[Foundation-l] Invitations for Linkdin

2012-03-05 Thread Huib Laurens
Hello all,

It came to my attention that people are using wikimedia mailing lists as
there primary contact adres for Linkdin. I guess that this is not the way
it should be done.

Today I found:

Felix Reolon using wikimani...@lists.wikimedia.org  as there primary
e-mail.

i don't know him, but I'm sure somebody knows is him?

-- 
Kind regards,

Huib Laurens
WickedWay.nl

Webhosting the wicked way.
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] mobile website

2012-01-18 Thread Huib Laurens
So lets say that Wikipedia doesn't have a active anti vandal crew today,
but people can still edit within the English Wikipedia by mobile phone.

So we will find in a year all kind of vandal edits done today?
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] RESCHEDULED: Mailing lists server migration today

2012-01-18 Thread Huib Laurens
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo says the new version, so I
guess so


2012/1/18 Delphine Ménard notafi...@gmail.com

 On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 2:42 PM, Thomas Dalton thomas.dal...@gmail.com
 wrote:
  I advise you delay it again - we need the mailing lists at the moment
  to coordinate the blackout.

 Mark's email is 5 days old, so I suppose this has already happened, hasn't
 it?

 Cheers,

 Delphine





 --
 @notafish

 NB. This gmail address is used for mailing lists. Personal emails will get
 lost.
 Intercultural musings: Ceci n'est pas une endive -
 http://blog.notanendive.org
 Photos with simple eyes: notaphoto - http://photo.notafish.org

 ___
 foundation-l mailing list
 foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l




-- 
Kind regards,

Huib Laurens
WickedWay.nl

Webhosting the wicked way.
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] RESCHEDULED: Mailing lists server migration today

2012-01-18 Thread Huib Laurens
gmail is having troubles the last few weeks... I miss e-mails daily that
arrive much later...

On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Thomas Dalton thomas.dal...@gmail.comwrote:

 Just seen the datestamp... why did that email just come through now?!

 On 18 January 2012 13:42, Thomas Dalton thomas.dal...@gmail.com wrote:
  I advise you delay it again - we need the mailing lists at the moment
  to coordinate the blackout.
 
  On 13 January 2012 13:54, Mark Bergsma m...@wikimedia.org wrote:
  (rescheduled after the cancelled maintenance of last Friday)
 
  Hi,
 
  Today I will be migrating the mailing lists from a very old server
 (lily) in Amsterdam, to a new server (sodium) in our new Ashburn data
 center. Mailman will be upgraded to version 2.1.13 along the way.
 
  During the migration, mail will be delayed as all data will need to be
 transferred to the new host. No mail should go lost, but no new mails will
 be sent out during the process until done, and the web interface will be
 unavailable. This shouldn't take about one hour, if all goes well.
 
  I will report here when things should be back up and running.
 Afterwards, please let us know of any new issues, in bugzilla or on IRC
 (#wikimedia-tech). We don't expect any problems, but as with any software
 upgrade or migration, this can't be guaranteed...
 
  Thanks,
 
  --
  Mark Bergsma m...@wikimedia.org
  Lead Operations Architect
  Wikimedia Foundation
 
 
 
 
 
  ___
  foundation-l mailing list
  foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
  Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l

 ___
 foundation-l mailing list
 foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l




-- 
Kind regards,

Huib Laurens
WickedWay.nl

Webhosting the wicked way.
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] WMF blog post on Italian Wikipedia

2011-10-05 Thread Huib Laurens
snip
Therefore, each encyclopedia article and each course should explicitly grant
irrevocable permission for anyone to make verbatim copies available on
mirror sites. This permission should be one of the basic stated principles
of the free encyclopedia.

snip

That is already done with our free licensing...
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] WMF blog post on Italian Wikipedia

2011-10-05 Thread Huib Laurens
There is no content now, so there is no violation... You need to show the
content before you can violate anything.

I was responding on your part about giving the right to mirror, there is no
need for that cuz its already there. We even provide dumps for mirrors so
they can easy import a wikipedia version.

Best,

Huib
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] Dumps mirroring (was: Request: WMF commitment as a long term cultural archive?)

2011-09-21 Thread Huib Laurens
I would be happy to mirror. I was looking and poking arround for that a year
ago and the biggest problem for me is that its not clear how WikiMedia would
like to be mirrored.

We are currently a Centos and Ubuntu mirror on the machine. We have the
space, thats not the problem.


Best,

Huib Laurens
WickedWay.nl

2011/9/21 Brian J Mingus brian.min...@colorado.edu

 On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 3:45 AM, Strainu strain...@gmail.com wrote:

  2011/9/21 emijrp emi...@gmail.com:
   Hi all;
  
   Just like the scripts to preserve wikis[1], I'm working in a new script
  to
   download all Wikimedia Commons images packed by day. But I have limited
   spare time. Sad that volunteers have to do this without any help from
   Wikimedia Foundation.
  
   I started too an effort in meta: (with low activity) to mirror XML
  dumps.[2]
   If you know about universities or research groups which works with
   Wiki[pm]edia XML dumps, they would be a possible successful target to
  mirror
   them.
  
   If you want to download the texts into your PC, you only need 100GB
 free
  and
   to run this Python script.[3]
  
   I heard that Internet Archive saves XML dumps quarterly or so, but no
   official announcement. Also, I heard about Library of Congress wanting
 to
   mirror the dumps, but not news since a long time.
  
   L'Encyclopédie has an uptime[4] of 260 years[5] and growing. Will
   Wiki[pm]edia projects reach that?
  
   Regards,
   emijrp
  
   [1] http://code.google.com/p/wikiteam/
   [2]
 http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mirroring_Wikimedia_project_XML_dumps
   [3]
  
 
 http://code.google.com/p/wikiteam/source/browse/trunk/wikipediadownloader.py
   [4] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uptime
   [5] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Encyclop%C3%A9die
  
  
 
  Hi emirjrp,
 
  I can understand why you would prefer to have full mirrors of the
  dumps, but let's face it, 10TB is not (yet) something that most
  companies/universities can easily spare. Also, most people only work
  on 1-5 versions of Wikipedia, the rest is just overhead to them.
 
  My suggestion would be to accept mirrors of a single language and have
  a smart interface at dumps.wikimedia.org that redirects requests to
  the location that is the best match for the user. This system is used
  by some Linux distributions (see download.opensuse.org for instance)
  with great success.
 
  Regards,
Strainu
 
  ___
  foundation-l mailing list
  foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
  Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
 


 Perhaps a torrent setup would be successful in this case.


 --
 Brian Mingus
 Graduate student
 Computational Cognitive Neuroscience Lab
 University of Colorado at Boulder
 ___
 foundation-l mailing list
 foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l




-- 
Kind regards,

Huib Laurens
WickedWay.nl

Webhosting the wicked way.
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


[Foundation-l] Transfer a domain to the foundation

2011-08-31 Thread Huib Laurens
Hello,

I currently have the domain www.wikilovesmonuments.com in my possession.

I'm am willing to transfer this domain to the foundation, but I don't really
know who to contact, and IRC didn't help me. Can somebody point me to the
right person or can the right person contact me on: h...@wickedway.nl


-- 
Kind regards,

Huib Laurens
WickedWay.nl

Webhosting the wicked way.
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


[Foundation-l] Wikimedia used for SPAM

2011-08-25 Thread Huib Laurens
Hi!

I''m getting this kind of e-mails since yesterday... Did they use the list
of people on those lists to mail this?

They use foundation-l, commons-l en wikitech-l

best,

Huib
-- Forwarded message --
From: foundation-l-ow...@lists.wikimedia.org
Date: 2011/8/25
Subject: Working Part Time


We are recruiting!

We offer part-time or full-time positions in EU.
Currently our team of specialists is developing progressive and innovative
method of cooperating
with our client thus we are expanding our network of representatives all
over Europe.

We offer fully paid training sessions to guide you through your work,
competitive salary,
free work schedule and other benefits which will make your cooperating with
us extremely pleasant.

If you want to join our company, you should have a good command of English,
and you must make sure you hold European residence and you possess a strong
desire to work.

Once you have decided to join us, please provide us your contact information
and we will contact you shortly to schedule an interview.

Our contact:  nicko...@world-jobsearch.com

Thank you for your interest!






-- 
Kind regards,

Huib Laurens
WickedWay.nl

Webhosting the wicked way.
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] help openstreetmap to translate their license ...

2011-08-22 Thread Huib Laurens
Isn't it normal practice to place above the legal text a note like this is
a translated text and it can be incorrect. Please see the language version
for the offical version ?

2011/8/22 Tomasz Ganicz polime...@gmail.com

 2011/8/22 Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijs...@gmail.com:
  Hoi,
  Much of OpenStreetMap is localised at translatewiki.net ... A license
 can be
  translated as well. Given that OSM is already done at twn, it is just
  another addition.

 Yess.. but legal code should rather be translated by professional
 lawyer or at least revised and accepted. Otherwise the translated text
 is worth nothing from legal POV.

 --
 Tomek Polimerek Ganicz
 http://pl.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Polimerek
 http://www.ganicz.pl/poli/
 http://www.cbmm.lodz.pl/work.php?id=29title=tomasz-ganicz

 ___
 foundation-l mailing list
 foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l




-- 
Kind regards,

Huib Laurens
WickedWay.nl

Webhosting the wicked way.
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] Call for referendum

2011-08-21 Thread Huib Laurens
At the time of the License Commitee with the vote we had te results
also very fast...

Dude... Its all possible when they check all the votes made on day 1
on day 2 etc etc... And the system is very simple to work with.

Best,

Huib


2011/8/21, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen cimonav...@gmail.com:
 On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 3:08 AM, Philippe Beaudette
 phili...@wikimedia.org wrote:
 On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen 
 cimonav...@gmail.com wrote:


 So why announce ridiculously unrealistic timeframe between the vote
 concluding and the results being announced?


 First, I disagree that it's ridiculously unrealistic.  Vote checking has
 already started and will continue throughout the polling.  Second,
 hindsight
 is 20/20.  I'll tell you that it's a balancing act... we've gotten it
 right
 a few times and we've gotten it wrong a few times.  It's been years since
 this  type of all-projects election was held for anything but a Board of
 Trustees election, and so, yeah, mistakes will be made.  But let's just
 wait
 and see on the timeframe, shall we?  No doubt an extension will have to
 happen, but what's the harm?  If we take a couple extra days to
 announce
 the results, who has been harmed?

'

 Months, not extra days, dude.


 --
 --
 Jussi-Ville Heiskanen, ~ [[User:Cimon Avaro]]

 ___
 foundation-l mailing list
 foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


-- 
Verzonden vanaf mijn mobiele apparaat

Kind regards,

Huib Laurens
WickedWay.nl

Webhosting the wicked way.

___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


[Foundation-l] Fwd: Image filter referendum

2011-08-19 Thread Huib Laurens
Hello,

I just recieved this e-mail while I'm not enigble to vote and not able to
remove myself from the list.

I guess if I recieve it more people that aren't engible will recieve it.

Best.
Huib

-- Forwarded message --
From: Wikimedia Referendum, 2011 impr...@wikimedia.org
Date: 2011/8/19
Subject: Image filter referendum
To: Abigor abi...@forgotten-beauty.com


Dear Abigor,

You are eligible to vote in the image filter referendum, a referendum to
gather more input into the development and usage of an opt-in personal image
hiding feature. This feature will allow readers to voluntarily screen
particular types of images strictly for their own accounts.

Its purpose is to enable readers to easily hide images on the Wikimedia
projects that they do not wish to view, either when first viewing the image
or ahead of time through individual preference settings. The feature is
intended to benefit readers by offering them more choice, and to that end it
will be made as user-friendly and simple as possible. We will also make it
as easy as possible for editors to support. For its development, we have
created a number of guiding principles, but trade-offs will need to be made
throughout the development process. In order to aid the developers in making
those trade-offs, we need your help us assess the importance of each by
taking part in this referendum.

For more information, please see
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image_filter_referendum/en. To remove
yourself from future notifications, please add your user name at
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_nomail_list.



-- 
Kind regards,

Huib Laurens
WickedWay.nl

Webhosting the wicked way.
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] Image filter referendum

2011-08-19 Thread Huib Laurens
Yep, I just got a second for a very old account

Beste SterkeBak,

U bent stemgerechtigd in het referendum over de afbeeldingsfilter. In dit
referendum wordt getracht meer input te krijgen voor de ontwikkeling en het
gebruik van een optionele functie die gebruikers in staat stelt om bepaalde
soorten afbeeldingen voor hun account te verbergen.

Het doel hiervan is de lezers de gelegenheid te geven om bepaalde
afbeeldingen op de Wikimediaprojecten, die zij niet willen zien, te
verbergen. Dit kan bij de eerste keer dat de afbeelding bekeken wordt of
voor de afbeelding getoond wordt, door middel van persoonlijke
voorkeursinstellingen. De functie is bedoeld om lezers het voordeel van de
keuze te laten. Daarom zal deze functie zo gebruiksvriendelijk en simpel als
mogelijk gemaakt worden. We maken het ook het ondersteunen door redacteuren
zo gemakkelijk mogelijk. Voor de ontwikkeling hebben wij een aantal
principes, maar er zullen in de loop van het ontwikkelingsproces
compromissen moeten worden gesloten. Om het ontwikkelen te vergemakkelijken
vragen we uw hulp bij het beoordelen van elk principe naar belangrijkheid.

Voor meer informatie, zie 
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image_filter_referendum/nl. Om uzelf van
deze lijst uit te schrijven en zo geen toekomstige meldingen te ontvangen
kan u uw gebruikersnaam toevoegen op 
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_nomail_list.

And my bot recieved one... Something is going wrong there...

Best,

Huib

2011/8/19 Huib Laurens sterke...@gmail.com

 Hello,

 I just recieved this e-mail while I'm not enigble to vote and not able to
 remove myself from the list.

 I guess if I recieve it more people that aren't engible will recieve it.

 Best.
 Huib

 -- Forwarded message --
 From: Wikimedia Referendum, 2011 impr...@wikimedia.org
 Date: 2011/8/19
 Subject: Image filter referendum
 To: Abigor abi...@forgotten-beauty.com


 Dear Abigor,

 You are eligible to vote in the image filter referendum, a referendum to
 gather more input into the development and usage of an opt-in personal image
 hiding feature. This feature will allow readers to voluntarily screen
 particular types of images strictly for their own accounts.

 Its purpose is to enable readers to easily hide images on the Wikimedia
 projects that they do not wish to view, either when first viewing the image
 or ahead of time through individual preference settings. The feature is
 intended to benefit readers by offering them more choice, and to that end it
 will be made as user-friendly and simple as possible. We will also make it
 as easy as possible for editors to support. For its development, we have
 created a number of guiding principles, but trade-offs will need to be made
 throughout the development process. In order to aid the developers in making
 those trade-offs, we need your help us assess the importance of each by
 taking part in this referendum.

 For more information, please see
 http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image_filter_referendum/en. To remove
 yourself from future notifications, please add your user name at
 http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_nomail_list.



 --
 Kind regards,

 Huib Laurens
 WickedWay.nl

 Webhosting the wicked way.





-- 
Kind regards,

Huib Laurens
WickedWay.nl

Webhosting the wicked way.
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] Wikimedia Referendum 2011 mailout — issues

2011-08-19 Thread Huib Laurens
Hi,

Maybe we shouldn't e-mail every user every time there is a vote.

There has never been a run that didn't cause any problems and like
Andrew was saying elsewhere they know the system doesn't check for
global blocks and multible blocks.

So there will be a lot of false positives. And a lot of people will
get spam because they did create a account and did some edits...
People that think Wikimedia is sending spam will leave instead of
vote.

There is already a global site notice. This e-mails was't needed...


2011/8/19, Andrew Garrett agarr...@wikimedia.org:
 Hi all,

 I've just started sending out over 750,000 emails to folks who are
 eligible to vote in our Wikimedia Referendum. I've learned from past
 mailouts in trying to exclude more bots, multiple accounts and folks
 who've already voted. However, if you receive an email which doesn't
 apply to you (for example, if you're not eligible to vote, or you've
 requested to be excluded from such mailouts), or if there's a problem
 with the email that you receive (for example, it's in the wrong
 language), I've set up a page [1] where you can report it. Remember
 that you can always opt out from all future mailings [2].

 I'm hoping that having a central page for this information will help
 in investigating the issues associated with errant mail, and allow
 future mail to be better targetted.

 Thanks a lot for your help,

 —Andrew

 [1]
 http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image_filter_referendum/Email/False_positives
 [2] http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_nomail_list

 --
 Andrew Garrett
 Wikimedia Foundation
 agarr...@wikimedia.org

 ___
 foundation-l mailing list
 foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


-- 
Verzonden vanaf mijn mobiele apparaat

Kind regards,

Huib Laurens
WickedWay.nl

Webhosting the wicked way.

___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] Vladimir V. Medeyko WANTED

2011-08-11 Thread Huib Laurens
What is there to know?

2011/8/11 Gora Kazanskaya kaz.g...@yandex.ru

 Anybody knows something about the user Drbug (Vladimir V. Medeyko) after
 the Wikimania 2011?

 Kazanskaya Gora.

 ___
 foundation-l mailing list
 foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l




-- 
Kind regards,

Huib Laurens
WickedWay.nl

Webhosting the wicked way.
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] The problem with Incubator: An interactive journey

2011-08-08 Thread Huib Laurens
SPQRobin is already working on a extension that will point
xxx.wikipedia.org to the right place on Incubator. The first version
is already deployed and he showed me the new version on WikiMania.


I'm not sure how long it will take, when wmf staff will help him out
it will take less time. But a beter version is being worked on.


2011/8/8, Thomas Goldammer tho...@googlemail.com:
 Maybe a new system of incubation would be helpful. For example, one
 could start the requested wikis on their future domain
 (xxx.wikipedia.org / xxx.wiktionary.org etc.pp.) right from the
 request, with at least two voluntary experienced supervisors on each
 (one can supervise more than one of these of course) who get sysop and
 crat rights and stay there as long as it takes to get the approval of
 LangCom for an independent wiki (that is, after translating the most
 important parts of the MW software and that stuff). With email
 notification, the community of the test project can easily reach the
 supervisors and they of course should be in the wiki on a daily basis
 to look that everything is ok there. In the best case, they could try
 to attract more native speakers of the language to work there. Then a
 closing request for a wiki that became inactive would just be a
 request for supervision of that wiki. That means, the wiki stays where
 it is, but gets two supervisors who take on the administrative tasks
 and start some promotion maybe. Well, it's just an idea.

 BR
 Th.

 ___
 foundation-l mailing list
 foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


-- 
Verzonden vanaf mijn mobiele apparaat

Kind regards,

Huib Laurens
WickedWay.nl

Webhosting the wicked way.

___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] The problem with Incubator: An interactive journey

2011-08-08 Thread Huib Laurens
I'm not sure about interwiki's

if the project xxx.wikipedia.org/wiki/article will point to
incubator.wikimedia.org/wiki/wp/xxx/article I guess it would be possible to
use the [[:xxx:]] interwiki? Cuz it wouldn't directly point the incubator.
So I guess it would be possible... But some changes need to be done in the
interwiki.py maybe? It doesn't sounds really impossible to me...



2011/8/8 Thomas Goldammer tho...@googlemail.com

 Well, that idea also came to my mind (I didn't know that someone is
 already working on it), but then interwikis wouldn't be possible,
 would they? I think interwiki links are not unimportant to get native
 or fluent speakers of a language to a wiki who are currently working
 on other wikis. If they are working on enwiki already, for example,
 and discover that there is an article about their topics in their own
 language (or a language they are fluent in), they might go there and
 maybe improve the article and stay for more work. (I mean I did react
 like this when I discovered some articles about my topics on enwiki,
 maybe others wouldn't... ^^)

 But for starters, the redirect thing will work, too. One had to make
 sure that these wikis are properly listed and linked to in as many
 places as possible so that the wiki-finding problems M. Williamson has
 pointed out are solved.

 BR
 Th.

 2011/8/8 Huib Laurens sterke...@gmail.com:
  SPQRobin is already working on a extension that will point
  xxx.wikipedia.org to the right place on Incubator. The first version
  is already deployed and he showed me the new version on WikiMania.
 
 
  I'm not sure how long it will take, when wmf staff will help him out
  it will take less time. But a beter version is being worked on.
 

 ___
 foundation-l mailing list
 foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l




-- 
Kind regards,

Huib Laurens
WickedWay.nl

Webhosting the wicked way.
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] The problem with Incubator: An interactive journey

2011-08-08 Thread Huib Laurens
There is a complete list here:
http://incubator.wikimedia.org/wiki/Incubator:Wikis I guess it would be easy
to add a status to it... And link the meta pages back to the list.

2011/8/8 Thomas Goldammer tho...@googlemail.com

 There should be a general overview page where all projects are listed
 with a very short description in the respective languages and a status
 (open, under supervision, closed, in preparation or what else
 you get), could be hosted on Meta. And this Wikimedia projects
 summary or such can be prominently linked from the main pages, like
 there are Wikipedias in xxx languages, find out more HERE or
 something accordingly in the other projects.

 BR
 Th.

 2011/8/8 M. Williamson node...@gmail.com:
  This is an improvement in many ways, but how does it help the average
 user?
  How are people supposed to know that XYZ code points to XYZ language?
 Right
  now we don't have any high-traffic pages pointing to incubator; it seems
  less likely that say, en.wp main page will link to every single test
 wiki.

 ___
 foundation-l mailing list
 foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l




-- 
Kind regards,

Huib Laurens
WickedWay.nl

Webhosting the wicked way.
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


[Foundation-l] Abigor Account

2011-08-07 Thread Huib Laurens
Hello,

On WikiMania it was brought to my attention by a user that there is a
account Abigor langcom. He asked me why I created that account...

Since editting meta is blocked for me, I would like to state here after
asking to a trusted user how I should react that this account is not created
by me. And I would like to see it blocked (if not already done so) and a
checkuser preformed so we can see who created it.

Thank you,

-- 
Kind regards,

Huib Laurens
WickedWay.nl
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] Greg Kohs and Peter Damian

2011-07-23 Thread Huib Laurens
 to gagging people, it just gives more
 credit to the people being gagged and makes people wonder if there is
 any merit in what they say.

 This brings up my favorite subject of unneeded deletions versions needed
 ones.

 Of course there is material that should be deleted that is hateful,
 Spam etc, lets call that evil content.

 But the articles that i wrote and my friends wrote that were deleted
 did not fall into that category, they might have been just bad or not
 notable.

 We have had a constant struggle to keep our articles from being
 deleted in a manner that we consider unfair. Additionally, the bad
 content is lost and falls into the same category as evil content.

 Also there should be more transparency on deleted material on the
 Wikipedia itself, there is a lot of information that is being deleted
 and gone forever without proper process or review.

 In my eyes there is a connection between the two topics, the banning
 of people and the deleting of information. Both are depriving people
 from information that they want and need in an unfair manner.

 Instead of articles about obscure events, things, and old places in
 Kosovo you have a wikipedia full of the latest information about every
 television show, is that what you really want?

 I think there should be room for things in places that are not not
 notable because they are not part of mainstream pop culture, we also
 need to support the underdogs of Wikipedia even if they are not
 mainstream, Mr Kohs definitely has something to say and I would like
 like to hear it. And the Kosovars have something to say even if the
 Serbs don't want to hear it. The Albanians have something to say even
 if the Greeks don't want to hear it, etc. There are many cases of
 people from Kosovo and Albania driven out of Wikipedia and depriving
 the project of important information because they are not able to get
 started and the contributions are so far way from the dominating
 political viewpoint of the opposite side that they don't even get a
 chance to be heard.

 We need to make a way for these people to be heard and to moderate the
 conflicts better, that will make Wikipedia stronger and more robust.

 thanks,
 mike




 --
 James Michael DuPont
 Member of Free Libre Open Source Software Kosova http://flossk.org
 ___
 foundation-l mailing list
 foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


-- 
Verzonden vanaf mijn mobiele apparaat

Kind regards,

Huib Laurens
WickedWay.nl

Webhosting the wicked way.

___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] Going to far

2011-07-19 Thread Huib Laurens
Did you even read the E-mail? How should the Ombudsman commission handle
this case, it are administrators copying personal information into Wikimedia
Wiki's...


2011/7/18 MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com

 Huib Laurens wrote:
  I regret the fact that I need to e-mail to this list, but I tried and
 tried
  but can't work it out with the people involved. I talked about letting it
 go
  but that doesn't seem the right thing to do also, so maybe a discussion
 on
  this list can make something happen.

 I can't imagine you regret sending this e-mail as much as I regret trying
 to
 parse it. From what I can tell, this list isn't the appropriate forum.
 Whatever your issue is, it's buried beneath a wall of text and what appears
 to be years of antics on your part.

 If you have reason to believe that the Wikimedia privacy policy has been
 violated, you should contact the Ombudsman commission:
 http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Ombudsman_commission.

 If you would like to have certain information removed from a particular
 Wikimedia wiki, you can try contacting the wiki's oversighters or
 Arbitration Committee. If you've ruined or soured those relationships to
 the
 point that those individuals are unwilling to respond, then that's a bed of
 your own making and you'll simply have to live with the consequences of
 your
 actions.

 You're also free to contact individual members of Wikimedia Foundation
 staff
 or OTRS, but there doesn't appear to be much (if anything) that needs to be
 discussed that relates to the purpose or mission of this mailing list.

 MZMcBride



 ___
 foundation-l mailing list
 foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l




-- 
Kind regards,

Huib Laurens
WickedWay.nl

Webhosting the wicked way.
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


[Foundation-l] Going to far

2011-07-18 Thread Huib Laurens
Hello,

I regret the fact that I need to e-mail to this list, but I tried and tried
but can't work it out with the people involved. I talked about letting it go
but that doesn't seem the right thing to do also, so maybe a discussion on
this list can make something happen.

First a starter, I'm not going to spin around it... I'm currently blocked on
Commons, nl.wiki en Meta for privacy violation and using multible accounts.
But now here it comes, when I want to talk about the privacy about the
people around me no body is responding. If I messed up, and that still a big
maybe I'm happy to go down and get a bad reputation into Google and all
the other search engines but people around me should be safe.

Currently there are lots of pointers to my girlfriend on NL.Wiki, Meta and
Commons. While the article and the picture was hers she had nothing to do
with the complete case some people made here. As you will understand I will
not call her by her name since otherwise we have yet another place where her
name is listed and indexed into Google.

It all started on the Dutch Wikipedia after somebody created a article about
the Dutch writer and somebody did a CheckUser and came to the conclusion
that Delay and me had a common source. After that a Dutch Administrator
Freaky Fries came with the news that I had a relationship with this person
and that we would live on the same adres (here:
http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Verzoekpagina_voor_moderatoren/Sokpoppen/2011#Delay)
While the CheckUser confirmed that the IP from the home adres is no link to
the Delay account and there is no proof or relavancy what so ever it still
stating on Wikipedia that we are living together. After that a OTRS agent
with the name RonaldB posted a ticketnumber that can confirm that I and her
have a relationship. On the Request for Deletion page on Nl.wikipedia is
again a link posted to my private twitter to state that I have a
relationship with her. (
http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Te_verwijderen_pagina%27s/Toegevoegd_20110601)


After that this whole discussion is moved by a dutch administrator to
Commons where even Yesterday and today there is a whole discussion again
with her name involved on multible pages (
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Administrators%27_noticeboard#Request_by_Abigor;
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Administrators%27_noticeboard#Request_by_Abigor)
Where most recenty a dutch administrator Trijnstel is saying that I
and
the girl have split up (without any source and without any relevance). On my
talkpage on Commons is again brought to the attention.

Between this we also have a big Meta discussion
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Requests_for_comment/Abigor where on the
page and talkpage the relevance to a possible girlfriend is being made.

Now I'm sure that this did break my complete reputation on Wikimedia, while
I tried to defend myself and asking for information that the foundation can
and have to give I still didn't recieve anything. Also a request for removal
of all the names have been made by the ArbCom and nothing was heard But tell
me do we want to foundation the damage a reputation of people who doesn't
even edit Wikipedia but are taking on to Wikipedia to break a user? I don't
care what is happening to me, but somebody please step in and start removing
all those privacy violations on all those wiki's. This is going to damage
her, and than the Foundation will need to take the heat? Is that what we
want?

Best,

Huib
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] Welcome to new wikis

2011-07-12 Thread Huib Laurens
I have the import for Xmf wikipedia Ready, that one could be online within a
hour. :-)

2011/7/12 Milos Rancic mill...@gmail.com

 We've got four new wikis: two for content and two for chapters:
 * Mingrelian Wikipedia: http://xmf.wikipedia.org
 * Argentinian Wikiveristy: http://ar.wikiversity.org
 * Arabic chapter: http://ar.wikimedia.org/
 * Mexican chapter: http://mx.wikimedia.org/

 For the content projects import is on the way.

 ___
 foundation-l mailing list
 foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l




-- 
Kind regards,

Huib Laurens
WickedWay.nl

Webhosting the wicked way.
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] Welcome to new wikis

2011-07-12 Thread Huib Laurens
Forget my e-mail.

Stewards are not willing to grant me the needed rights to import, please
contact me if somebody wants to import it. All the files are ready here.



2011/7/12 Milos Rancic mill...@gmail.com

 On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 12:39, M. Williamson node...@gmail.com wrote:
  Rather perhaps you mean: Argentinians got chapter and Arabic got
  Wikiversity? Since the Wikiversity site seems to be in Arabic, which
 would
  be a bit odd if it was for Argentines.

 Are you sure? There are many Argentinian languages and it would be
 fair that they have at least one Wikiveristy.

 ___
 foundation-l mailing list
 foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l




-- 
Kind regards,

Huib Laurens
WickedWay.nl

Webhosting the wicked way.
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] Office Actions

2011-07-11 Thread Huib Laurens
You got mail. Could you confirm?

2011/7/11 Philippe Beaudette phili...@wikimedia.org

 Dan,

 Legal-en goes to the legal queue.  Legal@ goes to the legal department.

 pb
 ___
 Philippe Beaudette
 Head of Reader Relations
 Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.

 415-839-6885, x 2106  (reader relations)

 phili...@wikimedia.org



 On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 10:45 AM, Dan Rosenthal swatjes...@gmail.com
 wrote:

  On 7/11/11, Jon Davis w...@konsoletek.com wrote:
   Why don't you try emailing le...@wikimedia.org ?  If it is legal
  related
   they would seem to be a good start.
  
   On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 10:37, Huib Laurens sterke...@gmail.com
 wrote:
  
   Hello,
  
   Where can you request the Wikimedia Office to step in and remove a
 part
  of
   a
   article?
  
  
   I can't speak in more details, but in a series of wikipedia pages on 4
   projects there is content that could harm the wikimedia foundation in
 a
   legal way. I tried to get it done with the local admins but they
 refuse,
   what will be the next step to get a opinion for a office action?
  
  
  
   --
   Kind regards,
  
   Huib Laurens
   WickedWay.nl
  
   Webhosting the wicked way.
   ___
   foundation-l mailing list
   foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
   Unsubscribe:
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
  
  
  
  
   --
   Jon
   [[User:ShakataGaNai]] / KJ6FNQ
   http://snowulf.com/
   http://ipv6wiki.net/
   ___
   foundation-l mailing list
   foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
   Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
  
 
  Legal@ goes to OTRS legal queue (it used to be a bad email alias, I
  think that's been fixed now and it properly goes to the legal queue),
  which has no authority for handling office actions. Realistically the
  fastest way to get an office action resolved is to email Philippe, and
  if there is an immediate and urgent (and unquestionable need) for some
  sort of deletion, contact an admin/steward/oversighter as exists on
  your particular wiki.
 
 
  --
  Dan Rosenthal
 
  ___
  foundation-l mailing list
  foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
  Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
 
 ___
 foundation-l mailing list
 foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l




-- 
Kind regards,

Huib Laurens
WickedWay.nl

Webhosting the wicked way.
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] Privacy concerns

2011-07-10 Thread Huib Laurens
Hello,

Is mentioned in a offiical policy on the Dutch Wikipedia here:
http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sokpopmisbruik



2011/7/10, Benjamin Chen cnchenmi...@gmail.com:

 Gerard Meijssen, 09/07/2011 10:06:
   If you do not trust the person involved, you are crazy to send him a
 copy of
   your passport. This is a common sense. This policy as it obviously
 works..
   what is really your issue ?
  
   Do we really need a theoretical approach that only can bring us less
   functionality ? I do not think so.


 Like what David pointed out, it may be more of a problem when it is not
 clearly stated that the person receiving the letter is not a WMF staff or
 officially authorised personnel. People *may *think that they are dealing
 with official personnel but when they find out that they aren't, it may
 cause dispute. But anyway there isn't much information in this thread to
 tell.

 Best,
 [[User:Bencmq]] / Benjamin Chen
 ___
 foundation-l mailing list
 foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


-- 
Verzonden vanaf mijn mobiele apparaat

Kind regards,

Huib Laurens
WickedWay.nl

Webhosting the wicked way.

___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] Privacy concerns

2011-07-10 Thread Huib Laurens
Are you calling me a troll now?

2011/7/10 Peter Gervai grin...@gmail.com

 On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 23:10, Risker risker...@gmail.com wrote:
  I'm thinking more of whether or not it is retained, and precisely how it
 is
  retained. Is it kept in a locked box somewhere? Sitting on someone's
 desk?
  Accessible to other individuals?

 Which is clearly the good way to ask the questions. It's how the
 process works, why this way, how is it effective? How the data
 handled, secured, used and destroyed? And what are the experiences,
 how effective it was, what problems it caused (apart from trolls
 coming to and fro complaining)?

 I do not know, I ain't no dutch, and haven't been banned so far. ;-)
 I'm an outsider.

 g

 ___
 foundation-l mailing list
 foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l




-- 
Kind regards,

Huib Laurens
WickedWay.nl

Webhosting the wicked way.
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


[Foundation-l] Privacy concerns

2011-07-09 Thread Huib Laurens
Hello,

I want to know if there is a privacy concern on the Dutch Wikipedia.

The short story:

When you got blocked on the Dutch Wikipedia for socking you can remove the
block by sending a copy of your passport to a user thats trusted by the
community. After he checks your passport or all the passports involved if
you have a shared connection the block will be removed.

The user where you have to send it to isn't indentified by the foundation
and you have to send it by snailmail not to OTRS.

The foundations privacy policies does that allow this to happen?


-- 
Kind regards,
Abigor
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] BDS (hopefully) FUD?

2011-06-28 Thread Huib Laurens
When you use Wikimania and Isreal or Wiki(M/P)edia with the word
Isreal there will be 3 bots telling you not to go :-(

2011/6/28, Kim Bruning k...@bruning.xs4all.nl:

 At least 1 BDS Activist has been running around on twitter telling people
 not to go to wikimania.
   http://twitter.com/_C

 Our article on BDS:
   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boycott,_Divestment_and_Sanctions

 BDS view and action on wikimania:
   
 http://www.alternativenews.org/english/index.php/topics/economy-of-the-occupation/3439-bds-action-tell-wikimedia-not-to-hold-2011-annual-conference-in-israel-

 In particular, they state:
  On the information page for the upcoming conference, the organizers also
 say, “Haifa is also easily accessible to the Palestinian
 community, which is often left out of conferences such as Wikimania due to
 special difficulties. This community has a high rate of
 Internet usage but little first-hand acquaintance with Wikipedia and other
 Wikimedia projects.”

 The statement, however, is not true. Participation for individuals from Gaza
 and the West Bank is impossible, unless they receive
 special permits from the Israeli military to enter Israel in order to
 attend.

 To be able to actively counter this claim, can we confirm that all
 palestinian wikimedians who want to come are indeed coming?

 sincerely,
   Kim Bruning

 --
 [Non-pgp mail clients may show pgp-signature as attachment]
 gpg (www.gnupg.org) Fingerprint for key  FEF9DD72
 5ED6 E215 73EE AD84 E03A  01C5 94AC 7B0E FEF9 DD72



-- 
Verzonden vanaf mijn mobiele apparaat

Kind regards,

Huib Laurens
WickedWay.nl

Webhosting the wicked way.

___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] Invitation to connect on LinkedIn

2011-06-23 Thread Huib Laurens
*facepalm*

2011/6/24, James Heilman via LinkedIn mem...@linkedin.com:
 LinkedIn
 




 James Heilman requested to add you as a connection on LinkedIn:

 --

 Srikant,

 I'd like to add you to my professional network on LinkedIn.

 - James

 Accept invitation from James Heilman
 http://www.linkedin.com/e/-t9tct-gpanplzs-19/kEGYngBeZsro1F93qKeRGrJetgIrKFfJd2o_ToVctvnatuZm/blk/I52787614_75/pmpxnSRJrSdvj4R5fnhv9ClRsDgZp6lQs6lzoQ5AomZIpn8_djtvd34SdPwTczl9bPl1kldqgCdAbP8SdPcMdzcOcPcLrCBxbOYWrSlI/EML_comm_afe/

 View invitation from James Heilman
 http://www.linkedin.com/e/-t9tct-gpanplzs-19/kEGYngBeZsro1F93qKeRGrJetgIrKFfJd2o_ToVctvnatuZm/blk/I52787614_75/0RdRYQcjoTe3sOdkALqnpPbOYWrSlI/svi/
 --

 DID YOU KNOW you can conduct a more credible and powerful reference check
 using LinkedIn? Enter the company name and years of employment or the
 prospective employee to find their colleagues that are also in your network.
 This provides you with a more balanced set of feedback to evaluate that new
 hire.
 http://www.linkedin.com/e/-t9tct-gpanplzs-19/rsr/inv-27/


 --
 (c) 2011, LinkedIn Corporation
 ___
 foundation-l mailing list
 foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


-- 
Verzonden vanaf mijn mobiele apparaat

Kind regards,

Huib Laurens
WickedWay.nl

Webhosting the wicked way.

___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] Plethora of overlapping Categories

2011-06-21 Thread Huib Laurens
This should be on wikien-l instead of foundation-l I guess,

2011/6/21, Rui Correia correia@gmail.com:
 Hi

 I know I am in the wrong place for this. Normally this kind of thing would/
 should go on the discuss pages, but category discuss pages don't attract
 much attention.

 If you consult Categories: Sailors/ Navigators/ Explorers, you will see that
 quite a number of people are listed in these arguably (or not) overlapping
 categories for the same activity/ feat/ achievement.

 To put it into perspective, it makes sense to list a person in the
 categories of [[poet]], [[playwright]], etc, but in each of these categories
 such people would be different 'personae', with different works that make
 them merit being classified a poet or a playwright.

 On the other hand, to list - for example - Henry the Navigator/ Captain Cook
 as [[sailor]], [[navigator]], [[explorer]] looks odd as the activity
 undertaken to merit being given that title is only one. This is like calling
 a farmer a tiller/ sower/ weeder/ harvester/ etc.

 Generally, there is a problem with Categories, as many were created without
 any regard to hierarchy - we have examples of names that appear under
 British explorers or 15th century explorers, but then they are not
 listed under explorers.

 Any ideas?

 Best regards,

 Rui

 --
 _
 Mobile Number in Namibia +264 81 445 1308
 Número de Telemóvel na Namíbia +264 81 445 1308

 I am away from Johannesburg - you cannot contact me on my South African
 numbers
 Estou fora de Joanesburgo - não poderá entrar em contacto comigo através dos
 meus números sul-africanos

 Rui Correia
 Advocacy, Human Rights, Media and Language Consultant
 Angola Liaison Consultant

 ___
 ___
 foundation-l mailing list
 foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


-- 
Verzonden vanaf mijn mobiele apparaat

Kind regards,

Huib Laurens
WickedWay.nl

Webhosting the wicked way.

___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] OTRS

2011-06-07 Thread Huib Laurens
Hello,

Almost a week later there has been no responds bij the Foundation nor a
responds from the OTRS admins to this mailing nor in private.

At this moment I'm starting to believe the Foundation and the OTRS admin's
doens't care at all about this. Are we really going to accept this kind of
behavior from the people that communicate for Wikimedia to people and
companies mailing to Wikimedia?

Best,

Huib Laurens
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] OTRS

2011-06-07 Thread Huib Laurens
Yes I did. There has been no responds from them so far.

2011/6/7, Thomas Dalton thomas.dal...@gmail.com:
 On 7 June 2011 11:17, Huib Laurens sterke...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hello,

 Almost a week later there has been no responds bij the Foundation nor a
 responds from the OTRS admins to this mailing nor in private.

 At this moment I'm starting to believe the Foundation and the OTRS admin's
 doens't care at all about this. Are we really going to accept this kind of
 behavior from the people that communicate for Wikimedia to people and
 companies mailing to Wikimedia?

 Have you contacted the Ombudsman committee as I suggested? It's their
 job to handle complaints about possible breaches of the privacy
 policy. It's rare to get a satisfactory response to complaints on this
 mailing list. It's not really what it's here for.

 ___
 foundation-l mailing list
 foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


-- 
Verzonden vanaf mijn mobiele apparaat

Kind regards,

Huib Laurens
WickedWay.nl

Webhosting the wicked way.

___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] OTRS

2011-06-03 Thread Huib Laurens
Hi,

I don't get it, why isn't it a problem when we start posting OTRS tickets to
pastebin.

The article was already deleted for more that 24 so there was no need to
give the information to SilverSpoon. SilverSpoon wasn't active with the
article so there was no need to share the information with him.

The OTRS agent told SilverSpoon that I (Huib) sended the e-mail, the e-mail
is send from my business account and the OTRS agent linked a business e-mail
to my private name, we didn't give any permission to link it to my account
nor I give any permission to tell people I sended that e-mail. If I would
liked to let everybody know that I sended it I would have signed it myself.

So if I understand correctly, its no problem that a OTRS agent posts a
e-mail to PASTEBIN and give private personal information about who sended
the ticket to non-involved users. And after that discuss the ticket
including the pastebin link in a public channel. After that we got a respond
from OTRS to our ticket saying that  the file is deleted and placing there
my personal name and making a attack towards my client.

Please tell me how this is not a problem, I believe my privacy is damaged,
my client thinks her privacy is dameged because of the accusation made by
the OTRS agent that she give me a task to promote her and that we are more
that just friends.

Please explain why Wikimedia Privacy Policy accept this? And is the
foundation taking steps towards the involved OTRS agents? One thing is sure,
I work with lot of writers and we will not ever give permission to Wikimedia
to use any of our content anymore.

Best,

Huib
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


[Foundation-l] OTRS

2011-06-02 Thread Huib Laurens
Hello,


I'm wondering, is there a policy for OTRS agents saying that they can't make
info send to OTRS public?

-- 
Kind regards,

Huib Laurens
WickedWay.nl

Webhosting the wicked way.
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] OTRS

2011-06-02 Thread Huib Laurens
Okay,

Than we have a problem here,

User Silverspoon publiced a e-mail I send to OTRS in a channel.

This e-mail (http://demo.wickedway.nl/temp/SS%20temp.jpg) is a e-mail I
sended to OTRS to release content. This e-mail was paste on pastebin to
discuss in a public IRC channel (
http://demo.wickedway.nl/temp/ss%20temp2.jpg),

Silverspoon told me he had the information from user:FreakyFries. I tried to
make a complaint by Guillom, the OTRS admin and he says he doesn't give a
fuck. (http://demo.wickedway.nl/temp/ss%20temp3.jpg)

At this moment I believe my privacy has been abbused by linking me to a
website in a private channel, I would like to see what the foundation thinks
about this since the person in charge thinks its perfectly normal to publish
private e-mails.

Best,

Huib
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] OTRS

2011-06-02 Thread Huib Laurens
A screenshot SilverSpoon placed online about this:

http://img815.imageshack.us/img815/3260/10minutes.png
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] OTRS

2011-06-02 Thread Huib Laurens
I'm complaining here because the OTRS Admin doesn't give a fuck. So there is
a option to leave it and let it go, or come to here,.
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] OTRS

2011-06-02 Thread Huib Laurens
Hello,

Its a fact that this is the second time this happens, when you take it up to
the admins nothing will happen. Because I think this is not something that
should go away I take my loss and make this a public descussion. Otherwhise
nothing will happen again.

Its also a fact freakyfries a user with OTRS access says he told SilverSpoon
about it, and I guess that there is a log with everybody that read the
ticket.


-- 
Kind regards,

Huib Laurens
WickedWay.nl

Webhosting the wicked way.
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] OTRS

2011-06-02 Thread Huib Laurens
Thomas,

Who is the right person because it is a fact that a problem should be told
to the OTRS admins, after I did that he told me that it was my own problem.
So if there is somebody I should bring it up to now I would like to know.

This doesn't change the fact that I believe that SilverSpoon and the user
giving him the OTRS information damaged the privacy for both me and my
client, when we try to make all  website content aivable under a free
license we should be able to trust the Foundation and his volunteers. This
trust is broken, There was no reason what so ever that SilverSpoon needed to
know what was in the ticket.

I would like to know, will the foundation takes this serieus? Cuz this is
the second time for me, how many e-mails have been publiced also?

Best,

Huib
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] About Wikiepdia.org

2011-06-01 Thread Huib Laurens
Hi!

I kind of fail to see the Wikipedia or Wikimedia logos?

Best,

huib

2011/6/1 HW waihor...@yahoo.com.hk

 Dear all,

 Now, some user report that the website wikiepdia.org is copying the
 Wikipedia
 logo without Wikimedia Foundation permission. And, it will make user
 misunderstand it is the real Wikipedia. Same case happen in wikiedia.org ,
 and
 the website all is redirect to http://www.inforewardsurvey.com/ . Should
 the
 Wikimedia Foundation take action? See http://zhwp.org/WP:COMPLAINT

 HW
 from zh wiki
 ___
 foundation-l mailing list
 foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l




-- 
Kind regards,

Huib Laurens
WickedWay.nl

Webhosting the wicked way.
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] [Fwd: Re: Do WMF want enwp.org?]

2011-05-09 Thread Huib Laurens
But we are still going offtopic. I guess we should take the offer for
enwp.org how to go forward is later business right?

Huib

2011/5/9 Casey Brown li...@caseybrown.org

 On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 3:09 AM, Keegan Peterzell keegan.w...@gmail.com
 wrote:
  On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 1:58 AM, John Vandenberg jay...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 
  http://commons.org/ would be nice.  have we tried approaching them?
 
  --
  John Vandenberg
 
  Who, exactly, is in charge of domain registration at the WMF?
 

 I believe it's Rob Halsell.  I forwarded Thomas's original e-mail to
 him yesterday to see if he could do anything to help; we'll see what
 he says. :-)

 --
 Casey Brown
 Cbrown1023

 ___
 foundation-l mailing list
 foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l




-- 
Kind regards,

Huib Laurens
WickedWay.nl

Webhosting the wicked way.
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


[Foundation-l] Peering

2011-03-14 Thread Huib Laurens
Hello,

The foundationsite says in the article peering that the foundation is
looking for free rack-space / routers.

What kind of facilities do they want? Is there a more detailed pages
with the wishes en needs for the foundation, or can that be geven here
on the list?

Best,

Huib

-- 
Verzonden vanaf mijn mobiele apparaat

Regards,
Huib Abigor Laurens



Support Free Knowledge: http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Donate

___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] [Announce] Brion Vibber to rejoin Wikimedia Foundation

2011-03-08 Thread Huib Laurens
Lo sentimos, pero el Inglés es el idioma principal en esta lista.
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] Steward election issues

2011-03-08 Thread Huib Laurens
Lo sentimos, pero el Inglés es el idioma principal en esta lista.
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] multilingual mailing list

2011-03-08 Thread Huib Laurens
2011/3/8 Casey Brown li...@caseybrown.org

 \
 What Thomas says may seem like a joke, but it's actually something
 that's happened on this list in the past. :-)  I remember a thread
 where I was talking with someone in English while they responded in
 German.  We used Google Translate to figure out what each other was
 saying and then we responded in our own language.


I remember a French case also :-)

-- 
Regards,
Huib Abigor Laurens



Support Free Knowledge: http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Donate
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] Remarks on Wikimedia's fundraiser

2011-03-05 Thread Huib Laurens
I still think it was a bad thing that the fundraiser crew decided to use
Sue Gardner director of Wikipedia in the banners because it raised more
money... A very bad thing because everybody knows here that she isn't the
director for Wikipedia.
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] Licenses' biodiversity : my big disagreement with the Wikimedia usability initiative's software specifications

2011-02-18 Thread Huib Laurens
I'm starting to think you just don't like changes... every change that is
done will result in a email from you
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] VPAT

2011-02-16 Thread Huib Laurens
Section 508, an amendment to the United States Workforce Rehabilitation Act
of 1973, is a federal law mandating that all electronic and information
technology developed, procured, maintained, or used by the federal
government be accessible to people with disabilities. Technology is deemed
to be accessible if it can be used as effectively by people with
disabilities as by those without. To demonstate that a product or Web
service is in compliance with Section 508, the creator completes a Voluntary
Product Accessibility Template (VPAT), an informational tool that
describes exactly how the product or service does or does not meet Section
508 standards. The completed VPAT gets posted on the creator's Web site to
provide government officials and consumers with access to the information.

The scope of Section 508 is limited to the federal sector. It includes
binding, enforceable standards, as well as compliance reporting requirements
and a complaint procedure. Section 508 doesn't apply to the private sector,
nor does it impose requirements on the recipients of federal funding.
Because the federal government has so much purchasing power, however, it is
hoped that Section 508 will encourage the developement of products and
Web-based services that meet accessibility standards. To that end, the
United Stated Department of Education now requires states funded by the
Assistive Technology Act State Grant program (a grant program that supports
consumer-driven state projects to improve access to assistive
technologyhttp://whatis.techtarget.com/definition/0,289893,sid9_gci914775,00.htmldevices
and services) to comply with Section 508.
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] Since Egypt has shutdown internet, should we too?

2011-01-28 Thread Huib Laurens
Hello,

When we close our site in support.. Than we don't support free information
for everyone.. Than we close the information down...

Best,

Huib

2011/1/28 Ashar Voultoiz hashar+...@free.fr hashar%2b...@free.fr

 Hello,

 Tonight, Egypt has ordered all operators to shut down their BGP
 adjacencies with out of countries providers.  This mean Egypt is
 disconnected from the rest of the internet.

 I am wondering, should we just close our site in support? That would
 surely have a huge impact and show how much we care about free
 information for everyone.


 --
 Ashar Voultoiz


 ___
 foundation-l mailing list
 foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l




-- 
Regards,
Huib Abigor Laurens



Support Free Knowledge: http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Donate
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] Request for assistance

2011-01-05 Thread Huib Laurens
Thnks for posting that Peter is running for admin... Will support right
away.

Huib

2011/1/5 M. Williamson node...@gmail.com

 Virgilio:

 Many thanks for the information. I have, after reviewing the evidence
 you presented, casted my vote in support of Peter Symonds' adminship
 on Meta.

 Muito obrigado pela informação. Depois de avaliar a evidência
 apresentada, votei a favor da proposta da concessão de poderes
 administrativos a Peter Symonds em Meta.

 -m.

 2011/1/5 Virgilio A. P. Machado v...@fct.unl.pt:
  To all women and men of good faith who are members of this mailing list,
  please check the following pages:
 
  1)
 http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Meta:Requests_for_adminship/PeterSymonds
 
  2)
 
 http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Meta_talk:Requests_for_adminship/PeterSymonds
 
  3)
 
 http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Meta:Requests_for_help_from_a_sysop_or_bureaucrat#Vapmachado_.28talk_.E2.80.A2_contribs.29_-_ban_request
 
  4) http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Vapmachado#Block
 
  5)
 
 http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Logpage=User%3AVapmachadotype=block
 
  6) http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Vapmachado
 
  and any further information on the user page:
 
  7) http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Vapmachado
 
  Please let me know:
 
  a) why my request for unblock was never answered,
 
  b) where on page (2) are the occurrences of harassment,
 
  c) if after Dec. 23, he's just returned to do the same thing that lead
  him to be blocked in the first instance.,
 
  d) where are the occurrences of continued hostile behavior,
 
  e) towards what or whom is that continued hostile behavior,
 
  f) why my interesting history of cross-wiki pioneering achievements
 is
  never mentioned, a clear violation of a NPOV in decision making.
 
  The accusations of meatpuppetry and privacy violations based on highly
  controverted and irregular cases, may still turn out to be defamatory,
 and
  it is not very wise to use them to attack the reputation, honor and good
  name of this user.
 
  Sincerely,
 
  Virgilio A. P. Machado
 
 
  ___
  foundation-l mailing list
  foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
  Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
 

 ___
 foundation-l mailing list
 foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l




-- 
Regards,
Huib Abigor Laurens



Support Free Knowledge: http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Donate
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] Fundraising banners

2011-01-01 Thread Huib Laurens
To bad this fundraiser used lies, and other things the community didn't want...


Sue exicutive director wikipedia as example

2011/1/1, Keegan Peterzell kpeterz...@wikimedia.org:
 +1 with a :) and a cherry on top.

 On 12/31/2010 8:34 PM, Philippe Beaudette wrote:
 Hi everyone,

 We wanted you to hear first: in about three hours, we're switching the
 messaging on the banners to Thank you!  It's time to thank the world,
 because the world came together to help support the Wikimedia projects.
 We're delighted to report that nearly half a million donations came in.
 It's a resounding vote of confidence in what you've done with the
 projects.  So take a moment to stop, to celebrate, and to enjoy the
 accomplishment... and then it's time to focus on the tenth anniversary
 year!

 You may notice that the fundraising statistics page doesn't quite say
 $16M.  Since you might be asked about that, here's the math we used to
 arrive at the end of the fundraiser:

 In addition to the amount posted on the graph (roughly $13.5M), we have
 about $1.5 million in revenue received during testing or received but not
 yet posted (manual check entry, etc).  We've been counting on $500,000
 from the chapters in our thermometer formula but given the extraordinary
 chapter fundraising success this year, we're confident that we'll be over
 the $16M mark.  (We're also including an adjusted value for the recurring
 gifts that we've received this year.)

 We're delighted to be able to start 2011 with our community giving goal
 already met.  We did this in a collaborative fashion: testing nearly 200
 banner ideas submitted by the community, using translations, with
 community involvement in the testing, and in the next phase of the
 campaign - encouraging people to edit.

 We'll be running Thank you banners for the next few days to tell the
 world how much this editing community appreciates their financial support,
 and then will convert to banners inviting people to get involved in tenth
 anniversary celebrations around the world, and to make their first edit
 (the contribution phase of the campaign).

 Now let's go celebrate!

 Zack Exley
 Philippe Beaudette
 Megan Hernandez

 ___
 Philippe Beaudette
 Head of Reader Relations
 Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.

 pbeaude...@wikimedia.org

 Imagine a world in which every human being can freely share
 in the sum of all knowledge.  Help us make it a reality!

 http://donate.wikimedia.org

 ___
 foundation-l mailing list
 foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


 --
 Keegan Peterzell
 Associate Community Officer, Fundraising 2010
 Wikimedia Foundation
 kpeterz...@wikimedia.org

 Imagine a world in which every human being can freely share in
 the sum of all knowledge.  Help us make it a reality!

 http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Donate



 ___
 foundation-l mailing list
 foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


-- 
Verzonden vanaf mijn mobiele apparaat

Regards,
Huib Abigor Laurens



Support Free Knowledge: http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Donate

___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] Fw: About WM private policy

2010-12-24 Thread Huib Laurens
Thats the discission for the community not the foundation.



2010/12/24 HW waihor...@yahoo.com.hk

 *re-sent due some problem on foundation-l*

 A recent discussion on zh Wikipedia is talking about the WMF private policy
 which is on http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Privacy_policy . Some IP
 user
 says that in the sentence The Foundation does not require editors to
 register
 with a project. Anyone can edit without logging in with a username, in
 which
 case they will be identified by network IP address. , createpage is a
 edit, so
 the wiki should not disable IP's createpage and allowed only user to
 createpage.


 The question is: IS CREATEPAGE MUST NOT BE DISABLE TO IP USER?

 Please WMF staff answer this question and it is related to a recent
 discussion
 on
 http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:%E4%BA%92%E5%8A%A9%E5%AE%A2%E6%A0%88/%E6%96%B9%E9%92%88#.E6.8F.90.E8.AB.8B.E7.84.A1.E6.A2.9D.E4.BB.B6.E5.BB.A2.E9.99.A4.E6.9C.89.E9.97.9C.E9.96.8B.E6.94.BEIP.E5.89.B5.E5.BB.BA.E6.A2.9D.E7.9B.AE.E6.AC.8A.E9.99.90.E7.9A.84.E6.8A.95.E7.A5.A8


 Thanks.
 HW - user of zhwiki.



 ___
 foundation-l mailing list
 foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l




-- 
Regards,
Huib Abigor Laurens



Support Free Knowledge: http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Donate
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] How to contact the foundation's legal department?

2010-12-18 Thread Huib Laurens
Hi,

I would say when you aren't sure or you think you are sure but don't have a
source just don't answer?

Best,

Huib
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] How to contact the foundation's legal department?

2010-12-18 Thread Huib Laurens
Why are you saying the staff answer is wrong? If staff says use
le...@wikimedia.org why are you changing it?

Best,

Huib

2010/12/18 Dan Rosenthal swatjes...@gmail.com

 Correction. I've just seen Jon's email about having fixed le...@.

 However, it is still preferable to send legal email to
 legal...@wikimedia.org for a faster resolution and for ease on our end.
 Nobody has made the OTRS team (especially the legal team) aware of any
 policy changes on that end, so if something major has changed without
 telling us, someone's got some explaining to do.

 -Dan


 On Dec 18, 2010, at 5:13 AM, Federico Leva (Nemo) wrote:

  Dan Rosenthal, 17/12/2010 01:01:
  If you have a legal question, best to send it to legal...@wikimedia.org.
 It will be routed much faster and is much preferable.
 
  Please stop it: this is incorrect and perhaps you should at least double
  check if someone says it's incorrect, especially after a WMF staffer
  like Jon has confirmed so.
  «00:18 +sgardner If anyone (editors, chapters people, etc.) have legal
  questions or problems, Steven's correct -- legal_AT_wikimedia.org is
  where to send them»
  (http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/IRC_office_hours/Office_hours_2010-10-27).
  I hope this is enough.
 
  Nemo
 
  ___
  foundation-l mailing list
  foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
  Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


 ___
 foundation-l mailing list
 foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l




-- 
Regards,
Huib Abigor Laurens



Support Free Knowledge: http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Donate
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] How to contact the foundation's legal department?

2010-12-16 Thread Huib Laurens
Hello,

As far as I know: le...@wikimedia.org

Best,

Huib
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


[Foundation-l] Fundraising more important than the Truth?

2010-12-09 Thread Huib Laurens
Hello,

I don't like to send emails like this but I don't see a solution other than
this.

I understand that we need money to keep the Wikimedia Foundation running,
and yes I support the fundraiser and I donated money. But do we want money
because we told people other things than the truth I find it kind of strange
and very disturbing that there are things that currently being used to get
money from visitors while those things are simply wrong.

First we have the donating landing page and it say's

Together, we can keep it free of charge and free of advertising. We can keep
it open – you can use the information in Wikipedia any way you want. We can
keep it growing – spreading knowledge everywhere, and inviting participation
from everyone...

*free of charge*

The content on Wikipedia is written under a free license that means
everybody can use in all ways saying that Wikipedia will be a payed source
of information will just be wrong because all the content is on mirrors and
even if it goes bad it will always be free for everybody somewhere.


Secondly:

There is a banner saying Sue is the Director of Wikipedia and there is a
discussion about that where somebody of the fundraising team say's that they
are testing what gives more money... Telling people Sue the director of
Wikipedia or Sue the Director for the Wikimedia Foundation...


But the Fundraising team knows that they are wrong because the Sue's letter
says: *Wikipedia will always be free* (
http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Template:2010/SueLetterA/en)


But let us ask the quistion: Do we want to make this our best fundraiser
knowing we didn't tell the truth about things or do we think we can be open
and clear about roles, functions and facts?  I hope we choose the last
option.

-- 
Regards,
Huib Abigor Laurens



Support Free Knowledge: http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Donate
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


[Foundation-l] Fwd: Fundraising more important than the Truth?

2010-12-09 Thread Huib Laurens
Hello,

I don't like to send emails like this but I don't see a solution other than
this.

I understand that we need money to keep the Wikimedia Foundation running,
and yes I support the fundraiser and I donated money. But do we want money
because we told people other things than the truth I find it kind of strange
and very disturbing that there are things that currently being used to get
money from visitors while those things are simply wrong.

First we have the donating landing page and it say's

Together, we can keep it free of charge and free of advertising. We can keep
it open – you can use the information in Wikipedia any way you want. We can
keep it growing – spreading knowledge everywhere, and inviting participation
from everyone...

*free of charge*

The content on Wikipedia is written under a free license that means
everybody can use in all ways saying that Wikipedia will be a payed source
of information will just be wrong because all the content is on mirrors and
even if it goes bad it will always be free for everybody somewhere.


Secondly:

There is a banner saying Sue is the Director of Wikipedia and there is a
discussion about that where somebody of the fundraising team say's that they
are testing what gives more money... Telling people Sue the director of
Wikipedia or Sue the Director for the Wikimedia Foundation...


But the Fundraising team knows that they are wrong because the Sue's letter
says: *Wikipedia will always be free* (
http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Template:2010/SueLetterA/en)


But let us ask the quistion: Do we want to make this our best fundraiser
knowing we didn't tell the truth about things or do we think we can be open
and clear about roles, functions and facts?  I hope we choose the last
option.

-- 
Regards,
Huib Abigor Laurens



Support Free Knowledge: http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Donate
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] Wikipedia Executive Director?

2010-12-09 Thread Huib Laurens
Am I placed on moderation? all my previous emails seem to fail?


2010/12/9 Austin Hair adh...@gmail.com

 2010/12/9 KIZU Naoko aph...@gmail.com:
  I don't support this word choice: on twitter.com Japanese speaking
  reader mistook it as one of English Wikipedia admins someone who
  writes articles etc.
 
  Not only smaller projects but also on the Wikipedia, this factual
  error is better to correct I think. I heard it placed only on enwiki
  (in a downtime I haven't confirmed yet), but English is no mother
  tongue of every reader of the English Wikipedia. Factual error and
  language barriers may spread false information.

 Not to mention cultural barriers.  In Wikipedia communities with (to
 me, uncomfortably) structured hierarchies―Senior Editor, Editor
 Second Class, Senior Chief Petty Editor―this is bound to confuse
 the heck out of people.  As mentioned elsewhere in this thread, we
 have enough problems trying to differentiate between Wikileaks and
 Wikimedia; having to revisit Wikimedia vs. Wikipedia is understandably
 frustrating to those of us who've spent years explaining the
 difference.

 It's easy to point fingers at an almost exclusively North American
 staff and cry cultural ignorance, but I'm not―I know that plenty of
 people on staff have years of experience working across cultures, even
 if it's talking to foreigners on IRC.

 I wonder, though, who on staff can name the editor ranks on zhwiki?

 Austin

  On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 10:55 AM, John Vandenberg jay...@gmail.com
 wrote:
  On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 12:47 PM, Philippe Beaudette
  pbeaude...@wikimedia.org wrote:
  FWIW
 
  The word Wikipedia wasn't supposed to make it to sister sites, and
 that's being fixed right now, so pardon my quick note... I'll write a bit
 more later about the term as being used on Wikipedia, but the error in
 pushing it out to sister sites is being corrected right now, so I wanted to
 acknowledge that...
 
  Wikipedia does not have an Executive Director, or anything of the
  sort.  That title suggests that Sue has the final say over content.  I
  don't think it should be used anywhere.
 
  But, thanks for at least removing it from the 'smaller' projects.
 
  --
  John Vandenberg
 
  ___
  foundation-l mailing list
  foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
  Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
 
 
 
 
  --
  KIZU Naoko / 木津尚子
  member of Wikimedians in Kansai  / 関西ウィキメディアユーザ会
 http://kansai.wikimedia.jp
  ___
  foundation-l mailing list
  foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
  Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
 

 ___
 foundation-l mailing list
 foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l




-- 
Regards,
Huib Abigor Laurens



Support Free Knowledge: http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Donate
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] Wikipedia Executive Director?

2010-12-09 Thread Huib Laurens
I switched the option on to get notification when my emails get to the
list... But that seems to stopped working today?


2010/12/9 Noein prono...@gmail.com

 You don't receive your own mails. We got two copies of your previous
 mail. You can check on the pipermail. [1]


 [1]: http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/

 On 09/12/2010 19:39, Huib Laurens wrote:
  Am I placed on moderation? all my previous emails seem to fail?
 
 
  2010/12/9 Austin Hair adh...@gmail.com
 
  2010/12/9 KIZU Naoko aph...@gmail.com:
  I don't support this word choice: on twitter.com Japanese speaking
  reader mistook it as one of English Wikipedia admins someone who
  writes articles etc.
 
  Not only smaller projects but also on the Wikipedia, this factual
  error is better to correct I think. I heard it placed only on enwiki
  (in a downtime I haven't confirmed yet), but English is no mother
  tongue of every reader of the English Wikipedia. Factual error and
  language barriers may spread false information.
 
  Not to mention cultural barriers.  In Wikipedia communities with (to
  me, uncomfortably) structured hierarchies―Senior Editor, Editor
  Second Class, Senior Chief Petty Editor―this is bound to confuse
  the heck out of people.  As mentioned elsewhere in this thread, we
  have enough problems trying to differentiate between Wikileaks and
  Wikimedia; having to revisit Wikimedia vs. Wikipedia is understandably
  frustrating to those of us who've spent years explaining the
  difference.
 
  It's easy to point fingers at an almost exclusively North American
  staff and cry cultural ignorance, but I'm not―I know that plenty of
  people on staff have years of experience working across cultures, even
  if it's talking to foreigners on IRC.
 
  I wonder, though, who on staff can name the editor ranks on zhwiki?
 
  Austin
 
  On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 10:55 AM, John Vandenberg jay...@gmail.com
  wrote:
  On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 12:47 PM, Philippe Beaudette
  pbeaude...@wikimedia.org wrote:
  FWIW
 
  The word Wikipedia wasn't supposed to make it to sister sites, and
  that's being fixed right now, so pardon my quick note... I'll write a
 bit
  more later about the term as being used on Wikipedia, but the error in
  pushing it out to sister sites is being corrected right now, so I wanted
 to
  acknowledge that...
 
  Wikipedia does not have an Executive Director, or anything of the
  sort.  That title suggests that Sue has the final say over content.  I
  don't think it should be used anywhere.
 
  But, thanks for at least removing it from the 'smaller' projects.
 
  --
  John Vandenberg
 
  ___
  foundation-l mailing list
  foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
  Unsubscribe:
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
 
 
 
 
  --
  KIZU Naoko / 木津尚子
  member of Wikimedians in Kansai  / 関西ウィキメディアユーザ会
  http://kansai.wikimedia.jp
  ___
  foundation-l mailing list
  foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
  Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
 
 
  ___
  foundation-l mailing list
  foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
  Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
 
 
 
 


 ___
 foundation-l mailing list
 foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l




-- 
Regards,
Huib Abigor Laurens



Support Free Knowledge: http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Donate
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] Pieter Kuiper

2010-12-07 Thread Huib Laurens
Hello,

Strange that Pieter kan rule Wikimedia Commons... So far that the Foundation
need to step in.

Btw, there is even a request to get him blocked on OTRS...

People need to take action on Commons and don't point fingers because
nothing will happen than.


Huib

2010/12/7 FT2 ft2.w...@gmail.com

 On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 5:48 PM, Virgilio A. P. Machado v...@fct.unl.pt
 wrote:

  The only Wikipedian that has been dealt with by an arbcom by his real
  name, NOT his user name!
 

 This tag line is extremely inaccurate, for what it's worth.

 FT2.
 ___
 foundation-l mailing list
 foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l




-- 
Regards,
Huib Abigor Laurens



Support Free Knowledge: http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Donate
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] Fwd: Re: [VereinDE-l] Bericht zur Verleihung der Zedler-Me...

2010-12-06 Thread Huib Laurens
Dutch Wikipedia has multible members that aren't admins

2010/12/6, John Vandenberg jay...@gmail.com:
 On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 12:42 AM, Huib Laurens sterke...@gmail.com wrote:
 Sinds its not only English Wikipedia but foundation wide I can say we have
 people becomming Arbcom without being a Admin.. We had CheckUsers without
 being a admin. So its not a ladder.

 Hi Huib,

 Which project has had ArbCom members that were not admins?

 There is a related discussion started on meta.

 http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Arbitration_Committee#Access_to_WMF_private_information


 --
 John V

 ___
 foundation-l mailing list
 foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


-- 
Verzonden vanaf mijn mobiele apparaat

Regards,
Huib Abigor Laurens



Support Free Knowledge: http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Donate

___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] Fwd: Re: [VereinDE-l] Bericht zur Verleihung der Zedler-Me...

2010-12-05 Thread Huib Laurens
Sinds its not only English Wikipedia but foundation wide I can say we have
people becomming Arbcom without being a Admin.. We had CheckUsers without
being a admin. So its not a ladder.

Huib

2010/12/4 wjhon...@aol.com

 In a message dated 12/4/2010 6:50:38 AM Pacific Standard Time,
 geni...@gmail.com writes:


  Actually we have at least 3.
 
  Editor, admin bureaucrat, steward, dev.
 
  everyone, arbcom
 
  Everyone, foundation, foundation board.
 

 Not three Geni, one.
 Has anyone become Arbcom without being an admin?
 Has anyone become Bureaucrat without being an admin?
 Has anyone become Foundation Board without being an admin?

 It's all one ladder.
 Sure it's *possible* for a non-admin to be elected to Arbcom, but when it's
 never happened, the truth should be apparent.

 W
 ___
 foundation-l mailing list
 foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l




-- 
Regards,
Huib Abigor Laurens



Support Free Knowledge: http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Donate
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] foundation-l Digest, Vol 81, Issue 3

2010-12-03 Thread Huib Laurens
I mailed to all moderators but I guess none of them are online in this
timezone?



2010/12/3 Корецкий Богдан krot11...@mail.ru

 How interesting!
 Maybe I can help?
 If I can, please answer me about that.

 ___
 foundation-l mailing list
 foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l




-- 
Regards,
Huib Abigor Laurens



Support Free Knowledge: http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Donate
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] should not web server logs (of requests) be published?

2010-11-28 Thread Huib Laurens
Its againt the privacy poliicy to publish logs like that, and there is
really no good reason given why people should see al the ip
information for all visitors on a wiki

2010/11/28, dinar qorbanof qdi...@gmail.com:
 hello
 should not web server logs (of requests) be published?

 my native language is tatar and i would or i am going to write to
 tatar wikipedia and say other people to write to it.
 authors/managers/administrators of tatar texts are tatar people. for
 that i think it is correct if tatar people can see web server logs. i
 think this would not be bad for privacy of readers, because they would
 see that logs are published, and can access wikipedia through proxy to
 hide their ip address. ip-addresses of anonymous writers are already
 published. if anonymouse readers want to hide their referer or search
 keywords, they also can hide that by copy-pasting wikipedia article
 url, and this also should be said shortly on every page and in privacy
 page.
 another advantage of this is that people could create custom analysers
 of the logs.

 i think logs should be divided with directory structure by years,
 months, days, and probably hours.

 ___
 foundation-l mailing list
 foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


-- 
Verzonden vanaf mijn mobiele apparaat

Regards,
Huib Abigor Laurens



Support Free Knowledge: http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Donate

___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] should not web server logs (of requests) be published?

2010-11-28 Thread Huib Laurens
Do you have a source that many people use dymamic ip's? Cuz I'm pretty sure
most of the regular visiters use one ip.

2010/11/28 dinar qorbanof qdi...@gmail.com

 i do not think that ip address is so important private information,
 many people browse through dynamic ip and NAT.

 ___
 foundation-l mailing list
 foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l




-- 
Regards,
Huib Abigor Laurens



Support Free Knowledge: http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Donate
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] Call for a moratorium on all new software developments

2010-09-09 Thread Huib Laurens
2010/9/9 Teofilo teofilow...@gmail.com

 2010/9/7, Teofilo teofilow...@gmail.com:
  2010/9/7, Tim Starling tstarl...@wikimedia.org:
 
  Presumably this conspiracy would have to extend beyond the WMF to
  PediaPress and Purodha Blissenbach, the developers of Collection and
  mobile.wikipedia.org respectively.
 
  The absence of a history tab in the mobile format is in my view an
  exact measurement of the temperature of the warmth of the relations
  between the WMF and its contributors.
 
  Let's not call this a conspiracy. Philosopher Pierre Bourdieu  would
  call it an unconcious strategy (1).

 The other reason why we can't call this a conspiracy is that a
 conspiracy is usually kept secret, while that agenda is known by a lot
 of people. They even managed to organise a vote and found a majority
 approving it at

 http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Licensing_update/Result

 The result is the adding of You agree that a hyperlink or URL is
 sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license on every
 edit tab footer.

 The result is that it is thought that it is OK to distribute contents
 without the history tab, the author's names remaining in a format not
 readable on the device the user is using. So all these things are
 features of the new vastly known agenda. They are not bugs.

 ___
 foundation-l mailing list
 foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l



There was nothing secret about that vote, we announced it on all wiki's and
we kept public archives for our mailinglist.

-- 
Regards,
Huib Abigor Laurens



Support Free Knowledge: http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Donate
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] You have been unsubscribed from the WikimediaAnnounce-l mailing list

2010-09-03 Thread Huib Laurens
O.o



-- 
Regards,
Huib Abigor Laurens



Support Free Knowledge: http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Donate
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] ru-Wikiversuty

2010-08-21 Thread Huib Laurens
saying you suspend all your work untill this is resolved will not help, this
is a community matter not a foundation matter.


-- 
Regards,
Huib Abigor Laurens



Support Free Knowledge: http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Donate
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


[Foundation-l] Fwd: [Wikitech-l] relocating search servers

2010-08-12 Thread Huib Laurens
forwarding because this hits more people than just wikitech-l

-- Forwarded message --
From: Robert Stojnic rainma...@gmail.com
Date: 2010/8/12
Subject: [Wikitech-l] relocating search servers
To: Wikimedia developers wikitec...@lists.wikimedia.org



Hi all,

We are currently relocating some servers internally in the datacenter.
As a consequence, search snippets, did you mean... and interwiki
search are going to be turned off during this time, and only bare
results shown. This will affect all WMF wikis. I expect, if everything
goes well, that in around 4-5h things are going to go back to normal.

Cheers, Robert


___
Wikitech-l mailing list
wikitec...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l



-- 
Huib Abigor Laurens



Support Free Knowledge: http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Donate
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] Announcing my departure from the Wikimedia Foundation

2010-08-03 Thread Huib Laurens
Cary,

I don't know what to say, I will miss you :(
-- 
Huib Abigor Laurens

Tech team

www.wikiweet.nl - www.llamadawiki.nl - www.forgotten-beauty.com -
www.wickedway.nl - www.huiblaurens.nl - www.wikiweet.org
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] [TODAY] Office Hour for Thursday, July 22, featuring Sue Gardner

2010-07-20 Thread Huib Laurens
Hi,

The [TODAY] in the topic is kind of wrong I guess, you made me wonder
if I was wrong about the date today :P


-- 
Huib Abigor Laurens

Tech team

www.wikiweet.nl - www.llamadawiki.nl - www.forgotten-beauty.com -
www.wickedway.nl - www.huiblaurens.nl - www.wikiweet.org

___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] [Wiktionary-l] Adopting OmegaWiki as Wikimedia project

2010-07-19 Thread Huib Laurens
Hello,

I fail to see how this project could be usefull for the Wiktionary projects,
because it will probably bring double stuff, we have some big projects there
in some languages, why should be bring on a new project that would be
multilingual? It sounds that we only have double work.

And Wikimedia stands for open content that everybody can change, will
OmegaWiki use all wikimedia rules when it would be a project?




-- 
Huib Abigor Laurens

Tech team

www.wikiweet.nl - www.llamadawiki.nl - www.forgotten-beauty.com -
www.wickedway.nl - www.huiblaurens.nl - www.wikiweet.org
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] Wikimedia Serbia billboard campaign

2010-06-27 Thread Huib Laurens
Hi,

The billboards look pretty cool!

-- 
Huib Abigor Laurens

Tech team

www.wikiweet.nl - www.llamadawiki.nl - www.forgotten-beauty.com -
www.huiblaurens.nl - www.wikiweet.org
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] Office Hour for Friday, June 11, featuring Mike Godwin

2010-06-10 Thread Huib Laurens
Hi,

It would be great to have one from the technical staff also...

Best,


-- 
Huib Abigor Laurens

Tech team
www.wikiweet.nl - www.llamadawiki.nl - www.forgotten-beauty.com -
www.huiblaurens.nl - www.wikiweet.org
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] Archivage down?

2010-06-05 Thread Huib Laurens
6 message on the mailinglist, could we make a announcement or something?



-- 
Huib Abigor Laurens

Tech team
www.wikiweet.nl - www.llamadawiki.nl - www.forgotten-beauty.com -
www.huiblaurens.nl - www.wikiweet.org
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] Where things stand now

2010-05-08 Thread Huib Laurens
Dear mr Wales,

I don't understand you, I really don't

You are saying you want to clean up Commons from hardcore porn but you are
deleting art work or pictures that doesn't even show boobs.

Did you just nuke or did you look at what you did?




-- 
Huib Abigor Laurens

Tech team
www.wikiweet.nl - www.llamadawiki.nl - www.forgotten-beauty.com
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] Wikimedia Announcement list is active

2010-04-20 Thread Huib!
Hello,


The creation of this list sound very good, but when I read the rules on 
Meta I think the list is going to be spammed with non or less important 
information.

Participation announcements for Wiki meet-up

I'm sure there is a Wiki meet-up every weekend around the globe, posting 
this information to this list will probably spam. People interested in 
joining wiki meet-ups would find it in a local site and this list would 
probably reach to much people. Or there should be more information like 
Wiki meet-ups bigger than X people or something like that.


Publication of new issues of Wikipedia signpost, Wikizine, and other

The same here, when people would subscribe to this list they want to 
read about the announcements from the Foundation and there chapters, The 
Wikipedia Signpost is a weekly post and I guess people wouldn't want to 
subscribe to a announcement list en recieve multiple emails a week.

I would rather see to keep this list only for big events, announcement 
from staff, chapters and board and keep the other smaller things off 
this list.


Best regards,

Huib


___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] Office Hour for Thursday, February 25

2010-02-25 Thread Huib!
Hi,

It could also be a idea to ask Danese Cooper to come by on IRC for a 
hour. But I would like it when Tim Starling would come by also... Yes he 
is always on IRC but almost always busy :)

See ya.

-- 
Huib Laurens


Http://www.wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/user:Abigor



___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] Office Hour for Thursday, February 25

2010-02-25 Thread Huib!
Thomas Dalton schreef:
 On 25 February 2010 10:02, Huib! abi...@forgotten-beauty.com wrote:
   
 Hi,

 It could also be a idea to ask Danese Cooper to come by on IRC for a
 hour. But I would like it when Tim Starling would come by also... Yes he
 is always on IRC but almost always busy :)
 

 Give Danese a chance to settle in first! She hasn't had a chance to
 learn the answers yet.

 ___
 foundation-l mailing list
 foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
 


 Geen virus gevonden in het binnenkomende-bericht.
 Gecontroleerd door AVG - www.avg.com 
 Versie: 9.0.733 / Virusdatabase: 271.1.1/2709 - datum van uitgifte: 02/25/10 
 08:34:00

   
Meeting the community is also a way to settle in.

-- 
Huib Laurens


Http://www.wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/user:Abigor



___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] sell wikipedia

2010-01-21 Thread Huib Laurens
Hello,

Why would anybody want to buy it if it is possible to download it for free?

Make a page on the wmf site where people can buy a hd with wikimedia
content and donated it to a school or something like that sounds more
like a nice idea.

Best regards,

Huib

2010/1/21, ster...@aol.com ster...@aol.com:

 store it on memory chip or HD and sell it
 ___
 foundation-l mailing list
 foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l



-- 

The soldiers graves are great preachers of peace

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Abigor

___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] Foundation-l open for business, with changes

2009-11-14 Thread Huib!
Hi,

I think its a good idea and maybe it will bring some new people active 
on this list. Since we have a lot of people reading and only a little 
group posting.

See ya,
-- 

Huib Laurens

http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/User:Abigor


___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] Recent firing?

2009-10-30 Thread Huib!
Hello,

I normally only read this list because I don't see the need to get 
really involved into discussion a lot, but while reading this I had the 
feeling that I should respond.

As far as I see it there was been a question and it has been answered 
with the answer that Erik isn't going to respond on rumours and will 
make a announcement when needed, so why does pushing for a answer?

Wouldn't it be better to sit back and wait of and when there will be a 
announcement? Its just like Wikipedia we can't think trust something 
untill its verified and pushing isn't going to help :)

Best regards,
Huib

-- 
*Huib Laurens*

Web: Forgotten-beauty.com http://www.forgotten-beauty.com.com/
Email: abi...@forgotten-beauty.com mailto:abi...@forgotten-beauty.com
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] moderate this list

2009-08-28 Thread Huib!
Hello,

Some people are more active than other people on this list, but I don't
see a problem with the both names you mention.

Cheers,

Huib
-- 

Http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/user:Abigor



___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


[Foundation-l] Closure of projects

2009-08-20 Thread Huib!
Hello,

I noticed that there are still a lot of open request for closure on Meta 
so I decided to contact a LangCom member (Robin) asking him about how 
and when the projects will be closed or when the requests will be 
closed, but I recieved a answer I didn't expected.

Robin told me there was no policy ( 
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Closure_of_WMF_projects ) about the 
closure of projects so the request can stay open for always.


I think its kind of strange that we people can make a request, that 
there are people who are voting and spending there time commenting on 
the request or even worse have stress because there project could be 
closed but the request will never be closed.


Is there a way to change this with a new policy, or with a different com 
for the closure, because this seems to me a waste of time for a lot of 
people, people can stop editting projects just because the think the 
project will be closed.

At this moment there are 27 request for projects to be closed, ( 
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Proposals_for_closing_projects ) I think 
50% is a easy closure for keep or close. The oldest project is from 2007 
that would mean its still open after 2 years :/

-- 
*Huib Laurens*

Web: Forgotten-beauty.com http://www.forgotten-beauty.com.com/
Email: abi...@forgotten-beauty.com mailto:abi...@forgotten-beauty.com
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] Board election spamming

2009-08-08 Thread Huib!
Hello,

Aren't we working to wrong way, I think it should be better to let 
people opt-in, because we didn't release our e-mail addresses for this 
kind of spam. I use different emails for private / mailinglist use and I 
didn't give permission to use my private email.

Its kind of stupid that this email isn't send out when the election 
started, but is send when a lot of people already voted, and its 
unneeded now so its spam.

But its very good to know that my three bots can vote to, if the 
election commitee sends me a email that the bots can vote, I'm sure they 
are really allowed right? :P


Best regards,

Huib Laurens

___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] Board election spamming

2009-08-08 Thread Huib!
Hello,

As far as I know the email users function doesn't show the emailadres to 
people so you could email me with that function and you still doesn't 
have my emailadres :)

Best regards,
Huib

___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] Wikipedia Policy Interlingual Coordinationn - WP:NOT

2009-08-06 Thread Huib!
Hello,

Could you discuss this outside the list? I don't see why it would be
important for this list.

Best regards,
Huib
-- 

Http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/user:Abigor



___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] Two questions about the licensing update of media files

2009-08-04 Thread Huib!
Hello,

Wikimedia prefers material under a CC license but it will stay possible to
upload gfdl only material.

But whenever its possible try to upload it under a cc-by license or a dual
license.

Best regards,
Huib
-- 

Http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/user:Abigor



___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] British Association of Picture Libraries and Agencies sides with NPG

2009-07-28 Thread Huib!
Hello,

A mirror can be found here:

http://images.forgotten-beauty.com/NPG%20and%20BAPLA.txt

Best regards,

Huib

___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] Hungarian Wikinews licence

2009-07-21 Thread Huib!
Hello,

A different question on the same topic,

However I completely support the change to cc-by-sa-3.0, I'm wondering 
if its possible to change the cc-by-2.5 license into a cc-by-sa-3.0 
license without having to deal with big problems, when I read the 
license I find this:

This License constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with 
respect to the Work licensed here. There are no understandings, 
agreements or representations with respect to the Work not specified 
here. Licensor shall not be bound by any additional provisions that may 
appear in any communication from You. This License may not be modified 
without the mutual written agreement of the Licensor and You.

Wouldn't that mean that we must organize a big vote on that wiki that it 
will adapt a new license, or even worse there are also ip users that 
released there rights under that license.

I'm not completely sure how I must see this.

Best regards,

Huib

___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] [Slashdot] Why the Photos On Wikipedia Are So Bad

2009-07-20 Thread Huib!
Hello,

I think the writer should have looked on Commons longer and he would have
find beautifull images.

We work on Wikimedia with a lot of people doing the best the can, and the
message read above is disrespectfull to our volunteers. Nobody start with
perfect photo's, even the best photographer starts with bad pictures and
grows slowly to perfect pictures.

So yes we have pictures that are not so good, but the people that made
that photo will grow grow grow and make a perfect picture in a few years.
Commons is good in stimulating people to grow, you start with a fan
picture than you want a QI and after that you want a FP.

Huib

Http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/user:Abigor



___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] [Slashdot] Why the Photos On Wikipedia Are So Bad

2009-07-20 Thread Huib!
Hello,

I think the writer should have looked on Commons longer and he would have
find beautifull images.

We work on Wikimedia with a lot of people doing the best the can, and the
message read above is disrespectfull to our volunteers. Nobody start with
perfect photo's, even the best photographer starts with bad pictures and
grows slowly to perfect pictures.

So yes we have pictures that are not so good, but the people that made
that photo will grow grow grow and make a perfect picture in a few years.
Commons is good in stimulating people to grow, you start with a fan
picture than you want a QI and after that you want a FP.

Huib

Http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/user:Abigor



___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] Board elections candidacy period time change

2009-07-20 Thread Huib!
Hello,

I have imported the En.wiki sitenotice on Commons and Incubator.

This isn't the best way offcourse but it will let more people know about it.

Best regards,
Huib
-- 

Http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/user:Abigor



___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] Wikimedia Commons: Service project or not?

2009-06-16 Thread Huib Laurens
Hello,

I want to start with thanking Effe iets anders, this is the most neutral 
email about Commons I have seen this week, and I like the fact that 
there is a new angle to work with.

I think Commons is both a service projects and a independent project, 
Commons is a free file repository and can be used in all MediaWiki site 
from version 1.13 or higher 
(source:http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Instant_Commons ), so Commons is 
providing a service for more than 10.000 sites 
(http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Sites_using_MediaWiki).  Commons is also 
a service project for Newspapers, magazines, other sites or things that 
needs images under a free license.  I don't think somebody on Commons 
would mind if you call it a service project in this context.

All Wikimedia project sites are build in MediaWiki so Commons provides 
them the same hosting service as the do for other MediaWiki sites, only 
the big difference is that the Foundation own the servers that host 
Commons and that the Wikimedia Foundation the only organization is that 
can use Commons for hosting non free images.

When we look inside Wikimedia we have Wikipedia, Wikibooks,Wiktionary, 
Wikinews, Wikiquote, Wikisource, Wikiversety . Wikisource and Wikimedia 
Commons. Those nine projects all have there own scope and can work 
independent from the other projects, all the projects have there own 
community, policies, rules and content. When the Foundation will stop 
the could sell those projects to nine different people and all projects 
can keep working, the don't need a other project to keep existing. So 
all those project can be seen independently within the Foundation. The 
projects that stay over like Wikimania, Incubator or meta can be seen as 
projects with the soul purpose to support the nine big projects within 
the Foundation, Incubator can not work without other projects, Meta 
needs other projects to keep working also. Commons can go on with his 
own community, so does Wikipedia or Wikinews ect ect.

So we should see Commons as a inpendend project created for giving 
MediaWiki sites a free file repository, but optimized for giving extra 
service for Wikimedia projects.
  

Best regards,

Huib
* http://www.wikipedia.org*

___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] Wikimedia Commons: Service project or not?

2009-06-16 Thread Huib Laurens
effe iets anders schreef:
 Hi Huib,

 yes, that seems to be an accurate description of the current situation.
 However, what would you /want/ it to be, and /why/ ? :)

 Thanks,

 eia

 2009/6/16 Huib Laurens abi...@forgotten-beauty.com

   


Hello,

I would want it to be a independent project thats optimized for giving 
extra service to other projects. I have a few reasons for it,

1 I think when Commons would be only a service project we will get 700+ 
Wikimedia projects that wants to say a little bit about the policies on 
Commons, and that will not be good for Commons nor the other projects.  
When we say its a independent project it will mean Commons can make his 
own policies.

2 Commons is not ready to be a service project to replace local 
uploads, translations aren't good enough and there a not enough 
administrators to give enough service to all language projects.

3 If we make Commons a service project we will end up with users 
getting blocked because the are blocked on other wiki's. A independent 
Commons can be a safe harbour for users blocked from other projects to 
make a fresh start. (It happened it the past).

I believe if Commons is a service project we need to change a lot of 
things in a short time with a lot of people involved, A independent 
Commons still have to deal with the same problems, but the community can 
work on it without the need of extra interference.

Huib

___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] Wikimedia Commons: Service project or not?

2009-06-16 Thread Huib Laurens
Geoffrey Plourde schreef:
 Its only point=what is does=store images for other projects

 I was not referring to the cabinet makers, just the filing cabinets. It was 
 the closest metaphor for Commons my caffeine deprived brain could think of. 
 Following along it, a cabinet maker is one who makes cabinets. The cabinets 
 themselves are repositories. 


   


Commons does a lot more than  only store images for other projects..

Please note that there are a lot of people busy with maintaining images, 
or making images better. The goal of Commons is to make a archive full 
of free media files, not only for the WMF.

Huib

___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] Wikimedia Commons: Service project or not?

2009-06-16 Thread Huib Laurens
Yaroslav M. Blanter schreef:
 2 Commons is not ready to be a service project to replace local
 uploads, translations aren't good enough and there a not enough
 administrators to give enough service to all language projects.

 

 I am not sure what you mean. es.wp and (almost) de.wp only use Commons,
 they do not have any local uploads. And I wish all PD images which are
 stored on en.wp locally now would be ever transferred to Commons by bots.
 It could save a lot of my time. And I do not see why translators are a
 problem, translating a description to an existing Commons image is way
 easier than to store another one locally.

 Cheers
 Yaroslav

   

Yaroslav, 

I don't think the problem will be with the big projects, there are a lot of 
people who can speak the language.. The small wiki's are the most difficult and 
Commons isn't ready to handle them in a good way. It would be best if Commons 
had two admins for every language instead of none for some languages.

Huib



___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] Wikimedia Commons: Service project or not?

2009-06-16 Thread Huib Laurens
Yaroslav M. Blanter schreef:
 I don't think the problem will be with the big projects, there are a lot
 of people who can speak the language.. The small wiki's are the most
 difficult and Commons isn't ready to handle them in a good way. It would
 be best if Commons had two admins for every language instead of none for
 some languages.

 Huib


 

 Huib, but is it really a problem? I thought that actually on bigger wikis
 there are users who only speak their own language and are not keen to go
 through the interface of Commons and explain their problems to the Commons
 admins in the case of misunderstanding. But communities on small wikis
 always speak some of the bigger languages, like in Chavash wiki everybody
 speaks Russian, on Gaelic and Marathi - English, on Kechua - Spanish and
 so on. It would be nice of course to have all translations like Testwiki,
 but I think at this point five to ten bigger languages would suffice.

 Cheers
 Yaroslav


   
I think that we can not expect from users to speak a non native 
language, it would be best if everybody can be helped in there native 
language when it is needed. I'm sure lot of people can give advice in 
English or French but I know for sure that a explanetion can go wrong 
with misunderstandings if it isn't held in your native language.

And a lot of people can be scared for coming to Commons as a big wiki 
where only other language are present and your native language isn't 
there or is only there at some places.

Huib

___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


[Foundation-l] A small update from the LiCom

2009-04-23 Thread Huib Laurens
Hello colleagues,

At this time I am going to provide you with a small update from 
Licensing update committee[1].

On 12 April 2009, a vote concerning the license change[2] was opened and
announced via CentralNotice[3]. Between 12 and 19 April, 10.800 votes where
cast (including those later stricken). On 14 April, approximately 4.000
votes were recorded in 24 hours.

Discussion and questions can be expressed on Meta[4]. So far, 39
people have asked questions there, with most of them being answered 
within 24 hours.

The wiki voting system is up and running but like every system flaws and
bugs do exist[5]. Since voting started 10 bugs where reported of which 5
have been fixed. Most of the flaws were related to CentralNotice or 
localisation of the vote pages.

Voting ends at 3 May 2009, so we have a little bit more then a week to
go. If you haven’t voted yet, please do so!

Best regards,

Huib Laurens


[1]http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/LiCom
[2]http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/LU
[3]http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/LU/CN
[4]http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Licensing_update
[5]http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Licensing_update/Bugs



___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


  1   2   >