Re: [fossil-users] fossil server for timeline will return empty result for some parameters max
Unfortunately I'm unable to distribute the repo, which is also quite large (~730mb .fossil file, 93k commits). Are there additional measures I can take to get diagnostic information? Christopher On Mar 17, 2015, at 7:09 PM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: On 3/17/15, die.drachen die.drac...@gmail.com wrote: With fossil 1.31 [2e7c40dbdd] on OSX I ran locally: $ fossil server Then on the timeline page for the Max field, when I enter values between 421-449, the server doesn't respond. Using curl: $ curl http://localhost:8080/timeline?n=421y=allv=0 http://localhost:8080/timeline?n=421y=allv=0 curl: (52) Empty reply from server Probably the code to compute the graph is segfaulting. Can you send me the repo that gives this error? Using values n421, n449 appear to work without problem. One thing I notice is that on the webpage for values 421 the graph appears, but values 449 there is no graph (presumably some threshold of complexity in the branches). I couldn't reproduce any problems when using the fossil timeline command, with parameters (not sure how y, v would map to parameters). Additionally, I couldn't find any documentation about where logs would go when running fossil server. I couldn't find logs anywhere to see if there was an issue. I saw a few other posts about timeline being problematic, but nothing that seemed to describe this same problem. Christopher -- D. Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] fossil server for timeline will return empty result for some parameters max
Thus said die.drachen die.drac...@gmail.com on Wed, 18 Mar 2015 00:58:41 -0400: Unfortunately I'm unable to distribute the repo, which is also quite large (~730mb .fossil file, 93k commits). Are there additional measures I can take to get diagnostic information? You could ensure that core files are allowed (check ulimit -c in the environment where you start Fossil server). Then watch for a core file and use gdb to provide the output of backtrace: $ gdb fossil fossil.core bt ... Thanks, Andy -- TAI64 timestamp: 4000550907c5 ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] Fossil security question from a newbie
The repo is an open SQLite db. You can browse it easily with any 3rd party SQLite viewer/editor or your own code. The passwords are hashed but available. As are the user settings. So, someone could edit the user guest cap to 'as' and do whatever. Better to encrypt the repo when in transit. On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 11:44 PM, Byung-Jae Kwak byung.k...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, Suppose I have .fossil file on a thumb drive and I lost it. If all the privileges of all the accounts in the repository have been disabled except for the admin account, and the admin account is protected with a fairly strong password, can I assume the content in the repository is reasonably safe? BJ ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] Fossil security question from a newbie
No, the authentication/authorisation is only to protect if the repository is accessed over a protocol (http, command line etc.), if someone has direct access to the file, they have access to _all_ of the repository data. To protect any file on a USB drive against theft or loss, you'll need to either _encrypt_ the USB drive or a subset of its file-system that contains the .fossil file. If you are on Linux you can look into dm-crypt for full-disk encryption: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dm-crypt Or eCryptfs for file-system level encryption: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ECryptfs Cheers. - Vikrant On 18 March 2015 at 09:14, Byung-Jae Kwak byung.k...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, Suppose I have .fossil file on a thumb drive and I lost it. If all the privileges of all the accounts in the repository have been disabled except for the admin account, and the admin account is protected with a fairly strong password, can I assume the content in the repository is reasonably safe? BJ ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
[fossil-users] Fossil security question from a newbie
Hello, Suppose I have .fossil file on a thumb drive and I lost it. If all the privileges of all the accounts in the repository have been disabled except for the admin account, and the admin account is protected with a fairly strong password, can I assume the content in the repository is reasonably safe? BJ ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] Xekri skin: weird dropdowns on timeline page in Opera
Yes, '-o-display: block' fixes the issue. But only when there is no 'display:flex'. What's the 'hide-from-opera' css hack? - Tontyna Am 17.03.2015 um 02:04 schrieb Andrew Moore: Hello Tontyna! Thank you for the information about the problem you ran into with the Xekri skin. I don't have access to Opera, so I can not test any fixes to make sure it would work equally on Chrome and Firefox. A possible fix which uses -o-display: block for the div.submenu has been pushed to the skin-xekri branch. Please let me know if it works for you and I am open to any suggestions for a better solution. Andrew On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 5:54 PM, Tontyna tont...@ultrareal.de mailto:tont...@ultrareal.de wrote: Opera (12.17/Win32) produces gigantic selects -- see attached screenshot. Culprit is the display: flex property of div.submenu - Tontyna ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org mailto:fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] Xekri skin: weird dropdowns on timeline page in Opera
Opera is not my favourite browser. The outdated instance is a relic. I run into the funny dropdowns when I (to no avail) tried to reproduce Albert's issue with fossil ui not working with recent chrome browser resp. Richies Missing timeline graph above 36 timeline items with all the browsers that happen to be on my computer. Cf. current thread on Browser support ;) - Tontyna Am 17.03.2015 um 04:59 schrieb Vikrant Chaudhary: The current version of Opera is 28, you should probably update your Browser. You are using a 2 year old version which comes with Presto engine (development of which is now discontinued by Opera), while newer versions use Blink engine. Cheers. - Vikrant On 17 March 2015 at 04:24, Tontyna tont...@ultrareal.de wrote: Opera (12.17/Win32) produces gigantic selects -- see attached screenshot. Culprit is the display: flex property of div.submenu - Tontyna ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
[fossil-users] Bug: fossil configuration pull doesn't pull all ticket reports
When using fossil configuration pull ticket --overwrite with source repository which has default All Tickets report and one custom report, only custom report is pulled and not the default report. So target repository loses the default All Tickets report. This also makes custom report have different rn in the two repositories (rn=2 in source repository and rn=1 in target repository). I think that this should be fixed so that after pull both repositories have exact same ticket reports with exact same rn numbers. Fossil version: 1.32 linux executable OS: Debian Wheezy STEPS TO REPRODUCE fossil init source.fossil fossil ui source.fossil # Add custom ticket report, leave server open # - source repository now has All Tickets report (rn=1) and custom report (rn=2) fossil init target.fossil fossil configuration pull ticket --overwrite http://localhost:PORT -R target.fossil fossil ui target.fossil # target repository now has only custom report (rn=1), not All Tickets report -- Markus Laire https://sites.google.com/site/malaire ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] fossil ui not working with recent chrome browser
Hello, On 17 March 2015 at 03:07, a...@gmx-topmail.de a...@gmx-topmail.de wrote: -Can you use a different Windows computer? I did, and there I don't have the problem (I'm sick and write this from home, I probably will do more tests with other computers/browsers in the next days once I'm back to work...) Create a new Windows profile on the computer you do have available and see if the problem occurs with a brand now fossil repo. Get well soon! -- --- inum: 883510009027723 sip: jungleboo...@sip2sip.info xmpp: jungle-boo...@jit.si ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] Browser support
On 17/03/15 06:20, Warren Young wrote: On Mar 16, 2015, at 11:15 AM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: The timeline graph is drawn using JS. Without JS you do not get the very nice timeline graph. I don't see any reasonable way around that. Hi, it’s the resident pro web app developer checking in again. :) There are at least three ways to create the timeline without Javascript. 1. Build the timeline as a dynamic PNG on the server side, then serve the client a URL to that dynamic PNG. This requires libpng or similar, some line-drawing API on top of that (e.g. libgd, SDL, etc.), and ideally a place to cache the generated PNG so it doesn’t have to be re-generated until a timeline update invalidates it. We actually have code doing this, written before the next two options became widely available. We’ll get around to rewriting it RSN. 2. Generate the timeline server-side as SVG, and serve it inline on the timeline page. Of the mainstream browsers with significant market share, only IE8 doesn’t support SVG: http://caniuse.com/#search=svg The only reason there’s still a significant chunk of IE8 out there is that that’s the last version of IE that will run on XP. No developer should still be running an unsupported 13 year old OS on his desktop anyway. There is an SVG shiv for IE8 - maybe more than one. Some people at large organisation still have support for XP (MS call it custom support or something similar and charge a LOT for it) and may not have a choice. 3. Generate the timeline via canvas. Yes, technically this is one of those spiffy HTML5 features, but it’s actually about as well supported as SVG these days: http://caniuse.com/#search=canvas Only option 1 will work for Tim's favorite browser, Dillo, but…ugh. The effort needed seems excessive to compared to Dillo's user base. Fossil should not *require* any of the latest HTML5 stuff. A few years ago I would have agreed with you, but browsers have come a long way recently, what with all the new competition. I’m all for supporting “ancient” browsers, as long as they still render standard HTML, CSS and JS code correctly. Our own web app finally dropped Firefox 2 support recently, moving the low bar up to Firefox 3, because we found a case where 2 wasn’t doing the right thing with some perfectly reasonable code. I don’t think it’s unreasonable to require a browser released 6 years ago at minimum. We have too many good browsers available these days to be continuing to bend over backwards with browser compatibility hacks. You have to be able to draw some line in the sand, some minimum level of required features. I think IE9 makes a pretty good target. Although it’s only 4 years old now, it was about 3 years behind the rest of the mainstream browser world at the time, in terms of HTML, CSS JS feature compatibility. (Yes, about equal to Firefox 3, Safari 3, and Chrome 1.0!) IE9 is the newest IE that still runs on the oldest supported version of Windows, Vista, which will be in “extended support” for another couple of years. This does rule out XP support for sites unwilling to switch from IE, but I don’t think such people are Fossil’s target market anyway. Incidentally, if you’re looking for ways to test with versions of IE you otherwise wouldn’t have access to, visit: https://www.modern.ie/ You wouldn’t know it from the URL, but it’s actually a Microsoft service, offering legitimate testing versions of Windows pre-loaded with specific versions of IE. An especially nice feature is that it can generate images in any of several VM formats: VirtualBox, OVA (VMware), Hyper-V, Parallels… It is very useful and as far as I am concerned the best thing MS has done for years. ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] GitHub question. Was: Git-v-Fossil.
On 16 March 2015 at 23:08, Joerg Sonnenberger jo...@britannica.bec.de wrote: On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 11:01:21PM +0100, mario wrote: Social network is a nice metaphor. But it's also just a side-effect of having a data silo. Actually, I think that's the far bigger item. GitHub has managed something which SourceForge never had -- a stable service. Most developer interactions center around the issue tracker. Which is pretty. And often just used as discussion board with ticket numbers. That's not my experience with GitHub. Until recently, the issue tracker was a bad joke. The central communication medium on GitHub was always the pull queue... Either way, github has managed these things: 1) it's a general purpose place to publish any code (with relatively reliable service) 2) it's a place to get feedback for your code (in whatever form) that is usable SF fails in 2) due to their bug tracker being a bad joke to this date and lack of any pull request tracker. LP fails in 1) due to their focus on Ubuntu. Also it seems that focus on pull requests rather than traditional bug reports was a good move on part of github. It was a void they have filled with their service. Thanks Michal ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] fossil ui not working with recent chrome browser
Am 17.03.2015 um 01:43 schrieb jungle Boogie: Hi, On 14 March 2015 at 05:12, a...@gmx-topmail.de a...@gmx-topmail.de wrote: This is what does show the problems for me (on Windows 7): fossil init test.fossil fossil ui test.fossil then use chrome version 41.0.2272.89 m to navigate to e.g. the new ticket page, of which only the summary inputfield and Type-combobox are shown. Same page and setup shows correctly with e.g. firefox. I'm using Fossil 1.32, Windows 7 home premium, Google Chrome 42.0.2311.39 beta-m and Mozilla Firefox 36.0.1. With your above steps, I cannot reproduce what you're describing. Both browsers display the /tktnew identically. Time to rule out some things. -Can you send the repo to anyone? I have included it as an attachement, there is nothing special about it, I just did fossil init and fossil ui (or serve). -Can you use a different Windows computer? I did, and there I don't have the problem (I'm sick and write this from home, I probably will do more tests with other computers/browsers in the next days once I'm back to work...) -fossil init test.fossil on a non-Windows computer and load the repo on your Windows computer, what's it look like? I did that and see the same problem. I also see the problem when I access a repository that was created and is served from a linux box (accessed through an ssh-tunnel). -Try Fossil 1.32 already tried that, same outcome (incomplete pages). I probably once more should emphasize that this does not happen when I use firefox on the same computer. One more thing I will try once I'm back to work is whether I see the same problems when I run fossil as CGI from apache... Albert tst.fossil Description: Binary data ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] Browser support
On Mon, 16 Mar 2015 13:15:00 -0400 Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: I agree that Fossil ought to be usable (though perhaps with reduced functionality, such as no timeline graph) even with very old and primitive browsers. Fossil should not *require* any of the latest HTML5 stuff. Certainly it is free to take advantage of those new features if they are available, but Fossil should still be usable without them. It is not only an issue with the old vs new browsers. I know several people, that prefer to disable JS even on new browsers because of security reasons. Unfortunately, the browsers does not allow disabling JS on site base, so even trusted web sites get disabled. On the other hand HTML5 and CSS for these users are OK. Another observation about such users is that they think that logging-in in fossil will need some kind of registration they are not willing to do. This way they simply never click on login link and never read the instructions on the login page, ending with heap of honey-pot links and not able to navigate the repository. -- http://fresh.flatassembler.net http://asm32.info John Found johnfo...@asm32.info ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] fossil ui not working with recent chrome browser
Am 16.03.2015 um 12:22 schrieb Richard Hipp: On 3/16/15, a...@gmx-topmail.de a...@gmx-topmail.de wrote: 6) my own remote fossil standalone instances on Linux server - incomplete pages for all browsers except firefox, which shows complete pages Are you able to set up a such an instance that we can access to investigate the problem? no, unfortunately not at the moment (I'm sick and writing this from home). I probably can do that when I'm back to work... But I honestly doubt that you would see the problems: My colleagues access the same instances with no problems (they are also on windows and at least use some of the browser versions which I have problems with). I will let them test with all browsers that I have problems with when I'm back to work... Albert ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] possible error
On 3/17/15, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 5:52 PM, Ramon Ribó ram...@compassis.com wrote: Usage: c:\other\binutils\fossil.exe sync ?URL? URL must be defined if it has not been already defined with previous invocations of commands remote-url, sync, pull, or push That shouldn't be necessary. i have always (since 2007) just done: That won't handle a case where the repo comes to you by (eg) having the backing sqlite db copied into place as in a cp, email attachment, etc. fossil clone http://... foo.fsl mkdir foo cd foo fossil open ../foo.fsl and then the remote URL is automatically set to the clone source with no additional fiddling needed. -- - stephan beal http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/ http://gplus.to/sgbeal Freedom is sloppy. But since tyranny's the only guaranteed byproduct of those who insist on a perfect world, freedom will have to do. -- Bigby Wolf ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] Is whiki a fossil admin user interface?
It doesn't look like it's (directly) related to fossil. It's a project of notable fossil hacker Stephan Beal, but that's it. On Mar 17, 2015 6:39 PM, heat...@trans-world.org wrote: Hello, I am a bit confused, Is whiki http://whiki.wanderinghorse.net/?page=whiki a fossil admin user interface to manage fossil website??? ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
[fossil-users] Is whiki a fossil admin user interface?
Hello, I am a bit confused, Is whiki http://whiki.wanderinghorse.net/?page=whiki a fossil admin user interface to manage fossil website??? ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] fossil ui not working with recent chrome browser
Am 17.03.2015 um 21:08 schrieb jungle Boogie: Hello, On 17 March 2015 at 03:07, a...@gmx-topmail.de a...@gmx-topmail.de wrote: -Can you use a different Windows computer? I did, and there I don't have the problem (I'm sick and write this from home, I probably will do more tests with other computers/browsers in the next days once I'm back to work...) Create a new Windows profile on the computer you do have available and see if the problem occurs with a brand now fossil repo. Get well soon! New user sounds like a good idea! I'm 100% shure it's not the repo. It must be something else on the computer. One more idea: How many fossil.exe do you see in the TaskManager when the corruption occurs? I know it sounds silly, but in the last months I had strange adventures with Windows services and same port in use by more than one application... - Tontyna ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] fossil enterprise git features missing
Ah, her question was the reverse, taking features of git and adding to fossil. On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 3:41 PM, jungle Boogie jungleboog...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Heather, On 17 March 2015 at 15:30, heat...@trans-world.org wrote: Hello, on fossil website you say that fossil is designed for smaller and non-hierarchical teams and is meant for real small project compare to git, in this case is there any way to add to fossil the same features as git has? Git is licensed under some gpl and fossil is under BSD so you can take things from Fossil and put into Git! http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/doc/trunk/COPYRIGHT-BSD2.txt -- --- inum: 883510009027723 sip: jungleboo...@sip2sip.info xmpp: jungle-boo...@jit.si ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users -- Andreas Kupries Senior Tcl Developer Code to Cloud: Smarter, Safer, Faster™ F: 778.786.1133 andre...@activestate.com, http://www.activestate.com Learn about Stackato for Private PaaS: http://www.activestate.com/stackato ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] fossil enterprise git features missing
On 3/17/15, heat...@trans-world.org heat...@trans-world.org wrote: Hello, on fossil website you say that fossil is designed for smaller and non-hierarchical teams and is meant for real small project compare to git, in this case is there any way to add to fossil the same features as git has? Can you be more specific about what feature you have in mind? -- D. Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] Missing timeline graph above 36 timeline items (?!)
On Monday 16 Mar 2015 12:07:58 Richard Hipp wrote: On 3/16/15, Richie Adler richiead...@gmail.com wrote: After the latest upgrades, I've been unable to see the timeline graphs if I have more than 36 items in the timeline. The space for the graph remains, but nothing is drawn. The weirdest thing is that I have reverted to old versions and I'm still unable to see the full graph! I can see it in the Fossil site which is running the same version, though... In another thread (fossil ui not working with recent chrome browser) there are reports of truncated pages when running on Windows. But so far, none of the developers have been able to reproduce the problem. If you can show us how to repro the problem, we'll fix it right away. I reported similar a while ago: http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.fossil-scm.user/19356 It looks very similar to this issue here. Roy ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
[fossil-users] fossil server for timeline will return empty result for some parameters max
With fossil 1.31 [2e7c40dbdd] on OSX I ran locally: $ fossil server Then on the timeline page for the Max field, when I enter values between 421-449, the server doesn't respond. Using curl: $ curl http://localhost:8080/timeline?n=421y=allv=0 http://localhost:8080/timeline?n=421y=allv=0 curl: (52) Empty reply from server Using values n421, n449 appear to work without problem. One thing I notice is that on the webpage for values 421 the graph appears, but values 449 there is no graph (presumably some threshold of complexity in the branches). I couldn't reproduce any problems when using the fossil timeline command, with parameters (not sure how y, v would map to parameters). Additionally, I couldn't find any documentation about where logs would go when running fossil server. I couldn't find logs anywhere to see if there was an issue. I saw a few other posts about timeline being problematic, but nothing that seemed to describe this same problem. Christopher___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] fossil server for timeline will return empty result for some parameters max
On 3/17/15, die.drachen die.drac...@gmail.com wrote: With fossil 1.31 [2e7c40dbdd] on OSX I ran locally: $ fossil server Then on the timeline page for the Max field, when I enter values between 421-449, the server doesn't respond. Using curl: $ curl http://localhost:8080/timeline?n=421y=allv=0 http://localhost:8080/timeline?n=421y=allv=0 curl: (52) Empty reply from server Probably the code to compute the graph is segfaulting. Can you send me the repo that gives this error? Using values n421, n449 appear to work without problem. One thing I notice is that on the webpage for values 421 the graph appears, but values 449 there is no graph (presumably some threshold of complexity in the branches). I couldn't reproduce any problems when using the fossil timeline command, with parameters (not sure how y, v would map to parameters). Additionally, I couldn't find any documentation about where logs would go when running fossil server. I couldn't find logs anywhere to see if there was an issue. I saw a few other posts about timeline being problematic, but nothing that seemed to describe this same problem. Christopher -- D. Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
[fossil-users] fossil enterprise git features missing
Hello, on fossil website you say that fossil is designed for smaller and non-hierarchical teams and is meant for real small project compare to git, in this case is there any way to add to fossil the same features as git has? ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] fossil enterprise git features missing
Hi Heather, On 17 March 2015 at 15:30, heat...@trans-world.org wrote: Hello, on fossil website you say that fossil is designed for smaller and non-hierarchical teams and is meant for real small project compare to git, in this case is there any way to add to fossil the same features as git has? Git is licensed under some gpl and fossil is under BSD so you can take things from Fossil and put into Git! http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/doc/trunk/COPYRIGHT-BSD2.txt -- --- inum: 883510009027723 sip: jungleboo...@sip2sip.info xmpp: jungle-boo...@jit.si ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] fossil ui not working with recent chrome browser
Am 17.03.2015 um 21:01 schrieb a...@gmx-topmail.de: Is there something special Albert's system performs in its TMP folder? nothing that I know of. And it would have to be something that changed very recently, before about a week or so I didn't see these problems... My last Windows 7 update happened to be 5 days ago. And the next one is waiting for me to shutdown the computer. I'm not in the support team but I heard that last week some of our customers did have problems right after Win7 update. Will ask my colleagues for details. If that happened on my computer I'd recompile Fossil, commenting out the line #165 in winhttp.c : -- file_delete(zReplyFName); and have a look at the `fossil_server_P*_out*.txt` files. that's a good point. As I don't usually compile myself it might take a little before I can report what the outcome is... Did it right now. If you want I can e-mail the tweaked fossil.exe to you. You won't be really happy with the contents of the replyfiles. Fossil produces 'Content-Encoding: gzip'. But at least you can watch what files are produced when Firefox resp. Chrome requests the same page and compare their 'Content-Length'. Investigating the Windows Event Log might be another option. I tried to find anything interesting there, but was not successful. But the windows event log is not exactly something I understand very well, any pointers to what I should pay attention to are welcomed... Me too. I never find nothing there. Was just a stupid idea ;) - Tontyna, run out of ideas now and not alone with that :-), thanks for your efforts anyway... Albert Three cheers to jungle Boogie! He had yet another idea! ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] fossil ui not working with recent chrome browser
Am 17.03.2015 um 12:59 schrieb Tontyna: Am 16.03.2015 um 11:24 schrieb a...@gmx-topmail.de: I have now also made some additional tests: 1) local instance of a simple python webserver instance - complete pages for all browsers 2) remote instance of apache+trac - complete pages for all browsers 3) remote instance of apache+trac through ssh-tunnel - complete pages for all browsers 4) remote public fossil instances - complete pages for all browsers 5) local fossil instances (standalone server) on Win7 - incomplete pages for all browsers except firefox, which shows complete pages 6) my own remote fossil standalone instances on Linux server - incomplete pages for all browsers except firefox, which shows complete pages 7) my own remote fossil standalone instances on Linux server via ssh-tunnel - incomplete pages for all browsers except firefox, which shows complete pages 8) foreign remote fossil instances- complete pages with all browsers The above experiments indicate that CGI Fossil works and standalone server fails. So what's the difference between running standalone and CGI? Looking at the Fossil source code I see that in either case the response is produced by redirecting the output of fossil_system() into a temporary file, then send() the contents of that file back, and finally deleting the file. I'm not an expert in programming http servers and the likes. Only thinkering. Assuming send() isn't asynchronous and the fossil server is still running after an incomplete page I naively can imagine the following reasons for truncated html: 1. fossil_system() produces different output = Can't be because in Firefox the pages are complete 2. Sending the contents of the temporay file stops midways when standalone and not requested by Firefox. = Sounds like nonsense. The send()-loop sends until EOF. 3. The temporary file is truncated (or deleted) while Fossil is in the send-loop. = Hu?! 4. Fossil sends the complete response but Browser ignores the half of it. = Why should he? Are Chrome, IE, Opera more impatient than Firefox is? Is CGI delivery faster than standalone? Q: Does send() expect the receiver to commit? As I said: I'm not an expert. 5. Other forces that might interrupt a HTTPResponse? = ??? There is one difference between CGI and standalone I spotted: When I run Fossil standalone the output file is located in %LOCALAPPDATA%\Temp. When I run Fossil as CGI (Xampp) the temporary path is C:\xampp\tmp Is there something special Albert's system performs in its TMP folder? nothing that I know of. And it would have to be something that changed very recently, before about a week or so I didn't see these problems... If that happened on my computer I'd recompile Fossil, commenting out the line #165 in winhttp.c : -- file_delete(zReplyFName); and have a look at the `fossil_server_P*_out*.txt` files. that's a good point. As I don't usually compile myself it might take a little before I can report what the outcome is... Investigating the Windows Event Log might be another option. I tried to find anything interesting there, but was not successful. But the windows event log is not exactly something I understand very well, any pointers to what I should pay attention to are welcomed... - Tontyna, run out of ideas now and not alone with that :-), thanks for your efforts anyway... Albert ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] fossil ui not working with recent chrome browser
Am 16.03.2015 um 11:24 schrieb a...@gmx-topmail.de: I have now also made some additional tests: 1) local instance of a simple python webserver instance - complete pages for all browsers 2) remote instance of apache+trac - complete pages for all browsers 3) remote instance of apache+trac through ssh-tunnel - complete pages for all browsers 4) remote public fossil instances - complete pages for all browsers 5) local fossil instances (standalone server) on Win7 - incomplete pages for all browsers except firefox, which shows complete pages 6) my own remote fossil standalone instances on Linux server - incomplete pages for all browsers except firefox, which shows complete pages 7) my own remote fossil standalone instances on Linux server via ssh-tunnel - incomplete pages for all browsers except firefox, which shows complete pages 8) foreign remote fossil instances- complete pages with all browsers The above experiments indicate that CGI Fossil works and standalone server fails. So what's the difference between running standalone and CGI? Looking at the Fossil source code I see that in either case the response is produced by redirecting the output of fossil_system() into a temporary file, then send() the contents of that file back, and finally deleting the file. I'm not an expert in programming http servers and the likes. Only thinkering. Assuming send() isn't asynchronous and the fossil server is still running after an incomplete page I naively can imagine the following reasons for truncated html: 1. fossil_system() produces different output = Can't be because in Firefox the pages are complete 2. Sending the contents of the temporay file stops midways when standalone and not requested by Firefox. = Sounds like nonsense. The send()-loop sends until EOF. 3. The temporary file is truncated (or deleted) while Fossil is in the send-loop. = Hu?! 4. Fossil sends the complete response but Browser ignores the half of it. = Why should he? Are Chrome, IE, Opera more impatient than Firefox is? Is CGI delivery faster than standalone? Q: Does send() expect the receiver to commit? As I said: I'm not an expert. 5. Other forces that might interrupt a HTTPResponse? = ??? There is one difference between CGI and standalone I spotted: When I run Fossil standalone the output file is located in %LOCALAPPDATA%\Temp. When I run Fossil as CGI (Xampp) the temporary path is C:\xampp\tmp Is there something special Albert's system performs in its TMP folder? If that happened on my computer I'd recompile Fossil, commenting out the line #165 in winhttp.c : -- file_delete(zReplyFName); and have a look at the `fossil_server_P*_out*.txt` files. Investigating the Windows Event Log might be another option. - Tontyna, run out of ideas now ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] possible error
On 2015-03-17 17:06:33, Ramon Ribó wrote: fossil version This is fossil version 1.32 [302052d30b] 2015-02-20 08:30:51 UTC fossil sync Usage: c:\other\binutils\fossil.exe sync URL is it not possible to use sync without URL? It is, after you've stored your sync settings (i.e. who is to be your peer) in your local settings. You can see this url by issuing the fossil remote-url command, and can set it there, too, see fossil help remote-url. Sample would be fossil remote-url http://u...@ho.st:port/path/to/repo Have fun, -Martin ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] possible error
On Tue, 17 Mar 2015 17:06:33 +0100, Ramon Ribó ram...@compassis.com wrote: fossil version This is fossil version 1.32 [302052d30b] 2015-02-20 08:30:51 UTC fossil sync Usage: c:\other\binutils\fossil.exe sync URL is it not possible to use sync without URL? yes, if you have defined a remote URL via `fossil remote-url URL' it should work. RR ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users -- Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] Missing timeline graph above 36 timeline items (?!)
Andy Bradford decía, en el mensaje Re: [fossil-users] Missing timeline graph above 36 timeline items (?!) del 17/3/2015 1:48:13: Disabled NoScript and for more security restarted Firefox with no extensions enabled. Same thing. I wonder if perhaps some cross-site scripting blocking tool is blocking it? The only one was NoScript and it was disabled in safe mode. ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
[fossil-users] possible error
fossil version This is fossil version 1.32 [302052d30b] 2015-02-20 08:30:51 UTC fossil sync Usage: c:\other\binutils\fossil.exe sync URL is it not possible to use sync without URL? RR ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] possible error
OK. Thanks, Maybe the error message could be changed to: Usage: c:\other\binutils\fossil.exe sync ?URL? URL must be defined if it has not been already defined with previous invocations of commands remote-url, sync, pull, or push It looks strange that the help begins with: fossil help sync Usage: c:\other\binutils\fossil.exe sync ?URL? ?options? and the error message with: fossil sync Usage: c:\other\binutils\fossil.exe sync URL RR 2015-03-17 17:23 GMT+01:00 j. van den hoff veedeeh...@googlemail.com: On Tue, 17 Mar 2015 17:06:33 +0100, Ramon Ribó ram...@compassis.com wrote: fossil version This is fossil version 1.32 [302052d30b] 2015-02-20 08:30:51 UTC fossil sync Usage: c:\other\binutils\fossil.exe sync URL is it not possible to use sync without URL? yes, if you have defined a remote URL via `fossil remote-url URL' it should work. RR ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users -- Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
