Re: Network throughput
On 11.01.2012 13:24, Mike Woods wrote: I'm trying to gather network throughput information on a box of ours and I'm having a little problem, the throughput is to be measured on a per-minute basis and i've been trying to use netstat for this (count now - count before/timeperiod) however netstats byte counter resets far too quickly to be usefull (this is a busy gb link), i've had a look at vnstat but this only seems to operation on an hour or higher and I need to get down to the minute, does anyone have any suggestions of a tool better suited to this ? I have been using net-snmp daemon in combination with mrtg. Displays nice traffic graphs. Greetings, Ott ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Network throughput
On 11.01.2012 16:57, Matthew Seaman wrote: Yes -- mrtg is nice, but it relies on the snmp interface counters, and in this case with Gb traffic levels a 32bit counter will wrap in a few minutes. mrtg samples the interface counter every 5 minutes IIRC, so would probably be confused by that wrap-around happening at around the same frequency. Unless you switch to using 64bit interface counters, but I don't know if mrtg can cope with integer types that wide... Cheers, Matthew Yes, I have seen that wrapping with few hundred megabit port traffic. New snmp port has 64 bit counter option. Personally, I have already built a new snmp with 64 bit counter option, but not yet tested if it works. Maybe somebody here can comment? regards, Ot ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Options for Secondary DNS Service?
On 11.04.2011 6:43, Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote: Hi, I am looking for a secondary DNS service. Any suggestion? It is not for a non-profit organisation so I am not necessarily looking for a free solution, but I am wondering if there are reliable solutions for less than what dyndns charges ($40 /year/zone). Approximately, how many zones? Ott ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Why do you use a devil as a mascot?
On 12.11.2010 6:21, Chad Perrin wrote: On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 11:39:28PM +, José Silveira wrote: Why do you use a devil as a mascot? For me it is nonsense... It makes Christians, Jwishes and Muslins run away! Perhaps it is merely an effective booby trap to catch small-minded people who are too narrow in their thinking to consider doing something intelligent like search the Web, Wikipedia, or the mailing list archives for an answer to this question. It's not like it doesn't come up every damned six months. IMHO, this is the best answer so far. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
problem mounting USB drive
Greetings! Please help with the following issue: I am trying to mount external USB Windows disk drive to my FreeBSD system. After connecting the drive, the following log entries are created: Aug 10 18:23:56 ott kernel: ugen2.2: Western Digital at usbus2 Aug 10 18:23:56 ott kernel: umass0: Western Digital External HDD, class 0/0, rev 2.00/2.40, addr 2 on usbus2 Aug 10 18:23:56 ott kernel: umass0: SCSI over Bulk-Only; quirks = 0x Aug 10 18:23:57 ott kernel: umass0:0:0:-1: Attached to scbus0 Aug 10 18:23:57 ott kernel: da0 at umass-sim0 bus 0 scbus0 target 0 lun 0 Aug 10 18:23:57 ott kernel: da0: WDC WD16 00BEVE-11UYT0 Fixed Direct Access SCSI-0 device Aug 10 18:23:57 ott kernel: da0: 40.000MB/s transfers Aug 10 18:23:57 ott kernel: da0: 152627MB (312581808 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 19457C) Mounting the drive gives the following error: # mount -t msdosfs /dev/da0s1 /mnt/ mount_msdosfs: /dev/da0s1: Invalid argument In the /var/log/messages the following message appears: Aug 10 18:27:40 ott kernel: mountmsdosfs(): bad FAT32 filesystem The drive is OK and works fine with Windows. Also, USB flash thumb drives work fine, when used in the same manner with my FreeBSD. System version is 8.0-STABLE, but this is probably irrelevant here. best regards, Ott Köstner ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: problem mounting USB drive
Antonio Vieiro wrote: The fact that the drive is working on Windows does not mean it's FAT32 formatted. It may as well be NTFS formatted (man mount_ntfs). Doublecheck you're running a FAT32 system: FreeBSD is saying you're not. Thank You! Looks better now, but the volume is still unusable. # mount_ntfs /dev/da0s1 /mnt/ r...@ott / # mount -v|grep da0 /dev/da0s1 on /mnt (ntfs, local, fsid 71000800) # df -H|grep da0 /dev/da0s1 160G 26G134G16%/mnt ...but all commands result with an error like this... # ls -l /mnt/BACKUP ls: /mnt/BACKUP: Argument list too long :( Ott ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: problem mounting USB drive
Adam Vande More wrote: On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 11:37 AM, Ott Köstner o...@zzz.ee wrote: # df -H|grep da0 /dev/da0s1 160G 26G134G16%/mnt ...but all commands result with an error like this... # ls -l /mnt/BACKUP ls: /mnt/BACKUP: Argument list too long That generally means there are too many files to process via default shell memory settings. Something like: find /mnt/BACKUP should work in that case. Yes, generally this means that there are too many files, but not in this case. Even find gives me: # find /mnt/BACKUP find: /mnt/BACKUP: Argument list too long or # ls -ld /mnt/BACKUP ls: /mnt/BACKUP: Argument list too long Some directories are not big at all. My question is, is is a FreeBSD problem here, or is there something wrong with the drive (or am I doing something wrong here)? For some reason my BSD does not want to eat that drive... ;) Ott ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: problem mounting USB drive
Adam Vande More wrote: On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 12:19 PM, Ott Köstner o...@zzz.ee wrote: Adam Vande More wrote: On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 11:37 AM, Ott Köstner o...@zzz.ee wrote: # ls -ld /mnt/BACKUP ls: /mnt/BACKUP: Argument list too long Some directories are not big at all. My question is, is is a FreeBSD problem here, or is there something wrong with the drive (or am I doing something wrong here)? For some reason my BSD does not want to eat that drive... Apparently that's a known bug kern/136873 you can try sysutils/ntfsprogs to mount it. Thank You again, but even this does not seem to help in the first place. 1) Installed ntfsprogs-2.0.0_1 from ports. After that: # ntfsmount /dev/da0s1 /mnt/ fuse: failed to open fuse device: No such file or directory fuse_mount failed. Unmounting /dev/da0s1 (WD Passport) I can see the drive information: # ntfsinfo -m /dev/da0s1 Volume Information Name of device: /dev/da0s1 Device state: 3 Volume Name: WD Passport Volume State: 1 Volume Version: 3.1 Sector Size: 512 Cluster Size: 16384 Volume Size in Clusters: 9768020 [...snip...] 2) After that... # ntfsfix /dev/da0s1 Mounting volume... OK Processing of $MFT and $MFTMirr completed successfully. NTFS volume version is 3.1. NTFS partition /dev/da0s1 was processed successfully. 3) Trying to mount again: # ntfsmount /dev/da0s1 /mnt/ Volume is scheduled for check. Please boot into Windows TWICE, or use the 'force' option. NOTE: If you had not scheduled check and last time accessed this volume using ntfsmount and shutdown system properly, then init scripts in your distribution are broken. Please report to your distribution developers (NOT to us!) that init scripts kill ntfsmount or mount.ntfs-fuse during shutdown instead of proper umount. Mount failed. 4) UHH!!! greetings, Ott ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: java jdk16 port
Joe R. Jah wrote: Hello all, I want to install java jdk16 port. Make build spits this: Seems, that you have not updated your ports tree before starting java port install. See # pwd /usr/ports/java/diablo-jre16 # cat distinfo MD5 (diablo-latte-freebsd6-amd64-1.6.0_07-b02.tar.bz2) = e32080c1f09e59bf77891287a0225b0a SHA256 (diablo-latte-freebsd6-amd64-1.6.0_07-b02.tar.bz2) = b019b485acafdcfe2a2770ea9d2a547f3918f78ba76191714072c57b47935eef SIZE (diablo-latte-freebsd6-amd64-1.6.0_07-b02.tar.bz2) = 27577577 Greetings, Ott Köstner --8-- Because of licensing restrictions, you must fetch the distribution manually. Please open http://java.sun.com/javase/downloads/index.jsp in a web browser and follow the Download link for JDK US DST Timezone Update Tool - 1_3_11 to obtain the time zone update file, tzupdater-1_3_11-2008i.zip. Please place the downloaded file(s) in /usr/ports/distfiles. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/java/diablo-jdk16. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/java/jdk16. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/java/jdk16. --8-- The only tzupdater available on that website is tzupdater-1_3_15-2009g.zip. During the build there were several similar messages and I could download the needed files; tzupdater-1_3_15-2009g.zip happens to be one of them. Does anyone know where to download tzupdater-1_3_11-2008i.zip, or knows a workaround to install jdk16 without it? Regards, Joe ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: firefox 3.5 exited on signal 12
On Sunday 05 July 2009 8:32:35 am Unga wrote: I have installed firefox 3.5,1 port (make install clean) on FreeBSD 7.2 i386. Firefox crashes when it try to display Theora video (http://www-cs-faculty.stanford.edu/~nick/theora-soccer/) with following message on logs: kernel: pid 1106 (firefox-bin), uid 1001: exited on signal 12 (core dumped) Do others experience it? Is there a fix for this? Same here. It crashes... pid 26921 (firefox-bin), uid 1001: exited on signal 12 Greetings, Ott Köstner ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
SOLVED (Re: firefox 3.5 exited on signal 12)
On Sunday 05 July 2009 11:10:18 am Ott Köstner wrote: On Sunday 05 July 2009 8:32:35 am Unga wrote: I have installed firefox 3.5,1 port (make install clean) on FreeBSD 7.2 i386. Firefox crashes when it try to display Theora video (http://www-cs-faculty.stanford.edu/~nick/theora-soccer/) with following message on logs: kernel: pid 1106 (firefox-bin), uid 1001: exited on signal 12 (core dumped) Do others experience it? Is there a fix for this? Same here. It crashes... pid 26921 (firefox-bin), uid 1001: exited on signal 12 Rebuilt kernel with options P1003_1B_SEMAPHORES # POSIX-style semaphores Now it plays Theora video and does not crash any more. :) Greetings, Ott Köstner ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Firefox 3.5 mutex error
On Saturday 04 July 2009 3:52:28 pm Mike Clarke wrote: I can't get firefox-3.5,1 to run on my 6.4 system. It fails with the message Fatal error 'Recurse on a private mutex.' at line 986 in file /usr/src/lib/libpthread/thread/thr_mutex.c (errno = 13). My ports tree was updated 2 days ago and I ran portupgrade -a afterwards. BTW, just installed it. Seems to work great! First, updated everything FF35 depends on. You can check the dependencies: # portversion -vR firefox-3.5,1 Make sure You do # portsdb -U before 'portversion' and after you have downloaded new ports. Greetings! O.K. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Unable to start clamsmtpd
On Sunday 14 June 2009 9:28:31 pm Carmel wrote: I just installed clamsmtpd on a fresh FreeBSD-7.2 installation. When I attempt to start the program via the start up script supplied by the port maintainer, I receive this error message: Clamsmtpd: invalid Outaddress socket name or ip: start I have clamsmtp running fine on my mail server. Hope I can help You. First, please check that the directory, where clamsmtpd creates socket, is writable by clamsmtpd user. For example, I have yhe following lines in my config file: [...] # The address clamd is listening on ClamAddress: /var/run/clamav/clamd.sock [...] # User to switch to User: clamav ...and... # ls -ld /var/run/clamav/ drwxr-xr-x 2 clamav clamav 512 Nov 27 2008 /var/run/clamav/ # ls -l /var/run/clamav/clamd.sock srwxrwxrwx 1 clamav clamav 0 Nov 27 2008 /var/run/clamav/clamd.sock ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: what is the best way to remove a program?
Mark Hartkemeyer wrote: I was installing the mysql51-server port and I had a message that the install could not proceed, because mysql50-client was already installed. I simply ran a cd and then a make deinstall in the mysql50-client directory. Is this is the best way to remove a program? Does it depend on how the program was added (compiled versus prebuilt binary added with pkg_add -r)? I've tried pkg_delete in the past, but it seems to always complain about dependencies and not actually remove the program. In this case, pkg_delete should do the work for you. with best regards, Ott ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Unable to start clamsmtpd
On Sunday 14 June 2009 10:46:01 pm Jerry wrote: I had: ClamAddress: /var/run/clamav/clamd in my config file. I changed the clamd to clamd.sock but it did not make a difference. The clamd.pin, clamd.sock= and freshclam.pid files are in the /var/run/clamav directory. This is becoming really annoying. Aparently, clamdsmtp will not create its own clamsmtpd.pid file. Name does not matter, but '/var/run/clamav/' should be owned by 'clamsmtp' owner. Also 'clamd.conf' should be edited. The socket must be the same in both configuration files. # Path to a local socket file the daemon will listen on. # Default: disabled (must be specified by a user) LocalSocket /var/run/clamav/clamd.sock All 3 programs should run under the same username: PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND 56863 clamav 3 450 236M 28292K ucond 0 0:03 0.98% clamd 21484 clamav 1 40 15704K 984K accept 1 1:44 0.00% clamsmtpd 56894 clamav 1 200 19188K 636K pause 1 0:39 0.00% freshclam Works fine. I can send all my conf files, if needed. Probably not a very good idea to copy/paste these into this list. My clamd works fine for some time already. This very e-mail goes through my clamd... greetings, Ott ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Streaming server
On Monday 25 May 2009 4:41:04 pm Jos Chrispijn wrote: I have some short movies (a la YouTube) that I would like to show as video streams. Presenting them by download is messing up my bandwidth (...). Can someone tell me if there is a simple solution installing such a stream service/server into FreeBDS 7.2? Have You tried FFserver? NAME ffserver - FFserver video server SYNOPSIS ffserver [options] DESCRIPTION FFserver is a streaming server for both audio and video. It supports several live feeds, streaming from files and time shifting on live feeds (you can seek to positions in the past on each live feed, pro- vided you specify a big enough feed storage in ffserver.conf). [...snip...] # pkg_info ffmpeg-2008.07.27_10 Information for ffmpeg-2008.07.27_10: Comment: Hyper fast realtime audio/video encoder/converter, streaming server [...snip...] WWW: http://ffmpeg.mplayerhq.hu/ With best regards, Ott Köstner -- Kuula Z-Raadiot / Listen Z-Radio: http://radio.zzz.ee/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: X-Org problem
On Saturday 25 April 2009 11:57:38 am Paul B. Mahol wrote: On 4/24/09, Ott Koestner o...@zzz.ee wrote: Neal Hogan wrote: On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 7:33 AM, Ott Koestner o...@zzz.ee wrote: Dear list, After upgrading Xorg from ports to the latest version xorg-server-1.6.0,1 xorg-7.4_1 I am experiencing very unpleasant phenomenon, Xorg randomly exiting with message: Apr 24 15:16:16 ott kernel: pid 7445 (Xorg), uid 0: exited on signal 6 Apr 24 15:16:16 ott kdm-bin[1020]: X server for display :0 terminated unexpectedly Also, there is a strange behavior with dual-head mode -- when moving cursor from one screen to another, the little white arrow remains on the other screen. Please help! What might it be? Recompiled probably everything related to Xorg. Using Nvidia driver version nvidia-driver-96.43.11 I'm no expert, but to help those that are, I suggest that you post the contents of your /etc/X11/Xorg.0.log (perhaps a dmesg, too). After the crash Xorg is instantly restarted. Probably there is no reason to copy the whole log here. Everything looks normal for some time and then it restarts just at a random moment. No reason to blame hardware. It was stable before pre-previous Xorg server update (over 100 days uptime). Ill-effects started after I upgraded to xorg-server-1.5.3. Mouse buttons started to freeze randomly. That is why I chose to upgrade to xorg-server-1.6.0. Xorg.0.log.old ends like this: ... ... Fatal server error: Caught signal 11. Server aborting Please consult the The X.Org Foundation support at http://wiki.x.org for help. Please also check the log file at /var/log/Xorg.0.log for additional information. pid 7797 (Xorg), uid 0: exited on signal 6 pid 47182 (PBReg), uid 1001: exited on signal 10 pid 47199 (NetworkTray), uid 1001: exited on signal 11 pid 47200 (NetworkTray), uid 1001: exited on signal 11 With best regards, Ott Koestner I saw on svn-head that signal 6 crash is caused by FreeBSD malloc/libc, and is fixed on CURRENT but that may not be related to your problem. Now I have isolated the problem with x.org but still not been able to find a solution. X crash is not random, but keyboard associated and appears 100% when pressing any key on keyboard and and letting it auto-repeat. Meanwhile, updated the whole system (kernel and world) to 7.2-PRERELEASE. Recompiled xf86-input-keyboard and xorg-server, but nothing helps in this case. :( With best regards, Ott Köstner ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
X-Org problem
Dear list, After upgrading Xorg from ports to the latest version xorg-server-1.6.0,1 xorg-7.4_1 I am experiencing very unpleasant phenomenon, Xorg randomly exiting with message: Apr 24 15:16:16 ott kernel: pid 7445 (Xorg), uid 0: exited on signal 6 Apr 24 15:16:16 ott kdm-bin[1020]: X server for display :0 terminated unexpectedly Also, there is a strange behavior with dual-head mode -- when moving cursor from one screen to another, the little white arrow remains on the other screen. Please help! What might it be? Recompiled probably everything related to Xorg. Using Nvidia driver version nvidia-driver-96.43.11 With best regards, Ott Köstner ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: X-Org problem
Neal Hogan wrote: On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 7:33 AM, Ott Köstner o...@zzz.ee wrote: Dear list, After upgrading Xorg from ports to the latest version xorg-server-1.6.0,1 xorg-7.4_1 I am experiencing very unpleasant phenomenon, Xorg randomly exiting with message: Apr 24 15:16:16 ott kernel: pid 7445 (Xorg), uid 0: exited on signal 6 Apr 24 15:16:16 ott kdm-bin[1020]: X server for display :0 terminated unexpectedly Also, there is a strange behavior with dual-head mode -- when moving cursor from one screen to another, the little white arrow remains on the other screen. Please help! What might it be? Recompiled probably everything related to Xorg. Using Nvidia driver version nvidia-driver-96.43.11 I'm no expert, but to help those that are, I suggest that you post the contents of your /etc/X11/Xorg.0.log (perhaps a dmesg, too). After the crash Xorg is instantly restarted. Probably there is no reason to copy the whole log here. Everything looks normal for some time and then it restarts just at a random moment. No reason to blame hardware. It was stable before pre-previous Xorg server update (over 100 days uptime). Ill-effects started after I upgraded to xorg-server-1.5.3. Mouse buttons started to freeze randomly. That is why I chose to upgrade to xorg-server-1.6.0. Xorg.0.log.old ends like this: ... (II) LoadModule: mouse (II) Loading /usr/local/lib/xorg/modules/input//mouse_drv.so (II) Module mouse: vendor=X.Org Foundation compiled for 1.6.0, module version = 1.4.0 Module class: X.Org XInput Driver ABI class: X.Org XInput driver, version 4.0 (**) PS/2 Mouse: Device: /dev/sysmouse (==) PS/2 Mouse: Protocol: Auto (**) PS/2 Mouse: always reports core events (**) Option Device /dev/sysmouse (==) PS/2 Mouse: Emulate3Buttons, Emulate3Timeout: 50 (**) PS/2 Mouse: ZAxisMapping: buttons 4 and 5 (**) PS/2 Mouse: Buttons: 9 (**) PS/2 Mouse: Sensitivity: 1 (II) XINPUT: Adding extended input device PS/2 Mouse (type: MOUSE) (**) PS/2 Mouse: (accel) keeping acceleration scheme 1 (**) PS/2 Mouse: (accel) filter chain progression: 2.00 (**) PS/2 Mouse: (accel) filter stage 0: 20.00 ms (**) PS/2 Mouse: (accel) set acceleration profile 0 (II) PS/2 Mouse: SetupAuto: hw.iftype is 4, hw.model is 0 (II) PS/2 Mouse: SetupAuto: protocol is SysMouse Fatal server error: Caught signal 11. Server aborting Please consult the The X.Org Foundation support at http://wiki.x.org for help. Please also check the log file at /var/log/Xorg.0.log for additional information. (II) UnloadModule: kbd (II) UnloadModule: mouse (II) Screen 0 shares mem io resources (II) Screen 1 shares mem io resources -- # dmesg | tail -n 15 pid 6766 (PBReg), uid 1001: exited on signal 10 pid 6787 (NetworkTray), uid 1001: exited on signal 11 pid 6796 (NetworkTray), uid 1001: exited on signal 11 pid 6478 (Xorg), uid 0: exited on signal 6 pid 7710 (PBReg), uid 1001: exited on signal 10 pid 7727 (NetworkTray), uid 1001: exited on signal 11 pid 7730 (NetworkTray), uid 1001: exited on signal 11 pid 7445 (Xorg), uid 0: exited on signal 6 pid 8095 (PBReg), uid 1001: exited on signal 10 pid 8112 (NetworkTray), uid 1001: exited on signal 11 pid 8115 (NetworkTray), uid 1001: exited on signal 11 pid 7797 (Xorg), uid 0: exited on signal 6 pid 47182 (PBReg), uid 1001: exited on signal 10 pid 47199 (NetworkTray), uid 1001: exited on signal 11 pid 47200 (NetworkTray), uid 1001: exited on signal 11 With best regards, Ott Köstner ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Please help! (Re: GEOM: da0: corrupt or invalid GPT detected.)
On Tuesday 06 January 2009 9:49:36 pm Ott Köstner wrote: Dear List! I have such a problem (or is it a problem?): # dmesg | grep da0 da0 at twa0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 da0: AMCC 9650SE-8LP DISK 4.06 Fixed Direct Access SCSI-5 device da0: 100.000MB/s transfers da0: 1430481MB (2929625088 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 182360C) GEOM: da0: corrupt or invalid GPT detected. GEOM: da0: GPT rejected -- may not be recoverable. Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/da0s1a Please help! The problem persists. Built new world and kernel. The system is now 7.1-STABLE amd64. When booting up, the system gives messages da0 at twa0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 da0: AMCC 9650SE-8LP DISK 4.06 Fixed Direct Access SCSI-5 device da0: 100.000MB/s transfers da0: 1430481MB (2929625088 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 182360C) GEOM: da0: corrupt or invalid GPT detected. GEOM: da0: GPT rejected -- may not be recoverable. also # dmesg |grep da1 da1 at twa0 bus 0 target 1 lun 0 da1: AMCC 9650SE-8LP DISK 4.06 Fixed Direct Access SCSI-5 device da1: 100.000MB/s transfers da1: 1430481MB (2929625088 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 182360C) GEOM: da1: corrupt or invalid GPT detected. GEOM: da1: GPT rejected -- may not be recoverable. The question is why does sysinstall say? WARNING: A geometry of 182360/255/63 for da1 is incorrect. Using a more likely geometry. If this geometry is incorrect or you are unsure as to whether or not it's correct, please consult the Hardware Guide in the Documentation submenu or use the (G)eometry command to change it now. 182360/255/63 is exactly the number what driver gives at boot time. Still 182360 * 63 * 255 = 2929613400 2929613400 does not match with 2929625088 ( -11688 sectors) How can I fix this? With best regards, O.K. System is 7.0 amd64. Just a fresh install. The problem appeared with sysinstall. The message appeared: WARNING: A geometry of 182360/255/63 for da0 is incorrect. Using a more likely geometry. If this geometry is incorrect or you are unsure as to whether or not it's correct, please consult the Hardware Guide in the Documentation submenu or use the (G)eometry command to change it now. Never seen something like this before, when installing FreeBSD. Do not see eny 'Documentation submenu' in sysinstall. How can I fix it? Everything seems to work OK, exept these messages. I am just about to build world and new kernel... regards, O.K. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org -- Mõõda oma inteneti kiirust / Test Your Internet speed http://tallinn.speedtest.net/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
GEOM: da0: corrupt or invalid GPT detected.
Dear List! I have such a problem (or is it a problem?): # dmesg | grep da0 da0 at twa0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 da0: AMCC 9650SE-8LP DISK 4.06 Fixed Direct Access SCSI-5 device da0: 100.000MB/s transfers da0: 1430481MB (2929625088 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 182360C) GEOM: da0: corrupt or invalid GPT detected. GEOM: da0: GPT rejected -- may not be recoverable. Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/da0s1a System is 7.0 amd64. Just a fresh install. The problem appeared with sysinstall. The message appeared: WARNING: A geometry of 182360/255/63 for da0 is incorrect. Using a more likely geometry. If this geometry is incorrect or you are unsure as to whether or not it's correct, please consult the Hardware Guide in the Documentation submenu or use the (G)eometry command to change it now. Never seen something like this before, when installing FreeBSD. Do not see eny 'Documentation submenu' in sysinstall. How can I fix it? Everything seems to work OK, exept these messages. I am just about to build world and new kernel... regards, O.K. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Happy new Year!
List! Happy new Year! Just installed a new FreeBSD to an old (junk) Pentium 2 computer here. Still buildng the world... But anyway, Happy New Year! Yeah, I have some minor problems with BSD and distributed web crawler @ http://www.majestic12.co.uk/ , but let's forget about these problems right now... Happy New Year! O.K. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Network Stack Code Re-write (Possible motivations...?)
Martes G Wigglesworth wrote: A year, or two, ago, I found such information buried within the Juniper website; however, upon recent attempts at further investigation, both for learning about certifications, and subject matter for this topic, I am unable to locate said information. The historic Juniper blurbs were very informative. I am sure that the information is still available, however, I have not been successful in locating it. Maybe this link helps a little: http://www.juniper.net/solutions/literature/white_papers/200264.pdf Network Operating System Evolution JUNOS Software: Architectural Choices at the Forefront of Networking Juniper’s main operating system, JUNOS software, is an excellent illustration of this industry trend . The basis of the JUNOS software kernel comes from the FreeBSD UNIX OS, an open-source software system . The JUNOS software kernel and infrastructure have since been heavily modified to accommodate advanced and unique features such as state replication, nonstop active routing and in-service software upgrades, all of which do not exist in the donor operating system . Nevertheless, the JUNOS software tree can still be synchronized with the FreeBSD repository to pick the latest in system code, device drivers and development tool chains, which allows Juniper Networks engineers to concentrate on network-specific development . Best regards, O.K. -- Testi oma Interneti kiirust / Test Your Internet speed: http://speedtest.zzz.ee/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Snow in my Server
Gary Hartl wrote: Help, I'm in southern Ontario and I have 20cm of snow on my freebsd 7-release server. IT seems to be causeing some http outages. My FBSD 6-.0 doesn't seem to be affected thou. Any suggestions, First, make sure Your ports tree is up to date: # csup -h cvsup.xx.freebsd.org /usr/share/examples/cvsup/ports-supfile Check the snow version: # pkg_version -v|grep snow Maybe your snow needs upgrade: # portupgrade snow See what software is using snow: # portversion -rv snow If you do not snow any more, just: # pkg_delete snow ;) Greetings! ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Suitability question
On Thursday 18 December 2008 11:25:51 pm Patrick Baldwin wrote: I'm thinking I might be best of trying to built him a really locked-down, high security box, almost an Internet appliance. All he really does is use the Web, and a little light word processing. What do people think of FreeBSD as the base OS for this idea? In this case, I would recommend to use PC-BSD. http://www.pcbsd.org/ PC-BSD is full FreeBSD 7.1, with nice grapical installer, pre-configured for desktop use. Xorg, KDE, Firefox, Thunderbird, Open Office, flash, etc. -- all will work out of the box... After installing PC-BSD, you can think of it as a standard FreeBSD -- Upgrade ports, build kernel, etc. Regards, O.K. -- Mõõda oma inteneti kiirust / Test Your Internet speed http://tallinn.speedtest.net/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: listserver problems?
On Thursday 18 December 2008 1:47:01 pm Michael Scheidell wrote: might be generic listserver issues, but I noticed that at least on freebsd-jail list, it does NOT strip out dkim/domainkeys signatures. that might not be to bad, but it does 'mung' the headers, so dkim signed email passed through freebsd mailing list server comes back as a forged signature. Probably depends, how and with what software you check it. At least, SpamAssassin responds correctly to this signature: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,DKIM_SIGNED, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Checker-URL: http://info.zzz.ee Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [69.147.83.53]) by zzz.ee (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8CBEFD53A for o...@zzz.ee; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 13:48:00 +0200 (EET) Received: from hub.freebsd.org (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF81916315A; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 11:47:13 + (UTC) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org) Received: from hub.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FDEC106571F; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 11:47:12 + (UTC) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org) Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B19D1065679; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 11:47:03 + (UTC) (envelope-from scheid...@secnap.net) Received: from fl.us.spammertrap.net (fl.us.spammertrap.net [204.89.241.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 338948FC32; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 11:47:03 + (UTC) (envelope-from scheid...@secnap.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fl.us.spammertrap.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55E43E6089; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 06:47:02 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=secnap.net; h= content-type:subject:mime-version:user-agent:from:date :message-id:received:received:x-virus-scanned; s=dkim; t= 1229600821; bh=D2GNQjbJ0V6T+z6wbS0oY6z3CMZTNqKW4+nF83Mp06k=; b=Y tjC87NB2Vu+z8zFh6JMsKQhxhlNafGj3yyQMJW/EvfyDDQxsMWtvx/kx5gRJnHDD oJOt0zcSAXUTiD/EhOuRCrb3KOr1nErTcWPns31B44q/4dL7l09vnuT+VswvRZoZ 3jZFZZGHZRr2FtOjgdDQkJKZIk0elPc2i67Bif30Hc= X-Amavis-Modified: Mail body modified (using disclaimer) - fl.us.spammertrap.net X-Virus-Scanned: SpammerTrap(r) SME-150 1.89 at fl.us.spammertrap.net Received: from secnap3.secnap.com (secnap3.secnap.com [204.89.241.130]) by fl.us.spammertrap.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E99E5E6088; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 06:47:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from 21.sub-70-222-163.myvzw.com ([10.80.0.4]) by secnap3.secnap.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 18 Dec 2008 06:47:01 -0500 Message-ID: 494a3835.30...@secnap.net whoever is working on the listservers can contact me for assistance on it. maybe just a postfix header IGNORE rule would strip it back out. Talking about Mailman configuration, personally I would like if these mailinglists here had 'subject_prefix', something like [FreeBSD-QUESTIONS:%d] Greetings, O.K. -- Mõõda oma inteneti kiirust / Test Your Internet speed http://tallinn.speedtest.net/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: PHP5 as apache module using packages
Mel wrote: On Wednesday 17 December 2008 16:08:43 Ott Köstner wrote: Nothing special needed. Just a regular Apache, MySQL, and PHP. 5...10 minute install from FreBSD ports. [...snip...] And thus, can run as php-cgi. There are performance and configuration management reasons to use the module, but these come more into play with mass virtual hosting, rather then a dedicated server for one web app. Oh, sorry! A little misunderstanding. By regular I actually meant PHP installed as an Apache module. Don't actually no anybody or any reason to run it as cgi. Best regards, O.K. -- Testi oma Interneti kiirust / Test Your Internet speed: http://speedtest.zzz.ee/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: lang/php5 installed Apache 2.0 Handler for apache22
On Thursday 18 December 2008 3:57:26 pm Tom Worster wrote: i've read that php has an Apache 2.2 Handler since 5.2. i installed the www/apache22 port and lang/php5. things seem to work but phpinfo() reports: Server API = Apache 2.0 Handler. is that as it should be? If You look further, There should be an 'apache2handler' section in the phpinfo(), with more specific information. Should report something like: Apache Version Apache/2.2.11 (FreeBSD) mod_ssl/2.2.11 OpenSSL/0.9.8e DAV/2 PHP/5.2.8 with Suhosin-Patch [...etc...] -- Mõõda oma inteneti kiirust / Test Your Internet speed http://tallinn.speedtest.net/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
socket: too many open file descriptors (Re: Python with many threads)
Hello, Answering my own mail ;) Ott Köstner wrote: Still, something locks up in the system, when I increase the number Python threads with http://grub.org/?q=en/node/204 [...] The frequency of these messages increases with 70 threads. And with 200 threads the system locks up totally -- almost no access from web. [I can still access the system and kill the process :) ] Clearly, there is some limit in the system. It is not memory, cpu or bandwidth. If the number of threads is also not limited, it must be something else. What might it be? Eventually, I found out that the limiting factor here is named, not capable of handling more request and causing Apache to lock up. But now I am trapped here. Is there anybody who can help? In /var/log/messages: named[63198]: socket: too many open file descriptors I have googled this, but no help. Recompiled bind, adding -DFD_SETSIZE=2048 to CFLAGS. No help. sockstat |grep -c named does not big numbers. With 60 Grubng/Pyhton threads this number is around 20, rises over 100 with 100 threads, but this is still much lower than 2048... Any ideas? Regards, O.K. -- Testi oma Interneti kiirust / Test Your Internet speed: http://speedtest.zzz.ee/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: socket: too many open file descriptors (Re: Python with many threads)
On Wednesday 17 December 2008 4:17:46 pm Michel Talon wrote: Ott Köstner wrote: In /var/log/messages: named[63198]: socket: too many open file descriptors See the sysctl variables: kern.maxfiles kern.maxfilesperproc kern.maxfiles: 12328 kern.maxfilesperproc: 11095 Note that Google leads immediately to this: http://unix.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/FreeBSD/net/2008-07/msg00251.html Yes, actually I saw this. 11095 seemed a big number in this case. Increased to: kern.maxfiles: 25000 kern.maxfilesperproc: 2 ... and the problem remains... :( There are also messages like this: named[63198]: client 127.0.0.1#60448: error sending response: host unreachable Regards, O.K. -- Mõõda oma inteneti kiirust / Test Your Internet speed http://speedtest.zzz.ee/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: PHP5 as apache module using packages
On Wednesday 17 December 2008 4:02:05 pm Gary Hartl wrote: The software is elgg.org, it is social software, i'm working on a project for a world of warcraft guild (yes this is a money deal), they are looking for a facebookish type site with some custom world of warcraft stuff done. Just experimented with Elgg. Here it is: http://elgg.zzz.ee/index.php Nothing special needed. Just a regular Apache, MySQL, and PHP. 5...10 minute install from FreBSD ports. Port: elgg-0.9.1 Path: /usr/ports/www/elgg Info: Blogging and social networking platform make make install create database and it starts like any other PHP/SQL application... Greetings, O.K. -- Mõõda oma inteneti kiirust / Test Your Internet speed http://speedtest.zzz.ee/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Python with many threads
Michel Talon wrote: Nothing limits the number of concurrent threads. Personnally i have checked i can run Grub Next Generation Python Client with 600 threads without any problem. niobe% uname -a FreeBSD niobe.lpthe.jussieu.fr 7.0-STABLE FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #0: Tue Jul 22 10:31:01 CEST 2008 niobe% python Python 2.5.2 (r252:60911, Jul 5 2008, 13:44:44) Still, something locks up in the system, when I increase the number Python threads with http://grub.org/?q=en/node/204 With more than 50 threads I start to get random messages like: Exception in thread 40: Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/local/lib/python2.5/threading.py, line 486, in __bootstrap_inner self.run() The frequency of these messages increases with 70 threads. And with 200 threads the system locks up totally -- almost no access from web. [I can still access the system and kill the process :) ] Clearly, there is some limit in the system. It is not memory, cpu or bandwidth. If the number of threads is also not limited, it must be something else. What might it be? Network traffic is moderate: IP traffic Recall that python threads are just native threads, but these threads are protected from trashing the python state by a single lock, the GIL, which is released when you do IO. This allows to effectively thread IO, but not python computation. The FreeBSD thread library has no particular limitations, you can run hundreds or thousands of threads without much problem, for example under Java. Regards, O.K. [sorry for HTML message in the list] -- Testi oma Interneti kiirust / Test Your Internet speed: http://speedtest.zzz.ee/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Python with many threads
Hello list, Trying to run Grub Next Generation Python Client (http://grub.org/?q=en/node/204) on my FreeDSD 7.1 box with as many threads as possible. Python version is 2.5.2. The question is, what limits the number of concurrent threads I can run? I have free memory and cpu, but starting from around 50 threads, Python starts to give random errors like this: Exception in thread 30: Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/local/lib/python2.5/threading.py, line 486, in __bootstrap_inner self.run() The number of errors increases rapidly with even bigger number of threads. Is there any way I can increase the maximum number of Python threads? With best regards, O.K. -- Mõõda oma inteneti kiirust / Test Your Internet speed http://speedtest.zzz.ee/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Nvidia (Re: FreeBSD 7.0: which distribution)
Johan Hendriks wrote: the only reason that people use FreeBSD/i386 on 64-bit processors is that some binary-only drivers are only availaboe for i386. what kind of drivers would be missing for the amd64 distribution ??? Nvidia!!! I am one ot these folks, using 32-bit FreeBSD on my desktop, just because of Nvidia drivers. Wanted to ask, maybe somebody here knows, is there any hope to expect 64 bit Nvidia drivers in some reasonable future? What is the problem with Nvidia? Why they do not provide 64 bit drivers? Regards, O.K. -- Testi oma Interneti kiirust / Test Your Internet speed: http://speedtest.zzz.ee/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Unix program that sends email directly using MX record
Peter Boosten wrote: The most recent vulnerabilities of Postfix are from August and September 2008, and I still use it. Also I use (with great happyness) Sendmail on two machines, without any problems. The only problem ever caused was by clamav. Would be interesting to know, what kind of problems have been there with CLAMAV? Just to be aware. I am currently using clamav /index.php/Clamav-0.94.2 on some FreeBSD computers. Regards, O.K. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: top incorrectly reporting process time
Kris Kennaway wrote: Ott Köstner wrote: Kris Kennaway wrote: Ott Köstner wrote: Jeremy Chadwick wrote: On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 04:34:01PM +0200, Ott Köstner wrote: On several FreeBSD machines I have the following problem: What FreeBSD version? (It matters) 7.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD But I can experience it also on a 7.0 machine. Seems that top reports incorrectly processes with multiple threads. $ top -bUbind last pid: 21635; load averages: 0.73, 0.46, 0.29 up 1+00:17:18 16:48:10 54 processes: 1 running, 53 sleeping Mem: 66M Active, 1174M Inact, 204M Wired, 36K Cache, 112M Buf, 555M Free Swap: 2048M Total, 2048M Free PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND 979 bind8 440 40288K 32916K select 0 0:16 0.00% named $ ps -ax|grep 979 979 ?? Ss 1:11.26 /usr/sbin/named -n 5 -t /var/named -u bind Check top -H to display the statistics for individual threads. Kris # top -bUmysql last pid: 8336; load averages: 0.33, 0.30, 0.24 up 13+22:36:2908:47:07 157 processes: 1 running, 156 sleeping Mem: 1163M Active, 2058M Inact, 555M Wired, 160M Cache, 214M Buf, 22M Free Swap: 4096M Total, 432K Used, 4095M Free PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND 1079 mysql 9 200 92316K 70472K sigwai 1 0:04 0.00% mysqld 1015 mysql 1 80 7056K 1332K wait 1 0:00 0.00% sh - # top -bHUmysql last pid: 8497; load averages: 0.36, 0.32, 0.25 up 13+22:37:4308:48:21 148 processes: 4 running, 144 sleeping Mem: 1147M Active, 2068M Inact, 554M Wired, 156M Cache, 214M Buf, 32M Free Swap: 4096M Total, 432K Used, 4095M Free PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND 1079 mysql 440 92316K 70472K select 0 4:10 0.00% mysqld 1079 mysql 440 92316K 70472K select 0 3:12 0.00% mysqld 1079 mysql 440 92316K 70472K select 1 1:59 0.00% mysqld 1079 mysql 440 92316K 70472K ucond 0 0:47 0.00% mysqld 1079 mysql 440 92316K 70472K select 0 0:26 0.00% mysqld 1079 mysql 200 92316K 70472K sigwai 1 0:04 0.00% mysqld 1079 mysql 440 92316K 70472K ucond 0 0:04 0.00% mysqld 1079 mysql 440 92316K 70472K ucond 1 0:01 0.00% mysqld 1015 mysql 80 7056K 1332K wait 1 0:00 0.00% sh 1079 mysql 440 92316K 70472K ucond 0 0:00 0.00% mysqld -- This seems to be the only inconsistent one: # ps -ax|grep 1079 1079 con- S576:13.90 [mysqld] Check that your ps binary is in sync with your kernel, i.e. rebuild world with the same sources you used to build your kernel. Kris I did that. First, downloaded source with csup, built world, kernel, installed kernel and world. Then rebuilt kernel once again and installed it. On another machine (w/ 32bit kernel): # top -bU bind; top -bHU bind last pid: 21738; load averages: 0.02, 0.20, 0.27 up 12+18:08:53 10:39:45 56 processes: 1 running, 55 sleeping Mem: 207M Active, 1494M Inact, 223M Wired, 70M Cache, 112M Buf, 4700K Free Swap: 2048M Total, 12K Used, 2048M Free PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND 979 bind8 440 52576K 44652K select 1 9:42 0.00% named last pid: 21739; load averages: 0.02, 0.20, 0.27 up 12+18:08:53 10:39:45 56 processes: 1 running, 55 sleeping Mem: 207M Active, 1494M Inact, 223M Wired, 70M Cache, 112M Buf, 4712K Free Swap: 2048M Total, 12K Used, 2048M Free PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND 979 bind 440 52576K 44652K select 1 9:42 0.00% named 979 bind 440 52576K 44652K ucond 1 5:52 0.00% named 979 bind 440 52576K 44652K ucond 0 5:51 0.00% named 979 bind 440 52576K 44652K ucond 0 5:50 0.00% named 979 bind 440 52576K 44652K ucond 1 5:49 0.00% named 979 bind 440 52576K 44652K ucond 1 5:48 0.00% named 979 bind 440 52576K 44652K ucond 1 0:16 0.00% named 979 bind 200 52576K 44652K sigwai 1 0:00 0.00% named # ps -aHx | grep 979; echo ;ps -ax | grep 979 979 ?? Is 0:00.01 /usr/sbin/named -n 5 -t /var/named -u bind 979 ?? Ss 5:49.41 /usr/sbin/named -n 5 -t /var/named -u bind 979 ?? Ss 5:50.73 /usr/sbin/named -n 5 -t /var/named -u bind 979 ?? Ss 5:50.36 /usr/sbin/named -n 5 -t /var/named -u bind 979 ?? Ss 5:52.14 /usr/sbin/named -n 5 -t /var/named -u bind 979 ?? Ss 5:48.15 /usr/sbin/named -n 5 -t /var/named -u bind 979 ?? Ss 0:15.69 /usr/sbin/named -n 5 -t /var/named -u bind 979 ?? Ss 9:41.68 /usr/sbin/named -n 5 -t /var/named -u bind 21761 p0 R+ 0
Re: top incorrectly reporting process time
Kris Kennaway wrote: Ott Köstner wrote: Kris Kennaway wrote: Ott Köstner wrote: Kris Kennaway wrote: Ott Köstner wrote: Jeremy Chadwick wrote: On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 04:34:01PM +0200, Ott Köstner wrote: On several FreeBSD machines I have the following problem: What FreeBSD version? (It matters) 7.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD But I can experience it also on a 7.0 machine. Seems that top reports incorrectly processes with multiple threads. $ top -bUbind last pid: 21635; load averages: 0.73, 0.46, 0.29 up 1+00:17:18 16:48:10 54 processes: 1 running, 53 sleeping Mem: 66M Active, 1174M Inact, 204M Wired, 36K Cache, 112M Buf, 555M Free Swap: 2048M Total, 2048M Free PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND 979 bind8 440 40288K 32916K select 0 0:16 0.00% named $ ps -ax|grep 979 979 ?? Ss 1:11.26 /usr/sbin/named -n 5 -t /var/named -u bind Check top -H to display the statistics for individual threads. Kris # top -bUmysql last pid: 8336; load averages: 0.33, 0.30, 0.24 up 13+22:36:2908:47:07 157 processes: 1 running, 156 sleeping Mem: 1163M Active, 2058M Inact, 555M Wired, 160M Cache, 214M Buf, 22M Free Swap: 4096M Total, 432K Used, 4095M Free PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND 1079 mysql 9 200 92316K 70472K sigwai 1 0:04 0.00% mysqld 1015 mysql 1 80 7056K 1332K wait 1 0:00 0.00% sh - # top -bHUmysql last pid: 8497; load averages: 0.36, 0.32, 0.25 up 13+22:37:4308:48:21 148 processes: 4 running, 144 sleeping Mem: 1147M Active, 2068M Inact, 554M Wired, 156M Cache, 214M Buf, 32M Free Swap: 4096M Total, 432K Used, 4095M Free PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND 1079 mysql 440 92316K 70472K select 0 4:10 0.00% mysqld 1079 mysql 440 92316K 70472K select 0 3:12 0.00% mysqld 1079 mysql 440 92316K 70472K select 1 1:59 0.00% mysqld 1079 mysql 440 92316K 70472K ucond 0 0:47 0.00% mysqld 1079 mysql 440 92316K 70472K select 0 0:26 0.00% mysqld 1079 mysql 200 92316K 70472K sigwai 1 0:04 0.00% mysqld 1079 mysql 440 92316K 70472K ucond 0 0:04 0.00% mysqld 1079 mysql 440 92316K 70472K ucond 1 0:01 0.00% mysqld 1015 mysql 80 7056K 1332K wait 1 0:00 0.00% sh 1079 mysql 440 92316K 70472K ucond 0 0:00 0.00% mysqld -- This seems to be the only inconsistent one: # ps -ax|grep 1079 1079 con- S576:13.90 [mysqld] Check that your ps binary is in sync with your kernel, i.e. rebuild world with the same sources you used to build your kernel. Kris I did that. First, downloaded source with csup, built world, kernel, installed kernel and world. Then rebuilt kernel once again and installed it. On another machine (w/ 32bit kernel): # top -bU bind; top -bHU bind last pid: 21738; load averages: 0.02, 0.20, 0.27 up 12+18:08:5310:39:45 56 processes: 1 running, 55 sleeping Mem: 207M Active, 1494M Inact, 223M Wired, 70M Cache, 112M Buf, 4700K Free Swap: 2048M Total, 12K Used, 2048M Free PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND 979 bind8 440 52576K 44652K select 1 9:42 0.00% named ==^^ last pid: 21739; load averages: 0.02, 0.20, 0.27 up 12+18:08:5310:39:45 56 processes: 1 running, 55 sleeping Mem: 207M Active, 1494M Inact, 223M Wired, 70M Cache, 112M Buf, 4712K Free Swap: 2048M Total, 12K Used, 2048M Free PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND 979 bind 440 52576K 44652K select 1 9:42 0.00% named 979 bind 440 52576K 44652K ucond 1 5:52 0.00% named 979 bind 440 52576K 44652K ucond 0 5:51 0.00% named 979 bind 440 52576K 44652K ucond 0 5:50 0.00% named 979 bind 440 52576K 44652K ucond 1 5:49 0.00% named 979 bind 440 52576K 44652K ucond 1 5:48 0.00% named 979 bind 440 52576K 44652K ucond 1 0:16 0.00% named 979 bind 200 52576K 44652K sigwai 1 0:00 0.00% named # ps -aHx | grep 979; echo ;ps -ax | grep 979 979 ?? Is 0:00.01 /usr/sbin/named -n 5 -t /var/named -u bind 979 ?? Ss 5:49.41 /usr/sbin/named -n 5 -t /var/named -u bind 979 ?? Ss 5:50.73 /usr/sbin/named -n 5 -t /var/named -u bind 979 ?? Ss 5:50.36 /usr/sbin/named -n 5 -t /var/named -u bind 979 ?? Ss 5:52.14 /usr/sbin/named -n 5 -t /var/named -u bind 979 ?? Ss 5:48.15 /usr/sbin/named -n 5 -t /var/named -u bind 979 ?? Ss 0:15.69 /usr/sbin/named -n 5 -t /var
Re: top incorrectly reporting process time
Kris Kennaway wrote: Ott Köstner wrote: Here is the problem. top returns only 9:42 -- the time of the first thread. ps returns the sum of the thread times, which is correct. OK, I thought you were claiming the numbers were completely unrelated. Yeah, top and ps are just reporting different things (runtime of one thread vs total runtime of all threads). top may have a configuration option about aggregating the thread runtimes, or it may require a source code change. Kris Now I understand -- there are actually 2 separate problems -- one with top code, which is the same on all systems and another porblem wihth ps on two amd64 machines I am running: First computer FreeBSD 7.1-PRERELEASE #2 (exact copy / paste) : # ps -ax|grep mysql; echo; ps -axH|grep mysql 981 con- IW 0:00.00 /bin/sh /usr/local/bin/mysqld_safe --defaults-extra-file=/var/db/mysql/my.c 1019 con- S 98:00.87 /usr/local/libexec/mysqld --defaults-extra-file=/var/db/mysql/my.cnf --base 12266 p0 S+ 0:00.00 grep mysql 981 con- IW 0:00.00 /bin/sh /usr/local/bin/mysqld_safe --defaults-extra-file=/var/db/mysql/my.c 1019 con- S 0:01.21 /usr/local/libexec/mysqld --defaults-extra-file=/var/db/mysql/my.cnf --base 1019 con- S 0:00.11 /usr/local/libexec/mysqld --defaults-extra-file=/var/db/mysql/my.cnf --base 1019 con- I 3:13.38 /usr/local/libexec/mysqld --defaults-extra-file=/var/db/mysql/my.cnf --base 1019 con- I 0:00.08 /usr/local/libexec/mysqld --defaults-extra-file=/var/db/mysql/my.cnf --base 1019 con- S 0:00.02 /usr/local/libexec/mysqld --defaults-extra-file=/var/db/mysql/my.cnf --base 12268 p0 R+ 0:00.00 grep mysql 3.xx minutes seems to be correct here, not 98. Second computer FreeBSD 7.1-PRERELEASE #3 (exact copy / paste): # ps -ax|grep mysql; echo; ps -axH|grep mysql 1015 con- I 0:00.01 /bin/sh /usr/local/bin/mysqld_safe --defaults-extra-file=/var/db/mysql/my.c 1079 con- S582:49.60 [mysqld] 1015 con- I 0:00.01 /bin/sh /usr/local/bin/mysqld_safe --defaults-extra-file=/var/db/mysql/my.c 1079 con- S 2:00.40 [mysqld] 1079 con- I 0:00.00 [mysqld] 1079 con- I 0:01.32 [mysqld] 1079 con- I 0:47.04 [mysqld] 1079 con- I 0:03.56 [mysqld] 1079 con- S 0:26.43 [mysqld] 1079 con- S 3:13.97 [mysqld] 1079 con- S 4:12.72 [mysqld] 1079 con- S 0:03.72 [mysqld] 582 minutes is clearly wrong. Sincerely, O.K. -- Testi oma Interneti kiirust / Test Your Internet speed: http://speedtest.zzz.ee/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: top incorrectly reporting process time
Mel wrote: On Friday 28 November 2008 11:52:26 Ott Köstner wrote: Second computer FreeBSD 7.1-PRERELEASE #3 (exact copy / paste): # ps -ax|grep mysql; echo; ps -axH|grep mysql 1015 con- I 0:00.01 /bin/sh /usr/local/bin/mysqld_safe --defaults-extra-file=/var/db/mysql/my.c 1079 con- S582:49.60 [mysqld] 1015 con- I 0:00.01 /bin/sh /usr/local/bin/mysqld_safe --defaults-extra-file=/var/db/mysql/my.c 1079 con- S 2:00.40 [mysqld] 1079 con- I 0:00.00 [mysqld] 1079 con- I 0:01.32 [mysqld] 1079 con- I 0:47.04 [mysqld] 1079 con- I 0:03.56 [mysqld] 1079 con- S 0:26.43 [mysqld] 1079 con- S 3:13.97 [mysqld] 1079 con- S 4:12.72 [mysqld] 1079 con- S 0:03.72 [mysqld] 582 minutes is clearly wrong. Not if it's the sum of all threads that lived and died during the lifetime of the process. It's value is taken from the kernel's idea of the runtime. With KERN_PROC_INC_THREAD set, it will look at the thread storage for active threads, including the 'main()' thread. I haven't looked into detail, but I suspect when a thread dies it gets added to process runtime, and is stored nowhere else. I see. Thank You! Aside from the different machines, you also took 2 different daemons, which fits this: named uses a static thread pool, by design, sum(nthreads) will equal the process time mysqld uses a dynamic thread pool, sum(nthreads) is really sum(nthreads_active). I haven't looked into detail I see. Regards, O.K. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Limewire package install error
Fbsd1 wrote: Tried to pkg_add -r limewire. Dependant diablo-jdk-1.6.0.07.02.tbz File unavailable. The package diablo-jdk is not on 7.0 or 7.1 pkg server. Looking up diablo-jdk on the ports website, the long description points to here http://www.freebsdfoundation.org/downloads/java.shtml Just tried to install from ports. Try to install diablo-jdk first from ports. There is a file tzupdater-1_3_9-2008g.zip which should be downloaded directly from Sun, first creating your personal account @Sun. If diablo-jdk is OK, Limewire should be no problem. Check: # pkg_version -v|grep diablo diablo-jdk-1.6.0.07.02_2= up-to-date with port - # cd /usr/ports/net-p2p/limewire # make === Vulnerability check disabled, database not found = LimeWireOther.zip doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/. = Attempting to fetch from http://www10.limewire.com/download/. LimeWireOther.zip 100% of9 MB 315 kBps 00m00s === Extracting for limewire-4.18.8,1 = MD5 Checksum OK for LimeWireOther.zip. = SHA256 Checksum OK for LimeWireOther.zip. === limewire-4.18.8,1 depends on executable: unzip - found === Patching for limewire-4.18.8,1 === Configuring for limewire-4.18.8,1 # make install === Installing for limewire-4.18.8,1 === limewire-4.18.8,1 depends on executable: java - found === limewire-4.18.8,1 depends on file: /usr/local/diablo-jdk1.6.0/bin/java - found === Generating temporary packing list === Checking if net-p2p/limewire already installed install -o root -g wheel -m 555 /usr/ports/net-p2p/limewire/work/limewire.sh /usr/local/bin/limewire /bin/mkdir -p /usr/local/share/java/limewire /bin/cp -R /usr/ports/net-p2p/limewire/work/LimeWire/* /usr/local/share/java/limewire/ /bin/mkdir -p /usr/local/share/doc/limewire install -o root -g wheel -m 444 /usr/ports/net-p2p/limewire/work/README.txt /usr/local/share/doc/limewire/ === Registering installation for limewire-4.18.8,1 Greetings, O.K. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: top incorrectly reporting process time
Kris Kennaway wrote: Ott Köstner wrote: Jeremy Chadwick wrote: On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 04:34:01PM +0200, Ott Köstner wrote: On several FreeBSD machines I have the following problem: What FreeBSD version? (It matters) 7.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD But I can experience it also on a 7.0 machine. Seems that top reports incorrectly processes with multiple threads. $ top -bUbind last pid: 21635; load averages: 0.73, 0.46, 0.29 up 1+00:17:18 16:48:10 54 processes: 1 running, 53 sleeping Mem: 66M Active, 1174M Inact, 204M Wired, 36K Cache, 112M Buf, 555M Free Swap: 2048M Total, 2048M Free PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND 979 bind8 440 40288K 32916K select 0 0:16 0.00% named $ ps -ax|grep 979 979 ?? Ss 1:11.26 /usr/sbin/named -n 5 -t /var/named -u bind Check top -H to display the statistics for individual threads. Kris # top -bUmysql last pid: 8336; load averages: 0.33, 0.30, 0.24 up 13+22:36:29 08:47:07 157 processes: 1 running, 156 sleeping Mem: 1163M Active, 2058M Inact, 555M Wired, 160M Cache, 214M Buf, 22M Free Swap: 4096M Total, 432K Used, 4095M Free PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND 1079 mysql 9 200 92316K 70472K sigwai 1 0:04 0.00% mysqld 1015 mysql 1 80 7056K 1332K wait 1 0:00 0.00% sh - # top -bHUmysql last pid: 8497; load averages: 0.36, 0.32, 0.25 up 13+22:37:43 08:48:21 148 processes: 4 running, 144 sleeping Mem: 1147M Active, 2068M Inact, 554M Wired, 156M Cache, 214M Buf, 32M Free Swap: 4096M Total, 432K Used, 4095M Free PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND 1079 mysql 440 92316K 70472K select 0 4:10 0.00% mysqld 1079 mysql 440 92316K 70472K select 0 3:12 0.00% mysqld 1079 mysql 440 92316K 70472K select 1 1:59 0.00% mysqld 1079 mysql 440 92316K 70472K ucond 0 0:47 0.00% mysqld 1079 mysql 440 92316K 70472K select 0 0:26 0.00% mysqld 1079 mysql 200 92316K 70472K sigwai 1 0:04 0.00% mysqld 1079 mysql 440 92316K 70472K ucond 0 0:04 0.00% mysqld 1079 mysql 440 92316K 70472K ucond 1 0:01 0.00% mysqld 1015 mysql 80 7056K 1332K wait 1 0:00 0.00% sh 1079 mysql 440 92316K 70472K ucond 0 0:00 0.00% mysqld -- # ps -ax|grep 1079 1079 con- S576:13.90 [mysqld] -- # ps -aHx|grep 1079 1079 con- S 1:58.71 [mysqld] 1079 con- I 0:00.00 [mysqld] 1079 con- S 0:01.30 [mysqld] 1079 con- I 0:46.72 [mysqld] 1079 con- S 0:03.51 [mysqld] 1079 con- S 0:26.05 [mysqld] 1079 con- S 3:11.80 [mysqld] 1079 con- S 4:09.88 [mysqld] 1079 con- S 0:03.67 [mysqld] Strange? Greetings, O.K. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mysqld_multi missing after mysql50-server install
Valentin Bud wrote: And of course if there are other possibilities to run 2 mysqld instances on one server please let me know. There is no limit, how many instances of mysqld you can run. Just specify different database directories and sockets for each instance. Something like that: $ mysqld --datadir=your sql instance dada dir --socket=/tmp/your socket ... There is no need to run mysqld as root (and better not do that). Just any regular user is OK for mysqld. Greetings, O.K. -- Testi oma Interneti kiirust / Test Your Internet speed: http://speedtest.zzz.ee/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: firewall rules for bitlord, yahoo, limewire
dick hoogendijk wrote: I know, I'm cynical here, but limewire is not all bad! ...and, BTW, Limewire port is readily available for FreeBSD: http://cvsweb.freebsd.org/ports/net-p2p/limewire LimeWire is a fast, easy-to-use file sharing program that contains no spyware, adware or other bundled software. Compatible with all major platforms and running over the Gnutella network, LimeWire's open source code http://www.limewire.org/, is freely available to the public and developed in part by a devoted programmer community... http://www.limewire.com/about/ Greetings! O.K. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Transparent Proxy with IPFW + Squid 2.7
Cagri Ersen wrote: I want to configure a transparent proxy with IPFW and Squid. I enabled IPFW on a FreeBSD 7.0 and also install squid 2.7 I am running such a setup, but with pf. Works fine. Maybe it heplps pf rule I am using: demo=dc0 rdr on $demo proto tcp from any to any port 80 - 127.0.0.1 port 3128 Squid config file # Squid normally listens to port 3128 http_port 127.0.0.1:3128 transparent Greetings, O.K. -- Testi oma Interneti kiirust / Test Your Internet speed: http://speedtest.zzz.ee/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Transparent Proxy with IPFW + Squid 2.7
Cagri Ersen wrote: I want to configure a transparent proxy with IPFW and Squid. I enabled IPFW on a FreeBSD 7.0 and also install squid 2.7 I am running such a setup, but with pf. Works fine. Maybe it heplps pf rule I am using: demo=dc0 rdr on $demo proto tcp from any to any port 80 - 127.0.0.1 port 3128 Squid config file # Squid normally listens to port 3128 http_port 127.0.0.1:3128 transparent Greetings, O.K. -- Testi oma Interneti kiirust / Test Your Internet speed: http://speedtest.zzz.ee/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Transparent Proxy with IPFW + Squid 2.7
Ott Köstner wrote: Cagri Ersen wrote: I want to configure a transparent proxy with IPFW and Squid. I enabled IPFW on a FreeBSD 7.0 and also install squid 2.7 I am running such a setup, but with pf. Works fine. Maybe it helps Oh, before compiling Squid, in Squid port directory: # make config ? ?[X] SQUID_IPFW Enable transparent proxying with IPFW ? ? ? ?[X] SQUID_PF Enable transparent proxying with PF pf rule I am using: demo=dc0 rdr on $demo proto tcp from any to any port 80 - 127.0.0.1 port 3128 Squid config file # Squid normally listens to port 3128 http_port 127.0.0.1:3128 transparent Greetings, O.K. -- Testi oma Interneti kiirust / Test Your Internet speed: http://speedtest.zzz.ee/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Can't locate ExtUtils/MakeMaker.pm
Noah Garrett Wallach wrote: Hi List, Okay I am unable to figure out how to get out of this loop. I try to build p5-Module-Install and the result error is Can't locate ExtUtils/MakeMaker.pm when I attempt to build p5-ExtUtils-MakeMaker I cant because the module needs ExtUtils/Install.pm Just experimented -- looks good here. Make just completes in few seconds. Maybe this helps. This is how it shoult look like... # cd /usr/ports/devel/p5-Module-Install # make === Vulnerability check disabled, database not found === Extracting for p5-Module-Install-0.77 = MD5 Checksum OK for Module-Install-0.77.tar.gz. = SHA256 Checksum OK for Module-Install-0.77.tar.gz. === p5-Module-Install-0.77 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/perl5.8.8 - found === Patching for p5-Module-Install-0.77 === p5-Module-Install-0.77 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/perl5.8.8 - found === p5-Module-Install-0.77 depends on file: /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/Archive/Tar.pm - found === p5-Module-Install-0.77 depends on file: /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/Module/ScanDeps.pm - found === p5-Module-Install-0.77 depends on file: /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/Module/CoreList.pm - found === p5-Module-Install-0.77 depends on file: /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/Module/Build.pm - found === p5-Module-Install-0.77 depends on file: /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/PAR/Dist.pm - found === p5-Module-Install-0.77 depends on file: /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/YAML/Tiny.pm - found === p5-Module-Install-0.77 depends on file: /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/ExtUtils/ParseXS.pm - found === p5-Module-Install-0.77 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/perl5.8.8 - found === p5-Module-Install-0.77 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/perl5.8.8 - found === Configuring for p5-Module-Install-0.77 Checking if your kit is complete... Looks good Warning: prerequisite ExtUtils::Install 1.50 not found. We have 1.33. Warning: prerequisite File::Remove 1.40 not found. Writing Makefile for Module::Install === Building for p5-Module-Install-0.77 cp lib/Module/Install/Admin/Bundle.pm blib/lib/Module/Install/Admin/Bundle.pm cp lib/Module/Install/AutoInstall.pm blib/lib/Module/Install/AutoInstall.pm cp lib/Module/Install/With.pm blib/lib/Module/Install/With.pm cp lib/Module/Install/Run.pm blib/lib/Module/Install/Run.pm cp lib/Module/Install/Can.pm blib/lib/Module/Install/Can.pm cp lib/Module/Install/Admin.pm blib/lib/Module/Install/Admin.pm cp lib/Module/Install/PAR.pm blib/lib/Module/Install/PAR.pm cp lib/Module/Install/Fetch.pm blib/lib/Module/Install/Fetch.pm cp lib/Module/Install/Admin/Compiler.pm blib/lib/Module/Install/Admin/Compiler.pm cp lib/Module/Install/Admin/ScanDeps.pm blib/lib/Module/Install/Admin/ScanDeps.pm cp lib/Module/Install/Deprecated.pm blib/lib/Module/Install/Deprecated.pm cp lib/Module/Install/Admin/Find.pm blib/lib/Module/Install/Admin/Find.pm cp lib/Module/Install/Metadata.pm blib/lib/Module/Install/Metadata.pm cp lib/Module/Install/Bundle.pm blib/lib/Module/Install/Bundle.pm cp lib/Module/Install/Makefile.pm blib/lib/Module/Install/Makefile.pm cp lib/inc/Module/Install.pm blib/lib/inc/Module/Install.pm cp lib/Module/Install/Admin/WriteAll.pm blib/lib/Module/Install/Admin/WriteAll.pm cp lib/Module/Install/Compiler.pm blib/lib/Module/Install/Compiler.pm cp lib/Module/Install.pm blib/lib/Module/Install.pm cp lib/Module/Install/Include.pm blib/lib/Module/Install/Include.pm cp lib/Module/Install/WriteAll.pm blib/lib/Module/Install/WriteAll.pm cp lib/Module/AutoInstall.pm blib/lib/Module/AutoInstall.pm cp lib/Module/Install/External.pm blib/lib/Module/Install/External.pm cp lib/Module/Install/Win32.pm blib/lib/Module/Install/Win32.pm cp lib/Module/Install/Admin/Include.pm blib/lib/Module/Install/Admin/Include.pm cp lib/Module/Install/Admin/Makefile.pm blib/lib/Module/Install/Admin/Makefile.pm cp lib/Module/Install/Share.pm blib/lib/Module/Install/Share.pm cp lib/Module/Install/Admin/Manifest.pm blib/lib/Module/Install/Admin/Manifest.pm cp lib/Module/Install/Base.pm blib/lib/Module/Install/Base.pm cp lib/Module/Install/Admin/Metadata.pm blib/lib/Module/Install/Admin/Metadata.pm cp lib/Module/Install/MakeMaker.pm blib/lib/Module/Install/MakeMaker.pm cp lib/Module/Install/Inline.pm blib/lib/Module/Install/Inline.pm cp lib/Module/Install/Philosophy.pod blib/lib/Module/Install/Philosophy.pod cp lib/Module/Install.pod blib/lib/Module/Install.pod Installing blib/lib/auto/share/dist/Module-Install/dist_file.txt Manifying blib/man3/Module::Install::With.3 Manifying blib/man3/Module::Install::Bundle.3 Manifying blib/man3/Module::Install::Makefile.3 Manifying blib/man3/inc::Module::Install.3 Manifying blib/man3/Module::Install::Compiler.3 Manifying blib/man3/Module::AutoInstall.3 Manifying blib/man3/Module::Install::Can.3 Manifying blib/man3/Module::Install::Admin.3 Manifying blib/man3/Module::Install::PAR.3 Manifying blib/man3/Module::Install::External.3 Manifying
Re: Xeon Quad Core (Was: Server Freezing Solid)
Chris Maness wrote: Since a Xeon Quad Core is a 64bit processor, would it work ok with FreeBSD? Or would the adm64 release be better for that chip? I would recommend using amd64 FreeBSD port in this case. Some applications are significantly faster in 64 bit mode than in 32 bit mode. Personally, I am useing amd64 FreeBSD on several Intel machines. Very good indeed. Greetings, O.K. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: snmpd strangeness
John Almberg wrote: If not, how would I find the driver info? Typical line in fstab: /dev/mfid0s1a / ufs rw 1 1 Hey! # mount to see what is mounted # sysctl dev.mfi to see mfi information I am using mfi in one of my systems. Mfi is LSI MegaSAS. Very good and fast raid controller, but unfortunatelly without management software for BSD. :) O.K. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Help! (Re: 7.1)
Ott Köstner wrote: I had my workstation running 7.0-STABLE. Perfectly well till today. Now I compiled and installed the latest 7.1-PRERELEASE and now Thunderbird and Firefox got really SLOW. Everything works, but Xorg is consuming time constatnly. Scrolling inbox is especially slow. Asked the question and... answering it by my self... ;) Seems that rebuiding Nvidia 'Quadro4 380 XGL' driver solved the problem. Could it be? Anyway, it's OK now. I also rebuilt the Thunderbird. Greetings, O.K. -- Testi oma Interneti kiirust / Test Your Internet speed: http://speedtest.zzz.ee/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 7.1
Manolis Kiagias wrote: I don't think it is a matter of days, we have not even reached RC status yet on 7.1 On a production server you will probably wish to go with 7.0-RELEASE-p5. It would be trivial to upgrade to 7.1 by means of freebsd-update(8) when it is released. You probably don't want to risk 7.1-PRERELEASE on a server, but for anyone running workstations, desktops, laptops I think it is worth trying at this moment. I am a person, who made a mistake, installing 7.1 on my production server (actually RELENG_7 stable, which shows up as 7.1). My question is, how stupid is that mistake? Is it better to reinstall 7.0 before something really bad happens, or can I just let it run? What are the most serious bugs to expect? Greetings, O.K. -- Testi oma Interneti kiirust / Test Your Internet speed: http://speedtest.zzz.ee/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 7.1
Manolis Kiagias wrote: Ott Köstner wrote: Manolis Kiagias wrote: I don't think it is a matter of days, we have not even reached RC status yet on 7.1 On a production server you will probably wish to go with 7.0-RELEASE-p5. It would be trivial to upgrade to 7.1 by means of freebsd-update(8) when it is released. You probably don't want to risk 7.1-PRERELEASE on a server, but for anyone running workstations, desktops, laptops I think it is worth trying at this moment. I am a person, who made a mistake, installing 7.1 on my production server (actually RELENG_7 stable, which shows up as 7.1). My question is, how stupid is that mistake? Is it better to reinstall 7.0 before something really bad happens, or can I just let it run? What are the most serious bugs to expect? Greetings, O.K. It all depends on the programs you run, your configuration, system load and so on. Bugs that may be present in the system, may simply not be applicable to you, if you are not using the specific part or feature that has the problem. While it is difficult to assess without knowing specific details, I think 7.1 is generally stable at the moment. Maybe people using it in production servers (if any) can step in and share their experiences. I have just regular internet things running: apache22, mysql5, bind94, php5, postfix, dovecot, proftpd, clamav, spamassasin, snmpd... ...plus ipfw and pf Actually there is one strange thing what I described here before -- 'top' reporting incorrect process times. But this appeared already when I upgraded from FreBSD 6.3 to 7.0. The bug appears on all 7.++ machines, i386 and amd64. Everything is OK with single-threaded processes, but processes with multiple threades are reported incorrectly by top. Anybody else has experienced this? Also, there was a strange phenomenon with FreeBSD router with pf. the rule in question is: 'scrub in all' I do not knw, if this has anything to do with 7.1 issue. Maybe it is not just a good idea to have a 'scrub' rule on router... Greetings, O.K. -- Testi oma Interneti kiirust / Test Your Internet speed: http://speedtest.zzz.ee/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 7.1
Jeremy Chadwick wrote: On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 02:49:26PM +0200, Ott Köstner wrote: Also, there was a strange phenomenon with FreeBSD router with pf. the rule in question is: 'scrub in all' I do not knw, if this has anything to do with 7.1 issue. Maybe it is not just a good idea to have a 'scrub' rule on router... No, it's perfectly fine. But your description of the problem is too terse, and the issue should be discussed on freebsd-pf not here. OK. Thank you! Will subscribe to pf list. Just to finish this talk, the problem was with 'pop3s' protocol. Removing 'scrub' rule from firewall made it work perfectly well... There *are* other problems with pf which have been fixed in RELENG_7 (7.1), and you can review my Wiki to see what those are. ...and what is the address of this Wiki? Greetings, O.K. -- Testi oma Interneti kiirust / Test Your Internet speed: http://speedtest.zzz.ee/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Help! (Re: 7.1)
Manolis Kiagias wrote: You probably don't want to risk 7.1-PRERELEASE on a server, but for anyone running workstations, desktops, laptops I think it is worth trying at this moment. Hi! I had my workstation running 7.0-STABLE. Perfectly well till today. Now I compiled and installed the latest 7.1-PRERELEASE and now Thunderbird and Firefox got really SLOW. Everything works, but Xorg is consuming time constatnly. Scrolling inbox is especially slow. Recompile Xorg, Thunderbird??? Any help available? CPU: 6.8% user, 0.0% nice, 10.9% system, 0.4% interrupt, 82.0% idle Mem: 329M Active, 310M Inact, 139M Wired, 2696K Cache, 112M Buf, 1214M Free Swap: 2000M Total, 2000M Free PID USERNAMETHR PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND 998 root 1 610 239M 160M select 0 5:42 16.36% Xorg 11866 ott 3 960 75596K 66008K ucond 0 0:00 8.40% opera 9280 ott 7 440 76156K 62604K ucond 0 0:00 0.98% thunderbird-bin Greetings, O.K. -- Testi oma Interneti kiirust / Test Your Internet speed: http://speedtest.zzz.ee/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
top incorrectly reporting process time
Hello, On several FreeBSD machines I have the following problem: # top -bUmysql last pid: 99112; load averages: 0.22, 0.12, 0.09 up 2+06:07:05 16:17:43 132 processes: 1 running, 131 sleeping Mem: 718M Active, 2494M Inact, 455M Wired, 77M Cache, 214M Buf, 213M Free Swap: 4096M Total, 4096M Free PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND 1079 mysql 9 200 81564K 60268K sigwai 1 0:01 0.00% mysqld ^^^ 1015 mysql 1 80 7056K 1368K wait 1 0:00 0.00% sh However mysqld time is actually # ps -ax|grep mysql 1015 con- I 0:00.01 /bin/sh /usr/local/bin/mysqld_safe --defaults-extra-file=/var/db/mysql/my.cnf 1079 con- S 70:03.64 [mysqld] ^^^ 99156 p0 S+ 0:00.00 grep mysql Anyone who can explain this? With greetings, Ott Köstner ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
top incorrectly reporting process time
Hello, On several FreeBSD machines I have the following problem: # top -bUmysql last pid: 99112; load averages: 0.22, 0.12, 0.09 up 2+06:07:05 16:17:43 132 processes: 1 running, 131 sleeping Mem: 718M Active, 2494M Inact, 455M Wired, 77M Cache, 214M Buf, 213M Free Swap: 4096M Total, 4096M Free PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND 1079 mysql 9 200 81564K 60268K sigwai 1 0:01 0.00% mysqld ^^^ 1015 mysql 1 80 7056K 1368K wait 1 0:00 0.00% sh However mysqld time is actually # ps -ax|grep mysql 1015 con- I 0:00.01 /bin/sh /usr/local/bin/mysqld_safe --defaults-extra-file=/var/db/mysql/my.cnf 1079 con- S 70:03.64 [mysqld] ^^^ 99156 p0 S+ 0:00.00 grep mysql Anyone who can explain this? With greetings, Ott Köstner ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: top incorrectly reporting process time
Jeremy Chadwick wrote: On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 04:34:01PM +0200, Ott Köstner wrote: On several FreeBSD machines I have the following problem: What FreeBSD version? (It matters) 7.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD But I can experience it also on a 7.0 machine. Seems that top reports incorrectly processes with multiple threads. $ top -bUbind last pid: 21635; load averages: 0.73, 0.46, 0.29 up 1+00:17:18 16:48:10 54 processes: 1 running, 53 sleeping Mem: 66M Active, 1174M Inact, 204M Wired, 36K Cache, 112M Buf, 555M Free Swap: 2048M Total, 2048M Free PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND 979 bind8 440 40288K 32916K select 0 0:16 0.00% named $ ps -ax|grep 979 979 ?? Ss 1:11.26 /usr/sbin/named -n 5 -t /var/named -u bind # top -bUmysql last pid: 99112; load averages: 0.22, 0.12, 0.09 up 2+06:07:05 16:17:43 132 processes: 1 running, 131 sleeping Mem: 718M Active, 2494M Inact, 455M Wired, 77M Cache, 214M Buf, 213M Free Swap: 4096M Total, 4096M Free PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND 1079 mysql 9 200 81564K 60268K sigwai 1 0:01 0.00% mysqld ^^^ 1015 mysql 1 80 7056K 1368K wait 1 0:00 0.00% sh However mysqld time is actually # ps -ax|grep mysql 1015 con- I 0:00.01 /bin/sh /usr/local/bin/mysqld_safe --defaults-extra-file=/var/db/mysql/my.cnf 1079 con- S 70:03.64 [mysqld] ^^^ 99156 p0 S+ 0:00.00 grep mysql Anyone who can explain this? Does the behaviour change if you mount /proc? (This would mainly apply to RELENG_6 and earlier only) procfs on /proc (procfs, local) No. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
