Re: System crash on vinum start

1999-09-30 Thread Jeffrey J. Mountin

At 03:14 PM 9/28/99 +0930, Greg Lehey wrote:
 And the preferred method is...
 a) /dev/da0
 b) /dev/da0s1
 c) /dev/da0s1e
 (-current and -stable I hope :)

(b) or (c).  (a) isn't a slice.  Note that it won't take slice c,
either.

Thanks for the clarification.  Was recalling a past dicussion on how Vinum
determined what belonged to it .

Not using "c" is just plain common sense.


 It's surprising.  Good software shouldn't panic.  But this input is
 valuable, because now I know where to look.

 Should have spoken up quite a while back.  Figured it was pilot error and
 the panic was a self-inflicted gunshot wound.

Read http://www.lemis.com/vinum/how-to-debug.html.  It's also in
vinum(4).

Again? ;)

May try some old pilot errors and see if I can panic it.  Just need to
recall what I was doing, since it happened when (almost) trying to break
things.

Forgot to mention that software should not panic, but if you are doing
something wrong...

Goes back to recent mention of sanity checking.

You don't want to use vinum read.  Just vinum start.  And I've found
the bug (thanks, Brad).  I'll be committing a fix Real Soon Now.

So then if only the module is loaded and rc does nothing further then doing
a 'vinum read ...' is a Bad Thing.  Use 'start' myself, but just to clarify
for others.


It's still in the pipeline.  I can't give any time frame.  There are
some bugs I need to look at (http://www.lemis.com/vinum/bugs.html),
and then I can start thinking about it.

Perhaps I should have been more specific, but from what I understand there
are some issues with the boot process (space limitations?) and possibly
requiring other changes of a more significant nature beyond that, which you
were waiting for to come about first.


Jeff Mountin - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Systems/Network Administrator
FreeBSD - the power to serve
'86 Yamaha MaxiumX (not FBSD powered)



To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



Re: System crash on vinum start

1999-09-30 Thread Peter Jeremy

On Fri, Oct 01, 1999 at 09:20:53AM +1000, Jeffrey J. Mountin wrote:
At 12:59 PM 9/28/99 +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote:
On Tue, Sep 28, 1999 at 09:11:31AM +1000, Greg Lehey wrote:
  Good software shouldn't panic.
I wish _I_ could convince some people of this :-(.

It can be difficult to consider what a user can do and tends to bloat the
code a bit.  Frustrates my instructors, since it very much a habit when I
script and carried over to C. 8-)

I was thinking of some `production' code (written by a sister company)
that I used to provide customer support for.  It would regularly core
dump (but was automatically restarted).  After a few years they did
manage to fix the core dump, but that exposed a memory leak which they
never did manage to fix (fairly embarrasing in a supposedly
permanently running process).

Speaking of, why is (would) root filesystem support necessary for non
root/swap automagical recovery.

I gather that root support is the most-asked-for feature in Vinum (when
I asked Greg about it some weeks ago, I got about as far as `when will
Vinum' before he answered me).  As long as recovery works, making it
nicer to use is (should be) a lower priority.

Peter
-- 
Peter Jeremy (VK2PJ)[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Alcatel Australia Limited
41 Mandible St  Phone: +61 2 9690 5019
ALEXANDRIA  NSW  2015   Fax:   +61 2 9690 5982


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



Re: System crash on vinum start

1999-09-30 Thread Jeffrey J. Mountin

At 09:44 AM 10/1/99 +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote:
I was thinking of some `production' code (written by a sister company)
that I used to provide customer support for.  It would regularly core
dump (but was automatically restarted).  After a few years they did
manage to fix the core dump, but that exposed a memory leak which they
never did manage to fix (fairly embarrasing in a supposedly
permanently running process).

Eeew!  Can see your point.  Tracking down a sig11 problem in a custom
program right now.  Seems to be OS related, but think a bit of work around
the problem code is in order first.

Oh, the pain of learning.  My first project fixing another's code.  Or at
least trying.  At least it doesn't harm functionality, so has been bugging
me for a while and decided enough is enough.

I gather that root support is the most-asked-for feature in Vinum (when
I asked Greg about it some weeks ago, I got about as far as `when will
Vinum' before he answered me).  As long as recovery works, making it
nicer to use is (should be) a lower priority.

This was more directed torwards Greg, but would guess that auto-recovery
would be fairly requested.  Growing plexes (any type) would be #1 on my
list, auto-recovery #2, and root #3.

Best not to bother him about desired features.  Would be nice for a work
status/todo list, but then *that* has to be updated.  And yet might reduce
questions of the "when will" type.  Rather like the problem page he added.

Otherwise should just stop here now.

duck n cover
"Is it done yet?  Is it done yet?"  8-0


Jeff Mountin - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Systems/Network Administrator
FreeBSD - the power to serve
'86 Yamaha MaxiumX (not FBSD powered)



To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



Re: System crash on vinum start

1999-09-30 Thread Greg Lehey

On Thursday, 30 September 1999 at 18:20:53 -0500, Jeffrey J. Mountin wrote:
 At 12:59 PM 9/28/99 +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote:
 On Tue, Sep 28, 1999 at 09:11:31AM +1000, Greg Lehey wrote:
  Good software shouldn't panic.

 I wish _I_ could convince some people of this :-(.

 It can be difficult to consider what a user can do and tends to bloat the
 code a bit.  Frustrates my instructors, since it very much a habit when I
 script and carried over to C. 8-)

 It's all in the pipeline.  But first we need Vinum on the root file
 system.
 And whilst we're discussing wish-lists...  After several fights with
 Digital/Compaq's Logical Storage Manager, it would be _very_ nice if
 recovery could be done at the physical disk level (ie, "I've just
 replaced da3 - autorecover all vinum volumes that used that disk"),
 rather than having to recover each logical volume.  It would also be
 nice if you could recover mirrored root/swap without needing to
 unmirror and re-mirror them.

 Haven't looked at the code for it, but "hotspare" appeared for the drive
 configuration recently.  Bit a tease really.

 No offense to Greg of course. ;)

This is -CURRENT.  Expect work in progress.  From the commit log:

 replaceobject: Add preliminary code.  This is not yet complete.

 Add keyword 'hotspare'.

 Speaking of, why is (would) root filesystem support necessary for non
 root/swap automagical recovery.  Or will this be part of other
 to-be-implemented functionalities.

I'm not sure I understand the question.  But if I parse it correctly,
the answer is "no".

Greg
--
See complete headers for address, home page and phone numbers
finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] for PGP public key


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



Re: System crash on vinum start

1999-09-30 Thread Jeffrey J. Mountin

At 10:19 AM 10/1/99 +0930, Greg Lehey wrote:
This is -CURRENT.  Expect work in progress.  From the commit log:

 replaceobject: Add preliminary code.  This is not yet complete.

 Add keyword 'hotspare'.

Yessir.  Read -current, track commits, eat my veggies, get a bit of sun
every other week, but am not running -current (for now).  Willing to test
before MFC, however.

 Speaking of, why is (would) root filesystem support necessary for non
 root/swap automagical recovery.  Or will this be part of other
 to-be-implemented functionalities.

I'm not sure I understand the question.  But if I parse it correctly,
the answer is "no".

If you parsed as "auto-recovery || root support", then "Yes, great!"

Thanks,


Jeff Mountin - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Systems/Network Administrator
FreeBSD - the power to serve
'86 Yamaha MaxiumX (not FBSD powered)



To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



Re: System crash on vinum start

1999-09-30 Thread Greg Lehey

On Thursday, 30 September 1999 at 19:37:23 -0500, Jeffrey J. Mountin wrote:
 At 09:44 AM 10/1/99 +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote:
 I was thinking of some `production' code (written by a sister company)
 that I used to provide customer support for.  It would regularly core
 dump (but was automatically restarted).  After a few years they did
 manage to fix the core dump, but that exposed a memory leak which they
 never did manage to fix (fairly embarrasing in a supposedly
 permanently running process).

 Eeew!  Can see your point.  Tracking down a sig11 problem in a custom
 program right now.  Seems to be OS related, but think a bit of work around
 the problem code is in order first.

 Oh, the pain of learning.  My first project fixing another's code.  Or at
 least trying.  At least it doesn't harm functionality, so has been bugging
 me for a while and decided enough is enough.

 I gather that root support is the most-asked-for feature in Vinum (when
 I asked Greg about it some weeks ago, I got about as far as `when will
 Vinum' before he answered me).  As long as recovery works, making it
 nicer to use is (should be) a lower priority.

 This was more directed torwards Greg, but would guess that auto-recovery
 would be fairly requested.  Growing plexes (any type) would be #1 on my
 list, auto-recovery #2, and root #3.

You're not typical.  But you *can* grow concatenated plexes.  You just
can't expand UFS to use the space.  That's not a Vinum issue, but
somebody's working on it.

 Best not to bother him about desired features.  Would be nice for a
 work status/todo list, but then *that* has to be updated.  And yet
 might reduce questions of the "when will" type.  Rather like the
 problem page he added.

That's a good idea, I suppose.  I'll do that.  Done:
http://www.lemis.com/vinum/wishlist.html.

Greg
--
See complete headers for address, home page and phone numbers
finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] for PGP public key


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



Re: System crash on vinum start

1999-09-30 Thread Jeffrey J. Mountin

At 10:57 AM 10/1/99 +0930, Greg Lehey wrote:
You're not typical.  But you *can* grow concatenated plexes.  You just
can't expand UFS to use the space.  That's not a Vinum issue, but
somebody's working on it.

Yes, I realized that and donned a pointy hat.

Root (/) and OS specific files are of interest, but not as critical to me.
There are other allowance one can make for redundancy.  Beyond the scope of
this discussion.

That's a good idea, I suppose.  I'll do that.  Done:
http://www.lemis.com/vinum/wishlist.html.

Excellent!

As for the root issue, #3 looks the most feasible, IMHO, and should
eliminate the problems of #2 if the kernel's fs dies (unless it could try
another drive) and yet would there not be an issue should the drive that
does the bootstrapping die and the system rebooted.  Small thing, not Vinum
related, but at least things would keep going when a mirrored root fs lost
a plex.

The "snapshot" feature is interesting as well.  Guess the logging changes
is not a wish (yet) and is somewhat similar.

Thanks,


Jeff Mountin - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Systems/Network Administrator
FreeBSD - the power to serve
'86 Yamaha MaxiumX (not FBSD powered)



To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



Re: System crash on vinum start

1999-09-30 Thread Greg Lehey

On Thursday, 30 September 1999 at 20:54:39 -0500, Jeffrey J. Mountin wrote:
 At 10:57 AM 10/1/99 +0930, Greg Lehey wrote:
 You're not typical.  But you *can* grow concatenated plexes.  You just
 can't expand UFS to use the space.  That's not a Vinum issue, but
 somebody's working on it.

 Yes, I realized that and donned a pointy hat.

 Root (/) and OS specific files are of interest, but not as critical to me.
 There are other allowance one can make for redundancy.  Beyond the scope of
 this discussion.

 That's a good idea, I suppose.  I'll do that.  Done:
 http://www.lemis.com/vinum/wishlist.html.

 Excellent!

 As for the root issue, #3 looks the most feasible, IMHO, and should
 eliminate the problems of #2 if the kernel's fs dies (unless it could try
 another drive) and yet would there not be an issue should the drive that
 does the bootstrapping die and the system rebooted.

Once we've loaded the kernel, we don't need it again.  You can delete
the kernel on a running system without any problem.

Greg
--
See complete headers for address, home page and phone numbers
finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] for PGP public key


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



Re: System crash on vinum start

1999-09-29 Thread Greg Lehey

On Monday, 27 September 1999 at 13:05:35 -0400, Brad Chisholm wrote:
 I'm having a problem where the "vinum start" command crashes my system.
 This happens regardless of whether it's being issued during bootup via
 /etc/rc or from the command line on a running system.

 Interestingly, however, if I issue the start command from the vinum
 interactive prompt, it works properly with no crash.

 I'm currently running on a snap built this morning (0924), but it was
 also happening on a snap from 0914.

 Crash info, vinum config, and disk info are below.  Let me know if I
 can provide any additional information.

 Yes.  Please read the instructions in vinum(4) about debugging panic
 dumps.

 I found a minor bug in 'vinum start' recently, but I doubt it's
 causing your problem.  I'll commit it Real Soon Now.


 Well, I believe I discovered the source of my problem.  It turns out that
 I did not have the correct devices configured in /dev for the component
 drives.  I had da[0-3]e, but not da[0-3]s1e.  The documentation seemed to
 indicate that the da?s1? devices were not required, but once I made them,
 the crashes stopped.

Thanks.  This was the clue that helped me find the bug.  It's fixed in
3.3-STABLE now.

Greg
--
See complete headers for address, home page and phone numbers
finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] for PGP public key


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



Re: System crash on vinum start

1999-09-28 Thread Rodney W. Grimes

 On Tue, Sep 28, 1999 at 09:11:31AM +1000, Greg Lehey wrote:
   Good software shouldn't panic.
 I wish _I_ could convince some people of this :-(.
 
   Most certainly is.  Could use the functionality to add to a plex's size for
   striped or RAID5, but a bit of planning cures that.  8-)
  
  It's all in the pipeline.  But first we need Vinum on the root file
  system.
 And whilst we're discussing wish-lists...  After several fights with
 Digital/Compaq's Logical Storage Manager, it would be _very_ nice if
 recovery could be done at the physical disk level (ie, "I've just
 replaced da3 - autorecover all vinum volumes that used that disk"),
 rather than having to recover each logical volume.  It would also be
 nice if you could recover mirrored root/swap without needing to
 unmirror and re-mirror them.

Hummm.. this may seem like a really stange question, but I'll throw
it out anyway:

Would $9,000 paid to a developer here with immediate time avaliable
bring FreeBSD 3.x to a state of being able to replace our current use
of hardware raid to do Raid-1 mirroring with hot swap automagic
rebuild capabilities?  (It would need to be production quality code
for very serious business, and completed in 3 weeks time.)

Serious responses only please.

-- 
Rod Grimes - KD7CAX - (RWG25)[EMAIL PROTECTED]


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



Re: System crash on vinum start

1999-09-28 Thread Wilko Bulte

As Rodney W. Grimes wrote ...
  On Tue, Sep 28, 1999 at 09:11:31AM +1000, Greg Lehey wrote:
Good software shouldn't panic.
  I wish _I_ could convince some people of this :-(.

  rather than having to recover each logical volume.  It would also be
  nice if you could recover mirrored root/swap without needing to
  unmirror and re-mirror them.
 
 Hummm.. this may seem like a really stange question, but I'll throw
 it out anyway:
 
 Would $9,000 paid to a developer here with immediate time avaliable
 bring FreeBSD 3.x to a state of being able to replace our current use
 of hardware raid to do Raid-1 mirroring with hot swap automagic
 rebuild capabilities?  (It would need to be production quality code
 for very serious business, and completed in 3 weeks time.)
 
 Serious responses only please.

Rod,

Being in the hardware RAID business myself I cannot help asking: why do you
want to loose the hardware RAID in favor of a software solution? Flexibility
(just guessing) or price maybe?

Wilko
-- 
|   / o / /  _   Arnhem, The Netherlands- Powered by FreeBSD -
|/|/ / / /( (_) BulteWWW  : http://www.tcja.nl  http://www.freebsd.org


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



Re: System crash on vinum start

1999-09-28 Thread Rodney W. Grimes

 As Rodney W. Grimes wrote ...
   On Tue, Sep 28, 1999 at 09:11:31AM +1000, Greg Lehey wrote:
 Good software shouldn't panic.
   I wish _I_ could convince some people of this :-(.
 
   rather than having to recover each logical volume.  It would also be
   nice if you could recover mirrored root/swap without needing to
   unmirror and re-mirror them.
  
  Hummm.. this may seem like a really stange question, but I'll throw
  it out anyway:
  
  Would $9,000 paid to a developer here with immediate time avaliable
  bring FreeBSD 3.x to a state of being able to replace our current use
  of hardware raid to do Raid-1 mirroring with hot swap automagic
  rebuild capabilities?  (It would need to be production quality code
  for very serious business, and completed in 3 weeks time.)
  
  Serious responses only please.
 
 Rod,
 
 Being in the hardware RAID business myself I cannot help asking: why do you
 want to loose the hardware RAID in favor of a software solution? Flexibility
 (just guessing) or price maybe?

Because DPT has screwed this customer over for the last time...


-- 
Rod Grimes - KD7CAX - (RWG25)[EMAIL PROTECTED]


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



Re: System crash on vinum start

1999-09-27 Thread Jeffrey J. Mountin

At 01:05 PM 9/27/99 -0400, Brad Chisholm wrote:
Well, I believe I discovered the source of my problem.  It turns out that 
I did not have the correct devices configured in /dev for the component 
drives.  I had da[0-3]e, but not da[0-3]s1e.  The documentation seemed to
indicate that the da?s1? devices were not required, but once I made them,
the crashes stopped.

Unless it's changed (again) you only need "/dev/da[0-3]" with no slice or
partition.

Not to surprising that it paniced with what appeared to be a "dedicated"
disk (ie da0e).



It's interesting that I could bring the array up using the 'start'
command from the vinum interactive prompt, and things would work
properly with the missing devices, while issuing a direct 'vinum
start' would cause a panic.

Expected behaviour.  From vinum.8:

 If no object names are specified, vinum scans the disks known to
 the system for vinum drives and then reads in the configuration
 as described under the read commands.  The vinum drive contains a
 header with all information about the data stored on the drive,
 including the names of the other drives which are required in
 order to represent plexes and volumes.

Similarly you could list only one drive for the read command in rc.conf and
it should bring up all drives.  Emphasis on the "could" and "should" here.

Doing a "dd if=/dev/da0s1e skip=8 count=6 | tr -d '\000-\011\200-\377'"
would show why, but then you should have seen this if read the section
abover kernel panics. ;)

Even though this may have been a stupid user error, it would be nice
if vinum could catch this without a system crash.  To that end, I'm
including an updated traceback from my panic dump which has the vinum
calls included.

The only time recently that I've seen it panic is when doing something
wrong.  Earlier in the year made pretty much the same mistake you have here.

Thanks for providing such a useful piece of software!

Most certainly is.  Could use the functionality to add to a plex's size for
striped or RAID5, but a bit of planning cures that.  8-)


Jeff Mountin - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Systems/Network Administrator
FreeBSD - the power to serve
'86 Yamaha MaxiumX (not FBSD powered)



To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



Re: System crash on vinum start

1999-09-27 Thread Greg Lehey

On Monday, 27 September 1999 at 15:37:30 -0500, Jeffrey J. Mountin wrote:
 At 01:05 PM 9/27/99 -0400, Brad Chisholm wrote:
 Well, I believe I discovered the source of my problem.  It turns out that
 I did not have the correct devices configured in /dev for the component
 drives.  I had da[0-3]e, but not da[0-3]s1e.  The documentation seemed to
 indicate that the da?s1? devices were not required, but once I made them,
 the crashes stopped.

 Unless it's changed (again) you only need "/dev/da[0-3]" with no slice or
 partition.

It has changed (again).

 Not to surprising that it paniced with what appeared to be a
 "dedicated" disk (ie da0e).

It's surprising.  Good software shouldn't panic.  But this input is
valuable, because now I know where to look.

 It's interesting that I could bring the array up using the 'start'
 command from the vinum interactive prompt, and things would work
 properly with the missing devices, while issuing a direct 'vinum
 start' would cause a panic.

 Expected behaviour.  From vinum.8:

  If no object names are specified, vinum scans the disks known to
  the system for vinum drives and then reads in the configuration
  as described under the read commands.  The vinum drive contains a
  header with all information about the data stored on the drive,
  including the names of the other drives which are required in
  order to represent plexes and volumes.

 Similarly you could list only one drive for the read command in rc.conf and
 it should bring up all drives.  Emphasis on the "could" and "should" here.

I think you're misinterpreting what Brad was saying.  He was issuing
the same command, once during boot and once later.  I've had a number
of reports of this problem, but this is the first one that helps me
find the bug.

 Thanks for providing such a useful piece of software!

 Most certainly is.  Could use the functionality to add to a plex's size for
 striped or RAID5, but a bit of planning cures that.  8-)

It's all in the pipeline.  But first we need Vinum on the root file
system.

Greg
--
See complete headers for address, home page and phone numbers
finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] for PGP public key


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



Re: System crash on vinum start

1999-09-27 Thread Greg Lehey

On Tuesday, 28 September 1999 at 12:59:34 +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote:
 On Tue, Sep 28, 1999 at 09:11:31AM +1000, Greg Lehey wrote:
  Good software shouldn't panic.
 I wish _I_ could convince some people of this :-(.

 Most certainly is.  Could use the functionality to add to a plex's size for
 striped or RAID5, but a bit of planning cures that.  8-)

 It's all in the pipeline.  But first we need Vinum on the root file
 system.
 And whilst we're discussing wish-lists...  After several fights with
 Digital/Compaq's Logical Storage Manager, it would be _very_ nice if
 recovery could be done at the physical disk level (ie, "I've just
 replaced da3 - autorecover all vinum volumes that used that disk"),
 rather than having to recover each logical volume.  It would also be
 nice if you could recover mirrored root/swap without needing to
 unmirror and re-mirror them.

Yup, it's all on the way.  I've just found the second-last bug in
Vinum, so now I'll have time to do that sort of thing :-)

Greg
--
See complete headers for address, home page and phone numbers
finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] for PGP public key


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



Re: System crash on vinum start

1999-09-27 Thread Jeffrey J. Mountin

At 08:41 AM 9/28/99 +0930, Greg Lehey wrote:
It has changed (again).

And the preferred method is...
a) /dev/da0
b) /dev/da0s1
c) /dev/da0s1e
(-current and -stable I hope :)

 Not to surprising that it paniced with what appeared to be a
 "dedicated" disk (ie da0e).

It's surprising.  Good software shouldn't panic.  But this input is
valuable, because now I know where to look.

Should have spoken up quite a while back.  Figured it was pilot error and
the panic was a self-inflicted gunshot wound.

I think you're misinterpreting what Brad was saying.  He was issuing
the same command, once during boot and once later.  I've had a number
of reports of this problem, but this is the first one that helps me
find the bug.

Interpreted as an either/or.  Vinum read followed by a vinum read (or start)?

It's all in the pipeline.  But first we need Vinum on the root file
system.

How is this coming along, been quite a while since anything has discussed
(-current/-stable/-cvs).  Last thing was back in July.


Jeff Mountin - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Systems/Network Administrator
FreeBSD - the power to serve
'86 Yamaha MaxiumX (not FBSD powered)



To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



Re: System crash on vinum start

1999-09-25 Thread Bernd Walter

On Fri, Sep 24, 1999 at 04:36:54PM -0400, Brad Chisholm wrote:
 
 D d0State: up   Device /dev/da0eAvail: 0/17366 MB 
(0%)
 D d1State: up   Device /dev/da1eAvail: 0/17366 MB 
(0%)
 D d2State: up   Device /dev/da2eAvail: 0/17366 MB 
(0%)
 D d3State: up   Device /dev/da3eAvail: 0/17366 MB 
(0%)
 
 da0: 17366MB (35566480 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 2213C)
 da3: 17366MB (35566480 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 2213C)
 da2: 17366MB (35566480 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 2213C)
 da1: 17366MB (35566480 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 2213C)
 
What disk are you booting from?
Does it only happen on start or do you have problems using read too?
I have one host on which I don't use start, because one removeable drive
(SyQuest SQ5200) missbehaves reading while there is no media inserted - but it
does not panic the host - it only was trying to read from it longer than my finger
needed to reach reset...

-- 
B.Walter  COSMO-Project  http://www.cosmo-project.de
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Usergroup[EMAIL PROTECTED]



To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



Re: System crash on vinum start

1999-09-24 Thread Greg Lehey

On Friday, 24 September 1999 at 16:36:54 -0400, Brad Chisholm wrote:
 I'm having a problem where the "vinum start" command crashes my system.
 This happens regardless of whether it's being issued during bootup via
 /etc/rc or from the command line on a running system.

 Interestingly, however, if I issue the start command from the vinum
 interactive prompt, it works properly with no crash.

 I'm currently running on a snap built this morning (0924), but it was
 also happening on a snap from 0914.

 Crash info, vinum config, and disk info are below.  Let me know if I
 can provide any additional information.

Yes.  Please read the instructions in vinum(4) about debugging panic
dumps.

I found a minor bug in 'vinum start' recently, but I doubt it's
causing your problem.  I'll commit it Real Soon Now.

Greg
--
See complete headers for address, home page and phone numbers
finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] for PGP public key


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message