Pascal Sancho wrote:
Hi
> Tested on both FOP 0.92 (works badly) and FOP_TRUNK (works
> fine), this has been corrected in latest code
Ok, thanks for the info. I'll wait for 0.93 to add this
functionality. And thanks to Stefan and Manuel: you're right, my
samples were not well-formed (my fault, while simplifying the code to
post).
BTW, thanks to all FOP developers and fop-users contributors for your
time.
Regards,
--drkm
___________________________________________________________________________
Découvrez un nouveau moyen de poser toutes vos questions quelque soit le sujet
!
Yahoo! Questions/Réponses pour partager vos connaissances, vos opinions et vos
expériences.
http://fr.answers.yahoo.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
