Re: FreeBSD:: How to set VLAN priority?
Alex Liptsin wrote this message on Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 11:54 +: I work with FreeBSD 9.1 RELEASE. I had configured VLANs on my server, but I can't find a way to configure VLAN priority. How can I do it? Looks like you can't w/ the default VLAN code: BUGS No 802.1Q features except VLAN tagging are implemented. You could probably implement it w/ ng_patch, but that would also mean you'd lose the feature of the card adding the VLAN tag for you... -- John-Mark Gurney Voice: +1 415 225 5579 All that I will do, has been done, All that I have, has not. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Tell me how to increase the virtual disk with ZFS?
Alexander Yerenkow wrote this message on Sat, May 11, 2013 at 18:13 +0300: zpools or increase/decrease UFS partitions. growfs(8) NAME growfs -- grow size of an existing ufs file system HISTORY The growfs utility first appeared in FreeBSD 4.4. -- John-Mark Gurney Voice: +1 415 225 5579 All that I will do, has been done, All that I have, has not. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [IMPORTANT] Adaptec no longer supporting iir(4) driver ...
User Freebsd wrote this message on Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 22:44 -0300: For those that haven't been following the discussion on this, the iir(4) driver in FreeBSD 6.x appears to have a deadlock issue under medium to heavy load, where the 'blocked' state just continues to rise until file accesses just no longer work ... So, if you are running a server that is using the iir(4) device driver and are considering upgrading to FreeBSD 6.x and beyond, or are looking to build a new machine using a device that relies on this driver, do so at your own peril ... Please note that this deadlock issue exists on *both* the ICP Vortex cards, *and* the Intel based RAID controllers ... Have you tried the driver in -current and/or 6.1-R? Specificly v1.14 and v1.13.2.1 of iir.c that limits the simq to 32 commands? We are running w/ this modifications w/o issues on 6.0-R w/ SRCU31A and SRCU42L cards... We have a few GDT cards also that I don't believe we are having any issues with... Infact, scottl tracked down that change after a bit of proding from me on behalf of my employer nCircle... (Though it helped that he was able to reproduce it in his lab.)... -- John-Mark Gurney Voice: +1 415 225 5579 All that I will do, has been done, All that I have, has not. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: iir(4) driver (Was: Re: Safe card to replace for ICP Vortex GDT851...)
Scott Long wrote this message on Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 09:35 -0600: FreeBSD. Making big statements in public that they don't, or that it's not up to ones' standards or hopes, isn't terribly useful or productive. I'd hate for FreeBSD to turn into That Other BSD that publically abuses and harasses vendors for percieved sleights. There are much more positive and product ways to fix problems and form good relationships, and those ways are actively being pursued by some people right now. The problem is that these pursuits are not public knowlege, and very often trying to get support through even better than normal channels (i.e. using your system builder's extra clout) doesn't get you this info... The most they tell you is sorry, no support, and we are just being nice to even tell you this since you're running something else... I believe that honest information is better than hopes that turn up fruitless... I've had no end of issues w/ Intel trying to get them to fix various issues w/ their cards (SRCU31A and SRCU42L), and they won't even acknowledge that failing drives due to SELECTION_TIMEOUT, ABORTED COMMAND, OVERLAPPED COMMANDS ATTEMPTED or DISCONNECT_TIMEOUT is a major issue... Due to the fact that SRCU31A is so old, they haven't qualified the newer 2.42 firmware w/ the card... We are going to look at it, since we haven't seen any failed hd's on the 2.42 firmware... And here again is my standard disclaimer: I highly recommend that anyone who takes their data integrity seriously should spend time qualifying any RAID solution that they are interested in before putting it into production. What works for your workload might not work for someone else's workload, and vice-versa. Agreed, luckily we found the hang issue w/ 5.x before we shipped, so we were saved yet another disaster... Patrick M. Hausen wrote: Hello! 'k, just to clarify here ... the new products won't be based on the iir(4) driver then? Yes, they won't. Basically, should the iir(4) driver be considered EOE also? As far as Adaptec and ICP Vortex are concerned, yes. Since the driver is Open Source, there is no enforced EOE, just orphanage, if nobody is willing to work on it. To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- John-Mark Gurney Voice: +1 415 225 5579 All that I will do, has been done, All that I have, has not. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 6.0-RELEASE/AMD64 Ram Capacity?
Douglas K. Rand wrote this message on Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 14:11 -0600: Nathan I seem to recall various threads relating to problems with Nathan machines running at or above 4GB ram... what if any issues Nathan still exist? Kris Some specific drivers do not work on such systems. FreeBSD Kris itself has no problems. Is there a means of telling (or even better, a list) which drivers handle (or those that don't) more than 4 GB of RAM? http://www.freebsd.org/projects/busdma/ -- John-Mark Gurney Voice: +1 415 225 5579 All that I will do, has been done, All that I have, has not. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bash scripting -- Usage of arrays
Jayesh Jayan wrote this message on Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 02:39 +0530: Below is the output. # sh array.sh Install the bash port (as root: pkg_add -r bas), and then try again using bash... FreeBSD doesn't have bash installed by default (and hence, /bin/sh is not bash like it is usually on Linux), and our sh doesn't have that feature... -- John-Mark Gurney Voice: +1 415 225 5579 All that I will do, has been done, All that I have, has not. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bash scripting -- Usage of arrays
Jayesh Jayan wrote this message on Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 03:19 +0530: I already have bash installed from ports. It is bash 2.05b. But below you were running sh, and not bash... if you do sh array.sh, it will not reinterpet the #!/bin/bash line, and re-exec it with the program in part because /bin/bash doesn't exist on the system, as bash is installed in /usr/local/bin/bash... Please try with: bash array.sh instead, and see if that works.. On 11/30/05, John-Mark Gurney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jayesh Jayan wrote this message on Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 02:39 +0530: Below is the output. # sh array.sh Install the bash port (as root: pkg_add -r bas), and then try again using bash... FreeBSD doesn't have bash installed by default (and hence, /bin/sh is not bash like it is usually on Linux), and our sh doesn't have that feature... -- John-Mark Gurney Voice: +1 415 225 5579 All that I will do, has been done, All that I have, has not. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: to list all the devices in freebsd definition analyse
kylin wrote this message on Sun, Nov 27, 2005 at 10:55 +0800: I i can use pciconf in freebsd to list the pci device ,but how to list the device tree in freeebsd? devinfo II i got some anornymous definition on devclass driver and device that differ from the current man page i think they seems reasonable but how can devclass Represents a bus or leaf device driver while driver still Represents a bus or leaf-level end-device driver ? and device is just a instance of bus or (leaf) end-device.?? is it oop? can the disigner of the arch show us a word?:) read device(9).. and devclass(9).. I'm not quite sure what you are asking here, but take a look at a bunch of the other drivers... My zoran driver (http://people.freebsd.org/~jmg/zoran.html) is both a driver, and a bus for i2c... -- John-Mark Gurney Voice: +1 415 225 5579 All that I will do, has been done, All that I have, has not. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FreeBSD's Visual Identity: Outdated?
Nikolas Britton wrote this message on Thu, Dec 23, 2004 at 22:46 -0600: 2. I cringe when I see Times New Roman, again redo the whole site with a modern web font: Arial, Helvetica, Verdana, Etc. (ever here of Cascading Style Sheets?) you mean a sans-serif font? yes, most computer display fonts should be sans-serif since the screen resolution does not always allow you to do that... (and Helvetica isn't that modern, about 50 years old now it appears)... As for CSS, it appears that we do use CSS on the site: link rel=stylesheet type=text/css href=./index.css / And part of CSS is letting people choose what font they want to display the site in... It appears at least Mozilla chooses Times by default... So I'd more complain to the browers that display with the default font.. -- John-Mark Gurney Voice: +1 415 225 5579 All that I will do, has been done, All that I have, has not. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FreeBSD's Visual Identity: Outdated?
Nikolas Britton wrote this message on Thu, Dec 23, 2004 at 22:46 -0600: 2. I cringe when I see Times New Roman, again redo the whole site with a modern web font: Arial, Helvetica, Verdana, Etc. (ever here of Cascading Style Sheets?) you mean a sans-serif font? yes, most computer display fonts should be sans-serif since the screen resolution does not always allow you to do that... (and Helvetica isn't that modern, about 50 years old now it appears)... As for CSS, it appears that we do use CSS on the site: link rel=stylesheet type=text/css href=./index.css / And part of CSS is letting people choose what font they want to display the site in... It appears at least Mozilla chooses Times by default... So I'd more complain to the browers that display with the default font.. -- John-Mark Gurney Voice: +1 415 225 5579 All that I will do, has been done, All that I have, has not. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Ugly Huge BSD Monster
Denis Troshin wrote this message on Mon, Sep 01, 2003 at 16:58 +0700: Sorry for all the responses that don't directly answer your question, but you did ask it in a rather tactless way by saying it's a mess w/o understanding the reasoning behind it. Almost every package I install requires a few other packages. This 'idea of using dependent packages' turns FreeBSD (and other unix-systems) to an ugly monster. This is because the packages are ment to be a one size fits all system. If you want to eliminate some of the dependancies, then you are free to build the port yourself. There is plenty of documentation in the handbook about how the port system works. For example, I don't need Perl or Python but a few packages I install require them. This is for the people that do want the perl and/or python extensions that the package provides. The packages are targeted at the widest audience. If you don't need them, then build the port yourself. Does exist a programming under unix without these dependencies? P.S. Under Windows it is possible to write not bad applications which depend just on libraries (KERNEL32, USER32, GDI32). And these libs exist on every base system!!! Just like libc, libcrypto, libcurses, libssl, etc. It's just that some of the GNU libraries change too often, and are not used by the base system. As someone else pointed out, you have to have vbrunXXX.dll installed and of the proper version. Many windows installs tell you how/where to download said app. Though windows doesn't let you just run a single command like: pkg_add -r python and automaticly get the program installed. The real problem is the ports software. You need to complain to the authors of the ports for writing the code in this manner. We choose to make the software easier to install so new people don't have to learn as much about configuring and installing software. If you don't like the ports system, we don't for you to use it. You can just go out and build and install all the software by hand. Is it possible in unix? Before I thought that unix programs very compact, but they are huge! They are, it's just some aren't writen to be small. I hope this help you understand. -- John-Mark Gurney Voice: +1 415 225 5579 All that I will do, has been done, All that I have, has not. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
