FreeBSD Port: p5-Math-BigInt-1.83
Trying to install amavisd-new from ports in FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE. Installation can't find p5-Math-BigInt and suggests downloading it manually into /usr/ports/distfiles. Even after downloading manually installation still can't find it in /usr/ports/distfiles. Suggestions? Thanks, ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: More speed increases for make-ing ports
Stephen Montgomery-Smith píše v st 23. 05. 2007 v 20:04 -0500:
I'm getting kind of uncomfortable with the patch. I looked some more
in
bsd.gnome.mk and it seems to me that the suggested patch is really
equivalent to the patch enclosed here.
Why did the writer of bsd.gnome.mk have the rather complicated
construction which I am proposing to replace?
I don't know, we'd have to ask Joe Marcus. Here is the revision in
question:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/Mk/bsd.gnome.mk.diff?r1=1.22;r2=1.23
You're basically reverting that revision. Perhaps our make(1) wasn't
smart enough those four years ago, I don't know.
Prostý textový dokument příloha (eee)
--- bsd.gnome.mk-orig Mon Mar 19 23:13:36 2007
+++ bsd.gnome.mk Wed May 23 19:25:19 2007
@@ -689,9 +689,9 @@
# Then traverse through all components, check which of them
# exist in ${_USE_GNOME} and set variables accordingly
+.ifdef _USE_GNOME
. for component in ${_USE_GNOME_ALL}
-_COMP_TEST= ${_USE_GNOME:M${component}}
-. if ${_COMP_TEST:S/${component}//}!=${_COMP_TEST:S/ / /g}
+. if ${_USE_GNOME:M${component}}!=
PATCH_DEPENDS+= ${${component}_PATCH_DEPENDS}
FETCH_DEPENDS+= ${${component}_FETCH_DEPENDS}
EXTRACT_DEPENDS+=${${component}_EXTRACT_DEPENDS}
@@ -725,6 +725,7 @@
. endif
. endfor
+.endif
.endif
.if defined(GNOME_PRE_PATCH)
--
Pav Lucistnik [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Linimon's Rule: The More You Close, The More Will Come
signature.asc
Description: Toto je digitálně podepsaná část zprávy
Re: putty and xorg7.2
From: Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 08:15:23PM +0200, Helmut Schneider wrote: From: Helmut 'Ingrid' Schneider [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 03:03:49PM +0200, Helmut Schneider wrote: I recently upgraded some FBSD6.2 machines to xorg 7.2 according to /usr/ports/UPDATING. By now I cannot use x-forwarding with putty or ssh -X anymore as the DISPLAY paramater is not set anymore. I connect to 2 machines using putty and x-forwarding. Here are the results: See mail to this list with subject ssh X11 forwarding and X.org 7.2 which explains the cause and solution. Hm, I might have missed something, but I created a symlink for /usr/X11R6 - /usr/local and then did a portupgrade -afPP but DISPLAY is still not exported. OK, one has to install xauth. This might/should be a dependency of xorg-libraries. imo. No, because it's not a library :) It's an application and is part of xorg-apps. It never used to be part of xorg-libraries either (it was formerly in xorg-clients), so this was always something you needed to do. Ah, thats the missing link. After the upgrade xorg-clients were gone and not updated to xorg-apps. Thanks, Helmut ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
xorg 7.2 and skype
Hi guys, I have update X.org to 7.2 according to /usr/ports/UPDATING but my skype fails to display any text. It just shows blank boxes instead of characters in both menus and dialog/chat boxes. I`ve tried both skype and skype-devel. Ddo you have any idea how to fix this? Thanks -- PGP KeyID: 0x3118168B Keyserver: pgp.mit.edu Key fingerprint BB50 2983 0714 36DC D02E 158A E03D 56DA 3118 168B pgpCKyxzSiy7Y.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: xorg 7.2 and skype
On Thu, 24 May 2007 10:14:31 +0200 Momchil Ivanov wrote: I have update X.org to 7.2 according to /usr/ports/UPDATING but my skype fails to display any text. It just shows blank boxes instead of characters in both menus and dialog/chat boxes. I`ve tried both skype and skype-devel. Ddo you have any idea how to fix this? Update your ports tree and update x11-fonts/linux-fontconfig (it was fixed yesterday evening). That should help. WBR -- Boris Samorodov (bsam) Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone Internet SP FreeBSD committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: More speed increases for make-ing ports
On 5/24/07, Mark Linimon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 05:34:32PM +0400, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: A seemingly better way may be to make these system vars available in make by default. Doesn't help anyone who runs -RELEASE, so a non-starter. You can go ahead and say that about almost every commit to src. They don't help release-runners immediately, but we're not in a hurry, are we. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problem with Matrox G450 and X.org 7.2
On 2007-May-23 14:51:37 +0200, Hagen Khl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Requesting insufficient memory window!: start: 0xeee0 end: 0xefef size 0x200 (EE) Cannot find empty range to map base to (WW) MGA(0): Video BIOS info block not detected! I have this on my G550 as well (without mga_hal). I haven't fully investigated the cause but I did find a suggestion to upgrade the BIOS. I note that mga_hal 4.4.0 only supports up to X.org 7.0.0 - I'm not sure it it will like 7.2 -- Peter Jeremy pgpK8hKzFzsCT.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Problem with Matrox G450 and X.org 7.2
## Peter Jeremy ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Requesting insufficient memory window!: start: 0xeee0 end: 0xefef size 0x200 (EE) Cannot find empty range to map base to (WW) MGA(0): Video BIOS info block not detected! I have this on my G550 as well (without mga_hal). Same here. I haven't fully investigated the cause but I did find a suggestion to upgrade the BIOS. I note that mga_hal 4.4.0 only supports up to X.org 7.0.0 - I'm not sure it it will like 7.2 It does, if prodded in the right way (start X with -ignoreABI). See my post on x11@ at http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-x11/2007-May/004142.html (it would even easier to find if I didn't wreck the subject). I have no idea if this helps with G400/G450. Regards Christoph -- Spare Space ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Discontinued projects
Le Jeu 24 mai 07 à 12:16:26 +0200, Gabor Tjong A Hung [EMAIL PROTECTED] écrivait : What happens with discontinued projects? They seem to pollute our ports tree. http://tmsnc.sourceforge.net/ seems to indiacte that the project is discontinued. Shouldn't its port be removed from the ports tree then? I've noticed the same with several other ports. http://koti.mbnet.fi/jarmonik/MathPlanner.html aka editors/MathPlanner Well, if they are still usuable, why would we remove them? In the future, they might break for some reason (unfetchable, broken with a new compiler version, not compatible with some dependency, etc.): at this time, let's see if someone take time to fix them; if not, they will be marked as deprecated, and then removed. Regards, -- Th. Thomas. pgpTQBntltYQW.pgp Description: PGP signature
Discontinued projects
What happens with discontinued projects? They seem to pollute our ports tree. http://tmsnc.sourceforge.net/ seems to indiacte that the project is discontinued. Shouldn't its port be removed from the ports tree then? I've noticed the same with several other ports. http://koti.mbnet.fi/jarmonik/MathPlanner.html aka editors/MathPlanner -- Imagination is more important than knowledge. -- A. Einstein ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Discontinued projects
Gabor Tjong A Hung escribió: What happens with discontinued projects? They seem to pollute our ports tree. http://tmsnc.sourceforge.net/ seems to indiacte that the project is discontinued. Shouldn't its port be removed from the ports tree then? I've noticed the same with several other ports. http://koti.mbnet.fi/jarmonik/MathPlanner.html aka editors/MathPlanner As long as they work and seem to useful for people (e.g. I use tmsnc without problems) they should not be removed. Regards, Gabor ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ports/111224: [PATCH] security/pam_per_user conflicts with security/courier-authlib
Synopsis: [PATCH] security/pam_per_user conflicts with security/courier-authlib Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports-freebsd-ports-bugs Responsible-Changed-By: linimon Responsible-Changed-When: Thu May 24 11:15:30 UTC 2007 Responsible-Changed-Why: Fix assignment. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=111224 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/usr/local/ set to 700 ?
With the upgrade of xorg 7.2, and the portupgrade -Rr 'gstreamer*' part, I suddenly find the permissions of my /usr/local and certain directories in there set to 700 instead of 755. Am I the only one with this very interesting issue? Edwin Edwin Groothuis |Personal website: http://www.mavetju.org [EMAIL PROTECTED]| Weblog: http://www.mavetju.org/weblog/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Discontinued projects
On 5/24/07, Thierry Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Le Jeu 24 mai 07 à 12:16:26 +0200, Gabor Tjong A Hung [EMAIL PROTECTED] écrivait: What happens with discontinued projects? They seem to pollute our ports tree. http://tmsnc.sourceforge.net/ seems to indiacte that the project is discontinued. Shouldn't its port be removed from the ports tree then? I've noticed the same with several other ports. http://koti.mbnet.fi/jarmonik/MathPlanner.html aka editors/MathPlanner Well, if they are still usuable, why would we remove them? In the future, they might break for some reason (unfetchable, broken with a new compiler version, not compatible with some dependency, etc.): at this time, let's see if someone take time to fix them; if not, they will be marked as deprecated, and then removed. Moreover, many abandoned projects continue to live in OS-local repositories. Debian have dozens (hundreds?) of such packages, our ports also have some. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: can't startx after xorg upgrade: could not open default font 'fixed'
Quoting Etienne Robillard [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi eculp, Yes -- I'm gettting the same results here on 7.0-CURRENT. I've compiled with gcc 3.4.6 and trying to start /usr/local/bin/X returns a segmentation fault and the message you've described below. I dont know if that could help but maybe you could try recompiling x11-fonts/xorg-fonts and see what it does ? Thanks in advance for letting me know once you've found a proper solution.. :) Hello Etienne, After bringing all 600+ ports on this workstation up to date taking advantage of the -P option to portupgrade, I was still getting the same message so I bit the bullet and reran portupgrade -rRfpy x11/xorg and maybe 12 hours later, Xorg all works beautifully plus I have local packages for upgrading my other machines. I should have probably done that from the beginning but who knows, I'm vert happy and 7.2 and the localbase change, xorg 7.2 seems to have much better drivers. Thanks to all who made this very very complex upgrade possible. Considering the more than 200 ports that were rebuilt with portupgrade -rRfpy x11/xorg with no errors, it is pretty remarkable. THANKS. ed Kind regards, Etienne --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I get: Fatal server error: could not open default font 'fixed' I have looked at: XFree86-4-fontDefaultBitmaps is not used with xorg x11-fonts/font-alias is installed xorg-fonts-miscbitmaps is installed thinking that it might sub the Default I have checked font.conf for correct path. Found a thread on Google but didn't find the solution. xorgcfg gives the same error /etc/X11/xorg.conf Font Path is set to /usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/ I upgraded with portupgrade -a -P so I guess I could go back and recompile all but first I would like to know if anyone else has seen this after the update and how they fixed it. Something dumb I'm doing I'm sure :( Thanks, ed ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Etienne Robillard 7680 de jouvence, La Plaine J7M-2K9, Québec Telephone: 450-478-5026 Yahoo Messenger ID: granted14 Skype ID: incidah Ask a question on any topic and get answers from real people. Go to Yahoo! Answers and share what you know at http://ca.answers.yahoo.com ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: More speed increases for make-ing ports
Pav Lucistnik wrote:
Stephen Montgomery-Smith píše v st 23. 05. 2007 v 20:04 -0500:
I'm getting kind of uncomfortable with the patch. I looked some more
in
bsd.gnome.mk and it seems to me that the suggested patch is really
equivalent to the patch enclosed here.
Why did the writer of bsd.gnome.mk have the rather complicated
construction which I am proposing to replace?
I don't know, we'd have to ask Joe Marcus. Here is the revision in
question:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/Mk/bsd.gnome.mk.diff?r1=1.22;r2=1.23
You're basically reverting that revision. Perhaps our make(1) wasn't
smart enough those four years ago, I don't know.
I'm not really reverting that revision. As it was prior to that
revision, I can see it not working under many circumstances. Namely, if
${component} appears more than once in ${_USE_GNOME} - something that
will happen frequently - the test will not work.
My revision seems the obvious way to do it to me, but I can see that if
someone was working with what Joe was working with, that one could be
lead to think up his revision. I know that I myself have missed the
obvious in many circumstance.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problem with Matrox G450 and X.org 7.2
On Thu, 24 May 2007 12:03:26 +0200 Christoph Moench-Tegeder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It does, if prodded in the right way (start X with -ignoreABI). See my post on x11@ at http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-x11/2007-May/004142.html (it would even easier to find if I didn't wreck the subject). I have no idea if this helps with G400/G450. Thank you! I'm very happy to say - it works. :) Hagen -- Scientia est potentia! PGP-Key-ID: 0x53C6010D PGP-Fingerprint: 428D 7819 B332 3FEC F5BA 5C0B 2B62 1207 53C6 010D signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: More speed increases for make-ing ports
Pav Lucistnik wrote:
Stephen Montgomery-Smith píše v čt 24. 05. 2007 v 07:35 -0500:
Pav Lucistnik wrote:
Stephen Montgomery-Smith píše v st 23. 05. 2007 v 20:04 -0500:
I'm getting kind of uncomfortable with the patch. I looked some more
in
bsd.gnome.mk and it seems to me that the suggested patch is really
equivalent to the patch enclosed here.
Why did the writer of bsd.gnome.mk have the rather complicated
construction which I am proposing to replace?
I don't know, we'd have to ask Joe Marcus. Here is the revision in
question:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/Mk/bsd.gnome.mk.diff?r1=1.22;r2=1.23
You're basically reverting that revision. Perhaps our make(1) wasn't
smart enough those four years ago, I don't know.
I'm not really reverting that revision. As it was prior to that
revision, I can see it not working under many circumstances. Namely, if
${component} appears more than once in ${_USE_GNOME} - something that
will happen frequently - the test will not work.
My revision seems the obvious way to do it to me, but I can see that if
someone was working with what Joe was working with, that one could be
lead to think up his revision. I know that I myself have missed the
obvious in many circumstance.
Please send me the patch again, as an attachment, I'll give it some
workout :)
Here it is.
--- bsd.gnome.mk-orig Mon Mar 19 23:13:36 2007
+++ bsd.gnome.mkWed May 23 19:25:19 2007
@@ -689,9 +689,9 @@
# Then traverse through all components, check which of them
# exist in ${_USE_GNOME} and set variables accordingly
+.ifdef _USE_GNOME
. for component in ${_USE_GNOME_ALL}
-_COMP_TEST=${_USE_GNOME:M${component}}
-. if ${_COMP_TEST:S/${component}//}!=${_COMP_TEST:S/ / /g}
+. if ${_USE_GNOME:M${component}}!=
PATCH_DEPENDS+=${${component}_PATCH_DEPENDS}
FETCH_DEPENDS+=${${component}_FETCH_DEPENDS}
EXTRACT_DEPENDS+=${${component}_EXTRACT_DEPENDS}
@@ -725,6 +725,7 @@
. endif
. endfor
+.endif
.endif
.if defined(GNOME_PRE_PATCH)
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: can't startx after xorg upgrade: could not open default font 'fixed'
Nice. Which GCC version did you used for compiling all theses ports ? I don't get anymore a segfault but still gets that fatal error message about the missing font 'fixed'... It looks like the /usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/misc path gets ignored by the fc-cache utility, even after having upgraded the x11-fonts/xorg-fonts-miscbitmaps port, which is kinda odd btw. Anyway, I guess thats my problem since I've not bothered following the steps in mergebase.sh nor did I've used the xorg metaport. The funny thing about this 7.2 upgrade quest is that I didnt even plan to go into it :) Cheers, Etienne --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Etienne, After bringing all 600+ ports on this workstation up to date taking advantage of the -P option to portupgrade, I was still getting the same message so I bit the bullet and reran portupgrade -rRfpy x11/xorg and maybe 12 hours later, Xorg all works beautifully plus I have local packages for upgrading my other machines. I should have probably done that from the beginning but who knows, I'm vert happy and 7.2 and the localbase change, xorg 7.2 seems to have much better drivers. Thanks to all who made this very very complex upgrade possible. Considering the more than 200 ports that were rebuilt with portupgrade -rRfpy x11/xorg with no errors, it is pretty remarkable. THANKS. ed Kind regards, Etienne --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I get: Fatal server error: could not open default font 'fixed' I have looked at: XFree86-4-fontDefaultBitmaps is not used with xorg x11-fonts/font-alias is installed xorg-fonts-miscbitmaps is installed thinking that it might sub the Default I have checked font.conf for correct path. Found a thread on Google but didn't find the solution. xorgcfg gives the same error /etc/X11/xorg.conf Font Path is set to /usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/ I upgraded with portupgrade -a -P so I guess I could go back and recompile all but first I would like to know if anyone else has seen this after the update and how they fixed it. Something dumb I'm doing I'm sure :( Thanks, ed ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Etienne Robillard 7680 de jouvence, La Plaine J7M-2K9, Québec Telephone: 450-478-5026 Yahoo Messenger ID: granted14 Skype ID: incidah Ask a question on any topic and get answers from real people. Go to Yahoo! Answers and share what you know at http://ca.answers.yahoo.com ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Etienne Robillard 7680 de jouvence, La Plaine J7M-2K9, Québec Telephone: 450-478-5026 Yahoo Messenger ID: granted14 Skype ID: incidah Be smarter than spam. See how smart SpamGuard is at giving junk email the boot with the All-new Yahoo! Mail at http://mrd.mail.yahoo.com/try_beta?.intl=ca ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: More speed increases for make-ing ports
Stephen Montgomery-Smith píše v čt 24. 05. 2007 v 07:35 -0500:
Pav Lucistnik wrote:
Stephen Montgomery-Smith píše v st 23. 05. 2007 v 20:04 -0500:
I'm getting kind of uncomfortable with the patch. I looked some more
in
bsd.gnome.mk and it seems to me that the suggested patch is really
equivalent to the patch enclosed here.
Why did the writer of bsd.gnome.mk have the rather complicated
construction which I am proposing to replace?
I don't know, we'd have to ask Joe Marcus. Here is the revision in
question:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/Mk/bsd.gnome.mk.diff?r1=1.22;r2=1.23
You're basically reverting that revision. Perhaps our make(1) wasn't
smart enough those four years ago, I don't know.
I'm not really reverting that revision. As it was prior to that
revision, I can see it not working under many circumstances. Namely, if
${component} appears more than once in ${_USE_GNOME} - something that
will happen frequently - the test will not work.
My revision seems the obvious way to do it to me, but I can see that if
someone was working with what Joe was working with, that one could be
lead to think up his revision. I know that I myself have missed the
obvious in many circumstance.
Please send me the patch again, as an attachment, I'll give it some
workout :)
--
Pav Lucistnik [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
EMACS: Eight Megabytes And Continually Swapping
signature.asc
Description: Toto je digitálně podepsaná část zprávy
FreeBSD Port: p5-Math-BigInt-1.83
Neil Robins writes: Trying to install amavisd-new from ports in FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE. Installation can't find p5-Math-BigInt and suggests downloading it manually into /usr/ports/distfiles. Even after downloading manually installation still can't find it in /usr/ports/distfiles. Suggestions? I'm having the same issue. Investigating a little reveals the size as listed in distinfo as 190172 and the size of the downloaded tarball as ~7200. Someone's confused. Robert Huff ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: More speed increases for make-ing ports
Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
Pav Lucistnik wrote:
Stephen Montgomery-Smith píše v čt 24. 05. 2007 v 07:35 -0500:
Pav Lucistnik wrote:
Stephen Montgomery-Smith píše v st 23. 05. 2007 v 20:04 -0500:
I'm getting kind of uncomfortable with the patch. I looked some more
in bsd.gnome.mk and it seems to me that the suggested patch is
really equivalent to the patch enclosed here.
Why did the writer of bsd.gnome.mk have the rather complicated
construction which I am proposing to replace?
I don't know, we'd have to ask Joe Marcus. Here is the revision in
question:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/Mk/bsd.gnome.mk.diff?r1=1.22;r2=1.23
You're basically reverting that revision. Perhaps our make(1) wasn't
smart enough those four years ago, I don't know.
I'm not really reverting that revision. As it was prior to that
revision, I can see it not working under many circumstances. Namely,
if ${component} appears more than once in ${_USE_GNOME} - something
that will happen frequently - the test will not work.
My revision seems the obvious way to do it to me, but I can see that
if someone was working with what Joe was working with, that one could
be lead to think up his revision. I know that I myself have missed
the obvious in many circumstance.
Please send me the patch again, as an attachment, I'll give it some
workout :)
Here it is.
And one more thing - I found the same construction in bsd.python.mk.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FreeBSD Port: p5-Math-BigInt-1.83
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 09:21:09AM -0400, Robert Huff wrote: I'm having the same issue. Investigating a little reveals the size as listed in distinfo as 190172 and the size of the downloaded tarball as ~7200. Generally mismatches like this are returning HTML pages instead of the desired binary. mcl ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: More speed increases for make-ing ports
Stephen Montgomery-Smith píše v čt 24. 05. 2007 v 07:55 -0500: Please send me the patch again, as an attachment, I'll give it some workout :) Here it is. Without patch: real12m28.513s user12m30.657s sys 4m6.943s With patch: real12m3.077s user11m48.727s sys 4m8.407s That's from 996s to 956s - about same speed up as the unique patch. I like it. -- Pav Lucistnik [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] A computer programmer is a device for turning requirements into undocumented features. It runs on cola, pizza and Dilbert cartoons. -- Bram Moolenaar signature.asc Description: Toto je digitálně podepsaná část zprávy
FreeBSD Port: cacti-0.8.6j.3_2
=== Vulnerability check disabled, database not found === Found saved configuration for cacti-0.8.6j.3_2 = cacti-0.8.6j.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/. = Attempting to fetch from http://www.cacti.net/downloads/. cacti-0.8.6j.tar.gz 100% of 1099 kB 212 kBps = cacti-plugin-arch.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/. = Attempting to fetch from http://cactiusers.net/downloads/plugins/. fetch: http://cactiusers.net/downloads/plugins/cacti-plugin-arch.tar.gz: No address record = Attempting to fetch from ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/. fetch: ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/cacti-plugin-arch.tar.gz: File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) = Couldn't fetch it - please try to retrieve this = port manually into /usr/ports/distfiles/ and try again. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/net/cacti. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/net/cacti. I found on the site only http://cactiusers.org/downloads/patches/ only gzip or zip, not tar.gz as download. What is wrong? greetings -- Der GMX SmartSurfer hilft bis zu 70% Ihrer Onlinekosten zu sparen! Ideal für Modem und ISDN: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/smartsurfer ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FreeBSD Port: p5-Math-BigInt-1.83
Mark Linimon writes: On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 09:21:09AM -0400, Robert Huff wrote: I'm having the same issue. Investigating a little reveals the size as listed in distinfo as 190172 and the size of the downloaded tarball as ~7200. Generally mismatches like this are returning HTML pages instead of the desired binary. You're right. Robert Huff ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: can't startx after xorg upgrade: could not open default font 'fixed'
Etienne Robillard wrote: Nice. Which GCC version did you used for compiling all theses ports ? I don't get anymore a segfault but still gets that fatal error message about the missing font 'fixed'... It looks like the /usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/misc path gets ignored by the fc-cache utility, even after having upgraded the x11-fonts/xorg-fonts-miscbitmaps port, which is kinda odd btw. Reinstall (portupgrade -f) at least font-misc-misc and font-cursor-misc. See http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2007-May/035305.html Dejan ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
USE_LDCONFIG linux ports
Careful about using USE_LDCONFIG with linux ports. With the current ports infrastructure you may wind up running ldconfig on the native ldconfig database (i.e., without -r /compat/linux). As an example, try replacing INSTALLS_SHLIB=yes with USE_LDCONFIG=yes in x11/linux-xorg-libs/Makefile. Then run make install. It will do this: . . === Running ldconfig /sbin/ldconfig -m /compat/linux/lib . . (note the lack of '-r /compat/linux') If you try it, I recommend you do this in a chroot, just in case ;). The root of the cause is that the old way (INSTALLS_SHLIB) uses LDCONFIG_CMD. The new way (USE_LDCONFIG) uses LDCONFIG. Having USE_LINUX_PREFIX causes bsd.port.mk to add -r /compat/linux to LDCONFIG_CMD (and not LDCONFIG). I don't have a patch at the moment, but I would probably start by trying to use LDCONFIG instead of LDCONFIG_CMD in the USE_LINUX stuff in bsd.port.mk. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: More speed increases for make-ing ports
On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 07:35 -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
Pav Lucistnik wrote:
Stephen Montgomery-Smith píše v st 23. 05. 2007 v 20:04 -0500:
I'm getting kind of uncomfortable with the patch. I looked some more
in
bsd.gnome.mk and it seems to me that the suggested patch is really
equivalent to the patch enclosed here.
Why did the writer of bsd.gnome.mk have the rather complicated
construction which I am proposing to replace?
I don't know, we'd have to ask Joe Marcus. Here is the revision in
question:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/Mk/bsd.gnome.mk.diff?r1=1.22;r2=1.23
You're basically reverting that revision. Perhaps our make(1) wasn't
smart enough those four years ago, I don't know.
I'm not really reverting that revision. As it was prior to that
revision, I can see it not working under many circumstances. Namely, if
${component} appears more than once in ${_USE_GNOME} - something that
will happen frequently - the test will not work.
My revision seems the obvious way to do it to me, but I can see that if
someone was working with what Joe was working with, that one could be
lead to think up his revision. I know that I myself have missed the
obvious in many circumstance.
I believe this will work, but it's been so long since I did this work.
I think the problem was that :M used to match eel when USE_GNOME
contained eel2. But that doesn't appear to be the case anymore.
Joe
--
PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Problem with Matrox G450 and X.org 7.2
On Thu, 24 May 2007 12:30:57 -0400 Robert Huff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: With a G400, on 6.2 updated to yesterday, and xorg-7.2 (also yesterday, with no previous 6.9), and a just-installed mga_hal, I still get: (EE) Cannot find empty range to map base to and (WW) MGA(0): Video BIOS info block not detected! I still get these messages too, but now II get a screen and I can live with that. Hagen -- Scientia est potentia! PGP-Key-ID: 0x53C6010D PGP-Fingerprint: 428D 7819 B332 3FEC F5BA 5C0B 2B62 1207 53C6 010D signature.asc Description: PGP signature
udefined reference to 'XDamageAdd' in mesa-demos while compiling
Hello All, When I compile mesa-demos port I get the following: === Building for mesa-demos-6.5.3_1 gmake[1]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/graphics/mesa-demos/work/Mesa-6.5.3/progs/demos' cc -I../../include -fPIC -pedantic -I/usr/local/include -DUSE_XSHM -DHZ=100 -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe arbfplight.c readtex.o -L/usr/local/lib -lglut -lGLU -lGL -lXext -lXmu -lXi -lX11 -lm -o arbfplight arbfplight.c: In function `Init': arbfplight.c:238: warning: string length `934' is greater than the length `509' ISO C89 compilers are required to support arbfplight.c:264: warning: string length `729' is greater than the length `509' ISO C89 compilers are required to support /usr/local/lib/libGL.so: undefined reference to `XDamageAdd' gmake[1]: *** [arbfplight] Error 1 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/graphics/mesa-demos/work/Mesa-6.5.3/progs/demos' gmake: *** [default] Error 1 *** Error code 2 Anyone have any ideas what might be causing this. I apparently am having problems with my GL libraries and I would like to find out what is causing it. As far as I can tell all of my GL libraries are up to date. Any help would be greatly appreciated! Thanks, Christopher ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
remaining traces of X11R6?
With a ports tree supped to about 11:00 local, I get this: huff# grep -r /usr/X11R6 /usr/ports/x11* | wc -l 270 I take it there's a reason for all of these? A lot of them seem to be in pkg_message, but still ... Robert Huff ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: py24-wmgeneral-0.1_1
On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 11:26:51PM +0200, Mario Frasca wrote: since something like a year or so I've taken over the project pywmdockapps, previously by Kristoffer Erlandsson. the main web site has changed: it's now hosted on sourceforge. http://pywmdockapps.sourceforge.net I actually rolled a port of the new version last week, not realizing it was a renamed project. It's ready to be put in after the ports freeze ends. I've recently added some more functionality... I'm using it in a few small dockapps, very compact and quite useful. the 'long description' should be corrected, shall I write down an updated version? Certainly, feel free to send one along. Thanks, David ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: More speed increases for make-ing ports
Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 07:35 -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
Pav Lucistnik wrote:
Stephen Montgomery-Smith píše v st 23. 05. 2007 v 20:04 -0500:
I'm getting kind of uncomfortable with the patch. I looked some more
in
bsd.gnome.mk and it seems to me that the suggested patch is really
equivalent to the patch enclosed here.
Why did the writer of bsd.gnome.mk have the rather complicated
construction which I am proposing to replace?
I don't know, we'd have to ask Joe Marcus. Here is the revision in
question:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/Mk/bsd.gnome.mk.diff?r1=1.22;r2=1.23
You're basically reverting that revision. Perhaps our make(1) wasn't
smart enough those four years ago, I don't know.
I'm not really reverting that revision. As it was prior to that
revision, I can see it not working under many circumstances. Namely, if
${component} appears more than once in ${_USE_GNOME} - something that
will happen frequently - the test will not work.
My revision seems the obvious way to do it to me, but I can see that if
someone was working with what Joe was working with, that one could be
lead to think up his revision. I know that I myself have missed the
obvious in many circumstance.
I believe this will work, but it's been so long since I did this work.
I think the problem was that :M used to match eel when USE_GNOME
contained eel2. But that doesn't appear to be the case anymore.
That makes perfect sense. It does look like you had to work around a
bug in make. I have actually looked at the code in make where it does
the :M (it is the function Str_Match is str.c) and this bug has clearly
been fixed now.
Stephen
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
email addresses and spam
All right, who released my email address to spammers? I send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and 2 weeks later I get spam. That is not cool, people. You MUST make sure that never happens. Now I have to blacklist this address. Sheesh. Reply-To: Duke Cole [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Duke Cole [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en-US) AppleWebKit/103u (KHTML, like Gecko) Safa$ X-Accept-Language: en-us To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Dear Sir/Madam, My name is KELVIN JOOP . I am the sale manegar of DUKE COLE TEXTILES AND FABRICS COMPANY IN THE UK Presently, our company is looking for a trustworthy bookkeeper, representative in Canada/USA. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: email addresses and spam
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 12:02:39PM -0700, Walter Ian Kaye wrote: All right, who released my email address to spammers? The mailing lists are public and mirrored all over the world. It's too late for that address, sorry. mcl ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: email addresses and spam
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 12:02:39PM -0700, Walter Ian Kaye wrote: All right, who released my email address to spammers? I send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and 2 weeks later I get spam. That is not cool, people. You MUST make sure that never happens. Now I have to blacklist this address. Sheesh. When you post to a public mailing list you should accept that your address will be made public. The archives of this list are available on freebsd.org and many other sites. Those archives can easily be found by anything crawling the web. Tim. Reply-To: Duke Cole [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Duke Cole [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en-US) AppleWebKit/103u (KHTML, like Gecko) Safa$ X-Accept-Language: en-us To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Dear Sir/Madam, My name is KELVIN JOOP . I am the sale manegar of DUKE COLE TEXTILES AND FABRICS COMPANY IN THE UK Presently, our company is looking for a trustworthy bookkeeper, representative in Canada/USA. -- Tim Bishop http://www.bishnet.net/tim/ PGP Key: 0x5AE7D984 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: email addresses and spam
On May 24, 2007, at 12:02 PM, Walter Ian Kaye wrote: All right, who released my email address to spammers? Nobody. Spammers routinely search for email addresses by scraping Google, websites, mailing list archives, and even word-list dictionaries or random number generators. I send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and 2 weeks later I get spam. That is not cool, people. You MUST make sure that never happens. Now I have to blacklist this address. Sheesh. Welcome to the Internet, as (presumably!) you are new here. The FreeBSD postmaster already spends a lot of resources to try to keep these mailing lists (mostly) spam-free, but there's nothing that we can do to prevent a spammer from sending email to you after you've chosen to make your email address available by sending mail to a public list, and this is going to be true of other mailing lists elsewhere, web forums, Usenet, and so forth. Most people deal with spam by setting up some combination of MTA checking, greylisting, and spam-filtering via Amavis/SpamAssassin/ dspam/ClamAV/etc rather than creating new email addresses, but you can do as you see fit. -- -Chuck ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: email addresses and spam
On 2007-May-24 12:02:39 -0700, Walter Ian Kaye [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: All right, who released my email address to spammers? My guess is that you did. I send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and 2 weeks later I get spam. That is not cool, people. You MUST make sure that never happens. Now I have to blacklist this address. Sheesh. I'm not sure where you have been living all your life but junk mail is a part of being on the internet. I think you need to change your attitude or you'll be winding up in lots of blacklists. Anyone can subscribe to most of the FreeBSD mailing lists. Once they have subscribed, they will receive copies of all the traffic on the list - this includes whatever addresses posters have included in their messages. The project can't accept responsibility for what list subscribers so with the information they receive. It is up to you to protect your e-mail using whatever anti-spam measures you like. -- Peter Jeremy pgpup2kKHRa1W.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: email addresses and spam
Walter Ian Kaye [EMAIL PROTECTED]: All right, who released my email address to spammers? This is a publicly available list (see lists.freebsd.org), so its likely they grab the mail from it directly (or even read this list as well). I send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and 2 weeks later I get spam. That is not cool, people. You MUST make sure that never happens. Why MUST that be made sure? Regards Marcus ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: remaining traces of X11R6?
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 01:03:00PM -0400, Robert Huff wrote: With a ports tree supped to about 11:00 local, I get this: huff# grep -r /usr/X11R6 /usr/ports/x11* | wc -l 270 I take it there's a reason for all of these? Yes: They have not yet been changed. Feel free to work with the maintainers to fix these. Kris ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: email addresses and spam
At 12:20 p -0700 05/24/2007, Chuck Swiger didst inscribe upon an electronic papyrus: On May 24, 2007, at 12:02 PM, Walter Ian Kaye wrote: All right, who released my email address to spammers? Nobody. Spammers routinely search for email addresses by scraping Google, websites, mailing list archives, and even word-list dictionaries or random number generators. I send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and 2 weeks later I get spam. That is not cool, people. You MUST make sure that never happens. Now I have to blacklist this address. Sheesh. Welcome to the Internet, as (presumably!) you are new here. Hardly new. Been here for 15 years. The FreeBSD postmaster already spends a lot of resources to try to keep these mailing lists (mostly) spam-free, but there's nothing that we can do to prevent a spammer from sending email to you after you've chosen to make your email address available by sending mail to a public list, and this is going to be true of other mailing lists elsewhere, web forums, Usenet, and so forth. I had NO idea this was a public list. I THOUGHT it was a private distribution to the ports people. Now you (all) understand my surprise. Most people deal with spam by setting up some combination of MTA checking, greylisting, and spam-filtering via Amavis/SpamAssassin/ dspam/ClamAV/etc rather than creating new email addresses, but you can do as you see fit. I do both. In fact, I wrote my own spam filter in Perl, and it deletes 95% of the email which arrives, catching 99% of the spam. I had *whitelisted* this special recipient address to ensure I got the mail I wanted, but now I see I cannot keep it whitelisted, or else it will be whitelisting spam as well. :/ Perhaps I can conditionally whitelist it if [EMAIL PROTECTED] is one of the recipients. Maybe that's the best setup. So now that everything's clear (I hope), let's put this thread to rest. Thank you. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problem with net/ttt
Has anyone seen this? net_read.c: In function `open_pf': net_read.c:1164: error: `BIOCGBLEN' undeclared (first use in this function) net_read.c:1164: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once net_read.c:1164: error: for each function it appears in.) *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/net/ttt/work/ttt-1.8.2. *** Error code 1 -- Paul Schmehl ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Senior Information Security Analyst The University of Texas at Dallas http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/
Ports tree has been unfrozen
The ports tree is now fully open for commits now most of the Xorg fallout has been fixed. There are still a few oustanding issues and a lot of users are still in the progress of upgrading, so please be gently with major changes that might conflict with those upgrades. We thank everybody for bearing with us. The Xorg upgrade was a major change in our tree that affects nearly each and every one of our users, so we chose the safe path even though this would cause issues in other places. A big thanks to all that helped prepare the upgrade, especially Florent Thoumie and Dejan Lesjak, without them it wouldn't have been as painless as it was. Enjoy the brave new world of X.org X11R7.2! -erwin - Forwarded message from Erwin Lansing [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 22:08:51 + (UTC) From: Erwin Lansing [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: cvs commit: CVSROOT approvers erwin 2007-05-24 22:08:51 UTC FreeBSD ports repository Modified files: .approvers Log: Open up the tree after the Xorg upgrade. Revision ChangesPath 1.15 +1 -1 CVSROOT/approvers http://cvsweb.FreeBSD.org/CVSROOT/approvers.diff?r1=1.14r2=1.15f=h | fetch http://cvsweb.FreeBSD.org/CVSROOT/approvers.diff?r1=1.14r2=1.15 failed - End forwarded message - -- Erwin Lansing http://droso.org Security is like an onion. (o_ _o) It's made up of several layers \\\_\ /_///[EMAIL PROTECTED] And it makes you cry.) ([EMAIL PROTECTED] pgpyPEw4zgs41.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Problem with Matrox G450 and X.org 7.2
## Robert Huff ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): This is not working for me. (Which may not be a problem with the driver, but I'd like to eliminate that possibility first) With a G400, on 6.2 updated to yesterday, and xorg-7.2 (also yesterday, with no previous 6.9), and a just-installed mga_hal, I still get: Looking at your log, I see you are not using the Matrox drivers; they would report as follows: (II) Loading /usr/local/lib/xorg/modules/drivers//mga_drv.so (II) Module mga: vendor=Matrox Graphics Inc. - x86_32 - Release v4.4.0 compiled for 7.0.0, module version = 1.2.1 Module class: X.Org Video Driver ABI class: X.Org Video Driver, version 0.8 Make sure mga_drv.so and mga_hal_drv.so from the matrox drivers are installed in /usr/local/lib/xorg/modules/drivers (backup your old xorg mga_drv.so) and give the autoconfiguration a try (X -configure), it worked fine for me. See here: (II) Loading /usr/local/lib/xorg/modules/drivers//mga_drv.so (II) Module mga: vendor=X.Org Foundation compiled for 7.2.0, module version = 1.4.6 Module class: X.Org Video Driver ABI class: X.Org Video Driver, version 1.1 Requesting insufficient memory window!: start: 0xf300 end: 0xf3ff size 0x200 (EE) Cannot find empty range to map base to (WW) MGA(0): Video BIOS info block not detected! I have these errors, too, but they are not fatal (at least I didn't notice anything fatal). Regards Christoph -- Spare Space ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: udefined reference to 'XDamageAdd' in mesa-demos while compiling
Hello, - Christopher Prance [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello All, When I compile mesa-demos port I get the following: I don't remember if I had exactly the same problem, but do you have nvidia-drivers installed ? I had, and found that it has to be uninstalled before mesa-demos can compile. So, if you have nvidia-driver, you must remove it, install mesa-demos, and reinstall nvidia-driver. Else, what do you have if you try to compile mesa-demos after a portupgrade -f libGL ? Olivier === Building for mesa-demos-6.5.3_1 gmake[1]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/graphics/mesa-demos/work/Mesa-6.5.3/progs/demos' cc -I../../include -fPIC -pedantic -I/usr/local/include -DUSE_XSHM -DHZ=100 -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe arbfplight.c readtex.o -L/usr/local/lib -lglut -lGLU -lGL -lXext -lXmu -lXi -lX11 -lm -o arbfplight arbfplight.c: In function `Init': arbfplight.c:238: warning: string length `934' is greater than the length `509' ISO C89 compilers are required to support arbfplight.c:264: warning: string length `729' is greater than the length `509' ISO C89 compilers are required to support /usr/local/lib/libGL.so: undefined reference to `XDamageAdd' gmake[1]: *** [arbfplight] Error 1 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/graphics/mesa-demos/work/Mesa-6.5.3/progs/demos' gmake: *** [default] Error 1 *** Error code 2 Anyone have any ideas what might be causing this. I apparently am having problems with my GL libraries and I would like to find out what is causing it. As far as I can tell all of my GL libraries are up to date. Any help would be greatly appreciated! Thanks, Christopher ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-x11 To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Olivier Smedts _ ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]- against HTML email vCards X www: http://www.gid0.org- against proprietary attachments / \ Il y a seulement 10 sortes de gens dans le monde : ceux qui comprennent le binaire, et ceux qui ne le comprennent pas. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Ports tree has been unfrozen
Pat on the back to everyone involved, progression is good ! Hip Hip Erwin Lansing wrote: The ports tree is now fully open for commits now most of the Xorg fallout has been fixed. There are still a few oustanding issues and a lot of users are still in the progress of upgrading, so please be gently with major changes that might conflict with those upgrades. We thank everybody for bearing with us. The Xorg upgrade was a major change in our tree that affects nearly each and every one of our users, so we chose the safe path even though this would cause issues in other places. A big thanks to all that helped prepare the upgrade, especially Florent Thoumie and Dejan Lesjak, without them it wouldn't have been as painless as it was. Enjoy the brave new world of X.org X11R7.2! -erwin - Forwarded message from Erwin Lansing [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 22:08:51 + (UTC) From: Erwin Lansing [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: cvs commit: CVSROOT approvers erwin 2007-05-24 22:08:51 UTC FreeBSD ports repository Modified files: .approvers Log: Open up the tree after the Xorg upgrade. Revision ChangesPath 1.15 +1 -1 CVSROOT/approvers http://cvsweb.FreeBSD.org/CVSROOT/approvers.diff?r1=1.14r2=1.15f=h | fetch http://cvsweb.FreeBSD.org/CVSROOT/approvers.diff?r1=1.14r2=1.15 failed - End forwarded message - This email has been handled by lerwick.hopto.org mail server and has been scanned by 3 virus killers and spamassassin ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
HEADSUP: default for ports/Makefile 'make update' is changing
If you use 'make update', the default method is going to become portsnap. Currently, if you do not define one of the Makevars PORTSNAP_UPDATE, SUP_UPDATE, or CVS_UPDATE first, the code just complains at you and does nothing. This is one less thing that has to be set by default by an administrator. More advanced users can still set SUP_UPDATE or CVS_UPDATE, but if none of these is set, portsnap is assumed. This deprecates PORTSNAP_UPDATE. mcl ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[HEADS UP] Re: setting gcc42 as default compiler
From: Maho NAKATA [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: setting gcc42 as default compiler Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 09:52:18 +0900 (JST) Hi, As 7-CURRENT is going to ship with gcc42, I'd like to switch the default compiler for OOo ports to gcc42, too. General * depending on gcc-ooo which is specific/patched version is evil. also useless for other than ooo2 ports. * some people might also use gfortran as well, in this case we install gcc42 too and no additional compilers are needed. * facilitation for gcc part of Makefile. we do not need to consider about gcc-ooo (i386) and gcc41 part(amd64/gcj build), but single gcc42 part is enough. For 7-CURRENT * No additional compiler will be needed for both FreeBSD i386/amd64. For 6-STABLE * Just moving to one single compiler gcc42 is enough. Drawbacks * Sometimes we need additional gcc42 patches for OOo. Issues * gcc42-withgcjawt conflicts with gcc42 :( but I have an idea... Currently just i wrote this proposal. Any suggestions/comments are extremely appreciated. All the best, -- Nakata Maho ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-openoffice To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [HEADS UP] Re: setting gcc42 as default compiler
Are you planning to fix compilation with gcj as part of this commit? It has been broken for some time now. While I haven't had the time to do a test run with the most recent port yet, I don't expect the problems to have miraculously gone away: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=107645 - Bartosz ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [HEADS UP] Re: setting gcc42 as default compiler
Hello, Once I thought that WITH_GNUGCJ is good, but it had not been maintained for long time. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=107645 Also, lang/gcc42 and lang/gcc42-withgcjawt CONFLICTS, (not explicitly stated though), I'd like to remove it soon. still I don't lost motivation for GCJ build, as this is a free software, but many inputs are required. From: Maho NAKATA [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [HEADS UP] Re: setting gcc42 as default compiler Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 08:57:46 +0900 (JST) From: Maho NAKATA [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: setting gcc42 as default compiler Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 09:52:18 +0900 (JST) Hi, As 7-CURRENT is going to ship with gcc42, I'd like to switch the default compiler for OOo ports to gcc42, too. General * depending on gcc-ooo which is specific/patched version is evil. also useless for other than ooo2 ports. * some people might also use gfortran as well, in this case we install gcc42 too and no additional compilers are needed. * facilitation for gcc part of Makefile. we do not need to consider about gcc-ooo (i386) and gcc41 part(amd64/gcj build), but single gcc42 part is enough. For 7-CURRENT * No additional compiler will be needed for both FreeBSD i386/amd64. For 6-STABLE * Just moving to one single compiler gcc42 is enough. Drawbacks * Sometimes we need additional gcc42 patches for OOo. Issues * gcc42-withgcjawt conflicts with gcc42 :( but I have an idea... Currently just i wrote this proposal. Any suggestions/comments are extremely appreciated. All the best, -- Nakata Maho ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-openoffice To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-openoffice To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SMF - A loja Online dos Profissionais de Inform ática!
Se não visualizar correctamente este e-mail, consulte o endereço http://newsletter.smf.com.pt Mini HDD 2048MB USB 2,0 , leitura: 6,1mb/seg;escrita: 1,5mb/... 16,95€ NEXTBASE SDV185-SD 313,00€ ViewSonic VX1945wm - TFT LCD 19 wide 302,70€ Asus G2PC - 17' TFT WXGA+ - Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 1902,80€ HP - Pavilion dv6389ea - Core2Duo T5600 1192,75€ CREATIVE Creative - Zen Stone 39,00€ HP -HP Officejet 4315 79,75€ TOM TOM ONE IBÉRICO 263,75€ Para mais informações contactar a equipa comercial SMF: 229 388 003 Esta informação tem como objectivo divulgar os produtos e eventos da SMF. Se não pretende continuar a receber este tipo de informação por e-mail, clique aqui. Actualize os seus dados | Subscreva News | Remover Contacto Oferta limitada à existência de stock. Salvaguardam-se erros de edição. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Mongolian localization to dsssl-docbook-modular port
Jun Kuriyama wrote: At Wed, 09 May 2007 10:52:43 +0800, Ganbold wrote: Is it possible to include this kind of a patch in /usr/ports/textproc/dsssl-docbook-modular port? I sent my email to kuriyama@ san (dsssl-docbook-modular maintainer), but no response from him. Sorry. Of cource I can integrate your patch into our ports tree. Kuriyama san, Since ports tree is unfrozen, could you integrate my patch to ports tree? Here is the patch. Please let me know if there is something wrong with this patch. thanks, Ganbold ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
