Re: List Spam Filtering

2013-05-12 Thread Steve O'Hara-Smith
On Sat, 11 May 2013 19:44:46 +0200
Julian H. Stacey j...@berklix.com wrote:

 Hi,
 Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote:
  On Thu, 09 May 2013 02:26:26 +0200
  Julian H. Stacey j...@berklix.com wrote:
  
   If list write access was changed to Subscribers Only:
 - List could silently discard such spam.
 - Postmaster@  ( webmaster@ weeding web archives) would have less
   work.
 - Less individual need to select spam phrases to copy to personal
   filters ( less time searching WTF dialect American above meant in
   English ;-).
  
  The downside is that it would require people to subscribe in
  order to ask a question, 
 
 True.  I suggest the up side outweighs the down side though.

From the point of view of subscribers perhaps, however from the
point of view of users who don't wish to subscribe in order to ask a single
question it is the other way round.

  this is also the reason for the convention of using
  Reply to all in FreeBSD mailing lists. It's been a convention for a
  *long* time, at least since FreeBSD 1.1 was shiny and new in 1993.
 
 I'm not intending to question or suggest any change re CC behaviour.
   (Maybe you mis-read or mis-infered what I intended, 

Not at all, just pointing out that the two things have a common
reason in the FreeBSD lists. Personally I doubt that either will change any
time soon.

or maybe I mis-wrote, or mis-implied, whatever, please forget that bit,
though as background I'd observe:
   Questions@ didn't exist for quite a while after FreeBSD started,
   Hackers@  some others preceded it.

A good many others indeed - but all the user lists have always
had the same conventions.

   Various people prune CC when they get littered with too many CC. )

True enough - and occasionally this loses the unsubscribed OP.

-- 
Steve O'Hara-Smith  |   Directable Mirror Arrays
C:WIN  | A better way to focus the sun
The computer obeys and wins.|licences available see
You lose and Bill collects. |http://www.sohara.org/
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


OT, i think...

2013-05-12 Thread Gary Kline

guys, 

if   goog had their browser from BSD it would help big-time; I use one of the
zillions of linux distros for my desktop.  I dont have a bleeding edge
cell. just something to call the cops or access [ small bus with wchair
lift.]  only have one hand, so cant easily hold cell and type blah * 3.

SO, the upshot is, since I use firefox mostly, and chrome, rarely, I got a
bit befuddled tonight trying to read an old philosopher's translation on
chrome.  I got to fess-up.  reading on the screen is vastly easier than
getting out a REAL book  and paperweights, and taking off my eyeglasses,
C!  tonight, I figured out howto enlarge the font and bring up the book.
--i read the prince by nick whatever.  this on google's browser.  it
took awhile before I realized that I wasnt hearing the words!   yes, the
speaker in the circle [[upper right]] read aloud   and I could glean
that much more by reading with eyes and ears.  ===but=== is there some
magic I ca n use to do an All, and then fire off the text-to-voice?

CAUTION
[[[the following is interesting only if you're into art schopenhauer.  
his works were not correctly xlated until {i think} 1954.  I bought the
p'back of his *Parerga and Paralipomena: A Collection of Philosophical
Essays*.  I never read it.  google has it, and I suppose I could cough pup
$whatever.  but only if they got their tts stuff working without me having to
mouse 600+ pages or whatever it requires.  ]]]
/CAUTION

anybody know howto make this All menu cmd work in chrome?  in ffox, it's
a simple edit-control-A

thanks much,

gary



-- 
 Gary Kline  kl...@thought.org  http://www.thought.org  Public Service Unix
  Twenty-six years of service to the Unix community.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: compatibility SCO (fwd)

2013-05-12 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Hi, cc questions@ was dropped so restoring
Forwarded from: Julian Stacey j...@berklix.com http://www.berklix.com/~jhs/

--- Forwarded Message

From gri...@goldnet.it Sun May 12 09:15:13 2013
Date: Sun, 12 May 2013 09:12:53 +0200
From: grillo gri...@goldnet.it
To: Julian H. Stacey j...@berklix.com
Subject: Re: compatibility SCO
In-Reply-To: 201305112344.r4bnimxd072...@fire.js.berklix.net
References: 201305112344.r4bnimxd072...@fire.js.berklix.net

On Sun, 12 May 2013 01:44:22 +0200, Julian H. Stacey
j...@berklix.com wrote:
 grillo wrote:
 I need use Microsoft Cobol Compiler and runtime developed for
 Xenix/Unix system V SCO using NETBSD or FreeBSD, it is possible? have
 binary compatibility ? environment compatibility ?
 thank you
 
 A long time since I looked at this, but as no one else answered yet,
 hints to look for,  maybe somebody'll correct it  post more useful info ;-)
 
 http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/index.html
 http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/linuxemu.html
 
  kernel options
 options IBCS2 /* SCO a.out emulation */
 options SYSVSHM # SYSV-style shared memory /*for X11R6 */
 options SYSVMSG # SYSV-style message queues
 options SYSVSEM # SYSV-style semaphores
 
 I recall when I last did cross OS work way back I needed a
 raft of include files  libs  custom or special version of ar etc.
 Which brings up questions of Copyright, depending what you'r doing
 (I'm not asking, your business  decision, I don't want to know about SCO !).
 
 The newer way might be to run SCO inside a virtual environment
 http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/virtualization-host.html
 
 BTW If you're doomed to run SCO, get hold of a SCO Skunkware CD,
 issued by SCO, free) full of FSF  PD etc tools to make raw SCO
 less annoying.
 
 You should search this archive:
   http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation
  probably susbscribe  ask there.
 
 IMO you'll probably have better luck with FreeBSD than NetBSD for this,
 (not will certainly, just probably at my guess, for this topic ;-)
 
 Cheers,
 Julian

Thank-you

I wish to use the compiler Microfocus cobol/2 writen for Unix
compatible with Sco Xenix and Sco OpenServer,
it generate a intermediate code that run win RUNTIME COBOL, the problem
is where must be install the cobol library for compilation and runtime
environment, and what terminfo to use;
if I use a virtual environment I work like now with no possibility to
extra periferal and external drive


--- End of Forwarded Message

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: List Spam Filtering

2013-05-12 Thread Jerry
On Sun, 12 May 2013 07:39:31 +0100
Steve O'Hara-Smith articulated:

 On Sat, 11 May 2013 19:44:46 +0200
 Julian H. Stacey j...@berklix.com wrote:
 
  Hi,
  Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote:
   On Thu, 09 May 2013 02:26:26 +0200
   Julian H. Stacey j...@berklix.com wrote:
   
If list write access was changed to Subscribers Only:
  - List could silently discard such spam.
  - Postmaster@  ( webmaster@ weeding web archives) would have
less work.
  - Less individual need to select spam phrases to copy to
personal filters ( less time searching WTF dialect American
above meant in English ;-).
   
 The downside is that it would require people to subscribe
   in order to ask a question, 
  
  True.  I suggest the up side outweighs the down side though.
 
   From the point of view of subscribers perhaps, however from
 the point of view of users who don't wish to subscribe in order to
 ask a single question it is the other way round.

I am not really a big fan of paying for a hunting license since I only
hunt once a year; however, they still make me do it. As a POC earlier
this year, I subscribed to this list under a different name  address,
returned to my MUA and the responding message from this list was
waiting. I replied to it and was there upon subscribed. Total time,
less than 1-1/2 minutes. And that included me taking a sip of coffee.
The time to remove myself from the list was similar. Hell, it takes me
longer than that to gather all of the info I might need to either ask
or respond to a question on this list.

   this is also the reason for the convention of using
   Reply to all in FreeBSD mailing lists. It's been a convention
   for a *long* time, at least since FreeBSD 1.1 was shiny and new
   in 1993.
  
  I'm not intending to question or suggest any change re CC behaviour.
(Maybe you mis-read or mis-infered what I intended, 
 
   Not at all, just pointing out that the two things have a
 common reason in the FreeBSD lists. Personally I doubt that either
 will change any time soon.
 
 or maybe I mis-wrote, or mis-implied, whatever, please forget
  that bit, though as background I'd observe:
  Questions@ didn't exist for quite a while after FreeBSD
  started, Hackers@  some others preceded it.
 
   A good many others indeed - but all the user lists have
 always had the same conventions.
 
  Various people prune CC when they get littered with too
  many CC. )

I never respond to CC'ers. If they cannot take the time to subscribe, I
cannot afford the time to respond.
 
   True enough - and occasionally this loses the unsubscribed OP.

Perhaps our list should include a disclaimer (I hate them) that states:

WARNING: CC ARE YOUR OWN RISK 

Actually, I think this is kind of funn:

From: Steve O'Hara-Smith st...@sohara.org
To: Julian H. Stacey j...@berklix.com
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org

Technically, I am responding to a CC'er who happens to be the list
operator/owner or whatever terminology turns you on. My sieve filters
are designed to filter out an CC messages; however, they are also
designed to accept any mail from FreeBSD*. Since I was not in the CC
address (directly), I ended up getting a CC'd mesage. I really have to
rework my filters.

-- 
Jerry ♔

Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
__

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org

Re: with ACPI=on, 9.1-RELEASE shutdown automatically

2013-05-12 Thread Xavier
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 01:03:45PM +0200, Eduardo Morras wrote:

Hi Eduardo,

 On Fri, 10 May 2013 12:34:14 +0200
 Xavier xavierfreebsdquesti...@gmail.com wrote:

  Hi to all,
 
  About this email subject, on acer Aspire 5634WLMi machine and
  9.1-RELEASE OS, FreeBSD shutdown the machine automatically in few
  minuts.

 In freebsd-es a similar problem was reported some months ago. The cause is 
 fan switch off after startup menu and rising temperature. It looks like ec 
 controller problem (Acer doesn't provide documentation about Embedded 
 Controller, all is done by try and error and can damage the laptop)

Yes, is the same situation.

I don't solved the problem. For this reason I post here now. And, I
wait a long time for try new situations and not crossposting the
problem in other mailing list.



  How can I debug the reason of the problem ?

 A not so good wokaround is down the temperature where cpu Hz is adjusted:

 #sysctl hw.acpi.thermal.user_override=1
 #sysctl hw.acpi.thermal.tz0._PSV=65C
 #sysctl hw.acpi.thermal.user_override=0


First of all, I load the correct ACPI mapping driver for acer laptops
( this situation ):

acpi_wmi(4)

root@casa:/root # kldstat | grep acpi
 41 0xc13dd000 462c acpi_wmi.ko
root@casa:/root #

Now I try yours values:

First, de defaults values:

root@casa:/root # sysctl -a | grep hw.acpi.thermal.user_override
hw.acpi.thermal.user_override: 0
root@casa:/root # sysctl -a | grep hw.acpi.thermal.tz0._PSV
hw.acpi.thermal.tz0._PSV: -1
root@casa:/root # sysctl -a | grep hw.acpi.thermal.tz1._PSV
hw.acpi.thermal.tz1._PSV: 95,0C
root@casa:/root # sysctl -a | grep hw.acpi.thermal.user_override
hw.acpi.thermal.user_override: 0
root@casa:/root #

I change to your suggerations:

root@casa:/root # sysctl hw.acpi.thermal.user_override=1
hw.acpi.thermal.user_override: 0 - 1
root@casa:/root # sysctl hw.acpi.thermal.tz0._PSV=65C
hw.acpi.thermal.tz0._PSV: -1 - 65,0C
root@casa:/root # sysctl hw.acpi.thermal.tz1._PSV=65C
hw.acpi.thermal.tz1._PSV: 95,0C - 65,0C
root@casa:/root # sysctl -a | grep hw.acpi.thermal.user_override
hw.acpi.thermal.user_override: 1
root@casa:/root # sysctl -a | grep hw.acpi.thermal.tz0._PSV
hw.acpi.thermal.tz0._PSV: 65,0C
root@casa:/root # sysctl -a | grep hw.acpi.thermal.tz1._PSV
hw.acpi.thermal.tz1._PSV: 65,0C
root@casa:/root #

I look for the temperature at the moment:

root@casa:/root # sysctl -a | grep temperature
acpi_tz1: temperature 67.0C: decreasing clock speed from 500 MHz to 250 MHz
acpi_tz1: temperature 67.0C: decreasing clock speed from 250 MHz to 125 MHz
hw.acpi.thermal.tz0.temperature: 73,0C
hw.acpi.thermal.tz1.temperature: 72,0C
dev.cpu.0.temperature: 75,0C
dev.cpu.1.temperature: 75,0C
root@casa:/root #

I try compile one port ... :

... while compile I look the temperature:

root@casa:/root # sysctl -a | grep temperature
acpi_tz1: temperature 67.0C: decreasing clock speed from 500 MHz to 250 MHz
acpi_tz1: temperature 67.0C: decreasing clock speed from 250 MHz to 125 MHz
hw.acpi.thermal.tz0.temperature: 95,0C
hw.acpi.thermal.tz1.temperature: 94,0C
dev.cpu.0.temperature: 92,0C
dev.cpu.1.temperature: 92,0C
root@casa:/root #

I break the compilation because if hw.acpi.thermal.tz%d.temperature (
of ACPI_THERMAL(4) ) = 100C the FreeBSD shutdown automacally.

 Or downgrade to 8.x


On 8.x I get the same problem.

Thanks, see you.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: List Spam Filtering

2013-05-12 Thread Rich Kulawiec
1. Restricting mailing lists to subscribers only has been a best
practice since the last century.  It's a very good anti-spam tactic.

2. However, doing so -- for a list run via Mailman, like this one --
does not pose a significant impediment for non-subscribers.  By default,
Mailman will hold traffic from non-subscribers for list-owner approval.
Provided the list-owners check that queue periodically and have reasonable
spam-spotting abilities, this works beautifully.

3. Note that Mailman, as part of that same mechanism, allows list-owners
to add non-subscribers to a list of those permitted to send traffic to
the list without approval.  This feature is probably more often used to
allow traffic from alternative addresses for subscribers, e.g., someone
is subscribed as f...@example.com but sends occasionally from f...@example.net.
But it can just as easily be used for non-subscribers if the list-owners
so choose.

4. List-owners may also find it useful to keep track of which spammers
repeatedly attempt to abuse the list and block them at the MTA -- which
has the desirable side effect of blocking them from ALL lists.  I do this
on a user/host/domain/network basis, and it's proven itself to be worth
the effort.

So: setting the subscribers-only flag on Mailman has major advantages,
at the cost of additional work on the part of list-owners -- which can
be mitigated in part across all lists by making changes to the MTA.

---rsk

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: ZFS on MBR does not boot at all

2013-05-12 Thread demelier . david
Le dimanche 5 mai 2013 22:20:43 Giorgos Keramidas a écrit :
 On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 13:29:18 +0200, David Demelier 
demelier.da...@gmail.com wrote:
  2013/4/18 David Demelier demelier.da...@gmail.com:
  Hello,
  I would like to use ZFS over MBR for multiboot purposes. I've followed
  that guide https://wiki.freebsd.org/RootOnZFS/ZFSBootPartition but it
  does not boot at all. The loader does not show up after choosing
  FreeBSD in the boot0 loader.
  
  The _ prompt appears but nothing starts. I've found many people over
  the web having the same problem but unfortunately no one found a
  solution.
  
  I think the offensive commands are ones with dd and zfsboot.
  Regards,
  
  So someone told me on IRC that the main problem was that I've put my
  partition swap as first partition in the FreeBSD slice and zfsboot
  *requires* that the zfs partition is the first.
  
  Can someone with right access to the wiki page may add a notice about
  this issue on https://wiki.freebsd.org/RootOnZFS/ZFSBootPartition
  please?
 
 Hi David,
 
 Thanks for following up with what the real problem was.  I updated the
 Wiki to include this:
 
 Note that partition order is important. It seems that zfsboot
 requires the freebsd-zfs partition to be the first, so make sure you
 add if first, before your swap partition.

Thank you :)

Regards,
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Can I avoid the display of pkg-messages in portmaster?

2013-05-12 Thread CyberLeo Kitsana
On 05/12/2013 12:37 AM, Leslie Jensen wrote:
 
 
 I do some work on remote machines and sometimes I have a need to execute
 additional commands after for example a portmaster -a command.
 
 Normally I use the  to separate commands but this does not work when
 portmaster displays pkg-messages.
 
 I cannot see in the portmaster manpage that there's a possibility to
 make the choice on displaying pkg-messages.
 
 Maybe a suggestion to further enhance portmaster in the future.
 
 To work around this I was thinking of maybe making a script that ran
 
 portmaster -a then a command to press space until one is sure that all
 messages has been displayed.
 
 On this I could need some help. My scripting skills are not that good.

To avoid interaction when scripting or logging portmaster, in addition
to the --no-confirm option, I usually set the following environment
variables prior to invocation:

BATCH=yes
PAGER=cat

The former should avoid any build-time port interaction (and mark the
port BROKEN if it must, so I can deal with it manually); the latter
causes portmaster to use 'cat' instead of 'more' to display the
pkg-messages afterwards.

-- 
Fuzzy love,
-CyberLeo
Technical Administrator
CyberLeo.Net Webhosting
http://www.CyberLeo.Net
cyber...@cyberleo.net

Furry Peace! - http://www.fur.com/peace/
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


ZFS partitioning

2013-05-12 Thread Roland van Laar

Hello,

I'm following the raidz[1] and mirror[2] guides for a ZFS root.
For a test installation on a 5 disk Virtualbox environment.

I see that all the disks get the same partitions, including swap and boot?
Why is that? And do I need those 5 boot and swap partitions?

Thank you for your time,

Rolad

[1]https://wiki.freebsd.org/RootOnZFS/GPTZFSBoot/RAIDZ1
[2]https://wiki.freebsd.org/RootOnZFS/GPTZFSBoot/9.0-RELEASE
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: ZFS partitioning

2013-05-12 Thread Terje Elde
On 12. mai 2013, at 15:21, Roland van Laar rol...@micite.net wrote:

 I see that all the disks get the same partitions, including swap and boot?
 Why is that? And do I need those 5 boot and swap partitions?

You don't need them, but there's a good chance you'll want them. 

Long story, short version: with raidz and mirror, you survive the loss of a 
disk. If you put boot on one, and that's the disk you loose, you're up shit 
creek, having chosen not to bring a paddle. ;)

It's also not a lot to loose by putting it on all of them. 

For swap, there's also performance-reasons. 

Terje

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: ZFS partitioning

2013-05-12 Thread Outback Dingo
notice my boot pool is a mirror, so disk 2 is identical to disk1, so if
disk1 ever dies, logically i could boot from disk two

pool: tank
 state: ONLINE
  scan: scrub repaired 0 in 0h0m with 0 errors on Sat May 11 13:20:41 2013
config:

NAMESTATE READ WRITE CKSUM
tankONLINE   0 0 0
  mirror-0  ONLINE   0 0 0
da34p3  ONLINE   0 0 0
da35p3  ONLINE   0 0 0

errors: No known data errors



On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 9:44 AM, Terje Elde te...@elde.net wrote:

 On 12. mai 2013, at 15:21, Roland van Laar rol...@micite.net wrote:

  I see that all the disks get the same partitions, including swap and
 boot?
  Why is that? And do I need those 5 boot and swap partitions?

 You don't need them, but there's a good chance you'll want them.

 Long story, short version: with raidz and mirror, you survive the loss of
 a disk. If you put boot on one, and that's the disk you loose, you're up
 shit creek, having chosen not to bring a paddle. ;)

 It's also not a lot to loose by putting it on all of them.

 For swap, there's also performance-reasons.

 Terje

 ___
 freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to 
 freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: ZFS partitioning

2013-05-12 Thread Paul Kraus
On May 12, 2013, at 9:48 AM, Outback Dingo outbackdi...@gmail.com wrote:

 notice my boot pool is a mirror, so disk 2 is identical to disk1, so if
 disk1 ever dies, logically i could boot from disk two

The zpool mirror does not mirror the bootblock. You need to manually 
add that to all the drives you may want to boot from.

 pool: tank
 state: ONLINE
  scan: scrub repaired 0 in 0h0m with 0 errors on Sat May 11 13:20:41 2013
 config:
 
NAMESTATE READ WRITE CKSUM
tankONLINE   0 0 0
  mirror-0  ONLINE   0 0 0
da34p3  ONLINE   0 0 0
da35p3  ONLINE   0 0 0
 
 errors: No known data errors

--
Paul Kraus
Deputy Technical Director, LoneStarCon 3
Sound Coordinator, Schenectady Light Opera Company

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: ZFS partitioning

2013-05-12 Thread Outback Dingo
On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 1:26 PM, Paul Kraus p...@kraus-haus.org wrote:

 On May 12, 2013, at 9:48 AM, Outback Dingo outbackdi...@gmail.com wrote:

  notice my boot pool is a mirror, so disk 2 is identical to disk1, so if
  disk1 ever dies, logically i could boot from disk two

 The zpool mirror does not mirror the bootblock. You need to
 manually add that to all the drives you may want to boot from.


yeah i know ive done both bootblocks, Thanks though


  pool: tank
  state: ONLINE
   scan: scrub repaired 0 in 0h0m with 0 errors on Sat May 11 13:20:41 2013
  config:
 
 NAMESTATE READ WRITE CKSUM
 tankONLINE   0 0 0
   mirror-0  ONLINE   0 0 0
 da34p3  ONLINE   0 0 0
 da35p3  ONLINE   0 0 0
 
  errors: No known data errors

 --
 Paul Kraus
 Deputy Technical Director, LoneStarCon 3
 Sound Coordinator, Schenectady Light Opera Company


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: OT, i think...

2013-05-12 Thread Edwin L. Culp W.
SIMIoff topic. (I think)

Sorry but I am envious that you have a chrome working.  I am stuck with the
===  chromium-25.0.1364.172_1 has known vulnerabilities:
chromium-25.0.1364.172_1 is vulnerable:
chromium -- multiple vulnerabilities

WWW: http://portaudit.FreeBSD.org/bdd48858-9656-11e2-a9a8-00262d5ed8ee.html
= Please update your ports tree and try again.
*** [check-vulnerable] Error code 1

Sorry but I'm not sure which is worse, having it or not having it.

Again i apologize.

ed


On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 4:00 AM, Gary Kline kl...@thought.org wrote:


 guys,

 if   goog had their browser from BSD it would help big-time; I use one of
 the
 zillions of linux distros for my desktop.  I dont have a bleeding edge
 cell. just something to call the cops or access [ small bus with wchair
 lift.]  only have one hand, so cant easily hold cell and type blah * 3.

 SO, the upshot is, since I use firefox mostly, and chrome, rarely, I got a
 bit befuddled tonight trying to read an old philosopher's translation on
 chrome.  I got to fess-up.  reading on the screen is vastly easier than
 getting out a REAL book  and paperweights, and taking off my eyeglasses,
 C!  tonight, I figured out howto enlarge the font and bring up the book.
 --i read the prince by nick whatever.  this on google's browser.  it
 took awhile before I realized that I wasnt hearing the words!   yes, the
 speaker in the circle [[upper right]] read aloud   and I could glean
 that much more by reading with eyes and ears.  ===but=== is there some
 magic I ca n use to do an All, and then fire off the text-to-voice?

 CAUTION
 [[[the following is interesting only if you're into art schopenhauer.
 his works were not correctly xlated until {i think} 1954.  I bought the
 p'back of his *Parerga and Paralipomena: A Collection of Philosophical
 Essays*.  I never read it.  google has it, and I suppose I could cough pup
 $whatever.  but only if they got their tts stuff working without me having
 to
 mouse 600+ pages or whatever it requires.  ]]]
 /CAUTION

 anybody know howto make this All menu cmd work in chrome?  in ffox, it's
 a simple edit-control-A

 thanks much,

 gary



 --
  Gary Kline  kl...@thought.org  http://www.thought.org  Public Service
 Unix
   Twenty-six years of service to the Unix community.

 ___
 freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to 
 freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org




-- 
Bienes Raíces in Coatepec, Veracruz, Mexico

http://www.facebook.com/pages/Inmobiliaria-Bienes-Raices-httpEcoManiainfo/102249989850215?sk=photos_albums
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


ZFS mirror install /mnt is empty

2013-05-12 Thread Roland van Laar

Hello,

I followed these[1] step up to the Finishing touches.
I'm using a 9.1 Release.

After the install I go into the shell and /mnt is empty.
The mount command shows that the zfs partitions are mounted.
When I reboot the system it can't find the bootloader.

What can I do to fix this?

Thanks,

Roland van Laar

[1] https://wiki.freebsd.org/RootOnZFS/GPTZFSBoot/9.0-RELEASE
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: ZFS partitioning

2013-05-12 Thread Joshua Isom
You may not want to mirror the boot block.  That way you can update one 
boot block, test it before copying the other.  If the new boot block 
fails to boot, the BIOS should go to the next hard drive and boot the 
mirror.  I don't know if it's possible to detect which drive you're 
actually booting from to know for sure it worked though.  A back up is 
better than a mirror.  With a mirror, you're more likely to fail to boot.


On 5/12/2013 12:26 PM, Paul Kraus wrote:

On May 12, 2013, at 9:48 AM, Outback Dingo outbackdi...@gmail.com wrote:


notice my boot pool is a mirror, so disk 2 is identical to disk1, so if
disk1 ever dies, logically i could boot from disk two


The zpool mirror does not mirror the bootblock. You need to manually 
add that to all the drives you may want to boot from.


pool: tank
state: ONLINE
  scan: scrub repaired 0 in 0h0m with 0 errors on Sat May 11 13:20:41 2013
config:

NAMESTATE READ WRITE CKSUM
tankONLINE   0 0 0
  mirror-0  ONLINE   0 0 0
da34p3  ONLINE   0 0 0
da35p3  ONLINE   0 0 0

errors: No known data errors


--
Paul Kraus
Deputy Technical Director, LoneStarCon 3
Sound Coordinator, Schenectady Light Opera Company

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org



___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: compatibility SCO

2013-05-12 Thread Marco Steinbach

On Thu, 9 May 2013, grillo wrote:

I need use Microsoft Cobol Compiler and runtime developed for Xenix/Unix 
system V SCO using NETBSD or FreeBSD, it is possible? have binary 
compatibility ? environment compatibility ?

thank you


You're probably forced to stay with MS Cobol for reasons beyond your
control -- try and have a look at devel/open-cobol, nonetheless.

Worked quite painlessly for getting run-off-the-mill code away from
RM/Cobol about a year or two ago.

MfG CoCo
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: ZFS mirror install /mnt is empty

2013-05-12 Thread Trond Endrestøl
On Sun, 12 May 2013 23:11+0200, Roland van Laar wrote:

 Hello,
 
 I followed these[1] step up to the Finishing touches.
 I'm using a 9.1 Release.
 
 After the install I go into the shell and /mnt is empty.
 The mount command shows that the zfs partitions are mounted.
 When I reboot the system it can't find the bootloader.
 
 What can I do to fix this?
 
 Thanks,
 
 Roland van Laar
 
 [1] https://wiki.freebsd.org/RootOnZFS/GPTZFSBoot/9.0-RELEASE

Looking through the wiki notes I would do a couple of things in a 
different way.

Since you're running 9.1-RELEASE you should take into account the need 
for the /boot/zfs/zpool.cache file until 9.2-RELEASE exist or you 
switch to the latest 9-STABLE.

Create your zpool using a command like this one:

zpool create -o cachefile=/tmp/zpool.cache -m /tmp/zroot zroot /dev/gpt/disk0

Copy the /tmp/zpool.cache file to /tmp/zroot/boot/zfs/zpool.cache, or 
in your case to /mnt/boot/zfs/zpool.cache after extracting the base 
and kernel stuff.

In the wiki section Finishing touches, perform step 4 before step 3. 
The final command missing in step 3 should be zfs unmount -a once 
more. Avoid step 5 at all cost!

Maybe this recipe is easier to follow, it sure works for 9.0-RELEASE 
and 9.1-RELEASE, I only hope you're happy typing long commands, and 
yes, command line editing is available in the shell:

https://ximalas.info/2011/10/17/zfs-root-fs-on-freebsd-9-0/

Due to advances in hard drive technology, for the worse I'm afraid, 
i.e. 4K disk blocks, I wouldn't bother enabling compression on any ZFS 
file systems. I might change my blog posts to reflect this stop gap.

If you do happen to have 4K drives, you might want to check out this 
blog post:

https://ximalas.info/2012/01/11/new-server-and-first-attempt-at-running-freebsdamd64-with-zfs-for-all-storage/

-- 
+---++
| Vennlig hilsen,   | Best regards,  |
| Trond Endrestøl,  | Trond Endrestøl,   |
| IT-ansvarlig, | System administrator,  |
| Fagskolen Innlandet,  | Gjøvik Technical College, Norway,  |
| tlf. mob.   952 62 567,   | Cellular...: +47 952 62 567,   |
| sentralbord 61 14 54 00.  | Switchboard: +47 61 14 54 00.  |
+---++___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org