[fossil-users] push and sync not working
Hi, since I'm just starting to learn how to use Fossil, I'm running into some troubles; I experience some problems syncing the local repository with a remote one; actually, I just need to push local data on the remote repository. That's the remote setup: $ fossil new MYREPO.fsl project-id: a97eae2a62cdf5481a19a5dce6c9ab3e2c763d0e server-id: f26a799c43f6d82a99d1119b26a98567e0d04697 admin-user: paolo (initial password is b752cd) I then reference this remote repository file within a CGI: #! /usr/local/bin/fossil repository: /home/paolo/MYREPO.fsl From this setup, anything looks like I can checkout (actually: clone) the remote repository: fossil clone http://lulli.net/code/index.cgi LOCALrepo.fsl Bytes Cards Artifacts Deltas Send: 597 24 0 0 Received: 0 0 0 0 Total network traffic: 472 bytes sent, 464 bytes received Rebuilding repository meta-data... 0 (0%)... project-id: (null) server-id: 75cf3cfbb2855595de5874459f239c55b71218ee admin-user: paolo (password is 1a4411) So, I make: $ fossil open LOCALrepo.fsl and start adding code: $ mkdir A $ echo trytrytry A/try.txt $ fossil add A $ fossil commit So, under the local gui (fossil ui) I can see under FILES, the file A/try.txt. Since I live behind a proxy, I have to set : $ export http_proxy=http://localhost:3128 Then, I try to: fossil push http://lulli.net/code/index.cgi and get: via proxy: http://localhost:3128 Bytes Cards Artifacts Deltas Send: 90 1 0 0 Received: 0 1 0 0 Total network traffic: 315 bytes sent, 464 bytes received What I get is that local modifications don't get on the server in any way, and via the remote GUI I cannot see them. What am I missing, then ? May be it a matter of user privileges ? Thanks in advance, P. ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] push and sync not working
It seems like it's not actually cloning the repository (project-id: (null)). It seems you're right, as --httptrace says I'm not authorized to clone. But ... I can't figure out why can't I clone it. Any suggestion ? Maybe I miss some step in the manual ? [/cut] # 97AE3D1B86959B6B21D7281868C6AC0B50505FBF === HTTP RECEIVE: error not\sauthorized\sto\sclone === 1fossil: server says: not authorized to clone POST http://dev.lulli.net/code/repo/index.cgi/xfer HTTP/1.0 Host: dev.lulli.net User-Agent: Fossil/[f57990b65a] Content-Type: application/x-fossil-debug Content-Length: 691 login paolo 082882eb83a1bf2a069832e6acd60a6904a826be 87893c856c9ad3fd87c928a880b220e75ffa204f clone reqconfig css reqconfig header reqconfig footer reqconfig logo-mimetype reqconfig logo-image reqconfig project-name reqconfig project-description reqconfig index-page reqconfig timeline-block-markup reqconfig timeline-max-comment reqconfig ticket-table reqconfig ticket-common reqconfig ticket-newpage reqconfig ticket-viewpage reqconfig ticket-editpage reqconfig ticket-report-template reqconfig ticket-key-template reqconfig ticket-title-expr reqconfig ticket-closed-expr reqconfig @reportfmt reqconfig @user reqconfig @concealed reqconfig @shun # 97AE3D1B86959B6B21D7281868C6AC0B50505FBF ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] push and sync not working
On the web interface, under Setup/Users, which users have authority to clone? If you want to clone without given a userid and password, then nobody needs clone privilege. Otherwise, give a userid and password on the URL when cloning: Ok, I've just given 'nobody' the right to clone; it seems now that the error before disappear. But I continue to see project-id: (null) I'm sorry for annoying you about this, but once again: what do I miss ? (following the dump...) HTTP SEND: (http-trace-1.txt) POST http://dev.lulli.net/code/repo/repo.cgi/xfer HTTP/1.0 Host: dev.lulli.net User-Agent: Fossil/[f57990b65a] Content-Type: application/x-fossil-debug Content-Length: 691 login paolo 89e764e4b565c4c3e2761075180a1ee8f4eec2f7 ba6b7adbe6b5a1a9b93c03d674e8725c8af9f1a8 clone reqconfig css reqconfig header reqconfig footer reqconfig logo-mimetype reqconfig logo-image reqconfig project-name reqconfig project-description reqconfig index-page reqconfig timeline-block-markup reqconfig timeline-max-comment reqconfig ticket-table reqconfig ticket-common reqconfig ticket-newpage reqconfig ticket-viewpage reqconfig ticket-editpage reqconfig ticket-report-template reqconfig ticket-key-template reqconfig ticket-title-expr reqconfig ticket-closed-expr reqconfig @reportfmt reqconfig @user reqconfig @concealed reqconfig @shun # D458C547360B50EDDA34FF21BF86834CF69C9AA2 === Received: 0 0 0 0 Total network traffic: 870 bytes sent, 473 bytes received Rebuilding repository meta-data... 0 (0%)... project-id: (null) server-id: e13cca47836f69fe104f2e2562563c6a31dfd44e admin-user: paolo (password is 804622) ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] push and sync not working
It works. Making a lot of bad checkouts was misleading me... I find very useful the log you added; I have to dig more in the documentation, and play a little with user's privileges. but I also think it could be improved. About the product... it is simply GREAT ! Thank you very much, Paolo ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] https doesn't work through proxy?
It happened to me also not to be able to get a HTTP clone via proxy. I'm not sure, but everything went ok simply giving: fossil clone http://fossil-scm.org no-ssl.fsl --proxy wwwproxy:80 Without prior setting the 'proxy' var, nor exporting the http_proxy one. Maybe a bug on the proxy code ? Hope this could be of some help. Regards, Paolo Lulli 2010/1/22 altufa...@mail.com: $ fossil open ../fossil/fossil.fsl ssl $ make $ ./fossil version This is fossil version [652f20ef9c] 2010-01-21 22:03:24 UTC $ ./fossil set proxy wwwproxy:80 $ ./fossil clone http://fossil-scm.org no-ssl.fsl Bytes Cards Artifacts Deltas Send: 49 1 0 0 Received: 287173 6242 0 0 Send: 10025225 0 0 ^c $ ./fossil clone https://fossil-scm.org ssl.fsl Bytes Cards Artifacts Deltas Send: 49 1 0 0 ERROR. server says: 504 Gateway Timeout Send: 619 24 0 0 ^c Does fossil use proxy server for https URLs? Do I have to manually change any file (on top of ssl branch) to make fossil work with https:// URLs? - Altu ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] https doesn't work through proxy?
I just tried http . 2010/1/22 altufa...@mail.com: Hi, You tried with https:// or http://? http:// works well. ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
[fossil-users] Eclipse IDE
Hi, I thought I heard somebody long ago working on an Eclipse plugin for Fossil. Anybody knows ? Regards, Paolo Lulli ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] eclipse plugin for fossil
I would like to help ... P. 2011/2/21 Will West will.o.w...@gmail.com I'm thinking about writing an Eclipse plugin for Fossil, any interested collaborators, already started projects, or philosophical objections? The third category will be ignored :) -- Will Owen West ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] IMHO Fossil needs renaming...
I like both the name and the logo. Regards, P. 2011/3/2 John Found johnfo...@evrocom.net Hi all. First mail to this mail list. Please forgive my audacity - fossil is simply gorgeous just like SQLite, but it need to be renamed as soon as possible. :) My point is simple. IMHO, the name Fossil provokes some unpleasant associations and have not very propriate connotations. The same can be said for Fossil Logo - it is dark and have veri grim look. Just compare it with SQLite name and logo (btw - old logo and site of sqlite was better,now they are heavy :) ) Also look at other similar systems - Bazaar - makes allusion with crowds of developers. Mercurial - something very agive, quick, versatile. The name is important for the future of the every project. And if the name have to be changed - it is good to be made in earlier stages of development. So, mr.Hipp, please think a little about this arguments. Best Regards ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] Possibility of nicer diffs?
I'm going crazy trying to overcome the command-line-phobia of my coworkers; please, anything you can do to help me would be appreciated! I learned how to co-exist with that. I don't think there is a way to defeat it. -- www.lulli.net ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
