[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #13873] [patch 07/07] load game settings from ruleset file
Follow-up Comment #4, bug #13873 (project freeciv): this could be done with an extra line in the game.ruleset file [game] ; define the game setting borders = 2 ; lock it (first player is _not_ allowed to change it) borders.lock = 1 The setting.lock defaults to FALSE. If it is true, the setting can't be changed. This requires that the 'rulesetdir' command can't be executed by the first player. Does warclient/warserver has such an option? First I have to solve the main problem. My ideas are: * 'rulesetdir' command loads the ruleset + settings from the game.ruleset file * The reset command has to restore all settings to the default values and load the settings from the game.ruleset file. An additional hint to changed settings could be added. * executing 'rulesetdir' again does check if another ruleset is requested. If it is not the case, the current code will do nothing. This must be changed to a reset (= default settings + changes from the game.ruleset file). This way one will have a well defined state after executing the rulesetdir command. ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/bugs/?13873 ___ Nachricht geschickt von/durch Gna! http://gna.org/ ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #1195] AI: Increase want for trade routes when economy is weak
Update of patch #1195 (project freeciv): Category:None = ai Status:None = Done Assigned to:None = cazfi Open/Closed:Open = Closed ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/patch/?1195 ___ Message sent via/by Gna! http://gna.org/ ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #1189] [Patch] Allow airlifts to allied cities
Follow-up Comment #1, patch #1189 (project freeciv): One problem I see with this is that ally may end using the valuable airlift capacity of your city you would need yourself. Human allies can of course coordinate things via chat but AI allies are problem. It's already a problem that they are loading units to allied transports so no units of transport owner fit in. Why are you only allowing airlift *to* allied city? Shouldn't it be symmetrically also allowed *from* allied city? ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/patch/?1189 ___ Message sent via/by Gna! http://gna.org/ ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #1188] proposed menu and command key revamp
Follow-up Comment #2, patch #1188 (project freeciv): This patch does not apply cleanly to current menu.c ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/patch/?1188 ___ Message sent via/by Gna! http://gna.org/ ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #13891] [Patch] Chat colors and other improvements
Follow-up Comment #3, bug #13891 (project freeciv): text_tag_replace_text() looks for unit or city id and then determines city/unit name based on that. This means no name is shown when city/unit is not known by client. This is a problem. Server should be allowed to send messages about any city/unit without modifying message (selecting between plain text and link) based on each client's knowledge. Think about wonder started messages. city_link() and unit_link() do insert city/unit name to link tag. It's just not used. Note that unit name is not translated in current implementation as it should be if it's used in client end. ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/bugs/?13891 ___ Message sent via/by Gna! http://gna.org/ ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #1188] proposed menu and command key revamp
Follow-up Comment #3, patch #1188 (project freeciv): Huh, that's odd. menu.c hasn't changed since I made the patches. Maybe I made an error? Which patch doesn't work? Did you apply them in order? (menu.c.01_reorg.diff, menu.c.02_accels_revised.diff, then helpdata.txt.diff) menu.c.02_accels.diff (attachment 6196) should be marked as obsolete or superseded or however Gna marks a patch as old... I had tried to split the big patch into two logical parts, but maybe it would be better as a single patch. would you prefer that? In any case, thanks for taking the time to review it (or at least try ;-) ). ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/patch/?1188 ___ Message sent via/by Gna! http://gna.org/ ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
