Install disk gives READ_DMA recovered from missing interrupt errors...
] in namespace, AE_NOT_FOUND SearchNode 0xc6d5e3e0 StartNode 0xc6d5e3e0 ReturnNode 0 ACPI-1287: *** Error: , AE_NOT_FOUND ACPI-0438: *** Error: Looking up [\_PR_.CPU0] in namespace, AE_NOT_FOUND SearchNode 0xc6d5e3e0 StartNode 0xc6d5e3e0 ReturnNode 0 ACPI-1287: *** Error: , AE_NOT_FOUND ad0: WARNING - READ_DMA recovered from missing interrupt ad0: WARNING - READ_DMA recovered from missing interrupt Mounting root from ufs :/dev/md0 /stand/sysinstall running as init on vty0 * Cheers, Aled. -- Aled Treharne - Network Operations - Mistral Internet Tel: 0870 751 6300 Fax: 0870 751 6399 http://www.mistral.net This electronic message contains information from Mistral Internet which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. If you have received this electronic message in error, please notify us by telephone or email (to the numbers or address above) immediately. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Win200 gateway blocking FBSD html?
On Thu, 2004-02-19 at 08:30, Alex de Kruijff wrote: Dear Robert, The problem - I cannot access any web sites with http. Doesn't matter if I use Konqueror, Mozilla or Lynx. Yet, all the Windows machines on this network can browse the web (using Internet Explorer) without difficulty. [...] Is it somehow possible that the Windows gateway only allows Internet Explorer to work? Doesn't seem possible, but what do I know? All suggestions welcome. No a firewall doesn't know anything like that. It makes it choices based [...] True... known working client. The other option is that is a proxy server [...] Ah! And here lies the crux of it. If you have Microsoft Proxy server installed with Proxy client on each of the machines, the Proxy client hooks into the IP stack of the client machine. I've never looked into it in any depth, but this may be what is causing your headaches. The solution is either to set up the proxy server to proxy HTTP properly, install a different Proxy software on there (try Wingate), or alternatively, install FreeBSD and squid on there. :) Cheers, Aled. -- Aled Treharne - Network Operations - Mistral Internet Tel: 0870 751 6300 Fax: 0870 751 6399 http://www.mistral.net Statements made are at all times subject to Mistral's Terms and Conditions of Business, which are available upon request. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Need help with strange routing situation
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 22:45, Philip Kizer wrote: Donald Burr of Borg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [Description of:] Our gateway machine and server gets its own IP, IP A. My desktop machine is hooked up via ethernet. It should get IP B. Same thing as above for my roomie's desktop, except it gets IP C. [all else] Ideally I'd like them to be NAT'ted behindIP A Not really that strange a routing situation, and definitely pretty easy, here's one possible way: [SNIP solution] Just wondering... ..I've had to play with bridging recently because I'm playing with protocols that have IP's embedded in them, so I can't use NAT - would it be possible (though probably somewhat more complicated) to bridge the two ethernet interfaces together and NAT the third interface to an overloaded IP A? That way you get around needing to NAT the servers (which in my case I couldn't do anyway). Cheers, Aled. -- Aled Treharne [EMAIL PROTECTED] ThinkNuts! ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: no response on unnumbered bridged interface?
-Original Message- From: Micheal Patterson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 September 2003 23:49 To: Aled Treharne; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: no response on unnumbered bridged interface? [SNIP] Is the system configured to forward packets? Assuming that 5.x has the following variables available (I still run 4.8 here), try: sysctl -a |grep forwarding You should see net.inet.ip.forwarding: 1. If it's 0, then your system won't pass traffic between the the interfaces. You're right, it won't. *sigh* But it does now. Thanks for that. I can't believe I missed that one out. There ends a weekend of pissing around (all hardware sucks). :) Now to see if I can trim down my ruleset a little bit. Cheers, Aled. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
no response on unnumbered bridged interface?
Hi guys. I've just upgraded (aka reinstalled) my firewall up to 5.1-RELEASE. The hardware isn't particularly new, but it's been quite happily trudging along for the past few years using 4.something. However, with 5.1, I've found weirdness and I wanted to check to see if this is expected behaviour or not. The machine has two 3C509's ep0 (external) and ep1 (internal). Ep0 is numbered and the following sysctl variables set: Net.link.ether.bridge_cfg=ep0,ep1 Net.link.ether.bridge_ipfw=1 Net.link.ether.bridge=1 Now it bridges quite happily ( I have IPFIREWALL_DEFAULT_ACCEPT set in the kernel), and I can ping back and forth without any problem. However, if I try and access the bridge from a machine connected to the switch on the inside interface, it doesn't respond. Tcdump on the box shows ECHO request packets, I see arp traffic (and the inside machine has the correct mac address), but I see no echo responses. This is a problem, since I'd like to admin this box from inside my network. :) I also wouldn't mind the box seeing the internal network... I can't see anything wrong with what I've got, and there's nothing in the docs about this problem. I also experienced this problem with a Intel EtherExpress Pro I had in there as the internal interface, and both the ep1 card and the Intel NIC have worked in other boxes. Has anyone got any ideas on what's going on here? As far as I can tell, the config is identical to my previous installation... Cheers, Aled. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
