-row in FO-File which missed a fo:table-cell. I think 
everything is alright. Using FOP 0.20.5 converting the XML to PDF - it works 
fine.

Trying to convert the XML directly to PDF using FOP 0.92beta, I got some 
additional WARNINGS:
Mismatch: table-row (http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Format) vs. block 
(http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Format)
Mismatch: table-row (http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Format) vs. flow 
(http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Format)
Mismatch: table-row (http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Format) vs. page-sequence 
(http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Format)
Mismatch: table-row (http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Format) vs. root 
(http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Format)


Any suggestions?

Best regards,
Leeloo


-
Yahoo! Messenger -  kostenlos* mit Familie und Freunden von PC zu PC 
telefonieren. 

FOPException: No element found for Namespace URI:

2006-12-08 Thread leeloo5e79-docbook
On Wednesday this week I downloaded the actual files from FOP Trunk and 
compiled FOP using ANT.

Now I'm trying to convert an XML-File to PDF or RTF with FOP but this occurs 
still this Error: 
org.apache.fop.apps.FOPException: Error(Unknown location): No element mapping 
definition found for (Namespace URI: http://xml.apache.org/fop/extensions;, 
Local Name: destination)

If I create first ein FO-File with xsltproc and then trying to generate an RTF, 
this error ocurrs:
org.apache.fop.apps.FOPException: file:///root/FOP/test.fo:2:28782: 
Error(2/28782): No element mapping definition found for (Namespace URI: 
http://xml.apache.org/fop/extensions;, Local Name: destination)

In FO-File on line 2 and at character 28782 I found this: 
fox:destination internal-destination=id2508829/
   ^ = 
character 28782

Using FOP 0.20.5 converting the same XML- and FO-File to PDF works fine.

Using the example files at directory examples converting it to rtf works fine 
with FOP 0.92.

Best Regards,
Leeloo





-
Besseren Schutz gegen Spam - jetzt bei dem neuen Yahoo! Mail .

FOPException: No element found for Namespace URI:

2006-12-08 Thread leeloo5e79-docbook
On Wednesday this week I downloaded the actual files from FOP Trunk and 
compiled FOP using ANT.

Now I'm trying to convert an XML-File to PDF or RTF with FOP but this occurs 
still this Error: 
org.apache.fop.apps.FOPException: Error(Unknown location): No element mapping 
definition found for (Namespace URI: http://xml.apache.org/fop/extensions;, 
Local Name: destination)

If I create first ein FO-File with xsltproc and then trying to generate an RTF, 
this error ocurrs:
org.apache.fop.apps.FOPException: file:///root/FOP/test.fo:2:28782: 
Error(2/28782): No element mapping definition found for (Namespace URI: 
http://xml.apache.org/fop/extensions;, Local Name: destination)

In FO-File on line 2 and at character 28782 I found this: 
fox:destination  internal-destination=id2508829/
   ^ = 
character 28782

Using FOP 0.20.5 converting the same XML- and FO-File to PDF works fine.

Using the example files at directory examples converting it to rtf works fine 
with FOP 0.92.

Best Regards,
Leeloo

-
Was Sie schon immer wissen wollten aber nie zu Fragen trauten? Yahoo! Clever 
hilft Ihnen.