Re: Saving scanned document
On Tue, 23 Jul 2013 16:35:40 -0400 Jerry je...@seibercom.net wrote: On Tue, 23 Jul 2013 15:50:00 -0400 Lowell Gilbert articulated: Jerry je...@seibercom.net writes: Does anyone know of a way of getting the scanner to see the FreeBSD machine and saving a file to it? I'm not sure I correctly understand your intention, but maybe Samba is what you're looking for? Samba is working fine and all of the other computers on the network can see each other and the printer/scanner. The problem is that the scanner does not see the FreeBSD machine. Jerry; Doesn't Brother printers have a webpage where you can scan from it? At least that's what the HP I have does. Any computer on the network can access this page and scan from it. Including my BSD. -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Firefox is so slow
On Tue, 30 Apr 2013 14:08:55 -0500 Edwin L. Culp W. edwinlc...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks for your comment. I agree that firefox is intermittently slow or stop. Which do you use? I tend to use chromium although I still will probably go back to firefox unless chrome becomes a bit more firefox like. thanks ed Just barging in the thread to post my numbers. FBSD 8.3 AMD64 - 16G RAM - Phenom II 975 quad - SATA II disks NVIDA 9800 GT KDE 4.8.4 / Qt 4.8.2 Firefox ESR 17.0.2 with: Addons: BYTubeD DoNotTrackMe DownloadHelper FlashBlock HTTPSEverywhere NoScript Noia4 Theme Plugins: Default Pligin Helix RealPlayer IcedTea-Web Flash 11.2 r202 Time to load: 4 seconds -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Firefox is so slow
On Tue, 30 Apr 2013 21:01:39 -0300 Mario Lobo l...@bsd.com.br wrote: On Tue, 30 Apr 2013 14:08:55 -0500 Edwin L. Culp W. edwinlc...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks for your comment. I agree that firefox is intermittently slow or stop. Which do you use? I tend to use chromium although I still will probably go back to firefox unless chrome becomes a bit more firefox like. thanks ed Just barging in the thread to post my numbers. FBSD 8.3 AMD64 - 16G RAM - Phenom II 975 quad - SATA II disks NVIDA 9800 GT KDE 4.8.4 / Qt 4.8.2 Firefox ESR 17.0.2 with: Addons: BYTubeD DoNotTrackMe DownloadHelper FlashBlock HTTPSEverywhere NoScript Noia4 Theme Plugins: Default Pligin Helix RealPlayer IcedTea-Web Flash 11.2 r202 Time to load: 4 seconds 2 things I forgot to mention - I have 47 TABs opened - If I close it and open it again, it only takes 2 seconds to load. -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Booting Problem
On Mon, 28 Jan 2013 15:16:14 -0800 Doug Hardie bc...@lafn.org wrote: I have a relatively old machine that I am trying to boot 9.1 on. The bios will not boot from USB stick. I am using an external CD drive. It starts the boot process fine and gets to the Bootstrap loader message with revision 1.1. Then it puts out the machine, date, time the CD was created and starts the spinner. It spins around about 2 times and stops. The system continues to read from the drive for another couple minutes. Then everything stops. Nothing more happens. The CD is good. I can boot it just fine using the same external drive on another machine. While I could remove the drive and temporarily mount in in the working machine and build it there, I would like to find a way to successfully boot from CD. This will become a remote machine and taking it apart later is not a viable option. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org Can you boot a different OS (Win, Ububtu, gparted, etc ...) from the same drive on the same machine? -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: OSS and ALSA
On Mon, 21 Jan 2013 19:12:34 +0100 David Demelier demelier.da...@gmail.com wrote: On 21/01/2013 17:23, Oliver Lehmann wrote: Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org wrote: Yes, SDL Output works fine. I think that this should be the default for the following reasons: - unlike OSS4 it doesn't require an additional external kernel driver - unlike PulseAudio it doesn't require any daemon (and possibly extra configuration) - unlike ALSA OSS plugin, SDL code is sane in its usage of OSS API The real OSS support was dropped by audacious somewhere in the past and is unfortunally no longer available. I can switch the default from OSS4 to SDL if this is what the community wants - I have no hard feeling here. Yes I think this is a better solution, OSSv4 is an huge port that must *replace* the in-kernel mixer/soundcard support. Cheers, David ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org Could one of you show the steps to set SDL as the default sound system on FBSD instead of OSS? Thanks, -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Is csup still working?
Hi; I have 8-STABLE and I just did, csup -L 2 src-supfile with *default host=cvsup.FreeBSD.org *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_8 and it finished with: Edit src/usr.sbin/zzz/zzz.sh Add delta 1.2.32.2 2012.11.17.10.37.28 svnexp Shutting down connection to server Finished successfully Can I trust this update to be correct, with the latest sources? Thanks, -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: virtualbox with FreeBSD as host
On Sun, 18 Nov 2012 20:07:44 -0500 Fbsd8 fb...@a1poweruser.com wrote: Snip ... So how can I run rpd on the freebsd host running the virtualbox server system so I can access the configured vm? I this configuration even possible? I'll give it one last shot. CREATE/RUNNING ACCESSING ! CREATE/RUN guests needs X11 ? NO ! ACCESSING guests needs X11 ? Depends on the guest. a) Guest = Consele head OS (FBSD, Lunux, etc..) = No need for x11/graphics on the local host or any other remote accessing host. b) Guest = Graphic head OS (windose, any *NIX w/ a graphic interface, Macs, etc..) = Yes, You will need x11 or some form of graphic interface running on the local host or any other remote accessing host. I hope this puts an end to it. -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: virtualbox with FreeBSD as host
On Sat, 17 Nov 2012 01:10:23 -0800 per...@pluto.rain.com wrote: Adam Vande More amvandem...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 3:18 PM, Fbsd8 fb...@a1poweruser.com wrote: I do not run x11 or any desktop on my 9.0 host. This would be your problem. How so? Surely virtualbox _should_ be able to hand off a VT to the XP guest, for it to use as a keyboard, mouse, and display. (This supposes that the FreeBSD box in question _has_ a keyboard, mouse, and display, and thus has a VT that it can hand off.) Fbsd8 fbsd8 at a1poweruser.com wrote: I have 9.0 installed on my 200gb hard drive, it's configured to use the first 100gb leaving the second 100gb free. I was going to install XP in the second half and have a duel boot config. Then I find out XP has to be install first on the HD ... The easiest solution might be to dd the first 100gb (containing the FreeBSD installation) to the second 100gb, mark the first 100gb as unused, and install XP there if it needs to be in the lowest- addressed part of the disk. Back up the FreeBSD installation first! Mario Lobo l...@bsd.com.br wrote: To access the XP graphics interface, you NEED a graphics environment! XP itself, when running directly on the hardware, provides its own graphics environment. It also does that when running on a VM but it does not provide a graphics environment for the host. It should be able to do the same running on a VM with a virtualized keyboard, mouse, and display. To show a window you need a display that can show it, be it head or headless. To diaplay a head, be it local or remote, the display must be able to handle graphics to properly show the VM screen (head), and like I said, I have no idea on how to do that on a text console screen. -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: virtualbox with FreeBSD as host
On Fri, 16 Nov 2012 09:57:53 -0500 Fbsd8 fb...@a1poweruser.com wrote: Section 23.3 of the handbook speaks about FreeBSD as a host. No where in that section does it say anything about virtualbox running from the FreeBSD host command line or from A Desktop. Do I need a Desktop for virtualbox to run under? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org NOPE !! VBoxHeadless -startvm vm name -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: virtualbox with FreeBSD as host
On Fri, 16 Nov 2012 10:44:54 -0500 Fbsd8 fb...@a1poweruser.com wrote: Mario Lobo wrote: On Fri, 16 Nov 2012 09:57:53 -0500 Fbsd8 fb...@a1poweruser.com wrote: Section 23.3 of the handbook speaks about FreeBSD as a host. No where in that section does it say anything about virtualbox running from the FreeBSD host command line or from A Desktop. Do I need a Desktop for virtualbox to run under? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org NOPE !! VBoxHeadless -startvm vm name Issueing VirtualBox from host command line gets this msg. Failed to open the x11 display VBoxHeadless -startvm vm name assumes that there a vb guest all ready configured which is not my case. There is no man page for VBoxHeadless command. How do a configure a vb guest from the host command line? You can start VirtualBox from an ssh session (with X-forwarding enabled) from you desktop to your desktopless host. Ssh will forward the VBox window to your screen. -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: virtualbox with FreeBSD as host
On Fri, 16 Nov 2012 10:44:54 -0500 Fbsd8 fb...@a1poweruser.com wrote: Mario Lobo wrote: On Fri, 16 Nov 2012 09:57:53 -0500 Fbsd8 fb...@a1poweruser.com wrote: Section 23.3 of the handbook speaks about FreeBSD as a host. No where in that section does it say anything about virtualbox running from the FreeBSD host command line or from A Desktop. Do I need a Desktop for virtualbox to run under? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org NOPE !! VBoxHeadless -startvm vm name Issueing VirtualBox from host command line gets this msg. Failed to open the x11 display VBoxHeadless -startvm vm name assumes that there a vb guest all ready configured which is not my case. Right! I assumed you already had the VM ready. Sorry. There is no man page for VBoxHeadless command. There are those: http://download.virtualbox.org/virtualbox/UserManual.pdf and http://www.virtualbox.org/manual/ VBoxHeadless is covered on both. How do a configure a vb guest from the host command line? VBoxManage can do all that from command line. Check it out or follow my previous e-mail. Sorry for not being more thorough on my last post. -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: virtualbox with FreeBSD as host
On Fri, 16 Nov 2012 16:18:10 -0500 Fbsd8 fb...@a1poweruser.com wrote: Section 23.3 of the handbook speaks about FreeBSD as a host. No where in that section does it say anything about virtualbox running from the FreeBSD host command line or from A Desktop. Do I need a Desktop for virtualbox to run under? NOPE !! VBoxHeadless -startvm vm name Issueing VirtualBox from host command line gets this msg. Failed to open the x11 display VBoxHeadless -startvm vm name assumes that there a vb guest all ready configured which is not my case. Right! I assumed you already had the VM ready. Sorry. There is no man page for VBoxHeadless command. There are those: http://download.virtualbox.org/virtualbox/UserManual.pdf and http://www.virtualbox.org/manual/ VBoxHeadless is covered on both. How do a configure a vb guest from the host command line? VBoxManage can do all that from command line. Check it out or follow my previous e-mail. I read the UserManual and think I am barking up the wrong tree. So lets start over again with what the wanted desired result is. I have 9.0 installed on my 200gb hard drive, it's configured to use the first 100gb leaving the second 100gb free. I was going to install XP in the second half and have a duel boot config. Then I find out XP has to be install first on the HD meaning I have to install 9.0 from scratch again. I read a post on this list where it was suggested to run Virtualbox on my 9.0 host and then run XP as a guest. I want to boot the 9.0 host and login to the 9.0 host, start the Virtualbox XP guest and enter the XP guest [IE: be in the XP OS windows environment], can I do all that from the host command line? I do not run x11 or any desktop on my 9.0 host. I do not want to use an second PC to login to the VB XP guest over ssh. To access the XP graphics interface, you NEED a graphics environment! I, at least, don't know of a way to access a graphics interface from a text console and you're not willing to do an RDP/VNC session from another machine. I'm sorry but you're stuck ! I can't help you any further. -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Firefox install problem
2012/9/4 Warren Block wbl...@wonkity.com
On Tue, 4 Sep 2012, Waitman Gobble wrote:
On Sep 4, 2012 7:03 PM, Mario Lobo l...@bsd.com.br wrote:
All I've done was csup -L 2 ports-supfile with ports-www in it.
Then cd /usr/ports/www/firefox; make with default options.
As for my /etc/make.conf
CPUTYPE?=nocona
OVERRIDE_LINUX_BASE_PORT=f10
OVERRIDE_LINUX_NONBASE_PORTS=f10
WITH_KDE4=yes
WITH_CUPS=yes
WITH_ICONS=KDE4
WITHOUT_GNOME=yes
PYTHON_DEFAULT_VERSION=python2.7
PERL_VERSION=5.10.4
If it is its fault, it will be the first time in around 3,5 years.
did you _only_ csup www in ports? ill have to check but im not sure
libvpx
is in www... im not in a place to check at this exact second but my memory
is that is providing webm support so probably in audio or multimedia
multimedia/libvpx would not have been updated. Selectively updating ports
is not supported. Symlinking libraries to missing versions is often a
source of mysterious problems later.
I had run csup with ports-multimedia since the first libvpx error came up!.
Libvpx was already up to date by the way, and correctly installed. So i did
not Symlink a library to any missing version.
Selectively updating ports is not supported. Then I must wonder why do
we have the option to put ports-{$port} inside the supfile, and not a
mandatory ports-all.
@Jan
~]ident /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.gecko.mk
/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.gecko.mk:
$FreeBSD: ports/Mk/bsd.gecko.mk,v 1.63 2012/07/26 23:12:19 flo Exp $
As far as I could find, this seems to be the latest version.
--
Mario Lobo
http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br
FreeBSD since version 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99,7% winfoes FREE)
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [SOLVED] Firefox install problem
2012/9/5 Jan Beich jbe...@tormail.org Mario Lobo l...@bsd.com.br writes: @Jan ~]ident /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.gecko.mk /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.gecko.mk: $FreeBSD: ports/Mk/bsd.gecko.mk,v 1.63 2012/07/26 23:12:19 flo Exp $ As far as I could find, this seems to be the latest version. Try another cvsup server or subversion. You nailed it Jan ! I updated bsd.gecko,mk from the link you posted: http://trillian.chruetertee.ch/freebsd-gecko/changeset/951 It solved BOTH problems! (libvpx and the install issue). I deleted the symlink to libvpx.so and compilation/installation went on without a glitch. I tested it with all firefox port versions under www/ and they all went ok. Thanks to all that took the time to help. -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since version 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99,7% winfoes FREE) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Firefox install problem
Hi; env: FBSD 8.3-STABLE AMD64 Firefox 15 port The problem seems to be with the porting itself. The first problem showed up during configure. Libvpx could not be found and configure stops. After examining Config.Log, I found a compiler switch like this: -L/usr/local/lib/nss I made a symlink there to libvpx.so and the port compiled without errors. Then after issuing a make install, this comes up everytime: [Snip] a ./searchplugins/yahoo.xml a ./dictionaries/en-US.aff a ./dictionaries/en-US.dic a ./defaults/pref a ./defaults/pref/channel-prefs.js a ./chrome/icons a ./chrome/icons/default a ./chrome/icons/default/default16.png a ./chrome/icons/default/default32.png a ./chrome/icons/default/default48.png /usr/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla-release/config/nsinstall -D /usr/ports/www/firefox/work/fake/bin rm -f -f /usr/ports/www/firefox/work/fake/bin/firefox ln -s /usr/ports/www/firefox/work/fake/lib/firefox/firefox /usr/ports/www/firefox/work/fake/bin gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla-release/browser/installer' echo 'share/applications/firefox.desktop' /usr/ports/www/firefox/work/plist_files echo @dirrmtry share/applications /usr/ports/www/firefox/work/plist_dirs echo 'share/pixmaps/firefox.png' /usr/ports/www/firefox/work/plist_files /bin/mkdir -p /usr/ports/www/firefox/work/fake/libdata /bin/mv -f /usr/ports/www/firefox/work/fake/lib/pkgconfig /usr/ports/www/firefox/work/fake/libdata/ || true mv: rename /usr/ports/www/firefox/work/fake/lib/pkgconfig to /usr/ports/www/firefox/work/fake/libdata/pkgconfig: No such file or directory /bin/rm -f /usr/ports/www/firefox/work/fake/lib/pkgconfig cd: can't cd to /usr/ports/www/firefox/work/fake/include *** Error code 2 Stop in /usr/ports/www/firefox. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/www/firefox. All the fixes I googled that could relate to this, date back to 2005 the latest,, and none of them helped. I've been trying to fix this for 2 days now and I'm not getting anywhere so I can only hope someone can shed a light on this problem here on the list.. My sincere thanks to whoever points me a direction. -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since version 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99,7% winfoes FREE) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Firefox install problem
2012/9/4 Alexander Kapshuk alexander.kaps...@gmail.com This might help... /usr/ports/UPDATING 20120726: AFFECTS: users of devel/pkg-config AUTHOR: b...@freebsd.org devel/pkg-config has been replaced by devel/pkgconf # portmaster -o devel/pkgconf devel/pkg-config or # portupgrade -fo devel/pkgconf pkg-config-\* pkgng: # pkg set -o devel/pkg-config:devel/pkgconf # pkg install -f devel/pkgconf Thank Alexander but been there, done that. pkg_info | grep pkg pkgconf-0.8.7 pkg-config compatible utility which does not depend on glib -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since version 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99,7% winfoes FREE) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Firefox install problem
First, thanks for replying ! On Tue, 04 Sep 2012 21:14:06 -0400 Lowell Gilbert freebsd-questions-lo...@be-well.ilk.org wrote: Mario Lobo l...@bsd.com.br writes: env: FBSD 8.3-STABLE AMD64 Firefox 15 port The problem seems to be with the porting itself. The first problem showed up during configure. Libvpx could not be found and configure stops. After examining Config.Log, I found a compiler switch like this: -L/usr/local/lib/nss I made a symlink there to libvpx.so and the port compiled without errors. That's an incredibly ugly solution; I can't disagree with that! but hey, the problem was getting to compile correctly and, in the absence of the right knowledge and the presence of need, that did it. if the vpx port were installed correctly, it would have been detected, so you're probably just hiding a real problem. The problem is libvpx.so is CORRECTLY installed under /usr/local/lib/vpx, together with all the other correctly installed libraries on my system so most certainly there is something uglier than my hack here. Then after issuing a make install, this comes up everytime: [Snip] a ./searchplugins/yahoo.xml a ./dictionaries/en-US.aff a ./dictionaries/en-US.dic a ./defaults/pref a ./defaults/pref/channel-prefs.js a ./chrome/icons a ./chrome/icons/default a ./chrome/icons/default/default16.png a ./chrome/icons/default/default32.png /bin/rm -f /usr/ports/www/firefox/work/fake/lib/pkgconfig cd: can't cd to /usr/ports/www/firefox/work/fake/include *** Error code 2 Stop in /usr/ports/www/firefox. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/www/firefox. You've done something really weird (in particular, the work/fake directory would not exist or be referenced in a normal ports installation). Try emptying your /etc/make.conf and starting from scratch. All I've done was csup -L 2 ports-supfile with ports-www in it. Then cd /usr/ports/www/firefox; make with default options. As for my /etc/make.conf CPUTYPE?=nocona OVERRIDE_LINUX_BASE_PORT=f10 OVERRIDE_LINUX_NONBASE_PORTS=f10 WITH_KDE4=yes WITH_CUPS=yes WITH_ICONS=KDE4 WITHOUT_GNOME=yes PYTHON_DEFAULT_VERSION=python2.7 PERL_VERSION=5.10.4 If it is its fault, it will be the first time in around 3,5 years. -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Patent hit - MS goes after Linux - FreeBSD ?
On Mon, 6 Aug 2012 08:16:38 -0400 Jerry je...@seibercom.net wrote: On Sun, 5 Aug 2012 21:43:21 -0300 Mario Lobo articulated: On Sun, 5 Aug 2012 09:33:20 -0400 Jerry je...@seibercom.net wrote: On Sun, 5 Aug 2012 08:48:56 -0400 Robert Huff articulated: [Snip] The socialists still feel they are entitled to something for nothing. Jerry; Forgive me for barging in like this but to me, what your sentence describes is just plain good old greedy people. Patents provided the perfect LEGAL way for these very people to make theirs, an idea that they didn't think of or had the gift/talent to create, as a quickie for profit. The result: Now the long patent arm reaches fruit, seeds and DNA. This means that I can't create a Graviola juice drink (local Brazilian fruit) because a Japanese guy patented the fruit !! How ridiculous did we allowed this to get? Yes you can. You are stating a commonly held incorrect belief. You can always request a license from the patient holder. No one, well no one interested in monetary compensation would patient anything unless they were: ⁽¹⁾ Intended to use the patents in such a way that they would directly profit from it ⁽²⁾ Intended to lease the patent rights or outright sell the patent. Patients protect hard working people who may work years, maybe half their life to come up with a killer idea only to have a douche bag come along and use it sans payments. Interestingly enough, you seem to equate an entity, individual, group or corporation that want to profit off of their work and investment as greedy. I call them entitled. With that said, feel free to develop some great idea and then give it away for nothing. No one, certainly not me, is going to stop you. Discussion moved off-list. -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Patent hit - MS goes after Linux - FreeBSD ?
On Sun, 5 Aug 2012 09:33:20 -0400 Jerry je...@seibercom.net wrote: On Sun, 5 Aug 2012 08:48:56 -0400 Robert Huff articulated: [Snip] The socialists still feel they are entitled to something for nothing. Jerry; Forgive me for barging in like this but to me, what your sentence describes is just plain good old greedy people. Patents provided the perfect LEGAL way for these very people to make theirs, an idea that they didn't think of or had the gift/talent to create, as a quickie for profit. The result: Now the long patent arm reaches fruit, seeds and DNA. This means that I can't create a Graviola juice drink (local Brazilian fruit) because a Japanese guy patented the fruit !! How ridiculous did we allowed this to get? On a final note, if your sentence were to reflect a little better the idea of socialism (at least on paper), it should read: The socialists still feel that everybody is entitled to something for nothing. Unfortunately today, socialism, democracy, communism or liberalism are mere skins for hungry wolves. -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
OT - Squid external connections
Hi; Would anybody know how can I cross-reference squid/Lusca external connections with LAN hosts? For example, if I see an http connection on ext_if, is there a way to find out on behalf of which LAN host squid is making that connection? Using FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE, pf and Lusca latest port. I tried to search for a hint but this is really tricky to Google for. Please forgive me the OT but this list has always been a good first step for the right directions. Thanks, -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: qbittorrent freezes, ioctl sign-extension ioctl ffffffff8004667e
On Sat, 7 Jul 2012 20:52:50 +0200 Jens Schweikhardt schwe...@schweikhardt.net wrote: hello, world\n is anybody else seeing this? On a fresh 9-STABLE/amd64 as of July 7, with all ports compiled from scratch. Qbittorrent (2.9.11) freezes after about 10 to 20 seconds, reacts to mouse clicks only after a minute or so; the window isn't redrawn when it was obscured by other windows and /var/log/messages has this to say: Jul 7 11:09:56 hal9000 kernel: WARNING pid 89448 (qbittorrent): ioctl sign-extension ioctl 8004667e Jul 7 11:10:50 hal9000 kernel: WARNING pid 89448 (qbittorrent): ioctl sign-extension ioctl 8004667e Jul 7 11:11:21 hal9000 last message repeated 38 times There's no way out other than sending two SIGINT (CTRL-C) to kill qbittorrent. It looks like this is similar or even the same problem as in http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2010-June/057360.html If it was ever fixed, then it looks like it reappeared. Regards, Jens Just upgrade to net-p2p/libtorrent-rasterbar-16 and libtorrent-rasterbar-16-python. This should fix it. -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: qbittorrent freezes, ioctl sign-extension ioctl ffffffff8004667e [SOLVED]
On Mon, 9 Jul 2012 00:00:20 +0200 (CEST)
Wojciech Puchar woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl wrote:
On Sun, 8 Jul 2012, RW wrote:
On Sat, 7 Jul 2012 20:52:50 +0200
Jens Schweikhardt wrote:
hello, world\n
is anybody else seeing this? On a fresh 9-STABLE/amd64 as of July
7, with all ports compiled from scratch. Qbittorrent (2.9.11)
freezes after about 10 to 20 seconds, reacts to mouse clicks only
after a minute or so; the window isn't redrawn when it was
obscured by other windows and ...
I tried it a few weeks ago on 8.3. I found that it locks-up just
after the first torrent is added, or if it's started with a torrent
already loaded.
mosy probably not FreeBSD related. just a buggy program
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Sorry for my last post. Spoke too soon. I found the problem!.
It lies inside devel/boost-libs.
After you issue make patch, apply this to
work/boost_1_48_0/boost/asio/detail/io_control.hpp.
I couldn't manage to produce a proper diff file.
*** 46,52
// Get the name of the IO control command.
ioctl_cmd_type name() const
{
- return static_castint(FIONBIO);
+ return static_castioctl_cmd_type(FIONBIO);
*** 96,102
// Get the name of the IO control command.
ioctl_cmd_type name() const
{
- return static_castint(FIONREAD);
+ return static_castioctl_cmd_type(FIONREAD);
}
-Rebuild/reinstall devel/boost-libs
-Rebuild/reinstall net-p2p/libtorrent-rasterbar-16
-Rebuild/reinstall net-p2p/libtorrent-rasterbar-16-python
-Rebuild/reinstall net-p2p/qbittorrent
No more lockups and kernel messages!! :) after I did this, qbittorrent
has been up flawlessly for almost 2 hours.
I don't know how to get in touch with the boost-lib port mantainer so
he/she can fix the port file patch-boost_asio-ioctl to add these
changes.
--
Mario Lobo
http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br
FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99% winblows FREE)
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: qbittorrent freezes, ioctl sign-extension ioctl ffffffff8004667e [SOLVED]
On Mon, 9 Jul 2012 15:35:01 -0700 Eitan Adler li...@eitanadler.com wrote: On 9 July 2012 15:26, Mario Lobo l...@bsd.com.br wrote: I don't know how to get in touch with the boost-lib port mantainer so he/she can fix the port file patch-boost_asio-ioctl to add these changes. The best way to contact a maintainer for something like this is to submit a PR: http://www.freebsd.org/send-pr.html Done it! Thanks -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Uptime [OT]
On Friday 15 June 2012 09:49:49 Robert Bonomi wrote: From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Thu Jun 14 22:56:16 2012 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 22:51:45 -0500 From: Mark Felder f...@feld.me Cc: Steve Bertrand steve.bertr...@gmail.com Subject: Re: Uptime [OT] FreeBSD REDACTED 6.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE #0: Wed Nov 15 16:29:10 CST 2006 root@REDACTED:/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/IPFW-POLING-ALTQ i386 Theres no way I'm giving out the organization name or hostname haha. We're slowly moving customers away from this device, but not forcing anyone. I wonder if the technician who compiled that kernel considered how long it would run Heh. check out -this- one: % uname -a ** *** ** *** Kernel #0: Thu Mar 20 16:40:01 CST 1997 :/usr/src/sys/compile/LOCAL i386 The build date _is_ accurate, the hardware it's running on is old enough to vote. wry grin It's publicly accessible on the Internet, It's not quite as ridiculous as it looks, the (limited) apps running on it _are_ up-to-date. Hi; This is from a colleague Alex Moura at our brazilian bsd list. FreeBSD helm 4.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 4.1-RELEASE #0: Wed Dec 13 16:19:46 BRST 2000 11:47AM up 3532 days, 3:43, 1 user, load averages: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 3532 days before now Friday, July 13, 2001 9 years, 8 months, 3 days, 16 hours ref. http://www.mail-archive.com/freebsd-chat@freebsd.org/msg02477.html -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: (no subject)
On Monday 04 June 2012 11:12:01 Polytropon wrote: On Mon, 4 Jun 2012 06:54:37 +0200 (CEST), Wojciech Puchar wrote: youtube is not a problem, use youtube-dl from ports and do download videos to disk drive, then watch instead of having movies in the internet, where they can disappear everytime youtube decide that you should's watch it. Additionally, it allows the user to use his favourite media player (e. g. mplayer) with all its support (still, rew, ff, brightness/contrast adjust, keyboard support) except to have dealing with it in a web browser window with its very limited means of user friendlyness. Flashblocker and downloadhelper plugins for FF. Work like a charm !! -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: (no subject)
On Friday 01 June 2012 03:29:40 Thomas Mueller wrote: I ddon't see any advantage in FreeBSD 8.x or earlier. Well, I still see complains about a few quirks in 9 here in the list, specially after certain src updates. Re:Use of C99 extra long double math functions after r236148 Re: kern/168190: [pf] panic when using pf and route-to (maybe: bad fragment handling?) Re: ULE/sched issues on stable/9 - why isn't preemption occurring? Etc .. To me, something like pf (specially route-to!) is critical and for the moment, I wouldn't touch my rock-solid-down-to-the-micro-second perfect production firewall 8-STABLE server for nothing, if the aim is such a role. I think that distribution set size is just not a very strong argument. OTOH, if the aim is just experimenting, that's another story. -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Dual Boot Windows 7 FreeBSd 8.3
On Wednesday 23 May 2012 18:49:06 Jerry McAllister wrote: Hi, I have been searching through questions and forums for information on dual booting FreeBSD 8.3 on a machine with Windows 7 already on it. My problem is that the posts seem to go around in circles and be contradictory. I am not sure which to believe. My new machine has two disk drives. Windows 7 is on ad0 and I want to put FreeBSD 8.3 on ad1, leaving W7 as is. So, I don't even have to shrink a primary slice to do this. Thank you, jerry ___ Since each system is going to be on different physical drives, why don't you make things easy for you and just use the BIOS boot menu to choose which drive to boot from? -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Dual Boot Windows 7 FreeBSd 8.3
On Wednesday 23 May 2012 19:41:22 Jerry McAllister wrote: Since each system is going to be on different physical drives, why don't you make things easy for you and just use the BIOS boot menu to choose which drive to boot from? That surely seems the hard way.Why interrupt the boot and go in to the BIOS every time when that is all provided for in the boot structure? jerry Because if you want to switch systems you're gonna have to reboot anyway! The boot manager is nothing but an automatic interruption of the boot process to give you a chance to press a key for the system you want to boot from. But you're right. Pressing 3 keys instead of one or none IS the hard way. just my 0,02... -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: kernel configuration file
On Sunday 06 May 2012 10:34:12 Carmel wrote: On Sun, 6 May 2012 08:08:31 -0500 (CDT) Robert Bonomi articulated: Carmel carmel...@hotmail.com wrote; In the Generic kernel configuration file for FreeBSD/amd64, if I do not have a floppy drive, is it safe to comment out this entry? # Floppy drives device fdc Definitely, yes. Are there any other entries that I could eliminate if I do not have a floppy drive? device atapifd obviouly. :) Thanks, I had not noticed that one. Also, according the the webcamd documentation, I need to have this in the loader.conf file. webcamd requires the cuse4bsd(3) kernel module. To load the driver as a module at boot time, place the following line in loader.conf(5): cuse4bsd_load=YES Is there a way that I can simply compile it into the kernel? Would a: device cuse4bsd# Required by webcamd entry in the kernel file work? I cannot find any documentation on that. The simplest approach for this is 'try it and find out'. If you use the traditional kernel-huild 'Configure/make depend/make' sequence, to rebuild the kernel -only-, its a matter of one minute or so on a _slow_ (486-class) machine. you'll either get a Configure error, a linker error, or it 'just works'. OK, now you lost me. I use the following basic sequence: make buildworld make buildkernel KERNCONF=CARMEL make installkernel KERNCONF=CARMEL make installworld I am sorry, but I am not fully comprehending what commands you want me to enter. Carmel; You don't need to build the whole world if you only need a kernel rebuild. just edit your kernel file and issue: cd /usr/src make kernel KERNCONF=CARMEL the 2nd line builds AND installs the new kernel. -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Music production on FreeBSD
On Saturday 07 April 2012 21:04:41 Tony wrote: Hello! Is anybody aware of any talented producers who produce their music primarily on FreeBSD? Thanks! Tony Man, that has been my dream for a good while! Ardour is a fine multitrack but no MIDI, at least on FreeBSD. And FBSD itself has lots of issues with MIDI. Besides that, there is the driver problem with most professional sound boards. I am going to attempt something a quite bit out of my league which is try to port the alsa drivers for my echo Gina3G board to FBSD. If I can manage to do that, then I believe the rest will fall on my lap by gravity. I hope I don't blow up my desktop. I'm eager to read the replies to the OP. -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Suggestion
On Friday 09 March 2012 01:56:25 Bruno Comerci wrote: Hi guys. Instead of wasting your time and man power, why wont you join to the ReactOS project? It would be more beneficial to the internet community and to the users around the world who wants a free OS with similar looking and functions than Windows, if you just throw away your FreeBSD and join forces with the ReactOS team to accelerate their process. Actually there isnt any single free OS that can be fully trusted, but ReactOS seems to be that one that we all are wating for. Sincerely, Common world's citizen who dont have money to pay Windows and dont trust Linux and any other Unix-based OS. Hey Man (man ???) ! Your mom should be running after you all over the house, with your hot milk bottle and pacifier in hand, because you skipped your nap time. Please, have mercy on her and go right up to bed. -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: FreeBSD Kernel Internals Documentation
On Wednesday 04 January 2012 17:47:52 Lyubomir Grigorov wrote: Mainly to Jerry and Chad, but anyone contributing to the flame and OT fest, How I feel whenever I see people argue on the internet http://i.imgur.com/biopQ.gif -- Lyubomir Grigorov (bgalakazam) Yes! humor. I think open-sore is really cute, intelligent and funny. More so than winblows or micro$hit. Even with nicknames we get better results!. I believe we could all profit from being able to laugh at that too. -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: FreeBSD Kernel Internals Documentation
On Monday 02 January 2012 18:42:44 Nikola Pavlović wrote: On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 03:32:17PM -0500, David Jackson wrote: [troll snipper] . perhaps could be a porting of the IOKit driver system from Darwin, perhaps even allowing Darwin drivers to be used on FreeBSD. All of this can go into a kernel module so that if all one uses is native FreeBSD drivers made for FreeBSDs normal driver API, they won't need to load this subsystem. You see, you could have just proposed this in the first place instead of provoking a flame fest, ranting about, mostly imagined, lack of documentation, GUI configuration tools and giving condescending lectures on programmer productivity. Oh well... Right on, Nikola ! But David's paragraph I left in is a real dream for me. It is basicaly what's keeping me from using FBSD as my audio workstation. I have an Echo Gina3D card there is simply no FBSD driver for it. But there are Mac drivers from Echo!. I even too a shot at downloading the framework/API from Echo (windows :( ) but it is just way above me. A colegue from Japan had written a driver for an old Echo Gina 20 bit which I managed to compile and load (believe it or not) but it was for FBSD 5. I tried to compile it on my FBSD 8 STABLE but it issues too much errors that (again) is beyond my capacity. But I'm a stubborn one, so I'll try to keep learning from my mistakes. Maybe one day a new driver for FBSD will be born. -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Waay OT Now... FreeBSD Kernel Internals Documentation
On Monday 02 January 2012 20:25:22 Da Rock wrote: On 01/03/12 08:10, Mario Lobo wrote: On Monday 02 January 2012 18:42:44 Nikola Pavlović wrote: On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 03:32:17PM -0500, David Jackson wrote: [troll snipper] . perhaps could be a porting of the IOKit driver system from Darwin, perhaps even allowing Darwin drivers to be used on FreeBSD. All of this can go into a kernel module so that if all one uses is native FreeBSD drivers made for FreeBSDs normal driver API, they won't need to load this subsystem. You see, you could have just proposed this in the first place instead of provoking a flame fest, ranting about, mostly imagined, lack of documentation, GUI configuration tools and giving condescending lectures on programmer productivity. Oh well... Right on, Nikola ! But David's paragraph I left in is a real dream for me. It is basicaly what's keeping me from using FBSD as my audio workstation. I have an Echo Gina3D card there is simply no FBSD driver for it. But there are Mac drivers from Echo!. I even too a shot at downloading the framework/API from Echo (windows :( ) but it is just way above me. A colegue from Japan had written a driver for an old Echo Gina 20 bit which I managed to compile and load (believe it or not) but it was for FBSD 5. I tried to compile it on my FBSD 8 STABLE but it issues too much errors that (again) is beyond my capacity. But I'm a stubborn one, so I'll try to keep learning from my mistakes. Maybe one day a new driver for FBSD will be born. Completely off thread now... but I've had success using FBSD as an audio workstation for a recording job. Humm ... Drivers off-topic in a Kernel Internal documentation discussion? It may be a little off-topic from the OP, but waay OT? Please, allow me to disagree. Used Audacity, Rosegarden, hydrogen and Jack with a Yamaha usb soundboard. Midi was an issue though, and I used a linux workstation with Jack using net backend. That was over a year ago, and now I believe there is a jack midi interface for FBSD. Works well, but your hardware sounds like it does differ greatly, sorry. Yeah! I've done that too (all on FBSD). But I need it to work with a bit higher end cards like the Gina3D for pro-work. -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [OT] but concerns all of us (FINAL - moving to freebsd-chat)
On Friday 18 November 2011 13:13:33 C. P. Ghost wrote: On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 11:24 PM, Mario Lobo l...@bsd.com.br wrote: My apologies to all for this, specially to those who already know about this and those who think too little of it. I am really worried about this: http://americancensorship.org/ Mario, I couldn't agree more and it's a very important topic. But PLEASE let's take this thread to freebsd-chat@. It *really* doesn't belong here. Thanks, -cpghost. I'll re-post there. I wasn't subscribed to chat. Again, my apologies.. Best wishes, -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [OT] but concerns all of us [put down your coffee before reading]
On Thursday 17 November 2011 06:08:05 Nomen Nescio wrote: If these rootless people get control of what goes through the root servers Thanks, I spewed coffee out of my nose when I read this. I hope the coffee wasn't too hot. I was just trying to convey meaning, not to be orthographically right. Just in case you're not a totally alienated individual, this means that I should not worry about the issue, right? By the way, I was at home, long past my working hours when I saw the article and posted the message. -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [OT] but concerns all of us
On Thursday 17 November 2011 09:05:32 Jerry wrote: Sorry, but I totally disagree with you assessment of this bill. First of all, because I have not fully read it and secondly because I think it may in fact have merit. There are all ready too many scumbags who are illegally ripping off the works of others using a multitude of false pretenses. A developer, writer or what ever title you choose to assign to said individual has a right to protect his/her/their property. If you want to use a copyrighted or patented item you either get legal permission and pay a fee if required. Any attempt to use said item(s) without properly obtained the legal right to first is nothing more than common thrift and should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. The Internet was envisioned as a means of exchanging information, not pilfering it; although sadly enough it has rapidly developed into just that medium supported by socialists/fascists who would rather pilfer the works of another rather than obtaining the right to use said works. My assessment is still being built so thanks for sharing your thoughts on this, Jerry The basis for my worries is the fact that historically, every time governments want to control everything, they begin with a step that seems honest and fair to everybody but soon enough, this is extented to whatever they think is right for them. By controlling the root servers, they could blacklist anything. Aren't there enough laws already to protect copyright? -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [OT] but concerns all of us
On Thursday 17 November 2011 11:02:39 Rod Person wrote: Then once a new law is on the books, the officials find ways to use the laws in way the were not intended as in the case of the Patriot Act were it's use is over 90 some percent of the time has nothing to to with terrorism. This is EXACTLY what I meant by worry in my original post. Thanks for putting it into words. -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [OT] but concerns all of us
On Thursday 17 November 2011 17:28:39 Dave U. Random wrote: They already p0wned the root servers. Look at the Microsoft case. The federales went into private server farms and set up their own boxes. You think anything goes through American backbones and the guys in black suits with no sense of humor don't know about it, and can't reroute it or DOS it or make funny things happen already? Wake up and smell the Constitution burning. Yes but it isn't legal YET! Aren't there enough laws already to protect copyright? There are too many laws now to protect anything. I believe that this whole discussion boils down to one comment I just saw on ZDNET: Yes, our government is trying to censor the web. So is the UK. Our corrupt officials have sold our government to the highest bidder, and it is now operated by the rich for the rich... and they fear an American Spring(**) like the ones now being celebrated throughout the middle east. After crushing the citizens under heel for so long, they see what open communications have brought in Arabian countries and fear the same here. Thus, the land of the free and it's free speech must become a thing of the past so that the rich can continue to get richer and the poor may be oppressed more easily. Perhaps I am becoming a cynical old man as I watch them disassemble my constitution, but these are sad times : sad times indeed. Regards, Jon (**) which is already happening !! I think that this is what they want to stop. People are becoming aware of things, not through official statements, PBS, the State of the Union Address or mainstream media, but through each other! Fast and uncensored ! And from any point of the planet. Facts that would never come to public awareness otherwise.And this knowledge is empowering people to take to the streets knowing exactly why. Copyright, laws, intellectual property and legal jargons are nothing but smoke and mirrors. -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
[OT] but concerns all of us
My apologies to all for this, specially to those who already know about this and those who think too little of it. I am really worried about this: http://americancensorship.org/ If these rootless people get control of what goes through the root servers, we will loose the last free medium of expression and info exchange that is not owned by a corporation or anybody. I don't know if I should be worried or not, but if my worries are founded and this comes to pass, as far as I can see, it will be the end of this great tool as we know it today. There is a petition going on here: http://www.avaaz.org/en/save_the_internet/ There are a lot of Americans on this list that have a lot more power than the rest of us to change this. A LOT of people from all over the world is signing this petition. I hope at least some don't judge me to be over dramatic here but this situation sounds very much so. I hope that most of you (if not all) replicates this and that I don't get scalded for this post. I can only hope -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Solution for school lab just a thought
On Monday 31 October 2011 10:56:44 Sergio de Almeida Lenzi wrote: You should look into the Freebsd port qjail. At our school lab all the pcs have ms/windows on the hard drive with the putty client installed. Students use putty to get logged into a jail on a single Freebsd system. Each student can practice installing ports, packages, or one of the desktop window environments in their private jail. The goal being to teach students to be system administrators. Humm Interesting... In my case the computers runs FreeBSD (diskless) and they need do access windows system. In a public school, where the $$$ is the main problem, I think this is the solution. Here the school has computers (a lot) that receives from donation, projects... from time to time the problem is the software... What to teach to children??? word, exel, powerpoint, msn??? is this teaching??? I think that children (and teenagers too), must face problems and resolve them. the world belongs tho those that work in group. those who can get answers, so an account in a desktop environment (in my case: gnome) with several program languages, internet access, text composing (libreoffice), postscript printing (cups), some IDE (anjuta, eclipse), multimedia (ffmpeg, avidemux2, openshot, dvdstyler) can make the difference. They can download small videos from their phones, and produce digital media, share it on DVDs... the home lesson is send via email (everyone has email).. One problem is hand-witten... no one wants to hand write now... Those who foresee the future, can learn how to code GUI interface, and so produce software for the community. They can learn how to install admin FreeBSD servers, share files in the network, use webdav to share files in internet... and so on... There is a need for people with this knowledge... The society will buy from the students as long as they produce good software.. What is the other alternative??? finish high school and than look for a job??? XXI century there is no jobs, there will be working people... Those who can succeed working for himself will rule.. That is what I teach to my boys... They worked hard (12 years)... and now they rule.. Do you really think that this world crisis will end in 10 years??? Just a thought... Sergio Picture an arrow whistling through the wind, undisturbed, and hitting the bullseye dead in its perfect center, That's what your thought is to me, Sergio. +10 ! Thank you. -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Problem with samba 35
Hi; System: FBSD 8.2 STABLE amd64 2011/10/05 11:26:25.632002, 0] smbd/close.c:296(close_remove_share_mode) smbd[40272]: close_remove_share_mode: Could not get share mode lock for file I keep getting these messages and the system at the store (win) that uses the shares keep getting all sorts of problems problems. Tried everything I could think of without success !!! This didn't happen with samba 3.0.36. Can someone help me, please ?? Thanks Src Ports updated on 04/10/2011 smb.conf [global] netbios name = LosanGW workgroup = LOSAN server string = LOSAN Inet Server log file = /var/log/samba-log.%m max log size = 50 max xmit = 65535 domain master = yes local master = yes preferred master = yes ; os level = 65 name resolve order = host wins bcast security = share ; deadtime = 15 socket options = TCP_NODELAY dns proxy = No hosts allow = 10.10.10., 127. interfaces = 10.10.10.1 share modes = yes lock directory = /usr/local/etc/samba/locks [deposito] comment = Losan path = /deposito read only = No guest ok = Yes public = yes -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
VPN problem
Hi; I've been having this problem establishing a VPN behind a FreeBSD 8-STABLE with pf. I have this scenario: home LAN FBSD+pf home INTERNET --- FBSD+pf work --- work LAN MPD VPN server nat rules on FBSD+pf home: nat on $ext_if from $int_if:network to any - ($ext_if) port 1024:65535 # nat on $ext_if from any to any - ($ext_if) port 1024:65535 obs- it makes no difference which nat rule I use. The problem persists. These are the first 5 pf rules on FBSD+pf home: # pass quick all pass quick on lo0 all # my whole home lan is free pass in quick on $int_if from $int_if:network to any #--- Allow networks to see themselves and dns pass quick from $int_if:network to $int_if:network #--- Allow vpns from anywhere to anywhere pass in quick log on $int_if proto gre from any to any keep state pass in quick log on $int_if proto tcp from any to any port pptp flags S/SA keep state On any attempt to connect to the FBSD+pf work VPN Server from home LAN, I get this (even if I uncomment pass quick all): #mpd5 Multi-link PPP daemon for FreeBSD process 98799 started, version 5.5 (root@Papi 16:55 3-Sep-2011) CONSOLE: listening on 127.0.0.1 5005 web: listening on 127.0.0.1 5006 [B1] Bundle: Interface ng0 created [L1] [L1] Link: OPEN event [L1] LCP: Open event [L1] LCP: state change Initial -- Starting [L1] LCP: LayerStart [L1] PPTP call successful [L1] Link: UP event [L1] LCP: Up event [L1] LCP: state change Starting -- Req-Sent [L1] LCP: SendConfigReq #1 [L1] ACFCOMP [L1] PROTOCOMP [L1] ACCMAP 0x000a [L1] MRU 1486 [L1] MAGICNUM 2d08ae01 [snip..] [L1] LCP: SendConfigReq #10 [L1] ACFCOMP [L1] PROTOCOMP [L1] ACCMAP 0x000a [L1] MRU 1486 [L1] MAGICNUM 2d08ae01 [L1] LCP: parameter negotiation failed [L1] LCP: state change Req-Sent -- Stopped [L1] LCP: LayerFinish [L1] PPTP call terminated [L1] Link: DOWN event [L1] LCP: Close event [L1] LCP: state change Stopped -- Closed [L1] LCP: Down event [L1] LCP: state change Closed -- Initial BUT, on the 9th or 10th attempt, without touching any setting anywhere, the VPN MAY BE established. out of nothing ! Machines (Windows, Unix, whatever) behind both FBSD+pfs ALSO have the same problem when trying to close VPN tunnels to outside sites. Sometimes, opening an ssh session from my workstation to FBSD+pf work may help in establishing the VPN. The FBSD+pf work VPN Server is working fine. My colleagues can connect to it from their homes (NATted cable modems or 3G modems) without problems. I am the only one behind a FBSD+pf router. I installed MPD5 on FBSD+pf home, and copied mpd.conf from my home workstation to it. Without touching a single setting on mpd.conf, the VPN is established from FBSD+pf home (as a client) to FBSD+pf work WITHOUT any hiccups on EVERY SINGLE attempt! even I bring it up/down 200 times! And yet, if the FBSD+pf combo is out of the way, (i.e. no NAT!, as is the case of FBSD+pf home as a client) or if I let my cable modem do the NAT/routing, the problem is GONE!. FreeBSD work FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE #0: Mon Aug 22 14:50:42 BRT 2011 amd64 FreeBSD Home FreeBSD FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE #0: Wed May 18 16:53:26 BRT 2011 i386 Any suggestions? Thanks, -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
VPN problem
Hi; I've been having this problem closing a VPN behind a FreeBSD 8-STABLE with pf. I have this scenario: home LAN FBSD+pf home INTERNET --- FBSD+pf work --- work LAN MPD VPN server nat on $ext_if from $int_if:network to any - ($ext_if) port 1024:65535 # nat on $ext_if from any to any - ($ext_if) port 1024:65535 obs- it makes no difference which nat rule I use. The problem persists. These are the first 5 pf rules on FBSD+pf home: # pass quick all pass quick on lo0 all # my whole home lan is free pass in quick on $int_if from $int_if:network to any #--- Allow networks to see themselves and dns pass quick from $int_if:network to $int_if:network #--- Allow vpns from anywhere to anywhere pass in quick log on $int_if proto gre from any to any keep state pass in quick log on $int_if proto tcp from any to any port pptp flags S/SA keep state On any attempt to conect to the FBSD+pf work VPN Server from home LAN, I get this (even if I uncomment pass quick all): #mpd5 Multi-link PPP daemon for FreeBSD process 98799 started, version 5.5 (root@Papi 16:55 3-Sep-2011) CONSOLE: listening on 127.0.0.1 5005 web: listening on 127.0.0.1 5006 [B1] Bundle: Interface ng0 created [L1] [L1] Link: OPEN event [L1] LCP: Open event [L1] LCP: state change Initial -- Starting [L1] LCP: LayerStart [L1] PPTP call successful [L1] Link: UP event [L1] LCP: Up event [L1] LCP: state change Starting -- Req-Sent [L1] LCP: SendConfigReq #1 [L1] ACFCOMP [L1] PROTOCOMP [L1] ACCMAP 0x000a [L1] MRU 1486 [L1] MAGICNUM 2d08ae01 [snip..] [L1] LCP: SendConfigReq #10 [L1] ACFCOMP [L1] PROTOCOMP [L1] ACCMAP 0x000a [L1] MRU 1486 [L1] MAGICNUM 2d08ae01 [L1] LCP: parameter negotiation failed [L1] LCP: state change Req-Sent -- Stopped [L1] LCP: LayerFinish [L1] PPTP call terminated [L1] Link: DOWN event [L1] LCP: Close event [L1] LCP: state change Stopped -- Closed [L1] LCP: Down event [L1] LCP: state change Closed -- Initial BUT, on the 9th or 10th attempt, without touching any setting anywhere, the VPN MAY BE established. out of nothing ! Machines (Windows, unix, whatever) behind both FBSD+pfs ALSO have the same problem when trying to close VPN tunnels to outside sites. The FBSD+pf work VPN Server is working fine. My coleagues can conect to it from their homes (NATted cable modems or 3G modems) without problems. I am the only one behind a FBSD+pf router. I installed MPD5 on FBSD+pf home, and copied mpd.conf from my home workstation to it. Without touching a single setting on mpd.conf, the VPN is established from FBSD+pf home (as a client) to FBSD+pf work WITHOUT any hickups on EVERY SINGLE attempt! even I bring it up/down 200 times! And yet, if the FBSD+pf combo is out of the way, (i.e. no NAT!, as is the case of FBSD+pf home as a client) or if I let my cable modem do the NAT/routing, the problem is GONE!. FreeBSD work FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE #0: Mon Aug 22 14:50:42 BRT 2011 amd64 FreeBSD Home FreeBSD FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE #0: Wed May 18 16:53:26 BRT 2011 i386 Any suggestions? -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: VPN problem
On Friday 09 September 2011 18:11:47 Torsten Kersandt wrote: HI Mario I don't know what the experts are suggesting but I use a table for the VPN addresses To allow nat but block them frm using the server as gateway (use as default gateway disabled in windows) I add the rules dynamically using mpd if-up and if-down scripts All I have in my rules is GRE pass anywhere and nat table to and from where ever Regards Torsten Thanks for replying, Torsten but the problem is way before all these things that you mentioned. I'm wildly guessing here but the problem seems to be inside the NAT mechanism of PF. At least the working/not working situations point to that direction. If I don't find a solution to that soon I am gonna have no choice but to switch to IPFW, which I would not like to do because the queuing mechanisms of pf are extremely useful and handy to my networks. By the way, I also do each item that you mentioned in your post. The funny thing is that there was a time (maybe a couple csups ago) that this problem didn't occur, and I am totally unable to say which csup brought this issue in. Remeber there are 3 FBSDs involved here. -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) -Original Message- From: owner-freebsd...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Mario Lobo Sent: 09 September 2011 20:46 To: freebsd...@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: VPN problem Hi; I've been having this problem establishing a VPN behind a FreeBSD 8-STABLE with pf. I have this scenario: home LAN FBSD+pf home INTERNET --- FBSD+pf work --- work LAN MPD VPN server nat rules on FBSD+pf home: nat on $ext_if from $int_if:network to any - ($ext_if) port 1024:65535 # nat on $ext_if from any to any - ($ext_if) port 1024:65535 obs- it makes no difference which nat rule I use. The problem persists. These are the first 5 pf rules on FBSD+pf home: # pass quick all pass quick on lo0 all # my whole home lan is free pass in quick on $int_if from $int_if:network to any #--- Allow networks to see themselves and dns pass quick from $int_if:network to $int_if:network #--- Allow vpns from anywhere to anywhere pass in quick log on $int_if proto gre from any to any keep state pass in quick log on $int_if proto tcp from any to any port pptp flags S/SA keep state On any attempt to connect to the FBSD+pf work VPN Server from home LAN, I get this (even if I uncomment pass quick all): #mpd5 Multi-link PPP daemon for FreeBSD process 98799 started, version 5.5 (root@Papi 16:55 3-Sep-2011) CONSOLE: listening on 127.0.0.1 5005 web: listening on 127.0.0.1 5006 [B1] Bundle: Interface ng0 created [L1] [L1] Link: OPEN event [L1] LCP: Open event [L1] LCP: state change Initial -- Starting [L1] LCP: LayerStart [L1] PPTP call successful [L1] Link: UP event [L1] LCP: Up event [L1] LCP: state change Starting -- Req-Sent [L1] LCP: SendConfigReq #1 [L1] ACFCOMP [L1] PROTOCOMP [L1] ACCMAP 0x000a [L1] MRU 1486 [L1] MAGICNUM 2d08ae01 [snip..] [L1] LCP: SendConfigReq #10 [L1] ACFCOMP [L1] PROTOCOMP [L1] ACCMAP 0x000a [L1] MRU 1486 [L1] MAGICNUM 2d08ae01 [L1] LCP: parameter negotiation failed [L1] LCP: state change Req-Sent -- Stopped [L1] LCP: LayerFinish [L1] PPTP call terminated [L1] Link: DOWN event [L1] LCP: Close event [L1] LCP: state change Stopped -- Closed [L1] LCP: Down event [L1] LCP: state change Closed -- Initial BUT, on the 9th or 10th attempt, without touching any setting anywhere, the VPN MAY BE established. out of nothing ! Machines (Windows, Unix, whatever) behind both FBSD+pfs ALSO have the same problem when trying to close VPN tunnels to outside sites. Sometimes, opening an ssh session from my workstation to FBSD+pf work may help in establishing the VPN. The FBSD+pf work VPN Server is working fine. My colleagues can connect to it from their homes (NATted cable modems or 3G modems) without problems. I am the only one behind a FBSD+pf router. I installed MPD5 on FBSD+pf home, and copied mpd.conf from my home workstation to it. Without touching a single setting on mpd.conf, the VPN is established from FBSD+pf home (as a client) to FBSD+pf work WITHOUT any hiccups on EVERY SINGLE attempt! even I bring it up/down 200 times! And yet, if the FBSD+pf combo is out of the way, (i.e. no NAT!, as is the case of FBSD+pf home as a client) or if I let my cable modem do the NAT/routing, the problem is GONE!. FreeBSD work FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE #0: Mon Aug 22 14:50:42 BRT 2011 amd64 FreeBSD Home FreeBSD FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE #0: Wed May 18 16:53:26 BRT 2011 i386 Any suggestions? Thanks, ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Re: VPN problem
On Friday 09 September 2011 19:03:27 Torsten Kersandt wrote:
Hi
TUN and NG connections are not present at the time you start your server
and rules for such interfaces are not applicable to PF
You're right, but on the client end that is trying to conect to that server
behind a pf firewall, nat rules DO apply, and on my tests I can see for sure
that when I take NAT out of the picture, the VPN tunnel is established.
The is there the if up and if down functions of MPD come into place unless
you use IP Address/network specific rules.
One server I have in the if-up script:
/etc/rc.d/pf resync
/sbin/pfctl -t if_pptp -T add ${4}
I do all that! in fact even go beyond and use the linkup/down scripts to
create a log on the server of which user(s) is(are) conected to the VPN, from
which public IP, with which ng interface, at what time/date they logged in and
and logged out.
And it works perfectly fine including on the secondary MPD instance (bound
to IP address) allowing usage as default gateway functions.
Like I said before:
The FBSD+pf work VPN Server is working fine. My colleagues can connect to
it from their homes (NATted cable modems or 3G modems) without problems.
Other than that I think you will have to go down the bridging line.
I may be corrected bu others :-)
Regards
Torsten
Thanks again, Torsten. I think this issue seems to lie deeper that just pf
rules and link scripts
--
Mario Lobo
http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br
FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99% winblows FREE)
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd...@freebsd.org] On
Behalf Of Mario Lobo
Sent: 09 September 2011 22:53
To: freebsd...@freebsd.org
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: VPN problem
On Friday 09 September 2011 18:11:47 Torsten Kersandt wrote:
HI Mario
I don't know what the experts are suggesting but I use a table for the
VPN addresses
To allow nat but block them frm using the server as gateway (use as
default gateway disabled in windows)
I add the rules dynamically using mpd if-up and if-down scripts
All I have in my rules is GRE pass anywhere and nat table to and from
where ever
Regards
Torsten
Thanks for replying, Torsten but the problem is way before all these things
that you mentioned. I'm wildly guessing here but the problem seems to be
inside the NAT mechanism of PF. At least the working/not working situations
point to that direction.
If I don't find a solution to that soon I am gonna have no choice but to
switch to IPFW, which I would not like to do because the queuing mechanisms
of
pf are extremely useful and handy to my networks.
By the way, I also do each item that you mentioned in your post.
The funny thing is that there was a time (maybe a couple csups ago) that
this
problem didn't occur, and I am totally unable to say which csup brought
this
issue in. Remeber there are 3 FBSDs involved here.
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd...@freebsd.org]
On
Behalf Of Mario Lobo
Sent: 09 September 2011 20:46
To: freebsd...@freebsd.org
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: VPN problem
Hi;
I've been having this problem establishing a VPN behind a FreeBSD
8-STABLE with pf.
I have this scenario:
home LAN FBSD+pf home INTERNET --- FBSD+pf work --- work LAN
MPD VPN server
nat rules on FBSD+pf home:
nat on $ext_if from $int_if:network to any - ($ext_if) port 1024:65535
# nat on $ext_if from any to any - ($ext_if) port 1024:65535
obs- it makes no difference which nat rule I use. The problem persists.
These are the first 5 pf rules on FBSD+pf home:
# pass quick all
pass quick on lo0 all
# my whole home lan is free
pass in quick on $int_if from $int_if:network to any
#--- Allow networks to see themselves and dns
pass quick from $int_if:network to $int_if:network
#--- Allow vpns from anywhere to anywhere
pass in quick log on $int_if proto gre from any to any keep state
pass in quick log on $int_if proto tcp from any to any port pptp flags
S/SA
keep state
On any attempt to connect to the FBSD+pf work VPN Server from home LAN,
I get this (even if I uncomment pass quick all):
#mpd5
Multi-link PPP daemon for FreeBSD
process 98799 started, version 5.5 (root@Papi 16:55 3-Sep-2011)
CONSOLE: listening on 127.0.0.1 5005
web: listening on 127.0.0.1 5006
[B1] Bundle: Interface ng0 created
[L1] [L1] Link: OPEN event
[L1] LCP: Open event
[L1] LCP: state change Initial -- Starting
[L1] LCP: LayerStart
[L1] PPTP call successful
[L1] Link: UP event
[L1] LCP: Up event
[L1] LCP: state change Starting -- Req-Sent
[L1] LCP: SendConfigReq #1
[L1] ACFCOMP
[L1] PROTOCOMP
[L1] ACCMAP 0x000a
[L1
Re: A quality operating system
On Thursday 25 August 2011 01:39:54 Polytropon wrote: Last, suppose you issue a general invitation for people to go over to your house for a free dinner, with food that you know (because you helped in preparing it!) in your heart and taste to be excellent, well prepared and nutritious. And all of a sudden I storm at your door and yell for all the guests that already know what you know about the food, without even tasting anything, that a very good and knowledgeable friend of mine told me that the kitchen is as dirty as hell, the food tastes terrible and that all the guests will get diarrhea and probably die if they eat anything. What would you do? Wow, what a nice analogy! =^_^= Thanks Man. :) I can almost feel sorry for poor Evan. I think he doesn't know what he's missing here. -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: A quality operating system
On Saturday 27 August 2011 16:58:06 Frank Shute wrote: On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 01:56:16PM -0500, Evan Busch wrote: [Snip..] If so, it's just them trying to cover up the inherently defensive and reactionary nature of their comments. They're inherently defensive and reactionary because you're trolling. Would they send such an email on a business list? Who cares? It's not a business list. You can predict that everywhere. Just go to any halfway specialized setting and make claims about something not meeting your requirements I've never had this problem when the claims have been stated professionally -- only here. OK, so you'll be able to provide links then? Thought not. Well, I don't know about everybody else but I don't believe that the aim of this gentleman's OP was about being constructive, at all. Like somebody had already said here, he was just a kid that threw a rock on a wasp's nest, didn't have legs to run fast enough, and now he is crying all over the place because he got stung. So, to exhaust everything I have to say on this subject, I will try to translate the best I can, two popular sayings here in my country. I hope I can make their meaning get through. To his criticism on documentation: To a good 'understander', a half-word is enough. To his deliriously vague critique on FreeBSD in general: The dogs always bark. But the caravan steadily moves on. -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: to come from Linux to FreeBSD
On Wednesday 24 August 2011 08:48:30 Julian H. Stacey wrote: Hi, Reference: From: Dick Hoogendijk d...@nagual.nl Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 12:24:37 +0200 Message-id: 4e54d165.7090...@nagual.nl Dick Hoogendijk wrote: Op 24-8-2011 10:41, Matthew Seaman schreef: Virtualization is actually a bit of a tricky thing with FreeBSD. There's Jail, which is excellent -- very light weight, but it only works with FreeBSD guests. There's VirtualBox, but that runs the guest OSes as a standard client application and it tends to be slow VirtualBox is absolutely not slow. At least not on Solaris nor on windows7 boxes. The VB support from FreeBSD is not that good imho. It is a lot easier to get it going under linux, windows or solaris. I know, fbsd packages do not exist. I wonder why... I don't know how you guys have been installing Virtualbox on FreeBSD but I have been using it since 3.x.x, Always compiling it from ports (using 4.1.2 now), almost without glitch. The almost is on account of a long gone bug with nvidia driver versions 1.7.something. Nothing to do with VB. After that, no glitches anymore. As how it runs on my 8-STABLE amd64, I've been able to compare it to vmware and hiper-v and as far as running the same things on the 3 of them, to me, VBox outperformed both in terms of speed and responsiveness. All 3 are pretty stable and hiper-v needs a monster machine to run, contrary to VB and VW. I have linux (fedora, centos and ubuntu), OS-x (hackintosh and SL), Os/2, Android, Xp (32/64),Win 2003 and win7 (32/64) vms, all jumping from VB version to VB version, all without a single glitch, and all performing better with each new version. I went as far as installing a background VB Xp vm on my firewall (which is a small FBSD 8-STABLE i386 ) for application testing purposes. I can't say how VB runs on huge environments because I don't have access to any. As for support for VB in general, just stay tunned to vbox-users-commun...@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/vbox-users-community and vbox-...@virtualbox.org http://vbox.innotek.de/mailman/listinfo/vbox-dev and http://forums.virtualbox.org/ I'm sure anyone will find all questions answered. and specific to FreeBSD. Bernhard Froehlich has been doing a wonderful job, constantly updating the VB ports. Check out https://svn.bluelife.at/index.cgi/blueports under emulators. -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: A quality operating system
Hi Evan; Please allow me some comments. On Wednesday 24 August 2011 23:02:18 Evan Busch wrote: I didn't expect this much response. That's a bit naive and shows how much you don't know this list. Some interesting stuff: Here, this is mostly the case. Even the trolls are so. On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 1:49 AM, Test Rat ttse...@gmail.com wrote: There is an ongoing discussion on arch@ about this. http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch/2011-August/011412.html This is an excellent discussion. Thank you. You bet! Full of technical details and concrete arguments. On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Dave Pooser dave-free...@pooserville.com wrote: My own take: 1) I really don't see the Handbook as all that great. It's Every professional documentarian I've encountered agrees with you. It's inconsistent, wordy, and has no concept of the order of introduction of its concepts. No professional software package would ship with documentation this bad. The multiple grammatical errors only enhance the sense of its fundamentally confused nature as a document. Well, I think the handbook has got its name wrong. To me, it should have been called handybook. What you're saying sounds more like you wanted the handbook to be a usage tutorial, which it's NOT what it is supposed to be. If you put micro$oft's docs into this picture, prepare you wallet for tons of books. And in microsoft's case, it has an obligation to take you by the hand, and IT DOESN'T !. I've been using FBSD since 2.2.8. When I first heard of it, I first did my homework: Googled for its history, its architecture, its inner workings, compatibility, etc.. (all of these are IN the handbook, by the way!) and opinions/usage by others. When I went to the handbook for the first time (not straight to it but by chance while googling for some solution), I was already a user for a good while. I already knew what FreeBSD was about, so whatever I found on the handbook was already familiar to me!. The only time I resort straight to the handbook is to the hardware compatibility list whenever I'm thinking of buying something new for the server/desktop, but BEFORE I actually buy it. For everything else, man pages and the lists are my lord and my shepard. I think Polytropon put it very well: In most cases, documentation requires you to have a minimal clue of what you're doing. There's terminology you simply have to know, and concepts to understand in order to use the documentation. As far as people proving my point about the BSD community being reactionary: (1) [snip..] Let's ponder over this in a rational and cold way. First: You never mentioned in your post for how long you have been using FreeBSD or if you have even used it at all, which its obvious simply by lack of specific details, so your critique looses the by experience tag from the start. That's a no-no for this list, which will not measure distances to help people that already tried to help themselves. Second, throughout your post, it sounds like your thoughts sprung up, not from your own quest and research, but from somebody (Ron) who is completely pro- Linux and pro-Windows, and against FreeBSD (hummm...) and that is the biggest UNIX fanatic I know(100x hummm...). And Ron's millage with FreeBSD is never mentioned also, so that kinda drops the critique's credibility tag to the floor. Last, suppose you issue a general invitation for people to go over to your house for a free dinner, with food that you know (because you helped in preparing it!) in your heart and taste to be excellent, well prepared and nutritious. And all of a sudden I storm at your door and yell for all the guests that already know what you know about the food, without even tasting anything, that a very good and knowledgeable friend of mine told me that the kitchen is as dirty as hell, the food tastes terrible and that all the guests will get diarrhea and probably die if they eat anything. What would you do? -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: A quality operating system
On Saturday 20 August 2011 19:47:07 Fish Kungfu wrote: Meanwhile, the OP has run away giggling like a juvenile who just threw a rock at a hornets nest. You bet! The OP (and Rob) were probably just bored, but Vadim Goncharov was definetly NOT! (Thanks Test Rat!) http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch/2011-August/011412.html. That got me worried. It does provide a global picture as to why some of OP's bad feelings about the future of FreeBSD can pop up. -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: High interrupt rate
On Monday 08 August 2011 21:30:41 b. f. wrote: I'll wait for your views on those before disabling polling on the kernel and hz=100. It looks like your interrupt rate, while probably higher than needed, is not unexpectedly high for your configuration. But you can lower it if you want to do so. You are using a system before the introduction of the new eventtimer code. If you use 9.x, that has the new code and some other timer-related improvements, and you are not performing polling, then you can achieve a large reduction in the number of timer interrupts when the system isn't busy. You can still achieve a reduction on 8.x, but the reduction usually won't be as large as on 9.x under similar conditions. To reduce timer interrupts on an idle system running 8.x or 9.x, if you do not need to poll (most systems do not), remove DEVICE_POLLING from your kernel, and lower kern.hz to a suitable value -- 100 or 250, for example. For many workloads, a lower value is not only adequate, but may also be better in some ways. Also, you may want to consider using your TSC as the system timecounter, because it is usually more efficient to do so. This may not work for SMP, because if there are multiple TSCs on your system, they may not be synchronized. In 9.x, there is a test for synchronization, and the TSCs are preferred to the ACPI-safe timer if they satisfy this test and meet some other requirements. In 8.x, the user has to tell the system that it is safe to use the TSCs by adding: kern.timecounter.smp_tsc=1 to /boot/loader.conf. If you are not putting your cores into the C3 state, then you could try setting this via the loader command line, booting, and then seeing if the kern.timecounter.tc.TSC.quality is positive, kern.timecounter.hardware is TSC, and everything is working as expected. If the results are satisfactory, then you could add the above entry to /boot/loader.conf. But it would be better to do this on 9.x, where there are some added safeguards. b. b.; Something really odd happened. After I sent you the data, while waiting for your reply, I changed Lusca cache to use 64M ram instead of the 256M it had. It was 1/8th of ram so I just decided to give it less. Well, I swear to you this was the ONLY thing I did!. Since then, the system has been running at around 97% idle 98% of the time! During load hours, there are only short(1s) spikes of 75%ish idle, far from each other. And web performance is actually a little better! And the overall response of the system improved. That's why I waited a couple of days to reply so I could confirm this behavior. I don't know. Maybe with more ram, lusca was spawning to many threads and thus loading the CPU but this is just a guess. I will take lusca memory back to 256 for the sake of checking but I want to find out if this new found estability is there to stay so I'll wait a little longer to do that. Your suggestions will be kept handy just in case. Thanks for everything. -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: High interrupt rate
On Sunday 07 August 2011 18:34:27 b. f. wrote: I know 75% idle is not bad but this machine, when not under load on a saturday night like today, used to be at around 98% idle 99% of the time. Now its is at 72% idle 99.9% of the time. It has been like this all day. The only things with a high interrupt rate are cpu0: timer 46922025 2000 cpu1: timer 46918117 1999 What could be causing this? I don't know that 2 timer interrupts per-cpu, per kern.hz, is altogether unexpected for some configurations, under some conditions. What happens if you boot with kern.hz=100 in /boot/loader.conf, or set via the loader command line? What happens if you remove the DEVICE_POLLING option from your kernel (and _not_ just disable polling per-device)? What is the output from sysctl kern.timecounter kern.eventtimer? b. Thanks b. ! [~]sysctl kern.timecounter kern.timecounter.tick: 1 kern.timecounter.choice: TSC(-100) ACPI-safe(850) i8254(0) dummy(-100) kern.timecounter.hardware: ACPI-safe kern.timecounter.stepwarnings: 0 kern.timecounter.tc.i8254.mask: 65535 kern.timecounter.tc.i8254.counter: 39201 kern.timecounter.tc.i8254.frequency: 1193182 kern.timecounter.tc.i8254.quality: 0 kern.timecounter.tc.ACPI-safe.mask: 16777215 kern.timecounter.tc.ACPI-safe.counter: 1055460 kern.timecounter.tc.ACPI-safe.frequency: 3579545 kern.timecounter.tc.ACPI-safe.quality: 850 kern.timecounter.tc.TSC.mask: 4294967295 kern.timecounter.tc.TSC.counter: 1200011080 kern.timecounter.tc.TSC.frequency: 1995401152 kern.timecounter.tc.TSC.quality: -100 kern.timecounter.smp_tsc: 0 kern.timecounter.invariant_tsc: 1 [~]sysctl kern.hz kern.hz: 1000 [~]sysctl kern.eventtimer sysctl: unknown oid 'kern.eventtimer' I'll wait for your views on those before disabling polling on the kernel and hz=100. Thanks again. -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
High interrupt rate
Hi there; My system is a FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE #0: Wed Jul 13 17:32:44 BRT 2011 i386 I have 4 nics. sis0, rl0, vr0 and dc0. The last three are in polling mode (which I did to see if it would decrease the int amount). The int rate for sis0 is low. vmstat -i reports: interrupt total rate irq6: fdc0 1 0 irq14: ata0 163039 6 irq15: ata1 29 0 irq19: sis0 vr0 688525 29 irq20: ohci0 27 0 irq23: ehci0 2 0 cpu0: timer 46922025 2000 cpu1: timer 46918117 1999 Total 94691765 4036 But top reports: last pid: 5163; load averages: 0.04, 0.09, 0.08 up 0+06:30:13 20:13:59 144 processes: 3 running, 121 sleeping, 20 waiting CPU: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 1.2% system, 24.0% interrupt, 74.8% idle Mem: 42M Active, 154M Inact, 116M Wired, 96K Cache, 112M Buf, 1667M Free Swap: 4000M Total, 4000M Free PID USERNAMETHR PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND 11 root 2 171 ki31 0K16K CPU00 706:33 103.37% idle 12 root 20 -32- 0K 160K WAIT1 67:16 97.46% intr 0 root 10 -680 0K72K - 1 1:34 2.98% kernel Systat reports: 1 usersLoad 0.12 0.11 0.08 Aug 6 20:15 Mem:KBREALVIRTUAL VN PAGER SWAP PAGER Tot Share TotShareFree in out in out Act 560965076 194524 9784 1706152 count All 1139006624 234149213732 pages Proc:Interrupts r p d s w Csw Trp Sys Int Sof Fltcow4042 total 73 6150 10 405 44 30k zfodfdc0 irq6 ozfod ata0 irq14 1.5%Sys 25.0%Intr 0.0%User 0.0%Nice 73.5%Idle%ozfod ata1 irq15 ||||||||||| daefr44 sis0 vr0 1 = prcfr ohci0 20 5 dtbuf totfr ehci0 23 Namei Name-cache Dir-cache60 desvn react 1999 cpu0: time Callshits %hits % 27121 numvn pdwak 1999 cpu1: time 943 frevn pdpgs intrn Disks ad0 ad1 cd0 pass0 118476 wire KB/t 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 43796 act tps 0 0 0 0 157764 inact MB/s 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 96 cache %busy 0 0 0 0 1706056 free 114880 buf I know 75% idle is not bad but this machine, when not under load on a saturday night like today, used to be at around 98% idle 99% of the time. Now its is at 72% idle 99.9% of the time. It has been like this all day. The only things with a high interrupt rate are cpu0: timer 46922025 2000 cpu1: timer 46918117 1999 What could be causing this? thanks, -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: more information
On Friday 05 August 2011 19:47:17 Chad Perrin wrote: On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 12:37:30PM -0500, Gary Gatten wrote: If I find someone with an IQ of 160+ and they ask everyone to play nice, will you? Mine is only 140 something so I don't feel qualified to take this task on myself. It would be nice though if someone took such offense to a post they would simply ignore it or contact OP offline. Seem 50% of the content here is b!itching. Now sometimes, and perhaps most times, it serves as a source of entertainment for me. Others it's just annoying - such as now. With all this brain power and apparently spare time, can anyone tell me how to get back all the money I've lost in the market over the last 3 years? Or, perhaps in the last 3 days? I would like some help with that! Regarding IQ tests . . . there's not much point in comparing measurements. I've taken half a dozen or so IQ tests over the years. Among them, all but two have landed between 135 and 168, depending on the specific test, the scale used, what I had for breakfast that morning, my mood, the sort of uses to which I've put my brain in the year or two immediately preceding the test, my age, and numerous other factors. Those other two tests -- one of them came in under 100, and the other was off the charts to the tune of +30 or more, probably a lot more according to the guy scoring it. Add to that an SAT score from way back when the SATs actually measured aptitude and were considered suitable measures of IQ to qualify people for Mensa membership, with every single score I've gotten differing notably from all the rest, and the result seems obvious: Whatever each of you has for an IQ score from some test years ago, chances are good that if you took a test again you would get a wildly different result. . . . and let's not forget that deficiencies in some areas can drag your score down, while particular aptitudes can in others can drag it up, skewing the overall results in a way that might set unrealistic expectations one way or the other for judging general intelligence. Good at spacial relations, but bad at abstract logic? Maybe you'll end up confusing the hell out of people who think you're brilliant half the time and rock stupid the other half. As for your money lost to the market, you're going to have a tough time getting someone to tell you a foolproof way to get it back that does not involve time travel. If I had a pretty clear view of your investment patterns over the years that led to these losses, though, I could probably give you some halfway decent advice to avoid taking similar losses in the future. Unfortunately, it's much more difficult to predict future (safe) money-makers than to point out where someone is just gambling with market trends that represent aberrations rather than the consistent positive growth that they think it really represents, with a basic grasp of some driving economic principles. In general, my first piece of advice would be that you should never invest in something whose success you do not actually understand at the level of microeconomic principles. Next, consider the political landscape that might skew the effect of those principles. . . . and if you can do that, you should also be able to develop a pretty good intuition for dealing with security threats for your FreeBSD systems, because a lot of those threats are essentially the result of economic and political circumstances inspiring people to act according to their natures. Voila. By a long and circuitous route, I brought it back to the subject of FreeBSD. Do I get a cookie? Yeah, Chad! and crispy one indeed. This IQ thing is really boring. Luckily, I never had to take an IQ test but I know that some people who took them didn't have an option. It was either it or the job. But actually, I'm not even curious about it. It is much more appealing to me to spend time studying and learning new things about FreeBSD for instance, than to spend time, as short as it may be, trying to find out how big my brain d**k is. A lazy bum with an IQ of 2000 is worthless while an energetic jack ass with an IQ of -100 at least can be used to pull a chariot or something. IQ tests can't point out character and diligence. Psychological profiles may do that but that's for another troll. -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Phenom II 975 BE shows 0 celsius
On Monday 01 August 2011 15:52:30 Matthew D. Fuller wrote: On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 09:28:29PM -0300 I heard the voice of Mario Lobo, and lo! it spake thus: Unfortunately this Mobo died and only found AM3 boards for which my phenom 955 doesn't fit. Not that it helps you now, but the 955 _is_ perfectly compatible with AM3. It's only the initial 920 and 940 that were AM2-only. I was just following this: http://support.amd.com/us/kbarticles/Pages/CPU-6-socket-am2-plus-phenom-ii- compatibility-alert.aspx -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Phenom II 975 BE shows 0 celsius
Hi to all In my desktop machine, I had an AM2+ ASROCK mobo with Phenom II 955 BE that showed each core temperature perfectly under FBSD 8-STABLE, via dev.cpu.x.temp. amdtemp.ko loaded. Unfortunately this Mobo died and only found AM3 boards for which my phenom 955 doesn't fit. So I got an ASUS M4A88T-V EVO with a Phenom II 975 BE. Funny thing. An AM3 phenom II fits on an AM2 board but an AM3 board doesn't accept an AM2/AM2+ phenom II :(. Anyway, now, under the very same system, it shows 0 degrees on dev.cpu.x.temp for all cores. I've been looking through k8temp and amdtemp src code. I am definitely not sure of this but I believe something might have happened to those: From k8temp.h K10_THERM_REG 0xa4 K10_THERMTRIP_REG 0xe4 K10_CURTMP(val)(((val) 21) 0xfff) K10_THERMTRIP(val) ((val 1) 1) From amdtemp.c /* * Register control (K8 family) */ #define AMDTEMP_REG0F 0xe4 #define AMDTEMP_REG_SELSENSOR 0x40 #define AMDTEMP_REG_SELCORE 0x04 /* * Register control (K10 K11) family */ #define AMDTEMP_REG 0xa4 Output of k8temp -dn: CPUID: Vendor: AuthenticAMD, 0x100f43: Model=04 Family=f+1 Stepping=3 Advanced Power Management=0x1f9 Temperature sensor: Yes Frequency ID control: No Voltage ID control: No THERMTRIP support: Yes HW Thermal control: Yes SW Thermal control: Yes 100MHz multipliers: Yes HW P-State control: Yes TSC Invariant: Yes Temp=c0fef ThermTrip=1fc00c30 0 I keep a small win7 partition to test little things like this and see if the same thing happens there, and it doesn't, so I concluded that the sensors are there and are working. One thing is worth noting though. I have used a free gadget that shows activity/temp for each core. It worked fine with the previous MB/CPU.That ALSO stopped working with this new MB. Like FBSD, it shows 0 degrees for any core too, although it correctly displays each core load. The only windows tool that correctly shows the temperature are the ASUS tools that came with the mobo. Other than that, everything is working fine! The only thing I had to fix was the fstab ada location. I know this is not a big thing but I got accustomed to keeping an eye on those temperatures. I have googled for a few days now searching for Thermal register address or offsets for the Phenom II 975 BE, or anything related to this problem and found nothing. Every search on AMD site was fruitless. I could not find a single bit of tech info on this processor there, or any other tech info for that matter. Would any one have any pointers/clues/suggestions on this? Thanks, -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: 2020: Will BSD and Linux be relevant anymore?
On Tuesday 19 July 2011 03:18:41 Konrad Heuer wrote: But: Neither BSD nor Linux will ever have chance to conquere the desktop, despite of KDE, Gnome or anything else. In business environments there is no alternative to Windows. Microsoft successfully created Active Directory from DNS, LDAP and Kerberos with an easy-to-manage interface Konrad Heuer Err ... just a little correction here. Microsoft copied its AD deck from Novell Directory Services - NDS, shuffled the cards, added a few bits and pieces here and there and called it its own, having some similarities with NDS, as MS has ALWAYS been doing since DOS 1.0. I remember very well when the ease of management with NDS was well estabilished by NETWARE 6.xx (it showed up first in 5.xx) and delighting network admins who managed Novell environments (as I was doing at the time), when MS announced its, ahaam, revolutionary active directory services. NDS - ADS. Like I said, just card shuffling. -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Lennart Poettering: BSD Isn't Relevant Anymore
On Tuesday 19 July 2011 10:06:22 Jerry wrote: On Mon, 18 Jul 2011 20:33:01 -0300 Mario Lobo articulated: First of all, forgive me for top posting but I don't want to disturb the debate between Jerry and Polytropon. In fact, I enjoyed it so much that I saved it in separate folder. It is just plain good reading, not only because of the issue at hand, but also because of the elegance and intelligence of the arguments presented by each of them, and because it was delightful to notice how their cultural backgrounds influence their presentations, to the point where even when using harsh words didn't carry offense. Ah, how sweet. You have just made my Christmas Card list. I apologize if you are a non-Christian. Let me clarify that statement. I am not apologizing because you might not be a Christian, but rather for offering to place you on my Christmas Card list if you aren't. Well, no apologies needed!. I am truly honored to be in your Christmas card list, even if I was not a Christian, though that doesn't necessarily means that I am a Christian, at least in the pagan sense of the word (i.e. - what non-believers/atheists/whatever think a Christian is), or even in the non-pagan sense. Anyway, consider your offer mutual. I thought I had better make that clear less someone with an IQ of a cockroach claims I was attacking non-Christians. Gook thinking! So, apologies accepted, just in case a non-Christian moron shows up. -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: BSD: Relevant , Lennart Poettering Isn't Anymore
On Monday 18 July 2011 19:04:55 Outback Dingo wrote: Sorry Guys.. I just had to nail down the Subject Topic and correct it YEAH Thanks! -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Lennart Poettering: BSD Isn't Relevant Anymore
Hi; First of all, forgive me for top posting but I don't want to disturb the debate between Jerry and Polytropon. In fact, I enjoyed it so much that I saved it in separate folder. It is just plain good reading, not only because of the issue at hand, but also because of the elegance and intelligence of the arguments presented by each of them, and because it was delightful to notice how their cultural backgrounds influence their presentations, to the point where even when using harsh words didn't carry offense. I firmly believe that this is why FreeBSD exists. Because it is backed up by people of this caliber, whether as users or developers. Even the trolls and flame wars here (not in NO way implying that this thread was one!) make more intelligent and enjoyable reading than in any other forum I go. In my humble user opinion, that is why FreeBSD is more than relevant. To me, at least, is indispensable, both as a tool and as a reference for every other OS in existence. I am not arguing here that my preference is better than anybody else's. FreeBSD itself is wide enough to fit a huge number of them. This universe expands even more if you add the other BSDs. This is just a thank-you note and for sharing a simple permanent feeling of relief for having made a good choice. The only offense that keeps coming back is the post's subject. Best regards, -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) On Monday 18 July 2011 17:31:41 Polytropon wrote: On Mon, 18 Jul 2011 15:48:46 -0400, Jerry wrote: On Mon, 18 Jul 2011 16:58:08 +0200 Polytropon articulated: Here the circle closes: Without STANDARDS, you wouldn't be able to view the digital pictures you took with a camera 10 years ago because the manufacturer decided to use a proprietary image format without any documentation, as you should only use the software supplied by the manufacturer. Dropping program version X and advertising version Y with the new models of the digital camera, and everything you'll have is a bunch of files nobody can read anymore. You can also see this in computer media, although with a lower half-life period. If you want to get into the future, rely on established, open and free standards. In my opinion, there is no alternative. Everything else would just increase costs (e. g. migration costs). But there are fields of use where costs simply doesn't matter (as it seems). I apologize for cherry picking this; however, your analysis is so faulty that I was force to. You camera analogy is simply absurd. I wanted it to be understood as an analogy. You were aware that Kodak dropped the C22 development process decades ago which effectively make all films designed for that process useless. It also spelled then end of GAF, but that is another story. KODACHROME Film was discontinues after a 74 year run. Actually, it was created due to Kodak's inability to properly stabilize the layers in the color film it was trying to create; but that is another story. I still have several collector's grade cameras that used films such as the 116 and 616 designations. These films were discontinued in 1984. You're talking hardware (film material) here, not software. Your analogy illustrates how technology does disappear. It gets more and more complicated working with film material, as digital cameras allow you to do all the things that you could do with expensive cameras only in the past. Even professionals have switched (of course to expensive and therefor professional camera models), both for photographing and for movies. In software, see planned obsolescense and digital medieval times (digital middleage) and movements that want to keep witnesses of our today's culture. This means you will _always_ have to judge: Need a short-term solution that is the best for a short term, or need a long- term solution that is good (or even just good enough) for a longer period of time. Sloppily engineered and halfway done solutions can - by means of marketing - be sold for the first kind of products quite easily, and constantness is not an important topic for the main markets (home consumers). Should I sue Kodak, or any other manufacturer for their failure to continue support for these devices? When wan the last time you purchased a new Polaroid? News Flash: It was discontinued. Now, can you guess why? Perhaps you have noticed people using cameras that don't apparently use any film. You might want to investigate that further. You will find that newer technology supersedes and eventually obsoletes older technology. It's _always_ that way. Interestingly, some oldest technology still prevails. There are still books made of paper even though there are alternatives. In the last year, more paper was used and printed than in the year before, and the trend
Re: Lennart Poettering: BSD Isn't Relevant Anymore
Hi; First of all, forgive me for top posting but I don't want to disturb the debate between Jerry and Polytropon. In fact, I enjoyed it so much that I saved it in separate folder. It is just plain good reading, not only because of the issue at hand, but also because of the elegance and intelligence of the arguments presented by each of them, and because it was delightful to notice how their cultural backgrounds influence their presentations, to the point where even when using harsh words didn't carry offense. I firmly believe that this is why FreeBSD exists. Because it is backed up by people of this caliber, whether as users or developers. Even the trolls and flame wars here (not in NO way implying that this thread was one!) make more intelligent and enjoyable reading than in any other forum I go. In my humble user opinion, that is why FreeBSD is more than relevant. To me, at least, is indispensable, both as a tool and as a reference for every other OS in existence. I am not arguing here that my preference is better than anybody else's. FreeBSD itself is wide enough to fit a huge number of them. This universe expands even more if you add the other BSDs. This is just a thank-you note and for sharing a simple permanent feeling of relief for having made a good choice. The only offense that keeps coming back is the post's subject. Best regards, -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) On Monday 18 July 2011 17:31:41 Polytropon wrote: On Mon, 18 Jul 2011 15:48:46 -0400, Jerry wrote: On Mon, 18 Jul 2011 16:58:08 +0200 Polytropon articulated: Here the circle closes: Without STANDARDS, you wouldn't be able to view the digital pictures you took with a camera 10 years ago because the manufacturer decided to use a proprietary image format without any documentation, as you should only use the software supplied by the manufacturer. Dropping program version X and advertising version Y with the new models of the digital camera, and everything you'll have is a bunch of files nobody can read anymore. You can also see this in computer media, although with a lower half-life period. If you want to get into the future, rely on established, open and free standards. In my opinion, there is no alternative. Everything else would just increase costs (e. g. migration costs). But there are fields of use where costs simply doesn't matter (as it seems). I apologize for cherry picking this; however, your analysis is so faulty that I was force to. You camera analogy is simply absurd. I wanted it to be understood as an analogy. You were aware that Kodak dropped the C22 development process decades ago which effectively make all films designed for that process useless. It also spelled then end of GAF, but that is another story. KODACHROME Film was discontinues after a 74 year run. Actually, it was created due to Kodak's inability to properly stabilize the layers in the color film it was trying to create; but that is another story. I still have several collector's grade cameras that used films such as the 116 and 616 designations. These films were discontinued in 1984. You're talking hardware (film material) here, not software. Your analogy illustrates how technology does disappear. It gets more and more complicated working with film material, as digital cameras allow you to do all the things that you could do with expensive cameras only in the past. Even professionals have switched (of course to expensive and therefor professional camera models), both for photographing and for movies. In software, see planned obsolescense and digital medieval times (digital middleage) and movements that want to keep witnesses of our today's culture. This means you will _always_ have to judge: Need a short-term solution that is the best for a short term, or need a long- term solution that is good (or even just good enough) for a longer period of time. Sloppily engineered and halfway done solutions can - by means of marketing - be sold for the first kind of products quite easily, and constantness is not an important topic for the main markets (home consumers). Should I sue Kodak, or any other manufacturer for their failure to continue support for these devices? When wan the last time you purchased a new Polaroid? News Flash: It was discontinued. Now, can you guess why? Perhaps you have noticed people using cameras that don't apparently use any film. You might want to investigate that further. You will find that newer technology supersedes and eventually obsoletes older technology. It's _always_ that way. Interestingly, some oldest technology still prevails. There are still books made of paper even though there are alternatives. In the last year, more paper was used and printed than in the year before, and the trend continues
Re: Lennart Poettering: BSD Isn't Relevant Anymore
On Sunday 17 July 2011 10:13:13 C. Bergström wrote: In the specific case about Gnome - really if you care so much then you can submit patches and contribute. If nobody is willing to do the work (scratch the itch) then ultimately it really doesn't matter. I hope gnome does do this.. Maybe then more people would forget about it and focus on making KDE better ;) YES !! I hope so too. -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: help
On Thursday 14 July 2011 20:06:06 Erman Zülfükaroğlu wrote: Hi , I try to mount free bsd to Windows sharing folder. mount_smbs -I 10.0.0.x /10.0.0.x/share folder name /mnt/mount folder but i can't. mount_smbfs=unable open to connection syserr=connection refused samba installed. Please help , Thanks ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org Which windows version? Is the folder shared properly? Win 7 is pretty rough on sharing folders. -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Problem with PF reply-to
Hi; I have the following scenario. FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE #0: Thu May 19 19:53:59 BRT 2011 i386 I want to be able to connect to any of the 2 external IPs this machine has. ### pf.conf excerpt ext_if1 = sis0 (1M link. default gateway) ext_if2 = rl0 (2M link) aln_if = dc0 (Internal LAN) ext_gw1 = A.A.A.A ext_gw2 = B.B.B.B my_ext_ip1 = a.a.a.a my_ext_ip2 = b.b.b.b nat on $ext_if1 from any to any - $my_ext_ip1 port 1024:65535 nat on $ext_if2 from any to any - $my_ext_ip2 port 1024:65535 1) - # balance the load pass in log quick on $aln_if route-to ($ext_if2 $ext_gw2) from \ $aln_if:network to any flags S/SA keep state tag to_out probability 70% pass in log quick on $aln_if route-to ($ext_if1 $ext_gw1) from \ $aln_if:network to any flags S/SA keep state tag to_out 2) - # allow ssh on ext_ifs a)pass in log quick on $ext_if1 inet proto tcp from any to any port $SshPort \ flags S/SA modulate state (max 30, source-track rule, max-src-nodes 10,\ max-src-states 2, max-src-conn 2, max-src-conn-rate 2/60, overload banned) b)pass in log quick on $ext_if2 reply-to ($ext_if2 $ext_gw2) inet proto tcp \ from any to any port $SshPort flags S/SA keep state (max 30, source-track \ rule, max-src-nodes 10, max-src-states 2, max-src-conn 2, max-src-conn-rate\ 2/60, overload banned) ( RULE 8 ) [snip][snip].. 3) - pass out quick on $ext_if1 route-to ($ext_if2 $ext_gw2) from $ext_if2 to any pass out quick on $ext_if2 route-to ($ext_if1 $ext_gw1) from $ext_if1 to any Also tried: pass out quick on $ext_if1 route-to ($ext_if1 $ext_gw1) from $ext_if1 to any pass out quick on $ext_if2 route-to ($ext_if2 $ext_gw2) from $ext_if2 to any block log all ( RULE 163 ) ### end of pf.conf excerpt Everything under 1) works fine. Under 2), a) works, b) not working. When I try to connect to $SshPort through the 2M link (b.b.b.b). I connect to the server, but the return packet neither obeys the reply-to on rule b), nor matches any of the pass outs under 3), and goes straight to the block rule. as you can see bellow. [$] tcpdump -n -e -ttt -i pflog0 host 187.113.99.63 (my home IP) Packet arrives and matches rule b)/8 and should create a state; 00:00:00.00 rule 8/0(match): pass in on rl0: 187.113.99.63.25806 b.b.b.b.22: [|tcp] but... 00:00:00.000108 rule 163/0(match): block out on sis0: a.a.a.a.8947 187.113.99.63.25806: [|tcp] 00:00:03.57 rule 163/0(match): block out on sis0: a.a.a.a.65060 187.113.99.63.25806: [|tcp] 00:00:03.199931 rule 163/0(match): block out on sis0: a.a.a.a..20213 187.113.99.63.25806: [|tcp] 00:00:03.199618 rule 163/0(match): block out on sis0: a.a.a.a..19748 187.113.99.63.25806: [|tcp] 00:00:03.200044 rule 163/0(match): block out on sis0: a.a.a.a..1600 187.113.99.63.25806: [|tcp] 00:00:03.199767 rule 163/0(match): block out on sis0: a.a.a.a..45513 187.113.99.63.25806: [|tcp] 00:00:06.205048 rule 163/0(match): block out on sis0: a.a.a.a..17925 187.113.99.63.25806: [|tcp] it tries to go back to me on the wrong interface (sis0 and NOT rl0), wrong ip (a.a.a.a and NOT b.b.b.b), and from several wrong port numbers, not port 22. Questions: 1) sshd is listening on *.22. I know that the default gateway is not on rl0 but isn't that what reply-to is supposed to beat? If I understood correctly, wasn't the reply-to supposed to make the packet go back throught the specified ($ext_if2 $ext_gw2)? 2) Wasn't a state created when the pass rule b)/8 matched? if so, where is it? Where am I doing wrong here? Thanks for any hints. -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Problem with PF reply-to [SOLVED]
On Wednesday 13 July 2011 10:26:59 Mario Lobo wrote: Hi; I have the following scenario. FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE #0: Thu May 19 19:53:59 BRT 2011 i386 I want to be able to connect to any of the 2 external IPs this machine has. ### pf.conf excerpt ext_if1 = sis0 (1M link. default gateway) ext_if2 = rl0 (2M link) aln_if = dc0 (Internal LAN) ext_gw1 = A.A.A.A ext_gw2 = B.B.B.B my_ext_ip1 = a.a.a.a my_ext_ip2 = b.b.b.b nat on $ext_if1 from any to any - $my_ext_ip1 port 1024:65535 nat on $ext_if2 from any to any - $my_ext_ip2 port 1024:65535 1) - # balance the load pass in log quick on $aln_if route-to ($ext_if2 $ext_gw2) from \ $aln_if:network to any flags S/SA keep state tag to_out probability 70% pass in log quick on $aln_if route-to ($ext_if1 $ext_gw1) from \ $aln_if:network to any flags S/SA keep state tag to_out 2) - # allow ssh on ext_ifs a)pass in log quick on $ext_if1 inet proto tcp from any to any port $SshPort \ flags S/SA modulate state (max 30, source-track rule, max-src-nodes 10,\ max-src-states 2, max-src-conn 2, max-src-conn-rate 2/60, overload banned) b)pass in log quick on $ext_if2 reply-to ($ext_if2 $ext_gw2) inet proto tcp \ from any to any port $SshPort flags S/SA keep state (max 30, source-track \ rule, max-src-nodes 10, max-src-states 2, max-src-conn 2, max-src-conn-rate\ 2/60, overload banned) ( RULE 8 ) [snip][snip].. 3) - pass out quick on $ext_if1 route-to ($ext_if2 $ext_gw2) from $ext_if2 to any pass out quick on $ext_if2 route-to ($ext_if1 $ext_gw1) from $ext_if1 to any Also tried: pass out quick on $ext_if1 route-to ($ext_if1 $ext_gw1) from $ext_if1 to any pass out quick on $ext_if2 route-to ($ext_if2 $ext_gw2) from $ext_if2 to any block log all ( RULE 163 ) ### end of pf.conf excerpt Everything under 1) works fine. Under 2), a) works, b) not working. When I try to connect to $SshPort through the 2M link (b.b.b.b). I connect to the server, but the return packet neither obeys the reply-to on rule b), nor matches any of the pass outs under 3), and goes straight to the block rule. as you can see bellow. [$] tcpdump -n -e -ttt -i pflog0 host 187.113.99.63 (my home IP) Packet arrives and matches rule b)/8 and should create a state; 00:00:00.00 rule 8/0(match): pass in on rl0: 187.113.99.63.25806 b.b.b.b.22: [|tcp] but... 00:00:00.000108 rule 163/0(match): block out on sis0: a.a.a.a.8947 187.113.99.63.25806: [|tcp] 00:00:03.57 rule 163/0(match): block out on sis0: a.a.a.a.65060 187.113.99.63.25806: [|tcp] 00:00:03.199931 rule 163/0(match): block out on sis0: a.a.a.a..20213 187.113.99.63.25806: [|tcp] 00:00:03.199618 rule 163/0(match): block out on sis0: a.a.a.a..19748 187.113.99.63.25806: [|tcp] 00:00:03.200044 rule 163/0(match): block out on sis0: a.a.a.a..1600 187.113.99.63.25806: [|tcp] 00:00:03.199767 rule 163/0(match): block out on sis0: a.a.a.a..45513 187.113.99.63.25806: [|tcp] 00:00:06.205048 rule 163/0(match): block out on sis0: a.a.a.a..17925 187.113.99.63.25806: [|tcp] it tries to go back to me on the wrong interface (sis0 and NOT rl0), wrong ip (a.a.a.a and NOT b.b.b.b), and from several wrong port numbers, not port 22. Questions: 1) sshd is listening on *.22. I know that the default gateway is not on rl0 but isn't that what reply-to is supposed to beat? If I understood correctly, wasn't the reply-to supposed to make the packet go back throught the specified ($ext_if2 $ext_gw2)? 2) Wasn't a state created when the pass rule b)/8 matched? if so, where is it? Where am I doing wrong here? Thanks for any hints. Never mind ! I solved the problem after finding this very enlightening document: http://www.mmacleod.ca/blog/2011/06/source-based-routing-with-freebsd-using- multiple-routing-table/ I followed it and it all works beautifully now. -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Virtualbox on 8.2 64-bit (cont)
On Monday 13 June 2011 21:14:05 Rob wrote: On 6/9/11 4:55 PM, Mario Lobo wrote: On Thursday 09 June 2011 10:49:37 Rob wrote: On 6/6/11 8:39 PM, Mario Lobo wrote: On Monday 06 June 2011 17:56:53 Rob wrote: I was attempting to install virtualbox on my 8.2-p2 64-bit system this weekend, and hit a rather curious situation. The pre-packaged version of virtualbox retrievable by pkg_add is 3.2.12 (which looks in ports/amd64/packages-8.2-release). Poking around on the ftp server, I see that packages-8.1-release also has a 3.x version, but packages-8-stable has the latest 4.0.8. I went to look in ports, which contains 4.0.8, and build it myself but I got an error saying I need to have the 32-bit libraries installed in order to build virtualbox. So, my question is 2-fold: 1) What is the reason the 64-bit pre-packaged version of virtualbox is still at the 3.x version? Would there be a problem with installing the packages (virtualbox and kernel module) from packages-8-stable? 2) How do I build virtualbox 4.0.8 on a 64-bit system w/o the 32-bit libs. Is that possible? Searching around has produced old e-mail threads indicating this was a problem as of 2 or so years ago with the 3.x release. If it's not possible to build w/o the 32-bit libs, what do I need to install? Rob You need to rebuild your kernel with options COMPAT_FREEBSD32# Compatible with i386 binaries included. And as per the port's error message: cd /usr/src; make build32 install32; /etc/rc.d/ldconfig restart I noticed that when I tried to build the ports, but I don't have anything in /usr/src and no information was given as to what packages/src I needed to install. I'd like to avoid diverging from the stock release kernel for upgrade simplicity. What exactly does that do? Will it introduce upgrade complexity (ie will I have to upgrade these libs before I upgrade the kernel or some such)? Rob To remain with the same kernel you installed, you must install the source tree from the same CD/DVD you used for installation. You will have to run sysinstal and go to Configure Do post-install configuration of FreeBSD then Distributions Install additional distribution sets then mark [ ] src Sources for everything Choose the CDROM as installation media. After that you'll have all the sources on your HD and can proceed to the compilation of the 32 libs. If the sources are from the same CD you installed the system, they will be in sync with your kernel. No upgrade issues. What is that command doing though? It's building what from src? What is the output of build32? I assume it's not a kernel. No. Its JUST the 32 bit libraries. make build32 builds the 32bit libraries. It simply outputs the compilation process. make install32 installs the 32bit libraries. Same thing but for the install process. Also, do you know the difference between pre-built packages on the freebsd ftp server in packages-8.2-release vs packages-8-stable? Well, IF you installed the source tree from the SAME cd which you installed the FreeBSD you have now, there won't be any problems. You said you want to keep the stock kernel you installed so I assume that you haven't updated anything from the internet. You MUST install the source tree from the same DVD/CD from where you installed your running kernel! The diference is that the packages are meant to run on their respective version. I believe that packages that don't rely on a specific thing of one version should run without problems on both. But this is not normal or even needed at all, specially because it is so easy to bring everything uptodate to the same version. -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Virtualbox on 8.2 64-bit (cont)
On Thursday 09 June 2011 10:49:37 Rob wrote: On 6/6/11 8:39 PM, Mario Lobo wrote: On Monday 06 June 2011 17:56:53 Rob wrote: I was attempting to install virtualbox on my 8.2-p2 64-bit system this weekend, and hit a rather curious situation. The pre-packaged version of virtualbox retrievable by pkg_add is 3.2.12 (which looks in ports/amd64/packages-8.2-release). Poking around on the ftp server, I see that packages-8.1-release also has a 3.x version, but packages-8-stable has the latest 4.0.8. I went to look in ports, which contains 4.0.8, and build it myself but I got an error saying I need to have the 32-bit libraries installed in order to build virtualbox. So, my question is 2-fold: 1) What is the reason the 64-bit pre-packaged version of virtualbox is still at the 3.x version? Would there be a problem with installing the packages (virtualbox and kernel module) from packages-8-stable? 2) How do I build virtualbox 4.0.8 on a 64-bit system w/o the 32-bit libs. Is that possible? Searching around has produced old e-mail threads indicating this was a problem as of 2 or so years ago with the 3.x release. If it's not possible to build w/o the 32-bit libs, what do I need to install? Rob You need to rebuild your kernel with options COMPAT_FREEBSD32# Compatible with i386 binaries included. And as per the port's error message: cd /usr/src; make build32 install32; /etc/rc.d/ldconfig restart I noticed that when I tried to build the ports, but I don't have anything in /usr/src and no information was given as to what packages/src I needed to install. I'd like to avoid diverging from the stock release kernel for upgrade simplicity. What exactly does that do? Will it introduce upgrade complexity (ie will I have to upgrade these libs before I upgrade the kernel or some such)? Rob To remain with the same kernel you installed, you must install the source tree from the same CD/DVD you used for installation. You will have to run sysinstal and go to Configure Do post-install configuration of FreeBSD then Distributions Install additional distribution sets then mark [ ] src Sources for everything Choose the CDROM as installation media. After that you'll have all the sources on your HD and can proceed to the compilation of the 32 libs. If the sources are from the same CD you installed the system, they will be in sync with your kernel. No upgrade issues. -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Virtualbox on 8.2 64-bit
On Monday 06 June 2011 17:56:53 Rob wrote: I was attempting to install virtualbox on my 8.2-p2 64-bit system this weekend, and hit a rather curious situation. The pre-packaged version of virtualbox retrievable by pkg_add is 3.2.12 (which looks in ports/amd64/packages-8.2-release). Poking around on the ftp server, I see that packages-8.1-release also has a 3.x version, but packages-8-stable has the latest 4.0.8. I went to look in ports, which contains 4.0.8, and build it myself but I got an error saying I need to have the 32-bit libraries installed in order to build virtualbox. So, my question is 2-fold: 1) What is the reason the 64-bit pre-packaged version of virtualbox is still at the 3.x version? Would there be a problem with installing the packages (virtualbox and kernel module) from packages-8-stable? 2) How do I build virtualbox 4.0.8 on a 64-bit system w/o the 32-bit libs. Is that possible? Searching around has produced old e-mail threads indicating this was a problem as of 2 or so years ago with the 3.x release. If it's not possible to build w/o the 32-bit libs, what do I need to install? Rob You need to rebuild your kernel with options COMPAT_FREEBSD32# Compatible with i386 binaries included. -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Virtualbox on 8.2 64-bit (cont)
On Monday 06 June 2011 17:56:53 Rob wrote: I was attempting to install virtualbox on my 8.2-p2 64-bit system this weekend, and hit a rather curious situation. The pre-packaged version of virtualbox retrievable by pkg_add is 3.2.12 (which looks in ports/amd64/packages-8.2-release). Poking around on the ftp server, I see that packages-8.1-release also has a 3.x version, but packages-8-stable has the latest 4.0.8. I went to look in ports, which contains 4.0.8, and build it myself but I got an error saying I need to have the 32-bit libraries installed in order to build virtualbox. So, my question is 2-fold: 1) What is the reason the 64-bit pre-packaged version of virtualbox is still at the 3.x version? Would there be a problem with installing the packages (virtualbox and kernel module) from packages-8-stable? 2) How do I build virtualbox 4.0.8 on a 64-bit system w/o the 32-bit libs. Is that possible? Searching around has produced old e-mail threads indicating this was a problem as of 2 or so years ago with the 3.x release. If it's not possible to build w/o the 32-bit libs, what do I need to install? Rob You need to rebuild your kernel with options COMPAT_FREEBSD32# Compatible with i386 binaries included. And as per the port's error message: cd /usr/src; make build32 install32; /etc/rc.d/ldconfig restart -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Virtualbox on 8.2 64-bit
On Monday 06 June 2011 22:31:30 Rob wrote: On 6/6/11 8:13 PM, Mario Lobo wrote: On Monday 06 June 2011 17:56:53 Rob wrote: I was attempting to install virtualbox on my 8.2-p2 64-bit system this weekend, and hit a rather curious situation. The pre-packaged version of virtualbox retrievable by pkg_add is 3.2.12 (which looks in ports/amd64/packages-8.2-release). Poking around on the ftp server, I see that packages-8.1-release also has a 3.x version, but packages-8-stable has the latest 4.0.8. I went to look in ports, which contains 4.0.8, and build it myself but I got an error saying I need to have the 32-bit libraries installed in order to build virtualbox. So, my question is 2-fold: 1) What is the reason the 64-bit pre-packaged version of virtualbox is still at the 3.x version? Would there be a problem with installing the packages (virtualbox and kernel module) from packages-8-stable? 2) How do I build virtualbox 4.0.8 on a 64-bit system w/o the 32-bit libs. Is that possible? Searching around has produced old e-mail threads indicating this was a problem as of 2 or so years ago with the 3.x release. If it's not possible to build w/o the 32-bit libs, what do I need to install? Rob You need to rebuild your kernel with options COMPAT_FREEBSD32# Compatible with i386 binaries included. I'm running the stock 8.2 kernel. Is that option compiled into the kernel? Where do I find the options that are enabled in the stock kernel? I believe the stock kernel follows the GENERIC conf file which DOES include the COMPAT_FREEBSD32 option but I'm not 100% sure. Maybe someone on the list could confirm that. Also, does COMPAT_FREEBSD32 mean I don't need the 32-bit libs for compilation, or that the kernel will run binaries compiled for 32-bit systems? If the later, then I'll still need to install the 32-bit version of the libraries in order to build, right? Rob You do need to compile the libraries as per my follow up post. -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Funny thing with portsclean
On Monday 30 May 2011 01:20:42 Robert Simmons wrote: Sorry, I didn't mention why. You need use -DD if you don't want that to happen, and you want it to follow installed packages as well. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org A !! It was my bad then. Thanks for the previous explanation also, Robert. -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: editors/openoffice.org-3
On Monday 30 May 2011 12:29:13 Jamie Paul Griffin wrote: Hello the build of this port fails due to a problem with the 'moz' module: ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making /usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-3/work/000330_m20/moz [ ... ] I found a thread sent to freebsd-openoffice@ earlier this month where several people said they had experienced this problem, the last message in it was dated 15 May 2011. No update after and no indication when the problem might be fixed. I wondered if anyone here has any more information about this? best wishes, jamie ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org I just went ahead and compiled WITHOUT_MOZILLA. The error didn't show and OO compiled, installed and runs fine. I must say that I don't know precisely what functionality I am loosing with this though. -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Funny thing with portsclean
-runtime-4.4.11.1 Libraries for KDE-PIM applications kdepimlibs-4.6.2Libraries for KDE-PIM applications kdeplasma-addons-4.6.2 Extra plasmoids for KDE4 kdesdk-4.6.2KDE Software Development Kit kdetoys-4.6.2 Collection of entertaining programs for KDE kdeutils-4.6.2 Utilities for the KDE4 integrated X11 Desktop Is portsclean doing something wrong here or am I missing something? isn't it supposed to cross info with the installed packeges database before deleting the distfiles, even if you csuped the ports tree? -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Ekiga FreeBSD (for a future without Skype)
On Sunday 22 May 2011 14:10:33 Matthias Apitz wrote: Hello, Now, as M$ bought Skype, we should stop wining for a native Skype client for FreeBSD and should prepare us for the time when M$ will integrate Skype into its desktop and stop deliver binaries for Linux; Behold! The corpse is still warm and it's already starting !! http://www.zdnet.com/blog/networking/microsoft-skype-breaks-open-source- partnership/?tag=nl.e550 -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: pptpd problem (re-post) [SOLVED]
On Tuesday 17 May 2011 19:14:05 Lokadamus wrote: Am 15.05.2011 20:03, schrieb Mario Lobo: Sorry for the re-post but I am really lost here. Any hints, clues, pointers, opinions would be appreciated. I have a VPN server on FBSD 8.1. The vpn closes fine. But as soon as I start doing something with an inside LAN machine i.e. an RDP session, I get this: May 14 12:46:06 suporte pptpd[1958]: GRE: xmit failed from decaps_hdlc: No buffer space available and the VPN tunnel drops. I googled a lot for it but I didn't find any thing that could help. The system WAS working OK before. I tried everything I could think of. Could anyone help? Thanks, Help this? http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=1528 Your values are: net.inet.tcp.recvbuf_inc=16384 net.inet.tcp.recvbuf_max=16777216 net.inet.tcp.sendbuf_inc=8192 net.inet.tcp.sendbuf_max=16777216 I got those settings from http://fasterdata.es.net/fasterdata/host-tuning/freebsd/ Is ping working? Everything is working!. Even the VPN tunnels work. I just can't do much once in it. Have you upgrade to FreeBSD 8.2? Nope. But I will soon. Production machine. Have to wait for a window. Sorry for my bad english :( Your English is fine! Anyway, I switched from poptop to mpd5 and the problem went away! magic! I openned 3 RDP sessions through the tunnel and it hanged in there. Thank you for replying! -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
pptpd problem (re-post)
Sorry for the re-post but I am really lost here. Any hints, clues, pointers, opinions would be appreciated. I have a VPN server on FBSD 8.1. The vpn closes fine. But as soon as I start doing something with an inside LAN machine i.e. an RDP session, I get this: May 14 12:46:06 suporte pptpd[1958]: GRE: xmit failed from decaps_hdlc: No buffer space available and the VPN tunnel drops. I googled a lot for it but I didn't find any thing that could help. The system WAS working OK before. I tried everything I could think of. Could anyone help? Thanks, -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) pptpd: poptop-1.3.4_2 System: FreeBSD 8.1-STABLE #0: Mon Feb 28 20:47:00 BRT 2011 i386 last pid: 2145; load averages: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 28 processes: 1 running, 27 sleeping CPU: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.0% system, 1.1% interrupt, 98.9% idle Mem: 15M Active, 13M Inact, 58M Wired, 28K Cache, 44M Buf, 1892M Free Swap: 4000M Total, 4000M Free sysctl.conf: security.bsd.see_other_uids=0 security.bsd.see_other_gids=0 debug.cpufreq.lowest=400 kern.maxfiles=65536 kern.maxfilesperproc=32768 kern.maxvnodes=60 kern.ipc.shmmax=67108864 kern.ipc.shmall=16384 kern.ipc.nmbclusters=32768 kern.ipc.somaxconn=32768 net.inet.tcp.rfc1323=1 net.inet.tcp.drop_synfin=1 net.inet.tcp.sendspace=65536 net.inet.tcp.recvspace=65536 net.inet.tcp.blackhole=2 net.inet.udp.blackhole=1 net.inet.icmp.drop_redirect=1 net.inet.icmp.icmplim_output=0 net.inet.icmp.icmplim=2000 net.inet.tcp.path_mtu_discovery=0 net.inet.tcp.recvbuf_auto=1 net.inet.tcp.recvbuf_inc=16384 net.inet.tcp.recvbuf_max=16777216 net.inet.tcp.sendbuf_auto=1 net.inet.tcp.sendbuf_inc=8192 net.inet.tcp.sendbuf_max=16777216 pf.conf(relevant rules): #--- Allow vpns from anywhere to anywhere pass log quick on $ext_if inet proto gre all queue (ssh_bulk, ack) pass log quick on $ext_if inet proto tcp from any to any port pptp flags S/SA queue (ssh_bulk, ack) pass log quick on $aln_if inet proto gre all queue (ssh_bulk, ack) pass log quick on $aln_if inet proto tcp from any to any port pptp flags S/SA queue (ssh_bulk, ack) options.pptpd: proxyarp lock name ppp.conf: default: set timeout 1200 # set log Phase Chat LCP IPCP CCP TUN Command Connect set log Phase Chat TUN Connect set dial set login set ifaddr 172.16.3.200/24 172.16.3.201-172.16.3.239 255.255.255.0 set server /tmp/tun%d 0177 # set lqrperiod 20 # set echoperiod 20 # enable lqr echo pptp: disable ipv6cp pap chap disable deflate pred1 deny deflate pred1 enable proxy accept dns set mtu max 1024 set dns 172.16.3.133 set nbns 172.16.3.133 enable MSChapV2 enable mppe set mppe * stateful set radius /etc/ppp/radius.conf set rad_alive 60 allow mode direct ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
pptpd problem
Hi; I have a VPN server on FBSD 8.1. The vpn closes fine. But as soon as I start doing something with an inside LAN machine i.e. an RDP session, I get this: May 14 12:46:06 suporte pptpd[1958]: GRE: xmit failed from decaps_hdlc: No buffer space available and the VPN tunnel drops. I googled a lot for it but I didn't find any thing that could help. The system WAS working OK before. I tried everything I could think of. Could anyone help? Thanks, -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) pptpd: poptop-1.3.4_2 System: FreeBSD 8.1-STABLE #0: Mon Feb 28 20:47:00 BRT 2011 i386 last pid: 2145; load averages: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 28 processes: 1 running, 27 sleeping CPU: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.0% system, 1.1% interrupt, 98.9% idle Mem: 15M Active, 13M Inact, 58M Wired, 28K Cache, 44M Buf, 1892M Free Swap: 4000M Total, 4000M Free sysctl.conf: security.bsd.see_other_uids=0 security.bsd.see_other_gids=0 debug.cpufreq.lowest=400 kern.maxfiles=65536 kern.maxfilesperproc=32768 kern.maxvnodes=60 kern.ipc.shmmax=67108864 kern.ipc.shmall=16384 kern.ipc.nmbclusters=32768 kern.ipc.somaxconn=32768 net.inet.tcp.rfc1323=1 net.inet.tcp.drop_synfin=1 net.inet.tcp.sendspace=65536 net.inet.tcp.recvspace=65536 net.inet.tcp.blackhole=2 net.inet.udp.blackhole=1 net.inet.icmp.drop_redirect=1 net.inet.icmp.icmplim_output=0 net.inet.icmp.icmplim=2000 net.inet.tcp.path_mtu_discovery=0 net.inet.tcp.recvbuf_auto=1 net.inet.tcp.recvbuf_inc=16384 net.inet.tcp.recvbuf_max=16777216 net.inet.tcp.sendbuf_auto=1 net.inet.tcp.sendbuf_inc=8192 net.inet.tcp.sendbuf_max=16777216 pf.conf(relevant rules): #--- Allow vpns from anywhere to anywhere pass log quick on $ext_if inet proto gre all queue (ssh_bulk, ack) pass log quick on $ext_if inet proto tcp from any to any port pptp flags S/SA queue (ssh_bulk, ack) pass log quick on $aln_if inet proto gre all queue (ssh_bulk, ack) pass log quick on $aln_if inet proto tcp from any to any port pptp flags S/SA queue (ssh_bulk, ack) options.pptpd: proxyarp lock name ppp.conf: default: set timeout 1200 # set log Phase Chat LCP IPCP CCP TUN Command Connect set log Phase Chat TUN Connect set dial set login set ifaddr 172.16.3.200/24 172.16.3.201-172.16.3.239 255.255.255.0 set server /tmp/tun%d 0177 # set lqrperiod 20 # set echoperiod 20 # enable lqr echo pptp: disable ipv6cp pap chap disable deflate pred1 deny deflate pred1 enable proxy accept dns set mtu max 1024 set dns 172.16.3.133 set nbns 172.16.3.133 enable MSChapV2 enable mppe set mppe * stateful set radius /etc/ppp/radius.conf set rad_alive 60 allow mode direct ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Skyip? question
On Wednesday 11 May 2011 23:24:11 Polytropon wrote: And keep in mind the data in the background: WHO communi- cates? WHERE does he communicate from, with WHOM, WHEN? Tech- nology allows answering questions even about WHAT has been spoken. Relations between individuals and there interests can be concluded from such communication profiles. They are of high value for advertising and industry propaganda mechanisms. And a LOT of governments. -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: (8.2) amd64 + linuxulator + nvidia driver is it stable ?
On Tuesday 10 May 2011 15:21:07 Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote: On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Ivan Klymenko fi...@ukr.net wrote: В Tue, 10 May 2011 17:31:53 +0200 Patrick Lamaiziere patf...@davenulle.org пишет: Hi, I've got a new box running 8.2-stable with amd64 + linuxulator + nvidia driver. Quite often when watching video on youtube the box freeze (no panic). Are there some known problems with this kind of configuration on amd64? (Works fine on my old laptop using 8.2/i386) I don't know where is problem, but one time the machine crashed just after a pkill of npviewer.bin (they were in the futex state), so it could be the linuxulator? I have encountered in the system exactly the same problem uname -a FreeBSD nonamehost 9.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #0 r221598: Sat May 7 17:28:18 EEST 2011 ivan@nonamehost:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/mk9 amd64 pciconf -lv|grep Ge device = 'Geforce 8400M GS (unknown)' pkg_info|grep nvidi nvidia-driver-270.41.06 NVidia graphics card binary drivers for hardware OpenGL ren dmesg|grep NVRM NVRM: Xid (:01:00): 13, 000a 8297 19d0 003c 0100 they were observed for nearly all nvidia drivers for amd64... I tried to change the different options: setenv VDPAU_NVIDIA_NO_OVERLAY=1 - ~/.cshrc Option Xinerama False and Option Xinerama 0 - /etc/X11/xorg.conf cat /etc/adobe/mms.cfg OverrideGPUValidation=false AutoUpdateDisable=true EnableLinuxHWVideoDecode=0 FullScreenDisable=false and it seems to me it helped for flashplayer... but the situation as a whole wants the best, because these problems continue with using VDPAU so I'm leaning that cause these problems in drivers... sorry for my english... ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org I have had the same problem as well in the past when I tried killing npviewer.bin . Also using an NVidia card on amd64... Thanks ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org Are you guys using nspluginwrapper-devel? Since I started using it I have no more freezes in firefox and no more dangling npviewer.bin processes. YouTube plays fine for as many videos as I want. By the way, I never experienced system freezes even when I was using a non- devel wrapper. Only firefox froze with watching flash videos. All I had to do was to kill it and kill the npviewer.bins. My system: FreeBSD Papi 8.2-STABLE Tue May 3 13:17:39 BRT 2011 amd64 NVIDIA Driver Version: 270.41.06 device = 'NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT (G92)' -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: (8.2) amd64 + linuxulator + nvidia driver is it stable ?
On Tuesday 10 May 2011 20:09:37 Mark Felder wrote: On Tue, 10 May 2011 16:21:39 -0500, Mario Lobo l...@bsd.com.br wrote: Are you guys using nspluginwrapper-devel? Hi Mario, It happens to me with Opera, Chromium (from chromium.hybridsource.org), and with Firefox via regular nspluginwrapper. Regards, Mark ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org You should try the devel version. -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Status of 8-CURRENT
Forgive my lame question but where can I check which version 8-CURRENT is without updating my sources (i.e. 8.x-RC1, 8.x-RELEASE, etc)? Thanks, -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Status of 8-CURRENT
On Tuesday 12 April 2011 11:52:59 Peter Ulrich Kruppa wrote: On http://www.freebsd.org/releng/index.html you will find a list of available versions and their state. Hope that helps Peter. This is what I needed! Thanks, Peter! -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Status of 8-CURRENT
On Tuesday 12 April 2011 11:33:08 Paul B. Mahol wrote: On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Mario Lobo l...@bsd.com.br wrote: Forgive my lame question but where can I check which version 8-CURRENT is without updating my sources (i.e. 8.x-RC1, 8.x-RELEASE, etc)? There is no 8-CURRENT any more. Now it is 9-CURRENT. Sorry! I meant RELENG_8. -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Status of 8-CURRENT
On Tuesday 12 April 2011 12:15:27 Ruben de Groot wrote: Here's a nice oneliner ;) fetch -qo - 'http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh?rev=.;onl y_with_tag=RELENG_8;content-type=text%2Fplain' | awk '/^REVISION=/ || /^BRANCH=/' REVISION=8.2 BRANCH=STABLE Ruben Wow! this is exactly it ! Allright, Ruben ! Thanks. -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: CPU heating!
On Sunday 13 February 2011 18:52:16 Mario Lobo wrote: Hi; I am following 8-CURRENT AMD64. I have a Phenom II 955. Up to the 3rd week of January, I had 8-STABLE. Idle CPU temp was 42~44 C (which is already not excellent, i know) and full load would never go above 60 C (compiling VBox from KDE, for instance). After updating to 8.2-PRERELEASE, my temps now are: idle:not less than 48 C full load (same above conditions): it reached 65.5 C with peaks of 66 C!. Was there any big change between these versions that could be causing this? Just an update to this topic: BEFORE: FBSD 8.2-RELEASE Phenom II 955 w/ stock cooler Idle temp at turn-on: 42~44 C Idle temp after 3 hrs: 48~49.5 C Load (95~100%)temp: 64~66.5 C (w/ peaks of 67.5) With the side of the computer case off. I replaced the thermal grease (as advised here) with a new one but that didn't change those figures. AFTER: FBSD 8.1-STABLE Phenom II 955 w/ a ZALMAN CNPS 10x PERFORMA cooler Idle temp at turn-on: 35~37 C Idle temp after the compilation: 43~44 C Load (95~100%)temp: 54~56.5 C (w/ peaks of 57 tops) With the side of the computer case ON. On both cases, the load was provided by compiling Vbox (4.0.2) under KDE and room temp was around 30 C. Powerd on for both. I noticed one thing. With 8.2-RELEASE, the compilation process stays at 100% load a lot longer than with 8.1-STABLE. During the compile with 8.2, there was a time I counted about 9 seconds at 100% load, plus about 3 or 4 extra 100% load of around 5 secs each. With 8.1, I only saw 4 half second ( well, it seemed like a half to me) 100% load peaks. And that was it. Beleive me, I counted them. Thanks to all that tried to help! -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: CPU heating!
On Thursday 17 February 2011 19:59:18 Chuck Swiger wrote: Um, so you obviously aren't comparing similar circumstances. No! Not at all. Most computer cases are designed with front-to-back airflow (ie, intake fans in the front, exhaust fans and the PSU in the back) and cool more effectively with the case on Well, in my case, with the BEFORE situation, if I had the side case cover on, the temps would be even higher ! -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: CPU heating!
On Thursday 17 February 2011 21:20:57 Chuck Swiger wrote: On Feb 17, 2011, at 3:06 PM, Mario Lobo wrote: Most computer cases are designed with front-to-back airflow (ie, intake fans in the front, exhaust fans and the PSU in the back) and cool more effectively with the case on Well, in my case, with the BEFORE situation, if I had the side case cover on, the temps would be even higher ! Are they? Well, that suggests something could be wrong with your case ventilation-- perhaps a stuck (or even reversed) fan. They are neither reversed nor stuck. I am truly paranoid about that. I have a front fan pulling in and a back fan pushing out. I even have one of the front device covers out since I bought this CPU. That's the air flow since day one. I can't say that nothing changed inside the machine since I added a HD to it but the heating came long after that. I know, it's not as interesting as the possibility that different versions of FreeBSD present different CPU load, but if you aren't controlling for major factors like the case being opened or closed, or using different coolers, then there's little point in worrying about whether your load-testing of the software is accurate. I didn't mean to imply that the different versions of FBSD was THE cause of heating. But the fact is that it started to happen after the upgrade. It's probably just a coincidence. The fact is that downgrading to 8.1 improved the cooling. Very little ( -1 degree, that's true) but improved nonetheless. You're certainly right. My load testing method isn't accurate but my observations are. Even if your measuring instrument is not accuratly calibrated, the absolute value of the measurement can not be trusted, but the difference of two measurements with the same instrument can. The instrument being my hardware in this case. I pointed the difference in load between 8.1 and 8.2 when compiling, as something I noticed. Just that. -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: CPU heating!
On Monday 14 February 2011 11:32:18 Chris Brennan wrote: You need to replace the thermal grease on your processor? It goes hard and loses effectiveness. I recommend Arctic Silver 5. It even comes in this little push-tube applicator with a plunger ... but it works great! Arctic Silver is probably the best their is, highly recommended. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org Thanks to all. I'll give it a shot. -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
CPU heating!
Hi; I am following 8-CURRENT AMD64. I have a Phenom II 955. Up to the 3rd week of January, I had 8-STABLE. Idle CPU temp was 42~44 C (which is already not excellent, i know) and full load would never go above 60 C (compiling VBox from KDE, for instance). After updating to 8.2-PRERELEASE, my temps now are: idle:not less than 48 C full load (same above conditions): it reached 65.5 C with peaks of 66 C!. Was there any big change between these versions that could be causing this? -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Accessing a GPT drive
Hi; Os: FreeBSD amd64 w/ options GEOM_PART_GPT I added a drive to my system which I installed win7 64. The drive is 500G. I gave 100G to win7. Then I created an ext2 partition with the unallocated space with a gparted cd. fdisk shows the MBR of the drive with the win7 system and data partitions and the ext2 partition created. I need to access both the NTFS win7 and ext2 partitions from freeBSD. FBSD sees the drive (ada2) but does not see the partitions. I need to access the ext2 partition from both FBSD and win7. I have another ext2 on the other drive that both OSs see fine but that drive has MBR scheme. Win7 only installs in a GPT partition. What I really need if for FBSD to access that drive. I've googled for a couple days but didn't find any clues that could help me. Anybody has any hints on how I could make this work? Thanks, -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since version 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99,7% winfoes FREE) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: 8.2 prerelease, virtualbox, and windows guests that freeze...
On Saturday 05 February 2011 22:12:45 Eric Schuele wrote: All, I have a laptop running 8.2-prerelease GENERIC. I have virtualbox ose 3.2.12 from ports (and kmod as well). I've only installed windows guests in vbox. I've installed windows 2008 server 64, windows vista 64bit, and windows 7 32bit. I have the vbox hdd images on an NTFS filesystem mounted using fuse. My box is a dual boot machine between FreeBSD and Windows. My desire is to be able to utilize the same virtual machine in vbox on both my Windows and FreeBSD installations. I can successfully utilize the virtuals in vbox (same version) in Windows. However when I utilize any of the virtual machines in FreeBSD, they run for several minutes and eventually freeze. Freeze may not necessarily be the correct term. All windows processes on the virtual machine begin to die. First one process, then another, then all. Hard to explain, which may not help my cause here. But, most important fact... in Windows they work fine... under FreeBSD they run for a while and then cease to run. When the VM is good and dead, it is always dead with the little vbox virtual hard disk LED lit up (no idea if that is important). Previously, they would run for a *very* short time. seconds? minutes? and then die (sometimes I couldn't login). I disabled sound support and now they run for 10-15 minutes. Had one run for an hour or two the other day, but can't reproduce that. Usually 10-15 minutes max. Network works fine inside the virtual. I'm new to VirtualBox on FreeBSD. I've used it a bit on Windows with good results. I did try a windows guest on a non fuse filesystem just to rule that out, but had same issue. What else could I provide that might allow someone to point me in the right direction here? Thanks. -- Regards, Eric Eric; My advice to you is that you change the file system on drive that holds the VMs files from NTFS to EXT2. NTFS file systems on FreeBSD or even Linux are OK only for doing small r/w stuff. I use the ntfs-3g which is really good but don't trust NTFS for heavy usage under those OSs. Sometimes it's not even trustable under windows itself. EXT on the other hand, is very stable in FreeBSD and has very good drivers for any version of 32/64 windows (Ext2IFS_1_11a) so you can access you vdi files. hope this helps. -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: 8.2 prerelease, virtualbox, and windows guests that freeze...
On Sunday 06 February 2011 13:09:47 Eric Schuele wrote: Thanks for the suggestion, however, I've already tried this (sorta). From my original post... I did try a windows guest on a non fuse filesystem just to rule that out, but had same issue. I suppose it may have been a little less than clear. By non fuse filesystem I actually meant UFS. The problem still persisted. NTFS file systems on FreeBSD or even Linux are OK only for doing small r/w stuff. I use the ntfs-3g which is really good but don't trust NTFS for heavy usage under those OSs. Sometimes it's not even trustable under windows itself. My bad!. Sorry!. But it seems that you're right. Looks like the issue is not the FS then. If you're building from the ports, try the svn version from: https://svn.bluelife.at/index.cgi/blueports It's already version 4.0.2 there. I realize NTFS on fBSD has been shaky in the past, but had heard it had come a long way these days. It does seem to work well for all my purposes, except these VMs. Had hoped NTFS was not the issue. I've not tried the EXT IFS for windows yet, nor had I heard much regarding their success or failure. If your willing to go out on a limb and say very good drivers for any version of 32/64 windows... I'll give it a try, and post my results. :) Forgive me if it sounded on a limb. Didn't mean to look like that. The only reason I mentioned it is because it's exactly the way I've been using. I have triple boot system. BSD AMD64, XP32 and Win7 64 and the IFS driver works flawlessly on both windows, and all 3 Vboxes accessing the same VDIs. Because of that, I believe I may have got carried away by saying any win version. regards, -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: 8.2 prerelease, virtualbox, and windows guests that freeze...
On Sunday 06 February 2011 17:48:45 Chris Brennan wrote: On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 11:09 AM, Eric Schuele e.schu...@computer.orgwrote: I realize NTFS on fBSD has been shaky in the past, but had heard it had come a long way these days. It does seem to work well for all my purposes, except these VMs. Had hoped NTFS was not the issue. ntfs/ntfs-3g is foolhardy at best in linux *and* fbsd ... it's trashed so many drives.partitions on me it's not even funny anymore... and I never did much w/ them except small stuff anyway. If you need to access the volumes in *nix/windows then why not FAT32 then? I use a FAT32 drive for my music so I can access it in any OS reliably and the drive is now 6+ years old. FAT32 max file size is 4Gig. -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [Fwd: Re: /usr/ports/net/pptpclient]
On Tuesday 14 December 2010 15:03:11 Mike Sabroff wrote: Is this the right place to post this question? Original Message Subject: Re: /usr/ports/net/pptpclient Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 09:41:39 -0800 From: Nicklas Johnson [1]free...@spatula.net To: [2]msabr...@sbcglobal.net CC: [3]freebsd-j...@freebsd.org References: [4]4d07a1cc.4080...@sbcglobal.net This list is for discussion of the various Java ports on FreeBSD. � I don't think it is the correct place for your question about establishing a VPN connection. I suggest trying [5]freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org instead. � � Nick On 14 December 2010 08:56, Mike Sabroff [6]msabr...@sbcglobal.net wrote: I hope this is the correct place to ask about this port. I am trying to get a VPN connection to the office and after googleing, it looked like this would be a good choice for FreeBSD. I am running 7.3-RELEASE FreeBSD. I had no problem building or installing, in fact it was fast and sweet! I followed some documentation I found on the setup and modifying the /etc/resolve.conf file and all went fine until I ran the script to invoke pptp and when it ran I got an error message stating basically that /usr/bin/ip was an unknown command. ip is a linux command but doesn't seem to be part of a default freebsd system. My question isWhat if any is the equivalent of ip on freebsd or which port would I install to get ip or it's equivalent? -- Mike Sabroff [7]msabr...@sbcglobal.net 608-877-0676 - Home 608-516-1801 - Cell -- Mike Sabroff [8]msabr...@sbcglobal.net 608-877-0676 - Home 608-516-1801 - Cell ___ [9]freebsd-j...@freebsd.org mailing list [10]http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-java To unsubscribe, send any mail to [11]freebsd-java-unsubscr...@freebsd.org -- Courage isn't just a matter of not being frightened, you know. It's being afraid and doing what you have to do anyway. � � -- Doctor Who - Planet of the Daleks This message has been brought to you by Nick Johnson 2.3b1 and the number 6. -- Mike Sabroff [12]msabr...@sbcglobal.net 608-877-0676 - Home 608-516-1801 - Cell References Visible links 1. mailto:free...@spatula.net 2. mailto:msabr...@sbcglobal.net 3. mailto:freebsd-j...@freebsd.org 4. mailto:4d07a1cc.4080...@sbcglobal.net 5. mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org 6. mailto:msabr...@sbcglobal.net 7. mailto:msabr...@sbcglobal.net 8. mailto:msabr...@sbcglobal.net 9. mailto:freebsd-j...@freebsd.org 10. http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-java 11. mailto:freebsd-java-unsubscr...@freebsd.org 12. mailto:msabr...@sbcglobal.net Hidden links: 13. http://healerNick.com/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org Give /usr/ports/net/mpd5 a try. I've been using it for a good while now and it works really well with either a windows server or FreeBSD server. -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Chinese FreeBSD
Hi; I know this is old news. http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/security/?p=1682 I was just curious if anybody would have a clue on how they've hardened FBSD, either by just using its own resources or by hacking the code further. -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Why do you use a devil as a mascot?
On Friday 12 November 2010 23:27:42 Mubeesh ali wrote: i guess it is high time this list bans the word devil in subject ;-) Let's hack the term and use lucifer instead! -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99% winfoes FREE) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Tips for installing windows and freeBSD both.. anyone??
On Wednesday 10 November 2010 06:21:18 Bruce Cran wrote: On Wed, 10 Nov 2010 04:02:34 +0100 Michael Ross michael.r...@gmx.net wrote: For Windows OSes there is actually a rather nice tool out there, http://www.autoitscript.com/autoit3/ which allows you to script the GUI cross-app. Microsoft also have the UI Automation API to script GUI applications. In my humble experience, I think there are 2 distinct aspects to this issue. I use FBSD both as desktop and as server. In practice, I need a GUI for desktop work and none whatsoever for server work. The only time I needed some kind of GUI component on a server was when I wanted to test a VM on it and I wanted the comodity of running VirtualBox console on my desktop. Other than that, the command line is more than enough. OTOH, for the kind of work that I do, having 4 workspaces is absolutely handy. And to be able to switch between these 4 scenarios with the scroll of a middle button is definetly a plus. just my 0,02 cents. -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99% winfoes FREE) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: (no subject)
On Friday 17 September 2010 17:45:40 Modulok wrote: I have an old box I want to turn into a file server backup machine. Unfortunately, the mainboard has only PATA headers. I do have three PCI slots though, so I was looking at a PCI SATA controller card that will get along with FreeBSD without a fuss. Nothing fancy, just something inexpensive that I can plug a few SATA drives into. Then I'll create a graid3 with them, or mess around with ZFS. Anyone using something worth a recommendation? There are IDE to SATA converters. You plug it directly into the IDE connector and on the other end you have a SATA150 plug. This is news to me. I now have two on the way :) Thank you! -Modulok- You're welcome ! Let me know if you need any info on the one I have. -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99% winfoes FREE) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: (no subject)
On Thursday 16 September 2010 04:18:07 Modulok wrote: List, I have an old box I want to turn into a file server backup machine. Unfortunately, the mainboard has only PATA headers. I do have three PCI slots though, so I was looking at a PCI SATA controller card that will get along with FreeBSD without a fuss. Nothing fancy, just something inexpensive that I can plug a few SATA drives into. Then I'll create a graid3 with them, or mess around with ZFS. Anyone using something worth a recommendation? Thanks! -Modulok- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org There are IDE to SATA converters. You plug it directly into the IDE connector and on the other end you have a SATA150 plug. I've been using one here on my home server for about 1,5 years without any problem. -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99% winfoes FREE) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
