Re: [Frameworks] 16mm questions
Dear Gyula Nemes, Never put film in your checked luggage because the Xray machines are much stronger for the hold. You can see those effects in the film Degradation 1 by James Schneider (there are stills on his website: http://blog.jamesjune.info/films.html). He put his film successively through more and more airports. Hand luggage scanners are not as strong, but the effect is cumulative. When I flew from Paris to interview Brakhage in Victoria, I changed planes in New York and Vancouver, going through hand-luggage xray six times, and there are visible white dot patterns in the dark areas of the image. (Maybe the scanners were stronger in 2003 just after 9/11, or perhaps it's a bit easier to ask for a hand check now.) Using lead bags doesn't help much because when they can't see what's inside, they turn up the xray power to get an image. The workaround we developed at L'Abominable are stickers for your film cans that look just like Kodak labels, but show the film to be 3200ASA. The airport workers know that their scanners will damage such sensitive film so they automatically opt for a hand swipe or check. You can bring a changing bag with you so that they can open the can in the darkness. Try the sticker attached here: EtiketXRAY.pdf. -Pip Chodorov EtiketXRAY.pdf Description: Adobe PDF document ___ FrameWorks mailing list FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
Re: [Frameworks] Steenbeck ST928 - polygon prism seized
Bad belts are the cause of many problems, even machines that are not used too often get their belts ruined by just ageing. The plastic gets very brittle with age even if taken care of. Recently I found some belts that were not even used and the plastic had all but turned to dust. ___ FrameWorks mailing list FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
Re: [Frameworks] Oskar Fischinger Installation
very nice! On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 4:22 PM, Dominic Angerame < dominic.anger...@gmail.com> wrote: > I went to the opening of the Oskar Fischinger installation at the > Weinstein Gallery in San Francisco on Saturday December 16th. This > exhibition was curated by Cindy Keefer. It was fantastic. Unfortunately I > was the only experimental filmmaker at this event. > > If you have not seen it, it is a must. > > http://www.weinstein.com/exhibitions/ > > ___ > FrameWorks mailing list > FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com > https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks > > ___ FrameWorks mailing list FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
[Frameworks] Oskar Fischinger Installation
I went to the opening of the Oskar Fischinger installation at the Weinstein Gallery in San Francisco on Saturday December 16th. This exhibition was curated by Cindy Keefer. It was fantastic. Unfortunately I was the only experimental filmmaker at this event. If you have not seen it, it is a must. http://www.weinstein.com/exhibitions/ ___ FrameWorks mailing list FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
Re: [Frameworks] 16mm questions
I did have a bad experience with 35mm Fuji Reala film once (500asa) that was fogged by an airport x-ray. I suspect it was a more powerful x-ray than the regular ones that scan your carry on, because it happened in Air Canada Cargo while being shipped. The fogging was quite evident throughout a significant number of rolls, and it looked like light leaks from opening a can. We could not reshoot, but a brilliant VFX person in Halifax worked on a digital fix for it, (he wrote an algorithm specifically for this fix), and to this day I am one of the very few people who probably notice anything. All I see is very subtle fluctuations in the deepest blacks. Anyway, the lesson is that the shippers and cargo areas probably use more lethal xrays than the consumer ones in the normal security lines. I still have a black lead-lined bag for film at home. Not sure of the legality of using those now, if you can even find them. Maybe do a search online. Christopher On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 4:35 PM, Amanda Thomsonwrote: > A couple of years ago I took a suitcase full of exposed, but unprocessed > film (from print stock to Tri-X, including the Agfa stock previously > mentioned) over the Atlantic to Europe as checked luggage where it crossed > through roughly 8 x-rays before I processed it all at L'Abominable in Paris. > > I'm no expert in fogging/image quality and truth be told I did shoot a > reasonable amount of clouds and smog from forest fires, but the the images > showed no obvious signs of X-ray fog. This includes the Agfa 200D which > was shot in clear conditions. There was another issue with some of it, > that I later realized was bromide drag, but that's something else > altogether (it has to do with agitation). > > All this lead me to believe that the fear of passing film through X-rays > is a bit exaggerated. But of course this is only my experience... > > Amanda > > -- > > https://vimeo.com/amandat > http://www.irisfilmcollective.com > > -- Forwarded message -- > From: Scott Dorsey > To: frameworks@jonasmekasfilms.com > Cc: > Bcc: > Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 13:01:34 -0500 > Subject: Re: [Frameworks] 16mm questions > The effect is cumulative. One pass might not hurt... ten likely will. > Measure fog density and you'll know, but of course by then it's too late. > --scott > > > -- Forwarded message -- >> From: nemes gyula >> To: frameworks@jonasmekasfilms.com >> Cc: >> Bcc: >> Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 13:57:18 +0100 >> Subject: [Frameworks] 16mm questions >> Dear celluloid enthusiasts, >> >> I'm working on 16mm Bolex, travelling worldwide. >> Can I ask you some advices? >> >> 1.Do you have any experiences in airport x-ray damages? Is x-ray >> effective or not? Do lead-line bags protect the material or make even more >> problems with security guards? >> Airports say it's OK till 400 ISO, Kodak shows the damages caused by >> x-ray. >> Do you know any courier without x-ray checking? >> >> 2.Do you know any 16mm material produced presently besides Kodak? >> The only one I know is Foma, a bad quality reversal material for same >> prize as Kodak. >> >> Any advices highly appreciated. >> >> Best, >> >> Gyula Nemes >> Hungary >> >> -- >> Nemes Gyula >> Playtime >> Absolut Film Studio >> Budapest 1025 Pusztaszeri út 11-13. >> +36 20 9856277 <+36%2020%20985%206277> >> https://vimeo.com/user4774101 >> www.zerofilm.hu >> fb: Zero - Nemes Gyula filmje >> #zero_film_official >> >> > ___ > FrameWorks mailing list > FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com > https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks > > ___ FrameWorks mailing list FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
Re: [Frameworks] 16mm questions
A couple of years ago I took a suitcase full of exposed, but unprocessed film (from print stock to Tri-X, including the Agfa stock previously mentioned) over the Atlantic to Europe as checked luggage where it crossed through roughly 8 x-rays before I processed it all at L'Abominable in Paris. I'm no expert in fogging/image quality and truth be told I did shoot a reasonable amount of clouds and smog from forest fires, but the the images showed no obvious signs of X-ray fog. This includes the Agfa 200D which was shot in clear conditions. There was another issue with some of it, that I later realized was bromide drag, but that's something else altogether (it has to do with agitation). All this lead me to believe that the fear of passing film through X-rays is a bit exaggerated. But of course this is only my experience... Amanda -- https://vimeo.com/amandat http://www.irisfilmcollective.com -- Forwarded message -- From: Scott DorseyTo: frameworks@jonasmekasfilms.com Cc: Bcc: Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 13:01:34 -0500 Subject: Re: [Frameworks] 16mm questions The effect is cumulative. One pass might not hurt... ten likely will. Measure fog density and you'll know, but of course by then it's too late. --scott -- Forwarded message -- > From: nemes gyula > To: frameworks@jonasmekasfilms.com > Cc: > Bcc: > Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 13:57:18 +0100 > Subject: [Frameworks] 16mm questions > Dear celluloid enthusiasts, > > I'm working on 16mm Bolex, travelling worldwide. > Can I ask you some advices? > > 1.Do you have any experiences in airport x-ray damages? Is x-ray effective > or not? Do lead-line bags protect the material or make even more problems > with security guards? > Airports say it's OK till 400 ISO, Kodak shows the damages caused by x-ray. > Do you know any courier without x-ray checking? > > 2.Do you know any 16mm material produced presently besides Kodak? > The only one I know is Foma, a bad quality reversal material for same > prize as Kodak. > > Any advices highly appreciated. > > Best, > > Gyula Nemes > Hungary > > -- > Nemes Gyula > Playtime > Absolut Film Studio > Budapest 1025 Pusztaszeri út 11-13. > +36 20 9856277 <+36%2020%20985%206277> > https://vimeo.com/user4774101 > www.zerofilm.hu > fb: Zero - Nemes Gyula filmje > #zero_film_official > > ___ FrameWorks mailing list FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
Re: [Frameworks] 16mm questions
Thank you so much for your answers, dear friends. It looks airport x-ray doesn't effect the material that much. The best price/quality option is still Kodak, and those frozen Fuji materials which I also use recently. All the best, 2017-12-18 21:31 GMT+01:00 Sean Weitzel: > And it's polyester. > > On Dec 18, 2017 10:03 AM, "Scott Dorsey" wrote: > >> > Wittner Chrome is also making some colour reversal film, although >> > overpriced : >> >> Actually, that's from the remaining Agfa stock. It's an Agfa aerial film >> rebadged. >> --scott >> ___ >> FrameWorks mailing list >> FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com >> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks >> > > ___ > FrameWorks mailing list > FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com > https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks > > -- Nemes Gyula Playtime Absolut Film Studio Budapest 1025 Pusztaszeri út 11-13. +36 20 9856277 www.zerofilm.hu fb: Zero - Nemes Gyula filmje #zero_film_official ___ FrameWorks mailing list FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
Re: [Frameworks] Experimental Films before 1910
Thanks to all. I especially appreciate Jonathan Walley's skepticism bout the entire venture! I share that skepticism, actually all the best, Mark On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 6:50 AM,wrote: > > As some of this is perhaps about intent and ways of thinking I'd push for > you to consider those that were never made. Leopold Survage, designs for > his 'Le Rythme Colore' for instance. OK it dates from 1913 but being > flexible with dates could accomodate an ever so slightly wider range of > material. > > > > > || > NACHLEBEN FILM LAB AND ARCHIVE > http://www.nachleben.org.uk > CUBE CINEMA. BRISTOL > http://www.cubecinema.com/ > > || > > On Wed, 13 Dec 2017, Mark Street wrote: > > Hey All, >> >> Preparing a brief talk on The Experimental Impulse in Early Cinema >> thinking about how it ALL was that way by >> definition early on; an inventory of tricks, effusions, failed and >> successful experiments. >> >> Any favorites anyone can recommend? >> >> Mark >> >> >> >> > ___ > FrameWorks mailing list > FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com > https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks > > ___ FrameWorks mailing list FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
[Frameworks] Expressing love and gratitude. Let's celebrate our best year ever with highlights and films from 2017!
A letter from our Founder and Director, Steve Cossman Warm wishes to my friends and colleagues, I’m writing to let you know that thanks to you and your involvement with MONO NO AWARE, our community has had the best year ever. This year’s activities have earned the attention of the New York Times, (https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/11/nyregion/a-brooklyn-film-school-where-the-digital-revolution-didnt-happen.html) MovieMaker Magazine, Wave Farm, and the New York State Council for the Arts (NYSCA), who recently awarded MONO preliminary funding for next year's programming! We could not have done this without your help. Whether you’re a former workshop participant, audience member, exhibiting artist, a one-time renter or a year-round friend, you’ve made a contribution that has allowed us to offer affordable workshops to over 500 participants, present a dozen in-person screenings, make cameras and projectors accessible on a weekly basis, distribute film stock and chemistry, provide critical project support, editing facilities, and given us the ability to commission new moving image works by contemporary artists. I hope that as a member of this community, you share the feeling of pride we all have in these accomplishments. With new growth comes new challenges, and somehow we manage to operate with a part-time volunteer staff, out of a small office in downtown Brooklyn. My hope is that you believe in the hard work we are doing—building a film-positive community, with affordable, all-ages and equal access to cinema tools and technology (http://mononoawarefilm.com/) — (http://mononoawarefilm.com/) and that you are able to show your support with a tax-deductible donation. Your generous contribution to MONO means that we can continue to empower our community members, engage with a diverse audience and provide critical support to the production and exhibition of films by under-recognized voices and artists. There is nothing quite like the community surrounding MONO NO AWARE and no other organization is as active in the education of traditional film making, offering continued support through multiple initiatives. MONO's ability to offer extremely affordable rates gives a diverse group of artists access to all the materials necessary; from the film stock itself and the camera to shoot it with, to the facilities and chemistry to process, right down to the projector and the screen to present the work on. We are a leader in commissioning, supporting and exhibiting moving image art in a variety of forms. Please consider making a special year-end donation of $50, $100, $250 or more (https://www.paypal.com/donate/?token=RnAztIGjqfG9e0_rv1pH-OX-IusbWQt7qV0gcjppIJJA10fS0Bo2BNa99UY_vxjyzcztdm=US=US) — your contribution will have a direct impact on our upcoming year. All donations are tax-deductible, (https://www.paypal.com/donate/?token=RnAztIGjqfG9e0_rv1pH-OX-IusbWQt7qV0gcjppIJJA10fS0Bo2BNa99UY_vxjyzcztdm=US=US) and for those local to the greater NYC area, a contribution comes with a personal invitation to our special 2018 kick-off party with great music, hot food, friends and a special slide-show detailing the new lab space / facilities that we are building for you. Thank you for again your continued support and friendship. If you have a moment, take a look below to explore just a few of the highlights of our 2017. Best to you all, I look forward to seeing you next year, Steve Cossman Founder / Executive Director MONO NO AWARE est. 2007 http://17.performa-arts.org/events/yto-barrada http://mononoawarefilm.com/beach-retreat-workshop https://www.thefotomat.com/ https://mononoawarefilm.com/archive-julie-orlick https://www.facebook.com/mononoawarefilm/posts/1463912336964221 http://mononoawarefilm.com/film-stock/ http://mononoawarefilm.com/workshops/ https://www.facebook.com/search/top/?q=BYO-B%2Fw%20Mixer%20%26%20Free%20Workshop%20Party http://mononoawarefilm.com/workshops/ ** (https://www.instagram.com/mononoawarefilm/) ** InstagraMono (https://www.instagram.com/mononoawarefilm/) ** (https://www.facebook.com/mono.aware.9) ** FaceBookNoAware (https://www.facebook.com/mono.aware.9) ** MONO NO AWARE (EIN 46-4573533) is a 501(c)3 public charity; all contributions are tax-deductible to the extent permitted by law. (https://www.paypal.com/donate/?token=0IVgE1NRQO3LDJarvO1s0mwz8GLLGoQ1GAQzKzQJ05AJC2-h7CqKEasbdkuxMGB5ukC-5m=US=US) Our mailing address is: MONO NO AWARE 302 Bedford Ave Unit # 303 Brooklyn, NY 11211 USA Want to change how you receive these emails? You can ** update your preferences (https://mononoawarefilm.us2.list-manage.com/profile?u=bbedd09018bc9a2583cc18643=d4c6ef209a=2876e3f04b) . This email was sent to frameworks@jonasmekasfilms.com (mailto:frameworks@jonasmekasfilms.com) why did I get this?