Re: [Frameworks] First person narrative

2012-02-24 Thread Jim Flannery
Friday, February 24, 2012, 1:40:54 PM, one wrote:

 Thursday, February 23, 2012, 12:54:38 PM, one wrote:

 I'm guessing from the OP that only Ferris Bueller counts as what Gene
 is asking for, the others being examples of interior monologues.
 ...
 * interior non-diegetic:
   We only hear the characters via voice-over, but they are talking to
   US, breaking the 'fourth-wall' (Example: Sunset Boulevard, The
   Opposite of Sex)

 Actually, Clockwork Orange counts here too. Alex is not talking to
 himself in filmic time, he's narrating in past tense to us (or rather,
 to an audience addressed as O My Brothers who diegetically may be
 interpreted as a post-hospital new set of droogies, but really reduces
 to us, audience-implicationwise).

Actually to be more precise, I was thinking that CO is in the same mode
as Sunset Blvd ... which it is, but neither of them satisfies Gene's
original request, because they're in *past tense*. I haven't seen The
Opposite of Sex so I can't tell if it belongs 

What characteristics might distinguish a *first person present tense*
voice *NOT* to be an interior monolog? I mean to say, couldn't *any*
of the first be interpreted as the second?

-- 
 Jim Flannery
 j...@newgrangemedia.com


___
FrameWorks mailing list
FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks


Re: [Frameworks] First person narrative

2012-02-24 Thread Pip Chodorov
Robert Nelson's Bleu Shut which references the clock in the corner 
of the screen, so the viewer will know how much time is left in case 
he or she is bored.

Christopher Maclaine's The End also addresses the viewer in the 
present tense.

But these two examples may be more 2nd person than 1st person because 
you is used more often than I. Though in the Christan Metz sense, 
I is not the filmmaker speaking but the film itself.

Then of course there are Peter Rose's Secondary Currents and 
Michael Snow's So Is This in which the film is speaking in the 
first person present tense as an utterer of film-speech and there is 
no interior monologue but only direct monologue, even if these ramble 
and take tangents, etc.

-Pip


At 15:03 -0800 24/02/12, Jim Flannery wrote:
What characteristics might distinguish a *first person present tense*
voice *NOT* to be an interior monolog? I mean to say, couldn't *any*
of the first be interpreted as the second?
___
FrameWorks mailing list
FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks


Re: [Frameworks] First person narrative

2012-02-24 Thread David Tetzlaff
 Actually to be more precise, I was thinking that CO is in the same mode
 as Sunset Blvd ... which it is, but neither of them satisfies Gene's
 original request, because they're in *past tense*. I haven't seen The
 Opposite of Sex so I can't tell if it belongs.

It's grammatically past tense too, though like a lot of narration in fiction 
it's restricted. That is, though the narrator would seem to be speaking from a 
point in time well beyond the events being depicted, they rarely reveal any 
'spoilers' any sense that they know what's coming.

(Gene has clarified that his interest is not in fiction at all, but we can 
still talk about it...)


 What characteristics might distinguish a *first person present tense*
 voice *NOT* to be an interior monolog? I mean to say, couldn't *any*
 of the first be interpreted as the second?


Well, there's two different things there. My little four-part distinction 
didn't consider the question of tense. So if you add all of the different 
temporal relationships direct address might have to the unfolding events (which 
themselves might or might not be in chronological order) there'd be a lot more 
categories.

But to answer the specific question, 'first person, present tense' would NOT be 
'interior monolog' in any case where we see the character speaking. That is, 
what 'interior monolog' is interior to is the characters' mind.

This does not necessarily mean the characters' are 'talking to themselves.' 
Alex is not addressing an actual group of Droogs. He's imagining an audience. 
But it's not clear where and when he is doing so, or whether this space/time is 
within the diegesis or the character has been plucked out of his fictionsl 
world to some meta-position via 'the miracle of cinems'. In 'Taxi Driver' 
Travis's monologues would seem to be entries he's recording into a diary -- 
(which makes them a mixture of present and past tense, FWIW).

So, anyway, Ferris Beuller and Moonlighting are not interior monologs, nor are 
Shakespearean asides and so forth. Not that this distinction necessarily makes 
a difference. Exterior monologs may serve the same function as interior 
monologues -- obviously traditional theater doesn't employ disembodied 
voice-over, so characters may speak their thoughts as a convention. Hamlet's 
soliloquy is external diegetic. In contrast, Ronnie's monolog at the beginning 
of Act 2 of The House of Blue Leaves is external non-diegetic because he is 
breaking the fourth wall and speaking to us as an audience. There's not much 
external-monolog in fiction films, since voice-over is easier to do and a well 
established convention. So deviating from that convention, as Ferris Bueller 
does, signifies something or serves some additional function, though I don't 
know what, whether there's any consistency from film to film, or whether it's 
particularly important in the big scheme of things.


___
FrameWorks mailing list
FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks


[Frameworks] First person narrative

2012-02-23 Thread Gene Youngblood
Colleagues,
Can anyone think of narrative (or storytelling) films that use the 
first-person, present tense (subjective) mode of address, other than in 
interior monologues? It must be done through speech, so “direct cinema” (a form 
of storytelling) doesn’t count. Examples, if there are any, can be from any 
tradition, commercial to experimental.

___
FrameWorks mailing list
FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks


Re: [Frameworks] First person narrative

2012-02-23 Thread Jean-Louis Seguin

On 2012-02-23, at 11:01 AM, Gene Youngblood wrote:

 Colleagues,
 Can anyone think of narrative (or storytelling) films that use the 
 first-person, present tense (subjective) mode of address, other than in 
 interior monologues? It must be done through speech, so “direct cinema” (a 
 form of storytelling) doesn’t count. Examples, if there are any, can be from 
 any tradition, commercial to experimental.




A Clockwork Orange

Taxi Driver

Full Metal Jacket

Ferris Bueller's Day Off (on-camera)

Cheers,
Jean-Louis___
FrameWorks mailing list
FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks


Re: [Frameworks] First person narrative (Shira Segal)

2012-02-23 Thread Mark Toscano
Georg by Stanton Kaye

Mark T






 From: jaime cleeland ethnom...@yahoo.co.uk
To: Experimental Film Discussion List frameworks@jonasmekasfilms.com 
Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2012 12:18 PM
Subject: Re: [Frameworks] First person narrative (Shira Segal)
 

The use of the camera  i.e puts forth the camera as
a primary means of expression for artists (S.Segal)  I was recently asking 
Jeffrey Paull (is he still on this listserv ?) about ... what I call 
'camera-dicking'  weilding the camera as a phallus... can anyone give me any 
pointers for reading ... as far as film go I was thinking of something like 
Michael Powers 'Peeping Tom'.



 From: Shira Segal sbse...@indiana.edu
To: frameworks@jonasmekasfilms.com 
Sent: Thursday, 23 February 2012, 18:40
Subject: Re: [Frameworks] First person narrative (Shira Segal)
 

Dear Gene and Frameworks,

Last semester I designed a First Person Cinema course in the Dept. of 
Communication and Culture at Indiana University that you might find helpful 
(syllabus attached as PDF). I am pleased as punch that my students continue to 
post on our corresponding class blog: http://firstpersoninternet.tumblr.com/

I am looking forward to hearing about further examples of first person cinema!

best,
Shira Segal

--
PhD Film and Media Studies
Dept. of Communication and Culture
Indiana University

Visiting Lecturer
Dept. of Radio, Television and Film
Northwestern
 University

www.shirasegal.com


 Colleagues,
 Can anyone think of narrative (or storytelling) films that use the
 first-person, present tense (subjective) mode of address, other than
 in interior monologues? It must be done through speech, so ?direct
 cinema? (a form of storytelling) doesn?t count. Examples, if there
 are any, can be from any tradition, commercial to experimental.


___
FrameWorks mailing list
FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks



___
FrameWorks mailing list
FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks___
FrameWorks mailing list
FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks


Re: [Frameworks] First person narrative

2012-02-23 Thread David Tetzlaff
I'm guessing from the OP that only Ferris Bueller counts as what Gene is asking 
for, the others being examples of interior monologues. Another question, Gene, 
is whether you are seeking examples of this that occur as exceptions within 
more conventional narrative address, or only instances that dominate the 
narrative, or only examples where the whole story is told in this form?

There would really be 4 fundamental categories of character speech here (as 
well as examples that blur the distinctions). It might help, Gene, if you could 
be more specific about your inquiry along these lines.

* interior diegetic: 
What we hear via voiceover is what we imagine the characters are thinking, they 
are talking to themselves inside the world of the story. (Example: Taxi Driver) 
Again, I'm assuming that this is what you DON'T want.

* interior non-diegetic:
We only hear the characters via voice-over, but they are talking to US, 
breaking the 'fourth-wall'
(Example: Sunset Boulevard, The Opposite of Sex)
 If you think I'm just plucky and scrappy and all I need is love, you're in 
 over your heads. I don't have a heart of gold and I *don't* grow one later, 
 OK? But relax. There's other people a lot nicer coming up - we call them 
 losers.

* exterior diegetic
We see and hear the characters speak at the camera directly, but the camera is 
part of the diegesis. Examples would include 'cinema verite' documentary (which 
differs from direct cinema in being interuptive rather than merely 
observational), diary films (Sherman's March, Pincus). Double Indemnity. All 
the 'found-footage' fictions like Blair Witch Project or where parts of the 
narratives are told via 'news' footage (District 9). 

* exterior non-diegetic
We see and hear the characters speak at US directly, breaking the 4th wall, and 
other characters in the diegesis are not aware of these asides. (Examples: 
Ferris Bueller, the TV show 'Moonlighting'.)

An example that blurs the last two somewhat is the TV show 'Once and Again' 
Wikipedia: One of the show's unique aspects was the interview sequences 
filmed in black and white and interspersed throughout each episode, where the 
characters would reveal their innermost thoughts and memories to the 
camera.(http://tinyurl.com/6pbmfve)
 These 'interviews' had no specified provenance within the diegesis. (There was 
no frame that a doc was being made about these people.) It was more like an 
omniscient narrator had the power to isolate them from their location in 
narrative time and space and solicit their thoughts. But the characters did not 
address their comments to an external AUDIENCE or acknowledge their part in a 
story. They spoke as if they were addressing some sort of sympathetic other who 
might exist in the world of the story, though not involved in the events of the 
story.

___
FrameWorks mailing list
FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks