Re: [fpc-pascal] Detecting what is the linux distro

2010-10-13 Thread Sven Barth

Am 12.10.2010 19:13, schrieb Marco van de Voort:

In our previous episode, David W Noon said:

ArchLinux does not use a System V init system, but a simpler BSD one.
And thus it does not use /etc/init.d, but only /etc/rc.d.


So does the BSD init use run levels?


Yes.


One of the major distinctions
between /etc/init.d/ and /etc/rc.d is that the latter is segregated by
run levels, so that each daemon can have a different environment for
different run levels.


..  but the mark of the sysV layout is the script per daemon per runtime
level. Sometimes it is simplified by making symlinks though.

While classic (pre SysV) Unix (including BSD) has just one or two scripts
that handle everything.

Modern BSD (like current FreeBSD) currently afaik do have a script per
daemon btw, just not the added dimension of runlevels.


ArchLinux also uses only one script per daemon which is located in 
/etc/rc.d/.


The only difference that a runlevel has in ArchLinux is whether the 
multiuser or the singleuser rc file (which is in /etc/) is called. But 
this doesn't influence the daemons in /etc/rc.d/.


Regards,
Sven
___
fpc-pascal maillist  -  fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal


Re: [fpc-pascal] Detecting what is the linux distro

2010-10-12 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
On 11 October 2010 20:51, ik ido...@gmail.com wrote:

 It's sad to see that there is no specific way to get this information on all
 distro's but at least I can get it on the most used distros out there.

A general problem under Linux (and it's hundreds of distros). That is
why I think it is so important to support freedesktop.org and LSB
Foundation (Linux Standards Base). They are trying really hard to
resolve these problems, *plus* make it easier for software developers
to integrate there applications. Luckily the most popular distros
(covering probably 90% of linux usage) do try and follow those
standards.


-- 
Regards,
  - Graeme -


___
fpGUI - a cross-platform Free Pascal GUI toolkit
http://opensoft.homeip.net:8080/fpgui/
___
fpc-pascal maillist  -  fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal


Re: [fpc-pascal] Detecting what is the linux distro

2010-10-12 Thread Henry Vermaak
On 11 October 2010 19:51, ik ido...@gmail.com wrote:
 Thanks all for the answers.

 It's sad to see that there is no specific way to get this information on all
 distro's but at least I can get it on the most used distros out there.

Just curious, why would you like to detect this?

Henry
___
fpc-pascal maillist  -  fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal


Re: [fpc-pascal] Detecting what is the linux distro

2010-10-12 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
On 12 October 2010 09:30, Henry Vermaak  wrote:

 Just curious, why would you like to detect this?

I don't know about the original poster, but I for one use such
information for our custom security components - generating trial
unlock keys for our commercial software.


-- 
Regards,
  - Graeme -


___
fpGUI - a cross-platform Free Pascal GUI toolkit
http://opensoft.homeip.net:8080/fpgui/
___
fpc-pascal maillist  -  fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal


Re: [fpc-pascal] Detecting what is the linux distro

2010-10-12 Thread ik
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 09:30, Henry Vermaak henry.verm...@gmail.comwrote:

 On 11 October 2010 19:51, ik ido...@gmail.com wrote:
  Thanks all for the answers.
 
  It's sad to see that there is no specific way to get this information on
 all
  distro's but at least I can get it on the most used distros out there.

 Just curious, why would you like to detect this?


You want to know how to install files for daemons, append information in
other existed packages etc... But instead of creating 1000% packages types
for each distro, you can for example know  that Gentoo and ArchLinux uses
/etc/rc.d/ for init deamons.
You know that Debian, CentOS, RedHat and few others uses /etc/init.d/ etc...


BTW I had a program that created in my ArchLinux /etc/init.d/ and placed it
there, while i was the wrong location.



 Henry
 ___
 fpc-pascal maillist  -  fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
 http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal





Ido

LINESIP websites:
http://www.linesip.com
http://www.linesip.co.il
___
fpc-pascal maillist  -  fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal

Re: [fpc-pascal] Detecting what is the linux distro

2010-10-12 Thread David W Noon
On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 09:54:35 +0200, ik wrote about Re: [fpc-pascal]
Detecting what is the linux distro:

 On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 09:30, Henry Vermaak
 henry.verm...@gmail.comwrote:
[snip]
  Just curious, why would you like to detect this?
 
 
 You want to know how to install files for daemons, append information
 in other existed packages etc... But instead of creating 1000%
 packages types for each distro, you can for example know  that Gentoo
 and ArchLinux uses /etc/rc.d/ for init deamons.
 You know that Debian, CentOS, RedHat and few others uses /etc/init.d/
 etc...

Both of those directories are used by virtually all UNIX
implementations. /etc/init.d/ contains the init scripts for system
daemons, whereas /etc/rc.d/ contains the configuration files that are
interpolated into the init scripts to establish environment variables
for the daemons.  These directories do not have an either/or
relationship.

This is a consequence of using an init process based on the System V
model.

Why don't you just use a package manager, such as apt/dpkg, Portage,
RPM, etc., instead?  Most distros can handle more than one of these.
For example, I run Gentoo, and it will handle .deb and .rpm packages,
as well as its native Portage ebuilds.
-- 
Regards,

Dave  [RLU #314465]
*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
david.w.n...@ntlworld.com (David W Noon)
*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
fpc-pascal maillist  -  fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal

Re: [fpc-pascal] Detecting what is the linux distro

2010-10-12 Thread Sven Barth

Am 12.10.2010 14:01, schrieb David W Noon:

On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 09:54:35 +0200, ik wrote about Re: [fpc-pascal]
Detecting what is the linux distro:


On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 09:30, Henry Vermaak
henry.verm...@gmail.comwrote:

[snip]

Just curious, why would you like to detect this?



You want to know how to install files for daemons, append information
in other existed packages etc... But instead of creating 1000%
packages types for each distro, you can for example know  that Gentoo
and ArchLinux uses /etc/rc.d/ for init deamons.
You know that Debian, CentOS, RedHat and few others uses /etc/init.d/
etc...


Both of those directories are used by virtually all UNIX
implementations. /etc/init.d/ contains the init scripts for system
daemons, whereas /etc/rc.d/ contains the configuration files that are
interpolated into the init scripts to establish environment variables
for the daemons.  These directories do not have an either/or
relationship.

This is a consequence of using an init process based on the System V
model.



ArchLinux does not use a System V init system, but a simpler BSD one. 
And thus it does not use /etc/init.d, but only /etc/rc.d.



Why don't you just use a package manager, such as apt/dpkg, Portage,
RPM, etc., instead?  Most distros can handle more than one of these.
For example, I run Gentoo, and it will handle .deb and .rpm packages,
as well as its native Portage ebuilds.


ArchLinux handles only its own ArchLinux Package Manager format 
(basically a .tar.gz with some script files) - as far as I'm aware of.


Regards,
Sven
___
fpc-pascal maillist  -  fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal


Re: [fpc-pascal] Detecting what is the linux distro

2010-10-12 Thread David W Noon
On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 16:29:42 +0200, Sven Barth wrote about Re:
[fpc-pascal] Detecting what is the linux distro:

 Am 12.10.2010 14:01, schrieb David W Noon:
[snip]
  This is a consequence of using an init process based on the System V
  model.
 
 ArchLinux does not use a System V init system, but a simpler BSD one. 
 And thus it does not use /etc/init.d, but only /etc/rc.d.

So does the BSD init use run levels?  One of the major distinctions
between /etc/init.d/ and /etc/rc.d is that the latter is segregated by
run levels, so that each daemon can have a different environment for
different run levels.  All of the actual init scripts in my /etc/rc.d/
ultimately resolve to symlinks into /etc/init.d/, which is typical for
any System V style system.

Indeed, this makes installing a script directly into /etc/rc.d/ a
strict no-no under Gentoo, as all insertions into a run level have to
be performed by the sysadmin by hand; other Linuxes are more
permissive, though.  Consequently, I would never want any program to
install anything into that directory, except by the rc-update program
run by hand.
-- 
Regards,

Dave  [RLU #314465]
*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
david.w.n...@ntlworld.com (David W Noon)
*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
fpc-pascal maillist  -  fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal

Re: [fpc-pascal] Detecting what is the linux distro

2010-10-12 Thread ik
It's not just that. Lets say you have a UI for IPTables. In Redhat based, it
will be located under /etc/sysconfig/iptables . On debian based, it should
be under /etc/networking/post-config or something like that (don't have a
debian based machine here), and so on...

Please note that I do not talk about exited scripts such as Arno's scripts
or shorewall, just plain IPTables client, and it's different on each distro.

If you require to read settings of the system (that located at /etc/), no
one guarantee you that all distro's will store then at the same place.

That's the reason why so many software/driver vendors are so reluctant to
release Linux support.
For example Foomatic drivers for CUPS, the drivers of the printers in Mac
OS-X are the same as with Linux, but many vendors ignore Linux just because
this mess.

So it's not just lets create a package and get over with it, It's not that
simple.

Ido

LINESIP websites:
http://www.linesip.com
http://www.linesip.co.il




On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 14:01, David W Noon david.w.n...@ntlworld.comwrote:

 On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 09:54:35 +0200, ik wrote about Re: [fpc-pascal]
 Detecting what is the linux distro:

  On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 09:30, Henry Vermaak
  henry.verm...@gmail.comwrote:
 [snip]
   Just curious, why would you like to detect this?
  
 
  You want to know how to install files for daemons, append information
  in other existed packages etc... But instead of creating 1000%
  packages types for each distro, you can for example know  that Gentoo
  and ArchLinux uses /etc/rc.d/ for init deamons.
  You know that Debian, CentOS, RedHat and few others uses /etc/init.d/
  etc...

 Both of those directories are used by virtually all UNIX
 implementations. /etc/init.d/ contains the init scripts for system
 daemons, whereas /etc/rc.d/ contains the configuration files that are
 interpolated into the init scripts to establish environment variables
 for the daemons.  These directories do not have an either/or
 relationship.

 This is a consequence of using an init process based on the System V
 model.

 Why don't you just use a package manager, such as apt/dpkg, Portage,
 RPM, etc., instead?  Most distros can handle more than one of these.
 For example, I run Gentoo, and it will handle .deb and .rpm packages,
 as well as its native Portage ebuilds.
 --
 Regards,

 Dave  [RLU #314465]
 *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
 david.w.n...@ntlworld.com (David W Noon)
 *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*

 ___
 fpc-pascal maillist  -  fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
 http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal

___
fpc-pascal maillist  -  fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal

Re: [fpc-pascal] Detecting what is the linux distro

2010-10-12 Thread Henry Vermaak
On 12 October 2010 17:06, ik ido...@gmail.com wrote:
 It's not just that. Lets say you have a UI for IPTables. In Redhat based, it
 will be located under /etc/sysconfig/iptables . On debian based, it should
 be under /etc/networking/post-config or something like that (don't have a
 debian based machine here), and so on...

 Please note that I do not talk about exited scripts such as Arno's scripts
 or shorewall, just plain IPTables client, and it's different on each distro.

 If you require to read settings of the system (that located at /etc/), no
 one guarantee you that all distro's will store then at the same place.

You can't rely on these things.  Distros will even change things from
version to version.  That is why you put things in configuration files
and let the maintainers/packagers supply the correct settings in the
config files for their distro.  This is how hundreds of apps do
things.

 That's the reason why so many software/driver vendors are so reluctant to
 release Linux support.

Nonsense.  Most vendors are lazy, some are scared of licensing, etc.
Most importantly they think they can get away with not supporting
linux because of the small market share.  For now.

Henry
___
fpc-pascal maillist  -  fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal


Re: [fpc-pascal] Detecting what is the linux distro

2010-10-12 Thread Marco van de Voort
In our previous episode, David W Noon said:
  ArchLinux does not use a System V init system, but a simpler BSD one. 
  And thus it does not use /etc/init.d, but only /etc/rc.d.
 
 So does the BSD init use run levels? 

Yes.

 One of the major distinctions
 between /etc/init.d/ and /etc/rc.d is that the latter is segregated by
 run levels, so that each daemon can have a different environment for
 different run levels.

..  but the mark of the sysV layout is the script per daemon per runtime
level. Sometimes it is simplified by making symlinks though.

While classic (pre SysV) Unix (including BSD) has just one or two scripts
that handle everything.

Modern BSD (like current FreeBSD) currently afaik do have a script per
daemon btw, just not the added dimension of runlevels.

___
fpc-pascal maillist  -  fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal


Re: [fpc-pascal] Detecting what is the linux distro

2010-10-11 Thread Torsten Bonde Christiansen

On 2010-10-11 13:33, ik wrote:

Hello List,

I'm looking for a proper way to detect the type of Linux distro.

At first I thought about /etc/issue, but it seems that some are 
abusing this file.
Many distro's uses /etc/__release, where  is their name, but 
it's not a proper way either to detect, because not everyone uses it.


Any additional ideas ?
Most distros also include their name in the  kernel, so using uname -a 
could also give a hint. But AFAIK there is no common place where all 
distros store the name.


Kind regards,
Torsten Bonde Christiansen.
___
fpc-pascal maillist  -  fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal


Re: [fpc-pascal] Detecting what is the linux distro

2010-10-11 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
On 11 October 2010 13:33, ik ido...@gmail.com wrote:

 At first I thought about /etc/issue, but it seems that some are abusing this
 file.
 Many distro's uses /etc/__release, where  is their name, but it's
 not a proper way either to detect, because not everyone uses it.

 Any additional ideas ?


If your distro complies with the LSB standards (most popular distros
do), then you should have a /etc/lsb-release text file that you can
parse.



~ $ cd /etc
etc $ ls -l lsb-release
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 104 2010-07-08 16:55 lsb-release

etc $ cat lsb-release
DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu
DISTRIB_RELEASE=10.04
DISTRIB_CODENAME=lucid
DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION=Ubuntu 10.04.1 LTS




-- 
Regards,
  - Graeme -


___
fpGUI - a cross-platform Free Pascal GUI toolkit
http://opensoft.homeip.net:8080/fpgui/
___
fpc-pascal maillist  -  fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal


Re: [fpc-pascal] Detecting what is the linux distro

2010-10-11 Thread silvioprog
2010/10/11 ik ido...@gmail.com

 Hello List,

 I'm looking for a proper way to detect the type of Linux distro.

 At first I thought about /etc/issue, but it seems that some are abusing
 this file.
 Many distro's uses /etc/__release, where  is their name, but it's
 not a proper way either to detect, because not everyone uses it.

 Any additional ideas ?


 Thanks,

 Ido


Please, see the function LSGetLinuxDistro (
code.google.com/p/lazsolutions/source/browse/trunk/Core/LSUtils.pas#55);

-- 
Silvio Clécio,
*programmer* *ObjectPascal*
___
fpc-pascal maillist  -  fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal

Re: [fpc-pascal] Detecting what is the linux distro

2010-10-11 Thread Marco van de Voort
In our previous episode, Graeme Geldenhuys said:
  file.
  Many distro's uses /etc/__release, where  is their name, but it's
  not a proper way either to detect, because not everyone uses it.
 
  Any additional ideas ?
 
 
 If your distro complies with the LSB standards (most popular distros
 do), then you should have a /etc/lsb-release text file that you can
 parse.

FC11, no such file, but there is a dir lsb-release.d with the contents

 0 -rw-r--r--.   1 root root 0 2010-06-25 11:25 core-4.0-ia32
 0 -rw-r--r--.   1 root root 0 2010-06-25 11:25 core-4.0-noarch
 0 -rw-r--r--.   1 root root 0 2010-06-25 11:25 graphics-4.0-ia32
 0 -rw-r--r--.   1 root root 0 2010-06-25 11:25 graphics-4.0-noarch
 0 -rw-r--r--.   1 root root 0 2010-06-25 11:25 printing-4.0-ia32
 0 -rw-r--r--.   1 root root 0 2010-06-25 11:25 printing-4.0-noarch


 
___
fpc-pascal maillist  -  fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal


Re: [fpc-pascal] Detecting what is the linux distro

2010-10-11 Thread Michalis Kamburelis
Marco van de Voort wrote:
 If your distro complies with the LSB standards (most popular distros
 do), then you should have a /etc/lsb-release text file that you can
 parse.
 
 FC11, no such file, but there is a dir lsb-release.d with the contents
 

You're not really supposed to be looking at /etc/lsb* files directly.
Rather you should run lsb_release. Try lsb_release  --all. For the
short name of the distribution, something like lsb_release --id
--short is appropriate, see the manpage.

Michalis
___
fpc-pascal maillist  -  fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal


Re: [fpc-pascal] Detecting what is the linux distro

2010-10-11 Thread ik
Thanks all for the answers.

It's sad to see that there is no specific way to get this information on all
distro's but at least I can get it on the most used distros out there.

Ido
___
fpc-pascal maillist  -  fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal