Re: PNG resolution not resolved?
Hmm, that's almost the same environment. That rules out a buggy codec implementation. And FOP 0.95 behaves correctly as far as I've seen. Maybe your expectations are wrong: If you generate an image at say 72x72 pixels and set the resolution to 72 dpi, you get an image with an intrinsic size of exactly 1 inch. If you save it with 300dpi (but the image is still 72x72 pixels), the image's intrinsic size naturally gets smaller (you have more pixels per inch). On 04.11.2008 13:53:20 Florent Georges wrote: Jeremias Maerki wrote: A short test with your back.png shows no problems on my machine (WinXP, Sun JVM 1.6.0_03 and Sun JVM 1.4.2_16). Thanks for the response. I am on Win XP SP 2, Sun JVM 1.6.0_01. It could be that on your machine, a ImageIO PNG codec is running that is not properly reporting the image resolution. How can I give you more info about that? Regards, -- Florent Georges http://www.fgeorges.org/ Jeremias Maerki - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PNG resolution not resolved?
Can you tell me what JVM (maker and version) and operating system you're using? We have unit tests that make sure that we extract resolution information correctly from various bitmaps (including PNG). A short test with your back.png shows no problems on my machine (WinXP, Sun JVM 1.6.0_03 and Sun JVM 1.4.2_16). It could be that on your machine, a ImageIO PNG codec is running that is not properly reporting the image resolution. On 04.11.2008 12:38:57 Florent Georges wrote: Hi, It seems that FOP 0.95 does not resolve correctly the resolution of the enclosed image. The resolution of this file is 300 dpi, but it seems FOP uses its default 72 dpi. If I save the image with 72 dpi, the result is ok. I can just use content-width=400% for now, or save the image with 72 dpi for the documentation, but I thought that is maybe a bug of FOP. Hope that helps, -- Florent Georges http://www.fgeorges.org/ Jeremias Maerki - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PNG resolution not resolved?
Jeremias Maerki wrote: Maybe your expectations are wrong: If you generate an image at say 72x72 pixels and set the resolution to 72 dpi, you get an image with an intrinsic size of exactly 1 inch. If you save it with 300dpi (but the image is still 72x72 pixels), the image's intrinsic size naturally gets smaller Yes, that's interesting. Actually this is not my own issue, I was helping a client and thought to report here what I thought was a problem. But that makes sense. I'll forward this idea to him. Anyway, thanks for the help, -- Florent Georges http://www.fgeorges.org/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PNG resolution not resolved?
Jeremias Maerki wrote: A short test with your back.png shows no problems on my machine (WinXP, Sun JVM 1.6.0_03 and Sun JVM 1.4.2_16). Thanks for the response. I am on Win XP SP 2, Sun JVM 1.6.0_01. It could be that on your machine, a ImageIO PNG codec is running that is not properly reporting the image resolution. How can I give you more info about that? Regards, -- Florent Georges http://www.fgeorges.org/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PNG resolution not resolved?
Hi, It seems that FOP 0.95 does not resolve correctly the resolution of the enclosed image. The resolution of this file is 300 dpi, but it seems FOP uses its default 72 dpi. If I save the image with 72 dpi, the result is ok. I can just use content-width=400% for now, or save the image with 72 dpi for the documentation, but I thought that is maybe a bug of FOP. Hope that helps, -- Florent Georges http://www.fgeorges.org/ inline: back.png- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
