Re: [fossil-users] Tech-note timeline commits
Thus said jungle boogie on Tue, 04 Jul 2017 15:03:01 -0700: > Now I greatly prefer the former, because when copying the hash with > the mouse, I can skip the closing (]) bracket, since I usually start > right-to-left. Not to derail your comments, but... Personally, I think that this is a flaw in web browsers and that they need to be improved to allow you to copy text from anywhere within an anchor tag instead of only allowing you to click it (or some other link-type action). There are many times when I would like to highlight text that is part of a hyperlink but have to finagle it in some fashion. Andy -- TAI64 timestamp: 4000595c6902 ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
[fossil-users] Tech-note timeline commits
Hi All, At this link, you'll notice the brackets containing the sha hash are not apart of the link: https://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/timeline?n=50&y=e&t=&ms=exact Compare that with regular commits here: https://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/timeline?y=ci Now I greatly prefer the former, because when copying the hash with the mouse, I can skip the closing (]) bracket, since I usually start right-to-left. I remember some discussion about the brackets being apart of the URL, and I'm not suggesting we re-visit that, just pointing out a difference between tech-notes and commits. Thanks, j.b. ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
