Re: Extra fo:inline introduces extra new lines
On Thursday 14 September 2006 21:05, Florent Georges wrote: Hi I discovered the following issue with FOP 0.92beta (but I'm not sure it is an issue). With the following two blocks, I get two different results: fo:block text-align=left padding-bottom=0pt padding-top=0pt start-indent=3pt end-indent=3pt linefeed-treatment=preserve fo:inline linefeed-treatment=preserveBMW modele Date de mise en circulation: 1/9/1979 fo:inlineKm: /fo:inline27000/fo:block fo:block text-align=left padding-bottom=0pt padding-top=0pt start-indent=3pt end-indent=3pt linefeed-treatment=preserve fo:inline linefeed-treatment=preserveBMW modele fo:inlineDate de mise en circulation: /fo:inline1/9/1979 fo:inlineKm: /fo:inline27000/fo:block As far as I can tell neither of the two examples above is valid XSL-FO. In both cases a /fo:inline appears to be missing. Which makes me suspicious that this is not really the exact input given to FOP to produce the output you attached, You can see the result in attachment (the second block is the one with extra newlines in the result). Is it the expected behaviour? Regards, --drkm Manuel - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Extra fo:inline introduces extra new lines
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi In both blocks one closing /fo:inline is missing. How you generate the FO file? Stefan Florent Georges schrieb: Hi I discovered the following issue with FOP 0.92beta (but I'm not sure it is an issue). With the following two blocks, I get two different results: fo:block text-align=left padding-bottom=0pt padding-top=0pt start-indent=3pt end-indent=3pt linefeed-treatment=preserve fo:inline linefeed-treatment=preserveBMW modele Date de mise en circulation: 1/9/1979 fo:inlineKm: /fo:inline27000/fo:block fo:block text-align=left padding-bottom=0pt padding-top=0pt start-indent=3pt end-indent=3pt linefeed-treatment=preserve fo:inline linefeed-treatment=preserveBMW modele fo:inlineDate de mise en circulation: /fo:inline1/9/1979 fo:inlineKm: /fo:inline27000/fo:block You can see the result in attachment (the second block is the one with extra newlines in the result). Is it the expected behaviour? Regards, --drkm ___ Découvrez un nouveau moyen de poser toutes vos questions quelque soit le sujet ! Yahoo! Questions/Réponses pour partager vos connaissances, vos opinions et vos expériences. http://fr.answers.yahoo.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFCVitirQ0Ts08AdMRAilGAJ943VHsDoiDgLoB0+AErwU1g52vfACgmp7A 6zCw31Xc3QX85JVSSIDPWEE= =i4eN -END PGP SIGNATURE- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Extra fo:inline introduces extra new lines
-Original Message- From: Florent Georges [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 3:05 PM Hi I discovered the following issue with FOP 0.92beta (but I'm not sure it is an issue). With the following two blocks, I get two different results: fo:block text-align=left padding-bottom=0pt padding-top=0pt start-indent=3pt end-indent=3pt linefeed-treatment=preserve fo:inline linefeed-treatment=preserveBMW modele Date de mise en circulation: 1/9/1979 fo:inlineKm: /fo:inline27000/fo:block fo:block text-align=left padding-bottom=0pt padding-top=0pt start-indent=3pt end-indent=3pt linefeed-treatment=preserve fo:inline linefeed-treatment=preserveBMW modele fo:inlineDate de mise en circulation: /fo:inline1/9/1979 fo:inlineKm: /fo:inline27000/fo:block You can see the result in attachment (the second block is the one with extra newlines in the result). Is it the expected behaviour? Regards, Tested on both FOP 0.92 (works badly) and FOP_TRUNK (works fine), this has been corrected in latest code Pascal - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Extra fo:inline introduces extra new lines
Pascal Sancho wrote: Hi Tested on both FOP 0.92 (works badly) and FOP_TRUNK (works fine), this has been corrected in latest code Ok, thanks for the info. I'll wait for 0.93 to add this functionality. And thanks to Stefan and Manuel: you're right, my samples were not well-formed (my fault, while simplifying the code to post). BTW, thanks to all FOP developers and fop-users contributors for your time. Regards, --drkm ___ Découvrez un nouveau moyen de poser toutes vos questions quelque soit le sujet ! Yahoo! Questions/Réponses pour partager vos connaissances, vos opinions et vos expériences. http://fr.answers.yahoo.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
