[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #2903] [Metaticket] xml-files instead of self-made section-file format

2015-01-04 Thread Marko Lindqvist
Update of patch #2903 (project freeciv):

  Depends on: = patch #4884


___

Reply to this item at:

  http://gna.org/patch/?2903

___
  Message sent via/by Gna!
  http://gna.org/


___
Freeciv-dev mailing list
Freeciv-dev@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev


[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #2903] [Metaticket] xml-files instead of self-made section-file format

2015-01-04 Thread Marko Lindqvist
Update of patch #2903 (project freeciv):

  Depends on: = patch #4915


___

Reply to this item at:

  http://gna.org/patch/?2903

___
  Message sent via/by Gna!
  http://gna.org/


___
Freeciv-dev mailing list
Freeciv-dev@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev


[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #2903] [Metaticket] xml-files instead of self-made section-file format

2015-01-04 Thread Marko Lindqvist
Update of patch #2903 (project freeciv):

  Depends on: = patch #5505


___

Reply to this item at:

  http://gna.org/patch/?2903

___
  Message sent via/by Gna!
  http://gna.org/


___
Freeciv-dev mailing list
Freeciv-dev@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev


[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #2903] [Metaticket] xml-files instead of self-made section-file format

2015-01-04 Thread Marko Lindqvist
Update of patch #2903 (project freeciv):

  Status:None = In Progress
 Planned Release: = 3.0.0  


___

Reply to this item at:

  http://gna.org/patch/?2903

___
  Message sent via/by Gna!
  http://gna.org/


___
Freeciv-dev mailing list
Freeciv-dev@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev


[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #2903] [Metaticket] xml-files instead of self-made section-file format

2011-08-14 Thread Marko Lindqvist

Follow-up Comment #2, patch #2903 (project freeciv):

All the textual freeciv data files are in section file format: rulesets,
tileset specifications, savegames, configuration files...

I also have been thinking about freeciv version numbering in relation to
possible usage of xml-files. If we start using xml-files in large scale, I'd
like to call that freeciv version 3.0, especially if there's major
compatibility breaks:

2012 - Release 2.4 with no xml-stuff at all
2013 - Release 2.5 with xml supported to some extend, but not required
2014 - Release 3.0 with major switch to xml-files.


___

Reply to this item at:

  http://gna.org/patch/?2903

___
  Message sent via/by Gna!
  http://gna.org/


___
Freeciv-dev mailing list
Freeciv-dev@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev


[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #2903] [Metaticket] xml-files instead of self-made section-file format

2011-08-14 Thread David Lowe

Follow-up Comment #3, patch #2903 (project freeciv):

Let me start out by saying that i think this is a good idea, but the
implementation will determine whether users have a good experience or not.

- Dedicated xml-editors are easier for modpack authors to use than editing
our section file format in notepad

Absolutely.  My feeling is that it should always be *possible* to do stuff
like this by hand [in a text editor], being able to use off the shelf tools
would be an improvement.

- Adds libxml2 or expat dependency

I'm not familiar with whether this is a more lightweight or heavyweight need.
 I guess there might be problems in Windows due to the usual MS tactic of them
redefining the standard in some non-standard way?

- Some features our own section file format has can be hard to implement
using xml

Is this abundant caution, or do you know of specific fields that would be
mangled by XML?  As long as we don't have anything that resembles an XML tag
our stuff *should* pass through unmodified...



I like the initial view of the roadmap.  I suppose during the transitional
period we have a few choices:

1) Have the server able to read in several versions of savefiles and write
them in a few selected [stable] versions.  This will probably lead to charges
of bloat.

2) Provide a converter utility for the interim period.  It's extra work, but
it keeps the server smaller and the user can delete it when no longer needed. 
Optionally such a function could be provided on the web where the user uploads
an old savefile and downloads it in the new format.

3) Define a series of steps such that each release will only be able to read
in files from the current or last release and only save in current release
format.  This puts a burden on the user when switching between different
computers or even upgrading their distro.

___

Reply to this item at:

  http://gna.org/patch/?2903

___
  Message sent via/by Gna!
  http://gna.org/


___
Freeciv-dev mailing list
Freeciv-dev@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev


[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #2903] [Metaticket] xml-files instead of self-made section-file format

2011-08-14 Thread Matthias Pfafferodt

Follow-up Comment #4, patch #2903 (project freeciv):

I did the create the new savegame format. At that time I did not change the
basic structure (secfile). But XML seems to be a good idea. I do not know much
about it, but one of the first tests could be the creation of a Document Type
Definition (dtd) for the xml file. It could answer if it is possible:

 - Some features our own section file format has can be hard to implement
using xml 

___

Reply to this item at:

  http://gna.org/patch/?2903

___
  Nachricht geschickt von/durch Gna!
  http://gna.org/


___
Freeciv-dev mailing list
Freeciv-dev@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev


[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #2903] [Metaticket] xml-files instead of self-made section-file format

2011-08-13 Thread J. M. Gorbach

Follow-up Comment #1, patch #2903 (project freeciv):

Which freeciv-specific section file format? Scenarios? Rulesets? Maybe
Wesnoth system (files .cfg for scenarios, units, etc.)?

I don't know xml/xslt, but I am interested (especially scenarios).

___

Reply to this item at:

  http://gna.org/patch/?2903

___
  Messaggio inviato con/da Gna!
  http://gna.org/


___
Freeciv-dev mailing list
Freeciv-dev@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev