Re: any bandwidth limiting tools other than dummynet?
On Sun, 05 Sep 2004 13:45:39 +0200 Alex de Kruijff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ADK> > Well you have some higher level tools embebed in some services ADK> > like pure-ftpd/puredb you can limit up/down bandwitdh and quotas, ADK> > etc.. But it's better to limit it with ALTQ/dummynet, that's why ADK> > they exist. By the way, where is the most recent stable ALTQ for FreeBSD 4.x? ALTQ on http://www.csl.sony.co.jp/person/kjc/programs.html is from bronze age at best, seeming more likely from late neolith. ALTQ in pf is 5.x only, and I didn't find a way to reserve bandwidth for high-priority traffic in dummynet. -- Alex. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: any bandwidth limiting tools other than dummynet?
On Sat, Sep 04, 2004 at 03:07:31AM +0100, Nullius Void wrote: > Well you have some higher level tools embebed in some services like > pure-ftpd/puredb you can limit up/down bandwitdh and quotas, etc.. But > it's better to limit it with ALTQ/dummynet, that's why they exist. Isn't pure-ftp a ftp solution only? Dummynet is proberbly ruled out because he didn't like ipfw. Please don't top-post and please cc people. -- Alex Articles based on solutions that I use: http://www.kruijff.org/alex/FreeBSD/ ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: any bandwidth limiting tools other than dummynet?
Well you have some higher level tools embebed in some services like pure-ftpd/puredb you can limit up/down bandwitdh and quotas, etc.. But it's better to limit it with ALTQ/dummynet, that's why they exist. On Sat, 04 Sep 2004 01:14:07 +0200, Alex de Kruijff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 03:12:56PM +0300, Erik U. wrote: > > I use ipf and i dont want to use ipfw and dummynet. Is there any way to > > limit the bandwidth? > > Did you know you can use ipfw and ipf togetter? (I.e. ipf for > firewalling and ipfw for traffic shapping.) You could try to combine ipf > with ipa (port) but it will not be a nice sollution. (i.e. adding deny > rules when someone uses the internet alot.) > > P.S. I moved the cc to questions instead of stable, because i feel this > belongs there more. See the handbook for the descriptions of the > maillists. > > -- > Alex > > Articles based on solutions that I use: > http://www.kruijff.org/alex/FreeBSD/ > ___ > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: any bandwidth limiting tools other than dummynet?
On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 03:12:56PM +0300, Erik U. wrote: > I use ipf and i dont want to use ipfw and dummynet. Is there any way to > limit the bandwidth? Did you know you can use ipfw and ipf togetter? (I.e. ipf for firewalling and ipfw for traffic shapping.) You could try to combine ipf with ipa (port) but it will not be a nice sollution. (i.e. adding deny rules when someone uses the internet alot.) P.S. I moved the cc to questions instead of stable, because i feel this belongs there more. See the handbook for the descriptions of the maillists. -- Alex Articles based on solutions that I use: http://www.kruijff.org/alex/FreeBSD/ ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
